Welcome to Iviewit Technologies ~ Surf with Vision

Scroll down home page for more and more of the Greatest Patent Story Ever Told

NOTE THAT INVENTOR BERNSTEIN'S CAR, THE MINIVAN, WAS BLOWN UP WITH A BOMB ACCORDING TO FIRE INVESTIGATOR RICK LEE OF THE BOYNTON BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT. SO POWERFUL IT BLEW UP 3 CARS NEXT TO IT.

NOTE - THAT IS WHERE THE KIDS WOULD HAVE BEEN SITTING ONLY A FEW HOURS LATER

WARNING!
TO THOSE INTERESTED OR THINKING OF BECOMING INVOLVED IN THE IVIEWIT CRIMES ~ WITH THE BOMBING OF THE INVENTORS CAR, THE CHARGES FOR THE HEREIN DESCRIBED STATE, FEDERAL AND INTERNATIONAL CRIMES FOR BOTH PERPETRATORS AND ACCOMPLICES REGARDING THE PATENT THEFTS AND VIOLATIONS OF PUBLIC OFFICES, HAVE NOW ELEVATED TO ATTEMPTED MURDER and according to Federal Judge Shira Scheindlin the Case is about MURDER!!!

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Public Hearing: Standing Committee On The Judiciary New York Senate Judiciary Committee John L. Sampson Chairman

SUBJECT: The Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee, the grievance committees of the various Judicial Districts and the New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct

PURPOSE: This hearing will review the mission, procedures and level of public satisfaction with the Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee, the grievance committees of the various Judicial Districts as well as the New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct

Witness List for Judiciary Hearing 9/24/09 The Judicial & Attorney Disciplinary Process in the State of New York

The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court is the entity that is legally responsible for enforcing the Rules of Professional Conduct governing the conduct of attorneys in New York State. The Appellate Division Departments have created grievance committees that are charged with the investigation of complaints against attorneys. Within the First Judicial Department the Departmental Disciplinary Committee of the Appellate Division investigates complaints against attorneys. The New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct was created by the State Constitution and is charged with investigating complaints against Judges and Justices of the Unified Court System.

According to the 2009 Report of the Commission on Judicial Conduct, there were 1,923 complaints filed in 2008. Yet of these complaints only 262 were investigated and of those, 173 were dismissed. This hearing will examine the processes and procedures that are followed by the various agencies charged with the responsibility of enforcing the rules and regulations that must be followed by the Judiciary and the Bar in the State of New York. It will also evaluate public satisfaction with the disciplinary process.

ELIOT BERNSTEIN NEW YORK SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE HEARING TESTIMONY PART 1 of 2

ELIOT BERNSTEIN NEW YORK SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE HEARING TESTIMONY PART 2 of 2

Testimony of Eliot Bernstein @ 4.02.08 in this resurfaced video of the entire NY Senate Judiciary Committee Hearings, also @

The Lawsuit All Starts with A Whistleblower Complaint and Iviewit is Marked Legally Related to that Case by Federal Judge Shira Scheindlin. In the following video of a June 08, 2009 Judiciary Committee Hearing in New York, Christine C. Anderson (my hero) gives the real jiggy on the NY State Court Corruptions, she is first to testify after the Department Goons. In her Original Complaint she mentions Iviewit and the Onion Peels henceforth.

WARNING, p. Stephen Lamont has been terminated from acting on behalf of Iviewit or Eliot Bernstein and has been reported for certain alleged criminal misconduct to THE state of new York and other authorities. If Lamont offers you shares of stock or any other inducement involving Eliot Bernstein or Iviewit he is committing further fraud

By way of introduction, I am P. Stephen Lamont, former Acting CEO of Iviewit (counsel advised all Iviewit executives to resign their posts and work along side Iviewit rather than within Iviewit, as the former Board of Directors, Counsel and Accountants, disbanded without requisite notice to Shareholders in violation of law, thereby leaving massive liability and exposure) and a significant shareholder in Iviewit. With more than a fifteen year track record as a multimedia technology and consumer electronics licensing executive and holder of a J.D. in Intellectual Property Law from Columbia University, an M.B.A in Finance, and a B.S. in Industrial Engineering, I appallingly write at the cross current, by and between parties described herein, pattern of frauds, deceits, and misrepresentations that run so wide and so deep that it tears at the very fabric of what has become to be know as free commerce in this country, and, in the fact that it pertains to inventors rights, tears at the very fabric of the Constitution of the United States more fully described below. I write to you with, Eliot I. Bernstein, who was factually present throughout all of these events and so has contributed to assure the veracity of the statements herein and provide credible witness to the events described herein prior to my joining Iviewit. Mr. Bernstein is the main inventor of the technologies, inventions which he claims to have come from divine origin with a divine purpose.

On or about 1997, Iviewit’s founder, Eliot I. Bernstein and other inventors, came upon inventions pertaining to what industry experts have heretofore described as profound shifts from traditional techniques in video and imaging then overlooked in the annals of digital video and imaging technologies. Factually, the main video technology is one of capturing a video frame at a, including but not limited to, 320 by 240 frame size (roughly, ¼ of a display device) at a frame rate of one (1) to infinity frames per second (“fps” and at the twenty four (24) to thirty (30) range commonly referred to as “full frame rates” to those skilled in the art). Moreover, once captured, and in its simplest terms, the scaled frames are then digitized (if necessary), filtered, encoded, and delivered to an agnostic display device and then scaled to a full frame size of, including but not limited to, 1280 by 960 at the full frame rates of 24 to 30 fps. The result is, when combined with other proprietary technologies, high quality video at bandwidths of 56 or more Kbps to 6 Mbps per second, at a surprising seventy five percent (75%!) savings in throughput/bandwidth on any digital delivery system such as digital terrestrial, cable, satellite, multipoint-multichannel delivery system, or the Internet, and a similar 75%! savings in storage on mediums such as digital video discs “DVD’s” and the hard drives of many consumer electronic devices. Also, these savings result in a 75%! decrease in the necessary processing power to encode the video, making old school concepts of parallel processors obsolete and allowing the process of encoding to occur on even a laptop. Therefore, the video technology opened new markets therefore in both low bandwidth video as is found on cell phones and the Internet to the other end of the spectrum to high end video such as HDDVD, etc. changing even the way television was created, transmitted and viewed, a change from interlacing to the new Iviewit scaling processes, allowing cable companies to increase channel throughput by 75%! Moreover, on the imaging side, the Iviewit inventions are used on almost every digital camera and present screen design and other devices that utilize the feature of “digital zoom”, whereby the imaging technology provided a way to zoom almost infinitely on a low resolution file with clarity, solving for pixilation that was inherent in the prior art. Furthermore, industry observers who benefited from the Iviewit disclosures have gone on to claim "you could have put 10,000 engineers in a room for 10,000 years and they would never have come up with these ideas…” These engineers similarly claimed, to a broad audience, that the technologies were "priceless", the "Holy Grail" of the digital imaging and video world.

Still further, it should be clear, as it relates to the inventions, that we are not talking about some rudimentary software that will be rendered obsolete as newer versions emerge, but that the Iviewit video scaling and image overlay systems are THE backbone, enabling technologies for the transmission of video and images across all transmission networks and viewable on all display devices, where the inventors went back to square one to create a wholly novel elegant upstream solution (towards the content creator) of reconfiguring video and image frames to unlock former bandwidth constraints, led to new processing and storage capabilities and took the video and imaging worlds to a new dimension.

Moreover, if these inventions become the subject of say a court ordered injunction while investigations are ongoing, it would preclude the use of the technologies while the courts resolve these matters, similar to the recent case almost brought in the RIM/Blackberry matter. Although dwarfed in comparison, that injunction would have shut Blackberry down to users had the parties not settled the matters, by way of tremendous pressure from the Court, the courts being on of the biggest users of the technology. The results of an injunction of the Iviewit technologies would be catastrophic to the country in that the product recall alone would be devastating to commerce, shutting down video across the Internet, recalling low bandwidth cell phones, recalling digital camera’s with digital zoom, halting the transmission of 75% of cable channels, recalling medical devices that use scaled zoom, recalling technologies on the Hubble Space Telescope and other government uses, such as flight and space simulators, advanced weapons systems, etc. These matters are of tantamount importance to federal and international commerce in countless ways, making the job of resolving the crimes against Iviewit a matter of national security concern unprecedented in the history of invention and law.

Furthermore, initially, and early in my tenure, rumors began swirling around the company with finger pointing and all from Florida to Los Angeles wherein it caught the jet stream and arrived very soon in New York of alleged breaches of confidentiality pertaining to Iviewit technology, transfers of trade secrets, and, even in certain circumstances, the knowing and willful invention fraud by the outright switching of signature pages of patent filings by early patent counsels. Additionally, during my tenure, I was in possession of an executed patent application pertaining to Iviewit’s core imaging technology with the inventors of Bernstein and Shirajee, when, out of thin air, and just prior to filing, with no notice or authorization, such patent application witnesses the addition of a one Brian G. Utley as an inventor, and an individual who could not have been farther from the heat of the inventive stage of the imaging technology.

Still further, I submit that at the first disclosures of the inventions, patent counsel, including Kenneth Rubenstein (also sole patent evaluator and legal counsel to MPEG LA), who had spent half a lifetime attempting and failing to procure technologies for the transmission of full screen, full frame rate video across a variety of transmission networks, and who during the Iviewit disclosures had been known to state “[I] missed that,” and “[I] never thought of that,” and “[This] changes everything,” or words to those effects, Rubenstein was perhaps so fearful that Iviewit would partner with other proprietary technologies across the video value chain that it could wipe his carefully crafted patent pools off the face of the map, therefore, the Iviewit inventions HAD to be converted to MPEGLA, LLC to preserve those pools and convert his client Iviewit's technologies to his pools, of course blocking Iviewit at the same time from market using typical anti-trust tactics commonly associated with patent pools of the past and the reason the Justice Department has typically broken such pools up, as they are anti-competitive, monopolistic in nature.

That was the first step, with the second step, through the direct and indirect introductions of Iviewit, with executed confidentiality agreements (“NDA’s”), to some five hundred potential licensees by colleagues of counsel, being the proliferation of Iviewit disclosures across a wide array of potential licensees and competitors. In addition to tying and bundling the technologies into his patent pool licensing scheme, again in violation of most of the anti-trust laws.

Following along, we arrive at the point in the past when Iviewit had thought the Iviewit inventions had been filed at the United States Patent & Trademark Office and the United States Copyright Office and that everyone had begun to use it, when past management in Iviewit and patent counsel were found writing patents in patent counsels name and other non-inventor management names, in addition to the intentional unauthorized changes of inventors, owners and assignees. Later, as Arthur Andersen conducted an audit on behalf of investor Crossbow Ventures whose funds were 2/3 Small Business Administration loans, evidence emerged of a corporate shell game involving multiple, unauthorized, similarly named corporate formations, unauthorized stock swaps and unauthorized asset transfers that resulted in the core patent applications assigned to entities that may have only one shareholder, perhaps the limited liability partnership of Proskauer Rose or other unauthorized holders, including the alleged perpetrating patent counsel, perhaps, with a view towards resurrecting the backbone technologies at some future point only converted illegally as their own.

Moreover, in a September 2006 letter to Representative Nita Lowey (D-NY 18th) I wrote that in the above series of allegations, Iviewit is confident that your Office will find a reasonable certainty that Messrs. Kenneth Rubenstein, Esq. of Proskauer, Raymond A. Joao, Esq. of Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolfe and Schlissel and William J. Dick, Esq., Steven Becker, Esq., and Douglas Boehm, Esq. of Foley and Lardner, all Iviewit Patent Counsel and present or former members of the distinguished Bar of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, designed and executed, either for themselves or others similarly situated, the deceptions, improprieties, and, even in certain circumstances, outright misappropriation by the disingenuous redirection of the disclosed Iviewit techniques by: (i) burying the critical elements of the inventions in patent applications filed on behalf of the true Iviewit Shareholders & Inventors; (ii) allowing the unauthorized use of Iviewit’s inventions under NDA’s without enforcement of said NDA’s; (III) filing patent applications of their own or others based on the Iviewit inventions into false inventors names and illegally set up corporations; (IV) submitting knowingly false statements and falsified documents done with intent to commit fraud on the USPTO (a federal offense), Iviewit’s shareholders, and the Iviewit Inventors. [It should be noted here that these attorneys and others are now under formal investigation by patent offices worldwide that have been ongoing for several years].

Furthermore, in that same Rep. Lowey letter, that as a result of the series of allegations enclosed, and although it is clear to Iviewit that the role of Congress is to make law not to enforce law, Iviewit finds it reasonable that your Office: (i) shall find the requisite merit to initiate Congressional investigations; (ii) shall pass these allegations to a Congressional staff attorney in the House Committee on Energy and Commerce, or other appropriate committee, for further investigation; (iii) shall instruct said staff attorney to institute a formal Congressional investigation, including questioning, requests for records, and other information from all parties involved; (iv) shall refer said attorney’s findings back to you as a Representative in the Congress of the United States; (v) shall present such findings to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce, or other appropriate committee, for determinative review; and finally (vi) shall witness said Congressional committee to urge disciplinary action against the alleged offending attorneys by the U.S. Attorney’s Office or other organization, agency, or court of appropriate jurisdiction.

Lastly, Iviewit often asks itself, among other things, “Why did the Hon. Jorge LaBarga of the Circuit Court of the Fifteenth Judicial District, Florida deny Iviewit’s Motion for Leave to Amend Answer to Assert Counterclaim for Damages (concerning the aforementioned allegations)” and “Why did the Supreme Court of Florida - The Florida Bar (‘TFB’) dismiss the complaint against Christopher C. Wheeler, Esq. (‘Wheeler’ and, a non-patent attorney, a main protagonist of the above referenced allegations) despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary” and “Why did the Supreme Court of Florida deny Iviewit’s Petition to begin the immediate investigation of the Wheeler complaint (when TFB admitted in writing that the answer to the Wheeler complaint was authored by an attorney, Matthew Triggs of Proskauer Rose, in flagrant violation of his public office obligations)” and “Why did the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department - Departmental Disciplinary Committee stall Iviewit’s complaint against Rubenstein and Joao despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary” and “Why, despite the New York State Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department’s Court Order (unanimously voted on by five Justices) to begin the immediate investigation of Rubenstein, Steven C. Krane (former NYSBA President & Proskauer partner who handled complaints against Joao and Rubenstein while maintaining undisclosed roles at the First Department) and Joao, for conflicts and violations of New York Supreme Court public offices, did the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division Second Department - Departmental Disciplinary Committee charged with conducting an immediate investigation dismiss on review the Rubenstein and Joao complaints and stating that they were ‘not under the jurisdiction’ of the First Department Court” [thus no witnesses were contacted, no evidence was tested and the attorneys did not even have to respond formally or informally to the charges against them] and "When conflicts were discovered at the Second Department with Krane why were complaints refused by the Second Department to be formally docketed against their members caught in conflict, those members denying complaints against themselves???" and “Why did the Virginia Bar Association dismiss the Dick complaint despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary and the fact that the United States Patent Office had suspended the Iviewit patents based on a Foley and Lardner intellectual property docket submitted to the VBA that had factually false and misleading information regarding patent inventors, owners and assignees” and “Why did the Supreme Court of the United States decline to hear Iviewit’s Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Florida Supreme Court to overturn the Florida Court’s decision, which acted to block Iviewit from filing complaints against Florida Supreme Court officers caught in conflicts of interest and violations of public offices” and “why did John Doll & Jon Dudas, Commissioners' of Patents at the USPTO, fail to correct the inventors, and refuse to take or return Iviewit’s call or respond to formal office filings, including a petition filed more than three years ago by Iviewit and its lead investor Crossbow Ventures/SBA, which led to the suspending of patent applications pending ongoing investigations” and Iviewit finds itself answering “THAT IT IS ALL PART AND PARCEL OF THE TOTAL DENIAL OF DUE PROCESS IN THE PATTERN OF FRAUDS, DECEITS, AND MISREPRESENTATIONS THAT RUN SO WIDE AND SO DEEP THAT IT TEARS AT THE VERY FABRIC OF WHAT HAS BECOME TO BE KNOW AS FREE COMMERCE IN THIS COUNTRY, AND, IN THE FACT THAT IT PERTAINS TO INVENTORS RIGHTS, TEARS AT THE VERY FABRIC OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES.”

Lastly, take to heart this following series of events that, from Tokyo to Munich and all places in between, has been commonly described as THE GREATEST PATENT STORY EVER TOLD while at the same time becoming one of the most bungled crimes in history, perhaps the largest crime ever perpetrated in the history of crime itself; crimes constituting further a treasonous series of actions to rob the United States Commerce Department, the country's greatest jewel, the United States Patent & Trademark Offices, usurping Free Commerce as we know it in America in the process! The cover-up, well to say the least, constitutes violation after violation of sworn oaths by government officials entrusted to uphold justice, elevating perhaps throughout the Legislative, the Executive and the Judicial branches, creating a government of criminal activity, a "Culture of Corruption" (paralleling the reality you now live in) all to deny due process and procedure, evade prosecution of the complaints filed against them and stave off the inevitable federal prison time for their actions, as further described herein.

READING THE CONTENTS OF THIS SITE MAY MAKE YOU PATENT YOUR INVENTIONS IN FOREIGN NATIONS V. THE UNITED STATES

The Company continues to pursue an aggressive intellectual property strategy. I-View-It has protected its enabling Intellectual Properties by filing US Patent Pending Applications, Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) International Applications, US Provisional Patent Pending Applications, Japanese Applications, Copyrights, Trademarks, Trade Secrets (we thinks, we are still trying to determine what was filed and what has been stolen, investigations ongoing). Below is summary of the key processes of the pending Intellectual Property Pool. Iviewit is a recognized innovator in the digital capture, encoding and distribution of video and images with patents pending, or in this case, patents suspending and is currently focusing on three of its core IP assets:

The Patent Pending process that utilizes scaled down video encodes that when transmitted to an end user produce full-screen video representations at an amazing 75% lower bandwidth than prior technologies. This process enables the delivery of distortion-free rich media at full-screen, full frame resolution with normal TV-equivalent frame rates at extremely low bandwidths, ideal for mediums such as the Internet, previously thought impossible. At high bandwidths, the process provides superior processing efficiencies and creates 75% smaller file sizes for digital distribution (i.e. DVD's, HDDVD, VCD's, SVCD's, etc.), an enormous savings over prior compression technologies. The scaled processes have effected all forms of hardware and software along the video value chain and have paved the way for low bandwidth video cell phones and allowed large scale Internet video. On the high of the bandwidth spectrum the technologies have transformed gaming from pong like graphics to the lifelike ones as common now in the Play Station, X-BOX, etc. The technologies having already had a profound effect on many scientific, medical and military processes affecting society in the endless uses of digital imaging and video technologies.

Mathematical Scaling Formula For Encoding & Viewing Images with Super Smooth Zoom & Pan Capabilities

Creates high definition, user controlled "super" zoom and pan capability levels without macro blocking and pixilation. The image scaling process is likely applicable to every known screen used in imaging, making the list of potential applications - and revenue streams - literally endless. From space telescopes, to digital camera's, to X-ray's, to MRI's, to space simulators, to satellite imaging tech's like Google Maps, etc. this set of technologies has taken the pixilation out of images when zooming

Combined Iviewit video and imaging processes to create a user interface allowing camera control and zoomable video streams.

Duh - Combined I View It imaging and video processes to create a user controlled video or television environment with super zoom and pan applications.

Ellen DeGeneres Speaks Out on Iviewit Technology - "Use Iviewit for the Sake of the Country"
Bet Ellen had no idea at the time how profound her statement would be and how much of the country is really at stake over it.

COME JOIN IVIEWIT IN THE GREATEST PATENT STORY EVER TOLD & PROTECT OUR COUNTRY FROM THE TERRORISTS WITHIN.

This site uses technologies that may or may not be protected by the United States Patent & Trademark Office & European Patent Office

HAS CORRUPTION REACHED OUR MOST ESTEEMED COMMERCE DEPARTMENT? WHAT HAVE THEY DONE TO PROTECT THE INVENTIONS AND INVENTORS?

Patents suspended indefinitely, investigations lingering for five years and a Patent Office that refuses to respond to official filings?

PART II - THE CRIMES AND CRIMINALS IN THE ATTEMPT TO STEAL THE IVIEWIT INVENTIONS

ELLEN G. WHITE

The greatest want of the world is the want of men, --men who will not be bought or sold; men who in their inmost souls are true and honest, men who do not fear to call sin by its right name; men whose conscience is as true to duty as the needle to the pole, men who will stand for the right though the heavens fall. -Education, p. 57(1903)

Complaint filed with the DOJ - OIG after the FBI lost the Iviewit case file and the Car Bombing files. Iviewit was told the agent handling the matters had retired early with the case files!

This complaint was filed after the US Attorney Office's claimed they had no case file for the case the FBI had prior presented to them.

Letter from the DOJ - OPR stating they have begun review of the matters. At this level of Justice, if the Justice Department tries to wiggle from the obligation to investigate and prosecute, it would take Alberto Gonzales or whomever replaces him to evade all due process and procedure in these matters and that order could only come from his remaining supporter, the President, the Decider and those who pull puppet strings. With Gonzales as credible as a perjurer, liar and possibly a war criminal, one would assume that these are the reasons the Bush Regime can not let him go. At that point, the country will become embroiled in Patentgate sooner or later, as it would take 20 years of the patent life and beyond to avoid the matters without due process, a non-reality.

December 15, 2007 Iviewit 1.5 Billion Federal Complaint Filed in the United States District Court - New York Southern District -- Filed in response to Whistleblower case revealing New York Supreme Court Officers Covered-Up Ethic Cases like Iviewit, as reported in NY Times and NY Law Journal below.

The MAYBE NOT SO Honorable Judge Shira A. Scheindlin or the MOST HONORABLE JUDGE ON HER WAY TO THE SUPREME COURT

'JUNIOR' SINGS SOPRANO August 17, 2006 -- John "Junior" Gotti finally sang - but it was "Happy Birthday" to a federal judge. Gotti helped Manhattan federal Judge Shira Scheindlin celebrate her 60th birthday by serenading her from his seat at the defense table yesterday. "I led the attack," Gotti said outside of court. "Everyone was saying, 'We're going to sing, we're going to sing,' and then they started chickening out." The bizarre and unusual birthday celebration was carried out in the courtroom - which was mysteriously closed to the public - before jury selection in Gotti's racketeering trial resumed for a third day. The mob scion was joined singing, "Happy Birthday Judge Scheindlin," by at least one of his defense lawyers, members of the prosecution team and court personnel. Participation wasn't exactly optional after the judge's courtroom deputy instructed everyone present in the courtroom to participate. Gotti and Scheindlin have been through a lot together over the past year. The former Gambino leader is facing his third trial for racketeering after two previous juries failed to reach a verdict - with all of the trials taking place in Scheindlin's courtroom. Later in the day the judge got some chuckles when she agreed to excuse a potential juror who had plans to travel to Paris to celebrate her mother's 60th birthday. "I'm particularly sympathetic to 60th birthdays," Scheindlin said. Scheindlin's mini-bash, which lacked gifts and cake, was a private affair. When a reporter tried to enter the courtroom as the singing was about to begin, deputies with the U.S. Marshals Service said the judge's deputy had instructed them to bar the public for 10 minutes, but they could not say why. Courtrooms are typically closed to the public only to protect the identity of cooperating witnesses, undercover agents and the victims of sex crimes, or for national-security concerns. Legal experts raised eyebrows at the fact that Scheindlin allowed the impromptu fete to occur at all. "This is not a major violation of judicial ethics. It's a pimple on the trial," said David Luban, law professor and legal ethicist at Georgetown University. "I think she ought to have stopped it. I think any trial judge is perfectly capable of cutting them off if something is not proper. It casts doubt in the judge's own partiality if the judge allows the defendant to sing 'Happy Birthday,' " said Luban. "It's a bizarre situation in the middle of the criminal trial singing 'Happy Birthday.' It's inappropriate," said Christopher Murray, a civil-rights attorney based in Garden City, L.I. Opening statements in the trial could take place as soon as this afternoon.

Judge Scheindlin presided over three trials of John Gotti Jr. ("Junior"), each of which ended in a mistrial due to a deadlocked jury.[6] The principle charge against Gotti in the trials was racketeering conspiracy stemming from Gotti's alleged management of the Gambino crime family following the incarceration and death of his father, John Gotti Sr. (the "Dapper Don"). "On September 20, 2005, the jury acquitted him of securities fraud and hung 11-1 for conviction on racketeering charges that included the assault on Sliwa. His re-trial on the remaining charges the following March also ended in a mistrial, with the jury hung 8-4 for acquittal. At the third trial involving the Sliwa assault, prosecutors convinced 12 jurors that Junior had ordered the kidnapping but failed to convince them that he had engaged in criminal activity after 1999 and the jury again deadlocked on the racketeering charges, this time voting 8-4 for conviction."

U.S. District Court
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Foley Square)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:07-cv-11196-SAS

Bernstein et al v. Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee et al
Assigned to: Judge Shira A. Scheindlin
Demand: $9,999,000

Related Case:

1:07-cv-09599-SAS

Cause: 18:1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act

Date Filed: 12/12/2007
Jury Demand: Plaintiff
Nature of Suit: 470 Racketeer/Corrupt Organization
Jurisdiction: Federal Question

Plaintiff

Eliot I. Bernstein
Individually

represented by

Eliot I. Bernstein
PRO SE

Plaintiff

Eliot I. Bernstein

represented by

Eliot I. Bernstein
(See above for address)
PRO SE

Plaintiff

P. Stephen Lamont
on behalf of Shareholders of UVIEW.COM, INC. – DL; IVIEWIT HOLDINGS, INC. – DL; IVIEWIT HOLDINGS, INC. – DL; IVIEWIT HOLDINGS, INC. – FL; IVIEWIT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. – DL; IVIEWIT.COM, INC. – FL; IVIEWIT.COM, INC. - DL; I.C., INC. – FL; IVIEWIT.COM LLC – DL; IVIEWIT LLC – DL; IVIEWIT CORPORATION – FL; IVIEWIT, INC. – FL; IVIEWIT, INC. – DEL; IVIEWIT CORPORATION. ANY OTHER JOHN DOE COMPANIES (“JOHN DOE”) NOT KNOWN AT THIS TIME, AS INVESTIGATIONS REMAIN OPEN; and Patent Interest Holders

represented by

Eliot I. Bernstein & P. Stephen Lamont
PRO SE

Plaintiffs

Shareholders of UVIEW.COM, INC. – DL; IVIEWIT HOLDINGS, INC. – DL; IVIEWIT HOLDINGS, INC. – DL; IVIEWIT HOLDINGS, INC. – FL; IVIEWIT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. – DL; IVIEWIT.COM, INC. – FL; IVIEWIT.COM, INC. - DL; I.C., INC. – FL; IVIEWIT.COM LLC – DL; IVIEWIT LLC – DL; IVIEWIT CORPORATION – FL; IVIEWIT, INC. – FL; IVIEWIT, INC. – DEL; IVIEWIT CORPORATION. ANY OTHER JOHN DOE COMPANIES (“JOHN DOE”) NOT KNOWN AT THIS TIME, AS INVESTIGATIONS REMAIN OPEN; and Patent Interest Holders:

Abbagliato, Leslie

Abbott, Alec B. and Sherry

Abelardo, Sonny

Ahmed, Mohammad

Air Apparent Travel Inc. - Employee Pool

Allison, Barney

Ames, Tom

Anderson Howard Employee Pool

Anderson, Kenneth

Arbuthnot, Lesli

Armstrong Hirsch Jackoway Tyerman & Wertheimer, P.C.

Armstrong, James

Ashkenazy, Penelope

Ashkenazy, Severyn

Bader, Robert and Robin

Baker, Sara Courtney

Bank, Vincent

Barrenneck, Lori

Becker, Barry & Stacy and Children

Benham, Blaze

Bernstein, Daniel Elijsha Abe Ottomo

Bernstein, David and Annika and Children

Bernstein, Eliot I. and Candice and Children

Bernstein, Irene

Bernstein, Jacob Noah Archie formerly The Jacob Bernstein 1999 Trust

Bernstein, Joshua Ennio Zander formerly The Joshua Bernstein 1999 Trust

Bernstein, Mark

Bernstein, Simon L. and Shirley

Bernstein, Stanley & Charlotte

Bernstein, Stephen

Bernstein, Theodore and Children

Bieler @ Bieler Bros. Records

Billotti, Beverly & Chip

Bleemusic Inc.

Blue Fiddle Records

Bouhenguel, Redjem

Brady, Frank

Brandon, Jennifer

Brunelas, Charles

Burnham, Frank

Butler, Edward

C. Allen Produtions

Calkins, John & Rebecca

Campion, John & Edmund

Castro, Tony and Children

Chavez, Charles

Chey, Douglas

Chirino, Tony

Clark, Tim

Cohen, James

Cohen, Karen & Laurie

Colter, David

Cookman, John E. Jr.

Cordero, Amber

Cowman, Jenna

Crawford, Megan

Crush Music Media Management

Daniels, Patricia

Davis, John & Gregg (on behalf of Marvin & Barbara Davis)

Deleo, Lisa

DiBedart, George

Dietz, Andrew and Donna and Children

Dittner, Chris & Cori

Diversafest LLC [DFEST]

Doyle, Matt and Michelle

Dusha, Bill

Ellis, Stacey

Engle, Noble

Erika R. Lewin

Evolution Promotions

Feigenbaum, Robert

Fischman, Joseph

Flecktones Tours LLC

Frazier, Sherri & Children

Freidkin, Monte

Frenden, Anthony

Friedstein , Jeffrey and Lisa and Children

Fritz, Brian

Fueled By Ramen Inc.

Gaffney, Esq., Mark W.

Gailet, Aubrie

Galvin, John

Garber, Edward

Garlipp, Joe

Gaspari, Maxemillion

George, William

Giordano, Anthony

Gluzband, Melissa

Gold, Steve

Goldstein, James & Christine

Gonsalves, Gregory

Gonsalves, Joel & Robin and Children

Gonsalves, Thaddeus and Judy and Children

Gonzales, Frank & Renee

Gorge, Sal

Gorman, Mitchell

Gregg, Jason

Grimes, Dale & Carol Groves

Grote, Lorna and Christopher

Guccione, Robert

Hagen, Lisa

Hale, Molly and Todd

Hanes, Leah

Happy Feet Living Trust - Ellen DeGeneres

Hard Head Management

Heche Trust - Anne Heche

Hendricks, Lisa

Hirschtick, Jon K.

Holfer, Larry

Horowitz, Marcel & Florence

Howard, Brett

I Hate Kate

Iantoni, Guy & Jill

In DeGoot

Indivision Management

INVESTECH Holdings LLC - H. Wayne Huizenga and H. Wayne Huizenga Jr.

Irell & Manella

Iviewit Charitable Giving Fund (Thought Journal)

Jackoway, Esq., James and Jackoway, Esq., Michele Marlene Mulrooney and Children

Jacobs, Jon

James, Russell

JMAX Productions

Jurcak, Courtney

Kane, Donald G.

Katz, Zach

Kaye, Timothy

Kennedy, Lori

Kershaw, Sarah

Kiley, Karen & Kevin

Klein, Beth and Frederick

Kluge, Jennifer

Krauel, Heidi

Krokower, Robert

Lamont, P. Stephen

Lauren Lloyd Living Trust

LCD Soundsystem

Leavitt, Amanda

Leavitt, Wayne

Leonsis, Ted

Lequeux, Blayne

Less than Jake

Lewin, Gerald R. & Barbara S.

Lewin, Jennifer P.

Lewinter, Esq., Anthony

Liu, Vinnie

Lockwood, Kevin

Lypaczewski, Paul

Lyte, Seamus

Magnussen, Ryan

Marino, Susie

McCrirrick, Flip and Leanne

McCullough, Lyle

McDonough Management

McFarland, William

McGee, Doc

McKittrick, Alan

Merritt & Sophia Howard Fund

Miah, Hassan

Milano Music Management

Miller, Paul

Milligan, Beverly

Mink, Matthew

Mitroo, Sumair

Moore, Charles Michael

Morgan, Misty

Morissette, Alanis

Morra, Buddy

Moss, Gina

Nadelman, Ari & Yona

Nance-Poor, Steve

Nathanson, Gary

New Media Holdings, Inc.

Newman, Carolyn

Nielsen, Gary

Nixon, Eric

Nixon, Sherri

Noyes, Mark

Ollivier, Jamie

Osterling, James

Palermo, RosE

Pay Up Management / Idolz Maker

Peake, Don

Perkiss, Corri

Pettus, Gary & Three Doors Down
Brad Arnold
Matt Roberts
Todd Harrell
Chris Henderson
Greg Upchurch

Pfeffer, Louis

Phillips, Matt

Preston, Daniel

Raymond, Tammy

Reale, Michael

Rebel Waltz

Reynolds, Joe & Shiny Toy Guns
Gregori Chad Petree
Jeremy Dawson
Mikey Martin
Sisely Treasure

Roach, Kevin

Roberman, Robert

Rock-It Cargo, USA Inc. Employee Pool

Roe, Jeff

Rogers, Esq., Caroline P. and Geoffrey and Children

Rogers, Spencer and Dana

Rosario, Jude

Rosen, Irving

Rosman, Esq., Richard

Rousseaux, Harmony

Ryan, Joseph

Sanctuary

Sanford, Thomas

Scanlan, Jack

Schleicher, Stephen

Seibert, Michael J.

Selz, Steven

Shirajee, Zakirul

Siefken, Rob

Silent Owners

Simon, Adam

Simon, David and Pamela and Children

Simon, John

Simpson, Crystal and Lucas

Simpson, Matthew

Sklar, Steve

Slaby, William and Michelle

Smith, Chris

Smith, Shenell

Special Team Music

Staley, Kim

Stanger, Bettie

Stanger, Dana

Stanger, Ginger

Stanger, Jeffrey and Kimberly and Children

Stanger, Lynn & Francis

Stanger, Paul

Stark, Joan

Steven Nevius

Stillman, John

Stomp, Michael and Nikki

Stomp, Sherry

STP Employee Fund

Street, Brian

Stuart, John

Supowitz, Lou

Sutherland, Steven

Terri, Chris

Thagard, Gregory B.

The Pocket Recordings

Tidal 4

Tuvia School

Utke, Karen & Brian

Valence, Jane

Veneer, Robert and Kari and Children

Verona, Stephen

Verzaal, Jessica

Villam Artists

Wall, Jeremey

Warren, Bruce

Washington, Debbie

Welch, Scott

Welsch, Mitchell & Isa

Westphal, Stew

Winters, Dorothy

World Audience

Young, Alan

Yuricek, Jeremy

Zamarin, Mitch

Defendant

STATE OF NEW YORK, THE OFFICE OF COURT ADMINISTRATION OF THE UNIFIED COURT SYSTEM,

PROSKAUER ROSE LLP, and, all of its Partners, Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and individual capacities,

STEVEN C. KRANE in his official and individual Capacities for the New York State Bar Association (former President of the NYSBA) and the Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee (officer of the Court), and, his professional and individual capacities as a Proskauer partner,

KENNETH RUBENSTEIN, in his professional and individual capacities,

ESTATE OF STEPHEN KAYE, in his professional and individual capacities,

ALAN S. JAFFE, in his professional and individual capacities,

ROBERT J. KAFIN, in his professional and individual capacities,

CHRISTOPHER C. WHEELER, in his professional and individual capacities,

MATTHEW M. TRIGGS in his official and individual capacity for The Florida Bar and his professional and individual capacities as a partner of Proskauer,

ALBERT T. GORTZ, in his professional and individual capacities,

CHRISTOPHER PRUZASKI, in his professional and individual capacities,

MARA LERNER ROBBINS, in her professional and individual capacities,

DONALD “ROCKY” THOMPSON, in his professional and individual capacities,

GAYLE COLEMAN, in her professional and individual capacities,

DAVID GEORGE, in his professional and individual capacities,

GEORGE A. PINCUS, in his professional and individual capacities,

GREGG REED, in his professional and individual capacities,

LEON GOLD, in his professional and individual capacities,

MARCY HAHN-SAPERSTEIN, in her professional and individual capacities,

KEVIN J. HEALY, in his professional and individual capacities,

STUART KAPP, in his professional and individual capacities,

RONALD F. STORETTE, in his professional and individual capacities,

CHRIS WOLF, in his professional and individual capacities,

JILL ZAMMAS, in her professional and individual capacities,

JON A. BAUMGARTEN, in his professional and individual capacities,

SCOTT P. COOPER, in his professional and individual capacities,

BRENDAN J. O'ROURKE, in his professional and individual capacities,

LAWRENCE I. WEINSTEIN, in his professional and individual capacities,

WILLIAM M. HART, in his professional and individual capacities,

DARYN A. GROSSMAN, in his professional and individual capacities,

JOSEPH A. CAPRARO JR., in his professional and individual capacities,

JAMES H. SHALEK, in his professional and individual capacities,

GREGORY MASHBERG, in his professional and individual capacities,

JOANNA SMITH, in her professional and individual capacities,

MELTZER LIPPE GOLDSTEIN WOLF & SCHLISSEL, P.C. and its predecessors and successors, and, all of its Partners, Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and individual capacities,

LEWIS S. MELTZER, in his professional and individual capacities,

KENNETH RUBENSTEIN, in his professional and individual capacities,

RAYMOND A. JOAO, in his professional and individual capacities,

FRANK MARTINEZ, in his professional and individual capacities,

FOLEY & LARDNER LLP, and, all of its Partners, Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and individual capacities,

MICHAEL C. GREBE, in his professional and individual capacities,

WILLIAM J. DICK, in his professional and individual capacities,

TODD C. NORBITZ, in his professional and individual capacities,

ANNE SEKEL, in his professional and individual capacities,

RALF BOER, in his professional and individual capacities,

BARRY GROSSMAN, in his professional and individual capacities,

JIM CLARK, in his professional and individual capacities,

DOUGLAS A. BOEHM, in his professional and individual capacities,

STEVEN C. BECKER, in his professional and individual capacities,

FORMER IVIEWIT MANAGEMENT

BRIAN G. UTLEY,

MICHAEL REALE,

RAYMOND HERSCH,

WILLIAM KASSER,

ROSS MILLER, ESQ. in his professional and individual capacities,

STATE OF FLORIDA, OFFICE OF THE STATE COURTS ADMINISTRATOR, FLORIDA,

HON. JORGE LABARGA in his official and individual capacities,

THE FLORIDA BAR,

JOHN ANTHONY BOGGS in his official and individual capacities,

KELLY OVERSTREET JOHNSON (former President) in her official and individual capacities,

LORRAINE CHRISTINE HOFFMAN in her official and individual capacities,

ERIC TURNER in his official and individual capacities,

KENNETH MARVIN in his official and individual capacities,

JOY A. BARTMON in her official and individual capacities,

JERALD BEER in his official and individual capacities,

BROAD & CASSEL, and, all of its Partners, Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and individual capacities,

KELLY OVERSTREET JOHNSON (former President) in her official and individual capacities,

JAMES J. WHEELER, in his professional and individual capacities,

FLORIDA SUPREME COURT,

Hon. Charles T. Wells, in his official and individual capacities,

Hon. Harry Lee Anstead, in his official and individual capacities,

Hon. R. Fred Lewis, in his official and individual capacities,

Hon. Peggy A. Quince, in his official and individual capacities,

Hon. Kenneth B. Bell, in his official and individual capacities,

THOMAS HALL, in his official and individual capacities,

DEBORAH YARBOROUGH in her official and individual capacities,

DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION – FLORIDA,

CITY OF BOCA RATON, FLA.,

ROBERT FLECHAUS in his official and individual capacities,

ANDREW SCOTT in his official and individual capacities,

SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION FIRST DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENTAL DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE,

THOMAS J. CAHILL in his official and individual capacities,

PAUL CURRAN in his official and individual capacities,

MARTIN R. GOLD in his official and individual capacities,

SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION FIRST DEPARTMENT,

CATHERINE O’HAGEN WOLFE in her official and individual capacities,

HON. ANGELA M. MAZZARELLI in her official and individual capacities,

HON. RICHARD T. ANDRIAS in his official and individual capacities,

HON. DAVID B. SAXE in his official and individual capacities,

HON. DAVID FRIEDMAN in his official and individual capacities,

HON. LUIZ A. GONZALES in his official and individual capacities,

SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT,

JAMES E. PELTZER in his official and individual capacities,

HON. A. GAIL PRUDENTI in her official and individual capacities,

SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION SECOND DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENTAL DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE,

LAWRENCE DIGIOVANNA in his official and individual capacities,

DIANA MAXFIELD KEARSE in her official and individual capacities,

HON. JUDITH S. KAYE (Chief Judge of the State of New York, New York Court of Appeals) in her official and individual capacities,

STATE OF NEW YORK COMMISSION OF INVESTIGATION,

ANTHONY CARTUSCIELLO in his official and individual capacities,

LAWYERS FUND FOR CLIENT PROTECTION OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK,

ELIOT SPITZER in his official and individual capacities, as both former Attorney General for the State of New York, and, as former Governor of the State of New York,

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA,

VIRGINIA STATE BAR,

ANDREW H. GOODMAN in his official and individual capacities,

NOEL SENGEL in her official and individual capacities,

MARY W. MARTELINO in her official and individual capacities,

LIZBETH L. MILLER, in her official and individual capacities,

MPEGLA, LLC,

LAWRENCE HORN, in his professional and individual capacities,

KENNETH RUBENSTEIN, in his professional and individual capacities,

REAL 3D, INC. (INTEL, SILICON GRAPHICS, INC. & LOCKHEED MARTIN) and successor companies,

GERALD STANLEY, in his professional and individual capacities,

DAVID BOLTON, in his professional and individual capacities,

TIM CONNOLLY, in his professional and individual capacities,

ROSALIE BIBONA, in her professional and individual capacities,

RYJO, INC.,

RYAN HUISMAN, in his professional and individual capacities,

INTEL CORP.,

LARRY PALLEY, in his professional and individual capacities,

SILICON GRAPHICS, INC.,

LOCKHEED MARTIN,

BLAKELY SOKOLOFF TAYLOR & ZAFMAN, LLP, and, all of its Partners, Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and individual capacities,

NORMAN ZAFMAN, in his professional and individual capacities,

THOMAS COESTER, in his professional and individual capacities,

FARZAD AHMINI, in his professional and individual capacities,

GEORGE HOOVER, in his professional and individual capacities,

WILDMAN, HARROLD, ALLEN & DIXON LLP, and, all of its Partners, Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and individual capacities,

MARTYN W. MOLYNEAUX, in his professional and individual capacities,

MICHAEL DOCKTERMAN, in his professional and individual capacities,

HARRISON GOODARD FOOTE, and, all of its Partners, Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and individual capacities,

MARTYN W. MOLYNEAUX, in his professional and individual capacities,

EUROPEAN PATENT OFFICE,

ALAIN POMPIDOU (former President) in his official and individual capacities,

WIM VAN DER EIJK in his official and individual capacities,

LISE DYBDAHL in her official and personal capacities,

YAMAKAWA INTERNATIONAL PATENT OFFICE, and, all of its Partners, Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and individual capacities,

MASAKI YAMAKAWA, in his professional and individual capacities,

CROSSBOW VENTURES, INC.,

ALPINE VENTURE CAPITAL PARTNERS LP,

STEPHEN J. WARNER, in his professional and individual capacities,

RENE P. EICHENBERGER, in his professional and individual capacities,

H. HICKMAN “HANK” POWELL, in his professional and individual capacities,

MAURICE BUCHSBAUM, in his professional and individual capacities,

ERIC CHEN, in his professional and individual capacities,

AVI HERSH, in his professional and individual capacities,

MATTHEW SHAW, in his professional and individual capacities,

BRUCE W. SHEWMAKER, in his professional and individual capacities,

RAVI M. UGALE, in his professional and individual capacities,

Digital Interactive Streams, Inc.,

Royal o’brien, in his professional and individual capacities,

HUIZENGA HOLDINGS INCORPORATED,

WAYNE HUIZENGA, in his professional and individual capacities,

WAYNE HUIZENGA, JR., in his professional and individual capacities,

TIEDEMANN INVESTMENT GROUP,

BRUCE T. PROLOW, in his professional and individual capacities,

CARL TIEDEMANN, in his professional and individual capacities,

ANDREW PHILIP CHESLER, in his professional and individual capacities,

CRAIG L. SMITH, in his professional and individual capacities,

Houston & Shahady, P.a., and any successors, and, all of its Partners, Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and individual capacities,

BART A. HOUSTON, ESQ. in his professional and individual capacities,

FURR & COHEN, P.A., and, all of its Partners, Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and individual capacities,

BRADLEY S. SCHRAIBERG, ESQ. in his professional and individual capacities,

MOSKOWITZ, MANDELL, SALIM & SIMOWITZ, P.A., and, all of its Partners, Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and individual capacities,

WILLIAM G. SALIM, ESQ. in his professional and individual capacities,

SACHS SAX & KLEIN, P.A., and, all of its Partners, Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and individual capacities,

BEN ZUCKERMAN, ESQ. in his professional and individual capacities,

SPENCER M. SAX, in his professional and individual capacities,

SCHIFFRIN & BARROWAY LLP, and any successors, and, all of its Partners, Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and individual capacities,

RICHARD SCHIFFRIN, in his professional and individual capacities,

ANDREW BARROWAY, in his professional and individual capacities,

KRISHNA NARINE, in his professional and individual capacities,

CHRISTOPHER & WEISBERG, P.A., and, all of its Partners, Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and individual capacities,

ALAN M. WEISBERG, in his professional and individual capacities,

ALBERTO GONZALES in his official and individual capacities,

JOHNNIE E. FRAZIER in his official and individual capacities,

IVIEWIT, INC., a Florida corporation,

IVIEWIT, INC., a Delaware corporation,

IVIEWIT HOLDINGS, INC., a Delaware corporation (f.k.a. Uview.com, Inc.)

UVIEW.COM, INC., a Delaware corporation

IVIEWIT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Delaware corporation (f.k.a. Iviewit Holdings, Inc.),

IVIEWIT HOLDINGS, INC., a Florida corporation,

IVIEWIT.COM, INC., a Florida corporation,

I.C., INC., a Florida corporation,

IVIEWIT.COM, INC., a Delaware corporation,

IVIEWIT.COM LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,

IVIEWIT LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,

IVIEWIT CORPORATION, a Florida corporation,

IBM CORPORATION,

JOHN AND JANE DOES.

Date Filed	#	Docket Text
12/12/2007	1	COMPLAINT against Catherine O'Hagen Wolfe (in their individual capacity), Paul Curran (in their official capacity), Paul Curran (in individual capacity), Martin R. Gold (in his individual capacity), Martin R. Gold (in their official capacity), Angela M. Mazzarelli (in her official capacity), Angela M. Mazzarelli (in her individual capacity), Richard T. Andrias (in his official capacity), Richard T. Andrias (in his individual capacity), David B. Saxe, David B. Saxe, David Friedman (in his official capacity), David Friedman (in his individual capacity), Luiz A. Gonzales (in his official capacity), Luiz A. Gonzales (in his individual capacity), Appellate Division Second Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee, Lawrence DiGiovanna (in his official capacity), Lawrence DiGiovanna (in his individual capacity), Diana Maxfield Kearse (in her official capacity), Diana Maxfield Kearse (in her individual capacity), James E. Peltzer (in his official capacity), James E. Peltzer (in his individual capacity), A. Gail Prudenti (in her official capacity), A. Gail Prudenti (in her individual capacity), Steven C. Krane (in his official capacity), Steven C. Krane (in his individual capacity), Judith S. Kaye, Judith S. Kaye, Kenneth Rubenstein, Estate of Stephen Kaye, Proskauer Rose LLP, Meltzer Lippe Goldstein & Breistone LLP, Lewis S. Meltzer, Raymond A. Joao, Foley Lardner LLP, Michael C. Grebe, William J. Dick, Douglas A. Boehm, Steven C. Becker, State of New York Commission of Investigation, Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee, Lawyers Fund for Client Protection of the State of New York, The Florida Bar, Lorraine Christine Hoffman (in her official capacity), Lorraine Christine Hoffman (in her individual capacity), Eric Turner (in his official capacity), Eric Turner (in his individual capacity), John Anthony Boggs (in his official capacity), John Anthony Boggs (in his individual capacity), Kenneth Marvin (in his official capacity), Kenneth Marvin (in his individual capacity), Thomas J. Cahill (in his official capacity), Thomas Hall (in his official capacity), Thomas Hall (in his individual capacity), Debroah Yarborough (in her official capacity), Debroah Yarborough (in her individual capacity), Virginia State Bar, Andrew H. Goodman (in his official capacity), Andrew H. Goodman (in his individual capacity), Noel Sengel (in her official capacity), Noel Sengel (in her individual capacity), Mary W. Martelino, Thomas J. Cahill (in his individual capacity), John Does, Joseph Wigley (in his official capacity), Joseph Wigley (in his individual capacity), Catherine O'Hagen Wolfe (in their official capacity). (Filing Fee $ 350.00, Receipt Number 635712)Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually), Eliot I. Bernstein, P. Stephen Lamont.(mbe) (Entered: 12/14/2007)
12/12/2007		SUMMONS ISSUED as to Catherine O'Hagen Wolfe (in their individual capacity), Paul Curran (in their official capacity), Paul Curran (in individual capacity), Martin R. Gold (in his individual capacity), Martin R. Gold (in their official capacity), Angela M. Mazzarelli (in her official capacity), Angela M. Mazzarelli (in her individual capacity), Richard T. Andrias (in his official capacity), Richard T. Andrias (in his individual capacity), David B. Saxe, David B. Saxe, David Friedman (in his official capacity), David Friedman (in his individual capacity), Luiz A. Gonzales (in his official capacity), Luiz A. Gonzales (in his individual capacity), Appellate Division Second Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee, Lawrence DiGiovanna (in his official capacity), Lawrence DiGiovanna (in his individual capacity), Diana Maxfield Kearse (in her official capacity), Diana Maxfield Kearse (in her individual capacity), James E. Peltzer (in his official capacity), James E. Peltzer (in his individual capacity), A. Gail Prudenti (in her official capacity), A. Gail Prudenti (in her individual capacity), Steven C. Krane (in his official capacity), Steven C. Krane (in his individual capacity), Judith S. Kaye, Judith S. Kaye, Kenneth Rubenstein, Estate of Stephen Kaye, Proskauer Rose LLP, Meltzer Lippe Goldstein & Breistone LLP, Lewis S. Meltzer, Raymond A. Joao, Foley Lardner LLP, Michael C. Grebe, William J. Dick, Douglas A. Boehm, Steven C. Becker, State of New York Commission of Investigation, Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee, Lawyers Fund for Client Protection of the State of New York, The Florida Bar, Lorraine Christine Hoffman (in her official capacity), Lorraine Christine Hoffman (in her individual capacity), Eric Turner (in his official capacity), Eric Turner (in his individual capacity), John Anthony Boggs (in his official capacity), John Anthony Boggs (in his individual capacity), Kenneth Marvin (in his official capacity), Kenneth Marvin (in his individual capacity), Thomas J. Cahill (in his official capacity), Thomas Hall (in his official capacity), Thomas Hall (in his individual capacity), Debroah Yarborough (in her official capacity), Debroah Yarborough (in her individual capacity), Virginia State Bar, Andrew H. Goodman (in his official capacity), Andrew H. Goodman (in his individual capacity), Noel Sengel (in her official capacity), Noel Sengel (in her individual capacity), Mary W. Martelino, Thomas J. Cahill (in his individual capacity), John Does, Joseph Wigley (in his official capacity), Joseph Wigley (in his individual capacity), Catherine O'Hagen Wolfe (in their official capacity). (mbe) (Entered: 12/14/2007)
12/12/2007		CASE REFERRED TO Judge Shira A. Scheindlin as possibly related to 1:07-cv-9599. (mbe) (Entered: 12/14/2007)
12/21/2007		CASE ACCEPTED AS RELATED. Create association to 1:07-cv-09599-SAS. Notice of Assignment to follow. (laq) (Entered: 01/10/2008)
12/21/2007	4	NOTICE OF CASE ASSIGNMENT to Judge Shira A. Scheindlin. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (laq) (Entered: 01/10/2008)
12/21/2007		Magistrate Judge Douglas F. Eaton is so designated. (laq) (Entered: 01/10/2008)
12/26/2007	2	MOTION for appointment of pro bono counsel; MOTION for Extension of Time to file amended complaint after original complaint has been filed on some or all of the defendants; MOTION for order for the United States Marshal Service to serve papers on remaining or all of the defendants; MOTION to accept limited power of attorney of plaintiff Bernstein and Plaintiff Lamont Accept Remote appearance of plaintiff Bernstein for Court Proceedings; and Physical Protection of Plaintiffs for Court Appearances. Attached is Affidavit in Support. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually), Eliot I. Bernstein. (djc) (Entered: 01/08/2008)
12/26/2007	3	DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually). (djc) (Entered: 01/09/2008)
1/10/2008		Mailed notice to the attorney(s) of record. (laq) (Entered: 01/10/2008)
1/10/2008	5	ORDER granting in part and denying in part 2 Motion to Appoint Counsel ; granting in part and denying in part 2 Motion for Extension of Time; granting in part and denying in part 2 Motion to Serve; granting in part and denying in part 2 Motion. For the reasons stated above, plaintiffs' motions are granted in part and denied in part. The United States Marshals are directed to serve the Complaint on defendants. Plaintiffs will have until twenty days after service is completed on all defendants to file an amended complaint. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close these motions (document no. 2 on the docket sheet). (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 1/9/2008)(jmi) (Entered: 01/11/2008)
1/23/2008		AMENDED SUMMONS ISSUED as to Catherine O'Hagen Wolfe (in their individual capacity), Paul Curran (in their official capacity), Paul Curran (in individual capacity), Martin R. Gold (in his individual capacity), Martin R. Gold (in their official capacity), Angela M. Mazzarelli (in her official capacity), Angela M. Mazzarelli (in her individual capacity), Richard T. Andrias (in his official capacity), Richard T. Andrias (in his individual capacity), David B. Saxe, David B. Saxe, David Friedman (in his official capacity), David Friedman (in his individual capacity), Luiz A. Gonzales (in his official capacity), Luiz A. Gonzales (in his individual capacity), Appellate Division Second Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee, Lawrence DiGiovanna (in his official capacity), Lawrence DiGiovanna (in his individual capacity), Diana Maxfield Kearse (in her official capacity), Diana Maxfield Kearse (in her individual capacity), James E. Peltzer (in his official capacity), James E. Peltzer (in his individual capacity), A. Gail Prudenti (in her official capacity), A. Gail Prudenti (in her individual capacity), Steven C. Krane (in his official capacity), Steven C. Krane (in his individual capacity), Judith S. Kaye, Judith S. Kaye, Kenneth Rubenstein, Estate of Stephen Kaye, Proskauer Rose LLP, Meltzer Lippe Goldstein & Breistone LLP, Lewis S. Meltzer, Raymond A. Joao, Foley Lardner LLP, Michael C. Grebe, William J. Dick, Douglas A. Boehm, Steven C. Becker, State of New York Commission of Investigation, Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee, Lawyers Fund for Client Protection of the State of New York, The Florida Bar, Lorraine Christine Hoffman (in her official capacity), Lorraine Christine Hoffman (in her individual capacity), Eric Turner (in his official capacity), Eric Turner (in his individual capacity), John Anthony Boggs (in his official capacity), John Anthony Boggs (in his individual capacity), Kenneth Marvin (in his official capacity), Kenneth Marvin (in his individual capacity), Thomas J. Cahill (in his official capacity), Thomas Hall (in his official capacity), Thomas Hall (in his individual capacity), Debroah Yarborough (in her official capacity), Debroah Yarborough (in her individual capacity), Virginia State Bar, Andrew H. Goodman (in his official capacity), Andrew H. Goodman (in his individual capacity), Noel Sengel (in her official capacity), Noel Sengel (in her individual capacity), Mary W. Martelino, Thomas J. Cahill (in his individual capacity), John Does, Joseph Wigley (in his official capacity), Joseph Wigley (in his individual capacity), Catherine O'Hagen Wolfe (in their official capacity). (tro) (Entered: 01/25/2008)
1/25/2008	MISSING FROM DOCKET	Court Memorandum to Serve 2 Copies of Complaint as Courtesy to the Attorney General [Andrew Cuomo]
2/19/2008	MISSING FROM DOCKET	RE: MISSING COMPLAINTS TO US MARSHALL FOR SERVICE IN CASE 07 CIV. 11196 (SAS) ELIOT I. BERNSTEIN, ET AL. V. APPELLATE DIVISION FIRST DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENTAL DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE, ET AL.
2/19/2008	MISSING FROM DOCKET
3/5/2008	MISSING FROM DOCKET	Re: Plaintiffs Opposition to State Defendants Letter of February 29, 2008 in Eliot I. Bernstein, et al. v. Appellate Division, First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee, et al.,
3/5/2008	MISSING FROM DOCKET	Docket No. 07 CV 11196 (SAS)
3/5/2008	MISSING FROM DOCKET	Re: Plaintiffs Opposition to Proskauer Rose March 4, 2008 to this Court in Eliot I. Bernstein, et al. v. Appellate Division, First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee, et al.,
3/5/2008	MISSING FROM DOCKET	Docket No. 07 CV 11196 (SAS)
3/7/2008	6	MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. David B. Saxe served on 2/28/2008, answer due 3/19/2008; David B. Saxe served on 2/28/2008, answer due 3/19/2008. Service was accepted by David B. Saxe. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein. (dle) (Entered: 03/10/2008)
3/10/2008	7	ORDER: I have considered plaintiffs' request and have determined that the Attorney General does not face an improper conflict of interest in representing the State Defendants. If, however, the Attorney General concludes that an investigation of defendants is warranted, then independent counsel would be required. Plaintiffs request that the Court find that defendant Raymond A. Joao's counsel, alleged to be John W. Fried is conflicted because Fried will be required to testify and may be added as a defendant. Plaintiffs' request is denied at this time. Plaintiff also request that the Court reconsider its earlier denial of plaintiffs' request for pro bono counsel. Plaintiffs have presented no such decisions or factual matters. The Request is denied. Defendants time to return waivers of personal service is hereby extended until March 21, 2008. Defendants shall move or answer no later than May 30, 2008. (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 3/7/2008) (jpo) (Entered: 03/10/2008)
3/11/2008	8	MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Martin R. Gold (in his individual capacity) served on 2/29/2008, answer due 3/20/2008; Martin R. Gold (in their official capacity) served on 2/29/2008, answer due 3/20/2008. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein. (jmi) (Entered: 03/14/2008)
3/13/2008	MISSING FROM DOCKET	Re: Plaintiffs Opposition to Court Order dated March 7, 2008 in Eliot I. Bernstein, et al. v. Appellate Division, First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee, et al.,
3/13/2008	MISSING FROM DOCKET	Docket No. 07 CV 11196 (SAS)
3/14/2008	MISSING FROM DOCKET	Letter to New York Attorney General to reinvestigate prior Iviewit complaints against public office corruption based on the new information in Anderson
3/14/2008	9	ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE. John Anthony Boggs (in his official capacity) served on 3/4/2008, answer due 3/24/2008. Service was accepted by John Anthony Boggs. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein. (djc) (Entered: 03/17/2008)
3/19/2008	10	MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE UNEXECUTED as to Debroah Yarborough (in her official capacity). Attempted Service of Summons and Complaint. Service was attempted on 3/12/08. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually), Eliot I. Bernstein. (pl) (Entered: 03/20/2008)
3/21/2008	11	ORDER: plaintiffs are again reminded that pursuant to Standing Order M10-468, all communications with the Court, including all motions and letters are to be directed to the Court's Pro Se Office, not to chambers. Violation of the Standing Order may lead to a finding of contempt of court. Plaintiffs have requested reconsideration of the Court's Order dated March 7, 2008. The Court declines to revisit its earlier decision. Plaintiffs have also requested legal advice on several topics. The Court does not give legal advice to parties. Plaintiffs have requested legal advice on several topics. The Court does not give legal advice to parties. Plaintiffs have requested that the Court notify the appropriate authorities of defendants' alleged criminal misconduct. At this early stage of the litigation, such notification would be both inappropriate and premature. Finally, plaintiffs have requested permission to make use of the Court's electronic case filing and case management system. At this time, permission to do so is denied. Any further consideration of the substantive issues raised by plaintiffs, including plaintiffs' requests regarding conflicts of interest, must await the resolution of anticipated motions to dismiss. (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 3/21/08) (tro) (Entered: 03/21/2008)
3/21/2008	12	MOTION to Dismiss pursuant to F. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(2) and (6). (Attached is the Declaration of Glenn T. Burhans, Jr., in Support of The Florida Bar Defendants' Motion to Dismiss.) Document filed by The Florida Bar, Lorraine Christine Hoffman (in her individual capacity), Eric Turner (in his official capacity), John Anthony Boggs (in his official capacity), Kenneth Marvin (in his official capacity). (rw) (Entered: 03/24/2008)
3/21/2008	13	MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support of the Florida Bar Defendants' Motion to dismiss the Complaint pursuant to F.R.C.P. 12(b)and (6). Document filed by The Florida Bar, Lorraine Christine Hoffman (in her official capacity), Eric Turner (in his official capacity), John Anthony Boggs (in his official capacity), Kenneth Marvin (in his individual capacity). (jpo) (Entered: 03/24/2008)
3/24/2008	14	ORDER all defendants that seek to move to dismiss must so move and submit memoranda of law no later than May 30, 2008. Plaintiffs' response is due on June 30, 2008. Defendants' reply, if any, is due on July 14, 2008. The parties are reminded that the restrictions on page limits and exhibits detailed in the Court's Individual Rules and Procedures are in effect, and memoranda of law that do not comply with these Rules will be rejected. SO ORDERED. (Responses due by 6/30/2008, Replies due by 7/14/2008.) (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 3/24/2008) (jmi) (Entered: 03/25/2008)
3/24/2008	15	MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Proskauer Rose LLP served on 3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008. Service was accepted by Greg Mashberg. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein. (dle) (Entered: 03/25/2008)
3/24/2008	16	MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Kenneth Rubenstein served on 3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008. Service was accepted by Greg Mashberg. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein. (dle) (Entered: 03/25/2008)
3/24/2008	17	MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Steven C. Krane (in his official capacity) served on 3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008; Steven C. Krane (in his individual capacity) served on 3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008. Service was accepted by Gregg Mashberg. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein. (dle) (Entered: 03/25/2008)
3/24/2008	18	MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Estate of Stephen Kaye served on 3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008. Service was accepted by Gregg Mashberg. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein. (dle) (Entered: 03/25/2008)
3/24/2008	20	MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Mary W. Martelino served on 3/14/2008, answer due 4/3/2008. Service was accepted by Stephen Hall. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein. (dle) (Entered: 03/25/2008)
3/24/2008	21	MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Virginia State Bar served on 3/14/2008, answer due 4/3/2008. Service was accepted by Stephen Hall. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein. (dle) (Entered: 03/25/2008)
3/24/2008	22	MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Noel Sengel (in her official capacity) served on 3/14/2008, answer due 4/3/2008; Noel Sengel (in her individual capacity) served on 3/14/2008, answer due 4/3/2008. Service was accepted by Stephen Hall. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein. (dle) (Entered: 03/25/2008)
3/24/2008	23	MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Andrew H. Goodman (in his official capacity) served on 3/14/2008, answer due 4/3/2008; Andrew H. Goodman (in his individual capacity) served on 3/14/2008, answer due 4/3/2008. Service was accepted by Stephen Hall. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein. (dle) (Entered: 03/25/2008)
3/25/2008	19	FILING ERROR - ELECTRONIC FILING IN NON-ECF CASE - NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by John Walter Fried on behalf of Raymond A. Joao (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit of Service)(Fried, John) Modified on 3/26/2008 (db). (Entered: 03/25/20
3/25/2008	24	NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Monica Anne Connell on behalf of Catherine O'Hagen Wolfe (in their individual capacity), Paul Curran (in their official capacity), Paul Curran (in individual capacity), Martin R. Gold (in his individual capacity), Martin R. Gold (in their official capacity), Angela M. Mazzarelli (in her official capacity), Angela M. Mazzarelli (in her individual capacity), Richard T. Andrias (in his official capacity), Richard T. Andrias (in his individual capacity), David B. Saxe, David B. Saxe, David Friedman (in his official capacity), David Friedman (in his individual capacity), Luiz A. Gonzales (in his official capacity), Luiz A. Gonzales (in his individual capacity), Appellate Division Second Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee, Lawrence DiGiovanna (in his official capacity), Lawrence DiGiovanna (in his individual capacity), Diana Maxfield Kearse (in her official capacity), Diana Maxfield Kearse (in her individual capacity), James E. Peltzer (in his official capacity), James E. Peltzer (in his individual capacity), A. Gail Prudenti (in her official capacity), A. Gail Prudenti (in her individual capacity), Judith S. Kaye, Judith S. Kaye, State of New York Commission of Investigation, Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee, Lawyers Fund for Client Protection of the State of New York, Thomas J. Cahill (in his official capacity), Thomas J. Cahill (in his individual capacity), Joseph Wigley (in his official capacity), Joseph Wigley (in his individual capacity), Catherine O'Hagen Wolfe (in their official capacity) (dle) (Entered: 03/26/2008)
3/26/2008		***NOTE TO ATTORNEY TO RE-FILE DOCUMENT - NON-ECF CASE ERROR. Note to Attorney John Walter Fried to MANUALLY RE-FILE Document Notice of Appearance, Document No. 19. This case is not ECF. (db) (Entered: 03/26/2008)
3/26/2008	25	NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by John Walter Fried on behalf of Raymond A. Joao. (jco) (Entered: 03/27/2008)
3/27/2008	26	MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Michael C. Grebe served on 3/16/2008, answer due 5/30/2008. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein; P. Stephen Lamont. (pl) (Entered: 03/31/2008)
3/27/2008	27	MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Lorraine Christine Hoffman (in her official capacity) served on 3/5/2008, answer due 3/25/2008. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein; P. Stephen Lamont. (pl) (Entered: 03/31/2008)
3/27/2008	28	MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Judith S. Kaye served on 3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein; P. Stephen Lamont. (pl) (Entered: 03/31/2008)
3/27/2008	29	MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Lawyers Fund for Client Protection of the State of New York served on 3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein; P. Stephen Lamont. (pl) (Entered: 03/31/2008)
3/27/2008	30	MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. State of New York Commission of Investigation served on 3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein; P. Stephen Lamont. (pl) (Entered: 03/31/2008)
3/27/2008	31	MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Paul Curran (in individual capacity) served on 3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein; P. Stephen Lamont. (pl) (Entered: 03/31/2008)
3/27/2008	32	MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Angela M. Mazzarelli (in her official capacity) served on 3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein; P. Stephen Lamont. (pl) (Entered: 03/31/2008)
3/27/2008	33	MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. James E. Peltzer (in his official capacity) served on 3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein; P. Stephen Lamont. (pl) (Entered: 03/31/2008)
3/27/2008	34	MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Joseph Wigley (in his official capacity) served on 3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein; P. Stephen Lamont. (pl) (Entered: 03/31/2008)
3/27/2008	35	MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Catherine O'Hagen Wolfe (in their official capacity) served on 3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein; P. Stephen Lamont. (pl) (Entered: 03/31/2008)
3/27/2008	36	MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Richard T. Andrias (in his official capacity) served on 3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein; P. Stephen Lamont. (pl) (Entered: 03/31/2008)
3/27/2008	37	MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Thomas J. Cahill (in his official capacity) served on 3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein; P. Stephen Lamont. (pl) (Entered: 03/31/2008)
3/27/2008	38	MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Diana Maxfield Kearse (in her official capacity) served on 3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein; P. Stephen Lamont. (pl) (Entered: 03/31/2008)
3/27/2008	39	MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. A. Gail Prudenti (in her official capacity) served on 3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein; P. Stephen Lamont. (pl) (Entered: 03/31/2008)
3/27/2008	40	MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Lawrence DiGiovanna (in his official capacity) served on 3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein; P. Stephen Lamont. (pl) (Entered: 03/31/2008)
3/27/2008	41	MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Appellate Division Second Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee served on 3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein; P. Stephen Lamont. (pl) (Entered: 03/31/2008)
3/27/2008	42	MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. David Friedman (in his official capacity) served on 3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein; P. Stephen Lamont. (pl) (Entered: 03/31/2008)
3/27/2008	43	MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Luiz A. Gonzales (in his official capacity) served on 3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein; P. Stephen Lamont. (pl) (Entered: 03/31/2008)
3/27/2008	44	MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Kenneth Marvin (in his official capacity) served on 3/17/2008, answer due 4/7/2008. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein; P. Stephen Lamont. (pl) (Entered: 03/31/2008)
3/27/2008	45	MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee served on 3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein; P. Stephen Lamont. (pl) (Entered: 03/31/2008)
03/28/2008	MISSING FROM DOCKET	Scheindlin Order regarding Foley Acting as Counsel
3/31/2008	46	ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Judge Shira A. Scheindlin from Kent K. Anker dated 3/28/2008 re: Requesting that defendants Foley & Lardner LLP, Steven C. Becker, Douglas A. Boehm, William J. Dick, and Michael W. Grebe be granted an extension of time to respond to plaintiffs' complaint. ENDORSEMENT: Defendants request is granted. Plaintiffs response is due June 30, 2008, Defendants' reply is due July 14, 2008. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 3/28/2008) (jpo) (Entered: 03/31/2008)
4/1/2008	MISSING FROM DOCKET	Motion in Opposition to Florida Bar Motion to Dismiss Part 1 - Conflicts
04/07/2008	47	MOTION to Allow Filling of an Amend/Correct 1 Complaint. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually), Eliot I. Bernstein. (jmi) (Entered: 04/08/2008)
04/07/2008	48	MOTION in Opposition to Defendants re: 12 MOTION to Dismiss Based on Material and Substantial Evidence. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually), Eliot I. Bernstein. (jmi) (Entered: 04/08/2008)
4/7/2008		Motion in Opposition to Florida Bar Motion to Dismiss Part 2
04/08/2008	49 Missing Document	ORDER: The Court has received a document styled "opposition to Defendants Motion to dismiss." from plaintiffs. This document was apparently sent directly to Chambers, not to the Courts Pro Se Office. Because plaintiffs have failed to comply with the Court's standing order this document is rejected. If plaintiff seeks to file a motion they must do so through the Court's Pro SE Office. The time for defendants to move to dismiss is extended to May 30, 2008, plaintiffs response is due by June 30, 2008 Defendants reply is due July 14, 2008. (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 4/8/2008) (jpo) (Entered: 04/09/2008 )
04/11/2008	50	MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Raymond A. Joao served on 3/25/2008, answer due 5/30/2008. Service was accepted by John W. Fried. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein. (dle) (Entered: 04/11/2008)
04/11/2008	51	MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. William J. Dick served on 3/25/2008, answer due 5/30/2008. Service was accepted by William J. Dick. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein. (dle) (Entered: 04/11/2008)
04/11/2008	52	MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Douglas A. Boehm served on 3/24/2008, answer due 5/30/2008. Service was accepted by Douglas Boehm. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein. (dle) (Entered: 04/11/2008)
04/11/2008	53	MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Steven C. Becker served on 3/24/2008, answer due 5/30/2008. Service was accepted by Steven Becker. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein. (dle) (Entered: 04/11/2008)
04/11/2008	54	MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Foley Lardner LLP served on 3/20/2008, answer due 5/30/2008. Service was accepted by James R. Clark. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein. (dle) (Entered: 04/11/2008)
04/15/2000	NOT DOCKETED	FINAL SENT TO COURT and Letter to Virginia Bar Counsel Attorney General Hall re phone conversation and conflicts
4/15/2008	NOT DOCKETED	Proskauer Request to not be served via email
04/15/2008	55	ORDER that the Court has received plaintiffs' request to file an Amended Complaint. Plaintiffs' request is granted. The Amended Complaint must be filed no later than 5/10/08. Notwithstanding the filing of the Amended Complaint, defendants' deadline to move to dismiss or file an Answer remains 5/30/08. Plaintiffs' response remains due on 6/30/08. Defendants' reply, if any, remains due on 7/14/08. The parties are again reminded that the restrictions on page limits and exhibits detailed in the Court's Individual Rules and Procedures are in effect, and memoranda of law that do not comply with these Rules will be rejected. (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 4/14/08) (dle) (Entered: 04/15/2008)
04/21/2008	Not Docketed	20080421 FINAL SIGNED Motion for Pro Bono Counsel
04/22/2008	Not Docketed	Friedkin Anker for Foley Deny Email Service
04/24/2008	56	MOTION for Stephen Hall to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Document filed by Virginia State Bar, Andrew H. Goodman (in his official capacity), Andrew H. Goodman (in his individual capacity), Noel Sengel (in her official capacity), Noel Sengel (in her individual capacity), Mary W. Martelino. (dle) (Entered: 04/25/2008)
04/29/2008	n/a	CASHIERS OFFICE REMARK on 56 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, in the amount of $25.00, paid on 04/24/2008, Receipt Number 649058. (jd) (Entered: 04/29/2008)
05/02/2008	NOT DOCKETED	Foley Anker Appearance and letter re Conflicts
05/02/2008	NOT DOCKETED	Foley Anker to Bernstein to stop contacting Foley
05/02/2008	57	DECLARATION of Kent K. Anker RESPONSE to Plaintiffs' Motion for Pro Bono Counsel. Document filed by Foley Lardner LLP, Michael C. Grebe, William J. Dick, Douglas A. Boehm, Steven C. Becker. (jmi) (Entered: 05/05/2008)
05/02/2008	58	RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by Foley Lardner LLP, Michael C. Grebe, William J. Dick, Douglas A. Boehm, Steven C. Becker. (jmi) (Entered: 05/05/2008)
05/02/2008	59	NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Lili Zandpour, Kent Kari Anker on behalf of Foley Lardner LLP, Michael C. Grebe, William J. Dick, Douglas A. Boehm, Steven C. Becker (jmi) (Entered: 05/05/2008)
05/09/2008	NOT DOCKETED	Proskauer letter to Scheindlin to block service of amended complaint
05/09/2008	60	ORDER: Service of any amended complaint will be stayed until such time as the scheduled motions to dismiss have been decided. Accordingly, the time for newly named defendants to respond to the Complaint is hereby stayed until after the Court has ruled on those motions. This Order is subject to reconsideration upon receipt of opposition, if any, from plaintiffs. (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 5/9/08) (tro) (Entered: 05/12/2008)
05/12/2008	61	NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Joanna Frances Smith on behalf of Steven C. Krane (in his individual capacity), Kenneth Rubenstein, Proskauer Rose LLP (pl) (Entered: 05/13/2008)
05/12/2008	62	MOTION for a pro se office to copy and transmit amended complaint to U.S. Marshal's Office. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually), P. Stephen Lamont. (pl) (Entered: 05/13/2008)
05/13/2008	63	ORDER granting 56 Motion for Stephen M. Hall to Appear Pro Hac Vice. (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 5/13/08) (mme) (Entered: 05/13/2008)
05/12/2008	87 Note number totally out of order and no new defendants added	AMENDED COMPLAINT amending 1 Complaint,,,,,,,,,,, against Catherine O'Hagen Wolfe(in their individual capacity), Paul Curran(in their official capacity), Paul Curran(in individual capacity), Martin R. Gold(in his individual capacity), Martin R. Gold(in thier offical capacity), Angela M. Mazzarelli(in her official capacity), Angela M. Mazzarelli(in her individual capacity), Richard T. Andrias(in his official capacity), Richard T. Andrias(in his individual capacity), David B. Saxe, David B. Saxe, David Friedman(in his official capacity), David Friedman(in his individual capacity), Luiz A. Gonzales(in his official capacity), Luiz A. Gonzales(in his individual capacity), Appellate Division Second Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee, Lawrence DiGiovanna(in his official capacity), Lawrence DiGiovanna(in his individual capacity), Diana Maxfield Kearse(in her official capacity), Diana Maxfield Kearse(in her individual capacity), James E. Peltzer(in his offical capacity), James E. Peltzer(in his individual capcity), A. Gail Prudenti(in her offical capacity), A. Gail Prudenti(in her individual capacity), Steven C. Krane(in his official capacity), Steven C. Krane(in his individual capacity), Judith S. Kaye, Judith S. Kaye, Kenneth Rubenstein, Estate of Stephen Kaye, Proskauer Rose LLP, Meltzer Lippe Goldstein & Breistone LLP, Lewis S. Meltzer, Raymond A. Joao, Foley Lardner LLP, Michael C. Grebe, William J. Dick, Douglas A. Boehm, Steven C. Becker, State of New York Commission of Investigation, Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee, Lawyers Fund for Client Protection of the State of New York, The Florida Bar, Lorraine Christine Hoffman(in her official capacity), Lorraine Christine Hoffman(in her individual capacity), Eric Turner(in his official capacity), Eric Turner(in his individual capacity), John Anthony Boggs(in his official capacity), John Anthony Boggs(in his individual capacity), Kenneth Marvin(in his official capacity), Kenneth Marvin(in his individual capacity), Thomas J. Cahill(in his official capacity), Thomas Hall(in his official capacity), Thomas Hall(in his individual capacity), Debroah Yarborough(in her official capacity), Debroah Yarborough(in her individual capacity), Virginia State Bar, Andrew H. Goodman(in his official capacity), Andrew H. Goodman(in his individual capacity), Noel Sengel(in her official capacity), Noel Sengel(in her individual capacity), Mary W. Martelino, Thomas J. Cahill(in his individual capacity), John Does, Joseph Wigley(in his official capacity), Joseph Wigley(in his individual capacity), Catherine O'Hagen Wolfe(in their official capacity).Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein(Individually), Eliot I. Bernstein, P. Stephen Lamont. Related document: 1 Complaint,,,,,,,,,,, filed by P. Stephen Lamont, Eliot I. Bernstein.(dle) (Entered: 07/03/2008)
05/13/2008	NOT DOCKETED	Request for Clarification on Order dated May 9th 2008
05/13/2008	NOT DOCKETED	Proskauer Request for Amended Complaint
05/13/2008	NOT DOCKETED	Scheindlin Order Denying Pro Se Copying
05/14/2008	64	MEMO ENDORSEMENT on re: 62 MOTION for a pro se office to copy and transmit amended complaint to U.S. Marshal's Office. filed by P. Stephen Lamont, Eliot I. Bernstein ENDORSEMENT; In accordance with this court's order dated May 9, 2008, service of any amended complaint is stayed until such the as the scheduled motions to dismiss are decided. Plaintiff's motion is therefore denied with leave to renew after that time. (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 5/13/08) (mme) (Entered: 05/14/2008)
05/22/2008	65	MOTION IN OPPOSITION TO 60 STAY ORDER dated 5/9/08 - REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION ORDER. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually), Eliot I. Bernstein, P. Stephen Lamont. (db) (Entered: 05/22/2008)
05/28/2008	NOT DOCKETED	Court returns Motion for Pro Bono to Refile
05/28/2008	66	MOTION for an order of dismissal, under FRCP Rule 12 dismissing the Complaint in this action as to the Virginia Defendants in its entirety. Document filed by Virginia State Bar, Andrew H. Goodman (in his official capacity), Andrew H. Goodman (in his individual capacity), Noel Sengel (in her official capacity), Noel Sengel (in her individual capacity), Mary W. Martelino. (dle) (Entered: 05/29/2008)
05/28/2008	67	MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 66 MOTION to Dismiss. Document filed by Virginia State Bar, Andrew H. Goodman (in his official capacity), Andrew H. Goodman (in his individual capacity), Noel Sengel (in her official capacity), Noel Sengel (in her individual capacity), Mary W. Martelino. (dle) (Entered: 05/29/2008)
05/30/2008	68	MOTION for an order pursuant to F.R.C.P. 12(b)(2) and (6) to Dismiss the Amended Complaint; w/ attch. Declaration in support. Document filed by Lorraine Christine Hoffman (in her official capacity), Eric Turner (in his official capacity), John Anthony Boggs (in his official capacity), Kenneth Marvin (in his official capacity). (pl) (Entered: 05/30/2008)
05/30/2008	69	MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 68 MOTION to Dismiss.. Document filed by Lorraine Christine Hoffman (in her official capacity), John Anthony Boggs (in his official capacity), Kenneth Marvin (in his official capacity, et al. (pl) (Entered: 05/30/2008)
05/30/2008	70	FILING ERROR - ELECTRONIC FILING IN NON-ECF CASE - CROSS MOTION to Dismiss Complaint. Document filed by Meltzer Lippe Goldstein & Breistone LLP, Lewis S. Meltzer. (Howard, Richard) Modified on 6/2/2008 (KA). (Entered: 05/30/2008) old entry below CROSS MOTION to Dismiss Complaint. Document filed by Meltzer Lippe Goldstein & Breistone LLP, Lewis S. Meltzer. (Howard, Richard) (Entered: 05/30/2008)
05/30/2008	71	FILING ERROR - ELECTRONIC FILING IN NON-ECF CASE - AFFIDAVIT of Richard M. Howard, Esq. in Support re: 70 CROSS MOTION to Dismiss Complaint. Document filed by Meltzer Lippe Goldstein & Breistone LLP, Lewis S. Meltzer. (Howard, Richard) Modified on 6/2/2008 (KA). (Entered: 05/30/2008) old entry AFFIDAVIT of Richard M. Howard, Esq. in Support re: 70 CROSS MOTION to Dismiss Complaint.. Document filed by Meltzer Lippe Goldstein & Breistone LLP, Lewis S. Meltzer. (Howard, Richard) (Entered: 05/30/2008)
05/30/2008	72	FILING ERROR - ELECTRONIC FILING IN NON-ECF CASE - AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of Notice of Cross Motion with Affidavit in Support served on Elliot I. Bernstein, P. Stephen Lamont, Monica Connell, Esq., Gregg M. Mashberg, Esq., Glenn T. Burhans, Jr., Esq., John W. Fried, Esq. on May 30, 2008. Service was made by Mail. Document filed by Meltzer Lippe Goldstein & Breistone LLP, Lewis S. Meltzer. (Howard, Richard) Modified on 6/2/2008 (KA). (Entered: 05/30/2008) old entry AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of Notice of Cross Motion with Affidavit in Support served on Eliot I. Bernstein, P. Stephen Lamont, Monica Connell, Esq., Gregg M. Mashberg, Esq., Glenn T. Burhans, Jr., Esq., John W. Fried, Esq. on May 30, 2008. Service was made by Mail. Document filed by Meltzer Lippe Goldstein & Breistone LLP, Lewis S. Meltzer. (Howard, Richard) (Entered: 05/30/2008)
05/30/2008	73	MOTION to Dismiss the Amended Complaint. Document filed by State of New York Commission of Investigation et al. (cd) (Entered: 06/02/2008)
05/30/2008	74	MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 73 MOTION to Dismiss.. Document filed by State of New York Commission of Investigation et al. (cd) (Entered: 06/02/2008) and Exhibit Court Case
05/30/2008	75	MOTION for an order pursuant to Rules 8 (a)(2), 9(b), 12(b)(1), and 12(b)(6), of the F.R.C.P. to Dismiss the Amended Complaint. Document filed by Raymond A. Joao. (pl) (Entered: 06/02/2008)
05/30/2008	76	MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 75 MOTION to Dismiss. Document filed by Raymond A. Joao. (pl) (Entered: 06/02/2008)
05/30/2008	77	DECLARATION of John W. Fried in Support re: 75 MOTION to Dismiss.. Document filed by Raymond A. Joao. (pl) (Entered: 06/02/2008)
05/30/2008	78	MOTION to Dismiss the Complaint and Amended Complaint, with prejudice. Document filed by Steven C. Krane (in his individual capacity), Kenneth Rubenstein, Estate of Stephen Kaye, Proskauer Rose LLP. (cd) (Entered: 06/02/2008)
05/30/2008	79	DECLARATION of Joanna Smith in Support re: 78 MOTION to Dismiss. Document filed by Steven C. Krane (in his official capacity), Kenneth Rubenstein, Estate of Stephen Kaye, Proskauer Rose LLP. (cd) (Entered: 06/02/2008)
05/30/2008	80	MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 78 MOTION to Dismiss. Document filed by Steven C. Krane (in his individual capacity), Kenneth Rubenstein, Estate of Stephen Kaye, Proskauer Rose LLP. (cd) (Entered: 06/02/2008)
05/30/2008	81	MOTION for an order pursuant to F.R.C.P. 9(b) and 12(b)(b) dismissing the original and amended complaints. Document filed by Foley Lardner LLP, Michael C. Grebe, William J. Dick, Douglas A. Boehm, Steven C. Becker.(pl) (Entered: 06/02/2008)
05/30/2008	82	DECLARATION of Lili Zandpour in Support re: 81 MOTION to Dismiss.. Document filed by Foley Lardner LLP, Michael C. Grebe, William J. Dick, Douglas A. Boehm, Steven C. Becker. (pl) (Entered: 06/02/2008)
05/31/2008	NOT DOCKETED	Rule 26 Letter to Anker Foley Rule 26 Letter to Connell NYAG Rule 26 Letter to Fried Rule 26 Letter to Greenberg Traurig & Florida Supreme Court & Florida Bar Rule 26 Letter to Meltzer Rule 26 Letter to Proskauer Rule 26 Letter to Virginia Bar Hall
06/02/2008		***NOTE TO ATTORNEY TO RE-FILE DOCUMENT - NON-ECF CASE ERROR. Note to Attorney Richard M. Howard to MANUALLY RE-FILE Document Cross-Motion to Dismiss Complaint, Document No. 70. This case is not ECF. (KA) (Entered: 06/02/2008)
06/02/2008		***NOTE TO ATTORNEY TO RE-FILE DOCUMENT - NON-ECF CASE ERROR. Note to Attorney Richard M. Howard to MANUALLY RE-FILE Document Affidavit in Support of Motion, Document No. 71. This case is not ECF. (KA) (Entered: 06/02/2008)
06/02/2008		***NOTE TO ATTORNEY TO RE-FILE DOCUMENT - NON-ECF CASE ERROR. Note to Attorney Richard M. Howard to MANUALLY RE-FILE Document Affidavit of Service, Document No. 72. This case is not ECF. (KA) (Entered: 06/02/2008)
06/03/2008	NOT DOCKETED	20080603 Anker Foley Rule 26 Response
06/03/2008	83	CROSS-MOTION to Dismiss plaintiffs' complaint purs to FRCP Rule 12(b)(6). Attached is Affidavit. Document filed by Meltzer Lippe Goldstein & Breistone LLP, Lewis S. Meltzer. (djc) Modified on 6/5/2008 (djc). (Entered: 06/05/2008)
06/06/2008	NOT DOCKETED	Court return of Motion to Dismiss Response filed in error supposedly
06/06/2008	85 Note out of order	MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO MOTIONS TO DISMISS DUE TO EXTRANEOUS CIRCUMSTANCES AND POSSIBLE ABUSE OF PROCESS AND REQUESTS COURT TO REVISIT PRO BONO COUNSEL. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually), P. Stephen Lamont. (pl) (Entered: 06/11/2008)
06/09/2008	84 WRONG CASE Note out of order and not part of this case but related Esposito case	DECLARATION OF SERVICE of Motion to dismiss dated 5/30/08, the Declaration of Monica A. Connell and State Defendants Memorandum in support of Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint served on Pro Se Plaintiff, Attorneys for Harvey Gladstein & Partners, Attorneys for Alan Isaac, and Attorneys for the City defendants on 5/30/08. Service was made by Federal Express. [this looks like entry from a related case but the following text is from this case and Hoffman is not involved in other case???] Document filed by Lorraine Christine Hoffman (in her individual capacity). (pl) Modified on 6/10/2008 (pl). (Entered: 06/10/2008)
06/16/2008	WRONG CASE, ENTERS MY CASE INFO INTO ANDERSON DOCKET	Anderson Docket with Eliot as Plaintiff????
06/18/2008	86	ORDER: Plaintiff's moved (doc. #85), for an extension of time to respond to the Motions to Dismiss. Plaintiffs responses due 7/14/08. Defendants replies due 7/28/08. NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS WILL BE GRANTED. Set Deadlines/Hearing as to 73 MOTION to Dismiss. 83 MOTION to Dismiss. 68 MOTION to Dismiss. 78 MOTION to Dismiss. 75 MOTION to Dismiss. 81 MOTION to Dismiss. 66 MOTION to Dismiss: (Responses due by 7/14/2008, Replies due by 7/28/2008.) (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 6/17/07) (db) (Entered: 06/18/2008)
07/03/2008	88	MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Amended Complaint served. Thomas Hall (in his individual capacity) served on 6/6/2008, answer due 6/26/2008. Service was accepted by Vickie Vanlith, Administrative Assistant. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually). (pl) (Entered: 07/07/2008)
07/07/2008	89	MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Amended Complaint served. The Florida Bar served on 6/6/2008, answer due 6/26/2008. Service was accepted by Jack Harkness-Executive Director. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually). (pl) (Entered: 07/07/2008)
07/14/2008	NOT DOCKETED	Letter to Judge Scheindlin Regarding Emergency Situation
07/14/2008	90	OPPOSITION/RESPONSE to Motion re: 83 MOTION to Dismiss. Document filed by P. Stephen Lamont. (djc) (Entered: 07/15/2008)
07/14/2008	91	OPPOSITION/RESPONSE to Motion re: 75 MOTION to Dismiss. Document filed by P. Stephen Lamont. (djc) (Entered: 07/15/2008)
07/14/2008	92	Co-Plaintiff Lamont's Opposition to the Sate Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. (djc) (Entered: 07/15/2008)
07/14/2008	93	opposition/RESPONSE to Motion re: 78 MOTION to Dismiss.. Document filed by P. Stephen Lamont. (djc) (Entered: 07/15/2008)
07/14/2008	94	OPPOSITION/RESPONSE to Motion re: 81 MOTION to Dismiss.. Document filed by P. Stephen Lamont. (djc) (Entered: 07/15/2008)
07/14/2008	95	RESPONSE to Motion re: 12 MOTION to Dismiss. Document filed by P. Stephen Lamont. (djc) (Entered: 07/15/2008)
07/14/2008	96	OPPOSITION RESPONSE to Motion re: 66 MOTION to Dismiss.. Document filed by P. Stephen Lamont. (djc) (Entered: 07/15/2008)
07/15/2008	97	MOTION for Extension of Time To File Responsive Pleadings to Motions to Dismiss & Opposition to Motions to Dismiss; attached are papers in support. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually).(cd) (Entered: 07/17/2008)
07/17/2008	98	ORDER: It is hereby stipulated and agreed that the Clerk's Certificate obtained by plaintiff is vacated. (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 7/17/2008) (jpo) (Entered: 07/17/2008)
07/16/2008	99	MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Amended Complaint, served. Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee served on 6/19/2008, answer due 7/9/2008. Service was accepted by Tom McGowan. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein; P. Stephen Lamont. (jpo) (Entered: 07/21/2008)
07/16/2008	100	MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Amended Complaint served. Meltzer Lippe Goldstein & Breistone LLP served on 6/19/2008, answer due 7/9/2008. Service was accepted by Tom McGowan. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein. (tro) (Entered: 07/21/2008)
07/18/2008	NOT DOCKETED	FINAL SIGNED Opposition to Proskauer latter dated July 17 2008
07/24/2008	101	REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW ON BEHALF of Defendants Lewis and MLGB Document filed by Meltzer Lippe Goldstein & Breistone LLP, Lewis S. Meltzer. (djc) (Entered: 07/25/2008)
07/28/2008	102	REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 75 MOTION to Dismiss.. Document filed by Raymond A. Joao. (pl) (Entered: 07/29/2008)
07/28/2008	103	REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 81 MOTION to Dismiss.. Document filed by Foley Lardner LLP, Michael C. Grebe, William J. Dick, Douglas A. Boehm, Steven C. Becker. (pl) (Entered: 07/29/2008)
07/28/2008	104	SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION of Joanna Smith in Support re: 78 MOTION to Dismiss. Document filed by Steven C. Krane (in his official capacity), Kenneth Rubenstein. (pl) (Entered: 07/29/2008)
07/28/2008	105	REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 78 MOTION to Dismiss.. Document filed by Steven C. Krane (in his official capacity), Kenneth Rubenstein. (pl) (Entered: 07/29/2008)
08/01/2008	106	ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Judge Schira A. Scheindlin from P. Stephen Lamont dated 7/29/08 re: Request for leave to file a sur reply. ENDORSEMENT: Plaintiff's request to file a sur-reply is denied. (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 8/1/08) (cd) (Entered: 08/04/2008)
08/08/2008	107	OPINION AND ORDER that for the reasons stated above, defendants' motions to dismiss are granted. The remaining defendants are dismissed sua sponte. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close these and related motions (documents no. 12,47,48,65,66,68,73,75,78,81,83, and 97 on the docket sheet) and this case re: 75 MOTION to Dismiss, filed by Raymond A. Joao, 47 MOTION to Amend/Correct 1 Complaint, filed by Eliot I. Bernstein, 66 MOTION to Dismiss, filed by Andrew H. Goodman, Virginia State Bar, Noel Sengel, Mary W. Martelino, 83 MOTION to Dismiss, filed by Meltzer Lippe Goldstein & Breistone LLP, Lewis S. Meltzer, 68 MOTION to Dismiss, filed by Eric Turner, Lorraine Christine Hoffman, Kenneth Marvin, John Anthony Boggs, 48 MOTION in Opposition to Defendants Motionto Dismiss Based on Material and Substantial Evidence re: 12 MOTION to Dismiss, filed by Eliot I. Bernstein, 97 MOTION for Extension of Time, filed by Eliot I. Bernstein, 73 MOTION to Dismiss, filed by State of New York Commission of Investigation, 81 MOTION to Dismiss, filed by Michael C. Grebe, Foley Lardner LLP, William J. Dick, Douglas A. Boehm, Steven C. Becker, 12 MOTION to Dismiss, filed by Eric Turner, Lorraine Christine Hoffman, Kenneth Marvin, John Anthony Boggs, The Florida Bar, 65 MOTION re: 60 Order, filed by P. Stephen Lamont, Eliot I. Bernstein, 78 MOTION to Dismiss, filed by Proskauer Rose LLP, Kenneth Rubenstein, Estate of Stephen Kaye, Steven C. Krane. (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 8/8/08) Copies sent by chambers.(cd) (Entered: 08/11/2008)
08/08/2008		Transmission to Judgments and Orders Clerk. Transmitted re: 107 Memorandum & Opinion, to the Judgments and Orders Clerk. (cd) (Entered: 08/11/2008)
08/08/2008		SCHEINDLIN DISMISSAL OF 6 RELATED CASES TO ANDERSON
08/08/2008		Transmission to Judgments and Orders Clerk. Transmitted re: 107 Memorandum & Opinion, to the Judgments and Orders Clerk. (cd) (Entered: 08/11/2008)
08/19/2008	108	ORDER: Plaintiffs move for reconsideration of the Opinion and Order dated 8/8/08, in which this Court granted certain defendants' motions to dismiss and dismissed all other defendants sua sponte. The federal courts are simply not the appropriate forum for plaintiffs to seek redress of these grievances. Plaintiffs have not identified any material facts or law overlooked by the Court. Reconsideration is there denied. (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 8/19/08) (tro) (Entered: 08/19/2008)
08/19/2008	109	MOTION for Reconsideration and Modification of the Court's August 8,2008 re; 107 Memorandum & Opinion. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually), Eliot I. Bernstein. (jmi) (Entered: 09/11/2008)
09/04/2008	112	NOTICE OF APPEAL from 107 Memorandum & Opinion. Document filed by P. Stephen Lamont. Filing fee $ 455.00, receipt number E 662193. Copies mailed to attorney(s) of record: Attorney General, NYS. (tp) (Entered: 09/30/2008)
09/05/2008	111	NOTICE OF APPEAL from 107 Memorandum & Opinion. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein. Copies mailed to attorney(s) of record: Attorney General, NYS. (tp) (Entered: 09/30/2008) Notice of Appeal & Extension of Time Motion for Extension to File Appeal
09/05/2008		Appeal Remark as to 111 Notice of Appeal filed by Eliot I. Bernstein. $455.00 APPEAL FEE DUE. (tp) (Entered: 09/30/2008)
09/23/2008	110	MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Amended Complaint served. Eric Turner (in his official capacity) served on 8/13/2008, answer due 9/2/2008; Eric Turner (in his individual capacity) served on 8/13/2008, answer due 9/2/2008. Service was made by MAIL. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein. (js) (Entered: 09/24/2008)
09/30/2008		Transmission of Notice of Appeal and Certified Copy of Docket Sheet to US Court of Appeals re: 111 Notice of Appeal. (tp) (Entered: 09/30/2008)
09/30/2008		Transmission of Notice of Appeal to the District Judge re: 111 Notice of Appeal. (tp) (Entered: 09/30/2008)
09/30/2008		Transmission of Notice of Appeal to the District Judge re: 111 Notice of Appeal. (tp) (Entered: 09/30/2008)
09/30/2008		Transmission of Notice of Appeal to the District Judge re: 112 Notice of Appeal. (tp) (Entered: 09/30/2008)
10/02/2008	113	Appeal Record Sent to USCA (Index). Notice that the Original index to the record on Appeal for 111 Notice of Appeal filed by Eliot I. Bernstein 3 Copies of the index, Certified Clerk Certificate and Certified Docket Sheet were transmitted to the U.S. Court of Appeals. (nd) (tp). (Entered: 10/02/2008)
10/02/2008		Appeal Record Sent to USCA (File). Indexed record on Appeal Files for 111 Notice of Appeal filed by Eliot I. Bernstein were transmitted to the U.S. Court of Appeals. (Total of 4 volumes sent to USCA on 10/3/2008). (nd) (Entered: 10/02/2008)
10/02/2008	114	Appeal Record Sent to USCA (Index). Notice that the Original index to the record on Appeal for 112 Notice of Appeal filed by P. Stephen Lamont 3 Copies of the index, Certified Clerk Certificate and Certified Docket Sheet were transmitted to the U.S. Court of Appeals. (nd) (tp). (Entered: 10/02/2008)
10/02/2008		Appeal Record Sent to USCA (File). Indexed record on Appeal Files for 112 Notice of Appeal filed by P. Stephen Lamont were transmitted to the U.S. Court of Appeals. (nd) (Entered: 10/02/2008)
10/08/2008		USCA Case Number 08-4873-cv from the US Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit assigned to 112 Notice of Appeal filed by P. Stephen Lamont. (nd) (Entered: 10/08/2008)

United States Patents	Foreign Patents	Trademarks
09/630,939 System & Method for Providing an Enhanced Digital Image File SUSPENDED BY COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS February 17, 2004	PCT/US00/21211 System & Method for Providing an Enhanced Digital Image File WIPO LINK	75/725,802 THE CLICK HEARD 'ROUND THE WORLD June 8, 1999 FILED July 27, 2004
09/630,939 System & Method for Providing an Enhanced Digital Image File SUSPENDED BY COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS February 17, 2004	PCT/US00/15602 System & Method for Video Playback Over a Network WIPO LINK	75/725,805 IVIEWIT "YOUR THIRD EYE TO THE WORLD" June 8, 1999 FILED July 27, 2004
09/630,939 System & Method for Providing an Enhanced Digital Image File SUSPENDED BY COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS February 17, 2004	PCT/US00/15406 System & Method for Playing a Digital Video File WIPO LINK (Where did this go???) 15406 Part 1 Attachment 15406 Part 2 Attachment 15406 Part 3 Attachment	75/725,806 IVIEWIT "YOUR THIRD EYE TO THE WORLD" June 8, 1999 FILED July 27, 2004
09/522,721 Apparatus & Method for Producing Enhanced Digital Images PENDING SUSPENSION FILED February 26, 2004	PCT US00/15408 System & Method for Streaming an Enhanced Digital Video File WIPO LINK (Where did this go???)	75/725,807 IVIEWIT 'YOUR THIRD EYE TO THE WORLD" (THIS MARK IS MISSING PROPER QUOTES June 8, 1999 FILED July 27, 2004
09/587,734 System & Method for Providing an Enhanced Digital Video File SUSPENDED BY COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS February 26, 2004	PCT/US00/15405 System & Method for Providing an Enhanced Digital Video File WIPO LINK(Where did this go???)	75/725,808 IVIEWIT "YOUR THIRD EYE TO THE WORLD June 8, 1999 FILED July 27, 2004
09/587,734 System & Method for Providing an Enhanced Digital Video File SUSPENDED BY COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS February 26, 2004	PCT US00/07772 Apparatus & Method for Producing Enhanced Digital Images WIPO LINK (Where did this go???)	75/725,809 IVIEWIT "YOUR THIRD EYE TO THE WORLD June 8, 1999 FILED July 27, 2004
09/587,026 System & Method for Playing a Digital Video File SUSPENDED BY COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS February 26, 2004	EPO 00938126.0 System & Method for Streaming an Enhanced Digital Video File	75/725,810 IVIEWIT "YOUR THIRD EYE TO THE WORLD June 8, 1999 FILED July 27, 2004
09/587,730 System & Method for Streaming an Enhanced Digital Video File SUSPENDED BY COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS February 26, 2004	EPO 00944619.6 System & Method for Streaming an Enhanced Digital Video File	75/725,816 IVIEWIT.COM June 8, 1999 FILED July 27, 2004
60/223,344 Zoom & Pan Using a Digital Camera	EPO 00955352.0 System & Method for Providing an Enhanced Digital Image File	75/725,816 IVIEWIT June 8, 1999 FILED July 27, 2004
60/233,341 Zoom & Pan Imaging Design Tool	Japan 2001 502364 System & Method for Streaming an Enhanced Digital Video File	75/725,817 IVIEWIT.COM June 8, 1999 FILED July 27, 2004
60,169,559 Apparatus and Method for Producing Enhanced Video Images and/or Video Files	Japan 2001 502362 System & Method for Streaming an Enhanced Digital Video File	75/725,817 IVIEWIT June 8, 1999 FILED July 27, 2004
60/155,404 Apparatus & Method for Producing Enhanced Video Images and/or Video Files	Japan 2001 514379 System & Method for Providing an Enhanced Digital Image File	75/725,818 IVIEWIT.COM June 8, 1999 FILED July 27, 2004
60/149,737 Apparatus and Method for Producing Enhanced Digital Images and/or Digital Video Files	Korea PCT US00 15408	75/725,819 THE CLICK HEARD 'ROUND THE WORLD June 8, 1999 FILED July 27, 2004
60/146,726 Apparatus & Method for Producing Enhanced Digital Images		75/725,819 IVIEWIT.COM June 8, 1999 FILED July 27, 2004
60/141,440 Apparatus & Method for Providing and/or transmitting Video Data and/or Information in a Communication Network		75/725,820 IVIEWIT.COM June 8, 1999 FILED July 27, 2004
60/137,921 Apparatus & Method for Playing Video Files Across the Internet		75/725,821 IVIEWIT June 8, 1999 FILED July 27, 2004
60/137,297 Apparatus & Method for Producing Enhanced Video Images		75/725,821 THE CLICK HEARD 'ROUND THE WORLD June 8, 1999 FILED July 27, 2004
60/125,824 Apparatus & Method for Producing Enhanced Digital Images		75/725,822 IVIEWIT June 8, 1999 FILED July 27, 2004
		75/725,823 IVIEWIT June 8, 1999 FILED July 27, 2004
		75/725,823 THE CLICK HEARD 'ROUND THE WORLD June 8, 1999 FILED July 27, 2004
		76/037,700 IVIEWIT.COM May 1, 2000 FILED July 27, 2004
		76/037,701 A SITE FOR SORE EYES May 1, 2000 FILED July 27, 2004
		76/037,702 A SITE FOR SORE EYES May 1, 2000 FILED July 27, 2004
		76/037,703 IVIEWIT May 1, 2000 FILED July 27, 2004
		76/037,843 IVIEWIT LOGO May 1, 2000 FILED July 27, 2004
		76/037,844 May 1, 2000 FILED July 27, 2004

ELLEN G. WHITE

U.S. District Court United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Foley Square) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:07-cv-11196-SAS

U.S. District Court
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Foley Square)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:07-cv-11196-SAS