Surf with Vision

IVIEWIT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

[ Home ] ABOUT ] COMPANY ] FINANCIAL INFO ] INVENTORS ] PRESS ] PRESS ROOM ] PRODUCTS ] SUPREME COURT ] VIDEO GALLERY ] IMAGE GALLERY ] SENATE CULT BILL ] The Fight for the Grail ] Research ] Iviewit Blogoshpere ]

Patent Filings / US District Court Docket / US Court of Appeal Docket / Court Evidence Exhibits

WARNING!! DANGER WILL ROBINSON!!!  INVENTOR CAR BOMBED IRAQI STYLE

           

Scroll down home page for more and more of the Greatest Patent Story Ever Told

NOTE THAT INVENTOR BERNSTEIN'S MINIVAN WAS BLOWN UP WITH A BOMB ACCORDING TO FIRE INVESTIGATOR RICK LEE OF THE BOYNTON BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT.  SO POWERFUL IT BLEW UP THE CARS NEXT TO IT.

            

NOTE - THAT IS WHERE THE KIDS WOULD HAVE BEEN SITTING ONLY A FEW HOURS LATER

 

TRY VIEWING THE CAR BOMB IMAGES WITH IVIEWIT ZOOM TECHNOLOGY ~ Click Here


WARNING!
TO THOSE INTERESTED OR THINKING OF BECOMING INVOLVED IN THE IVIEWIT CRIMES ~ WITH THE BOMBING OF THE INVENTORS CAR, THE CHARGES FOR THE HEREIN DESCRIBED STATE, FEDERAL AND INTERNATIONAL CRIMES FOR BOTH PERPETRATORS AND ACCOMPLICES REGARDING THE PATENT THEFTS AND VIOLATIONS OF PUBLIC OFFICES, HAVE NOW ELEVATED TO
ATTEMPTED MURDER and according to Federal Judge Shira Scheindlin the Case is about MURDER!!!

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Breaking News

INDICTMENTS COMING! US Senator John Sampson Former Head of the New York Democratic Party and Chairman of the New York Senate Judiciary Committee was Threatened & Bribed to Cover Up NY & Federal Corruption!!

UPDATE - INDICTMENTS COMING : Iviewit Breaking News: NY Supreme Court Ethics Oversight Bosses Alleged MISUSE of Joint Terrorism Task Force Resources & Funds & Violations of Patriot Acts Against Civilian Targets for Personal Gain… US Senator John Sampson Threatened & Bribed to Cover Up NY & Federal Corruption!!

http://www.free-press-release.com/news-iviewit-breaking-indictments-coming-us-senator-john-sampson-threatened-bribed-to-cover-up-ny-federal-corruption-1369140092.html

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Wednesday, May 15, 2013
Expose Corrupt Courts

Insider Says NY State Officials Briefed on Judicial Corruption Indictments

BREAKING NEWS:  A New York State Court administrative insider says that top state officials have been briefed by the feds on pending federal corruption indictments that will include New York state court employees....

And late this morning, a Washington, D.C. source confirmed the information, adding that the target of one federal corruption indictment will include at least one sitting New York State judge and other  individuals- all with ties to major banks.......

http://exposecorruptcourts.blogspot.com/2013/05/insider-says-ny-state-officials-briefed.html

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

UPDATE: SENATOR JOHN SAMPSON, FORMER NEW YORK SENATE JUDICIARY CHAIR THREATENED AND BRIBED TO COVER UP OFFICIAL CORRUPTION

 FRIDAY, MAY 17, 2013

 Washington, D.C. Insider Says Senator John Sampson Covered-Up Court Corruption

BREAKING NEWS: Washington, D.C. insider says NYS Senator John Sampson covered-up evidence of widespread corruption in New York Surrogate's Courts. 

Source says Sampson was first threatened, but then successfully bribed, to bury evidence involving countless state and federal crimes involving billions of dollars.

Syracuse, Rochester, Albany, White Plains, Brooklyn and Manhattan Surrogate's Courts are said to top the list of areas involved.

It was revealed on Wednesday that a New York State Court administrative insider said that top state officials had been briefed by the feds on pending federal corruption indictments that would include employees of New York's Office of Court Administration (a/ka/ "OCA"). Most court employees, including judges, are employed by OCA. 

It was further confirmed by the Washington, D.C. source that judges, with ties to banks, would be among those charged.

http://ethicsgate.blogspot.com/2013/05/washington-dc-insider-says-senator-john.html

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Iviewit Breaking News: NY Supreme Court Ethics Oversight Bosses Alleged MISUSE of Joint Terrorism Task Force Resources & Funds & Violations of Patriot Acts Against Civilian Targets for Personal Gain..

May 14,2013

See Full Story at:

 http://www.free-press-release.com/news-iviewit-breaking-news-ny-supreme-court-ethics-oversight-bosses-alleged-misuse-of-joint-terrorism-task-force-resources-funds-violations-of-patriot-1368533731.html

and

http://ethicsgate.blogspot.com/2013/04/formal-complaint-filed-against-nys.html

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

FORMAL COMPLAINT FILED AGAINST NYS EMPLOYEES FOR ILLEGAL WIRETAPPING...THE WIDESPREAD ILLEGAL WIRETAPPING INCLUDED TARGETED NEW YORK STATE JUDGES AND ATTORNEYS.....

http://ethicsgate.blogspot.com/2013/04/formal-complaint-filed-against-nys.html

SELECT QUOTES FROM THAT NEWS STORY

April 3, 2013

 

Robert Moossy, Jr., Section Chief
Criminal Section, Civil Rights Division
US Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, D.C. 20530

RE: FORMAL COMPLAINT AGAINST NEW YORK STATE EMPLOYEES INVOLVING CONSTITUTIONAL VIOLATIONS, INCLUDING WIDESPREAD ILLEGAL WIRETAPPING

Dear Mr. Moossy,

At some point in time shortly after 9/11, and by methods not addressed here, these individuals improperly utilized access to, and devices of, the lawful operations of the Joint Terrorism Task Force (the JTTF). These individuals completely violated the provisions of FISA, ECPA and the Patriot Act for their own personal and political agendas. Specifically, these NY state employees essentially commenced black bag operations, including illegal wiretapping, against whomever they chose- and without legitimate or lawful purpose.

This complaint concerns the illegal use and abuse of such lawful operations for personal and political gain, and all such activity while acting under the color of law. This un-checked access to highly-skilled operatives found undeserving protection for some connected wrong-doers, and the complete destruction of others- on a whim, including the pre-prosecution priming of falsehoods (set-ups). The aftermath of such abuse for such an extended period of time is staggering.

It is believed that most of the 1.5 million-plus items in evidence now under seal in Federal District Court for the Eastern District of New York, case #09cr405 (EDNY) supports the fact, over a ten-year-plus period of time, of the illegal wiretapping of New York State judges, attorneys, and related targets, as directed by state employees.

One sworn affidavit, by an attorney, confirms the various illegal activity of Manhattan's attorney ethics committee, the Departmental Disciplinary Committee (the DDC), which includes allowing cover law firm operations to engage in the practice of law without a law license. Specifically, evidence (attorney affidavits, etc.) supports the claim that Naomi Goldstein, and other DDC employees supervised the protection of the unlicensed practice of law. The evidence also shows that Ms. Goldstein knowingly permitted the unlicensed practice of law, over a five-year-plus period of time, for the purpose of gaining access to, and information from, hundreds of litigants.

Evidence also supports the widespread illegal use of black bag operations by the NYS employees for a wide-range of objectives: to target or protect a certain judge or attorney, to set-up anyone who had been deemed to be a target, or to simply achieve a certain goal. The illegal activity is believed to not only have involved attorneys and judges throughout all of the New York State, including all 4 court-designated ethics departments, but also in matters beyond the borders of New York.

The set-up of numerous individuals for an alleged plot to bomb a Riverdale, NY Synagogue. These individuals are currently incarcerated. The trial judge, U.S. District Court Judge Colleen McMahon, who publicly expressed concerns over the case, saying, I have never heard anything like the facts of this case. I don't think any other judge has ever heard anything like the facts of this case. (2nd Circuit 11cr2763).

The concerted effort to fix numerous cases where confirmed associates of organized crime had made physical threats upon litigants and/or witnesses, and/or had financial interests in the outcome of certain court cases.

The judicial and attorney protection/operations, to gain control, of the $250 million-plus Thomas Carvel estate matters, and the pre-prosecution priming of the $150 million-plus Brooke Astor estate.

The wire-tapping and ISP capture, etc., of DDC attorney, Christine C. Anderson, who had filed a lawsuit after being assaulted by a supervisor, Sherry Cohen, and after complaining that certain evidence in ethics case files had been improperly destroyed. (See SDNY case #07cv9599 - Hon. Shira A. Scheindlin, U.S.D.J.)

The eToys litigation and bankruptcy, and associates of Marc Dreir, involving over $500 million and the protection by the DDC of certain attorneys, one who was found to have lied to a federal judge over 15 times.

The set-up and chilling of effective legal counsel of a disabled woman by a powerful CEO and his law firms, resulting in her having no contact with her children for over 6 years.

The wrongful detention for 4 years, prompted by influential NY law firms, of an early whistleblower of the massive Wall Street financial irregularities involving Bear Sterns and where protected attorney-client conversations were recorded and distributed.

The blocking of attorney accountability in the $1.25 billion Swiss Bank Holocaust Survivor settlement where one involved NY admitted attorney was ultimately disbarred- in New Jersey. Only then, and after 10 years, did the DDC follow with disbarment. Gizella Weisshaus v. Fagan.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

NY Supreme Court Bosses Illegally Wiretapping Judges Chambers & Homes. Christine Anderson Whistleblower illegally targeted for 24/7/365 surveillance in related case to Iviewit Eliot Bernstein RICO...

 

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE 

(Free-Press-Release.com) May 14, 2013 -- According to news reports, yes, the heads of the NY Supreme Court Ethics Department have been accused of derailing Justice by targeting victims and misusing Government Resources against private citizens with no other motive then Obstruction of Justice in court and regulatory actions against them or their cronies.

World Renowned Inventor Eliot Bernstein files NEW RICO RELATED CRIMINAL ALLEGATIONS against Law Firms Proskauer Rose, Foley & Lardner, Greenberg Traurig and more. Allegations that Bernstein was a target of these criminals cloaked as ATTORNEY AT LAW ETHICS BOSSES at the NY Supreme Court were presented to Federal Judge Shira A. Scheindlin. That evidence was presented that Bernstein's father may have been a target and murdered for his efforts to notify the authorities and more!!!

READ ALL ABOUT IT @

http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20130512%20FINAL%20Motion%20to%20Rehear%20and%20Reopen%20Obstruction%20of%20Justice165555%20WITH%20EXHIBITS.pdf

PREVIOUS PRESS RELEASES RELATING TO JUDGES ILLEGALLY WIRETAPPED

That on Tuesday, February 19, 2013, ECC released the story,

ETHICSGATE UPDATE FAXED TO EVERY U.S. SENATOR THE ULTIMATE VIOLATION OF TRUST IS THE CORRUPTION OF ETHICS OVERSIGHT EXCLUSIVE UPDATE:

http://exposecorruptcourts.blogspot.com/2013/02/ethicsgate-update-faxed-to-every-us.html

---

IVIEWIT LETTER TO US DOJ OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL MICHAEL E. HOROWITZ

http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20130520%20FINAL%20Michael%20Horowitz%20Inspector%20General%20Department%20of%20Justice%20SIGNED%20PRINTED%20EMAIL.pdf

IVIEWIT RICO MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION:

http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20130513%20FINAL%20Motion%20for%20Clarification%20of%20Order174604%20WITH%20NO%20EXHIBITS.pdf

Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox Sues Forbes and the New York Times for Defamation. March 6, 2013

http://www.free-press-release.com/news-investigative-blogger-crystal-cox-sues-forbes-and-the-new-york-times-for-defamation-1362547010.html

COURT CASES OF INTEREST

COX VS. RANDAZZA, ET AL. “ NEVADA RICO CASE NO. 2:13-CV-00297-JCM-VCF CHANGED TO 2:13-CV-00297 JCM (NJK) CHANGED TO 2:13-CV-00297 MMD-VCF

OBSIDIAN FINANCE GROUP, LLC ET AL. V. COX CASE NO. 3:11-CV-00057-HZ (Famed First Amendment Rights Attorney at Law and Professor, Eugene Volokh, Esq., Professor at UCLA School of Law is representing Cox on Appeal)

---

The Beginning of the End ~ New York Senate Judiciary Committee Hearings

September 24, 2009 - Second Hearing

Public Hearing: Standing Committee On The Judiciary New York Senate Judiciary Committee John L. Sampson Chairman

SENATE STANDING COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING

SUBJECT:     The Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee, the grievance committees of the various Judicial Districts and the New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct

PURPOSE:    This hearing will review the mission, procedures and level of public satisfaction with the Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee, the grievance committees of the various Judicial Districts as well as the New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct

ORAL TESTIMONY BY:

Witness List for Judiciary Hearing 9/24/09 The Judicial & Attorney Disciplinary Process in the State of New York

  1. Richard Kuse of New City, NY
  2. Victor Kovner of the Fund for Modem Courts
  3. Douglas Higbee of Mamaroneck, NY
  4. Judith Herskowitz of Miami Beach, FL
  5. Peter Gonzalez of Troy, NY
  6. Andrea Wilkinson of Rensselaer, NY
  7. Maria Gkanios of Mahopac, NY
  8. Dominic Lieto of Mahopac, NY
  9. Regina Felton Esq of Brooklyn, NY
  10. Kathryn Malarkey of Purchase, NY
  11. Nora Renzuli, Esq. of Staten Island, NY
  12. Stephanie Klein of Long Beach, NY
  13. Ike Aruti of Rosedale, NY
  14. Terrence Finnan of Keene, NY
  15. Gizella Weisshaus, NY
  16. Eliot I. Bernstein of Boca Raton, FL
  17. Suzanne McCormick & Patrick Handley of NY

The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court is the entity that is legally responsible for enforcing the Rules of Professional Conduct governing the conduct of attorneys in New York State. The Appellate Division Departments have created grievance committees that are charged with the investigation of complaints against attorneys. Within the First Judicial Department the Departmental Disciplinary Committee of the Appellate Division investigates complaints against attorneys. The New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct was created by the State Constitution and is charged with investigating complaints against Judges and Justices of the Unified Court System.

According to the 2009 Report of the Commission on Judicial Conduct, there were 1,923 complaints filed in 2008. Yet of these complaints only 262 were investigated and of those, 173 were dismissed. This hearing will examine the processes and procedures that are followed by the various agencies charged with the responsibility of enforcing the rules and regulations that must be followed by the Judiciary and the Bar in the State of New York. It will also evaluate public satisfaction with the disciplinary process.

ELIOT BERNSTEIN NEW YORK SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE HEARING TESTIMONY PART 1 of 2

 

ELIOT BERNSTEIN NEW YORK SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE HEARING TESTIMONY PART 2 of 2

 

 

Eliot Bernstein Testimony at NY Judiciary Committee Hearing ~ Real Player Clip - Download

 

Christine C. Anderson Testimony at NY Judiciary Committee ~ Real Player Clip - Download

Testimony of Eliot Bernstein @ 4.02.08 in this resurfaced video of the entire NY Senate Judiciary Committee Hearings, also @

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=knQLll5hmjs&feature=player_embedded

Hand Held Video of Eliot only Testimony Backup

The Lawsuit All Starts with A Whistleblower Complaint and Iviewit is Marked Legally Related to that Case by Federal Judge Shira Scheindlin.  In the following video of a June 08, 2009 Judiciary Committee Hearing in New York, Christine C. Anderson (my hero) gives the real jiggy on the NY State Court Corruptions, she is first to testify after the Department Goons.  In her Original Complaint she mentions Iviewit and the Onion Peels henceforth.

Part 1

Part 2 New York Senate Judiciary Committee Hearings


February 13th 2009 Letter to President Barack Hussein Obama II to enjoin The Honorable Eric H. Holder Jr., United States Attorney General ~ Department of Justice


Eliot Bernstein Speaks Out About Court Corruption in Florida and New York on Les Winston's Talk Radio Show
Disbar the Florida Bar in Miami on 880am, a local Bloomberg Affiliate.

http://disbarthefloridabar.com/?page_id=96

or download and listen

Part 1

Part 2

Part 3


BREAKING NEWS ON INTEL RICO CONSPIRACY AND ANTITRUST INFORMATION

If you own Intel Stock you want to read this carefully and think Recissory Rights

 
Referral of Report of Investigation Case oig501 Disclosure of Nonpublic Information

And this is just mind blowing

 
Proof Of Intel Cartel - RICO Proof -

 

WARNING, p. Stephen Lamont has been terminated from acting on behalf of Iviewit or Eliot Bernstein and has been reported for certain alleged criminal misconduct to THE state of new York and other authorities.  If Lamont offers you shares of stock or any other inducement involving Eliot Bernstein or Iviewit he is committing further fraud

--------

Word from former Iviewit CEO and Shareholder P. Stephen Lamont

A Background of the Iviewit Inventions

By way of introduction, I am P. Stephen Lamont, former Acting CEO of Iviewit (counsel advised all Iviewit executives to resign their posts and work along side Iviewit rather than within Iviewit, as the former Board of Directors, Counsel and Accountants, disbanded without requisite notice to Shareholders in violation of law, thereby leaving massive liability and exposure) and a significant shareholder in Iviewit.  With more than a fifteen year track record as a multimedia technology and consumer electronics licensing executive and holder of a J.D. in Intellectual Property Law from Columbia University, an M.B.A in Finance, and a B.S. in Industrial Engineering, I appallingly write at the cross current, by and between parties described herein, pattern of frauds, deceits, and misrepresentations that run so wide and so deep that it tears at the very fabric of what has become to be know as free commerce in this country, and, in the fact that it pertains to inventors rights, tears at the very fabric of the Constitution of the United States more fully described below.   I write to you with, Eliot I. Bernstein, who was factually present throughout all of these events and so has contributed to assure the veracity of the statements herein and provide credible witness to the events described herein prior to my joining Iviewit.  Mr. Bernstein is the main inventor of the technologies, inventions which he claims to have come from divine origin with a divine purpose.

On or about 1997, Iviewit’s founder, Eliot I. Bernstein and other inventors, came upon inventions pertaining to what industry experts have heretofore described as profound shifts from traditional techniques in video and imaging then overlooked in the annals of digital video and imaging technologies.  Factually, the main video technology is one of capturing a video frame at a, including but not limited to, 320 by 240 frame size (roughly, ¼ of a display device) at a frame rate of one (1) to infinity frames per second (“fps” and at the twenty four (24) to thirty (30) range commonly referred to as “full frame rates” to those skilled in the art). Moreover, once captured, and in its simplest terms, the scaled frames are then digitized (if necessary), filtered, encoded, and delivered to an agnostic display device and then scaled to a full frame size of, including but not limited to, 1280 by 960 at the full frame rates of 24 to 30 fps. The result is, when combined with other proprietary technologies, high quality video at bandwidths of 56 or more Kbps to 6 Mbps per second, at a surprising seventy five percent (75%!) savings in throughput/bandwidth on any digital delivery system such as digital terrestrial, cable, satellite, multipoint-multichannel delivery system, or the Internet, and a similar 75%! savings in storage on mediums such as digital video discs “DVD’s” and the hard drives of many consumer electronic devices.  Also, these savings result in a 75%! decrease in the necessary processing power to encode the video, making old school concepts of parallel processors obsolete and allowing the process of encoding to occur on even a laptop.  Therefore, the video technology opened new markets therefore in both low bandwidth video as is found on cell phones and the Internet to the other end of the spectrum to high end video such as HDDVD, etc. changing even the way television was created, transmitted and viewed, a change from interlacing to the new Iviewit scaling processes, allowing cable companies to increase channel throughput by 75%!   Moreover, on the imaging side, the Iviewit inventions are used on almost every digital camera and present screen design and other devices that utilize the feature of “digital zoom”, whereby the imaging technology provided a way to zoom almost infinitely on a low resolution file with clarity, solving for pixilation that was inherent in the prior art.  Furthermore, industry observers who benefited from the Iviewit disclosures have gone on to claim "you could have put 10,000 engineers in a room for 10,000 years and they would never have come up with these ideas…”  These engineers similarly claimed, to a broad audience, that the technologies were "priceless", the "Holy Grail" of the digital imaging and video world.

Still further, it should be clear, as it relates to the inventions, that we are not talking about some rudimentary software that will be rendered obsolete as newer versions emerge, but that the Iviewit video scaling and image overlay systems are THE backbone, enabling technologies for the transmission of video and images across all transmission networks and viewable on all display devices, where the inventors went back to square one to create a wholly novel elegant upstream solution (towards the content creator) of reconfiguring video and image frames to unlock former bandwidth constraints, led to new processing and storage capabilities and took the video and imaging worlds to a  new dimension.

Moreover, if these inventions become the subject of say a court ordered injunction while investigations are ongoing, it would preclude the use of the technologies while the courts resolve these matters, similar to the recent case almost brought in the RIM/Blackberry matter.  Although dwarfed in comparison, that injunction would have shut Blackberry down to users had the parties not settled the matters, by way of tremendous pressure from the Court, the courts being on of the biggest users of the technology.  The results of an injunction of the Iviewit technologies would be catastrophic to the country in that the product recall alone would be devastating to commerce, shutting down video across the Internet, recalling low bandwidth cell phones, recalling digital camera’s with digital zoom, halting the transmission of 75% of cable channels, recalling medical devices that use scaled zoom, recalling technologies on the Hubble Space Telescope and other government uses, such as flight and space simulators, advanced weapons systems, etc.  These matters are of tantamount importance to federal and international commerce in countless ways, making the job of resolving the crimes against Iviewit a matter of national security concern unprecedented in the history of invention and law.

Furthermore, initially, and early in my tenure, rumors began swirling around the company with finger pointing and all from Florida to Los Angeles wherein it caught the jet stream and arrived very soon in New York of alleged breaches of confidentiality pertaining to Iviewit technology, transfers of trade secrets, and, even in certain circumstances, the knowing and willful invention fraud by the outright switching of signature pages of patent filings by early patent counsels.  Additionally, during my tenure, I was in possession of an executed patent application pertaining to Iviewit’s core imaging technology with the inventors of Bernstein and Shirajee, when, out of thin air, and just prior to filing, with no notice or authorization, such patent application witnesses the addition of a one Brian G. Utley as an inventor, and an individual who could not have been farther from the heat of the inventive stage of the imaging technology.

Still further, I submit that at the first disclosures of the inventions, patent counsel, including Kenneth Rubenstein (also sole patent evaluator and legal counsel to MPEG LA), who had spent half a lifetime attempting and failing to procure technologies for the transmission of full screen, full frame rate video across a variety of transmission networks, and who during the Iviewit disclosures had been known to state “[I] missed that,” and “[I] never thought of that,” and “[This] changes everything,” or words to those effects, Rubenstein was perhaps so fearful that Iviewit would partner with other proprietary technologies across the video value chain that it could wipe his carefully crafted patent pools off the face of the map, therefore, the Iviewit inventions HAD to be converted to MPEGLA, LLC to preserve those pools and convert his client Iviewit's technologies to his pools, of course blocking Iviewit at the same time from market using typical anti-trust tactics commonly associated with patent pools of the past and the reason the Justice Department has typically broken such pools up, as they are anti-competitive, monopolistic in nature. 

That was the first step, with the second step, through the direct and indirect introductions of Iviewit, with executed confidentiality agreements (“NDA’s”), to some five hundred potential licensees by colleagues of counsel, being the proliferation of Iviewit disclosures across a wide array of potential licensees and competitors.  In addition to tying and bundling the technologies into his patent pool licensing scheme, again in violation of most of the anti-trust laws.

Following along, we arrive at the point in the past when Iviewit had thought the Iviewit inventions had been filed at the United States Patent & Trademark Office and the United States Copyright Office and that everyone had begun to use it, when past management in Iviewit and patent counsel were found writing patents in patent counsels name and other non-inventor management names,  in addition to the intentional unauthorized changes of inventors, owners and assignees. Later, as Arthur Andersen conducted an audit on behalf of investor Crossbow Ventures whose funds were 2/3 Small Business Administration loans, evidence emerged of a corporate shell game involving multiple, unauthorized, similarly named corporate formations, unauthorized stock swaps and unauthorized asset transfers that resulted in the core patent applications assigned to entities that may have only one shareholder, perhaps the limited liability partnership of Proskauer Rose or other unauthorized holders, including the alleged perpetrating patent counsel, perhaps, with a view towards resurrecting the backbone technologies at some future point only converted illegally as their own.

Moreover, in a September 2006 letter to Representative Nita Lowey (D-NY 18th) I wrote that in the above series of allegations, Iviewit is confident that your Office will find a reasonable certainty that Messrs. Kenneth Rubenstein, Esq. of Proskauer, Raymond A. Joao, Esq. of Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolfe and Schlissel and William J. Dick, Esq., Steven Becker, Esq., and Douglas Boehm, Esq. of Foley and Lardner, all Iviewit Patent Counsel and present or former members of the distinguished Bar of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, designed and executed, either for themselves or others similarly situated, the deceptions, improprieties, and, even in certain circumstances, outright misappropriation by the disingenuous redirection of the disclosed Iviewit techniques by: (i) burying the critical elements of the inventions in patent applications filed on behalf of the true Iviewit Shareholders & Inventors; (ii) allowing the unauthorized use of Iviewit’s inventions under NDA’s without enforcement of said NDA’s; (III) filing patent applications of their own or others based on the Iviewit inventions into false inventors names and illegally set up corporations; (IV) submitting knowingly false statements and falsified documents done with intent to commit fraud on the USPTO (a federal offense), Iviewit’s shareholders, and the Iviewit Inventors.  [It should be noted here that these attorneys and others are now under formal investigation by patent offices worldwide that have been ongoing for several years].  

Furthermore, in that same Rep. Lowey letter, that as a result of the series of allegations enclosed, and although it is clear to Iviewit that the role of Congress is to make law not to enforce law, Iviewit finds it reasonable that your Office: (i) shall find the requisite merit to initiate Congressional investigations; (ii) shall pass these allegations to a Congressional staff attorney in the House Committee on Energy and Commerce, or other appropriate committee, for further investigation; (iii) shall instruct said staff attorney to institute a formal Congressional investigation, including questioning, requests for records, and other information from all parties involved; (iv) shall refer said attorney’s findings back to you as a Representative in the Congress of the United States; (v) shall present such findings to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce, or other appropriate committee, for determinative review; and finally (vi) shall witness said Congressional committee to urge disciplinary action against the alleged offending attorneys by the U.S. Attorney’s Office or other organization, agency, or court of appropriate jurisdiction.

Lastly, Iviewit often asks itself, among other things,  “Why did the Hon. Jorge LaBarga of the Circuit Court of the Fifteenth Judicial District, Florida deny Iviewit’s Motion for Leave to Amend Answer to Assert Counterclaim for Damages (concerning the aforementioned allegations)” and “Why did the Supreme Court of Florida - The Florida Bar (‘TFB’) dismiss the complaint against Christopher C. Wheeler, Esq. (‘Wheeler’ and, a non-patent attorney, a main protagonist of the above referenced allegations) despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary” and “Why did the Supreme Court of Florida deny Iviewit’s Petition to begin the immediate investigation of the Wheeler complaint (when TFB admitted in writing that the answer to the Wheeler complaint  was authored by an attorney, Matthew Triggs of Proskauer Rose, in flagrant violation of his public office obligations)” and “Why did the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department - Departmental Disciplinary Committee stall Iviewit’s complaint against Rubenstein and Joao despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary” and “Why, despite the New York State Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department’s Court Order (unanimously voted on by five Justices) to begin the immediate investigation of Rubenstein, Steven C. Krane (former NYSBA President & Proskauer partner who handled complaints against Joao and Rubenstein while maintaining undisclosed roles at the First Department) and Joao, for conflicts and violations of New York Supreme Court public offices, did the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division Second Department - Departmental Disciplinary Committee charged with conducting an immediate investigation dismiss on review the Rubenstein and Joao complaints and stating that they were ‘not under the jurisdiction’ of the First Department Court” [thus no witnesses were contacted, no evidence was tested and the attorneys did not even have to respond formally or informally to the charges against them] and "When conflicts were discovered at the Second Department with Krane why were complaints refused by the Second Department to be formally docketed against their members caught in conflict, those members denying complaints against themselves???" and  “Why did the Virginia Bar Association dismiss the Dick complaint despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary and the fact that the United States Patent Office had suspended the Iviewit patents based on a Foley and Lardner intellectual property docket submitted to the VBA that had factually false and misleading information regarding patent inventors, owners and assignees” and “Why did the Supreme Court of the United States decline to hear Iviewit’s Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Florida Supreme Court to overturn the Florida Court’s decision, which acted to block Iviewit from filing complaints against Florida Supreme Court officers caught in conflicts of interest and violations of public offices” and “why did John Doll & Jon Dudas, Commissioners' of Patents at the USPTO, fail to correct the inventors, and refuse to take or return Iviewit’s call or respond to formal office filings, including a petition filed more than three years ago by Iviewit and its lead investor Crossbow Ventures/SBA, which led to the suspending of patent applications pending ongoing investigations” and Iviewit finds itself answering “THAT IT IS ALL PART AND PARCEL OF THE TOTAL DENIAL OF DUE PROCESS IN THE PATTERN OF FRAUDS, DECEITS, AND MISREPRESENTATIONS THAT RUN SO WIDE AND SO DEEP THAT IT TEARS AT THE VERY FABRIC OF WHAT HAS BECOME TO BE KNOW AS FREE COMMERCE IN THIS COUNTRY, AND, IN THE FACT THAT IT PERTAINS TO INVENTORS RIGHTS, TEARS AT THE VERY FABRIC OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES.”

Lastly, take to heart this following series of events that, from Tokyo to Munich and all places in between, has been commonly described as THE GREATEST PATENT STORY EVER TOLD while at the same time becoming one of the most bungled crimes in history, perhaps the largest crime ever perpetrated in the history of crime itself; crimes constituting further a treasonous series of actions to rob the United States Commerce Department, the country's greatest jewel, the United States Patent & Trademark Offices, usurping Free Commerce as we know it in America in the process!  The cover-up, well to say the least, constitutes violation after violation of sworn oaths by government officials entrusted to uphold justice, elevating  perhaps throughout the Legislative, the Executive and the Judicial branches, creating a government of criminal activity, a "Culture of Corruption"  (paralleling the reality you now live in) all to deny due process and procedure, evade prosecution of the complaints filed against them and stave off the inevitable federal prison time for their actions, as further described herein.


WARNING!!!

READING THE CONTENTS OF THIS SITE MAY MAKE YOU PATENT YOUR INVENTIONS IN FOREIGN NATIONS V. THE UNITED STATES


PART I - THE HOLY GRAIL INVENTIONS

The Company continues to pursue an aggressive intellectual property strategy. I-View-It has protected its enabling Intellectual Properties by filing US Patent Pending Applications, Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) International Applications, US Provisional Patent Pending Applications, Japanese Applications, Copyrights, Trademarks, Trade Secrets (we thinks, we are still trying to determine what was filed and what has been stolen, investigations ongoing). Below is summary of the key processes of the pending Intellectual Property Pool.  Iviewit is a recognized innovator in the digital capture, encoding and distribution of video and images with patents pending, or in this case, patents suspending and is currently focusing on three of its core IP assets:

Mathematical Scaling Formula For Encoding & Playback of Video

The Patent Pending process that utilizes scaled down video encodes that when transmitted to an end user produce full-screen video representations at an amazing 75% lower bandwidth than prior technologies. This process enables the delivery of distortion-free rich media at full-screen, full frame resolution with normal TV-equivalent frame rates at extremely low bandwidths, ideal for mediums such as the Internet, previously thought impossible. At high bandwidths, the process provides superior processing efficiencies and creates 75% smaller file sizes for digital distribution (i.e. DVD's, HDDVD, VCD's, SVCD's, etc.), an enormous savings over prior compression technologies.  The scaled processes have effected all forms of hardware and software along the video value chain and have paved the way for low bandwidth video cell phones and allowed large scale Internet video.  On the high of the bandwidth spectrum the technologies have transformed gaming from pong like graphics to the lifelike ones as common now in the Play Station, X-BOX, etc. The technologies having already had a profound effect on many scientific, medical and military processes affecting society in the endless uses of digital imaging and video technologies.

Mathematical Scaling Formula For Encoding & Viewing Images with Super Smooth Zoom & Pan Capabilities

Creates high definition, user controlled "super" zoom and pan capability levels without macro blocking and pixilation. The image scaling process is likely applicable to every known screen used in imaging, making the list of potential applications - and revenue streams - literally endless.  From space telescopes, to digital camera's, to X-ray's, to MRI's, to space simulators, to satellite imaging tech's like Google Maps, etc. this set of technologies has taken the pixilation out of images when zooming

Combined Iviewit video and imaging processes to create a user interface allowing camera control and zoomable video streams.

Duh - Combined I View It imaging and video processes to create a user controlled video or television environment with super zoom and pan applications.


Ellen DeGeneres Speaks Out on Iviewit Technology - "Use Iviewit for the Sake of the Country"
Bet Ellen had no idea at the time how profound her statement would be and how much of the country is really at stake over it.

Ellen DeGeneres Speaks Out on Iviewit Technology - "Use Iviewit for the Sake of the Country"


COME JOIN IVIEWIT IN THE GREATEST PATENT STORY EVER TOLD & PROTECT OUR COUNTRY FROM THE TERRORISTS WITHIN.

Note to Inventors and Artists:

The United States Patent Office has changed from "First to Invent" to "First to File" and with that change the greatest country of innovation in the world has digressed backwards and now your attorneys can take your inventions as their own by filing it for themselves before you.

 

WARNING!

This site uses technologies that may or may not be protected by the United States Patent & Trademark Office & European Patent Office

HAS CORRUPTION REACHED OUR MOST ESTEEMED COMMERCE DEPARTMENT?  WHAT HAVE THEY DONE TO PROTECT THE INVENTIONS AND INVENTORS? 

Patents suspended indefinitely, investigations lingering for five years and a Patent Office that refuses to respond to official filings?


United States Patent & Trademark Office Filings

PATENT SUSPENSION NOTICE 1

-------------------------------------------

PATENT SUSPENSION NOTICE 2

-------------------------------------------

List of Patents Pending & Patents Suspending:
 

United States Patents

Foreign Patents

Trademarks
09/630,939

System & Method for Providing an Enhanced Digital Image File
SUSPENDED BY COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS
February 17, 2004

PCT/US00/21211
System & Method for Providing an Enhanced
Digital Image File
 
 
WIPO LINK

75/725,802

THE CLICK HEARD 'ROUND THE WORLD June 8, 1999 FILED July 27, 2004

09/630,939

System & Method for Providing an Enhanced Digital Image File
SUSPENDED BY COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS
February 17, 2004

PCT/US00/15602
System & Method for Video Playback Over a
Network
WIPO LINK

75/725,805

IVIEWIT "YOUR THIRD EYE TO THE WORLD" June 8, 1999 FILED July 27, 2004

09/630,939

System & Method for Providing an Enhanced Digital Image File
SUSPENDED BY COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS
February 17, 2004

75/725,806

IVIEWIT "YOUR THIRD EYE TO THE WORLD" June 8, 1999 FILED July 27, 2004

09/522,721

Apparatus & Method for Producing Enhanced Digital Images
PENDING SUSPENSION FILED
February 26, 2004

PCT US00/15408
System & Method for Streaming an Enhanced
Digital Video File
WIPO LINK (Where did this go???)
75/725,807

IVIEWIT 'YOUR THIRD EYE TO THE WORLD" (THIS MARK IS MISSING PROPER QUOTES June 8, 1999 FILED July 27, 2004

09/587,734

System & Method for Providing an Enhanced Digital Video File
SUSPENDED BY COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS
February 26, 2004

PCT/US00/15405
System & Method for Providing an Enhanced
Digital Video File
WIPO LINK(Where did this go???)

75/725,808

IVIEWIT "YOUR THIRD EYE TO THE WORLD June 8, 1999 FILED July 27, 2004

09/587,734

System & Method for Providing an Enhanced Digital Video File
SUSPENDED BY COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS
February 26, 2004

PCT US00/07772
Apparatus & Method for Producing Enhanced
Digital Images
WIPO LINK (Where did this go???)

 

75/725,809

IVIEWIT "YOUR THIRD EYE TO THE WORLD June 8, 1999 FILED July 27, 2004

09/587,026

System & Method for Playing a Digital Video File
SUSPENDED BY COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS
February 26, 2004

EPO 00938126.0
System & Method for Streaming an Enhanced
Digital Video File

75/725,810

IVIEWIT "YOUR THIRD EYE TO THE WORLD June 8, 1999 FILED July 27, 2004

09/587,730

System & Method for Streaming an Enhanced Digital Video File
SUSPENDED BY COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS
February 26, 2004

EPO 00944619.6

System & Method for Streaming an Enhanced
Digital Video File

75/725,816

IVIEWIT.COM June 8, 1999 FILED July 27, 2004

60/223,344

Zoom & Pan Using a Digital Camera

EPO 00955352.0

System & Method for Providing an Enhanced
Digital Image File

75/725,816

IVIEWIT June 8, 1999 FILED July 27, 2004

60/233,341

Zoom & Pan Imaging Design Tool

Japan 2001 502364
System & Method for Streaming an Enhanced
Digital Video File

75/725,817

IVIEWIT.COM June 8, 1999 FILED July 27, 2004

60,169,559

Apparatus and Method for Producing Enhanced Video Images and/or Video Files

Japan 2001 502362
System & Method for Streaming an Enhanced
Digital Video File

75/725,817

IVIEWIT June 8, 1999 FILED July 27, 2004

60/155,404

Apparatus & Method for Producing Enhanced Video Images and/or Video Files

Japan 2001 514379

System & Method for Providing an Enhanced
Digital Image File

75/725,818

IVIEWIT.COM June 8, 1999 FILED July 27, 2004

60/149,737

Apparatus and Method for Producing Enhanced Digital Images and/or Digital Video Files

Korea PCT US00 15408

75/725,819

THE CLICK HEARD 'ROUND THE WORLD June 8, 1999 FILED July 27, 2004

60/146,726

Apparatus & Method for Producing Enhanced Digital Images

 

75/725,819

IVIEWIT.COM June 8, 1999 FILED July 27, 2004

60/141,440

Apparatus & Method for Providing and/or transmitting Video Data and/or Information in a Communication Network

 

75/725,820

IVIEWIT.COM June 8, 1999 FILED July 27, 2004

60/137,921

Apparatus & Method for Playing Video Files Across the Internet

 

75/725,821

IVIEWIT June 8, 1999 FILED July 27, 2004

60/137,297

Apparatus & Method for Producing Enhanced Video Images

 

75/725,821

THE CLICK HEARD 'ROUND THE WORLD June 8, 1999 FILED July 27, 2004

60/125,824

Apparatus & Method for Producing Enhanced Digital Images

 

75/725,822

IVIEWIT June 8, 1999 FILED July 27, 2004

   

75/725,823

IVIEWIT June 8, 1999 FILED July 27, 2004

   

75/725,823

THE CLICK HEARD 'ROUND THE WORLD June 8, 1999 FILED July 27, 2004

   

76/037,700

IVIEWIT.COM May 1, 2000 FILED July 27, 2004

   

76/037,701

A SITE FOR SORE EYES May 1, 2000 FILED July 27, 2004

   

76/037,702

A SITE FOR SORE EYES May 1, 2000 FILED July 27, 2004

   

76/037,703

IVIEWIT May 1, 2000 FILED July 27, 2004

   

76/037,843

IVIEWIT LOGO May 1, 2000 FILED July 27, 2004

   

76/037,844

May 1, 2000 FILED July 27, 2004

     
     
     

PART II - THE CRIMES AND CRIMINALS IN THE ATTEMPT TO STEAL THE IVIEWIT INVENTIONS


"The greatest want of the world is the want of men, --men who will not be bought or sold; men who in their inmost souls are true and honest, men who do not fear to call sin by its right name; men whose conscience is as true to duty as the needle to the pole, men who will stand for the right though the heavens fall. -Education, p. 57(1903)"
ELLEN G. WHITE

 


Complaint filed with the DOJ - OIG after the FBI lost the Iviewit case file and the Car Bombing files.  Iviewit was told the agent handling the matters had retired early with the case files! 

2007 04 20 Letter to the Department of Justice ~ Office of Inspector General, Inspector General Glenn Fine, regarding missing Federal Bureau of Investigation files and missing United States Attorney Files regarding the Iviewit Matters


This complaint was filed after the US Attorney Office's claimed they had no case file for the case the FBI had prior presented to them.

2007 06 14 Letter to the Department of Justice ~ Office of Professional Responsibility, H. Marshall Jarrett, at the request of the DOJ-OIG, regarding missing Iviewit case files at the FBI & US Attorney offices


Letter from the DOJ - OPR stating they have begun review of the matters. At this level of Justice, if the Justice Department tries to wiggle from the obligation to investigate and prosecute, it would take Alberto Gonzales or whomever replaces him to evade all due process and procedure in these matters and that order could only come from his remaining supporter, the President, the Decider and those who pull puppet strings.  With Gonzales as credible as a perjurer, liar and possibly a war criminal, one would assume that these are the reasons the Bush Regime can not let him go.  At that point, the country will become embroiled in Patentgate sooner or later, as it would take 20 years of the patent life and beyond to avoid the matters without due process, a non-reality. 

2007 07 16 Letter from the Department of Justice ~ Office of Professional Responsibility regarding beginning review of the Iviewit matters


December 15, 2007 Iviewit Federal Complaint Filed in the United States District Court - New York Southern District -- Filed in response to Whistleblower case revealing New York Supreme Court Officers Covered-Up Ethic Cases like Iviewit, as reported in NY Times and NY Law Journal below.

Filed Complaint @

 http://www.iviewit.tv/20071215usdcsnycomplaint.pdf

United States District Court - New York Sothern District
Case No. 07 CV 11196

The MAYBE NOT SO Honorable Judge Shira A. Scheindlin or the MOST HONORABLE JUDGE ON HER WAY TO THE SUPREME COURT

NEW YORK POST ~ August 17, 2006

'JUNIOR' SINGS SOPRANO August 17, 2006 -- John "Junior" Gotti finally sang - but it was "Happy Birthday" to a federal judge. Gotti helped Manhattan federal Judge Shira Scheindlin celebrate her 60th birthday by serenading her from his seat at the defense table yesterday. "I led the attack," Gotti said outside of court. "Everyone was saying, 'We're going to sing, we're going to sing,' and then they started chickening out." The bizarre and unusual birthday celebration was carried out in the courtroom - which was mysteriously closed to the public - before jury selection in Gotti's racketeering trial resumed for a third day. The mob scion was joined singing, "Happy Birthday Judge Scheindlin," by at least one of his defense lawyers, members of the prosecution team and court personnel. Participation wasn't exactly optional after the judge's courtroom deputy instructed everyone present in the courtroom to participate. Gotti and Scheindlin have been through a lot together over the past year. The former Gambino leader is facing his third trial for racketeering after two previous juries failed to reach a verdict - with all of the trials taking place in Scheindlin's courtroom. Later in the day the judge got some chuckles when she agreed to excuse a potential juror who had plans to travel to Paris to celebrate her mother's 60th birthday. "I'm particularly sympathetic to 60th birthdays," Scheindlin said. Scheindlin's mini-bash, which lacked gifts and cake, was a private affair. When a reporter tried to enter the courtroom as the singing was about to begin, deputies with the U.S. Marshals Service said the judge's deputy had instructed them to bar the public for 10 minutes, but they could not say why. Courtrooms are typically closed to the public only to protect the identity of cooperating witnesses, undercover agents and the victims of sex crimes, or for national-security concerns. Legal experts raised eyebrows at the fact that Scheindlin allowed the impromptu fete to occur at all. "This is not a major violation of judicial ethics. It's a pimple on the trial," said David Luban, law professor and legal ethicist at Georgetown University. "I think she ought to have stopped it. I think any trial judge is perfectly capable of cutting them off if something is not proper. It casts doubt in the judge's own partiality if the judge allows the defendant to sing 'Happy Birthday,' " said Luban. "It's a bizarre situation in the middle of the criminal trial singing 'Happy Birthday.' It's inappropriate," said Christopher Murray, a civil-rights attorney based in Garden City, L.I. Opening statements in the trial could take place as soon as this afternoon.

______________________________________

From Wikipedia

Judge Scheindlin presided over three trials of John Gotti Jr. ("Junior"), each of which ended in a mistrial due to a deadlocked jury.[6] The principle charge against Gotti in the trials was racketeering conspiracy stemming from Gotti's alleged management of the Gambino crime family following the incarceration and death of his father, John Gotti Sr. (the "Dapper Don"). "On September 20, 2005, the jury acquitted him of securities fraud and hung 11-1 for conviction on racketeering charges that included the assault on Sliwa. His re-trial on the remaining charges the following March also ended in a mistrial, with the jury hung 8-4 for acquittal. At the third trial involving the Sliwa assault, prosecutors convinced 12 jurors that Junior had ordered the kidnapping but failed to convince them that he had engaged in criminal activity after 1999 and the jury again deadlocked on the racketeering charges, this time voting 8-4 for conviction."

_______________________________________

IVIEWIT AMENDED COMPLAINT - ONE TRILLION DOLLARS IN DAMAGES

U.S. District Court
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Foley Square)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:07-cv-11196-SAS


Bernstein et al v. Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee et al
Assigned to: Judge Shira A. Scheindlin

Demand: $9,999,000
 
Related Case:  1:07-cv-09599-SAS
Cause: 18:1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act

Date Filed: 12/12/2007
Jury Demand: Plaintiff
Nature of Suit: 470 Racketeer/Corrupt Organization
Jurisdiction: Federal Question
Plaintiff
Eliot I. Bernstein
Individually
represented by Eliot I. Bernstein
PRO SE
 
Plaintiff
Eliot I. Bernstein represented by Eliot I. Bernstein
(See above for address)
PRO SE
 
Plaintiff
P. Stephen Lamont
on behalf of Shareholders of UVIEW.COM, INC. – DL; IVIEWIT HOLDINGS, INC. – DL; IVIEWIT HOLDINGS, INC. – DL; IVIEWIT HOLDINGS, INC. – FL; IVIEWIT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. – DL; IVIEWIT.COM, INC. – FL; IVIEWIT.COM, INC. - DL; I.C., INC. – FL; IVIEWIT.COM LLC – DL; IVIEWIT LLC – DL; IVIEWIT CORPORATION – FL; IVIEWIT, INC. – FL; IVIEWIT, INC. – DEL; IVIEWIT CORPORATION. ANY OTHER JOHN DOE COMPANIES (“JOHN DOE”) NOT KNOWN AT THIS TIME, AS INVESTIGATIONS REMAIN OPEN;  and Patent Interest Holders
represented by Eliot I. Bernstein & P. Stephen Lamont
PRO SE
Plaintiffs

Shareholders of UVIEW.COM, INC. – DL; IVIEWIT HOLDINGS, INC. – DL; IVIEWIT HOLDINGS, INC. – DL; IVIEWIT HOLDINGS, INC. – FL; IVIEWIT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. – DL; IVIEWIT.COM, INC. – FL; IVIEWIT.COM, INC. - DL; I.C., INC. – FL; IVIEWIT.COM LLC – DL; IVIEWIT LLC – DL; IVIEWIT CORPORATION – FL; IVIEWIT, INC. – FL; IVIEWIT, INC. – DEL; IVIEWIT CORPORATION. ANY OTHER JOHN DOE COMPANIES (“JOHN DOE”) NOT KNOWN AT THIS TIME, AS INVESTIGATIONS REMAIN OPEN; and Patent Interest Holders:

Abbagliato, Leslie 
Abbott, Alec B. and Sherry 
Abelardo, Sonny 
Ahmed, Mohammad 
Air Apparent Travel Inc. - Employee Pool
Allison, Barney
Ames, Tom 
Anderson Howard Employee Pool
Anderson, Kenneth 
Arbuthnot, Lesli 
Armstrong Hirsch Jackoway Tyerman & Wertheimer, P.C.
Armstrong, James  
Ashkenazy, Penelope 
Ashkenazy, Severyn 
Bader, Robert and Robin
Baker, Sara Courtney 
Bank, Vincent 
Barrenneck, Lori 
Becker, Barry & Stacy and Children
Benham, Blaze 
Bernstein, Daniel Elijsha Abe Ottomo 
Bernstein, David and Annika  and Children
Bernstein, Eliot I. and Candice  and Children
Bernstein, Irene 
Bernstein, Jacob Noah Archie formerly The Jacob Bernstein 1999 Trust 
Bernstein, Joshua Ennio Zander formerly The Joshua Bernstein 1999 Trust 
Bernstein, Mark 
Bernstein, Simon L. and Shirley  
Bernstein, Stanley & Charlotte 
Bernstein, Stephen 
Bernstein, Theodore and Children
Bieler @ Bieler Bros. Records
Billotti, Beverly & Chip 
Bleemusic Inc.
Blue Fiddle Records
Bouhenguel, Redjem 
Brady, Frank 
Brandon, Jennifer 
Brunelas, Charles 
Burnham, Frank 
Butler, Edward 
C. Allen Produtions
Calkins, John & Rebecca 
Campion, John & Edmund 
Castro, Tony and Children
Chavez, Charles 
Chey, Douglas 
Chirino, Tony 
Clark, Tim 
Cohen, James 
Cohen, Karen & Laurie 
Colter, David 
Cookman, John E. Jr.
Cordero, Amber 
Cowman, Jenna 
Crawford, Megan 
Crush Music Media Management
Daniels, Patricia  
Davis, John & Gregg (on behalf of Marvin & Barbara Davis)
Deleo, Lisa 
DiBedart, George
Dietz, Andrew and Donna and Children
Dittner, Chris & Cori
Diversafest LLC [DFEST]
Doyle, Matt and Michelle 
Dusha, Bill 
Ellis, Stacey 
Engle, Noble
Erika R. Lewin 
Evolution Promotions
Feigenbaum, Robert 
Fischman, Joseph 
Flecktones Tours LLC
Frazier, Sherri  & Children
Freidkin, Monte 
Frenden, Anthony
Friedstein , Jeffrey and Lisa and Children
Fritz, Brian
Fueled By Ramen Inc.
Gaffney, Esq., Mark W. 
Gailet, Aubrie
Galvin, John 
Garber, Edward 
Garlipp, Joe 
Gaspari, Maxemillion 
George, William 
Giordano, Anthony
Gluzband, Melissa 
Gold, Steve 
Goldstein, James & Christine
Gonsalves, Gregory 
Gonsalves, Joel & Robin and Children
Gonsalves, Thaddeus and Judy and Children
Gonzales, Frank & Renee 
Gorge, Sal 
Gorman, Mitchell 
Gregg, Jason 
Grimes, Dale & Carol Groves
Grote, Lorna and Christopher 
Guccione, Robert 
Hagen, Lisa 
Hale, Molly and Todd 
Hanes, Leah 
Happy Feet Living Trust - Ellen DeGeneres
Hard Head Management
Heche Trust - Anne Heche
Hendricks, Lisa 
Hirschtick, Jon K. 
Holfer, Larry 
Horowitz, Marcel & Florence 
Howard, Brett
I Hate Kate
Iantoni, Guy & Jill  
In DeGoot 
Indivision Management
INVESTECH Holdings LLC - H. Wayne Huizenga and H. Wayne Huizenga Jr.
Irell & Manella
Iviewit Charitable Giving Fund (Thought Journal) 
Jackoway, Esq., James  and Jackoway, Esq., Michele Marlene Mulrooney  and Children
Jacobs, Jon 
James, Russell 
JMAX Productions
Jurcak, Courtney
Kane, Donald G.   
Katz, Zach 
Kaye, Timothy 
Kennedy, Lori 
Kershaw, Sarah 
Kiley, Karen & Kevin 
Klein, Beth and Frederick 
Kluge, Jennifer
Krauel, Heidi 
Krokower, Robert 
Lamont, P. Stephen
Lauren Lloyd Living Trust
LCD Soundsystem
Leavitt, Amanda 
Leavitt, Wayne 
Leonsis, Ted 
Lequeux, Blayne 
Less than Jake
Lewin, Gerald R. & Barbara S. 
Lewin, Jennifer P. 
Lewinter, Esq., Anthony 
Liu, Vinnie 
Lockwood, Kevin 
Lypaczewski, Paul 
Lyte, Seamus 
Magnussen, Ryan 
Marino, Susie 
McCrirrick, Flip and Leanne 
McCullough, Lyle 
McDonough Management
McFarland, William 
McGee, Doc
McKittrick, Alan 
Merritt & Sophia Howard Fund
Miah, Hassan 
Milano Music Management 
Miller, Paul 
Milligan, Beverly 
Mink, Matthew 
Mitroo, Sumair 
Moore, Charles Michael 
Morgan, Misty 
Morissette, Alanis 
Morra, Buddy
Moss, Gina 
Nadelman, Ari & Yona 
Nance-Poor, Steve 
Nathanson, Gary
New Media Holdings, Inc.
Newman, Carolyn
Nielsen, Gary 
Niemtschik, Rafeal "Hollywood" 
Nixon, Eric 
Nixon, Sherri 
Noyes, Mark 
Ollivier, Jamie 
Osterling, James  
Palermo, RosE
Pay Up Management / Idolz Maker
Peake, Don 
Perkiss, Corri
Pettus, Gary  & Three Doors Down
Brad Arnold
Matt Roberts
Todd Harrell
Chris Henderson
Greg Upchurch 
Pfeffer, Louis 
Phillips, Matt 
Preston, Daniel 
Raymond, Tammy 
Reale, Michael 
Rebel Waltz
Reynolds, Joe  & Shiny Toy Guns
Gregori Chad Petree
Jeremy Dawson
Mikey Martin
Sisely Treasure
Roach, Kevin 
Roberman, Robert 
Rock-It Cargo, USA Inc. Employee Pool
Roe, Jeff 
Rogers, Esq., Caroline P. and Geoffrey and Children
Rogers, Spencer and Dana
Rosario, Jude 
Rosen, Irving 
Rosman, Esq., Richard 
Rousseaux, Harmony 
Ryan, Joseph 
Sanctuary
Sanford, Thomas 
Scanlan, Jack
Schleicher, Stephen 
Seibert, Michael J. 
Selz, Steven 
Shirajee, Zakirul 
Siefken, Rob 
Silent Owners
Simon, Adam 
Simon, David and Pamela and Children
Simon, John 
Simpson, Crystal and Lucas 
Simpson, Matthew 
Sklar, Steve 
Slaby, William and Michelle 
Smith, Chris 
Smith, Shenell 
Special Team Music
Staley, Kim 
Stanger, Bettie 
Stanger, Dana 
Stanger, Ginger 
Stanger, Jeffrey and Kimberly and Children
Stanger, Lynn & Francis 
Stanger, Paul 
Stark, Joan 
Steven Nevius
Stillman, John 
Stomp, Michael and Nikki 
Stomp, Sherry 
STP Employee Fund
Street, Brian 
Stuart, John 
Supowitz, Lou  
Sutherland, Steven 
Terri, Chris 
Thagard, Gregory B. 
The Pocket Recordings
Tidal 4
Tuvia School
Utke, Karen & Brian 
Valence,  Jane
Veneer, Robert and Kari and Children
Verona, Stephen 
Verzaal, Jessica 
Villam Artists
Wall, Jeremey 
Warren, Bruce 
Washington, Debbie 
Welch, Scott 
Welsch, Mitchell & Isa
Westphal, Stew 
Winters, Dorothy 
World Audience
Young, Alan 
Yuricek, Jeremy 
Zamarin, Mitch 

V.
 
Defendant

STATE OF NEW YORK, THE OFFICE OF COURT ADMINISTRATION OF THE UNIFIED COURT SYSTEM,

PROSKAUER ROSE LLP, and, all of its Partners, Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and individual capacities,

STEVEN C. KRANE in his official and individual Capacities for the New York State Bar Association (former President of the NYSBA) and the Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee (officer of the Court), and, his professional and individual capacities as a Proskauer partner,
KENNETH RUBENSTEIN, in his professional and individual capacities,
ESTATE OF STEPHEN KAYE, in his professional and individual capacities,
ALAN S. JAFFE, in his professional and individual capacities,    
ROBERT J. KAFIN, in his professional and individual capacities,
CHRISTOPHER C. WHEELER, in his professional and individual capacities,
MATTHEW M. TRIGGS in his official and individual capacity for The Florida Bar and his professional and individual capacities as a partner of Proskauer,
ALBERT T. GORTZ, in his professional and individual capacities,
CHRISTOPHER PRUZASKI, in his professional and individual capacities,
MARA LERNER ROBBINS, in her professional and individual capacities,
DONALD “ROCKY” THOMPSON, in his professional and individual capacities,
GAYLE COLEMAN, in her professional and individual capacities,
DAVID GEORGE, in his professional and individual capacities,
GEORGE A. PINCUS, in his professional and individual capacities,
GREGG REED, in his professional and individual capacities,
LEON GOLD, in his professional and individual capacities,
MARCY HAHN-SAPERSTEIN, in her professional and individual capacities,
KEVIN J. HEALY, in his professional and individual capacities,
STUART KAPP, in his professional and individual capacities,
RONALD F. STORETTE, in his professional and individual capacities,
CHRIS WOLF, in his professional and individual capacities,
JILL ZAMMAS, in her professional and individual capacities,
JON A. BAUMGARTEN, in his professional and individual capacities,
SCOTT P. COOPER, in his professional and individual capacities,
BRENDAN J. O'ROURKE, in his professional and individual capacities,
LAWRENCE I. WEINSTEIN, in his professional and individual capacities,
WILLIAM M. HART, in his professional and individual capacities,
DARYN A. GROSSMAN, in his professional and individual capacities,
JOSEPH A. CAPRARO JR., in his professional and individual capacities,
JAMES H. SHALEK, in his professional and individual capacities,
GREGORY MASHBERG, in his professional and individual capacities,
JOANNA SMITH, in her professional and individual capacities,

MELTZER LIPPE GOLDSTEIN  WOLF & SCHLISSEL, P.C.  and its predecessors and successors, and, all of its Partners, Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and individual capacities,

LEWIS S. MELTZER, in his professional and individual capacities,
KENNETH RUBENSTEIN, in his professional and individual capacities,
RAYMOND A. JOAO, in his professional and individual capacities,
FRANK MARTINEZ, in his professional and individual capacities,

FOLEY & LARDNER LLP, and, all of its Partners, Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and individual capacities,

MICHAEL C. GREBE, in his professional and individual capacities,
WILLIAM J. DICK, in his professional and individual capacities,
TODD C. NORBITZ, in his professional and individual capacities,
ANNE SEKEL, in his professional and individual capacities,
RALF BOER, in his professional and individual capacities,
BARRY GROSSMAN, in his professional and individual capacities,
JIM CLARK, in his professional and individual capacities,
DOUGLAS A. BOEHM, in his professional and individual capacities,
STEVEN C. BECKER, in his professional and individual capacities,

FORMER IVIEWIT MANAGEMENT

BRIAN G. UTLEY,
MICHAEL REALE,
RAYMOND HERSCH,
WILLIAM KASSER,
ROSS MILLER, ESQ. in his professional and individual capacities,

STATE OF FLORIDA, OFFICE OF THE STATE COURTS ADMINISTRATOR, FLORIDA,

HON. JORGE LABARGA in his official and individual capacities,

THE FLORIDA BAR,

JOHN ANTHONY BOGGS in his official and individual capacities,
KELLY OVERSTREET JOHNSON (former President) in her official and individual capacities,
LORRAINE CHRISTINE HOFFMAN in her official and individual capacities,
ERIC TURNER in his official and individual capacities,
KENNETH MARVIN in his official and individual capacities,
JOY A. BARTMON in her official and individual capacities,
JERALD BEER in his official and individual capacities,

BROAD & CASSEL, and, all of its Partners, Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and individual capacities,

KELLY OVERSTREET JOHNSON (former President) in her official and individual capacities,
JAMES J. WHEELER, in his professional and individual capacities,

FLORIDA SUPREME COURT,

Hon. Charles T. Wells, in his official and individual capacities,
Hon. Harry Lee Anstead,
in his official and individual capacities,
Hon. R. Fred Lewis,
in his official and individual capacities,
Hon. Peggy A. Quince,
in his official and individual capacities,
Hon. Kenneth B. Bell,
in his official and individual capacities,
THOMAS HALL, in his official and individual capacities,
DEBORAH YARBOROUGH in her official and individual capacities,

DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION – FLORIDA,

CITY OF BOCA RATON, FLA.,

ROBERT FLECHAUS in his official and individual capacities,
ANDREW SCOTT in his official and individual capacities,

SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION FIRST DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENTAL DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE,

THOMAS J. CAHILL in his official and individual capacities,
PAUL CURRAN in his official and individual capacities,
MARTIN R. GOLD in his official and individual capacities,

SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION FIRST DEPARTMENT,

CATHERINE O’HAGEN WOLFE in her official and individual capacities,
HON. ANGELA M. MAZZARELLI in her official and individual capacities,
HON. RICHARD T. ANDRIAS in his official and individual capacities,
HON. DAVID B. SAXE in his official and individual capacities,
HON. DAVID FRIEDMAN in his official and individual capacities,
HON. LUIZ A. GONZALES in his official and individual capacities,

SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT,

JAMES E. PELTZER in his official and individual capacities,
HON. A. GAIL PRUDENTI in her official and individual capacities,

SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION SECOND DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENTAL DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE,

LAWRENCE DIGIOVANNA in his official and individual capacities,
DIANA MAXFIELD KEARSE in her official and individual capacities,

HON. JUDITH  S. KAYE (Chief Judge of the State of New York, New York Court of Appeals)  in her official and individual  capacities,

STATE OF NEW YORK COMMISSION OF INVESTIGATION,

ANTHONY CARTUSCIELLO in his official and individual capacities,

LAWYERS FUND FOR CLIENT PROTECTION OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK,

ELIOT SPITZER in his official and individual capacities, as both former Attorney General for the State of New York, and, as former Governor of the State of New York,

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA,

VIRGINIA STATE BAR,

ANDREW H. GOODMAN in his official and individual capacities,
NOEL SENGEL in her official and individual capacities,
MARY W. MARTELINO in her official and individual capacities,
LIZBETH L. MILLER, in her official and individual capacities,

MPEGLA, LLC,

LAWRENCE HORN, in his professional and individual capacities,
 

KENNETH RUBENSTEIN, in his professional and individual capacities,

REAL 3D, INC. (INTEL, SILICON GRAPHICS, INC. & LOCKHEED MARTIN) and successor companies,

GERALD STANLEY, in his professional and individual capacities,
DAVID BOLTON, in his professional and individual capacities,
TIM CONNOLLY, in his professional and individual capacities,
ROSALIE BIBONA, in her professional and individual capacities,
RYJO, INC.,
RYAN HUISMAN, in his professional and individual capacities,

INTEL CORP.,

LARRY PALLEY, in his professional and individual capacities,

SILICON GRAPHICS, INC.,

LOCKHEED MARTIN,

BLAKELY SOKOLOFF TAYLOR & ZAFMAN, LLP, and, all of its Partners, Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and individual capacities,

NORMAN ZAFMAN, in his professional and individual capacities,
THOMAS COESTER, in his professional and individual capacities,
FARZAD AHMINI, in his professional and individual capacities,
GEORGE HOOVER, in his professional and individual capacities,

WILDMAN, HARROLD, ALLEN & DIXON LLP, and, all of its Partners, Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and individual capacities,

MARTYN W. MOLYNEAUX, in his professional and individual capacities,
MICHAEL DOCKTERMAN, in his professional and individual capacities,

HARRISON GOODARD FOOTE, and, all of its Partners, Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and individual capacities,

MARTYN W. MOLYNEAUX, in his professional and individual capacities,

EUROPEAN PATENT OFFICE,

ALAIN POMPIDOU (former President) in his official and individual capacities,
WIM VAN DER EIJK in his official and individual capacities,
LISE DYBDAHL in her official and personal capacities,

YAMAKAWA INTERNATIONAL PATENT OFFICE, and, all of its Partners, Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and individual capacities,

MASAKI YAMAKAWA, in his professional and individual capacities,

CROSSBOW VENTURES, INC.,

ALPINE VENTURE CAPITAL PARTNERS LP,

STEPHEN J. WARNER, in his professional and individual capacities,
RENE P. EICHENBERGER, in his professional and individual capacities,
H. HICKMAN “HANK” POWELL, in his professional and individual capacities,
MAURICE BUCHSBAUM, in his professional and individual capacities,
ERIC CHEN, in his professional and individual capacities,
AVI HERSH, in his professional and individual capacities,
MATTHEW SHAW, in his professional and individual capacities,
BRUCE W. SHEWMAKER, in his professional and individual capacities,
RAVI M. UGALE, in his professional and individual capacities,

Digital Interactive Streams, Inc.,

Royal o’brien, in his professional and individual capacities,

HUIZENGA HOLDINGS INCORPORATED,

WAYNE HUIZENGA, in his professional and individual capacities,

WAYNE HUIZENGA, JR., in his professional and individual capacities,

TIEDEMANN INVESTMENT GROUP,

BRUCE T. PROLOW, in his professional and individual capacities,
CARL TIEDEMANN, in his professional and individual capacities,
ANDREW PHILIP CHESLER, in his professional and individual capacities,
CRAIG L. SMITH, in his professional and individual capacities,

Houston & Shahady, P.a., and any successors, and, all of its Partners, Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and individual capacities,

BART A. HOUSTON, ESQ. in his professional and individual capacities,

FURR & COHEN, P.A., and, all of its Partners, Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and individual capacities,

BRADLEY S. SCHRAIBERG, ESQ. in his professional and individual capacities,

MOSKOWITZ, MANDELL, SALIM & SIMOWITZ, P.A., and, all of its Partners, Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and individual capacities,

WILLIAM G. SALIM, ESQ. in his professional and individual capacities,

SACHS SAX & KLEIN, P.A., and, all of its Partners, Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and individual capacities,

BEN ZUCKERMAN, ESQ. in his professional and individual capacities,
SPENCER M. SAX, in his professional and individual capacities,

SCHIFFRIN & BARROWAY LLP, and any successors, and, all of its Partners, Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and individual capacities,

RICHARD SCHIFFRIN, in his professional and individual capacities,
ANDREW BARROWAY, in his professional and individual capacities,
KRISHNA NARINE, in his professional and individual capacities,

CHRISTOPHER & WEISBERG, P.A., and, all of its Partners, Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and individual capacities,

ALAN M. WEISBERG, in his professional and individual capacities,
ALBERTO GONZALES in his official and individual capacities,
JOHNNIE E. FRAZIER in his official and individual capacities,

IVIEWIT, INC., a Florida corporation,
IVIEWIT, INC., a Delaware corporation,
IVIEWIT HOLDINGS, INC., a Delaware corporation (f.k.a. Uview.com, Inc.)UVIEW.COM, INC., a Delaware corporation
IVIEWIT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Delaware corporation (f.k.a. Iviewit Holdings, Inc.),
IVIEWIT HOLDINGS, INC., a Florida corporation,
IVIEWIT.COM, INC., a Florida corporation,
I.C., INC., a Florida corporation,
IVIEWIT.COM, INC., a Delaware corporation,
IVIEWIT.COM LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
IVIEWIT LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
IVIEWIT CORPORATION, a Florida corporation,

IBM CORPORATION,

JOHN AND JANE DOES.

 

Date Filed # Docket Text
12/12/2007 COMPLAINT against Catherine O'Hagen Wolfe (in their individual capacity), Paul Curran (in their official capacity), Paul Curran (in individual capacity), Martin R. Gold (in his individual capacity), Martin R. Gold (in their official capacity), Angela M. Mazzarelli (in her official capacity), Angela M. Mazzarelli (in her individual capacity), Richard T. Andrias (in his official capacity), Richard T. Andrias (in his individual capacity), David B. Saxe, David B. Saxe, David Friedman (in his official capacity), David Friedman (in his individual capacity), Luiz A. Gonzales (in his official capacity), Luiz A. Gonzales (in his individual capacity), Appellate Division Second Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee, Lawrence DiGiovanna (in his official capacity), Lawrence DiGiovanna (in his individual capacity), Diana Maxfield Kearse (in her official capacity), Diana Maxfield Kearse (in her individual capacity), James E. Peltzer (in his official capacity), James E. Peltzer (in his individual capacity), A. Gail Prudenti (in her official capacity), A. Gail Prudenti (in her individual capacity), Steven C. Krane (in his official capacity), Steven C. Krane (in his individual capacity), Judith S. Kaye, Judith S. Kaye, Kenneth Rubenstein, Estate of Stephen Kaye, Proskauer Rose LLP, Meltzer Lippe Goldstein & Breistone LLP, Lewis S. Meltzer, Raymond A. Joao, Foley Lardner LLP, Michael C. Grebe, William J. Dick, Douglas A. Boehm, Steven C. Becker, State of New York Commission of Investigation, Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee, Lawyers Fund for Client Protection of the State of New York, The Florida Bar, Lorraine Christine Hoffman (in her official capacity), Lorraine Christine Hoffman (in her individual capacity), Eric Turner (in his official capacity), Eric Turner (in his individual capacity), John Anthony Boggs (in his official capacity), John Anthony Boggs (in his individual capacity), Kenneth Marvin (in his official capacity), Kenneth Marvin (in his individual capacity), Thomas J. Cahill (in his official capacity), Thomas Hall (in his official capacity), Thomas Hall (in his individual capacity), Debroah Yarborough (in her official capacity), Debroah Yarborough (in her individual capacity), Virginia State Bar, Andrew H. Goodman (in his official capacity), Andrew H. Goodman (in his individual capacity), Noel Sengel (in her official capacity), Noel Sengel (in her individual capacity), Mary W. Martelino, Thomas J. Cahill (in his individual capacity), John Does, Joseph Wigley (in his official capacity), Joseph Wigley (in his individual capacity), Catherine O'Hagen Wolfe (in their official capacity). (Filing Fee $ 350.00, Receipt Number 635712)Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually), Eliot I. Bernstein, P. Stephen Lamont.(mbe) (Entered: 12/14/2007)
12/12/2007   SUMMONS ISSUED as to Catherine O'Hagen Wolfe (in their individual capacity), Paul Curran (in their official capacity), Paul Curran (in individual capacity), Martin R. Gold (in his individual capacity), Martin R. Gold (in their official capacity), Angela M. Mazzarelli (in her official capacity), Angela M. Mazzarelli (in her individual capacity), Richard T. Andrias (in his official capacity), Richard T. Andrias (in his individual capacity), David B. Saxe, David B. Saxe, David Friedman (in his official capacity), David Friedman (in his individual capacity), Luiz A. Gonzales (in his official capacity), Luiz A. Gonzales (in his individual capacity), Appellate Division Second Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee, Lawrence DiGiovanna (in his official capacity), Lawrence DiGiovanna (in his individual capacity), Diana Maxfield Kearse (in her official capacity), Diana Maxfield Kearse (in her individual capacity), James E. Peltzer (in his official capacity), James E. Peltzer (in his individual capacity), A. Gail Prudenti (in her official capacity), A. Gail Prudenti (in her individual capacity), Steven C. Krane (in his official capacity), Steven C. Krane (in his individual capacity), Judith S. Kaye, Judith S. Kaye, Kenneth Rubenstein, Estate of Stephen Kaye, Proskauer Rose LLP, Meltzer Lippe Goldstein & Breistone LLP, Lewis S. Meltzer, Raymond A. Joao, Foley Lardner LLP, Michael C. Grebe, William J. Dick, Douglas A. Boehm, Steven C. Becker, State of New York Commission of Investigation, Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee, Lawyers Fund for Client Protection of the State of New York, The Florida Bar, Lorraine Christine Hoffman (in her official capacity), Lorraine Christine Hoffman (in her individual capacity), Eric Turner (in his official capacity), Eric Turner (in his individual capacity), John Anthony Boggs (in his official capacity), John Anthony Boggs (in his individual capacity), Kenneth Marvin (in his official capacity), Kenneth Marvin (in his individual capacity), Thomas J. Cahill (in his official capacity), Thomas Hall (in his official capacity), Thomas Hall (in his individual capacity), Debroah Yarborough (in her official capacity), Debroah Yarborough (in her individual capacity), Virginia State Bar, Andrew H. Goodman (in his official capacity), Andrew H. Goodman (in his individual capacity), Noel Sengel (in her official capacity), Noel Sengel (in her individual capacity), Mary W. Martelino, Thomas J. Cahill (in his individual capacity), John Does, Joseph Wigley (in his official capacity), Joseph Wigley (in his individual capacity), Catherine O'Hagen Wolfe (in their official capacity). (mbe) (Entered: 12/14/2007)
12/12/2007   CASE REFERRED TO Judge Shira A. Scheindlin as possibly related to 1:07-cv-9599. (mbe) (Entered: 12/14/2007)
12/21/2007   CASE ACCEPTED AS RELATED. Create association to 1:07-cv-09599-SAS. Notice of Assignment to follow. (laq) (Entered: 01/10/2008)
12/21/2007 NOTICE OF CASE ASSIGNMENT to Judge Shira A. Scheindlin. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (laq) (Entered: 01/10/2008)
12/21/2007   Magistrate Judge Douglas F. Eaton is so designated. (laq) (Entered: 01/10/2008)
12/26/2007 MOTION for appointment of pro bono counsel; MOTION for Extension of Time to file amended complaint after original complaint has been filed on some or all of the defendants; MOTION for order for the United States Marshal Service to serve papers on remaining or all of the defendants; MOTION to accept limited power of attorney of plaintiff Bernstein and Plaintiff Lamont Accept Remote appearance of plaintiff Bernstein for Court Proceedings; and Physical Protection of Plaintiffs for Court Appearances. Attached is Affidavit in Support. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually), Eliot I. Bernstein. (djc) (Entered: 01/08/2008)
12/26/2007 DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually). (djc) (Entered: 01/09/2008)
1/10/2008   Mailed notice to the attorney(s) of record. (laq) (Entered: 01/10/2008)
1/10/2008 5 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 2 Motion to Appoint Counsel ; granting in part and denying in part 2 Motion for Extension of Time; granting in part and denying in part 2 Motion to Serve; granting in part and denying in part 2 Motion. For the reasons stated above, plaintiffs' motions are granted in part and denied in part. The United States Marshals are directed to serve the Complaint on defendants. Plaintiffs will have until twenty days after service is completed on all defendants to file an amended complaint. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close these motions (document no. 2 on the docket sheet). (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 1/9/2008)(jmi) (Entered: 01/11/2008)
1/23/2008   AMENDED SUMMONS ISSUED as to Catherine O'Hagen Wolfe (in their individual capacity), Paul Curran (in their official capacity), Paul Curran (in individual capacity), Martin R. Gold (in his individual capacity), Martin R. Gold (in their official capacity), Angela M. Mazzarelli (in her official capacity), Angela M. Mazzarelli (in her individual capacity), Richard T. Andrias (in his official capacity), Richard T. Andrias (in his individual capacity), David B. Saxe, David B. Saxe, David Friedman (in his official capacity), David Friedman (in his individual capacity), Luiz A. Gonzales (in his official capacity), Luiz A. Gonzales (in his individual capacity), Appellate Division Second Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee, Lawrence DiGiovanna (in his official capacity), Lawrence DiGiovanna (in his individual capacity), Diana Maxfield Kearse (in her official capacity), Diana Maxfield Kearse (in her individual capacity), James E. Peltzer (in his official capacity), James E. Peltzer (in his individual capacity), A. Gail Prudenti (in her official capacity), A. Gail Prudenti (in her individual capacity), Steven C. Krane (in his official capacity), Steven C. Krane (in his individual capacity), Judith S. Kaye, Judith S. Kaye, Kenneth Rubenstein, Estate of Stephen Kaye, Proskauer Rose LLP, Meltzer Lippe Goldstein & Breistone LLP, Lewis S. Meltzer, Raymond A. Joao, Foley Lardner LLP, Michael C. Grebe, William J. Dick, Douglas A. Boehm, Steven C. Becker, State of New York Commission of Investigation, Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee, Lawyers Fund for Client Protection of the State of New York, The Florida Bar, Lorraine Christine Hoffman (in her official capacity), Lorraine Christine Hoffman (in her individual capacity), Eric Turner (in his official capacity), Eric Turner (in his individual capacity), John Anthony Boggs (in his official capacity), John Anthony Boggs (in his individual capacity), Kenneth Marvin (in his official capacity), Kenneth Marvin (in his individual capacity), Thomas J. Cahill (in his official capacity), Thomas Hall (in his official capacity), Thomas Hall (in his individual capacity), Debroah Yarborough (in her official capacity), Debroah Yarborough (in her individual capacity), Virginia State Bar, Andrew H. Goodman (in his official capacity), Andrew H. Goodman (in his individual capacity), Noel Sengel (in her official capacity), Noel Sengel (in her individual capacity), Mary W. Martelino, Thomas J. Cahill (in his individual capacity), John Does, Joseph Wigley (in his official capacity), Joseph Wigley (in his individual capacity), Catherine O'Hagen Wolfe (in their official capacity). (tro) (Entered: 01/25/2008)
1/25/2008 MISSING FROM DOCKET Court Memorandum to Serve 2 Copies of Complaint as Courtesy to the Attorney General [Andrew Cuomo]
2/19/2008 MISSING FROM DOCKET RE: MISSING COMPLAINTS TO US MARSHALL FOR SERVICE IN CASE

07 CIV. 11196 (SAS) ELIOT I. BERNSTEIN, ET AL. V. APPELLATE DIVISION FIRST DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENTAL DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE, ET AL.

3/5/2008 MISSING FROM DOCKET Re: Plaintiffs Opposition to State Defendants Letter of February 29, 2008 in Eliot I. Bernstein, et al. v. Appellate Division, First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee, et al.,
Docket No. 07 CV 11196 (SAS)
3/5/2008 MISSING FROM DOCKET Re: Plaintiffs Opposition to Proskauer Rose March 4, 2008 to this Court in Eliot I. Bernstein, et al. v. Appellate Division, First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee, et al.,
Docket No. 07 CV 11196 (SAS)
3/7/2008 6 MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. David B. Saxe served on 2/28/2008, answer due 3/19/2008; David B. Saxe served on 2/28/2008, answer due 3/19/2008. Service was accepted by David B. Saxe. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein. (dle) (Entered: 03/10/2008)
3/10/2008 7 ORDER: I have considered plaintiffs' request and have determined that the Attorney General does not face an improper conflict of interest in representing the State Defendants. If, however, the Attorney General concludes that an investigation of defendants is warranted, then independent counsel would be required. Plaintiffs request that the Court find that defendant Raymond A. Joao's counsel, alleged to be John W. Fried is conflicted because Fried will be required to testify and may be added as a defendant. Plaintiffs' request is denied at this time. Plaintiff also request that the Court reconsider its earlier denial of plaintiffs' request for pro bono counsel. Plaintiffs have presented no such decisions or factual matters. The Request is denied. Defendants time to return waivers of personal service is hereby extended until March 21, 2008. Defendants shall move or answer no later than May 30, 2008. (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 3/7/2008) (jpo) (Entered: 03/10/2008)
3/11/2008 MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Martin R. Gold (in his individual capacity) served on 2/29/2008, answer due 3/20/2008; Martin R. Gold (in their official capacity) served on 2/29/2008, answer due 3/20/2008. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein. (jmi) (Entered: 03/14/2008)
3/13/2008 MISSING FROM DOCKET Re: Plaintiffs Opposition to Court Order dated March 7, 2008 in Eliot I. Bernstein, et al. v. Appellate Division, First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee, et al.,
Docket No. 07 CV 11196 (SAS)
3/14/2008 MISSING FROM DOCKET Letter to New York Attorney General to reinvestigate prior Iviewit complaints against public office corruption based on the new information in Anderson
3/14/2008 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE. John Anthony Boggs (in his official capacity) served on 3/4/2008, answer due 3/24/2008. Service was accepted by John Anthony Boggs. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein. (djc) (Entered: 03/17/2008)
3/19/2008 10 MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE UNEXECUTED as to Debroah Yarborough (in her official capacity). Attempted Service of Summons and Complaint. Service was attempted on 3/12/08. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually), Eliot I. Bernstein. (pl) (Entered: 03/20/2008)
3/21/2008 11 ORDER: plaintiffs are again reminded that pursuant to Standing Order M10-468, all communications with the Court, including all motions and letters are to be directed to the Court's Pro Se Office, not to chambers. Violation of the Standing Order may lead to a finding of contempt of court. Plaintiffs have requested reconsideration of the Court's Order dated March 7, 2008. The Court declines to revisit its earlier decision. Plaintiffs have also requested legal advice on several topics. The Court does not give legal advice to parties. Plaintiffs have requested legal advice on several topics. The Court does not give legal advice to parties. Plaintiffs have requested that the Court notify the appropriate authorities of defendants' alleged criminal misconduct. At this early stage of the litigation, such notification would be both inappropriate and premature. Finally, plaintiffs have requested permission to make use of the Court's electronic case filing and case management system. At this time, permission to do so is denied. Any further consideration of the substantive issues raised by plaintiffs, including plaintiffs' requests regarding conflicts of interest, must await the resolution of anticipated motions to dismiss. (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 3/21/08) (tro) (Entered: 03/21/2008)
3/21/2008 12  MOTION to Dismiss pursuant to F. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(2) and (6). (Attached is the Declaration of Glenn T. Burhans, Jr., in Support of The Florida Bar Defendants' Motion to Dismiss.) Document filed by The Florida Bar, Lorraine Christine Hoffman (in her individual capacity), Eric Turner (in his official capacity), John Anthony Boggs (in his official capacity), Kenneth Marvin (in his official capacity). (rw) (Entered: 03/24/2008)
3/21/2008 13  MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support of the Florida Bar Defendants' Motion to dismiss the Complaint pursuant to F.R.C.P. 12(b)and (6). Document filed by The Florida Bar, Lorraine Christine Hoffman (in her official capacity), Eric Turner (in his official capacity), John Anthony Boggs (in his official capacity), Kenneth Marvin (in his individual capacity). (jpo) (Entered: 03/24/2008)
3/24/2008 14 ORDER all defendants that seek to move to dismiss must so move and submit memoranda of law no later than May 30, 2008. Plaintiffs' response is due on June 30, 2008. Defendants' reply, if any, is due on July 14, 2008. The parties are reminded that the restrictions on page limits and exhibits detailed in the Court's Individual Rules and Procedures are in effect, and memoranda of law that do not comply with these Rules will be rejected. SO ORDERED. (Responses due by 6/30/2008, Replies due by 7/14/2008.) (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 3/24/2008) (jmi) (Entered: 03/25/2008)
3/24/2008 15  MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Proskauer Rose LLP served on 3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008. Service was accepted by Greg Mashberg. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein. (dle) (Entered: 03/25/2008)
3/24/2008 16  MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Kenneth Rubenstein served on 3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008. Service was accepted by Greg Mashberg. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein. (dle) (Entered: 03/25/2008)
3/24/2008 17  MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Steven C. Krane (in his official capacity) served on 3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008; Steven C. Krane (in his individual capacity) served on 3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008. Service was accepted by Gregg Mashberg. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein. (dle) (Entered: 03/25/2008)
3/24/2008 18  MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Estate of Stephen Kaye served on 3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008. Service was accepted by Gregg Mashberg. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein. (dle) (Entered: 03/25/2008)
3/24/2008 20  MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Mary W. Martelino served on 3/14/2008, answer due 4/3/2008. Service was accepted by Stephen Hall. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein. (dle) (Entered: 03/25/2008)
3/24/2008 21  MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Virginia State Bar served on 3/14/2008, answer due 4/3/2008. Service was accepted by Stephen Hall. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein. (dle) (Entered: 03/25/2008)
3/24/2008 22  MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Noel Sengel (in her official capacity) served on 3/14/2008, answer due 4/3/2008; Noel Sengel (in her individual capacity) served on 3/14/2008, answer due 4/3/2008. Service was accepted by Stephen Hall. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein. (dle) (Entered: 03/25/2008)
3/24/2008 23  MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Andrew H. Goodman (in his official capacity) served on 3/14/2008, answer due 4/3/2008; Andrew H. Goodman (in his individual capacity) served on 3/14/2008, answer due 4/3/2008. Service was accepted by Stephen Hall. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein. (dle) (Entered: 03/25/2008)
3/25/2008

 

19 FILING ERROR - ELECTRONIC FILING IN NON-ECF CASE - NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by John Walter Fried on behalf of Raymond A. Joao (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit of Service)(Fried, John) Modified on 3/26/2008 (db). (Entered: 03/25/20
3/25/2008 24  NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Monica Anne Connell on behalf of Catherine O'Hagen Wolfe (in their individual capacity), Paul Curran (in their official capacity), Paul Curran (in individual capacity), Martin R. Gold (in his individual capacity), Martin R. Gold (in their official capacity), Angela M. Mazzarelli (in her official capacity), Angela M. Mazzarelli (in her individual capacity), Richard T. Andrias (in his official capacity), Richard T. Andrias (in his individual capacity), David B. Saxe, David B. Saxe, David Friedman (in his official capacity), David Friedman (in his individual capacity), Luiz A. Gonzales (in his official capacity), Luiz A. Gonzales (in his individual capacity), Appellate Division Second Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee, Lawrence DiGiovanna (in his official capacity), Lawrence DiGiovanna (in his individual capacity), Diana Maxfield Kearse (in her official capacity), Diana Maxfield Kearse (in her individual capacity), James E. Peltzer (in his official capacity), James E. Peltzer (in his individual capacity), A. Gail Prudenti (in her official capacity), A. Gail Prudenti (in her individual capacity), Judith S. Kaye, Judith S. Kaye, State of New York Commission of Investigation, Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee, Lawyers Fund for Client Protection of the State of New York, Thomas J. Cahill (in his official capacity), Thomas J. Cahill (in his individual capacity), Joseph Wigley (in his official capacity), Joseph Wigley (in his individual capacity), Catherine O'Hagen Wolfe (in their official capacity) (dle) (Entered: 03/26/2008)
3/26/2008   ***NOTE TO ATTORNEY TO RE-FILE DOCUMENT - NON-ECF CASE ERROR. Note to Attorney John Walter Fried to MANUALLY RE-FILE Document Notice of Appearance, Document No. 19. This case is not ECF. (db) (Entered: 03/26/2008)
3/26/2008 25  NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by John Walter Fried on behalf of Raymond A. Joao. (jco) (Entered: 03/27/2008)
3/27/2008 26  MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Michael C. Grebe served on 3/16/2008, answer due 5/30/2008. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein; P. Stephen Lamont. (pl) (Entered: 03/31/2008)
3/27/2008 27  MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Lorraine Christine Hoffman (in her official capacity) served on 3/5/2008, answer due 3/25/2008. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein; P. Stephen Lamont. (pl) (Entered: 03/31/2008)
3/27/2008 28  MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Judith S. Kaye served on 3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein; P. Stephen Lamont. (pl) (Entered: 03/31/2008)
3/27/2008 29  MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Lawyers Fund for Client Protection of the State of New York served on 3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein; P. Stephen Lamont. (pl) (Entered: 03/31/2008)
3/27/2008 30  MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. State of New York Commission of Investigation served on 3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein; P. Stephen Lamont. (pl) (Entered: 03/31/2008)
3/27/2008 31  MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Paul Curran (in individual capacity) served on 3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein; P. Stephen Lamont. (pl) (Entered: 03/31/2008)
3/27/2008 32  MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Angela M. Mazzarelli (in her official capacity) served on 3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein; P. Stephen Lamont. (pl) (Entered: 03/31/2008)
3/27/2008 33  MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. James E. Peltzer (in his official capacity) served on 3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein; P. Stephen Lamont. (pl) (Entered: 03/31/2008)
3/27/2008 34  MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Joseph Wigley (in his official capacity) served on 3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein; P. Stephen Lamont. (pl) (Entered: 03/31/2008)
3/27/2008 35  MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Catherine O'Hagen Wolfe (in their official capacity) served on 3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein; P. Stephen Lamont. (pl) (Entered: 03/31/2008)
3/27/2008 36  MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Richard T. Andrias (in his official capacity) served on 3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein; P. Stephen Lamont. (pl) (Entered: 03/31/2008)
3/27/2008 37  MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Thomas J. Cahill (in his official capacity) served on 3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein; P. Stephen Lamont. (pl) (Entered: 03/31/2008)
3/27/2008 38  MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Diana Maxfield Kearse (in her official capacity) served on 3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein; P. Stephen Lamont. (pl) (Entered: 03/31/2008)
3/27/2008 39  MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. A. Gail Prudenti (in her official capacity) served on 3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein; P. Stephen Lamont. (pl) (Entered: 03/31/2008)
3/27/2008 40  MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Lawrence DiGiovanna (in his official capacity) served on 3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein; P. Stephen Lamont. (pl) (Entered: 03/31/2008)
3/27/2008 41  MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Appellate Division Second Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee served on 3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein; P. Stephen Lamont. (pl) (Entered: 03/31/2008)
3/27/2008 42  MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. David Friedman (in his official capacity) served on 3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein; P. Stephen Lamont. (pl) (Entered: 03/31/2008)
3/27/2008 43  MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Luiz A. Gonzales (in his official capacity) served on 3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein; P. Stephen Lamont. (pl) (Entered: 03/31/2008)
3/27/2008 44  MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Kenneth Marvin (in his official capacity) served on 3/17/2008, answer due 4/7/2008. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein; P. Stephen Lamont. (pl) (Entered: 03/31/2008)
3/27/2008 45  MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee served on 3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein; P. Stephen Lamont. (pl) (Entered: 03/31/2008)
03/28/2008 MISSING FROM DOCKET Scheindlin Order regarding Foley Acting as Counsel
3/31/2008 46  ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Judge Shira A. Scheindlin from Kent K. Anker dated 3/28/2008 re: Requesting that defendants Foley & Lardner LLP, Steven C. Becker, Douglas A. Boehm, William J. Dick, and Michael W. Grebe be granted an extension of time to respond to plaintiffs' complaint. ENDORSEMENT: Defendants request is granted. Plaintiffs response is due June 30, 2008, Defendants' reply is due July 14, 2008. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 3/28/2008) (jpo) (Entered: 03/31/2008)
4/1/2008 MISSING FROM DOCKET Motion in Opposition to Florida Bar Motion to Dismiss Part 1 - Conflicts
04/07/2008 47  MOTION to Allow Filling of an Amend/Correct 1 Complaint. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually), Eliot I. Bernstein. (jmi) (Entered: 04/08/2008)
04/07/2008  48 MOTION in Opposition to Defendants re: 12 MOTION to Dismiss Based on Material and Substantial Evidence. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually), Eliot I. Bernstein. (jmi) (Entered: 04/08/2008)
4/7/2008   Motion in Opposition to Florida Bar Motion to Dismiss Part 2
04/08/2008  49

Missing Document

ORDER: The Court has received a document styled "opposition to Defendants Motion to dismiss." from plaintiffs. This document was apparently sent directly to Chambers, not to the Courts Pro Se Office. Because plaintiffs have failed to comply with the Court's standing order this document is rejected. If plaintiff seeks to file a motion they must do so through the Court's Pro SE Office. The time for defendants to move to dismiss is extended to May 30, 2008, plaintiffs response is due by June 30, 2008 Defendants reply is due July 14, 2008. (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 4/8/2008) (jpo) (Entered: 04/09/2008 )
04/11/2008   50 MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Raymond A. Joao served on 3/25/2008, answer due 5/30/2008. Service was accepted by John W. Fried. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein. (dle) (Entered: 04/11/2008)
04/11/2008  51 MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. William J. Dick served on 3/25/2008, answer due 5/30/2008. Service was accepted by William J. Dick. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein. (dle) (Entered: 04/11/2008)
04/11/2008   52 MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Douglas A. Boehm served on 3/24/2008, answer due 5/30/2008. Service was accepted by Douglas Boehm. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein. (dle) (Entered: 04/11/2008)
04/11/2008   53 MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Steven C. Becker served on 3/24/2008, answer due 5/30/2008. Service was accepted by Steven Becker. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein. (dle) (Entered: 04/11/2008)
04/11/2008   54 MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Foley Lardner LLP served on 3/20/2008, answer due 5/30/2008. Service was accepted by James R. Clark. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein. (dle) (Entered: 04/11/2008)
04/15/2000 NOT DOCKETED FINAL SENT TO COURT and Letter to Virginia Bar Counsel Attorney General Hall re phone conversation and conflicts
4/15/2008 NOT DOCKETED Proskauer Request to not be served via email
04/15/2008   55 ORDER that the Court has received plaintiffs' request to file an Amended Complaint. Plaintiffs' request is granted. The Amended Complaint must be filed no later than 5/10/08. Notwithstanding the filing of the Amended Complaint, defendants' deadline to move to dismiss or file an Answer remains 5/30/08. Plaintiffs' response remains due on 6/30/08. Defendants' reply, if any, remains due on 7/14/08. The parties are again reminded that the restrictions on page limits and exhibits detailed in the Court's Individual Rules and Procedures are in effect, and memoranda of law that do not comply with these Rules will be rejected. (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 4/14/08) (dle) (Entered: 04/15/2008)
04/21/2008 Not Docketed 20080421 FINAL SIGNED Motion for Pro Bono Counsel
04/22/2008 Not Docketed Friedkin Anker for Foley Deny Email Service
04/24/2008  56 MOTION for Stephen Hall to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Document filed by Virginia State Bar, Andrew H. Goodman (in his official capacity), Andrew H. Goodman (in his individual capacity), Noel Sengel (in her official capacity), Noel Sengel (in her individual capacity), Mary W. Martelino. (dle) (Entered: 04/25/2008)
04/29/2008  n/a CASHIERS OFFICE REMARK on 56 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, in the amount of $25.00, paid on 04/24/2008, Receipt Number 649058. (jd) (Entered: 04/29/2008)
05/02/2008 NOT DOCKETED Foley Anker Appearance and letter re Conflicts
05/02/2008 NOT DOCKETED Foley Anker to Bernstein to stop contacting Foley
05/02/2008  57 DECLARATION of Kent K. Anker RESPONSE to Plaintiffs' Motion for Pro Bono Counsel. Document filed by Foley Lardner LLP, Michael C. Grebe, William J. Dick, Douglas A. Boehm, Steven C. Becker. (jmi) (Entered: 05/05/2008)
05/02/2008   58 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by Foley Lardner LLP, Michael C. Grebe, William J. Dick, Douglas A. Boehm, Steven C. Becker. (jmi) (Entered: 05/05/2008)
05/02/2008  59 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Lili Zandpour, Kent Kari Anker on behalf of Foley Lardner LLP, Michael C. Grebe, William J. Dick, Douglas A. Boehm, Steven C. Becker (jmi) (Entered: 05/05/2008)
05/09/2008 NOT DOCKETED Proskauer letter to Scheindlin to block service of amended complaint
05/09/2008 60 ORDER: Service of any amended complaint will be stayed until such time as the scheduled motions to dismiss have been decided. Accordingly, the time for newly named defendants to respond to the Complaint is hereby stayed until after the Court has ruled on those motions. This Order is subject to reconsideration upon receipt of opposition, if any, from plaintiffs. (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 5/9/08) (tro) (Entered: 05/12/2008)
05/12/2008 61 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Joanna Frances Smith on behalf of Steven C. Krane (in his individual capacity), Kenneth Rubenstein, Proskauer Rose LLP (pl) (Entered: 05/13/2008)
05/12/2008  62 MOTION for a pro se office to copy and transmit amended complaint to U.S. Marshal's Office. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually), P. Stephen Lamont. (pl) (Entered: 05/13/2008)
05/13/2008 63 ORDER granting 56 Motion for Stephen M. Hall to Appear Pro Hac Vice. (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 5/13/08) (mme) (Entered: 05/13/2008)
05/12/2008  87

Note number totally out of order and no new defendants added

AMENDED COMPLAINT amending 1 Complaint,,,,,,,,,,, against Catherine O'Hagen Wolfe(in their individual capacity), Paul Curran(in their official capacity), Paul Curran(in individual capacity), Martin R. Gold(in his individual capacity), Martin R. Gold(in thier offical capacity), Angela M. Mazzarelli(in her official capacity), Angela M. Mazzarelli(in her individual capacity), Richard T. Andrias(in his official capacity), Richard T. Andrias(in his individual capacity), David B. Saxe, David B. Saxe, David Friedman(in his official capacity), David Friedman(in his individual capacity), Luiz A. Gonzales(in his official capacity), Luiz A. Gonzales(in his individual capacity), Appellate Division Second Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee, Lawrence DiGiovanna(in his official capacity), Lawrence DiGiovanna(in his individual capacity), Diana Maxfield Kearse(in her official capacity), Diana Maxfield Kearse(in her individual capacity), James E. Peltzer(in his offical capacity), James E. Peltzer(in his individual capcity), A. Gail Prudenti(in her offical capacity), A. Gail Prudenti(in her individual capacity), Steven C. Krane(in his official capacity), Steven C. Krane(in his individual capacity), Judith S. Kaye, Judith S. Kaye, Kenneth Rubenstein, Estate of Stephen Kaye, Proskauer Rose LLP, Meltzer Lippe Goldstein & Breistone LLP, Lewis S. Meltzer, Raymond A. Joao, Foley Lardner LLP, Michael C. Grebe, William J. Dick, Douglas A. Boehm, Steven C. Becker, State of New York Commission of Investigation, Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee, Lawyers Fund for Client Protection of the State of New York, The Florida Bar, Lorraine Christine Hoffman(in her official capacity), Lorraine Christine Hoffman(in her individual capacity), Eric Turner(in his official capacity), Eric Turner(in his individual capacity), John Anthony Boggs(in his official capacity), John Anthony Boggs(in his individual capacity), Kenneth Marvin(in his official capacity), Kenneth Marvin(in his individual capacity), Thomas J. Cahill(in his official capacity), Thomas Hall(in his official capacity), Thomas Hall(in his individual capacity), Debroah Yarborough(in her official capacity), Debroah Yarborough(in her individual capacity), Virginia State Bar, Andrew H. Goodman(in his official capacity), Andrew H. Goodman(in his individual capacity), Noel Sengel(in her official capacity), Noel Sengel(in her individual capacity), Mary W. Martelino, Thomas J. Cahill(in his individual capacity), John Does, Joseph Wigley(in his official capacity), Joseph Wigley(in his individual capacity), Catherine O'Hagen Wolfe(in their official capacity).Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein(Individually), Eliot I. Bernstein, P. Stephen Lamont. Related document: 1 Complaint,,,,,,,,,,, filed by P. Stephen Lamont, Eliot I. Bernstein.(dle) (Entered: 07/03/2008)
05/13/2008 NOT DOCKETED Request for Clarification on Order dated May 9th 2008
05/13/2008 NOT DOCKETED Proskauer Request for Amended Complaint
05/13/2008 NOT DOCKETED Scheindlin Order Denying Pro Se Copying
05/14/2008 64 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on re: 62 MOTION for a pro se office to copy and transmit amended complaint to U.S. Marshal's Office. filed by P. Stephen Lamont, Eliot I. Bernstein ENDORSEMENT; In accordance with this court's order dated May 9, 2008, service of any amended complaint is stayed until such the as the scheduled motions to dismiss are decided. Plaintiff's motion is therefore denied with leave to renew after that time. (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 5/13/08) (mme) (Entered: 05/14/2008)
05/22/2008 65 MOTION IN OPPOSITION TO 60 STAY ORDER dated 5/9/08 - REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION ORDER. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually), Eliot I. Bernstein, P. Stephen Lamont. (db) (Entered: 05/22/2008)
05/28/2008 NOT DOCKETED Court returns Motion for Pro Bono to Refile
05/28/2008 66 MOTION for an order of dismissal, under FRCP Rule 12 dismissing the Complaint in this action as to the Virginia Defendants in its entirety. Document filed by Virginia State Bar, Andrew H. Goodman (in his official capacity), Andrew H. Goodman (in his individual capacity), Noel Sengel (in her official capacity), Noel Sengel (in her individual capacity), Mary W. Martelino. (dle) (Entered: 05/29/2008)
05/28/2008 67 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 66 MOTION to Dismiss. Document filed by Virginia State Bar, Andrew H. Goodman (in his official capacity), Andrew H. Goodman (in his individual capacity), Noel Sengel (in her official capacity), Noel Sengel (in her individual capacity), Mary W. Martelino. (dle) (Entered: 05/29/2008)
05/30/2008 68 MOTION for an order pursuant to F.R.C.P. 12(b)(2) and (6) to Dismiss the Amended Complaint; w/ attch. Declaration in support. Document filed by Lorraine Christine Hoffman (in her official capacity), Eric Turner (in his official capacity), John Anthony Boggs (in his official capacity), Kenneth Marvin (in his official capacity). (pl) (Entered: 05/30/2008)
05/30/2008 69 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 68 MOTION to Dismiss.. Document filed by Lorraine Christine Hoffman (in her official capacity), John Anthony Boggs (in his official capacity), Kenneth Marvin (in his official capacity, et al. (pl) (Entered: 05/30/2008)
05/30/2008 70 FILING ERROR - ELECTRONIC FILING IN NON-ECF CASE - CROSS MOTION to Dismiss Complaint. Document filed by Meltzer Lippe Goldstein & Breistone LLP, Lewis S. Meltzer. (Howard, Richard) Modified on 6/2/2008 (KA). (Entered: 05/30/2008)

old entry below

CROSS MOTION to Dismiss Complaint. Document filed by Meltzer Lippe Goldstein & Breistone LLP, Lewis S. Meltzer. (Howard, Richard) (Entered: 05/30/2008)

05/30/2008 71 FILING ERROR - ELECTRONIC FILING IN NON-ECF CASE - AFFIDAVIT of Richard M. Howard, Esq. in Support re: 70 CROSS MOTION to Dismiss Complaint. Document filed by Meltzer Lippe Goldstein & Breistone LLP, Lewis S. Meltzer. (Howard, Richard) Modified on 6/2/2008 (KA). (Entered: 05/30/2008)

old entry

AFFIDAVIT of Richard M. Howard, Esq. in Support re: 70 CROSS MOTION to Dismiss Complaint.. Document filed by Meltzer Lippe Goldstein & Breistone LLP, Lewis S. Meltzer. (Howard, Richard) (Entered: 05/30/2008)

05/30/2008 72 FILING ERROR - ELECTRONIC FILING IN NON-ECF CASE - AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of Notice of Cross Motion with Affidavit in Support served on Elliot I. Bernstein, P. Stephen Lamont, Monica Connell, Esq., Gregg M. Mashberg, Esq., Glenn T. Burhans, Jr., Esq., John W. Fried, Esq. on May 30, 2008. Service was made by Mail. Document filed by Meltzer Lippe Goldstein & Breistone LLP, Lewis S. Meltzer. (Howard, Richard) Modified on 6/2/2008 (KA). (Entered: 05/30/2008)

old entry

AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of Notice of Cross Motion with Affidavit in Support served on Eliot I. Bernstein, P. Stephen Lamont, Monica Connell, Esq., Gregg M. Mashberg, Esq., Glenn T. Burhans, Jr., Esq., John W. Fried, Esq. on May 30, 2008. Service was made by Mail. Document filed by Meltzer Lippe Goldstein & Breistone LLP, Lewis S. Meltzer. (Howard, Richard) (Entered: 05/30/2008)

05/30/2008 73 MOTION to Dismiss the Amended Complaint. Document filed by State of New York Commission of Investigation et al. (cd) (Entered: 06/02/2008)
05/30/2008  74 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 73 MOTION to Dismiss.. Document filed by State of New York Commission of Investigation et al. (cd) (Entered: 06/02/2008)
and
Exhibit Court Case
05/30/2008 75 MOTION for an order pursuant to Rules 8 (a)(2), 9(b), 12(b)(1), and 12(b)(6), of the F.R.C.P. to Dismiss the Amended Complaint. Document filed by Raymond A. Joao. (pl) (Entered: 06/02/2008)
05/30/2008 76 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 75 MOTION to Dismiss. Document filed by Raymond A. Joao. (pl) (Entered: 06/02/2008)
05/30/2008 77 DECLARATION of John W. Fried in Support re: 75 MOTION to Dismiss.. Document filed by Raymond A. Joao. (pl) (Entered: 06/02/2008)
05/30/2008 78 MOTION to Dismiss the Complaint and Amended Complaint, with prejudice. Document filed by Steven C. Krane (in his individual capacity), Kenneth Rubenstein, Estate of Stephen Kaye, Proskauer Rose LLP. (cd) (Entered: 06/02/2008)
05/30/2008 79 DECLARATION of Joanna Smith in Support re: 78 MOTION to Dismiss. Document filed by Steven C. Krane (in his official capacity), Kenneth Rubenstein, Estate of Stephen Kaye, Proskauer Rose LLP. (cd) (Entered: 06/02/2008)
05/30/2008 80 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 78 MOTION to Dismiss. Document filed by Steven C. Krane (in his individual capacity), Kenneth Rubenstein, Estate of Stephen Kaye, Proskauer Rose LLP. (cd) (Entered: 06/02/2008)
05/30/2008 81 MOTION for an order pursuant to F.R.C.P. 9(b) and 12(b)(b) dismissing the original and amended complaints. Document filed by Foley Lardner LLP, Michael C. Grebe, William J. Dick, Douglas A. Boehm, Steven C. Becker.(pl) (Entered: 06/02/2008)
05/30/2008 82 DECLARATION of Lili Zandpour in Support re: 81 MOTION to Dismiss.. Document filed by Foley Lardner LLP, Michael C. Grebe, William J. Dick, Douglas A. Boehm, Steven C. Becker. (pl) (Entered: 06/02/2008)
05/31/2008 NOT DOCKETED Rule 26 Letter to Anker Foley

Rule 26 Letter to Connell NYAG

Rule 26 Letter to Fried

Rule 26 Letter to Greenberg Traurig & Florida Supreme Court & Florida Bar

Rule 26 Letter to Meltzer

Rule 26 Letter to Proskauer

Rule 26 Letter to Virginia Bar Hall

06/02/2008    ***NOTE TO ATTORNEY TO RE-FILE DOCUMENT - NON-ECF CASE ERROR. Note to Attorney Richard M. Howard to MANUALLY RE-FILE Document Cross-Motion to Dismiss Complaint, Document No. 70. This case is not ECF. (KA) (Entered: 06/02/2008)
06/02/2008   ***NOTE TO ATTORNEY TO RE-FILE DOCUMENT - NON-ECF CASE ERROR. Note to Attorney Richard M. Howard to MANUALLY RE-FILE Document Affidavit in Support of Motion, Document No. 71. This case is not ECF. (KA) (Entered: 06/02/2008)
06/02/2008   ***NOTE TO ATTORNEY TO RE-FILE DOCUMENT - NON-ECF CASE ERROR. Note to Attorney Richard M. Howard to MANUALLY RE-FILE Document Affidavit of Service, Document No. 72. This case is not ECF. (KA) (Entered: 06/02/2008)
06/03/2008 NOT DOCKETED 20080603 Anker Foley Rule 26 Response
06/03/2008 83 CROSS-MOTION to Dismiss plaintiffs' complaint purs to FRCP Rule 12(b)(6). Attached is Affidavit. Document filed by Meltzer Lippe Goldstein & Breistone LLP, Lewis S. Meltzer. (djc) Modified on 6/5/2008 (djc). (Entered: 06/05/2008)
06/06/2008 NOT DOCKETED Court return of Motion to Dismiss Response filed in error supposedly
06/06/2008 85

Note out of order

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO MOTIONS TO DISMISS DUE TO EXTRANEOUS CIRCUMSTANCES AND POSSIBLE ABUSE OF PROCESS AND REQUESTS COURT TO REVISIT PRO BONO COUNSEL. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually), P. Stephen Lamont. (pl) (Entered: 06/11/2008)
06/09/2008 84

WRONG CASE

Note out of order and not part of this case but related Esposito case

DECLARATION OF SERVICE of Motion to dismiss dated 5/30/08, the Declaration of Monica A. Connell and State Defendants Memorandum in support of Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint served on Pro Se Plaintiff, Attorneys for Harvey Gladstein & Partners, Attorneys for Alan Isaac, and Attorneys for the City defendants on 5/30/08. Service was made by Federal Express. [this looks like entry from a related case but the following text is from this case and Hoffman is not involved in other case???] Document filed by Lorraine Christine Hoffman (in her individual capacity). (pl) Modified on 6/10/2008 (pl). (Entered: 06/10/2008)
06/16/2008 WRONG CASE, ENTERS MY CASE INFO INTO ANDERSON DOCKET Anderson Docket with Eliot as Plaintiff????
06/18/2008  86 ORDER: Plaintiff's moved (doc. #85), for an extension of time to respond to the Motions to Dismiss. Plaintiffs responses due 7/14/08. Defendants replies due 7/28/08. NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS WILL BE GRANTED. Set Deadlines/Hearing as to 73 MOTION to Dismiss. 83 MOTION to Dismiss. 68 MOTION to Dismiss. 78 MOTION to Dismiss. 75 MOTION to Dismiss. 81 MOTION to Dismiss. 66 MOTION to Dismiss: (Responses due by 7/14/2008, Replies due by 7/28/2008.) (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 6/17/07) (db) (Entered: 06/18/2008)
07/03/2008  88 MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Amended Complaint served. Thomas Hall (in his individual capacity) served on 6/6/2008, answer due 6/26/2008. Service was accepted by Vickie Vanlith, Administrative Assistant. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually). (pl) (Entered: 07/07/2008)
07/07/2008 89 MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Amended Complaint served. The Florida Bar served on 6/6/2008, answer due 6/26/2008. Service was accepted by Jack Harkness-Executive Director. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually). (pl) (Entered: 07/07/2008)
07/14/2008 NOT DOCKETED Letter to Judge Scheindlin Regarding Emergency Situation
07/14/2008 90 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE to Motion re: 83 MOTION to Dismiss. Document filed by P. Stephen Lamont. (djc) (Entered: 07/15/2008)
07/14/2008 91 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE to Motion re: 75 MOTION to Dismiss. Document filed by P. Stephen Lamont. (djc) (Entered: 07/15/2008)
07/14/2008 92 Co-Plaintiff Lamont's Opposition to the Sate Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. (djc) (Entered: 07/15/2008)
07/14/2008 93 opposition/RESPONSE to Motion re: 78 MOTION to Dismiss.. Document filed by P. Stephen Lamont. (djc) (Entered: 07/15/2008)
07/14/2008 94 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE to Motion re: 81 MOTION to Dismiss.. Document filed by P. Stephen Lamont. (djc) (Entered: 07/15/2008)
07/14/2008 95 RESPONSE to Motion re: 12 MOTION to Dismiss. Document filed by P. Stephen Lamont. (djc) (Entered: 07/15/2008)
07/14/2008 96 OPPOSITION RESPONSE to Motion re: 66 MOTION to Dismiss.. Document filed by P. Stephen Lamont. (djc) (Entered: 07/15/2008)
07/15/2008 97 MOTION for Extension of Time To File Responsive Pleadings to Motions to Dismiss & Opposition to Motions to Dismiss; attached are papers in support. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually).(cd) (Entered: 07/17/2008)
07/17/2008 98 ORDER: It is hereby stipulated and agreed that the Clerk's Certificate obtained by plaintiff is vacated. (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 7/17/2008) (jpo) (Entered: 07/17/2008)
07/16/2008 99  MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Amended Complaint, served. Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee served on 6/19/2008, answer due 7/9/2008. Service was accepted by Tom McGowan. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein; P. Stephen Lamont. (jpo) (Entered: 07/21/2008)
07/16/2008 100 MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Amended Complaint served. Meltzer Lippe Goldstein & Breistone LLP served on 6/19/2008, answer due 7/9/2008. Service was accepted by Tom McGowan. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein. (tro) (Entered: 07/21/2008)
07/18/2008 NOT DOCKETED FINAL SIGNED Opposition to Proskauer latter dated July 17 2008
07/24/2008 101 REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW ON BEHALF of Defendants Lewis and MLGB Document filed by Meltzer Lippe Goldstein & Breistone LLP, Lewis S. Meltzer. (djc) (Entered: 07/25/2008)
07/28/2008 102 REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 75 MOTION to Dismiss.. Document filed by Raymond A. Joao. (pl) (Entered: 07/29/2008)
07/28/2008 103 REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 81 MOTION to Dismiss.. Document filed by Foley Lardner LLP, Michael C. Grebe, William J. Dick, Douglas A. Boehm, Steven C. Becker. (pl) (Entered: 07/29/2008)
07/28/2008 104   SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION of Joanna Smith in Support re: 78 MOTION to Dismiss. Document filed by Steven C. Krane (in his official capacity), Kenneth Rubenstein. (pl) (Entered: 07/29/2008)
07/28/2008 105 REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 78 MOTION to Dismiss.. Document filed by Steven C. Krane (in his official capacity), Kenneth Rubenstein. (pl) (Entered: 07/29/2008)
08/01/2008 106 ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Judge Schira A. Scheindlin from P. Stephen Lamont dated 7/29/08 re: Request for leave to file a sur reply. ENDORSEMENT: Plaintiff's request to file a sur-reply is denied. (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 8/1/08) (cd) (Entered: 08/04/2008)
08/08/2008 107 OPINION AND ORDER that for the reasons stated above, defendants' motions to dismiss are granted. The remaining defendants are dismissed sua sponte. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close these and related motions (documents no. 12,47,48,65,66,68,73,75,78,81,83, and 97 on the docket sheet) and this case re: 75 MOTION to Dismiss, filed by Raymond A. Joao, 47 MOTION to Amend/Correct 1 Complaint, filed by Eliot I. Bernstein, 66 MOTION to Dismiss, filed by Andrew H. Goodman, Virginia State Bar, Noel Sengel, Mary W. Martelino, 83 MOTION to Dismiss, filed by Meltzer Lippe Goldstein & Breistone LLP, Lewis S. Meltzer, 68 MOTION to Dismiss, filed by Eric Turner, Lorraine Christine Hoffman, Kenneth Marvin, John Anthony Boggs, 48 MOTION in Opposition to Defendants Motionto Dismiss Based on Material and Substantial Evidence re: 12 MOTION to Dismiss, filed by Eliot I. Bernstein, 97 MOTION for Extension of Time, filed by Eliot I. Bernstein, 73 MOTION to Dismiss, filed by State of New York Commission of Investigation, 81 MOTION to Dismiss, filed by Michael C. Grebe, Foley Lardner LLP, William J. Dick, Douglas A. Boehm, Steven C. Becker, 12 MOTION to Dismiss, filed by Eric Turner, Lorraine Christine Hoffman, Kenneth Marvin, John Anthony Boggs, The Florida Bar, 65 MOTION re: 60 Order, filed by P. Stephen Lamont, Eliot I. Bernstein, 78 MOTION to Dismiss, filed by Proskauer Rose LLP, Kenneth Rubenstein, Estate of Stephen Kaye, Steven C. Krane. (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 8/8/08) Copies sent by chambers.(cd) (Entered: 08/11/2008)
08/08/2008   Transmission to Judgments and Orders Clerk. Transmitted re: 107 Memorandum & Opinion, to the Judgments and Orders Clerk. (cd) (Entered: 08/11/2008)
08/08/2008   SCHEINDLIN DISMISSAL OF 6 RELATED CASES TO ANDERSON
08/08/2008  

Transmission to Judgments and Orders Clerk. Transmitted re: 107 Memorandum & Opinion, to the Judgments and Orders Clerk. (cd) (Entered: 08/11/2008)

08/19/2008 108

ORDER: Plaintiffs move for reconsideration of the Opinion and Order dated 8/8/08, in which this Court granted certain defendants' motions to dismiss and dismissed all other defendants sua sponte. The federal courts are simply not the appropriate forum for plaintiffs to seek redress of these grievances. Plaintiffs have not identified any material facts or law overlooked by the Court. Reconsideration is there denied. (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 8/19/08) (tro) (Entered: 08/19/2008)

08/19/2008 109

MOTION for Reconsideration and Modification of the Court's August 8,2008 re; 107 Memorandum & Opinion. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually), Eliot I. Bernstein. (jmi) (Entered: 09/11/2008)

09/04/2008 112

NOTICE OF APPEAL from 107 Memorandum & Opinion. Document filed by P. Stephen Lamont. Filing fee $ 455.00, receipt number E 662193. Copies mailed to attorney(s) of record: Attorney General, NYS. (tp) (Entered: 09/30/2008)

09/05/2008 111

NOTICE OF APPEAL from 107 Memorandum & Opinion. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein. Copies mailed to attorney(s) of record: Attorney General, NYS. (tp) (Entered: 09/30/2008)

Notice of Appeal & Extension of Time

Motion for Extension to File Appeal

09/05/2008  

Appeal Remark as to 111 Notice of Appeal filed by Eliot I. Bernstein. $455.00 APPEAL FEE DUE. (tp) (Entered: 09/30/2008)

09/23/2008 110

MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Amended Complaint served. Eric Turner (in his official capacity) served on 8/13/2008, answer due 9/2/2008; Eric Turner (in his individual capacity) served on 8/13/2008, answer due 9/2/2008. Service was made by MAIL. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein. (js) (Entered: 09/24/2008)

09/30/2008  

Transmission of Notice of Appeal and Certified Copy of Docket Sheet to US Court of Appeals re: 111 Notice of Appeal. (tp) (Entered: 09/30/2008)

09/30/2008  

Transmission of Notice of Appeal to the District Judge re: 111 Notice of Appeal. (tp) (Entered: 09/30/2008)

09/30/2008  

Transmission of Notice of Appeal to the District Judge re: 111 Notice of Appeal. (tp) (Entered: 09/30/2008)

09/30/2008  

Transmission of Notice of Appeal to the District Judge re: 112 Notice of Appeal. (tp) (Entered: 09/30/2008)

10/02/2008 113

Appeal Record Sent to USCA (Index). Notice that the Original index to the record on Appeal for 111 Notice of Appeal filed by Eliot I. Bernstein 3 Copies of the index, Certified Clerk Certificate and Certified Docket Sheet were transmitted to the U.S. Court of Appeals. (nd) (tp). (Entered: 10/02/2008)

10/02/2008  

Appeal Record Sent to USCA (File). Indexed record on Appeal Files for 111 Notice of Appeal filed by Eliot I. Bernstein were transmitted to the U.S. Court of Appeals. (Total of 4 volumes sent to USCA on 10/3/2008). (nd) (Entered: 10/02/2008)

10/02/2008 114

Appeal Record Sent to USCA (Index). Notice that the Original index to the record on Appeal for 112 Notice of Appeal filed by P. Stephen Lamont 3 Copies of the index, Certified Clerk Certificate and Certified Docket Sheet were transmitted to the U.S. Court of Appeals. (nd) (tp). (Entered: 10/02/2008)

10/02/2008  

Appeal Record Sent to USCA (File). Indexed record on Appeal Files for 112 Notice of Appeal filed by P. Stephen Lamont were transmitted to the U.S. Court of Appeals. (nd) (Entered: 10/02/2008)

10/08/2008  

USCA Case Number 08-4873-cv from the US Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit assigned to 112 Notice of Appeal filed by P. Stephen Lamont. (nd) (Entered: 10/08/2008)

     
     DOCUMENTS FILED BUT NOT YET ON COURT DOCKET
1/25/2008   Court Memorandum to Serve 2 Copies of Complaint as Courtesy to the Attorney General [Andrew Cuomo]
2/19/2008   RE: MISSING COMPLAINTS TO US MARSHALL FOR SERVICE IN CASE

07 CIV. 11196 (SAS) ELIOT I. BERNSTEIN, ET AL. V. APPELLATE DIVISION FIRST DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENTAL DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE, ET AL.

3/5/2008 Not Docketed Re: Plaintiffs Opposition to State Defendants Letter of February 29, 2008 in Eliot I. Bernstein, et al. v. Appellate Division, First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee, et al.,
Docket No. 07 CV 11196 (SAS)
3/5/2008 Not Docketed and Perhaps Skipped Re: Plaintiffs Opposition to Proskauer Rose March 4, 2008 to this Court in Eliot I. Bernstein, et al. v. Appellate Division, First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee, et al.,
Docket No. 07 CV 11196 (SAS)
3/10/2008   New First Department Attorney Ethics Complaints filed against Proskauer Rose, LLP, Foley and Lardner, Gregg M. Mashberg of Proskauer, Joanna F. Smith of Proskauer, Todd C. Norbitz of Foley and Lardner and Anne B. Sekel of Foley and Lardner.
3/13/2008 Not Docketed Re: Plaintiffs Opposition to Court Order dated March 7, 2008 in Eliot I. Bernstein, et al. v. Appellate Division, First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee, et al.,
Docket No. 07 CV 11196 (SAS)
3/14/2008   Letter to New York Attorney General to reinvestigate prior Iviewit complaints against public office corruption based on the new information in Anderson
4/1/2008   Motion in Opposition to Florida Bar Motion to Dismiss Part 1 - Conflicts
4/7/2008   Motion in Opposition to Florida Bar Motion to Dismiss Part 2
4/7/2008   Motion to allow for filing Amended Complaint
9/24/2007   Letter from New York Attorney General denying investigation of public officials at First Department
10/06/2008   Cahill Complaint First Department Reardon Response
     
     

 


General Docket
US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
                   Second  Circuit Court of
                            Appeals

                                                       INDIV

                                                       OPEN

Court of Appeals Docket #:       08-4873-cv
Nsuit :  3470              STATUTES-RICOH

Bernstein v. Appellate Division First              Filed   10/3/08
Department Disciplinary Committee

Appeal     SDNY (NEW YORK CITY)
from:

Case type information:

      Civil

      Private

      None

Lower court information:

    District:      07-cv-11196

    Trial Judge:   Shira A. Scheindlin

    MagJudge:

    Date Filed:      12/12/07

    Date order/judgement:     8/8/2008

    Date NOA filed:  9/5/2008

Fee status: Paid

Panel Assignment:

Panel:

Date of decision:

Prior cases:  NONE

Current cases NONE

Official Caption 1/
                                                       INDIV

                                                       OPEN

--------------------------------------
Docket No. [s] : 08-4873 -cv

Eliot I. Bernstein, individually,  P. Stephen Lamont, on
behalf of Shareholders of Iviweit Holdings, Inc.,
Iviewit Technologies, Inc., Uview.com, Inc., Iviewit.com,
 Inc., I.C., Inc., Iviewit.com LLC, Iviewit LLC, Iviewit
Corporation, Iviewit, Inc., and Patent Interest Holders,


	Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

Appellate Division First Department Departmental,
Thomas J. Cahill, in his official capacity, in his
individual capacity,  Joseph  Wigely, in his official
capacity, in his individual capacity,  Catherine O`Hagan
Wolfe, in their officical capacity, in their individual
capacity,  Paul  Curran, in their official capacity, in
thier individual capacity,  Martin R. Gold, in his
individual capacity, in their official capacity,  Angela
M Mazzarelli, in her official capacity, in their oficial
capacity,  Richard T. Andrias, in his official capacity,
in their official capacity,  David B. Saxe, in his
official capacity, in their individual capacity,  David
Friedman, in his official capacity, in their individual
capacity,  Luis A. Gonzales, in his official capacity,
in their individual capacity,  Appellate Division Second
Department Departmenta,  Lawrence F. DiGiovanna, in his
official capacity, in their individual capacity,  Diana
Maxfield Kearse, in his official capacity, in their
individual capacity,  James E. Peltzer, in his official
capacity, in their individual capacity,  A. Gail
Prudenti, in his official capacity, in their individual
capacity,  Steven C. Krane, in his official capacity, in
their individual capacity,  Hon. Judith S. Kaye, in his
official capacity, in their individual capacity,
Kenneth  Rubenstein,  Estate of Stephen Kaye,  Proskauer
Rose LLP,  Meltzer Lippe Goldstein & Breistone LLP,
Lewis S. Meltzer,  Raymond A. Joao,  Foley Lardner LLP,
Michael C. Grebe,  William J. Dick,  Douglas A. Boehm,
Steven C. Becker,  State of New York Commission of
Investigation,  Lawyers Fund for Client Protection of
the State,  The Florida Bar,  Lorraine Christine Hoffman,
 in her official capacity, in her individual capacity,
Eric  Turner, in her official capacity, in her
individual capacity,  John Anthony Boggs, in her
official capacity, in her individual capacity,  Kenneth
Marvin, in her official capacity, in her individual
capacity,  Thomas  Hall, in her official capacity, in
her individual capacity,  Deborah  Yarborough,  Virginia
State Bar,  Andrew H. Goodman, in his officail capacity,
in his individual capacity,  Noel  Sengel, in his
officail capacity, in his individual capacity,  Mary W.
Martelino, in her individual capacity,  John  Does,

	Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------------------------



Authorized Abbreviated Caption 2/
--------------------------------------
Docket No. [s] : 08-4873 -cv

Bernstein  v.  Appellate Division First Department
Disciplinary Committee

Docket as of   February 06, 2009  3:05 am              Page   2

                                                       INDIV

                                                       OPEN

--------------------------------------



---------------------------------------------------------
-----------------
1/ Fed. R. App. P. Rule 12 [a] and 32 [a].
2/ For use on correspondence and motions only.

Docket as of   February 06, 2009  3:05 am              Page   3

                                                       INDIV

                                                       OPEN

Deborah  Yarborough

Defendant-Appellee

John  Does

Defendant-Appellee

The Florida Bar

Defendant-Appellee

Thomas  Hall

Defendant-Appellee

Eliot I. Bernstein             Eliot I. Bernstein

Plaintiff-Appellant            n/a

                               2753 Northwest 34th Street
                               Boca Raton , FL , 33434

                               561-245-8588

Docket as of   February 06, 2009  3:05 am              Page   4

                                                       INDIV

                                                       OPEN

Estate of Stephen Kaye         Joanna Frances Smith Esq.

Defendant-Appellee             [ LD n ]
                               Proskauer Rose LLP

                               1585 Broadway
                               New York , NY , 10036

                               212-969-3437

Kenneth  Rubenstein            Joanna Frances Smith Esq.(See
                               above)
Defendant-Appellee             [ LD n ]

Proskauer Rose LLP             Joanna Frances Smith Esq.(See
                               above)
Defendant-Appellee             [ LD n ]

Steven C. Krane                Joanna Frances Smith Esq.(See
                               above)
Defendant-Appellee             [ LD n ]

Raymond A. Joao                John W. Fried Esq.

Defendant-Appellee             [ LD n ]
                               Fried & Epstein  LLP

                               1350 Broadway
                               New York , NY , 10018

                               212-268-7111

Docket as of   February 06, 2009  3:05 am              Page   5

                                                       INDIV

                                                       OPEN

Douglas A. Boehm               Kent K. Anker Esq.

Defendant-Appellee             [ LD n ]
                               Friedman Kaplan Seiler &
                               Adelman LLP
                               1633 Broadway
                               New York  , NY , 10019

                               212-833-1100

Foley Lardner LLP              Kent K. Anker Esq.(See above)

Defendant-Appellee             [ LD n ]

Michael C. Grebe               Kent K. Anker Esq.(See above)

Defendant-Appellee             [ LD n ]

Steven C. Becker               Kent K. Anker Esq.(See above)

Defendant-Appellee             [ LD n ]

William J. Dick                Kent K. Anker Esq.(See above)

Defendant-Appellee             [ LD n ]

A. Gail Prudenti               Monica Anne Connell Esq.

Docket as of   February 06, 2009  3:05 am              Page   6

                                                       INDIV

                                                       OPEN

Defendant-Appellee             [ LD n ]
                               Attorney General of the State
                               of New York
                               120 Broadway
                               New York , NY , 10271

                               212-416-8965

Andrew H. Goodman              Monica Anne Connell Esq.(See
                               above)
Defendant-Appellee             [ LD n ]

Angela M Mazzarelli            Monica Anne Connell Esq.(See
                               above)
Defendant-Appellee             [ LD n ]

Appellate Division First       Monica Anne Connell Esq.(See
Department Departmental        above)
Defendant-Appellee             [ LD n ]

Appellate Division Second      Monica Anne Connell Esq.(See
Department Departmental        above)
Defendant-Appellee             [ LD n ]

Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe        Monica Anne Connell Esq.(See
                               above)
Defendant-Appellee             [ LD n ]

David  Friedman                Monica Anne Connell Esq.(See
                               above)
Defendant-Appellee             [ LD n ]

Docket as of   February 06, 2009  3:05 am              Page   7

                                                       INDIV

                                                       OPEN

David B. Saxe                  Monica Anne Connell Esq.(See
                               above)
Defendant-Appellee             [ LD n ]

Diana  Maxfield Kearse         Monica Anne Connell Esq.(See
                               above)
Defendant-Appellee             [ LD n ]

Eric  Turner                   Monica Anne Connell Esq.(See
                               above)
Defendant-Appellee             [ LD n ]

Hon. Judith S. Kaye            Monica Anne Connell Esq.(See
                               above)
Defendant-Appellee             [ LD n ]

James E. Peltzer               Monica Anne Connell Esq.(See
                               above)
Defendant-Appellee             [ LD n ]

John Anthony Boggs             Monica Anne Connell Esq.(See
                               above)
Defendant-Appellee             [ LD n ]

Docket as of   February 06, 2009  3:05 am              Page   8

                                                       INDIV

                                                       OPEN

Joseph  Wigely                 Monica Anne Connell Esq.(See
                               above)
Defendant-Appellee             [ LD n ]

Kenneth  Marvin                Monica Anne Connell Esq.(See
                               above)
Defendant-Appellee             [ LD n ]

Lawrence F. DiGiovanna         Monica Anne Connell Esq.(See
                               above)
Defendant-Appellee             [ LD n ]

Lawyers Fund for Client        Monica Anne Connell Esq.(See
Protection of the State of     above)
Defendant-Appellee             [ LD n ]

Lorraine Christine Hoffman     Monica Anne Connell Esq.(See
                               above)
Defendant-Appellee             [ LD n ]

Luis A. Gonzales               Monica Anne Connell Esq.(See
                               above)
Defendant-Appellee             [ LD n ]

Martin R. Gold                 Monica Anne Connell Esq.(See
                               above)
Defendant-Appellee             [ LD n ]

Docket as of   February 06, 2009  3:05 am              Page   9

                                                       INDIV

                                                       OPEN

Mary W. Martelino              Monica Anne Connell Esq.(See
                               above)
Defendant-Appellee             [ LD n ]

Noel  Sengel                   Monica Anne Connell Esq.(See
                               above)
Defendant-Appellee             [ LD n ]

Paul  Curran                   Monica Anne Connell Esq.(See
                               above)
Defendant-Appellee             [ LD n ]

Richard T. Andrias             Monica Anne Connell Esq.(See
                               above)
Defendant-Appellee             [ LD n ]

State of New York Commission   Monica Anne Connell Esq.(See
of Investigation               above)
Defendant-Appellee             [ LD n ]

Thomas J. Cahill               Monica Anne Connell Esq.(See
                               above)
Defendant-Appellee             [ LD n ]

Virginia State Bar             Monica Anne Connell Esq.(See

Docket as of   February 06, 2009  3:05 am              Page  10

                                                       INDIV

                                                       OPEN

                               above)
Defendant-Appellee             [ LD n ]

P. Stephen Lamont              P. Stephen Lamont

Plaintiff-Appellant            n/a

                               35 Locust Avenue
                               Rye , NY , 10580

                               914-217-0038

Appellate Division First       Patrick J. Walsh Esq.
Department Departmental
Defendant-Appellee             [ n ]
                               U.S. Attorney Generals Office,
                               State of New York
                               120 Broadway
                               New York  , NY ,  10007

                               212-416-6197

Lewis S. Meltzer               Richard M. Howard Esq.

Defendant-Appellee             [ LD n ]
                               Law Offices of Richard M. Howard

                               190 Willis Avenue
                               Mineola , NY , 11501

                               516-747-0300

Meltzer Lippe Goldstein &      Richard M. Howard Esq.(See
Breistone LLP                  above)
Defendant-Appellee             [ LD n ]

Docket as of   February 06, 2009  3:05 am              Page  11

                                                       INDIV

                                                       OPEN

Docket as of   February 06, 2009  3:05 am              Page  12

                                                       INDIV

                                                       OPEN

   10/3/08  APPELLANT   Eliot Bernstein,  P. Lamont,
            Copy of notice of appeal and district court
            docket entries on behalf of  APPELLANT
            Eliot Bernstein,  P. Lamont,  filed.
            [Entry date Oct  6 2008  ]  [AJ]

   10/3/08  Note: This appeal was PRO SE when filed.
            [Entry date Oct  6 2008  ]  [AJ]

   10/3/08  Copy of receipt re: payment of docketing fee
            filed on behalf of  APPELLANT   Eliot
            Bernstein,  P. Lamont,  .RECEIPT #662193
            [Entry date Oct  6 2008  ]  [AJ]

   10/3/08  Copy of district court order dated 08/08/08
            RECEIVED.   [Entry date Oct  6 2008  ]  [AJ]

   10/3/08  Record on appeal filed. (Original papers of
            district court.)  Volume(4)    [Entry date
            Oct  6 2008  ]  [AJ]

   10/6/08  Instructional Forms sent to Pro Se litigant
             [Entry date Oct  6 2008  ]  [AJ]
10/6/08		Acknowledgement of Appeal Lamont
10/6/08		Docketing Letter_2nd Circuit Lamont- Missing Pages

   10/8/08  Record on appeal received in records room
            from team (4 vols).   [Entry date Oct  8
            2008  ]  [RW]

  10/14/08  Notice of appeal acknowledgment letter from
            P. Lamont received.   [Entry date Oct 16
            2008  ]  [AJ]

  10/15/08  Scheduling order #1 filed. Appellants brief
            due  11/17/2008. Appellees brief due
            12/17/2008. Ready week  2/2/2009.   [Entry
            date Oct 15 2008  ]  [AJ]

  10/15/08  Notice to counsel and pro se: scheduling
            order #1   [Entry date Oct 15 2008  ]  [AJ]

  10/16/08  The new case manager assigned to this case
            is: Holmes, Deborah.   [Entry date Oct 16
            2008  ]  [JM]

  10/23/08  APPELLANT   Eliot Bernstein,  motion
            received.    [Entry date Oct 23 2008  ]  [DH]

Docket as of   February 06, 2009  3:05 am              Page  13

                                                       INDIV

                                                       OPEN

  10/23/08  Appellant  Eliot Bernstein motion for a 60 -
            90 day extension of time to file briefs,
            filed with proof of service.   [Entry date
            Nov 19 2008  ]  [DH]

  11/17/08  Notice of Appearance Filed by   P. Lamont on
            behalf of P. Stephen Lamont (Orig in acco,
            copy to Calendar and Admissions Dept.).
            [Entry date Nov 18 2008  ]  [DH]

  11/17/08  APPELLANT   P. Lamont,  brief and joint
            appendix with proof of service filed.
            [Entry date Nov 18 2008  ]  [DH]

  11/19/08  Copy of Appellant`s Motion for an extension
            of time served on Appellee`s by Case Manager.
               [Entry date Nov 19 2008  ]  [DH]
11/20/08	Court of Appeal Extension Letter, Not Docketed
  11/24/08  Notice to parties regarding court order
            dated 11/24/08   [Entry date Nov 24 2008  ]
            [AS]

  11/24/08  Order FILED GRANTING motion extended time by
            Appellant  Eliot Bernstein, endorsed on
            motion dated 10/23/2008. IT IS HEREBY
            ORDERED that Appellant`s motion an extension
            of time is GRANTED.Appellant`s brief and
            appendix shall be filed on or before
            February 17, 2009. No further extensions of
            time is GRANTED . Appellee`s brief is due on
            or before March 19, 2009. The appeal shall
            be heard no earlier than the week of April 4,
             2009 Before on  RKW. Endorsed by JP
            Administrative Attorney   [Entry date Nov 24
            2008  ]  [AS]

  11/25/08  Papers <Notice of Receipt of Appellant's
            Motion > from Kent K. Anker, received.
            [Entry date Dec  2 2008  ]  [DH]

   12/3/08  Letter dated December 2, 2008 from Attorney
            Gregg M. Mashberg regarding briefing
            schedule for appellee's, received.  (All
            Appellee's briefs are due as scheduled March
            19, 2009).   [Entry date Dec  4 2008  ]  [DH]

   12/3/08  Letter dated December 3, 2008 from Stephan M.
             Hall, Assistant Attorney General, who will
            be representing the Virginia State Bar
            Employees, received.   [Entry date Dec  5
            2008  ]  [DH]

  12/17/08  Motion for  admission pro hac vice (Stephen
            M. Hall), filed with proof of service.
            [Entry date Dec 18 2008  ]  [DH]

  12/19/08  Notice to counsel/pro se re:  Motion Order
            dated 12/19/08.   [Entry date Dec 19 2008  ]
             [DH]

Docket as of   February 06, 2009  3:05 am              Page  14

                                                       INDIV

                                                       OPEN

  12/19/08  Order FILED GRANTING motion for admission
            pro hac vice by  endorsed on motion dated
            12/17/2008.  IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the
            motion is GRANTED.  Attorney Hall is
            admitted pro hac vice.  Endorsed for the
            Court by JP, Motions Staff Attorney.
            [Entry date Dec 19 2008  ]  [DH]

  12/31/08  Letter dated December 5, 2008 from Attorney
            John W. Fried, informing the Court of his
            change of address, received.   [Entry date
            Dec 31 2008  ]  [DH]

  12/31/08  Request for address change for  John W.
            Fried, Esq. new address:  Fried & Epstein
            LLP, Empire State Building, 350 Fifth Avenue,
             Ste. 7612, New York, NY 10018..

               [Entry date Dec 31 2008  ]  [DH]
12/31/08  Letter dated December 5, 2008 from Attorney
            John W. Fried, informing the Court of his
            change of address, received.   [Entry date
            Dec 31 2008  ]  [DH]
  12/31/08  Request for address change for  John W.
            Fried, Esq. new address:  Fried & Epstein
            LLP, Empire State Building, 350 Fifth Avenue,
             Ste. 7612, New York, NY 10018..
               [Entry date Dec 31 2008  ]  [DH]
12/31/08	US Court of Appeals Docs and Docket Report
   1/30/09  Appellant  Eliot Bernstein motion for
            "extension of time to file briefs, stay of
            the appeal, conflicts, docketing and other
            errors and other requests," filed with proof
            of service.   [Entry date Jan 30 2009  ]
            [DH]
   1/30/09  Appellant  Eliot Bernstein motion for stay
            of appeal, conflicts, dockting and other
            erors and requests,  filed with proof of
            service.   [Entry date Feb 18 2009  ]  [DH]
    2/6/09  Notice to counsel/pro se re:  Motion Order
            dated 2/6/09.   [Entry date Feb  6 2009  ]
            [DH]
    2/6/09  Order FILED DENYING motion for an extension
            of  time and to stay the appeal by Appellant
             Eliot Bernstein, endorsed on motion dated
            1/30/2009.  IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the
            motion by pro se Appellant for a fifteen to
            eighteen month extension of time to file
            brief or a stay of the appeal is DENIED.
            Before:  RKW, CJ.  Endorsed for the Court by
            JF, Administrative Attorney.   [Entry date
            Feb  6 2009  ]  [DH]
   2/10/09  Appellant P. Stephen Lamont papers in
            opposition to motion to Appellant's
            Bernsteins extension fo  time filed with
            proof of service.   [Entry date Feb 13 2009
            ]  [DH]
   2/13/09  Letter/motion dated February 13, 2009 via
            fax from appellant requesting a temporary
            stay of the submission  until the White
            House and Oval Office the United States
            Attorney General and other Necessary parties
            can be heard by conference call, received.
            [Entry date Feb 13 2009  ]  [DH]
   2/17/09  Letter dated February 16, 2009 from
            appellant regarding his temporary stay sent
            via fax, received.   [Entry date Feb 17 2009
Docket as of   February 28, 2009  2:33 am              Page  15
                                                       INDIV
                                                       OPEN
             ]  [DH]
02/17/09	Second Circuit Holmes request for stay to file appeal and confirmation deliveries low
   2/17/09  Letter dated February 17, 2009 via fax from
            Appellant Bernstein, received.   [Entry date
            Feb 24 2009  ]  [DH]
   2/18/09  Notice to counsel/pro se re:  Motion Order
            dated 2/18/09.   [Entry date Feb 18 2009  ]
            [DH]
   2/18/09  Order FILED REFERRING motion to stay the
            appeal, conflicts, docketing and other
            errors and requests  by Appellant  Eliot
            Bernstein, endorsed on motion dated
            1/30/2009.  This motion other than the
            extension request, is sent to the panel that
            will hear the apeal.  Endorsed for the Court
            by CJM, Sup, Staff Attorney.   [Entry date
            Feb 18 2009  ]  [DH]
   2/19/09  Order filed stating, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED
            that pro se Appellant's motion for
            reconsideration of the order denying a
            fifteen to eighteen month extension of time
            to file brief or stay of the appeal is
            DENIED.  However, Appellant is accorded a
            grace period until February 27, 2009.  If a
            brief is not filed by that date, the Clerk's
            Office is instructed to dismiss the appeal
            without further notice from the court.
            Appellant is advised that a motion seeking
            reconsideration or other relief from this
            order does not stay the due date.
            Appellee's brief is due on or before March
            30, 2009.  The appeal shall be heard no
            earlier than the week of May 18, 2009.
            Before:  RKW, CJ.  Endorsed for the Court by
            JF, Administrative Attorney.   [Entry date
            Feb 19 2009  ]  [DH]
   2/19/09  Notice to counsel/pro se re:  Order dated
            2/19/08.   [Entry date Feb 19 2009  ]  [DH]
   2/19/09  Scheduling order #2 filed. Appellants brief
            due  2/27/2009. Appellees brief due
            3/30/2009. Ready week  5/18/2009.   [Entry
            date Feb 19 2009  ]  [DH]
   2/19/09  Notice to counsel/pro se re:  Scheduling
            Order #2 dated 2/19/09.   [Entry date Feb 19
            2009  ]  [DH]
   2/19/09  Appellant P. Stephen Lamont papers in
            opposition to Appellant`s Eliot Bernstein's
            motions dated January 30, 2009,  filed with
            proof of service.   [Entry date Feb 20 2009
            ]  [DH]
   2/26/09  APPELLEE    Virginia State Bar,  Andrew
            Goodman,  Mary Martelino,  Noel Sengel,
            Lizbeth L. Miller, Commonwealth of Virginia
            (Virginia Defendants-Appellees), LETTER
            BRIEF filed with proof of service.   [Entry
            date Feb 27 2009  ]  [DH]
Docket as of   February 28, 2009  2:33 am              Page  17

   1/30/09  Appellant  Eliot Bernstein motion for
            "extension of time to file briefs, stay of
            the appeal, conflicts, docketing and other
            errors and other requests," filed with proof
            of service.   [Entry date Jan 30 2009  ]
            [DH]
20090227	Apellant Eliot Bernstein Brief
Docket as of   February 06, 2009  3:05 am              Page  15
Docket as of   March 13, 2009     3:57 am              Page  16

            (Virginia Defendants-Appellees), LETTER
            BRIEF filed with proof of service.   [Entry
            date Feb 27 2009  ]  [DH]

   2/27/09  APPELLANT   Eliot Bernstein,  brief RECEIVED.
                [Entry date Mar  4 2009  ]  [DH]

    3/2/09  APPELLANT   Eliot Bernstein,  motion
            received. Hard copies being forwarded by
            appellant.   [Entry date Mar  6 2009  ]  [DH]

    3/3/09  Notice of Appearance Filed by   Eliot
            Bernstein on behalf of himself. (Orig in
            acco, copy to Calendar and Admissions Dept.).
                [Entry date Mar  5 2009  ]  [DH]

    3/4/09  Notice of Appearance Filed by   Kent Anker
            on behalf of Foley & Lardner LLP, Steven C.
            Becker, Douglas A. Boehm, William J. Dick
            and Michael W. Grebe. (Orig in acco, copy to
            Calendar and Admissions Dept.).    [Entry
            date Mar  5 2009  ]  [DH]

    3/5/09  Notice of Appearance Filed by   Gregg
            Mashberg on behalf of Proskauer Rose LLP,
            Kenneth Rubenstein, Steven C. Krane and the
            Estate of Stephen Rackow Kaye. (Orig in acco,
             copy to Calendar and Admissions Dept.).
            [Entry date Mar  5 2009  ]  [DH]

    3/6/09  Appellant  Eliot Bernstein motion for
            Emergency investigation of Proskauer Rose
            Defendants involvement in the Allen Stanford
            financial...  filed with proof of service.
            [Entry date Mar  6 2009  ]  [DH]

    3/9/09  APPELLANT   Eliot Bernstein,  brief RECEIVED.
                [Entry date Mar 10 2009  ]  [DH]

    3/9/09  Appellee's papers in opposition to
            Appellant's motion for Emergency relief,
            filed with proof of service.   [Entry date
            Mar  9 2009  ]  [DH]

   3/10/09  APPELLANT   Eliot Bernstein,  defective
            filed. Notice sent to
             party to correct by 3/16/09.    [Entry date
            Mar 10 2009  ]  [DH]

   3/10/09  Instructional Forms sent to Pro Se litigant
             [Entry date Mar 10 2009  ]  [DH]

   3/10/09  Notice to counsel/pro se re:  Motion Order
            dated 3/10/09.   [Entry date Mar 10 2009  ]
            [DH]

   3/10/09  Order FILED DENYING motion for Emergency to
            investigate the involvement of Proskauer
            Rose by Appellant  Eliot Bernstein, endorsed
            on motion dated 3/6/2009.  IT IS HEREBY
            ORDERED that the emergency motion by pro se
            Appellant Bernstein to investigate the
            involvement of Proskauer Rose in recent
            financial scandals and for other relief is
            DENIED.  Before:  DAL, CJ.  Endorsed for the
            Court by JF, Administrative Attorney.
            [Entry date Mar 10 2009  ]  [DH]

   3/11/09  Notice of Appearance Filed by   John Fried
            on behalf of Raymond A. Joao. (Orig in acco,
            copy to Calendar and Admissions Dept.).
            [Entry date Mar 12 2009  ]  [DH]

Docket as of   March 13, 2009     3:57 am              Page  18

Denial of "extension of time to file briefs, stay of the appeal, conflicts, docketing and other errors and other requests," filed with proof of service.

February 13th 2009 Letter to President Barack Hussein Obama II to enjoin The Honorable Eric H. Holder Jr., United States Attorney General ~ Department of Justice

CASES SEEKING ASSOCIATION WITH ANDERSON CASE
(07cv09599) Anderson v The State of New York, et al.,
(07cv11196) Bernstein, et al. v Appellate Division First Department Disciplinary Committee, et al.,
(07cv11612) Esposito v The State of New York, et al.,
(08cv00526) Capogrosso v New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct, et al.,
(08cv02391) McKeown v The State of New York, et al.,
(08cv02852) Galison v The State of New York, et al.,
(08cv03305) Carvel v The State of New York, et al., and,
(08cv4053) Gizella Weisshaus v The State of New York, et al.
(08cv4438) Suzanne McCormick v The State of New York, et al.


OCTOBER 31, 2007 NEW YORK LAW JOURNAL EXPOSES CORRUPTION AT NEW YORK SUPREME COURT FIRST DEPARTMENT DISCIPLINARY - LAWSUIT CLAIMS IVIEWIT COMPLAINTS AND OTHERS AGAINST ATTORNEY'S AND MEMBERS OF THE FIRST DEPARTMENT WERE BURIED!!!

 

NEW YORK LAW JOURNAL

Complaints Against 'Select Attorneys' Whitewashed, N.Y. Lawsuit Alleges

Daniel Wise
New York Law Journal
10-30-2007
 

A former staff attorney at the 1st Department Disciplinary Committee has filed a federal lawsuit charging she was fired in June in retaliation for complaining that her superiors had engaged in a "pattern and practice of whitewashing and routinely dismissing complaints against certain select attorneys."

Christine C. Anderson, who had worked for six years at the disciplinary committee, seeks $10 million in damages, claiming retaliation for the exercise of her First Amendment rights and discrimination because she is of Jamaican origin and black.

Anderson also asks for the appointment of a federal monitor to oversee operation of the disciplinary committee.

David Bookstaver, a spokesman for the Office of Court Administration, said it would be "inappropriate" to comment on pending litigation.

Anderson alleged two instances in which her recommendations had been overridden or changed by her superiors at the committee.

In 2005, Anderson charged in her complaint, she discovered that the chief counsel of the disciplinary committee, Thomas J. Cahill, and Sherry K. Cohen, its first deputy counsel, were "apparently engaged in a 'numbers game' and practice" of "selectively" dismissing complaints against attorneys for their "own personal and political reasons."

A possible second, or alternative reason for the dismissals, the complaint stated, was that the prosecutions of the complaints would be "burdensome or otherwise 'unworthy' of prosecution."

Anderson also charged that in one incident, in July 2006, Cohen physically blocked her from leaving her office and, in so doing, had dug her nails into the plaintiff's hand, causing scratches.

Cahill declined to comment on the allegations; Cohen did not return a call for comment.

In addition to suing Cahill and Cohen, Anderson named as defendants Justice John T. Buckley, who was presiding justice of the Appellate Division, 1st Department, until May; former Clerk of Court Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe, who resigned in April to become clerk of the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals; and the Office of Court Administration.

The case, Anderson v. State of New York, was filed on Friday in the Southern District of New York, according to Anderson's attorney, Frederick K. Brewington of Hempstead, N.Y.

Cahill's retirement was announced in July, though he is remaining as chief counsel until a successor is chosen.

The first instance of a "whitewash" alleged in Anderson's complaint occurred "in or about 2003" in "a highly sensitive investigation," which had uncovered "overwhelming concrete evidence of misconduct" by an attorney, Anderson alleged.

The matter was dropped despite her recommendation that a formal complaint be filed against the lawyer, Anderson alleged.

She also charged that a large file she had amassed containing "indisputable evidence of misconduct" had been "gutted."

The second instance in which Anderson's handling of a case was overridden occurred about two years later, she alleged.

In that case, she stated, Cahill had asked her to write an introductory paragraph to the policy committee, explaining her recommendation that an attorney be given a non-public admonition rather than be the subject of a formal proceeding that could lead to a public sanction.

Anderson explained in her complaint, that, although the results of a "complex investigation" of the attorney "argued strongly in favor of charges," there was "lack of actual proof of a conversion." She also stated there had been an "initial lack of cooperation" from the client complaining against the lawyer.

Anderson stated that she wrote an introductory paragraph explaining the gravity of the attorney's conduct, but that Cohen had rewritten it, "deleting facts" Anderson had uncovered during her investigation and conclusions she had reached.

Anderson quoted Cohen as saying the reason she had rewritten the paragraph was to avoid having the policy committee send the matter back to staff for the preparation of a formal complaint.

Anderson further charged that Cohen had done this because "she had a prior working relationship" with the attorney for the lawyer under investigation and sought to avoid having his client formally charged "as a favor."

The complaint did not identify the two lawyers who were the subjects of the proceedings cited by Anderson. Brewington said in an interview that he would not name them "at this time."

 

 

--------------------------------------------

COURT OF APPEALS


NOVEMBER 1, 2007 ~ NEW YORK TIMES - EXPOSES CORRUPTION AT NEW YORK SUPREME COURT FIRST DEPARTMENT DISCIPLINARY, LAWSUIT FILED CLAIMS THOMAS CAHILL AND OTHERS BURIED COMPLAINTS AND CLAIMS IVIEWIT MATTERS WERE ALSO BURIED!!!

THE NEW YORK TIMES

November 1, 2007

Suit Accuses Court Panel of Cover-Up

Correction Appended

A former lawyer for the state court system, fired in June from her job investigating lawyers charged with misconduct, has charged in a federal lawsuit that supervisors “whitewashed” some cases for “personal or political reasons.”

The lawyer, Christine C. Anderson, who was a staff attorney for six years in a Departmental Disciplinary Committee of the State Supreme Court’s Appellate Division in Manhattan, did not name the lawyers who she said received such protection. But she said her supervisors, who were named, intervened on behalf of lawyers against whom she had found “overwhelming concrete evidence of misconduct.”

The lawsuit, filed last week in the United States District Court for the Southern District, charges that Ms. Anderson was fired because she openly voiced her concerns about “a pattern and practice of whitewashing and routinely dismissing complaints leveled against certain select attorneys.” Ms. Anderson, 62, who is black, also said she was a victim of age and race discrimination.

Disciplinary committees operate in each of the state’s four Appellate Division departments to investigate lawyers accused of misconduct. Charges can vary from unresponsiveness toward clients, to the theft of money from escrow accounts, to failure to disclose conflicts of interest. Based on investigations by staff attorneys like Ms. Anderson, committees can admonish lawyers, suspend or revoke their licenses or recommend criminal prosecution.

In the suit, Ms. Anderson, who worked in the First Department, covering the Bronx and Manhattan, named as defendants Thomas J. Cahill, chief counsel of the Departmental Disciplinary Committee; his first deputy, Sherry K. Cohen; Catherine O’Hagan Wolfe, the court clerk; David Spokiny, her deputy; and John Buckley, the presiding justice of the Office of Court Administration.

None could be reached for comment. David Bookstaver, a spokesman for the state court system, said it would be “inappropriate to comment.”

Fred K. Brewington, the Long Island lawyer representing Ms. Anderson, said she had been harassed on the job continuously, beginning in 2005, after she raised questions about Ms. Cohen’s relationship with a lawyer representing another lawyer who was under review. Despite strong evidence of misconduct by the lawyer in that case, he said, the complaint was dismissed and a file containing Ms. Anderson’s investigation disappeared.

Ms. Anderson is seeking $10 million in damages, as well as punitive damages and lawyer’s fees for what her suit described as the “irreparable injury,” “mental anguish and humiliation” of being fired without cause.

Correction: November 7, 2007

An article on Thursday about a lawsuit alleging that a former lawyer for the New York State court system was fired for accusing her superiors of unethical conduct misstated the jurisdiction of the First Department of the Appellate Division of State Supreme Court. It covers the Bronx and Manhattan, not “most of New York City and Westchester.”


http://rentamark.blog.com

Wednesday, January 16, 2008

AEAE HONORS Eliot I. Bernstein and P. Stephen Lamont

CHICAGO-- THE AMERICANS FOR THE ENFORCEMENT OF ATTORNEY ETHICS (AEAE) A CHICAGO BASED ATTORNEY ETHICS "WATCH DOG" GROUP THAT HAS FOR OVER 25 YEARS ADVOCATED THE STRICT ENFORCEMENT OF ATTORNEY ETHICS today honors Eliot I. Bernstein and P. Stephen Lamont. Bernstein and Lamont were not afraid to speak "truth to power" in the fine AEAE tradition. As a result of being victims of one of the grossest violation of the ethics laws for Intellectual Property ever committed by unethical lawyers and judges. It is alleged that attorneys positioned in key government posts, blocked the complaints filed against them, including the USPTO. Harry Moatz Director of the Office of Enrollment and Discipline it is alleged "suspended" IP investigations. Mr. Bernstein and Mr. Lamont has filed one of the "strongest" complaints that AEAE has ever seen in over 25 years against over 25 defendants, lawyers, judges, bar associations et al.,   The case # 1:2007cv11196 filed 12/12/2007 was listed as cause 1961 RICO cause of action filed in the Southern District of New York. See also www.iviewit.tv . Mr. Bernstein is the Founder & Inventor of Viewed Technologies, Inc..iviewit@iviewit.tv
http://www.livevideo.com/video/7237D54BB12B4D07A3DBEEED6E6953A5/iviewit-technologies-inventor-.aspx

LEO STOLLER ~ LEGAL ETHICS AND TRADEMARK EXPERT, DIRECTOR OF AMERICANS FOR THE ENFORCEMENT OF ATTORNEY ETHICS (AEAE)

Leo Stoller is a trademark expert, legal ethics Expert and an Expert on Constitutional law and Appellate Practice  http://www.intota.com/viewbio.asp?bioID=773998&perID=723536   who   is the National Director
of Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE)
a Chicago based group that has  advocated the "strict" enforcement of attorney ethics for over 25 years http://leostoller.wordpress.com/  AEAE "rates" attorneys nation wide.
 

 


Friday, January 11, 2008

NY Federal Judge: Ethics Scandal Cases Related

On Thursday, January 10, 2008, U.S. Federal District Court Judge Shira A. Scheindlin directed that the 1.5 Billion dollar Iviewit “patentgate” case, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York on December 12, 2007, be assigned to her court. 

Judge Scheindlin accepted the Iviewit lawsuit,
Bernstein v. Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee, as related to the pending New York attorney ethics scandal case, Anderson v. The State of New York

Allegations of covering-up and whitewashing complaints against favored attorneys find both cases seeking the appointment of a federal monitor to take over New York’s statewide attorney ethics committees.  A third lawsuit, filed December 28, 2007, is currently under review by Judge Scheindlin to be designated as an associated case in the state ethics scandal, Tammany Hall II. 

Federal Magistrate Judge Douglas F. Eaton has also been assigned to both the Anderson and Iviewit matters.
 
In another order, signed January 9, 2008, Judge Scheindlin directed U.S. Marshals to serve the Iviewit lawsuit on the listed defendants.

7 comments:

Anonymous said...
This should make the DDC and OCA sweat more than they have been...this is the big push needed for invasion into the operation of the NY STATE OFFICE OF COURT ADMINISTRATION and their operations for at least the past 17 yrs...the DE-KAYE reign! God, this is a blessing for all NY STATE TAXPAYERS AND VICTIMS OF THE FRAUDULENT CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR OF the most sacred of government entities in this country...the COURT SYSTEM!
Anonymous said...
I pray that you're right. The whole system has been Teflon coated for so long, most of us (read: victims) gave up hope a long time ago, and are waiting in the wings dreaming of vindication.

"Life being what it is, one dreams of revenge."
- Paul Gauguin
Anonymous said...
I'll believe it when i see it happen...These thugs are invincible, and very well protected.
Anonymous said...
No one is invincible or that well protected..opportunities eventually find one person that can originate the fall...Rome remembers!
Thugs that flip from law enforcers to criminals cannot psychologically perfect the two!
Anonymous said...
I've been reading this blog for months but have never left a comment until now.

I've known about the corruption in the NYS courts for many years as my husband worked as a judge's law secretary until he retired last year.

Maybe- just maybe -there is hope with this Federal Justice Scheindlin.
manhattan surrogate court victim said...
I too filed complaints against attorneys in the 1st Dept., the result being that Thomas Cahill double talked me. I always wonder why, what was going on. Now I can understand a little. It was all corrupt, the fix was in. As a direct result I gave up and never filed a complaint against the Surrogage Judge which I should have done. I will try to join this law suit also. God Bless Judge Scheindlin
Anonymous said...
How complaints against attorneys or law firms were buried over the years? One can only guess at how many complaints against Judges received the same fare.

Thursday, December 13, 2007

Ethics Scandal Hearing Greeted With $1.5 Billion Dollar Lawsuit (MORE, CLICK HERE)

 

Tammany Hall II, Public Corruption Scandal Grows – by $1.5 Billion

A federal court-ordered hearing in the New York State Ethics Scandal Case (Anderson v. State of New York 07cv 9599) was held in Courtroom 15C of the United States Courthouse at 500 Pearl Street in Manhattan on Wednesday, December 12, 2007 before U.S. District Court Judge Shira A. Scheindlin.

Numerous reports confirm the hearing quickly turned extraordinary.

Federal Judge Scheindlin first read into the record a list of 8 different people from around the world who had copied the court on various correspondence concerning the New York Ethics Scandal and their support for the appointment of a federal monitor.

An author of one of the letters, P. Stephen Lamont of Iviewit, immediately advised the court that he was withdrawing his copying of his letter to the court in light of an associated federal complaint filed shortly before the hearing.

A court law clerk then handed Judge Scheindlin a copy of the just-filed complaint, Bernstein v. 1st Dept. Disciplinary Committee, et al. (S.D.N.Y 07cv 11196, filed December 12, 2007)

The $1.5 Billion Dollar Bernstein complaint alleges widespread public corruption in the handling of ethics complaints involving fraud and stolen U.S Patents by various New York law firms and attorneys. The action by Bernstein has been marked as an associated case to the Anderson lawsuit since both matters concern allegations of Ethics Committee Public Corruption and, additionally, both cases seek the appointment of a federal monitor over New York State ethics committees.

Bernstein’s allegations, and known as "Patentgate" are currently under review by numerous U.S. Senators, the U.S. Congress, the United States Patent and Trademark Office and the FBI’s watchdog unit, the Office of Professional Responsibility in Washington, D.C.

The defense counsel in the Anderson matter, a Lee Alan Adlerstein from the New York State Attorney General’s office, attempted to categorize the Anderson case as a simple wrongful termination action, but the Judge did not see it that way-- and said so.

“This case is not a garden variety…it’s a whistleblower…there is that aspect to it…," said Judge Scheindlin.

Informed sources reveal that at least one more associated federal complaint will be filed soon, along with other various filings that will pull together serious allegations of ethics related public corruption from every corner of New York State.
Stay tuned to this story: Tammany Hall II – this is history, albeit ugly, in the making…

And we’ll be posting the One and one-half Billion dollar Patentgate lawsuit soon!

 

19 comments:

panaramic view said...
This is a good start! I'll be watching.
iviewit fan said...
I can't wait to see the Iviewit filing.
Dirk Raat the Netherlands said...
Excellent news! Let the lawsuits fly in! Overhere, in the Netherlands, I am still working on a amended ethics grievance -- against Melvyn Weiss and associates at Milberg Weiss -- which will reveal, in most obvious terms, that the Disciplinary Committee whitewashed the ethics grievance against Mel Weiss. My case is not a billion dollar issue, though I will hold the Disciplinary Committee responsible for their severe negligence [tort] in my case. Secondly: I have a surprise due for judge Greenaway in the Genta litigation:-)) Stay tuned!
ny attorney said...
I was present for part of the Anderson v. State matter, then it was annouced that Mr. S. Lamont/Iviewit had just filed this case - WOW! Even the Judge took note! From what I could see there were some other folks that additionally wanted to join in. Good Luck it looks to be interesting.
Anonymous said...
Here is hoping NYC gives a big push to cases filed in areas outside of it! It should be more impactful if federal court sees cases filed against OCA AGENCIES ALL OVER THE STATE! Good luck to all of what is going on in NYC!
Anonymous said...
just take a look at the list of employees over thier. Just look at
at the racial diversity of Manhattan and then look at how few minoritys that work thier.
Look at how they hire people not by qualifications by who they know to get in.
IF any private company had such a small percentage of minoritys they probably would be sued and forced to become equal opertunity employers.
writing on the wall said...
That's the way the big law firms especially the "white Shoe" ones get to control the system and get away with all their criminal doings - they don't want any n*****s in the wood pile!
Anonymous said...
Is the State of New YOrk standing up for the crooks now? Is part of a coverup?
appalled said...
I've seen the website on "Iviewit" the ones that filed this federal suit, man it's wild! There are pictures of this guy Bernstein's car that the lawyers/thugs blew-up! This is serious dude!
Promising... said...
Luisa Esposito said...I was there and I think Honorable Scheindlin was great. Hopefully they'll assign federal monitoring and Justice will PREVAIL....
Shyster Busters.. said...
Thank God for CorruptCourts..how else would we know what these shysters were up to.
Anonymous said...
Lord only knows what else these creeps got away with... people were too afraid to go against these monsters and bullies, therefore, never reporting it..or reported it and it was swept under the rug.
Anonymous said...
i want to see Cahill and Cohen in handcuffs for all the damage that they have done to good people!
Anonymous said...
oops, I meant exposecorruptcourts..typo
Anonymous said...
Can't wait to see the complaint against the woman that was sexually abused by her attorney Allen H. Isaac and how they are protecting him..He should be behind bars and disbarred..but yet he continues to practice law..go figure..he's got the DDC in his pocket also...I hope she exposes their corruption in her lawsuit, so that all could see how the DDC even protects sexual predators.
visitor said...
While surfing I came across this blog which is very good. It is even more important because approximately 6 years ago I filed several complaints against attorneys in the 1st Dept. that just died. I kept calling speaking with various people including Mr. Thomas Cahill and all I was told was to resend the complaints because they could not find them, they had been lost. After the 5th time I gave up! Reading all this I now have a pretty good handle on what happened.
Anonymous said...
OCA cannot get away with anything more. Shortly, some DISCOVERY will be expressed, exposed and manifested...much to the stupidity and arrogance of their legal dept and ATTY JOHN J. SULLIVAN, ESQ. What is included in this document is going to be A ball buster and shock for these losers! OCA never knew what went on upstate for years! The type of people, the events and finally the judicial actions taken without any knowledge of all of this ( only an attempt by NYC employees and judiciary to protect the ethnicity and political status of these hacks), will be a JOY to present! MARK YOUR CALENDAR FOR jan 2, 2008!
Anonymous said...
When is the NY TImes going to FULLy run a story on the corruption.
Anonymous said...
IS THIER GOING to be a public hearing on January 2, 2008?

the fedral building on Pearl st
someone posted a comment.
IF YES, please post the information
that should be good

YONKERS TRIBUNE

January 14, 2008

Federal Judge Scheindlin Asserts Ethics Scandal Cases Related

YONKERS, NY -- On Thursday, January 10, 2008, U.S. Federal District Court Judge Shira A. Scheindlin directed that the $1.5 Billion Iviewit “patentgate” case ( Download iviewit_patentgat_complaint_case.pdf ), filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York on December 12, 2007, be assigned to her court.

Patent Attorney Ray Joao, a Yonkers resident, is one among other defendants alleged to have stolen inventions from Iviewit and calling those inventions their own.

Judge Scheindlin accepted the Iviewit lawsuit, Bernstein v. Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee, as related to the pending New York attorney ethics scandal case, Anderson v. The State of New York.   

Allegations of covering-up and whitewashing complaints against favored attorneys find both cases seeking the appointment of a federal monitor to take over New York’s statewide attorney ethics committees. A third lawsuit, filed December 28, 2007, is currently under review by Judge Scheindlin to be designated as an associated case in the state ethics scandal, Tammany Hall II.

Federal Magistrate Judge Douglas F. Eaton has also been assigned to both the Anderson and Iviewit matters.   

In another order, signed January 9, 2008, Judge Scheindlin directed U.S. Marshals to serve the Iviewit lawsuit on the listed defendants.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/2176356/25107578

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Federal Judge Scheindlin Asserts Ethics Scandal Cases Related:

Comments

Is Ray Joao the same guy who was helping Borrelli with his campaign??

INVESTIGATIONS MASTERS DOCUMENT


 

Petition to Feinstein to submit legislation to suspend patent pending applications of Iviewit for an indefinite period while investigations are ongoing.

CONGRESS.ORG ARTICLE 1 - PROPOSED LEGISLATION TO PROTECT INVENTORS

OR

february 02, 2007 senate bill for changes to patent law to protect inventor rights in situations of fraud and conspiracy against the united states which endanger inventor rights.  Submitted to the honorable united states senator Dianne Feinstein


Article relating to uncovering of corruption with the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department - Departmental Disciplinary Committee, Chief Counsel, Thomas J. Cahill.  Cahill who aided and abetted by blocking three Iviewit complaints against Proskauer partners, Kenneth Rubenstein (MPEGLA LLC Counsel), Steven C. Krane (former New York State Bar Association) & Raymond Joao, from investigation.  Then he got caught in conflicts and violation of public offices that led to a Supreme Court of New York Court Order for immediate investigation of the three Proskauer partners and a Special Inquiry investigation of Cahill.

July 21, 2007 Expose Corrupts Courts Article 1

CONGRESS.ORG - ARTICLE 2 - NEW YORK SUPREME COURT DISCIPLINARY CHIEF COUNSEL THOMAS CAHILL TO RESIGN AND RELATED SCANDAL TO HIS INVOLVEMENT IN AIDING AND ABETTING IN THEFT OF FUNDS FROM 9/11 RED CROSS FUND


More corruption with Cahill, see above note.

Expose Corrupt Courts Article 2 - Corruption regarding Thomas Cahill, formerly at the Supreme Court of New York First Department Disciplinary Committee


The Office of Professional Representatives Before the European Patent Office,  who regulates attorney conduct, sends documents to Iviewit found in the EPO files while investigating the Iviewit matters, clearly distinguishing them as fraudulent in comparison to the documents filed by Iviewit counsel, Martyn Molyneaux.  Missing exhibits and altered document text in EPO files.

CONGRESS.ORG - ARTICLE 3 - Matters of Iviewit: Irrefutable Fraud at the European Patent Office


April 9, 2007 ~ iviewit response to irrefutable fraudulent documents in the European patent office files


April 5, 2007 institute of professional representatives before the European patent office - matters regarding fraudulent patent documents tendered by the  European patent office showing irrefutable fraud on epo patent submissions


Chart showing ongoing investigations, derailed investigations and court actions.

ongoing investigations - exhibit to Feinstein bill


Chart showing how complaints have been blocked using violations of public offices, the hierarchy of conflicts and who and how they relate.  Those highlighted in green are not yet found denying due process and procedure

Denial of Due Process flow chart


Article relating to uncovering of corruption with the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department - Departmental Disciplinary Committee, Chief Counsel, Thomas J. Cahill.  Cahill blocked three Iviewit complaints against Proskauer partners, Kenneth Rubenstein (MPEGLA LLC Counsel), Steven C. Krane (former New York State Bar Association) & Raymond Joao, from investigation and got caught in conflicts and violation of public offices.  That led to a court order for investigation of the three Proskauer partners and a Special Inquiry Investigation of Cahill.

July 27, 2007 expose Corrupt courts article regarding iviewit & the denial of due process in NY


Nita Lowey, sends Lamont shareholder complaint to Dingell, as the Commerce Department is centrally involved in the matters and the matters have importance to survival of free commerce in America.  Dingell has his counsel review and himself and moves the matters to the Judiciary Committee for investigation.

January 11, 2007 PRESS RELEASE!!!!

John D. Dingell (D-MI 15th), Chair, House Energy & Commerce Committee alerts & forwarded to the House Judiciary Committee, Iviewit's Affirmed Written Statement, submitted by former CEO P. Stephen Lamont, concerning fraud on the USPTO and Dept of Commerce

or

http://mmdnewswire.com/content/view/1116/

or

Hard Copy


Nita Lowey's letter moving the Iviewit matters to Dingell.

January 07, 2007 PRESS RELEASE!!!!

http://www.i-newswire.com/pr85494.html

or

January 06 2006 Iviewit Press Release - Rep. Nita Lowey (D-NY 18th) requests investigation of thefts of Iviewit intellectual properties by Chair, House Energy & Commerce, John D. Dingell (D-MI 15th).  In a letter dated November 28th 2006 from Lowey to Lamont: “I received your letter requesting that the Energy & Commerce Committee investigate the allegations you have made regarding the theft of patents from Iviewit Technologies, Inc...I forwarded your letter to the incoming Chair of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, Mr. John Dingell. …I trust that Mr. Dingell will give this matter the consideration that it deserves.


Iviewit former CEO, P. Stephen Lamont at Alberto Gonzales hearings protesting the loss of the Iviewit case files by the FBI and US Attorney offices, look for the guy with the Iviewit T-Shirt at 14 & 30 secs into video



  Partial Evidence Table for United States District Court - Southern District of New York

Case # 07 Civ. 11196 (SAS) Eliot I. Bernstein, et al. v. Appellate Division First Department, Department Disciplinary Committee et al.

Related Case

Case No. 07 Civ. 9599 (SAS-AJP) Christine C. Anderson v. the State of New York, et al.

Judge Shira A. Scheindlin

  - Click any piece, patience at high speeds as many of the pieces are large.

 

 

   
1 09 522 721 Filing with the United States Patent & Trademark Office claiming that per the direction of Harry I. Moatz, Director of the Office of Enrollment & Discipline, Iviewit & Crossbow Ventures were seeking the Commissioner of Patents to suspend the Iviewit patents based on evidence of Fraud on the United States Patent & Trademark Office by Iviewit former Intellectual Property attorneys, Kenneth Rubenstein, Proskauer Rose LLP, Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolf & Schlissel, Raymond Anthony Joao, Foley & Lardner, William J. Dick, Douglas Boehm, Steven Becker, Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman, Thomas Coester, Norman Zafman, Farzahd Ahmini, Christopher & Weisberg PA, Krishna Narine, Andrew Barroway, Schiffrin & Barroway and others.  This led to the Commissioner of Patents suspending certain of the Iviewit patent applications into an infinite black hole.  The form also included inventor change forms which have gone wholly unresolved while patents are in black hole at the United States Patent & Trademark Office.'
2 March 10, 1900 to March 10, 2020.  These are dates on fax headers on a patent filing with the United States Patent & Trademark Office on a Patent Application Oath & Declaration filed by Raymond Joao.  This application is a fraud and the fax headers on the page are part of the explanation.  Both fax machines' dates were changed to look like March 10, 2000 but instead come out as 3/10/1900 and 3/10/2020.  This application also is entirely different than the application signed by the inventors. 
3 1997 07 Kenneth Rubenstein of Proskauer Rose starts MPEGLA LLC patent pool while at Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolf and Schlissel.
4 August 08 1997 MPEGLA - note they claim to have Department of Justice approval although the DOJ claims they have no such approval.
5 1998 12 29 IVIEWIT BIZ PLAN
6 1999 01 08 Christopher Wheeler of Proskauer Rose letter regarding delaying getting back to inventor Bernstein after receiving patent disclosures.
7 1999 01 15 Proskauer letter regarding Iviewit Corporation a company that disappears although bills are generated through it.
8 1999 01 15 Proskauer letter regarding Iviewit Corporation, a company that does not exist or perhaps it is another Proskauer owned entity involved in theft of the patents through a complex shell game with identically named and similarly named companies
9 1999 01 28 Letter from Iviewit to Albert Gortz of Proskauer Rose asking why Kenneth Rubenstein was not at Proskauer Rose as was told to Iviewit Shareholders and instead was found to be at Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolf & Schlissel.
11 1999 02 17 - Interactive Week article where Intel engineers are quoted as stating the Internet, at speeds under 1.5Mbps, would be text based with banners, no video or imaging of quality at the lower bandwidths.
12 1999 02 18 Christopher Wheeler letter regarding Proskauer and Kenneth Rubenstein review of patents.  Rubenstein is patent expert reviewing the patents for patentability.
13 1999 02 18 Christopher Wheeler of Proskauer letter regarding Kenneth Rubenstein review of patents.
14 1999 02 22 Raymond Joao Patent Application before he says he knows Iviewit, Joao said he filed in March although it was supposed to be in January this application is missing from his bills and is in February.
15 1999 02 22 Raymond Joao patent application before he says he knows Iviewit, Joao bills for patent in March stating he is working on application.  Yet, the filing card shows it was sent in 2/99.
16 1999 02 PATENT FILING RECEIPT - JOAO SAYS HE DOES NOT FILE ANYTHING UNTIL MARCH!
18 1999 03 02 Kenneth Rubenstein letter to inventor Bernstein regarding how to do patents.  Rubenstein states in deposition that he does not know Bernstein, never spoke with him and that he knew nothing about the inventions.
19 1999 04 16 - Christopher Wheeler gets a CD with full screen video disclosure and in his deposition he states that at this time he was unaware of full screen video inventions.  Note how Wheeler tries to constantly scramble attachments.
20 1999 04 16 Proskauer and Wheeler get info for full screen video invention.  Wheeler in deposition states he did not know of video invention prior to Real3D meeting.  This indicates he had seen the videos and retained cd's with the inventions on them. 
21 1999 04 26 NDA - Goldman Sachs - Jeffrey Friedstein & Donald Kane.
22 1999 04 26 Proskauer opinion letter for Hassan Miah and Earthlink investors Sky Dylan Dayton and Kevin O'Donnell.  Wheeler sends the opinion to Richard Rosman, Esq.  Wheeler states in deposition that Proskauer never reviewed the Iviewit patents and never made any opinions.  The patent guy Miah refers to is Kenneth Rubenstein and Miah is from Xing and former fame for role in CAA/Intel Multimedia Lab  responsible for bringing multimedia to prior text based Internet.
23 1999 04 27 Richard D. Rosman, Esq. letter to Christopher C. Wheeler of Proskauer Rose, Hassan Miah wants to speak to Kenneth Rubenstein, the Iviewit patent attorney, thinks he knows from MPEG.
24 1999 04 27 Rosman to Wheeler letter showing Hassan wants opinion of Proskauer's Rubenstein who he knows from MPEGLA, Wheeler sends a Proskauer opinion stating their retained counsel finds it to be novel and patentable.  Wheeler lies under deposition and to Florida Bar stating he does not know anything about the technologies and never opined.
25 1999 04 27 Proskauer patent opinion.
26 1999 05 14 Real 3D deal.
27 1999 05 24 Real 3D meeting.
28 1999 05 30 Miah letter asking to email Iviewit patent counsel Rubenstein some questions.
29 1999 05 30 Miah Letter requesting to talk with Kenneth Rubenstein.
31 1999 06 01 Donald G. Kane, Iviewit Board member and member of Goldman Sachs, letter on structuring the companies.
33 1999 06 01 Hassan Miah letter forwarded to Rubenstein.
35 1999 06 03 Joao patent filing with the United States Patent & Trademark Office with a blanked out date.  This document is later submitted to Japanese Patent Office and they reject the document.
37 1999 06 09 - Armstrong Hirsh Jackoway Tyerman & Wertheimer letter to Wheeler confirming Proskauer and Rubenstein patent opinion for Armstrong Hirsh investors.  This wholly contradicts Wheeler and Rubenstein depositions that Proskauer did no patent work or opinions
39 1999 06 11 Wheeler hand notes regarding meeting with Intel, Silicon Graphics, Inc. and Lockheed Martin at Real 3D Inc.  States disclosure of video and imaging inventions
41 1999 06 18 Proskauer bill for Iviewit Corporation, a company that does not exist, we think
42 1999 06 24 Lewin letter to Wheeler regarding his conflict of interests with Visual Data.  Visual Data was an early violator of their NDA and when we found out we also found out that Lewin had undisclosed conflict.
43 1999 06 24 Lewin and Wheeler regarding conflict of interest with Proskauer and Goldstein Lewin client Visual Data.  Wheeler failed to disclose they were a client of his and then after signing an NDA Visual Data begins using the Iviewit process without authorization.
44 1999 06 30 - Gerald Stanley CEO of Real 3D (Intel, SGI and Lockheed) opinion on the technologies.
45 1999 06 30 Real 3D Opinion and Licensing Info - We start to see evidence of companies we never heard of. Now there appears an Iviewit LLC and an Iviewit.com LLC.
46 1999 07 19 Armstrong Hirsh Jackoway Tyerman & Wertheimer letter to Wheeler at Proskauer asking why NDA's are in iviewit inc. a company they have no stock in or anyone else.
47 1999 07 23 Proskauer Opinion Letter to Huizenga Holdings via Cris Branden.  Another opinion on the technologies this time for Wheeler's client Wayne Huizenga for investment.  Huizenga invested $500,000 based on this opinion and Wheeler claims in deposition he did not know about the technologies and never opined.
49 1999 09 08 Proskauer letter by Wheeler to Lewin for payment of bills after Huizenga funding.  Wheeler in deposition states payments were not based on funding, this letter appears to be a fraud.
50 1999 09 08 Proskauer Retainer almost one year after being retained, bogus document by Utley and Wheeler.
52 1999 09 20 Meeting with Kenneth Rubenstein, Raymond Joao, Brian Utley, Steven Filipek of Fish & Richardson PC.  The meeting was in New York at Rubenstein's Office, yet Rubenstein denies even knowing us other than to refer Joao in his deposition.  Filipek had questions regarding the patents he viewed, claiming they appeared to miss the invention.
53 1999 Not dated Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolf & Schlissel Patent Portfolio.
54 1999 Brian Utley resume given to Iviewit by Wheeler (his best friend) showing false statements about his past.  He conceals former patent theft attempt from his past employer Diamond Turf Equipment, Inc. with Wheeler and William Dick and where Utley was fired with cause and the company was closed due to this attempted crime.  Also, false claims of his academic career.
55 2.19.99 Proskauer Agreement with Jenex draft.
56 2000 03 09 Brian Utley writes letter to Raymond Joao, after Joao is thought to be writing patents wrong and possibly in his name.  Decision is made to replace Joao with William Dick and Foley & Lardner LLP.  Utley suddenly claims Joao patents have mistakes and major missing items.  Good Guy - Bad Guy.  Dick replaces Joao but instead of correcting Joao errors, wrong info and inventors, they further perpetuate the fraud.
57 2000 04 01 James Armstrong letter regarding Utley screwing up patents.
59 2000 04 11 Foley and Lardner - Invitation to Correct Defects patent filing.
60 2000 04 11 Foley and Lardner - Invitation to Correct Defects
61 2000 04 16 Iviewit letter to Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolf and Schlissel to transfer patent docs to Foley and Lardner.
62 2000 05 11 - Foley and Lardner letter stating there are problems with Joao's patents.  All patents are not assigned to Iviewit Holdings per patent office.
63 2000 05 11 Wachovia Securities letter from Foley & Lardner regarding the Iviewit patents and is found later to be wholly wrong regarding assignments and other issues according to information from the United States Patent & Trademark Office.
64 2000 05 11 Wachovia Securities letter from Foley & Lardner stating false information regarding assignments and missing inventions.  False statements for a Wachovia Private Placement by Foley and Lardner, a securities fraud.
65 2000 05 19 Armstrong Hirsh Jackoway & Tyerman investor letters further showing Rubenstein as Patent advisor now with Dick aiding and abetting him versus Joao.
66 2000 05 25 Dr Christopher Taylor Consulting Agreement
67 2000 05 25 Dr Christopher Taylor Consulting Agreement
68 2000 06 06 Foley & Lardner request Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolf and Schlissel and Joao files, claiming information is missing and not on file with the United States Patent & Trademark Office.
69 2000 06 06 Foley & Lardner requests Meltzer Lippe Goldstein & Schlissel files, stating that Joao has not transferred all patent applications and files, Joao does not send a US application and tries to replace it with a PCT.  Once caught he sends file 5865-10 which he replaces patent signed by Eliot, Jude and Zakirul with his initial provisional filing.  This is the application with fax dates of 1900 and 2020 stamped on them.
70 2004 06 09 Copy to Eliot Spitzer of Paul Curran's investigation of Thomas Cahill, Chief Counsel of the First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee, stemming from the conflicts of Cahill Rubenstein and Steven Krane and violations of public office.
71 2000 06 13 Foley & Lardner Patent Portfolio.
72 2000 06 22 PR News Ellen DeGeneres.
73 2000 06 23 iviewit.com unveils streaming video coverage
of the ELLEN DEGENERES ‘Americana 2000’
Comedy Tour at SHOWBIZ EXPO.
 
74 2000 07 07 Florida Sun Sentinel Article regarding Iviewit and Eliot Bernstein
75 2000 07 22 - Proskauer marketing letter to their clients regarding Iviewit technologies and Wheeler claims under deposition that he did not really know about the technology and thought Iviewit was a portal???
76 2000 07 24 Foley & Lardner Patent Portfolio.
77 2000 07 24 Letter from Foley and Larder stating Joao patents are defective and are missing key info and disclosures.
78 2000 07 25 Dr Christopher Taylor Milwaukee Engineering Video study showing Iviewit invention for video plays better than true full-screen video, very cool.
79 2000 07 25 Dr Christopher Taylor Report Iviewit Scaling Video Tests.
80 2000 07 25 Foley and Lardner attempting to switch Patent Portfolio after Iviewit learned of Utley Patents that were written without company authorization.
81 2000 07 25 Foley & Lardner Patent Portfolio.
82 2000 07 31 Taped Meeting Foley & Lardner where they are asked questions about the patents discovered in Utley's name and why the patents are not assigned, etc.
83 2000 07 31 Transcript of Meeting with Foley and Lardner and Board Members regarding finding patents in wrong names and assignees.
84 2000 07 Iviewit MTV license draft.
85 2000 08 02 Taped Foley & Lardner meeting part 2.
86 2000 08 02 Taped Foley & Lardner meeting part 2.
87 2000 08 02 Taped Meeting Foley and Lardner Part 1 busted stealing patents.
88 2000 08 02 Taped Meeting Foley and Lardner Part 2 busted stealing patents.
89 2000 08 03 Letter From Foley & Lardner, Doug Boehm, stating he filed patents with 10 minutes to filing and made some mistakes.  
90 2000 08 04 Letter From James F. Armstrong finding math errors on Foley & Lardner filed patent applications.
91 2000 08 04 Taped Meeting Foley & Lardner Part 1.
92 2000 08 04 Taped Meeting Foley & Lardner Part 1 busted stealing patents.
93 2000 08 09 James F. Armstrong, Foley & Lardner Douglas Boehm letter regarding Foley patent errors that were supposed to be filed corrected but still were filed wrong.  This was beginning to discovery that something was afoul with Foley, we had no idea the extent at the time.
94 2000 08 09 Douglas Boehm of Foley & Lardner letter to Iviewit regarding his math errors and tries to diffuse the glowing malpractice claim and blame the problem on Eliot for Foley's errors.  He is an engineer.
95 2000 08 09 Foley & Lardner trying to explain how math and other errors were filed in once corrected patent applications.
96 2000 08 09 James Armstrong letter to Foley & Lardner regarding the errors in the patent filings.
97 2000 08 25 Wheeler sends to Rubenstein PATENT PORTFOLIO BINDERS, contradicts Rubenstein's entire deposition, Wheeler delivers these documents to attorney Selz, after Rubenstein was already caught perjuring himself.
98 2000 08 25 Wheeler sending to Rubenstein PATENT BINDER wholly contradicts Rubenstein Wheeler and Utley Depositions, Rubenstein claims he never received or saw Iviewit Patents ~ OUCH.
99 2000 08 29 Wachovia Securities letter to Chairman of the Board regarding having done their Due Diligence, Foley & Lardner states Iviewit Holdings, Inc. is owner and assignee of all patents.  Patent office information from OED Director Moatz contradicts this.  Also in taped meetings held, Foley then admits that not all patents are assigned.  Foley materially misrepresents to Wachovia the status of the patents and fails to list a missing Joao application = securities fraud.
100 2000 08 29 Wachovia Securities letter to Simon Bernstein, Board Member, regarding investment due diligence.
101 2000 09 01 NEWS ARTICLE - Grabbing the Holy Grail of Digital Webcasting - Digital Webcast.
102 2000 09 05 Real 3D / Intel / RYJO letter warning of using Iviewit technologies in violation of Real 3D / Intel NDA, RYJO tries to steal concepts and get intellectual property in his name, aided and abetted by Proskauer, Brian Utley and Michael Reale who thought RYJO and Ryan Huisman had not signed an NDA.  Proskauer drafted a license whereby Iviewit would license its technology from RYJO.
103 2000 09 08 Shareholder James Armstrong writes letter requesting to know where the patents assignments are and why they were not filed based on the taped meetings with Foley & Lardner.
104 2000 09 08 James Armstrong letter to the Iviewit Board asking why the assignments on the patents were not filed. This would be shareholder fraud.
105 2000 09 09 Bernstein and Douglas Boehm letters regarding bad math filed and other issues.  Foley & Lardner busted here.
106 2000 09 09 Bernstein, Foley & Lardner letters pertaining to errors in the patents filed.
107 2000 09 18 - 60 233 344 - Utley Zoom and Pan Camera patent filing with his name on them, this contradicts Utley's deposition that he knows nothing about a camera patent application in his name, oops. Fraud on the patent office, fraud on Iviewit, compounded with perjury.
108 2000 09 20 Raymond Hersh, Iviewit CFO, letter to Arthur Andersen stating Erika Lewin, CPA and in-house Iviewit accountant was miffed at being accused of misleading auditors.  When reviewing the work, she seriously misstates information to auditors to keep their scam hidden.  
109 2000 09 20 Raymond Hersh to Arthur Andersen, Erika Lewin accused of misleading auditors on corporate structure, it turns out to be entirely true.
110 2000 09 IVIEWIT, INC. of Delaware - Proskauer Rose has a confidentiality for this company but no company exists in Delaware with this name, how Proskauer.  This may be one of the fraudulent entities that Proskauer was stealing the patents through.
111 2000 09 IVIEWIT, INC. DEL PROSKAUER HAS CONFIDENTIALITY 
112 2000 10 09 ARTHUR ANDERSEN letter regarding Proskauer having to provide proof of Iviewit Holdings owning Iviewit Technologies,  to auditors which they never produce, instead going on a straight away course to destroy Iviewit and the records.  The audit was being conducted on behalf of Crossbow Ventures, whereby the Small Business Administration made up 2/3 of Crossbow Ventures loans.
113 2000 10 09 Arthur Andersen letter requesting proof that Iviewit Holdings, Inc. is owned by shareholders, turns out several Iviewit Holdings, Inc. exist, unraveling a corporate shell game where the other Iviewit Holdings, Inc. are owned by Proskauer and have stolen patents as their assets.
114 2000 11 27 ARTHUR ANDERSEN letters and termination letter of Iviewit as a client in the middle of an audit being conducted for the largest investor Crossbow Ventures in the middle of the audit where they found all kinds of problems.
115 2000 11 27 Arthur Andersen termination of audit letter, terminates Iviewit after almost one year of audit, after accusing Erika Lewin of fraud and finding problems with the companies.
116 2000 11 30 Foley & Lardner attempting to switch Patent Portfolio 2.
117 2000 11 30 Foley & Lardner attempting to switch Patent Portfolio 3.
118 2000 11 30 Foley & Lardner Patent Portfolio with Utley listed as an inventor, this is after Utley was busted with patents in his name and Foley tries to now include these patents we found.
119 2000 11 30 Foley & Lardner Patent Portfolio with 57103-122 being two different patents.  Foley's dockets get crazy as they try to adjust once caught in the fraud.  Suddenly, Utley shows up on multiple patents, replacing the original inventors and has two patents in his own name.  All of this was never disclosed to shareholders, etc.
120 2000 11 30 Foley & Lardner Patent Portfolio with 57103-122 twice and different patents.
121 2000 11 30 Portfolio page from Foley & Lardner does not match up and is missing now the 120 filing.
122 2000 12 20 Letter to Utley asking why invention applications are missing from patents and to modify Patents to include all things missing.  
123 2000 12 21 John D. Calkins, Senior Vice President New Media Business Development, Warner Bros. letter showing Utley sending Warner Bros. the Wachovia Private Placement Memorandum.
124 2000 12 NEWS RELEASE - Digital Webcast Article on Iviewit part2.
125 2000 Foley & Lardner Patent Portfolio Missing Dates - Utley busted and patents start showing up on fraudulent dockets.
126 2000 Iviewit income producing accounts for Encoding and Streaming licenses.
127 2000 Jorge Labarga's part in the Bush v. Gore presidential election fraud.  There goes America.
128 2001 01 01 - Kenneth Rubenstein of Proskauer's biography in the Wachovia Securities Private Placement Memorandum and listed as Iviewit PATENT COUNSEL & BOARD DIRECTOR, this wholly contradicts Rubenstein, Wheeler & Utley depositions.  
129 2001 01 01 Rubenstein listed in Wachovia Private Placement as patent counsel and board director, contradicts his entire deposition.
130 2001 01 01 Brian Utley fraudulent resume in the Wachovia Securities Private Placement Memorandum containing materially false and misleading claims about his former employment where he was caught stealing patents with none other than William J. Dick and Christopher Wheeler
131 2001 01 01 Wachovia Private Placement Memorandum - with bookmarks showing Rubenstein "Iviewit patent counsel" and retained intellectual property counsel
132 2001 01 01 Wachovia Private Placement Memorandum Bookmarked
133 2001 01 17 Utley lists Kenneth Rubenstein as patent counsel for an SBA Compliance Request for Crossbow SBIC Loans.  This completely contradicts Utley Rubenstein and Wheeler deposition statements whereby they claim Rubenstein was never an Advisor, patent counsel and that he was not on Board.
134 2001 01 17 Utley lists Kenneth Rubenstein as Board Director for SBA loan compliance documents and to Crossbow Ventures, this is contradicted in his deposition when he claims he never used Rubenstein as an advisor and Rubenstein had NOTHING to do with Iviewit, oops.
135 2001 01 22 Kenneth Rubenstein named as patent attorney in Wachovia Private Placement Memorandum
136 2001 01 Kenneth Rubenstein biography in the Wachovia Securities PPM and also listed as Iviewit PATENT Counsel.
137 2001 01 Wachovia Private Placement Memorandum - with bookmarks in color.
138 2001 04 14 Brian Utley fingers Kenneth Rubenstein in the minutes of a Board Meeting calling him our advisor, this wholly contradicts his deposition statements whereby he claims Rubenstein was never an advisor.  OOPS
139 2001 04 18 Brain Utley states in Board letter that Christopher Wheeler checked with Kenneth Rubenstein as an advisor to the Board, completely contradicting Utley Wheeler and Rubenstein depositions.
140 2001 04 18 Brian Utley writes letter to Board of Directors claiming that he checked with Rubenstein as an advisor to board.  This  contradicts Utley deposition statement that he never used Rubenstein as advisor, ouch.
141 2001 04 21 - James Armstrong letter regarding Brian Utley screwing up patents and company, right on the nose.
142 2001 05 04 Foley & Lardner letter to Brian Utley after he is fired, regarding the patents found in his name.  This document is part of Foley & Lardner's attempt to try and make it look legitimate after being busted.  
143 2001 05 08 - Board Meeting.doc
144 2001 06 07 Brian G. Utley police report full.
145 2001 06 07 Brian G. Utley police report, Embezzlement and Theft of Proprietary Systems
146 2001 06 12 - Book One NDA.
147 2001 06 12 - Book Three NDA.
148 2001 06 12 - Book Two NDA.
149 2001 06 12 - List of Confidentialities.
150 2001 06 25 - David J. Colter, Vice President Technology - Technological Operations Warner Bros. to Steve Case founder of AOLTW/WB regarding Eliot Bernstein and the Thought Journal.
151 2001 07 12 Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman portfolio shows Brian G. Utley patents, suddenly after Utley and Foley are caught with patents in wrong places, BSTZ is retained and Foley & Lardner sends patent portfolios that contain all kinds of new patents with all kinds of screw ups.
152 2001 07 12 Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman Patent Portfolio.
153 2001 07 13 Brian G. Utley police report embezzlement & theft leads to Utley returning stolen proprietary computers.  Later discovered that computers were taken to New Jersey company owned partially by investor Tiedemann Prolow.  Violates officer and director responsibilities and Utley's non-compete.
154 2001 07 17 Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman Patent status report.
155 2001 07 26 - Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman Power of Attorney Revocation 2.
156 2001 07 26 - Power of Attorney Revocation.
157 2001 08 01 Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman legal opinion and patent review revealing problems found.
158 2001 08 01 Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman patent evaluation, showing Utley had patents in his own name that were not assigned or owned by company, completely contradicting Utley deposition statements.  This is a majordomo f'up.
159 2001 08 01 Iviewit investor presentation for AOL with Aidan Foley as CEO.
160 2001 08 04 Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman letter to Iviewit showing Utley on patents.
161 2001 08 04 Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman letter to Iviewit showing Brian G. Utley on patents.
162 2001 08 29 - Irell & Manella bill for AOL license agreement they drafted.
163 2001 09 17 Jeffrey Friedstein of Goldman Sachs, Power of Attorney for Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman.
164 2001 09 18 Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman requests Bernstein to sign a Power Of Attorney on behalf of Brian G. Utley, to remove him from applications he was found to be on.  Evidence shows that patent filings were made with Utley in Japan by Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman after Utley was long gone, showing they continued the scam and played the good guy while furthering the crimes.
165 2001 12 10 Crossbow Ventures attempts to call loans.
166 2002 01 14 AOLTW / Warner Bros. letter stating they are using the Iviewit technologies in violation of their NDA!!!
167 2002 01 15 - AOLTW / Warner Bros. letter stating technologists checked with Kenneth Rubenstein who opined favorably on the Iviewit patents.  This contradicts Rubenstein, Wheeler and Utley's statements under deposition and to the Florida Bar and the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department Disciplinary Committee.  REMEMBER, RUBENSTEIN STATES HE KNOWS NOTHING AND PROSKAUER NEVER OPINED OR DID PATENT WORK.  ooooops
168 2002 01 15 AOLTW / Warner Bros. investment due diligence letter stating that Rubenstein opined favorably on the patents.
169 2002 01 15 AOLTW RUBENSTEIN OPINION
170 2002 01 15 AOLTW RUBENSTEIN OPINION comments
171 2002 03 19 - Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman Japanese Patent Office filing for an Utley patent after he was fired over one year and they were supposed to be removing him from patents.  Iviewit did not discover this until US Investigations led to research in Japan and this is when BSTZ was further found to be part of the conspiracy.  This evidences that BSTZ portfolios had false and misleading information regarding these patents.
172 2002 03 28 Anthony Frenden statement regarding stolen investor money and proprietary equipment.  Also shows that they tried to bribe employees with stolen cash.  Funds are believed to be investor funds including monies of the Small Business Administration.
173 2002 04 22 Raymond A. Joao News Article claiming Joao has ninety, yes 90, patents in his name, this article needs to be checked for accuracy to see if it is a true publication on that date.
174 2002 04 22 Raymond Joao Article Stating Joao has 90 patents in his name and showing his stolen Airplane Video patent concept, stolen from Iviewit.
175 2002 04 23 William Kasser, Iviewit bookkeeper letter to Eliot Bernstein regarding Goldstein Lewin accounting fraud on financial projections.  This represents more securities fraud and accounting fraud.
176 2002 04 23 Kasser to Eliot regarding Lewin fraud on financial documents submitted to lenders.
177 2002 06 09 Patent Portfolio Compilation showing the Greenberg Traurig patent findings in comparison to what Iviewit patent attorneys prior had stated on their dockets.
178 2002 06 09 Patent Portfolio2.
179 2002 06 11 Iviewit letter for Harry Moatz of the United States Patent & Trademark Office titled "System and Method for fraud on USPTO" and chock full of evidence.
180 2002 06 11 System and Method for Fraud on USPTO.
181 2002 06 11 USPTO complaint filed as patent System & Method for Fraud on the USPTO.
182 2002 06 17 Joao timeline of events and analysis of his documents and the frauds committed.
183 2002 08 22 Brian G. Utley deposition, states all patents are assigned to Iviewit and no patents are in his name.  Contradictory evidence = patents in his name and all patents not assigned - confirmed by USPTO and leading to patent suspensions by commissioner.
184 2002 08 22 Brain G. Utley deposition states Kenneth Rubenstein is not an advisor, nor has he ever used him - Contradicted by Utley himself sending patent documents to Rubenstein and naming him as an advisor to the Board and other evidence.
185 2002 08 23 Brian G. Utley deposition that states William J. Dick was the attorney that wrote patents into Utley's name at his former employer Diamond Turf Equipment, Inc. which led to that business closing due to the thefts.  Christopher Wheeler through Proskauer, set up the company where the Utley stolen patents were transferred.  Wheeler lies to the Florida Bar and states he never did work for Brain Utley, then gets caught lying in his deposition.  Writes apology for his perjury to the Florida Bar.  All three of them failed to disclose the prior patent heist to anyone.
186 2002 08 23 Brian Utley deposition on Diamond Turf Equipment, Inc. and the patent dispute he had over the stolen intellectual properties with his former employer.
187 2002 08 23 Brian G. Utley deposition statement stating Christopher Wheeler knew about Diamond Turf Equipment, Inc. patent dispute.  Wheeler while recommending Utley as President of Iviewit failed to disclose this little patent theft or that he was involved.  William Dick never discloses his involvement when they bring him in to cover up Joao's crimes.  The concealment and falsifying Utley's resume shows intent and that they were a prior criminal enterprise.  Wheeler delivers Utley resume to the shareholders and completely fabricates Utley's past.
188 2002 08 23 Brian G. Utley deposition statement that William J. Dick never filed the patents for Diamond Turf Equipment but Dick, in his response the Virginia Bar, states he filed the patents in Utley's name to a company Christopher Wheeler at Proskauer had set up, Premiere Connection.  The Virginia Bar despite being provided the evidence of such false statements fails to take action.
189 2002 08 23 Brain G. Utley deposition statement that he knew nothing about a Zoom and Pan Camera patent application.  Contradictory evidence = Patent Application for Zoom and Pan on a Digital Camera filed in Utley's name without assignment to the company.
190 2002 08 23 Brian G. Utley deposition statement that there were patent disputes at Diamond Turf which he failed to put in his resume which led to his being fired by the owner Monte Friedkin and forcing the closure of Friedkin's company.  Where Dick, Wheeler and Utley were all involved shows a criminal enterprise of patent thieves.
191 2002 08 23 Brian G. Utley deposition statement that Christopher Wheeler never represented him.  Wheeler states that he did not ever represent Utley to the Florida Bar and then in deposition states that he formed a company for Utley.  The reason they want to hide this corporate formation is that it is the company where the stolen patents from Diamond TE went
192 2002 08 23 Utley deposition states he did not graduate college, this contradicts his sworn statements in a Wachovia Private Placement that he said he did graduate college
193 2002 09 20 Greenberg Traurig Proposal Patents
194 2002 09 20 Greenberg Traurig Proposal Patents.
195 2002 10 16 Notice of Appeal on Jorge Labarga case.
196 2002 10 25 Kenneth Rubenstein sworn statement to Judge Jorge Labarga trying to get out of his deposition and claiming he does not know anything about Iviewit.
197 2002 10 25 Kenneth Rubenstein statement to Judge Jorge Labarga, complete false statements to avoid a deposition at his law firms lawsuit against Iviewit for a bill.
198 2002 11 20 Kenneth Rubenstein full deposition with Exhibits CERT.  I KNOW NOTHING!
199 2002 11 20 Kenneth Rubenstein deposition regarding his being unsure a conflict check was done by Proskauer.  This would have prevented MPEGLA from using the Iviewit processes disclosed to Rubenstein as Iviewit patent counsel, while he was a founder and patent counsel & reviewer for MPEGLA LLC
200 2002 11 20 Kenneth Rubenstein deposition statement that he does not have Iviewit patent documents = Contradictory evidence is a letter showing Christopher Wheeler sending him the entire Iviewit Patent Portfolio.
201 2002 11 21 Christopher Wheeler deposition stating he does not know about the video inventions = Contradictory evidence shows that Wheeler was sent video invention disclosures and then later in his deposition he claims to have been at video disclosure meeting with Intel and Real3D engineers.
202 2002 11 21 Christopher Wheeler deposition does not know about video invention.
203 2002 11 21 Christopher Wheeler deposition regarding no conflicts check, neither him or Kenneth Rubenstein are sure a conflicts check was ever done.
204 2002 11 21 Christopher Wheeler deposition statement that Iviewit was a portal, he didn't know about the technologies and that Proskauer was hired for portal services and not to patent the inventions.  Contradictory evidence is overwhelming.
205 2002 11 21 Wheeler deposition statement that no Proskauer conflict of interest check was done.
206 2002 11 21 Wheeler deposition statement that Proskauer and Christopher Wheeler represented Brian G. Utley in the past.  They failed to disclose that this former work by Proskauer and Wheeler was for a company where stolen patents went at Utley's former employer.  Contradictory evidence = Wheeler's statements under deposition and to the Florida Bar that conflict, constituting perjury.  Also, Utley states in deposition that Wheeler never did work for him.  "Who's on first."
207 2002 11 21 Christopher Wheeler deposition stating Proskauer never opined on the technologies or had anything to do with patents.  Contradictory evidence = Wheeler/Proskauer patent opinions for the investors.  Wachovia Private Placement showing Wheeler and Rubenstein on the Board of Directors and claiming Kenneth Rubenstein and Proskauer are retained patent counsel.
208 2003 01 11 Palm Beach Post Article stating Crossbow Ventures sold an Iviewit company!  Problem -- Crossbow Ventures do not own the company to sell and failed to tell investors about it = securities fraud.  Evidence shows that SBA loans were written down and then the securities were sold = fraud on the SBA.
209 2003 01 11 Palm Beach Post Article Crossbow Sells Iviewit.
210 2003 01 11 Palm Beach Post Article Crossbow Sells Iviewit2
211 2003 01 11 Palm Beach Post Article Crossbow Sells Iviewit2.
212 2003 01 28 Proskauer v. Iviewit, Judge Jorge Labarga, Counter Complaint was filed but Labarga refused it claiming attorneys that were initially found representing Iviewit with no authority basically waived any rights to such.  It was not learned until much later that the suit involved fraudulent  companies set up by Proskauer with stolen intellectual properties in them and that the suit was part of a scheme with a fraudulent federal bankruptcy filing, to seize the patents in a shell game.
213 2003 01 31 Eliot Bernstein deposition, this document is well worth the read as Eliot Bernstein deposes the deposition takers from Proskauer, note, Proskauer is continuously representing themselves in all lawsuits and all bar complaints.
214 2003 02 25 Raymond Joao 9th district original attorney misconduct complaint - somehow gets transferred to the wrong district, the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee for prosecution with the Proskauer attorney misconduct complaints, although Joao is registered elsewhere.
215 2003 02 26 Original attorney misconduct complaint against Proskauer and Kenneth Rubenstein filed at the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee.
216 2003 02 26 Original Rubenstein Bar Action
217 2003 02 26 Original Florida Bar Complaint against Proskauer and Christopher Wheeler.
218 2003 03 20 Judge Jorge Labarga Court Order for Kenneth Rubenstein and Christopher Wheeler to return to take further deposition to answer previously unanswered questions that they tried to refuse to come back too after being caught lying and perjuring themselves in the first part.  The trial is thrown before they can be deposed again.
219 2003 04 07 - Christopher Wheeler perjured statement to the Florida Bar regarding Brian G. Utley.  Wheeler in a footnote in a response tries to minimize the extent of the lie he is caught in.  
220 2003 04 07 - Christopher Wheeler perjured Florida Bar statement.  Florida Bar while cognizant of the crime of perjury in an official proceeding fails to take any action, although Wheeler is caught beyond a reasonable doubt and apologizes for his lies in writing.  Oh yeah, the President of the Florida Bar turns out to be Wheeler's brother, James Wheeler, underling at the law firm of Broad and Cassel and fails to disclose such while receiving documents from Iviewit to investigate.
221 2003 04 07 - Christopher Wheeler and Proskauer's response to the bar complaint which is tendered by Matthew Triggs of Proskauer who acted in violation of his public office with the Florida Supreme Court agency The Florida Bar.
222 2003 04 07 - Christopher Wheeler and Proskauer's response to The Florida Bar bar complaint which was tendered by Matthew Triggs of Proskauer who acted in conflict of interest and violation of public office with his Supreme Court of Florida Bar Position.
223 2003 04 08 Raymond Joao's response to the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee.  Joao actually tries to accuse Iviewit of stealing his inventions. Coocoo.
224 2003 04 08 Raymond Joao's response to the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee.  Joao actually tries to accuse Iviewit of stealing his inventions. Coocoo.
225 2003 04 11 - Kenneth Rubenstein and Proskauer's response to the bar complaint filed at the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee authored by Proskauer Rose attorney Steven C. Krane, who acted in conflict of interest and violation of public offices with the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee and also in violation of his role as former President of the NY Bar Association precluding him from handling any bar complaints within a one year blackout and where he had personal and professional interests he also violated his ethics.  This sucks for like the guy who parades around as being an ethics leader, saddest day in the life of Socrates, rollin' in his grave.
226 2003 04 11 - Kenneth Rubenstein response authored by Proskauer attorney Steven C. Krane.  Krane was former New York State Bar Association President and former law clerk to New York Supreme Court Appellate Division, Krane was clerk for Chief Judge of New York, Judith Kaye who is also in conflict and abuse of public office as Kaye is married to a Porksour partner, who recently died, Stephen R. Kaye and Judith failed to take any actions when notified of the crimes in the courts she oversees!!!!!
227 2003 04 16 Supreme Court of New York First Department Disciplinary Committee regarding reply to Raymond Joao complaint.
228 2003 04 30 Eliot Bernstein / Iviewit response to Christopher Wheeler Florida Bar Complaint BOOKMARKED.  Wheeler's response it is later learned was tendered by his partner Matthew Triggs who was prohibited from representing any bar complaints due to his official position with the Florida Bar'
229 2003 04 30 Eliot Bernstein / Iviewit response to Christopher Wheeler Florida Bar Complaint BOOKMARKED.  Wheeler's response it is later learned was tendered by his partner Matthew Triggs who was prohibited from representing any bar complaints due to his official position with the Florida Bar. BOOKMARKED
230 2003 04 30 P. Stephen Lamont Rebuttal to Christopher Wheeler's response to the Florida Bar complaint filed against him. BOOKMARKED
231 2003 05 05 Florida Bar Receipt Filing
232 2003 05 06 Proskauer Florida Bar Receipt Filing
233 2003 05 23 Christopher Wheeler Admits Perjury and False Statements made to The Florida Bar in his response.  Of course Triggs, acting in conflict and violation of public office makes the perjurious statement a footnote.
234 2003 05 23 Christopher Wheeler Admits Perjury and False Statements made to The Florida Bar in his response.  Of course Triggs, acting in conflict and violation of public office makes the perjurious statement a footnote.
235 2003 05 23 Christopher Wheeler Response to Florida Bar Rebuttal 2, tendered by Matthew Triggs who acted in violation of his Florida Supreme Court Bar position in representing Wheeler.
237 2003 05 23 Wheeler Response to Rebuttal Partial
238 2003 05 26 Iviewit Rebuttal to Raymond Joao attorney misconduct complaint. 1753 Pages BOOKMARKED
241 2003 06 03 Iviewit Rebuttal to Wheeler 2nd Response to the Florida Bar complaint filed against him.  BOOKMARKED
242 2003 06 03 Iviewit Rebuttal to Wheeler Florida Bar Complaint 2nd Response Final
243 2003 06 04 Lorraine Christine Hoffman of The Florida Bar cover letter regarding Wheeler bar complaint.
244 2003 06 13 Kenneth Rubenstein affidavit to his deposition, where he writes in his answers without precedence, rhythm or reason.  Judge Jorge Labarga orders Rubenstein to return to deposition and answer the questions he refused the first time after walking out of his deposition.  Remember this is his deposition in his firms law suit.  
246 2003 07 01 Florida Bar Response Wheeler Complaint trying to claim that the federal state and international crimes presented them were more a civil matter.
247 2003 07 02 Iviewit Rebuttal to Kenneth Rubenstein's response to the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee. Final 2200+ Pages ALL
250 2003 07 04 Mitchell Welsch Letter of Understanding for Schiffrin and Barroway deal that went awry.
251 2003 07 16 Signed Letter of Understanding "LOU" between Iviewit & Schiffrin & Barroway for two million dollars and full funding of all legal counsel in all legal actions.  One must ask where are they and the story can be found in complaints filed at the Pennsylvania State Bar.  
252 2003 07 18 - Krishna Narine from Schiffrin & Barroway taking over patents and getting his family member Weisberg of Christopher & Weisberg, PA involved.
253 2003 07 18 - Krishna Narine from Schiffrin & Barroway taking over patents and getting his family member Weisberg of Christopher & Weisberg PA involved.
254 2003 07 22 - Krishna Narine of Schiffrin & Barroway transfers patents to Christopher & Weisberg.
255 2003 07 22 - Overnight and billing for transfer of patents to Christopher & Weisberg.
256 2003 07 22 Bernstein confirms patent transfer to Weisberg.
257 2003 07 24 Crossbow Ventures and DiStream Interactive deal.
258 2003 07 24 DiStream Interactive draft term sheet with Iviewit Inc. and Iviewit Holdings never executed as it was a bad deal and it was found that DiStream CEO Royal O'Brien had rewritten Iviewit patents into his name.
259 2003 07 25 Steven M. Selz of Selz & Muvdi letter regarding stand down orders in Labarga litigation because Schiffrin and Barroway operating under the signed LOU asked to replace him in the case.
260 2003 07 25 Steven M. Selz letter to Schiffrin & Barroway regarding stand down as counsel orders.
261 2003 07 28 Proskauer draft settlement that had so many flaws no one could sign it without repercussions of committing fraud against the Shareholders and they would not put in clause regarding the patents, that stated if the patents were damaged it was their liability.
262 2003 08 01 Judge Jorge Labarga grants Schiffrin & Barroway motion to withdraw as counsel, in a surprise move at a rehearing scheduling days after the original trial was cancelled by Labarga with no notice to Steven Selz, Iviewit's counsel or Iviewit.  This leaves Iviewit with no counsel on the eve trial, two law firms dismissed by Labarga whereby both said the other would be representing Iviewit.  
263 2003 08 01 Judge Jorge Labarga grants Steven M. Selz motion to withdraw as counsel for the upcoming trial after Selz states Schiffrin & Barroway who signed a binding Letter of Understanding would be handling the case.  Then Schiffrin & Barroway submits a surprise motion to withdraw and Labarga grants it, leaving Iviewit with no counsel. 
264 2003 08 01 Judge Jorge Labarga regarding Steven M. Selz's notice to withdraw and trial rescheduling.
265 2003 08 01 Schiffrin & Barroway notice to withdraw as counsel from Iviewit, breaching their binding LOU and legal retainer.
266 2003 08 01 Steven M. Selz withdrawal as counsel in Proskauer v. Iviewit.
267 2003 08 02 - Iviewit letter to Krishna Narine of Schiffrin & Barroway on Christopher & Weisberg PA failure to file response on patent after taking Iviewit as a client.
268 2003 08 02 - Iviewit letter to Christopher & Weisberg regarding their being retained by Schiffrin & Barroway, getting the patents transferred by Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman and then blowing off a patent filing in violation of Title 35 USC and the Federal Patent bar, for this they were added to the complaints with Harry I. Moatz, Director of the United States Patent & Trademark Office - Office of Enrollment & Discipline.
269 2003 08 04 Christopher & Weisberg withdrawal as counsel and attempts to claim they were not acting as counsel for Iviewit which is wholly untrue as they were retained by a family relative from Schiffrin & Barroway, Krishna Narine.  This seriously jeopardizes Iviewit with USPTO on patent filings.
270 2003 08 05 - Iviewit response to Christopher & Weisberg email stating they had missed a patent filing while being retained counsel.
271 2003 08 08 Federal Bureau of Investigation West Palm Beach Florida, original complaint filing with Glenda Moffat.
272 2003 08 12 Andrew Barroway of Schiffrin & Barroway Pennsylvania Bar complaint.
273 2003 08 13 Iviewit demand letter to Schiffrin & Barroway for performance under signed and binding LOU.
274 2003 08 13 Schiffrin & Barroway demand for performance letter.
275 2003 08 14 Christopher Wheeler involvement at Florida Atlantic University Foundation Scandal & Fuzion Fraud.  Utley and Wheeler controlled FAU foundation when scandal took place.  Wheeler was reported taking tax deduction on his portion of contribution to a Corvette for past president.
276 2003 08 28 Boca Raton Police Written Statement regarding stolen cash from Iviewit including funds from Tiedemann Prolow investment, Crossbow Ventures investments which were 2/3 Small Business Administration loans.
277 2003 09 02 - Boca Raton Police Department Written Statement regarding stolen intellectual property given to Detective Robert Flechaus who failed to perform his investigative duties and buried the complaints instead.
278 2003 09 02 Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee letter that was lost for months regarding holding off investigation of Kenneth Rubenstein, Proskauer Rose, Raymond Joao and Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolf & Schlissel.  
279 2003 09 02 Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee response regarding Raymond Joao, Proskauer Rose, Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolf & Schlissel and Kenneth Rubenstein bar complaints which comes way late as it was lost in the mail.  The document is probably fraudulent and tries to dismiss the complaints as a civil matter, although they ignore the state, federal and international crimes against the government and foreign nations exposed in the complaints.
280 2003 09 17 United States Patent & Trademark Office - Office of Enrollment & Discipline written statement to Harry I Moatz, Director of the OED.
281 2003 09 19 Motion for mistrial in the Proskauer v. Iviewit case based on the insane actions of Judge Jorge Labarga.
282 2003 09 23 United States Patent & Trademark Office - Office of Enrollment & Discipline written statement to Harry I Moatz, Director of the OED. Corrected.
283 2003 09 23 Virginia Bar Complaint filed against William J. Dick and Foley & Lardner for Dick's patent crimes.
284 2003 09 25 Certified letter to Harry I. Moatz and William Dick.
285 2003 09 26 - Iviewit letter to The Florida Bar, that civil case was over which is why the failed to investigate originally, although Florida Bar rules prohibit delaying investigation into bar complaints because of civil cases.
286 2003 09 02 Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee letter that was lost for months regarding holding off investigation of Kenneth Rubenstein, Proskauer Rose, Raymond Joao and Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolf & Schlissel.  
287 2003 10 02 - Letter to Florida Bar - Missing
288 2003 10 02 - Letter to Florida Bar - Not Signed Missing Exhibits
289 2003 10 02 Iviewit letter to The Florida Bar to re-file the complaint against Christopher Clark Wheeler as the civil litigation was completed.
290 2003 10 02 Iviewit letter to The Florida Bar to re-file the complaint against Christopher Clark Wheeler as the civil litigation was completed.
291 2003 10 08 Virginia Bar response to William J. Dick and Foley & Lardner bar complaint requesting more information.
292 2003 10 08 Virginia Bar response to William J. Dick and Foley & Lardner bar complaint requesting more information.
293 2003 10 13 - Florida Bar letter by Lorraine Christine Hoffman attempting to delay Christopher Wheeler bar complaint investigation still claiming it was before a civil court.  Hoffman knew that Judge Labarga had limited the Proskauer v. Iviewit case to strictly billing issues and denied a counter complaint that tried to bring in the patent crimes and other crimes committed.  Hoffman ignores these facts and continues to protect Wheeler, at the time it was unknown that the President of The Florida Bar, Kelly Overstreet Johnson worked for Wheeler's brother James Wheeler at Broad & Cassel a Florida law firm.  Johnson conceals the conflict while accepting information on the Wheeler complaint.
294 2003 10 13 The Florida Bar letter again delaying wheeler complaint based on civil litigation.
295 2003 10 15 Judicial Qualifications Commission of Florida complaint against Judge Jorge Labarga letter from Kennerly.
296 2003 10 30 Department of Justice complaint filed against Rubenstein and others for antitrust violations including their MPEGLA patent pooling scheme and claims that the DOJ approved the scheme.
297 2003 10 30 Department of Justice complaint filed against Rubenstein and others for antitrust violations including their MPEGLA patent pooling scheme and claims that the DOJ approved the scheme.
298 2003 10 30 Fax receipt for William J. Dick Virginia bar complaint response.
299 2003 11 09 AICPA Goldstein Lewin & Co. complaint against Erika & Gerald Lewin.
300 2003 11 10 - The Florida Bar letter response refusing to start investigation of Christopher Clark Wheeler of Proskauer and his bar complaint.
301 2003 11 10 - The Florida Bar letter response refusing to start investigation of Christopher Clark Wheeler of Proskauer and his bar complaint.
302 2003 11 14 P. Stephen Lamont letter to Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman asking where the intellectual property docket is.
303 2003 11 14 P. Stephen Lamont letter to Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman asking where the intellectual property docket is.
304 2003 11 17 - Final Judgment against Iviewit in the Proskauer v. Iviewit case.  Judgment was issued by Judge Jorge Labarga, after he cancelled the first trial with no notice to Iviewit or either of their law firms, Selz & Muvdi and Schiffrin & Barroway.  At the rescheduling hearing both Schiffrin & Barroway and Selz Muvdi withdrew as counsel stating the other would be handling the case.  Labarga let both go instead, despite the fact that Schiffrin & Barroway had signed a binding LOU/Legal Retainer agreement to represent Iviewit at the case.  This forced Iviewit to have no counsel and days later Labarga ruled a default on Iviewit for failure to retain replacement counsel.  Iviewit could not find counsel that fast in a almost three year case and Schiffrin and Selz refused to turn over necessary files needed to find new counsel or file an appeal.
305 2003 11 17 - Final Judgment against Iviewit in the Proskauer v. Iviewit case.  Judgment was issued by Judge Jorge Labarga, after he cancelled the first trial with no notice to Iviewit or either of their law firms, Selz & Muvdi and Schiffrin & Barroway.  At the rescheduling hearing both Schiffrin & Barroway and Selz Muvdi withdrew as counsel stating the other would be handling the case.  Labarga let both go instead, despite the fact that Schiffrin & Barroway had signed a binding LOU/Legal Retainer agreement to represent Iviewit at the case.  This forced Iviewit to have no counsel and days later Labarga ruled a default on Iviewit for failure to retain replacement counsel.  Iviewit could not find counsel that fast in a almost three year case and Schiffrin and Selz refused to turn over necessary files needed to find new counsel or file an appeal.
306 2003 11 19 - Iviewit letter to Eric Turner of The Florida Bar requesting a review of the Lorraine Christine Hoffman determination.
307 2003 11 19 - Iviewit letter to Eric Turner of The Florida Bar requesting a review of the Lorraine Christine Hoffman determination.
308 2003 11 20 - Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman Intellectual Property portfolio showing Japanese Patents and Utley Patents.
309 2003 11 20 - The Florida Bar re-examination notice stating they were reviewing the prior decision regarding the Christopher Wheeler bar complaint.
310 2003 11 20 - The Florida Bar re-examination notice stating they were reviewing the prior decision regarding the Christopher Wheeler bar complaint.
311 2003 11 22 - European Patent Office response to formal office action which exposes the fraud that Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman was supposed to be exposing to them and correcting but never did.  This document turns up later to be sent by Chris Mercer of the Institute of Professional Representatives before the European Patent Office who while investigating the EPO filings but the document has been tampered with and is missing the exhibits, etc.
312 2003 11 23 - P010 European Patent Office response to office action filed by Martyn Molyneaux of WILDMAN, HARROLD, ALLEN & DIXON LLP whereby Molyneaux confirms that he filed the fraud charges but instead it appears he filed a fraudulent document without most of the exhibits.
313 2003 11 23 - P010 European Patent Office response to office action filed by Martyn Molyneaux of WILDMAN, HARROLD, ALLEN & DIXON LLP whereby Molyneaux confirms that he filed the fraud charges but instead it appears he filed a fraudulent document without most of the exhibits.
314 2003 11 24 Patent Portfolio of Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman.
315 2003 11 25 Response to Pennsylvania Bar regarding complaints against Schiffrin & Barroway.
316 2003 12 11 Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman writes a letter regarding the missing patent files sent by Foley & Lardner.
317 2003 12 11 Iviewit letter to Florida Judicial Qualification Commission, Brooke Kennerly response Final EIB PSL signed.
318 2003 Letter from Iviewit to Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman regarding the patent matters.
319 2003 10 30 Iviewit response to Virginia Bar letter regarding the bar complaint filed against William J. Dick and Foley & Lardner.
320 2004 01 06 Brian G. Utley declaration for William Dick's Virginia Bar response.  This statement is contradicted by Utley's statements in his own deposition regarding the filing by Dick of stolen patent from Utley's former employer Diamond Turf Equipment, Inc. It is later learned that Christopher Wheeler had set up a company, Premiere Connections, for Utley to house the patents Dick was stealing with Utley from Utley's employer Monte Friedkin.  This again shows a criminal enterprise with a prior history of patent crimes.
321 2004 01 08 - William J. Dick statement to Virginia Bar showing his involvement with Brian G. Utley at Diamond Turf Equipment, Inc. and claims that he filed patents with the United States Patent & Trademark Office which contradicts Utley deposition statements that patents were never filed.  Although these fraudulent statements are exposed to the Virginia Bar they fail to do anything to question Dick regarding these crimes, including falsifying information to the Virginia Bar.
322 2004 01 08 - Foley & Lardner patent portfolio included as part of William J. Dick's Virginia Bar complaint.  This IP docket was later submitted to Harry I Moatz of the United States Patent & Trademark Office whereby Moatz found many inconsistencies with the IP docket versus what was one file.  This leads Moatz to get patents suspended by the Commissioner of Patents.  Although the Virginia Bar was notified of Moatz's actions and the fraudulent IP docket they failed to investigate the matters.
323 2004 01 08 William J. Dick's statement to the Virginia Bar showing that Premiere Connections received patents Dick wrote into Utley's name and sent to his home, inventions of Utley's employer, Premiere Connections turns out to be the company that Christopher Wheeler of Proskauer Rose set up for Brian G. Utley.  Wheeler later lies and perjures himself by saying he never did work for Utley to conceal this company from the Florida Bar action.  Wheeler lies to the Florida Bar that he never did work for Utley and then contradicts himself in deposition, after Utley also contradicts Wheeler's lies.  This ties Utley, Wheeler and Dick together in former theft of patents from Utley's prior employer of which all three fail to disclose this matter to the Iviewit Shareholders or Board.
324 2004 01 09 - Response to Thomas J. Cahill, Chief Counsel, New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee regarding the attorney misconduct complaint against Proskauer Rose, Kenneth Rubenstein, Raymond Joao and Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolf & Schlissel being delayed due to a lost letter he supposedly had sent.  This is right before Iviewit learns that the attorney for Proskauer is a Proskauer partner, in the IP department no less, who just happens to be a member of the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee.  
325 2004 01 09 - Response to Thomas J. Cahill, Chief Counsel, New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee regarding the attorney misconduct complaint against Proskauer Rose, Kenneth Rubenstein, Raymond Joao and Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolf & Schlissel being delayed due to a lost letter he supposedly had sent.  This is right before Iviewit learns that the attorney for Proskauer is a Proskauer partner, in the IP department no less, who just happens to be a member of the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee.  
326 2004 01 09 Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman letter response to Thomas Coester, charging Blakely with crimes and being a conspirator.
327 2004 01 09 Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman letter response to Thomas Coester, charging Blakely with crimes and being a conspirator.
328 2004 01 09 Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman letter response to Thomas Coester, charging Blakely with crimes and being a conspirator.
329 2004 01 13 Department of Justice Antitrust Division Response to Iviewit complaint.  Iviewit does not respond to this as investigations begin at the United States Patent & Trademark Office.  What is most interesting to note is that the DOJ claims that it never approved the MPEGLA LLC licensing scheme that it only issued a business review letter.  This makes MPEGLA LLC claim that the DOJ gave them approval false and misleading and allows them to sell to the public they have DOJ approval for this patent pooling scheme.  What is more interesting is that the DOJ had prior consistently broke up patent pools for violations of antitrust laws.
330 2004 01 13 Department of Justice Antitrust Division Response to Iviewit complaint.  Iviewit does not respond to this as investigations begin at the United States Patent & Trademark Office.  What is most interesting to note is that the DOJ claims that it never approved the MPEGLA LLC licensing scheme that it only issued a business review letter.  This makes MPEGLA LLC claim that the DOJ gave them approval false and misleading and allows them to sell to the public they have DOJ approval for this patent pooling scheme.  What is more interesting is that the DOJ had prior consistently broke up patent pools for violations of antitrust laws.
331 2004 01 20 Eric Montel Turner from The Florida Bar response to not investigate Christopher Clark Wheeler and Turner opines that Proskauer did no patent work for Iviewit having not formally investigated the Wheeler complaint, this is a violation of the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar which precludes Florida Bar from siding with either parties claims without formal investigation.  A bar complaint is filed against Turner for this but the Florida Bar dismisses it without formally docketing or disposing of it, claiming it was an employer/employee matter.  Even that should have been formally docketed and disposed of but it was not.
332 2004 01 20 Eric Montel Turner from The Florida Bar response to not investigate Christopher Clark Wheeler and Turner opines that Proskauer did no patent work for Iviewit having not formally investigated the Wheeler complaint, this is a violation of the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar which precludes Florida Bar from siding with either parties claims without formal investigation.  A bar complaint is filed against Turner for this but the Florida Bar dismisses it without formally docketing or disposing of it, claiming it was an employer/employee matter.  Even that should have been formally docketed and disposed of but it was not.
333 2004 01 21 - William J. Dick of Foley & Lardner's Virginia Bar response whereby Dick claims he filed patents for Brian G. Utley contradicting Utley's deposition statement stating patents were never filed for inventions of his former employer.
334 2004 01 21 - William J. Dick and Foley & Lardner response to his Virginia Bar complaint.  Full of lies.
335 2004 01 25 Iviewit response to Eric Montel Turner of The Florida Bar regarding the failure of the Florida Bar to reopen the Wheeler Complaint and to retract and redact statements regarding Proskauer not having done patent work for Iviewit which is patently false.
336 2004 01 25 Iviewit response to Eric Montel Turner of The Florida Bar regarding the failure of the Florida Bar to reopen the Wheeler Complaint and to retract and redact statements regarding Proskauer not having done patent work for Iviewit which is patently false.
337 2004 01 27 WILDMAN, HARROLD, ALLEN &
DIXON LLP letter stating that Martyn Molyneaux left the firm.
338 2004 01 27 WILDMAN, HARROLD, ALLEN &
DIXON LLP letter stating that Martyn Molyneaux left the firm.
339 2004 01 28 Iviewit response to Eric Montel Turner of The Florida Bar regarding his decision not to reopen the Christopher Clark Wheeler case despite massive evidence against Wheeler.
340 2004 02 02 Eric Montel Turner of the Florida Bar response to Iviewit regarding his stating that he was the final arbiter of Florida Bar complaints and stating that it would be passed to the next highest level of review which he had stated did not exist, trying to get Iviewit to give up and not press the claims with the Florida Bar.
341 2004 02 04 - Iviewit response to Eric Montel Turner response to the Iviewit 2004 02 02 letter.
342 2004 02 04 - Iviewit response to Eric Montel Turner response to the Iviewit 2004 02 02 letter.
343 2004 02 11 - 09 587 026 Filing with the United States Patent & Trademark Office claiming that per the direction of Harry I. Moatz, Director of the Office of Enrollment & Discipline, Iviewit & Crossbow Ventures were seeking the Commissioner of Patents to suspend the Iviewit patents based on evidence of Fraud on the United States Patent & Trademark Office by Iviewit former Intellectual Property attorneys, Kenneth Rubenstein, Proskauer Rose LLP, Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolf & Schlissel, Raymond Anthony Joao, Foley & Lardner, William J. Dick, Douglas Boehm, Steven Becker, Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman, Thomas Coester, Norman Zafman, Farzahd Ahmini, Christopher & Weisberg PA, Krishna Narine, Andrew Barroway, Schiffrin & Barroway and others.  This led to the Commissioner of Patents suspending certain of the Iviewit patent applications into an infinite black hole.  The form also included inventor change forms which have gone wholly unresolved while patents are in black hole at the United States Patent & Trademark Office.'
344 2004 02 14 Eric M. Turner of the Florida Bar 3rd response regarding the Christopher Clark Wheeler and Proskauer Rose LLP complaint.  Turner states that when he told us he was the final arbiter and there was no higher level, which was learned to be false, that he meant the Florida Bar was the highest level and that the Florida Supreme Court would not hear the matter.  This statement is false as the Florida Supreme Court did hear the matter and then declined to hear it???
345 2004 03 02 - Iviewit letter to Stephen Warner of Crossbow Ventures regarding the patent problems and fraud that was going on at Iviewit.
346 2004 03 03 - 09 522 721 Filing with the United States Patent & Trademark Office claiming that per the direction of Harry I. Moatz, Director of the Office of Enrollment & Discipline, Iviewit & Crossbow Ventures were seeking the Commissioner of Patents to suspend the Iviewit patents based on evidence of Fraud on the United States Patent & Trademark Office by Iviewit former Intellectual Property attorneys, Kenneth Rubenstein, Proskauer Rose LLP, Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolf & Schlissel, Raymond Anthony Joao, Foley & Lardner, William J. Dick, Douglas Boehm, Steven Becker, Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman, Thomas Coester, Norman Zafman, Farzahd Ahmini, Christopher & Weisberg PA, Krishna Narine, Andrew Barroway, Schiffrin & Barroway and others.  This led to the Commissioner of Patents suspending certain of the Iviewit patent applications into an infinite black hole.  The form also included inventor change forms which have gone wholly unresolved while patents are in black hole at the United States Patent & Trademark Office.
347 2004 03 03 Crossbow Ventures CEO Stephen J. Warner signs statement to patent office that fraud was committed by the attorneys against Iviewit and Crossbow Ventures and where 2/3 of the Crossbow Venture funds were Small Business Administration SBIC loans, this makes this fraud against the SBA and the USPTO.  Oy Vey.
348 2004 03 04 - 09 522 721 Filing with the United States Patent & Trademark Office claiming that per the direction of Harry I. Moatz, Director of the Office of Enrollment & Discipline, Iviewit & Crossbow Ventures were seeking the Commissioner of Patents to suspend the Iviewit patents based on evidence of Fraud on the United States Patent & Trademark Office by Iviewit former Intellectual Property attorneys, Kenneth Rubenstein, Proskauer Rose LLP, Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolf & Schlissel, Raymond Anthony Joao, Foley & Lardner, William J. Dick, Douglas Boehm, Steven Becker, Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman, Thomas Coester, Norman Zafman, Farzahd Ahmini, Christopher & Weisberg PA, Krishna Narine, Andrew Barroway, Schiffrin & Barroway and others.  This led to the Commissioner of Patents suspending certain of the Iviewit patent applications into an infinite black hole.  The form also included inventor change forms which have gone wholly unresolved while patents are in black hole at the United States Patent & Trademark Office.
349 2004 03 04 - 09 587 026 Filing with the United States Patent & Trademark Office claiming that per the direction of Harry I. Moatz, Director of the Office of Enrollment & Discipline, Iviewit & Crossbow Ventures were seeking the Commissioner of Patents to suspend the Iviewit patents based on evidence of Fraud on the United States Patent & Trademark Office by Iviewit former Intellectual Property attorneys, Kenneth Rubenstein, Proskauer Rose LLP, Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolf & Schlissel, Raymond Anthony Joao, Foley & Lardner, William J. Dick, Douglas Boehm, Steven Becker, Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman, Thomas Coester, Norman Zafman, Farzahd Ahmini, Christopher & Weisberg PA, Krishna Narine, Andrew Barroway, Schiffrin & Barroway and others.  This led to the Commissioner of Patents suspending certain of the Iviewit patent applications into an infinite black hole.  The form also included inventor change forms which have gone wholly unresolved while patents are in black hole at the United States Patent & Trademark Office.
350 2004 03 04 - 09 630 939 - 2004 03 04 United States Patent & Trademark Commissioner approval of request for suspension while investigations are pending into Iviewit claims that their attorneys committed both fraud on the USPTO and fraud on Iviewit.  Patents remain in limbo.
351 2004 03 05 Eric Montel Turner of The Florida Bar letter stating he had turned the review over to the chair, notice his failure to capitalize the undefined term chair, as if his chair was reviewing the matters, this becomes hysterical in next letters.
352 2004 03 12 Iviewit response to Virginia Bar decision regarding William J. Dick and Foley & Lardner showing that the patents were suspended based on charges that Dick was involved in fraud on the United States Patent & Trademark Office and fraud on Iviewit and to reopen his case in light of this new and damaging evidence.  Also, the IP docket submitted by Dick in his response to the Virginia Bar was found by the USPTO to be fraught with fraud.  Yet, Virginia Bar held fast on their decisions despite compelling evidence to investigate.
353 2004 03 16 - AICPA letter regarding the complaint against Gerald Lewin, Goldstein & Lewin Co. and Erika Lewin seeking more information.  This investigation is then derailed by a new investigator who claims the AICPA does not have funds to investigate and that we should go to the Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation, where Lewin slips out of that complaint, again appearing a total denial of due process.
354 2004 03 17 Iviewit letter to Special Agent Stephen Lucchesi of the Federal Bureau of Investigation in West Palm Beach Florida requesting investigation of the Iviewit matters.
355 Filing with the United States Patent & Trademark Office claiming that per the direction of Harry I. Moatz, Director of the Office of Enrollment & Discipline, Iviewit & Crossbow Ventures were seeking the Commissioner of Patents to suspend the Iviewit patents based on evidence of Fraud on the United States Patent & Trademark Office by Iviewit former Intellectual Property attorneys, Kenneth Rubenstein, Proskauer Rose LLP, Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolf & Schlissel, Raymond Anthony Joao, Foley & Lardner, William J. Dick, Douglas Boehm, Steven Becker, Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman, Thomas Coester, Norman Zafman, Farzahd Ahmini, Christopher & Weisberg PA, Krishna Narine, Andrew Barroway, Schiffrin & Barroway and others.  This led to the Commissioner of Patents suspending certain of the Iviewit patent applications into an infinite black hole.  The form also included inventor change forms which have gone wholly unresolved while patents are in black hole at the United States Patent & Trademark Office.'
356 2004 03 22 Portfolio Compilation Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolf & Schlissel, Foley & Lardner & Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman which shows inconsistencies between the firms on the patent owners, inventors and assignees.
357 2004 03 22 William J. Dick Virginia Bar Iviewit rebuttal 2,881 pages of great evidence for the IP crimes.
358 2004 03 23 Letter to Shareholders showing Iviewit is being billed for Utley patents, the billings appear to be fraudulent and to attempt to justify the Utley patents once they were discovered, nice try at a cover up.
359 2004 03 23 United States Patent & Trademark Office correspondence showing that the Utley patents are not the property of Iviewit, the inventors are not the Iviewit inventors and the owners and assignees are not the Iviewit Companies.
360 2004 03 23 United States Patent & Trademark Office correspondence showing that the Utley patents are not the property of Iviewit, the inventors are not the Iviewit inventors and the owners and assignees are not the Iviewit Companies.
361 2004 03 23 United States Patent & Trademark Office correspondence showing that the Utley patents are not the property of Iviewit, the inventors are not the Iviewit inventors and the owners and assignees are not the Iviewit Companies.
362 2004 03 25 Patent Portfolio prepared by Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman and reviewed by Weider of the United States Patent & Trademark Office whereby it was found there appeared a mass of fraud and this led to Commissioner of Patents suspending the IP.
363 2004 03 25 Patent Portfolio prepared by Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman and reviewed by Weider of the United States Patent & Trademark Office whereby it was found there appeared a mass of fraud and this led to Commissioner of Patents suspending the IP.
364 2004 03 26 Moatz letter to take time responding for complaint.
365 2004 03 29 United States Patent & Trademark Office Commissioner suspends Iviewit patents based on allegations of fraud on the USPTO and Iviewit.
366 2004 03 29 United States Patent & Trademark Office Commissioner suspends Iviewit patents based on allegations of fraud on the USPTO and Iviewit.
367 2004 03 29 Withdrawal of attorneys Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman and Foley & Lardner.
368 2004 03 30 Corporate formation chart based on evidence recovered from Iviewit files and files from Proskauer Rose copied in Proskauer v. Iviewit case, showing a litany of corporations and name changes.  This excersize was preformed after learning from the United States Patent & Trademark Office - Harry I. Moatz, that patents had been assigned to companies they should not have been assigned too.
369 2004 04 03 - 09 587 730  - 2004 04 03 United States Patent & Trademark Office approval of Request for Suspension of the patent based on allegations of fraud on the United States Patent & Trademark Office by Iviewit patent attorneys.  This letter was also sent to the accused to notify them of the liability and for them to report such to their liability carriers.
370 2004 04 19 - 09 587 026 - 57103-115 2004 04 19 United States Patent & Trademark Office approval of Request for Suspension of the patent based on allegations of fraud on the United States Patent & Trademark Office by Iviewit patent attorneys.
371 2004 04 21 Letter to Iviewit Shareholders and Directors regarding the fraud uncovered at the United States Patent & Trademark Office and the corporate fraud discovered. 
372 2004 04 21 Letter to Iviewit Shareholders and Directors regarding the fraud uncovered at the United States Patent & Trademark Office and the corporate fraud discovered. 
373 2004 04 29 Chart prepared to explain as best as possible on the limited evidence at the time how the patent and corporate scheme was presumed to have occurred. 
374 2004 04 30 Director and Officers Meeting Agenda.
375 2004 04 30 Director and Officers Meeting Agenda.
376 2004 04 30 Response to AICPA request for more information regarding complaints against Gerald R. Lewin, Erika Lewin and Goldstein Lewin & Co. CPA's
377 2004 04 30 Response to AICPA request for more information regarding complaints against Gerald R. Lewin, Erika Lewin and Goldstein Lewin & Co. CPA's
378 2004 04 30 Teleconference Minutes from Directors and Officers meeting regarding the fraud discovered.
379 2004 04 21 Letter to Iviewit Shareholders and Directors regarding the fraud uncovered at the United States Patent & Trademark Office and the corporate fraud discovered. 
380 2004 05 01 Iviewit letters to former Officers and Directors regarding the information uncovered at the United States Patent & Trademark Office and regarding the corporate fraud and other crimes.  This question set was for Gerald Lewin of Goldstein & Lewin Co.
381 2004 05 02 Minutes of meeting with former Board and Officers.
382 2004 05 02 Teleconference Minutes of Board meeting.
383 2004 05 13 Iviewit letters to former Officers and Directors regarding the information uncovered at the United States Patent & Trademark Office and regarding the corporate fraud and other crimes.  This question set was for Christopher Clark Wheeler of Proskauer Rose LLP.
384 2004 05 19 Complaint filed against Steven C. Krane and Proskauer Rose LLP at the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee to strike the conflicted response of Krane who violated his public office positions in representing his firm and partner Kenneth Rubenstein in their bar complaints.  
385 2004 05 19 Complaint filed against Steven C. Krane and Proskauer Rose LLP at the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee with Thomas Cahill to strike the conflicted response of Krane who violated his public office positions in representing his firm and partner Kenneth Rubenstein in their bar complaints. 
386 2004 05 19 Iviewit letter to the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee to strike the conflicted response of Steven C. Krane of Proskauer in the Kenneth Rubenstein and Proskauer Rose LLP complaint filed and a formal request for investigation of Krane for such violations of his public offices.
387 2004 05 20 Iviewit letter to the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee to strike the conflicted response of Steven C. Krane of Proskauer in the Kenneth Rubenstein and Proskauer Rose LLP complaint filed and a formal request for investigation of Krane for such violations of his public offices.
389 2004 05 21 Eric Montel Turner of the Florida Bar's response to the Iviewit petition to the Florida Supreme Court, note the illiteracy rate in the response that makes it impossible to determine what exactly he is saying.
390 2004 05 21 Eric Montel Turner of the Florida Bar's response to the Iviewit petition to the Florida Supreme Court, note the illiteracy rate in the response that makes it impossible to determine what exactly he is saying.
391 2004 05 21 Steven C. Krane of Proskauer Rose response to the complaint filed against him and requesting that his responses be stricken from the Rubenstein complaint.  Krane fails to disclose his roles at both the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee and The New York State Bar which both preclude him from handling complaints against his firm and partner, especially where he has personal and professional interests.  The infamous Krane suicide note.
392 2004 05 21 Iviewit letters to former Officers and Directors regarding the information uncovered at the United States Patent & Trademark Office and regarding the corporate fraud and other crimes.  This question set was for Kenneth Rubenstein of Proskauer Rose LLP and MPEGLA LLC.
393 2004 05 24 Eric Turner of The Florida Bar letter telling Iviewit to put everything in writing to avoid misunderstandings.
394 2004 05 24 Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee letter to strike the responses of Steven C. Krane of Proskaeur Rose for conflicts of interest and violations of public offices.
395 2004 05 25 Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee letter to strike the responses of Steven C. Krane of Proskaeur Rose for conflicts of interest and violations of public officesSupreme Court Strike Response of Steven Krane for Conflict of Interest & Violation of Public Offices.
396 2004 05 26 - Iviewit response to Steven C. Krane letter dated May 21, 2004 asking the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee's, Chief Counsel, Thomas Cahill to strike all Krane responses and pointing out his roles at the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee and NYSBA and other ethics departments that all made his representations violations of his public offices. 
397 2004 05 26 Biography of Steven C. Krane showing conflicting roles at Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee, the NYSBA and other ethics departments that would have precluded him from representing his Proskauer partner Rubenstein, his firm Proskauer and himself.
398 2004 05 26 - Iviewit response to Steven C. Krane letter dated May 21, 2004 asking the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee's, Chief Counsel, Thomas Cahill to strike all Krane responses and pointing out his roles at the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee and NYSBA and other ethics departments that all made his representations violations of his public offices. 
399 2004 05 26 Iviewit letter to Foley & Lardner
400 2004 05 27 - Eric Turner Response to letter dated 2004 05 21
401 2004 05 27 - Iviewit Letter to Eric Turner of The Florida Bar letter dated May 21, 2004.
402 2004 06 01 - Eric Turner of The Florida Bar regarding the process for elevating the Christopher Clark Wheeler Florida Bar complaint.  This comes after Turner tried to claim he was the final arbiter for The Florida Bar.
403 2004 06 01 - Eric Turner of The Florida Bar regarding the process for elevating the Christopher Clark Wheeler Florida Bar complaint.  This comes after Turner tried to claim he was the final arbiter for The Florida Bar.
404 2004 06 02 - Iviewit letter to Eric Turner of The Florida Bar.
405 2004 06 06 The Florida Bar taped call regarding confirming that Matthew Triggs of Proskauer had a role with a Florida Bar Grievance Committee within the year which precluded him from representing any party for a period of one year, especially his partner and his law firm, especially where he had personal and professional interests in the outcome and finally where he was representing Proskauer simultaneously in the Proskauer v. Iviewit lawsuit.
406 2004 06 14 Japanese Office Action.
407 2004 06 17 Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee's, Chief Counsel, Thomas Cahill's Motion to move the complaints of Steven C. Krane, Proskauer and Kenneth Rubenstein for what he claims to avoid the appearance of impropriety when in fact he knew that Krane had violated his public office.  Iviewit had contacted Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe of the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department who informed Iviewit that despite Cahill's initial denial that Krane had any roles with the department, that she was having a meeting with both Cahill and Krane on a Committee at the department.  Holy cow Batman, their busted.  Cahill writes this biased letter after learning that a complaint was filed against him and it is wholly misleading of the facts.
408 2004 06 23 - Paul J. Curran, Chairman of the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee moving the complaint filed against Thomas J. Cahill for investigation according to department rules.  A complaint was filed against Thomas J. Cahill for his involvement with lying about Steven C. Krane's conflicts and violations of public offices.
409 2004 06 23 Iviewit faxs the disciplinary complaint filed against Thomas J. Cahill to Paul J. Curran for investigation.
410 2004 06 23 Cahill Petition.
411 2004 06 24 Iviewit letter to Eric Turner of the Florida Bar demanding information regarding the positions of Matthew Triggs, Christopher Clark Wheeler and Spencer Sax of Sax Sachs & Klien to determine further violations of public offices revealed by the Triggs violation of public offices and noticing him that Iviewit would be petitioning the Florida Supreme Court.
415 2004 06 29 - Complaint against Steven C. Krane of Proskauer Rose sent to Paul J. Curran, Chairman of the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee.
416 2004 06 30 The Florida Bar complaint against Eric Montel Turner for his violations of his Florida Bar public office position.
417 2004 06 30 The Florida Bar's President, Kelly Overstreet Johnson, accepting Iviewit complaint letters but fails to disclose her conflicts.  Johnson was conflicted with the Wheeler complaint as she worked at the Florida law firm of Broad & Cassel with Wheeler's brother, James Wheeler and failed to disclose such while taking complaint information in.
418 2004 06 30 Christopher Clark Wheeler biography showing his false claims of Florida Bar positions, which is a violation of attorney conduct rules of Florida, this forms the base for yet another complaint against Wheeler for false advertising.
419 2004 07 01 Debroah Yarbrough, a clerk for the Florida Supreme Court fax cover telling her the Florida Bar intended on destroying files and hiding the case so it could not be sent to the Florida Supreme Court.  
420 2004 07 01 Eric Turner Complaint Against Eric Turner The Florida Bar
421 2004 07 01 Eric M. Turner formal Florida Bar complaint, sent to Turner.
423 2004 07 01 Florida Supreme Court Case SC04-1078 - Acknowledgement of New Case and Stricken Due to Petitioner Not A Member of The Florida Bar Representing A Corporation.  
424 2004 07 01 Iviewit fax of a Petition for the Florida Supreme Court regarding the Florida Bar crimes being committed by its members.
425 2004 07 01 Letter to Debbie Yarbrough of the Florida Supreme Court regarding the Florida Bar's half truth on the file destruction of the Christopher Clark Wheeler bar complaint.
426 2004 07 01 Debroah Yarbrough of the Florida Supreme Court's message regarding Kenneth Marvin of The Florida Bar's misleading Yarbrough, stating The Florida Bar would return the files to Iviewit.  Marvin fails to state that The Florida Bar would destroy their work product that was necessary to evaluate the confirmed violation of public office by Matthew Triggs for prosecution.
427 2004 07 02 Kenneth Marvin of The Florida Bar letter regarding the Eric Montel Turner Florida Bar complaint, stating that the Turner violations of his public office were employer/employee matters and that he would not docket or process the formal filed complaint.  This is inapposite of Florida Constitution and The Rules Regulating the Florida Bar.
428 2004 07 06 Iviewit Petition to the Florida Supreme Court regarding the Christopher C. Wheeler bar complaint, the Matthew Triggs complaint and the Eric M. Turner complaint.  FINAL NOTARIZED
429 2004 07 08 Iviewit Motion to the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department regarding the Cahill complaint.
430 2004 07 08 Iviewit Motion to the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department regarding the conflicts and violations of public offices of Kenneth Rubenstein, Proskauer Rose, Steven C. Krane, Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolf & Schlissel and Raymond A. Joao and requesting immediate investigation and to move the complaints.
431 2004 07 09 The Florida Bar's counsel John Anthony Boggs letter confirming the violation of public office by Matthew Triggs of Proskauer in the handling of his Proskauer Partner Wheeler and his firm Proskauer.  Boggs then tries to cite law that was only proposed as a defense of Wheeler and states shoulda coulda woulda logic in attempts to justify the violation. Funny that the Florida Bar is acting like Wheeler's personal defense.
432 2004 07 09 The Florida Bar's counsel John Anthony Boggs letter confirming the violation of public office by Matthew Triggs of Proskauer in the handling of his Proskauer Partner Wheeler and his firm Proskauer.  Boggs then tries to cite law that was only proposed as a defense of Wheeler and states shoulda coulda woulda logic in attempts to justify the violation. Funny that the Florida Bar is acting like Wheeler's personal defense.
433 2004 07 12 Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee's, Chief Counsel, Thomas Cahill's Motion to move the complaints of Steven C. Krane and Proskauer, note this comes after Cahill has a filed complaint against him, making this further reason for another complaint against him.
434 2004 07 12 Florida Supreme Court Iviewit docket update.
435 2004 07 13 Iviewit's second bar complaint against Christopher Clark Wheeler of Proskauer Rose, this goes undocketed and never gets resolved, inapposite The Rules Regulating The Florida Bar and against the Florida Constitution.
436 2004 07 15 - American Internation Group "AIG" Directors and Officers policy internal affairs letter regarding fraud on AIG committed by Proskauer Rose.
437 2004 07 15 - American Internation Group "AIG" Directors and Officers policy internal affairs letter regarding fraud on AIG committed by Proskauer Rose.
439 2004 07 22 John A. Boggs of The Florida Bar receipt of Matthew Triggs bar complaint which was never formally docketed or given procedural due process, inapposite The Rules Regulating The Florida Bar and the Florida Constitution.
440 2004 07 22 Kelly O. Johnson, President, The Florida Bar, receipt of the Matthew Triggs of Proskauer's bar complaint.  Johnson recieves complaint information on Wheeler failing to disclose she works for Wheeler's brother James Wheeler at Broad & Cassel, a small law firm in Florida.  
441 2004 07 22 Matthew Triggs bar complaint at The Florida Bar.  The complaint was never docketed or procedurally disposed of, inapposite The Rules Regulating The Florida Bar and the Florida Constitution.
442 2004 07 22 Matthew Triggs bar complaint at The Florida Bar.  The complaint was never docketed or procedurally disposed of, inapposite The Rules Regulating The Florida Bar and the Florida Constitution. BOOKMARKED
443 2004 07 23 Florida Supreme Court ruling that Iviewit cannot be represented Pro Se, forcing the complaint to be re-filed by Lamont and Bernstein on behalf of the Iviewit Shareholders.  Although Florida pulled this trick, the New York Supreme Court did not and allowed Iviewit to be represented by Lamont and Bernstein acting Pro Se.
444 2004 07 23 - The Affirmed Amended Petition for: Injunctive Relief; Declaratory Relief; Begin Immediate Investigation of Complaint Against Christopher C. Wheeler; and Move Complaints to the Next Highest Level of Review, Void of Conflict of Interest and Appearance Of Impropriety declined based on Pro Se representation of a corporation.  
445 2004 07 26 Iviewit letter to Harry I. Moatz of the United States Patent & Trademark Office regarding failure of patent agents Moatz assigned to return calls regarding upcoming patent suspension deadlines and asking that he request another twelve months of suspension.
446 2004 07 28 Iviewit response to letter of John A. Boggs of The Florida Bar regarding the complaints of Christopher C. Wheeler of Proskauer, Matthew Triggs of Proskauer and Eric Montel Turner of The Florida Bar and his attempts to obfuscate his duties and other matters of interest.
447 2004 07 28 Cahill to move Krane.
448 2004 07 28 Crossbow Ventures signs alongside Iviewit inventors with the United States Patent & Trademark Office charges of Fraud on the Patent Office and requests to change inventors to the Iviewit inventors.
449 2004 07 28 Iviewit Amended Petition to the Florida Supreme Court Docket #SC04-1078 regarding the crimes committed at The Florida Bar.
450 2004 07 28 Iviewit Amended Petition to the Florida Supreme Court Docket #SC04-1078 regarding the crimes committed at The Florida Bar.
451 2004 07 28 Iviewit Amended Petition to the Florida Supreme Court Docket #SC04-1078 regarding the crimes committed at The Florida Bar.
452 2004 07 28 Iviewit response to John Anthony Boggs of The Florida Bar's letter confirming Matthew Triggs of Proskauer violation of The Rules Regulating The Florida Bar, a violation of his Supreme Court public office position.  To note Kelly Overstreet Johnson was copied on this and accepts the document while failing to disclose that she has a major conflict in that she works directly for Christopher Wheeler's brother, James Wheeler at a small Florida law firm Broad & Cassel.
453 2004 07 28 Iviewit request to the Commissioner of Patents to suspend ALL patents and trademarks of Iviewit's for 12 more months.
454 2004 07 29 - Supreme Court of Florida Ruling that the style of the Florida Supreme Court case has been changed from Iviewit Holdings, Inc. v. The Florida Bar to Eliot Bernstein, et. al versus The Florida Bar
455 2004 07 29 Florida Supreme Court Case #SCO4-1078 Ruling that The Florida Bar must halt the planned destruction of the Iviewit bar complaints against Christopher Clark Wheeler of Proskauer.  Although they halted this, when they decided to abandon the case, the only Order they gave was in favor of The Florida Bar to destroy the evidence, inapposite Florida record retention laws. 
456 2004 07 29 Florida Supreme Court Case #SCO4-1078 Ruling that The Florida Bar must halt the planned destruction of the Iviewit bar complaints against Christopher Clark Wheeler of Proskauer.  Although they halted this, when they decided to abandon the case, the only Order they gave was in favor of The Florida Bar to destroy the evidence, inapposite Florida record retention laws. 
457 2004 07 29 Debroah Yarborough, clerk of the Florida Supreme Court message regarding the ruling that The Florida Bar halt destruction of the Iviewit bar complaints at The Florida Bar message.
458 2004 08 03 The Florida Bar counsel Eric M. Turner letter trying to explain why the Matthew Triggs complaint for violations of his public office position with The Florida Bar is not being docketed due to its being faxed.   The complaint was then mailed but still The Florida Bar never docketed the case.  It is remarkable that with a complaint lodged against him in the matters, Turner was allowed to continue acting in the matters.
459 2004 08 09 Japanese Patent Office investigation letter.  Very interesting in that the JPO tries to claim that there is no such thing as fraud in Japan???
460 2004 08 11 Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department Orders the complaints against Kenneth Rubenstein, Proskauer, Raymond Joao, Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolf & Schlissel and Steven C. Krane to be moved for immediate investigation due to the appearance of impropriety and conflicts.  The case was then transferred to the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division Second Department where further conflicts with Krane were discovered that derailed the investigation and caused a flurry of further complaints against the Second Department members.
461 2004 08 11 Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department Orders the complaints against Kenneth Rubenstein, Proskauer, Raymond Joao, Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolf & Schlissel and Steven C. Krane to be moved for immediate investigation due to the appearance of impropriety and conflicts.  The case was then transferred to the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division Second Department where further conflicts with Krane were discovered that derailed the investigation and caused a flurry of further complaints against the Second Department members.
462 2004 08 19 Iviewit letter to Andrew H. Goodman of the Virginia Bar regarding the William J. Dick bar complaint and noticing the Virginia Bar of conflicts and violations of public offices found in new York and Florida regarding those investigations.  Information from the Florida Bar and the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee was used in Dick's defense of the bar complaint.  This should have caused at minimum review of the Dick matters.
463 2004 08 23 Iviewit letter to the FBI Special Agent Stephen Lucchesi regarding his taking the matters to the US Attorney.
464 2004 08 25 Iviewit letter to Andrew H. Goodman of the Virginia Bar regarding the William J. Dick bar complaint and noticing the Virginia Bar of conflicts and violations of public offices found in new York and Florida regarding those investigations.  Information from the Florida Bar and the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee was used in Dick's defense of the bar complaint.  This should have caused at minimum review of the Dick matters.
465 2004 08 27 Patent Office correspondence.
466 2004 09 07  Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee's, Chief Counsel, Thomas Cahill's cover letter transferring the complaints of Steven C. Krane, Proskauer, Kenneth Rubenstein, Raymond Joao & Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolf & Schlissel due to the unanimous decision by five justices of the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department.  Very interesting that Cahill handles this as he is part of an ongoing investigation for his part in the crimes at the court and thus acts in conflict and violation of his public office.  What is damning is that Cahill tries to impart to the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division Second Department that they are do as they please with the cases, which is not what the justices ordered, they ordered IMMEDIATE INVESTIGATION, yet Cahill tries to help himself and his buddies out of the mess again.
467 2004 09 08 NEWS ARTICLE - Sony release a zoom TV.
468 2004 09 09 Steven C. Krane of Proskauer Rose, after being implicated for conflicts and violations of his Supreme Court and other public office positions violations starts working on a new biography of himself cutting what is implicating from his past as if it would disappear from his cover up.  This is as funny as the picture of Krane at the Proskauer website where he replaces the picture where he weighs about 500 pounds with one from years earlier before he engorged himself in greed.  You can run but you cannot hide Mr. Unethical.
469 2004 09 11 Iviewit files with LAWYERS FUND FOR CLIENT
PROTECTION OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK.
470 2004 09 07  Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee's, Chief Counsel, Thomas Cahill's cover letter transferring the complaints of Steven C. Krane, Proskauer, Kenneth Rubenstein, Raymond Joao & Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolf & Schlissel due to the unanimous decision by five justices of the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department.  Very interesting that Cahill handles this as he is part of an ongoing investigation for his part in the crimes at the court and thus acts in conflict and violation of his public office.  What is damning is that Cahill tries to impart to the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division Second Department that they are do as they please with the cases, which is not what the justices ordered, they ordered IMMEDIATE INVESTIGATION, yet Cahill tries to help himself and his buddies out of the mess again.
471 2004 09 21 Iviewit letter to Andrew Goodman of the Virginia Bar regarding William Dick of Foley & Lardner bar complaint, noticing the VA bar of the violations of public offices found in New York and Florida in the related attorney complaints of Christopher Clark Wheeler, Kenneth Rubenstein, Raymond Joao, Steven C. Krane and Matthew Triggs.
472 2004 09 22 United States Patent & Trademark Office second six month Suspension Notice.  Note that the USPTO claims they are being suspended pending investigation into the inventor and other issues presented.  The patents remain in limbo.
474 2004 10 05 Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division Second Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee's, Chief Counsel, Diana Maxfield Kearse trying to get Steven C. Krane, Proskauer, Kenneth Rubenstein and Raymond Joao out of the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department Court ORDER for immediate investigation by claiming she reviewed and found no evidence of misconduct.  This decision despite that she was ordered to investigate by five justice who reviewed the materials and found reason to Order investigations.  No of the accused had to put a defense up, no witnesses were contacted, no evidence tested and then Kearse admits that she is conflicted with Krane but refuses to answer questions regarding her conflict and tells Iviewit to put any request for that information in writing.  Kearse is charged with a complaint for her undisclosed conflicts after she fails to respond to the written request for disclosure of her conflicts with both Krane and Judge Judith Kaye.
475 2004 10 07 Iviewit Petition to the Florida Supreme Court requesting intervention in the Boca Raton Police Department investigation and the FBI investigation as they tried to set up a fake meeting with members of the SEC and this caused grave concerns that it was to intimidate inventor Bernstein to drop his charges against the Boca PD regarding their failure to investigate and possible internal corruptions.
476 2004 10 08 Taped Florida Bar message confirming Matthew Triggs of Proskauer's dates of service with The Florida Bar.  This confirms that Triggs acted in violation of his public office when he represented Christopher C. Wheeler in his Florida Bar complaint.  
477 2004 10 08 Florida Supreme Court SC104 1078  Iviewit Petition to the Florida Supreme Court requesting intervention in the Boca Raton Police Department investigation and the FBI investigation as they tried to set up a fake meeting with members of the SEC and this caused grave concerns that it was to intimidate inventor Bernstein to drop his charges against the Boca PD regarding their failure to investigate and possible internal corruptions.
478 2004 10 08 Taped Florida Bar message confirming Matthew Triggs of Proskauer's dates of service with The Florida Bar.  This confirms that Triggs acted in violation of his public office when he represented Christopher C. Wheeler in his Florida Bar complaint.  
479 2004 10 10 Letter from David White of the European Patent Office regarding starting investigations with the legal department.
480 2004 10 11 Florida Supreme Court Ruling in Case #SCO4-1078 that the Florida Bar is to respond to the Iviewit Petition.  This despite Eric Montel Turner's prior claims that the Florida Supreme Court would not be able to review the matters as The Florida Bar was the final arbiter.
481 2004 10 13 - Iviewit Florida Supreme Court case docket #SC104-1078 Update Docket cert
482 2004 10 13 AIG D&O letter, stating they are investigating the matters.
483 2004 10 15 Florida Supreme Court Denial of Motion for protective custody and to over sight investigations at the FBI and Boca Raton PD for failure to invoke courts jurisdiction.
484 2004 10 15 Florida Supreme Court Denial of Motion for Declaratory Relief; Intervene in Third Party Investigations of the Boca Raton Police Department, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the Securities and Exchange Commission with the Courts oversight to ensure due process and an emergency order for the Immediate Protective Custody of Eliot I. Bernstein, Candice M. Bernstein, Joshua EZ Bernstein, Jacob NA Bernstein, Daniel EAO Bernstein, P. Stephen Lamont & P. Stephen Lamont II - Failure to Invoke Court Jurisdiction
486 2004 10 15 United States Patent & Trademark Office correspondence regarding suspensions.
487 2004 10 18 Iviewit letter to Martin Gold and Paul Curran to move the complaint of Thomas J. Cahill from the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee to a non conflicted third party, based on the Court Order for investigation of Kenneth Rubenstein, Proskauer Rose, Steven C. Krane and Raymond Joao due to conflicts and the appearance of impropriety.
488 2004 10 18 Kelly Overstreet Johnson, President of The Florida Bar read receipt on Service of the Florida Supreme Court petition.  Johnson fails to disclose at this time or previously that she has conflict with Christopher C. Wheeler's brother, James Wheeler of Broad & Cassel, as she works for him at the law firm.
489 2004 10 20 AIG POLICY 872-99-99 showing Brian G. Utley committed fraud on the application and that the policy is issued on a non-existent company.
490 2004 10 20 AIG POLICY 872-99-99 showing Brian G. Utley committed fraud on the application and that the policy is issued on a non-existent company.
491 2004 10 22 Eric Turner of The Florida Bar response to the Iviewit Petition filed with the Florida Supreme Court.  There are no comments on this document but try to pick out the numerous grammatical errors for fun.  The response addresses none of the issues in the filed Petition and thus Iviewit moves for a default judgement.
492 2004 10 22 Eric Turner of The Florida Bar response to the Iviewit Petition filed with the Florida Supreme Court.  There are comments on this document showing the illiteracy of the response.  The response addresses none of the issues in the filed Petition and thus Iviewit moves for a default judgement.
494 2004 10 22 Florida Bar to Supreme Court eib comments
495 2004 10 25 Petition Response 09 522 721.zip
496 2004 10 26 Iviewit letter response to Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division Second Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee's, Chief Counsel, Diana Maxfield Kearse, rebutting her decision in spite of the Court Order for investigation, to dismiss the complaints against Kenneth Rubenstein, Proskauer Rose, Steven C. Krane, Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolf & Schlissel and Raymond Joao on review, not investigation.  The letter also asks Kearse to disclose the conflicts she had with Krane and Judge Judith Kaye in writing as she requested. 
497 2004 10 26 Iviewit letter response to Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division Second Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee's, Chief Counsel, Diana Maxfield Kearse, rebutting her decision in spite of the Court Order for investigation, to dismiss the complaints against Kenneth Rubenstein, Proskauer Rose, Steven C. Krane, Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolf & Schlissel and Raymond Joao on review, not investigation.  The letter also asks Kearse to disclose the conflicts she had with Krane and Judge Judith Kaye in writing as she requested. 
498 2004 10 26 St Paul Insurance Company investigation letter written by law firm Garcia & Stallone regarding Raymond A. Joao fraud issues.
499 2004 11 04 Florida Department of Professional Regulation letter requesting more information regarding the complaints filed against Gerald Lewin, Erika Lewin and Goldstein Lewin & Co. CPA's.  Iviewit was forced to take complaints here as the AICPA suddenly in the middle of investigation terminated their investigation stating they had no money and told Iviewit to take the complaints to the DPR who later dismissed the complaints, wonder how much this cost.
500 2004 11 04 Iviewit filed with Florida Supreme Court a Motion to Extend Response SC04-1078.
501 2004 11 09 - Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division Second Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee's, Chief Counsel, Diana Maxfield Kearse, stating that a committee member would review if the complaints ordered for investigation by the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department justices would be reopened for investigation, note no investigation was ever done but later as they get deeper in their bs, they try to state that the review was an investigation and thus they complied with the First Department order.
503 2004 11 10 - Florida Supreme Court - Grant Extension of Time
504 2004 11 11 Florida Supreme Court Case #SC04-1078 Iviewit response to The Florida Bar response to the Iviewit Petition filed.  
505 2004 11 15 Florida Supreme Court Case #SC04-1078 Iviewit response to The Florida Bar response to the Iviewit Petition filed.  
506 2004 11 15 Florida Supreme Court Case #SC04-1078 Iviewit response to The Florida Bar response to the Iviewit Petition filed.  
507 2004 11 15 Florida Supreme Court Case #SC04-1078 Iviewit response to The Florida Bar response to the Iviewit Petition filed.  CERT
508 2004 11 22 Iviewit letter response to Garcia and Stallone in regard to the fraud exposed with their client Raymond A. Joao whose is covered by St. Paul Insurance.  Letter notifies them that Joao was ordered for investigation by the First Department which he failed to disclose to St. Paul.  
509 2004 11 25 European Patent Office letter response to letters exposing them to fraud on the USPTO and Iviewit.
510 2004 11 30 08-59 THE STATE OF NEW YORK COURT OF APPEALS PSL G.
512 2004 12 15 Delray Beach Florida Drunk Driving Arrest Report for Felony DUI with injury against Christopher Clark Wheeler of Proskauer Rose.  You gotta read what his wife says, go Deanna!!!
513 2004 12 15 Delray Beach Florida Drunk Driving Arrest Report for Felony DUI with injury against Christopher Clark Wheeler of Proskauer Rose.  You gotta read what his wife says, go Deanna!!!
514 2004 12 20 Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division Second Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee's, Chairman, Lawrence DiGiovanna's review of Kearse decision and siding with her decision to not investigate and dismiss based on review, despite the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department court Order to investigate, not review.  For his part in obfuscating justice a complaint is filed against both Kearse and DiGiovanna which both go undocketed and procedurally are derailed by Kearse who even handles the complaint against herself???
515 2004 12 22 United States Patent & Trademark Office letter to James Groody regarding the patent suspensions.
516 2004 12 24 Stephen Kaye of Proskauer Rose biography, yes this is the husband of Judge Judith Kaye, whose former law clerk was Steven Krane, partner with Stephen Kaye at Proskauer in the Intellectual Property group that was formed immediately after Proskauer took disclosures of the Iviewit inventions, then ran out and hired Rubenstein with his MPEGLA pools to steal the Iviewit inventions.  Here we finally see how the denial of due process in New York was being effectuated and how the crimes were going uninvestigated and were derailed.
517 2004 12 24  Steven C. Krane of Proskauer Rose, after being implicated for conflicts and violations of his Supreme Court and other public office positions violations starts working on a new biography of himself cutting what is implicating from his past as if it would disappear from his cover up.  This is as funny as the picture of Krane at the Proskauer website where he replaces the picture where he weighs about 500 pounds with one from years earlier before he engorged himself in greed.  You can run but you cannot hide Mr. Unethical.
518 2005 01 10 Iviewit letter response to 2004 12 20 Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division Second Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee's, Chairman, Lawrence DiGiovanna's review of Kearse decision to not investigate inapposite of the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department order to investigate and other issues regarding conflicts with Steven C. Krane and Chief Judge Judith Kaye.
519 2005 01 12 - Florida Supreme Court Petition For All Writs Jurisdiction filed by Iviewit is denied and allows the Florida Bar to destroy the Iviewit complaint against Christopher Clark Wheeler to be destroyed.  After receiving a non response to the Petition filed by The Florida Bar, that wholly failed to respond to the substantive issues of the Petition the Florida Supreme Court ordered them to respond to.  The case is thrown so that the Florida Supreme Court does not have to account for its members of The Florida Bar or be liable for them, as it is learned there is a major conflict of interest between the Florida Supreme Court and the Florida Bar, in that the Florida Supreme Court insurance policy covers the state actors who work for The Florida Bar, which is under the aegis of The Florida Supreme Court as a direct extension of that court.  My how the conflicts continue to pile up, The Florida Supreme Court should have refused the case and sent it to a federal court as they were conflicted.  This decision means that complaints against Matthew Triggs of Proskauer who violated his public offices are not docketed and disposed of according to Florida law and acts to protect Proskauer from immediate prosecution.  This aiding and abetting is to be challenged next at the United States Supreme Court, that also denies to hear the case, which acts further to prevent the complaints from formal disposition and the crimes to get buried.
520 2005 01 12 - Florida Supreme Court - Order, Petitioners Motion for Judgment Non Prosequitur is Hereby Denied,  There goes due process and the right to complain against government officials found violating Supreme Court rules.  Hello Communist America.
521 2005 01 12 Florida Supreme Court Petition for All Writs Jurisdiction Denied ~ Destroy Files
522 2005 01 13 09 587 734 United States Patent & Trademark Office approval of additional six month suspension based on allegations of fraud on the USPTO and Iviewit.
523 2005 01 25 - Draft Iviewit response to Florida Supreme Court Ruling
524 2005 01 26 SC04-1078 Iviewit filed with Supreme Court of Florida for a Motion for Rehearing Clarification and Certification.
525 2005 02 03 Palm Beach Post NEWS ARTICLE regarding Delray Beach Florida Drunk Driving Felony DUI with injury charges against Christopher Clark Wheeler of Proskauer Rose.
526 2005 02 05 - BOCA RATON NEWS ARTICLE Regarding Christopher Wheeler's DUI.  What is amazing to note is that Eric M. Turner of The Florida Bar (the guy who derails the Wheeler complaints filed by Iviewit) attempts to defend Christopher Wheeler for his drunk driving charges and he falsely states to the press that the DUI was a Misdemeanor when in fact, it was charged as a felony due to the injuries suffered by the victim.  The DUI was a Felony charge as injury was incurred and as noted in the Police Report.  This shows unequivocally that Turner will go to any length to protect Wheeler using The Florida Bar to achieve this end.  Wheeler's license was not suspended due to his DUI, perhaps Turner defended him.  Wonder if they had to give Turner a second briefcase for this?
527 2005 02 05 Florida Sun Sentinel NEWS ARTICLE regarding the arrest of Christopher Wheeler of Proskauer for felony DUI with injury.
528 2005 02 14 09 630 939 United States Patent & Trademark Office approval of additional six month suspension based on allegations of fraud on the USPTO and Iviewit.
529 2005 02 15 The Florida Bar responds to the Florida Supreme Court regarding the Motion for Clarification, Rehearing and Certification filed by Iviewit.
531 2005 02 23  Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division Second Department, Clerk, James E. Pelzer letter stating he is taking the matter of the decisions to review by Diana Maxfield Kearse, Chief Counsel of the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division Second Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee and Lawrence DiGiovanna, Chairman of the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division Second Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee, instead of investigating as ordered by the First Department justices to the Presiding Justice of the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division Second Department, A. Gail Prudenti, for a decision.
532 2005 02 23  Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division Second Department, Clerk, James E. Pelzer letter stating he is taking the matter of the decisions to review by Diana Maxfield Kearse, Chief Counsel of the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division Second Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee and Lawrence DiGiovanna, Chairman of the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division Second Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee, instead of investigating as ordered by the First Department justices to the Presiding Justice of the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division Second Department, A. Gail Prudenti, for a decision.
533 2005 02 25 Iviewit response to the European Patent Office legal department, Lise Dybdahl, letter requesting suspension of the European patent applications.
534 2005 03 01 Iviewit filed Motion to Florida Supreme Court Case SC04-1078 regarding keeping The Florida Bar files on Christopher C. Wheeler, Proskauer, Matthew Triggs, Eric M. Turner, John Anthony Boggs, Lorraine Christine Hoffman, Kenneth Marvin and others for review by the United States Supreme Court and other investigators.  Requesting files be maintained according to Florida Record Retention laws + for the 20 year life of the patents, as the records are invaluable records and contain information in the files of violations of public offices and other matters that have not been investigated.
535 2005 03 05 Florida Supreme Court Docket Entry with the Christopher Wheeler of Proskauer Driving Under the Influence Felony Charge against him, welcome to Supreme Court history Chris, as the biggest ahole in court history. 
536 2005 03 09 Insipid Little Cockroaches of Minimal Brain.  Self explanatory draft.
537 2005 03 11 Iviewit letter to Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division Second Department, Clerk, James E. Pelzer regarding conflicts of interest found with State of New York Court of Appeals, Chief Judge of the State of New York, Judith S. Kaye and Steven C. Krane and asking that any new investigators sign that they have no conflicts with any of the Iviewit accused to prevent further conflicts which force further complaints.
538 2005 03 14 Pictures of the Car Bombing of Inventor Bernstein's Family Minivan that fire investigator Rick Lee of the Boynton Beach Fire Department claimed was caused by accelarants and blew up three cars next to it.  The FBI appears to have lost both the investigation files and the investigator regarding this and the Iviewit matters.  The images use Iviewit technology for zoom and panning on the images.  Check out where the minivan hood was blown out, was this where the car bomb was???
539 2005 03 14 Pictures of the Car Bombing of Inventor Bernstein's Family Minivan that fire investigator Rick Lee of the Boynton Beach Fire Department claimed was caused by accelarants and blew up three cars next to it.  The FBI appears to have lost both the investigation files and the investigator regarding this and the Iviewit matters.  The images use Iviewit technology for zoom and panning on the images.  Check out where the minivan hood was blown out, was this where the car bomb was???
540 2005 03 16 Iviewit letter to Stephen Lucchesi of the Federal Bureau of Investigation regarding the bombing of inventor Eliot I. Bernstein's family minivan and request that he enjoin investigation per Rick Lee of Boynton Beach Florida fire department.  This letter and the rest of the two years of Iviewit files regarding the patent crimes and other crimes against the United States are lost and so is Lucchesi who disappears from the Department of Justice and even they do not know where he is.  The FBI Palm Beach office refers the matter to the Department of Justice Inspector General, Glenn Fine, who requests that the FBI Office of Professional Responsibility investigate.
  2005 03 16 Iviewit letter to Stephen Lucchesi of the Federal Bureau of Investigation regarding the bombing of inventor Eliot I. Bernstein's family minivan and request that he enjoin investigation per Rick Lee of Boynton Beach Florida fire department.  This letter and the rest of the two years of Iviewit files regarding the patent crimes and other crimes against the United States are lost and so is Lucchesi who disappears from the Department of Justice and even they do not know where he is.  The FBI Palm Beach office refers the matter to the Department of Justice Inspector General, Glenn Fine, who requests that the FBI Office of Professional Responsibility investigate.
541 2005 03 17 Hague Police to have FBI contact them.
542 2005 03 18 Diana Maxfield Kearse, Chief Counsel of the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division Second Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee sends a letter stating that they had lost a letter and it was mysteriously returned by the post office.  The letter attempts to claim an investigation was done by a Committee in hopes that the fact that she reviewed the matter and dismissed it on review was now moot somehow.  What fails to be noted is the fact that this was an investigation that none of the accused had to respond to, no witnesses provided were interviewed, no documents were examined.  This document serves for further charges against Kearse for even attempting to use the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division Second Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee letterhead to continue the cover up for the accused.  The document appears to be evidence of mail fraud as well.
543 2005 03 27 Steven Krane NYSBA Positions.
544 2005 04 05 Krane ties to Bush.
545 2005 04 09 New York Supreme Second Dept Pelzer Letter Krane comments
  2005 04 09 Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division Second Department, Clerk, James E. Pelzer, letter whereby Pelzer, who is not an actor in the disciplinary, now attempts to claim that A. Gail Prudenti had decided to blow off the investigations, which he tries to now claim were completed, although all prior information states no investigation was done in lieu of being dismissed on review, inapposite the First Department court order stating immediate investigation was to be done.  He attempts to defend Krane, showing his obvious bias, instead of relying on the supposed investigations conclusions where we are sure Krane had a lawyer representing his interests.  This attempts to conclude based on a dismissal on review that Krane was not conflicted using department letterhead to deny due process and form a defense for Krane.  Pelzer nor Prudenti are part of the disciplinary process and are conflicted with Krane and Kaye and what is amazing is that they should be responding to the First Department court that ordered the investigation, not Eliot Bernstein and Stephen Lamont.  This is very telling.
546 2005 04 20 Response to 2005 04 09 Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division Second Department, Clerk, James E. Pelzer, letter.  Very interesting reading into how due process was denied and how court ordered investigations were derailed.  
548 2005 04 25 Florida Supreme Court Denial of Motion for Rehearing Clarification and Certification.
549 2005 04 25 Pataki & Spitzer Cover Letter for Document
550 2005 05 25 European Patent Office "EPO" letter denying suspension of European patents and referring the matters of fraud on the EPO to the Institute of Professional Representatives before the European Patent Office "EPI" which regulates licensed legal representatives.  Later the EPI during an investigation, sends over documents including a document in response to an official office action that is missing exhibits and the language of the letter is altered, evidencing fraud on the EPO.  Iviewit has requested immediate intervention by the FBI and Interpol to inspect the documents for forgery and fraud upon the EPO, this has gone into limbo, especially because the FBI investigator and Iviewit FBI files are now missing from the FBI.  The matters of the FBI have been elevated to the Department of Justice Inspector General Glenn A. Fine and H. Marshall Jarrett of the FBI Office of Professional Responsibility for investigation.
551 2005 06 18 - Iviewit Florida Supreme Court Case Docket SC04-1078.
552 2005 06 18 Iviewit letter to James Groody of the United States Patent & Trademark Office & Department of Justice Inspector General Glenn Fine regarding the USPTO suspensions.
553 2005 06 20 Letter to USPTO, FBI and others regarding viral attachments to emails and reporting of such activity to the Internet Crime Bureau.
554 2005 06 27 Department of Business Professional Regulation Lewin.
555 2005 07 13 Supreme Court Petition for Extension of Time.
556 2005 07 20 - 09 587730 United States Patent & Trademark Office suspension, second six months out of three possible.
557 2005 08 14 Steven C. Krane at Proskauer is counsel for the New York State Bar Association.
558 2005 08 26 Letter from the European Patent Office regarding patent filing 00955352 being lost.
559 2005 10 03 United States Patent & Trademark Office dismisses Iviewit Petition to revive abandoned patent 09 522 721, although Moatz has requested that all abandoned patents be revived.  Interesting that it is sent to Blakely Sokoloff after Iviewit had filed to have all prior patent counsel removed from the applications as they are and remain under investigation by Harry I. Moatz, Director of the Office of Enrollment and Discipline for the United States Patent & Trademark Office.
560 2005 10 05 Iviewit Patent 09 587 026 Notice of Abandonment from the United States Patent & Trademark Office.
562 2005 11 18 Chris Mercer of the Institute of Professional Representatives before the European Patent Office EPI Mercer Investigation.  This investigation would at first be closed and then reopened leading to discovery of fraudulent documents in the EPO files.
563 2005 11 28 United States Supreme Court Denial of Writ of Certiorari to review the Florida Supreme Court case.  This wholly blocks Iviewit from filing complaints against public officers found violating Florida Supreme Court office positions.
564 2005 12 21 Iviewit response to the European Patent Office regarding suspending the patents pending investigations of fraud on the EPO.
565 2006 01 06 inewswire.
566 2006 01 07 Iviewit News Release regarding Representative Nita M. Lowey (D-NY 18th) taking the Iviewit matters to Representative John D. Dingell (D-MI 15th), Chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, who then forwards the matters for investigation to the House Judiciary Committee, under the direction of The Honorable John Conyers Jr. (D-MI 14th).
567 2006 01 18 Iviewit NEWS ARTICLE by Sachin Garg of Eworld.  Garg was threatened by unknown parties to take down the article.
568 2006 01 19 NEWS ARTICLE "Tech Dirt" reports on Iviewit.
569 2006 03 03 United States Patent & Trademark Office Commissioner letter response to Iviewit letter to John J. Doll.
570 2006 04 06 Institute of Professional Representatives before the European Patent Office letter to refile the Iviewit complaints and be more specific.
571 2006 04 19 Iviewit letter to The Honorable United States Senator Dianne Feinstein written at the direction of Harry I. Moatz who stated Iviewit would need congressional help on certain issues, like getting information on IP that was listed on the Iviewit IP dockets as Iviewit's but is not on file with the United States Patent & Trademark Office the same and where the USPTO cannot release information to Iviewit as the inventors are not listed on certain applications and the owners and assignees are not Iviewit.
572 2006 04 19 Iviewit letter to The Honorable United States Senator Dianne Feinstein written at the direction of Harry I. Moatz who stated Iviewit would need congressional help on certain issues, like getting information on IP that was listed on the Iviewit IP dockets as Iviewit's but is not on file with the United States Patent & Trademark Office the same and where the USPTO cannot release information to Iviewit as the inventors are not listed on certain applications and the owners and assignees are not Iviewit.
573 2006 06 16 Iviewit response to the Florida Department of Business and Professional Relations regarding their finding of no probably cause regarding Gerald Lewin, Erika Lewin and Goldstein Lewin & Co. sent to the Inspector General of the DBPR.
574 2006 07 25 Charlie Crist conflict with Foley & Lardner article, may provide answers as to how the Iviewit complaints were derailed in Florida.
575 2006 08 02 Institute of Professional Reperesentatives before the European Patent Office, Chris Mercer letter.
576 2006 08 14 Iviewit letter to Chris Mercer, President, Institute of Professional Representatives before the European Patent Office demanding investigation.
577 2006 08 19 US SUPREME COURT CASE 05-6611 Iviewit case docket.
578 2006 09 19 Institute of Professional Representative before the European Patent Office letter response to Iviewit letter of August 2, 2006.
579 2006 09 29 Iviewit to Nita Lowey US Congress.
580 2006 11 03 Stephen R. Kaye of Proskauer Rose and husband to Chief Judge of New York, Judith Kaye, death notice.  Now have to sue estate for his involvement.  Strange that Kaye becomes a partner in the IP department of Proskauer???
581 2006 11 28 Representative Nita M. Lowey (D-NY 18th) letter to Iviewit that she was transferring the Iviewit case matters to incoming Chairman of the House Energy & Commerce Committee Representative John D. Dingell (D-MI 15th).  Dingell then forwards the matters to The Honorable John Conyers Jr. (D-MI 14th) - Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee where the matters are under investigation.
582 2006 Kaye Proskauer Owns New York Article.
583 2006 Proskauer link to Valerie Plame issues.
584 2007 01 11 Iviewit Press Release regarding Representative John D. Dingell (D-MI 15th) sending the Iviewit matters to The Honorable John Conyers Jr. (D-MI 14th) - Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee where it sits in review.
585 2007 01 18 Iviewit letter to the House Judiciary Committee regarding the Iviewit matters forwarded by Chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee Representative John D. Dingell (D-MI 15th).
586 2007 01 19  Iviewit Press Release regarding Representative John D. Dingell (D-MI 15th) sending the Iviewit matters to The Honorable John Conyers Jr. (D-MI 14th) - Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee where it sits in review. Final.
587 2007 01 28 Lou Dobbs of CNN on Skull & Bones. It is interesting to note that Skull and Bones member Luce started Time which owns CNN.  
588 2007 02 01 FINAL Iviewit request to The Honorable United States Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) for congressional aid in the Iviewit matters.
589 2007 02 01 List of ongoing and derailed investigations included in the petition for congressional aid for the Iviewit matters.
590 2007 02 05 Iviewit letter response to the European Patent Office letter tendered by Wim van der Eijk.
591 2007 04 05 President of the Institute of Professional Representatives before the European Patent Office, Chris Mercer letter response to Iviewit, this leads to learning that documents at the European Patent Office are fraudulent and have been changed in route to the EPO.
592 2007 04 09 Iviewit Response to EPO Letter FINAL.
593 2007 04 10 Wim van der Eijk letter from the European Patent Office in response to 2007 02 05 Iviewit letter.
594 2007 04 17 Iviewit Request for FBI IA and OIG investigation of FBI case.
595 2007 04 20 Iviewit request for the Federal Bureau of Investigations to launch an internal affairs probe into the missing case files of Iviewit, missing car bombing files regarding the bombing of inventor Bernstein's family minivan and the missing FBI investigator Stephen Lucchesi.
596 2007 06 11 EPO response from Wim van der Ejik regarding the documents sent by Chris Mercer, President of the Institute of Professional Representatives before the European Patent Office during his investigation which clearly show that documents were tampered with that were sent to the EPO for the patents.
597 2007 06 14 Iviewit request for the Federal Bureau of Investigations to launch an internal affairs probe into the missing case files of Iviewit, missing car bombing files regarding the bombing of inventor Bernstein's family minivan and the missing FBI investigator Stephen Lucchesi. FINAL
598 2007 06 18 Enron Broadband Exec Sentenced.
599 2007 06 28 Iviewit letter sent to Alain Pompidou, President of the European Patent Office c/o Aidan Kendrick and Wim van der Eijk, Principal Director of the European Patent Office regarding the fraudulent documents found in the investigation by the Institute of Professional Representatives before the European Patent Office.
600 2007 07 16 United States Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation Office of Professional Responsibility, H. Marshall Jarrett, Counsel begins review of the Iviewit matters regarding missing FBI case files for the Iviewit matters, the matters of the car bombing of inventor Bernstein's family minivan and the missing FBI investigator, Stephen Lucchesi.
601 2001 07 17 Iviewit Patent IP docket prepared by Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman showing patents were filed for Brian Utley by Foley & Lardner by Douglas Boehm and Steven Becker under the direction of William J. Dick and other problems.
602 2007 Denial of Due Process Exhibit.
603 2007 07 23 Iviewit New York State Commission of Investigation Complaint.
604 2007 07 30 NEWS ARTICLE - Jerusalem Post article showing how Proskauer aided Nazi cause and prevented boycott of Germany, allowing further mass destruction of human life.  In Jewish lingo, Jews who aided and abetted Nazi's were deemed Judenrat.
605 2007 07 30 Jerusalem Post Proskauer Aided Nazi Cause.
606 2007 08 05 NEWS ARTICLE "Expose Corrupt Courts" article regarding Thomas J. Cahill of the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee involved in whitewashing complaints.
607 2007 08 08 Cahill problems in New York 1.xps
608 2007 08 09 and 19 State of New York Commission of Investigation letter from Anthony Cartusciello, Deputy Commissioner, denying investigation even though Thomas Cahill corruptions are being exposed at the First Department.
609 2007 08 09 2007 08 09 and 19 State of New York Commission of Investigation letter from Anthony Cartusciello, Deputy Commissioner, denying investigation even though Thomas Cahill corruptions are being exposed at the First Department.
610 2007 08 10 Enron Broadband Article Re Execs seeking dismissal.
611 2007 08 18 Iviewit letter to Andrew Cuomo regarding the uncovering of public office corruption of Thomas Cahill, Chief Counsel of the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee and to open immediate investigation of Cahill and the investigations of Proskauer Rose, Kenneth Rubenstein, Steven C. Krane, Raymond A. Joao, Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolf & Schlissel and others involved in the denial of due process of the Iviewit complaints.
612 2007 08 18 Iviewit letter to State of New York Commission of Investigation, Anthony Cartusciello, Deputy Commissioner, in rebuttal to his denying investigation in light of the unfolding ethics scandal at the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee and request to reconsider.
613 2007 08 27 The Nation - Gonzales Resigns.
614 2007 09 05 Iviewit letter to Eliot Spitzer as Governor of New York to begin immediate investigation in light of the unfolding ethics scandal at the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee and Thomas J. Cahill and request to reopen all Iviewit cases against members of the department and those involved in the theft of Iviewit Intellectual properties.
615 2007 09 24 New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo letter denying Iviewit investigation.
616 2007 10 08 Christine C. Anderson lawsuit Case No. 07 Civ. 9599 (SAS) Christine C. Anderson v. the State of New York, et al. in the United States District Court Southern District of New York under The Honorable Justice Shira A. Scheindlin.  The filed complaint by Anderson who was an attorney for the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee who names Iviewit as part of her claims of the department "whitewashing" complaints, destroying case file information, physical assault for not following orders and other public office crimes.  Anderson claims Thomas J. Cahill and others are involved.  Cahill is the former Chief Counsel who resigned as the scandal began breaking who handled the Iviewit complaints and is currently under investigation by Martin Gold.
617 2007 10 31 New York Law Journal Exposes allegations of corruption at the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee regarding Thomas Cahill, former Chief Counsel, who resigns amist the unfolding scandal and the whistleblower lawsuit filed by former employee of the First Department Disciplinary Committee, Christine C. Anderson.  Case No. 07 Civ. 9599 (SAS) Christine C. Anderson v. the State of New York, et al. in the United States District Court Southern District of New York under The Honorable Justice Shira A. Scheindlin.  
618 2007 11 01 New York Times exposes allegations of corruption at the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee regarding Thomas Cahill, former Chief Counsel, who resigns amist the unfolding scandal and the whistleblower lawsuit filed by former employee of the First Department Disciplinary Committee, Christine C. Anderson.  Case No. 07 Civ. 9599 (SAS) Christine C. Anderson v. the State of New York, et al. in the United States District Court Southern District of New York under The Honorable Justice Shira A. Scheindlin.  
619 2007 11 22 Iviewit Press Release regarding the New York Law Journal and New York Times exposing allegations of corruption at the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee regarding Thomas Cahill, former Chief Counsel, who resigns amist the unfolding scandal and the whistleblower lawsuit filed by former employee of the First Department Disciplinary Committee, Christine C. Anderson.  Case No. 07 Civ. 9599 (SAS) Christine C. Anderson v. the State of New York, et al. in the United States District Court Southern District of New York under The Honorable Justice Shira A. Scheindlin.  
620 2007 12 11 Iviewit preliminary filing of 1.5 billion dollar lawsuit in the United States District Court Southern District of New York under The Honorable Justice Shira A. Scheindlin.  The Iviewit case is in efforts to support former employee of the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department Disciplinary Committee, Christine C. Anderson's heroic efforts to expose corruption in the department.  Case No. 07 Civ. 9599 (SAS) Christine C. Anderson v. the State of New York, et al. 
621 2007 12 12 Iviewit filing of 1.5 billion dollar lawsuit in the United States District Court Southern District of New York under The Honorable Justice Shira A. Scheindlin.  The Iviewit case, Docket No. # 07 Civ. 11196 (SAS) Eliot I. Bernstein, et al. v. Appellate Division First Department, Department Disciplinary Committee et al. is filed in effort to support former employee of the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department Disciplinary Committee, Christine C. Anderson's heroic efforts to expose corruption in the department.  Case No. 07 Civ. 9599 (SAS) Christine C. Anderson v. the State of New York, et al.  The filed amended complaint adds hundreds of defendants and claims damages over one trillion dollars, as the RICO element of the case forces the Iviewit patent crimes into the filing that began as support on disciplinary matters denying due process.
623 2007 12 21  Docket No. # 07 Civ. 11196 (SAS) Eliot I. Bernstein, et al. v. Appellate Division First Department, Department Disciplinary Committee et al. United States District Court Southern District of New York, Shira A. Scheindlin MOTION FOR: APPOINTMENT OF PRO BONO COUNSEL; EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT AFTER ORIGINAL COMPLAINT HAS BEEN FILED ON SOME OR ALL OF THE DEFENDANTS; ORDER FOR  THE UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE TO SERVE PAPERS ON REMAINING OR ALL OF THE DEFENDANTS; ACCEPT LIMITED POWER OF ATTORNEY OF PLANTIFF BERNSTEIN AND PLANTIFF LAMONT; ACCEPT REMOTE APPEARANCE OF PLAINTIFF BERNSTEIN FOR COURT PROCEEDINGS; AND PHYSICAL PROTECTION OF PLAINTIFFS FOR COURT APPEARANCES. 
624 2008 01 09 Court Order United States District Court, Southern District of New York NY case 07CV 11196 SAS.
625 2008 01 15 Iviewit Press from Yonkers Tribune on UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK filing.
626 2008 01 23 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Memo to US Marshal re Extra Copies.
627 2008 01 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Notice to Serve Courtesy Copies on Attorney General.
628 2008 02 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Letter re missing service papers.
629 2008 03 03 USPTO Non Recordation Sheet of Assignment.
630 2008 03 05 Final Plaintiff Opposition to AG Cuomo letter email copy.
631 2008 03 05 Final Plaintiff Opposition to Proskauer letter as counsel.
632 2008 03 07 Scheindlin Order re conflicts.
633 2008 03 10 Scheindlin Order re conflicts.
634 2008 03 13 FINAL Plaintiff Response to Scheindlin March 07 2008 Order.
635 2008 03 14 FINAL Letter to NY AG to reopen investigation on new evidence.
636 2008 03 20 Memo of Law in Support of TFB Motion to Dismiss Greenberg Traurig.
637 2008 03 20 Notice of Motion for Florida Bar et al filed Greenberg Traurig.
638 2008 03 21 Order Scheindlin.
639 2008 03 28 Notice of Appearance Friedman for Foley.
640 2008 03 28 Scheindlin Order re Foley counsel.
641 2008 04 01 Motion in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss for Florida Bar et al filed Greenberg Traurig.
642 2008 04 06 FINAL FILED Motion for Allow Filing of an Amended Complaint1.
643 2008 04 07 FILED FINAL Motion in Opposition to Florida Bar.
644 2008 04 08 US Department of Justice Refuse to Investigate Letter.
645 2008 04 11 Iviewit Response to FBI OPR letter signed sent and printed copy.
646 2008 04 15 FINAL SENT TO COURT and Letter to Virginia Bar Counsel Attorney General Hall re phone conv.doc
647 2008 04 21 FINAL SIGNED Motion for Pro Bono Counsel low.
648 2008 04 23 Connell Motion for VA AG Pro Hac Vice.
649 2008 05 02 Foley Anker Appearance and letter re conflicts.
650 2008 05 02 Foley Anker to Bernstein to stop contacting Foley.
651 2008 05 09 FINAL AMENDED COMPLAINT AND RICO SIGNED COPY HIGH.doc
652 2008 05 09 FINAL AMENDED COMPLAINT AND RICO SIGNED COPY LOW.doc
653 2008 05 09 FINAL AMENDED COMPLAINT AND RICO SIGNED COPY MED.doc
654 2008 05 09 FINAL MOTION FOR PRO SE DESK TO COPY AMENDED COMPLAINT.doc
655 2008 05 09 Proskauer to Scheindlin to block amended.
656 2008 05 09 Scheindlin Order to stay amended.
657 2008 05 13 Proskauer Request for Amended Complaint.
658 2008 05 13 Request for Clarification on Order dated May 9th 2008.
659 2008 05 13 Scheindlin Order Denying Pro Se Copying.
660 2008 05 15 FINAL Motion in Opposition to Order.
661 60 233 341 - 57103-123 - Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman Utley Stolen Patents.
662 60 233 341 - 57103-123 Utley Theft.
663 60 233 344 - 57103-122 - BLAKELY SOKOLOFF TAYLOR & ZAFMAN Copy Utley Theft 2.
664 60 233 344 - Utley Zoom and Pan Camera Filing.
665 872 99 99 air d&o insurance policy face page
666 Anthony Boggs Message Regarding Kelly Overstreet Johnson Cannot Accept Files - After it was discovered that she had conflicts of interest with Wheeler brother - Windows Media File
667 Armstrong Hersh Documents Part 2.
668 ARTHUR ANDERSEN FILES
669 Bankruptcy documentation of Intel/RYJO Utley Reale Hersh they file on companies they have no contracts with and get caught.  At the time we did not know these were mirror companies of the shareholder companies with stolen patents.  We thought they filed on the wrong companies and were idiots.  It was not until the patent office told us that patents were in some of these companies that we learned that Proskauer had fraudulently set up corporations that mirrored companies and had second set of stolen patents going into them.  This action was filed without company knowledge and the company found out from AOLTW/WB that this action existed.
670 Barroway Bar Complaint Final.
671 Barroway Breach Issues.doc
672 Blakely Letter to USPTO removing Utley from patents never happened.
673 Blakely patent portfolio versus Foley and Meltzer.
674 BSTZ Japanese Filings Portfolio.
675 BSTZ Japanese Filing of Utley Patent after he is gone.
676 bush-kerry-yale.
677 conspiracies.htm
678 Crossbow Ventures and on Behalf of the SBA files charges of Fraud On the United States Patent & Trademark Office with Iviewit.
679 Depositions (Eliot Bernstein, Simon Bernstein, Kenneth Rubenstein, Christopher Wheeler, Gerald Lewin, William Kasser, Brian Utley) SEARCHABLE with hyperlink comments
680 Dick Involvement with Utley at Diamond Turf Equipment, Inc. and Virginia Bar Statement.
681 Dick Statement Contradict Utley on Filing Patent.
682 Eliot Timeline of email 98-99.tif
683 Ellen DeGeneres Video Netfomercial Regarding Iviewit
684 EPO fraud filing.
685 Erika Lewin notes on corporate structure to Ernst Young Completely false and misleading.
686 Exhibit B - Tiedemann Prolow Loan Documents.
687 Exhibit B2 Utley Employment Agreement and Non Compete.
688 Exhibit I Lewin COI and Wheeler.
689 Flaster withdraw as counsel.
690 Florida supreme court case docket sc04-1078.
691 Foley Lardner Patent Portfolio submitted to the Virginia Bar.  When this was sent to Harry Moatz at the United States Patent Office it was found to contain false and misleading information regarding certain patent applications.
692 FREE PRESS INTERNATIONAL Bush and Kerry both admit to being members of Skull and Bones.htm
693 Gail Prudenti Judith kayo conflict.
694 grebe1.
695 grebe2.
696 grebe3.
697 grebe4.
698 Holy Grail Articles
699 I-Newswire Press Release on Data Compression Article.
700 Investigations Master Sheet Showing Denial of Due Process and Procedure for derailed investigations.htm
701 Investor Presentation v2.ppt
702 Iviewit / Cyberfyds Early Site
703 Iviewit Master Attorney Document.
704 Iviewit Press Release Sachin Garg Eworld.
705 Iviewit Press Release.
706 Iviewit Stock Certs.
707 JOAO and Utley PATENTS.doc
708 Joao at Dreier Baritz Law Firm.
709 Joao at Dugan and Dugan PC.
710 Joao destroying documents.
711 Joao distance learning patent.
712 JOAO FIRST BILLING MISSING FEBRUARY FILING WHICH HE HAS RECEIPT FOR< WHERE DID IT GO?.
713 Joao Inventions 2.MDI
714 Joao Inventions List.
715 Jiao patents 2.mdi
716 Jiao patents.
717 Joao was told of bad claims prior to filing by Utley.
718 Joao's biggest client himself article.
719 Johnson receipt of Triggs complaint.
720 Kasser Corporate Books.
721 Kaye Article Proskauer In Firm
722 kayo Prudenti accepts awards for her.
723 kayo Prudenti on board together.
724 kayo Prudenti problems in other case.
725 Krane bio 2
726 Krane President of NY Bar Rubenstein.
727 Krane Proskauer Bio.
728 Krane Suicide Letter Tendered in Conflict and Violation of Public Office in Response to Complaint against him and Proskauer
729 Letter to Jackie Selebi President of Interpol.
730 Letter to the Honorable Senator Dianne Feinstein D California Signed.
731 Lewin Deposition Fingering Rubenstein
732 Lewin Deposition on Memory page 666
733 LEWIN video
734 list of bar actions and others
735 List of Patent Suspensions
736 List of State Federal and other crimes
737 Lucchesi letter re Interpol.
738 Mark Gaffney Supporting Documents.htm
739 Matthew Triggs of Proskauer represents Wheeler while in blackout period of his Supreme Court of Florida Bar position in conflict of interest and violation of public office.
740 missing inventors Jiao and foley.
741 missing inventors Jiao patents told to wheeler and Foley 1.wav
742 missing inventors Jiao patents told to wheeler and Foley 2.wav
743 Motion for Mistrial Version 4_Final.
744 Motion for Rubenstein and Wheeler to resume depositions.
745 Narine Bar Complaint Final.
746 NDA - Goldman Sachs - Jeffrey Friedstein.
747 NDA Infringers.
748 node violators
749 New York State Bar Represented by Proskauer Rose making whole bar disciplinary system conflicted.
750 News Crossbow Iviewit Investment 1500000
751 News Crossbow Iviewit Investment 1500000
752 New York Bar Association STRIKE RUBENSTEIN RESPONSE - COMPLAINT AGAINST KRANE.
753 office of solicitor general.
754 Officers Directors Professionals Summary Version 2.doc
755 Outline of Crimes
756 Patent Pool Infringers
757 patentforfraud.htm
758 press Ellen DeGeneres full story.
759 Proskauer Bills - Summary General Ledger.
760 Proskauer Client Infringers
761 Proskauer Intellectual Property Billings Rubenstein
762 Proskauer Patent Bills.
763 Proskauer plume Wilson lawsuit.
764 Proskauer Rose v. Iviewit - Pleadings 1 2001 05 to 2002 08
765 PROSKAUER RUBENSTEIN PATENT POOLS
766 Proskauer Technology Department 2.
767 Proskauer v Iviewit CA 01 04671 AB
768 Proskauer v Iviewit CA 01 04671 AB.
769 Proskauer Wheeler Business Plan Bills
770 Proskauer Wheeler Patent Copyright and related bills
771 Prudenti Proskauer conflicts.
772 Real 3D and Huizenga info.
773 Real 3D Opinion and Licensing Info.
774 Response to AICPA Final Executed.
775 Response_to_Garcia_Stallone_Version_1.
776 RICO CRIME CHARTS
777 Rubenstein as counsel 2.
778 Rubenstein Deposition I know nothing.
779 Rubenstein Joao Utley Filipek Meeting NY Rubenstein Office.
780 RYJO LETTER WARNING OF USING IVIEWIT TECH INTEL HERSH.
781 RYJO/INTEL claim Iviewit technologies as their own and seek intellectual properties on iviewit technology while under node
782 SBA Loan Due Diligence Utley Sends info with Rubenstein as Board Member.
783 Selz message on Rubenstein and Proskauer wheeler.
784 SHAREHOLDER STATEMENTS BOOKMARKED
785 Shareholders
786 Shareholders
787 skull 10.MDI
788 Skull 7 Bush Plame.
789 skull 8.MDI
790 skull 9.MDI
791 skull1.
792 skull2.
793 skull3 cobs news.
794 skull4.MDI
795 skull4.
796 skull5.
797 skull6.MDI
798 Stephen Selz, Esq.. message on Rubenstein and wheeler documents showing the opposite of their statements to courts and bars 
799 STOCK CERT HUIZENGA CANCELLED.
800 Stock Certs for Iviewit Technologies, Inc.
801 Summary of Damages
802 Tech Dirt Iviewit News.
803 The Fight for the Grail
804 TRADEMARK ASSIGNMENTS AND LISTS.
805 USPTO cannot give information on Utley patent1.
806 USPTO CFR 37 CONSOLIDATED RULES
807 USPTO correspondence two.
808 USPTO USC Title 35 Patent Laws
809 Utley Background Lies Exposed During His Deposition forgot to put on resume Proskauer Wheeler tendered that Foley's Dick, Wheeler and himself were found stealing patents at his last job 
810 Utley Deposition Dick Never Filed Patent at Diamond Turf contradicts Dick's statement to Virginia Bar that he did.
811 Utley Deposition PATENT PROBLEMS Diamond Turf 1.
812 Utley Deposition PATENT PROBLEMS Diamond Turf.
813 Utley Deposition Wheeler Knew About Diamond Turf 2.
814 Utley Deposition Wheeler Knew About Diamond Turf.
815 Utley Deposition Wheeler Never Represented Me - Wheeler contradicts this in his deposition saying he represented Utley.
816 Utley Deposition camera application.
817 UTLEY DEPOSITION DIAMOND TURF PATENT PROBLEMS.
818 Utley Deposition NO COLLEGE CLEAN.
819 Utley Deposition Patents All Assigned to Iviewit.
820 Utley Deposition Rubenstein Not An Advisor.
821 Utley Dick Attorney at DIAMOND TURF EQUIPMENT, INC..
822 Utley Patent Dispute at DIAMOND TURF EQUIPMENT, INC.
823 Utley Resume - Perfect Copy.
824 Utley Statement for Dick Foley Virginia Bar Response.
825 Utley stolen patent samples
826 Utley to Joao Major Missing Items in patent - clean copy.
827 Virginia Bar bar.
828 Virginia Bar fl bar correspondences Williams turner.
829 Weisberg and Selz orders from Schiffrin Barroway.
830 Wheeler Articles FAU Scandal & Fuzion Fraud.
831 Wheeler Deposition Iviewit Portal not Inventions.
832 Wheeler Deposition I represented Utley.
833 Wheeler Deposition Regarding Conflicts Check.
834 Wheeler deposition stating NO PATENT OPINION.
835 Wheeler Guilty of Felony DUI with Injury.
836 Wheeler supplement to deposition.
837 Wheeler/Proskauer marketing letter with client list, show's that Wheeler, Rubenstein and Proskauer knew far more about the technology than they now claim
838 Zakirul on feasibility study.
839 Zakirul on Jiao having switch and signing patents.
840 Zakirul testimony on Jiao meeting wheeler4.wav
841 Zakirul testimony on Rubenstein Jiao meeting wheeler.
842 Zakirul testimony on Rubenstein Jiao meeting wheeler.
843 Zakirul testimony on Rubenstein Jiao meeting wheeler2.wav
844 Zakirul testimony on Rubenstein Jiao meeting wheeler2.wav
845 Zakirul testimony on signing patents.
846 Zakirul testimony on signing patents2.wav
847 ZAKIRUL SHIRAJEE SWORN STATEMENT.
848 Zakirul Shirajee testimony on Rubenstein Joao patent disclosure meetings at Wheeler's Proskauer office
849 Zakirul Shirajee testimony 
850 Zakirul Shirajee testimony 
851  
852 2000 06 14 Proskauer Rose Generated Business Plan Iviewit with Rubenstein as Advisor Legal Counsel
853 1999 06 09 Proskauer Investigating Lewin, CPA Document and Lewin Conflict Letter re Visual Data
854 1999 06 14 Proskauer Kept Confidentiality Agreements
855 2000 08 26 Iviewit Business Plan Generated by Utley with Rubenstein as Advisor to Board Contradicting all Deposition of Rubenstein Utley and Wheeler
856 2000 06 09 Document Service International License Agreement.
857 2000 06 20 Goldman Sachs receiving Patents as Investment Banker for Iviewit
858 1999 04 26 Goldstein Lewin Financial Projections Iviewit
859 00938124.5Complete file.
860 00938126.0Complete file.
861 00942690.9Complete file.
862 00955352.0Complete file.
863 00944619.6Complete file.
864 2007 07 16 US Department of Justice Letter stating they are beginning review of the Iviewit matters
865

McKeown Order http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/McKeown/20080612%20McKeown%20Order%20to%20submit%20Judge%20affirmations%20under%20seal.pdf

866

 NYAG Letter to Scheindlin

http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20080229%20NYAG%20State%20Actors%20Letter%20to%20Hon%20Schiendlin.pdf

867

Iviewit Letter to Pataki and Spitzer

http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/2005%2004%2022%20pataki%20and%20spitzer%20cover%20letter%20of%20Kearse%20Supreme%20letter.doc

868

NYAG Letter re Affirmations of Justices

http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/McKeown/20080612%20AG%20Trying%20to%20Stop%20Judges.pdf

869

NY Times Article, NYAG officials transfer to Proskauer and then later represent Spitzer in his affairs, literally @

http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20070518%20NY%20TIMES%20PROSKAUER%20REPRESENTS%20SPITZER%201.pdf

870

Law.com – Schnell and Cleary of NYAG join Proskauer

http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20070508%20NYAG%20Snell%20and%20Cleary%20at%20Proskauer.pdf

871

New York Daily News - Spitzer Hires Proskauer for his Troopergate Scandal

http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20071013%20Spitzer%20Hires%20Proskauer.pdf

872

VA AG HIRES FOLEY LARDNER

http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/VAAG%20HIRES%20FOLEY%20LARDNER.pdf

873

Dittner Returned Cashiers Checks

http://www.iviewit.tv/Dittner%20Eviction/20080531%20Returned%20Rent%20Checks%20for%20April%20and%20May%20delivered%20May%2031%202008.pdf

874

Dittner Case Information

http://www.iviewit.tv/Dittner%20Eviction/Master%20Dittner%20Eviction.pdf

875

UPS Letter Regarding Error in Times for Pickup, their mistake

http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20080712%20Letter%20from%20UPS%20re%20error.pdf

876

Letters Regarding Simpson Stabbing to USDOJ OIG and Garaventa

http://www.iviewit.tv/Simpson%20Case/20080130%20Lucas%20Simpson%20Letter%20to%20Garaventa.pdf

and

http://www.iviewit.tv/Simpson%20Case/20080130%20Lucas%20Simpson%20Letter%20to%20Tehama%20County%20Sheriff.pdf

877 20080528 Court returns Motion for Pro Bono to Re-file
878 20080528 Motion to Dismiss for Virginia Bar Defendants
879 20080530 Bush Impeachment Articles - Kucinich
880 20080530 Meltzer Affidavit of Service
881 20080530 Meltzer Lippe Cross Motion.pdf
882 20080530 Motion to Dismiss Foley Lardner Anker Supporting Case Law
883 20080530 Motion to Dismiss Foley Lardner Anker
884 20080530 Motion to Dismiss Joao
885 20080530 NYAG Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint
886 20080530 NYAG Motion to Dismiss Exhibit 2
887 20080530 NYAG Motion to Dismiss Memorandum of Law in Support
888 20080603 Anker Foley & Lardner Rule 26 Response
889 20080603 MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME DUE TO EXTRANEOUS CIRCUMSTANCE
890 20080606  Court return of Motion to Dismiss Response filed in error ~ supposedly
891 20080616 Christine C. Anderson Docket with Eliot as Plaintiff ~ supposedly error
892 20080618 Order Granting Extension of Time
893 20080712 Letter from UPS re error
894 20080712 UPS Package ERROR letter regarding MTD response
895 20080714 FINAL SIGNED Supp Extension Time and Opposition to Motions to Dismiss
896 20080714 FINAL SIGNED Supp Extension Time and Opposition to Motions to Dismiss page 55
897 20080714 Letter to Judge Scheindlin
898 20080717 Deny Default on Proskauer
899 20080718 FINAL SIGNED Opposition to Proskauer letter dated July 17 2008
900 20080718 Letter to Scheindlin Re Proskauer letter dated July 17 2008
901 20080718 ORDER RE PROSKAUER DEFAULT
902 20080801 Scheindlin Denies Lamont Sur Reply 1
903 20080808 Scheindlin Dismissal of Complaint no comments
904 20080808 Scheindlin Dismissal of Complaint
905 20080808 Scheindlin Dismissal of related complaints
906 20080812 New York Law Journal Re Scheindlin Dismissals
907 20080819 USDC SDNY Scheindlin Order on Reconsideration
908 20080828 Motion for Extension to File Appeal
909 20080830 Notice of Appeal & Extension of Time
910 20080909 NYAG PUBLIC INTEGRITY COMPLAINT
911 20080924 Appeal Information Response USDC SDNY
912 20081002 Index to the record on appeal 2
913 20081002 Index to the record on appeal
914 20081002 US Marshal Service of Eric Turner at the SBA
915 20081006 Acknowledgement of Appeal Lamont
916 20081006 Cahill Complaint First Department Reardon Response
917 20081006 Docketing Letter 2nd Circuit Lamont
918 20081016 Court of Appeals Clerk Switch
919 20081016 received 20081028 appeal notice
920 20081026 Notice of Appearance Appeal
921 20081027 USDOJ - FBI Letter re OIG letter
922 20081107 First Department Disciplinary Letter Lamont to Reardon Part 2
923 20081107 First Department Disciplinary Letter Lamont to Reardon
924 20081116 Lamont Appellant Brief
925 20081118 LAMONT JUDICIARY COMMITTEE MEETING -- Date, Time, Venue
926 20081118 Lamont Telephone Conversation Reardon
927 20081118 Lamont to Judiciary Committee
928 20081118 Lamont to Judiciary Committee 2
929 20081120 USDC Court of Appeal Extension letter
930 20081202 Proskauer Letter to Court to Merge Appeals
931 20081203 Virginia Bar Letter US Court of Appeals 2nd Circus
932 20081215 Lamont IVIEWIT AFFIDAVIT_v1
933 20081215 Lamont Witness List_12_15_2008 Submission_v3
934 20081217 VA AG Motion Information Statement
935 20081219 Admission of Virginia Bar Pro Hac to Court of Appeals
936 20081229 Lamont Update Gizella Weishauss SDNY Hearing
937 20081231 US Court of Appeals Docs
938 20090112 First Department Letter Response to Attorney Complaints
939 2009 Bradley Foundation Grebe Foley Donations
940 2009 Intel Correspondence List Exhibit SEC
941 2009 Madoff Stanford linkage
942 20090616 FINAL NYSD BK Proof of Claim Letter SGI BK
943 200901 Rolling Stones Bush Interview - Hysterical
944 20090109 Motion For Extension of Time to File an Appeal
945

20090114 Judge Jonathan Lippman Motion to First Department Court Thomas J. Cahill and Alan W. Friedberg - Lamont filed

946 20090127 CONFLICT OF INTEREST DISCLOSURE FORM FOR COURT OF APPEALS
947 20090127 Conflict of Interest Form
948 20090127 Final Extension of Time 2
949 20090127 First Department Letter Reardon Dismissing Complaint against Cahill and Friedberg - Lamont filed
950 20090128 Court of Appeals Exhibit 1
951 20090128 Final Extension of Time 2
952 20090128 Final Extension of Time 2
953 20090128 Lamont Letter to Senator John Sampson
954 20090128 Lamont Letter to Senator Malcolm Smith
955 20090129 Final Extension of Time 2 SIGNED low
956 20090130 Lamont Threat to Bernstein Notice No 2
957 20090130 Lamont Threat to Bernstein Notice No 2
958 20090202 Lamont Letter to Jonathan Lippman
959 20090205 Anderson Attorney Statement and list of depositions
960 20090206 US Court of Appeal Denial of Motion for Ext of Time
961 20090209 FINAL Iviewit Response to First Department Re Conflict Foley Proskauer attorneys SIGNED
962 20090209 Lamont Attempt to Quash Bernstein Motion
963 20090209 NYAG PUBLIC INTEGRITY COMPLAINT SIGNED
964 20090213 FINAL SIGNED LETTER OBAMA TO ENJOIN US ATTORNEY
965 20090216 Deborah Homes Temp Stay on Appeal and Date Correction
966 20090216 Edwin S Kneedler US Solicitor General
967 20090216 Second Circuit Request for Temp Stay on Appeal and Date Correction
968 20090217 Letter To Holmes Regarding Court Extension
969 20090217 NYAG Integrity Confirmation of First Dept Complaints
970 20090217 Second Circuit Holmes request for stay to file appeal and confirmation deliveries
971 20090218 Motion other than ext sent to panel to hear appeal ORDER
972 20090219 Lamont Opposition to Bernstein Motion Final
973 20090219 USCA Order and Scheduling Order 2
974 20090224 Virginia Bar Brief Reply
975 20090225 USDC Northern TX Filing RE SEC ALLEN STANFORD
976 20090227 FINAL SIGNED BRIEF USCA 2nd Circ 13988
977 20090227 Allen Stanford Amended Complaint
978 20090228 Receipts for Service of Brief
979 20090302 FINAL Emergency Motion Re Proskauer Stanford Madoff Dreier Scandals
980 20090303 Proskauer Notice of Appearance
981 20090306 Intel Demand Letter & Liability Exposure Signed
982 20090309 First Department Complaints Proskauer and Foley re Shira Scheindlin Case
983 20090313 FINAL BERNSTEIN BRIEF SIGNED REDO
984 20090316 USDC Texas Letter Re Trustee Withdraw SIGNED
985 20090318 Meltzer Brief Reply
986 20090325 FINAL Intel SEC Complaint SIGNED
987 20090325 Intel Correspondence Regarding SEC complaint
988 20090325 SEC FAX Cover Page
989 20090326 08-4873 Brief of The Florida Bar Appellees w notes
990 20090326 08-4873 Brief of The Florida Bar Appellees
991 20090326 Intel email letter
992 20090327 Brief for Defendant-Appellee Raymond A Joao
993 20090330 Docket No  08-4873-cv Brief for Foley  Lardner Defendants-Appellees
994 20090330 NYAG Enlargement of Time Request to Court of Appeals
995 20090330 SEC confirmation of Intel complaint
996 200904 SGI Davis Polk App Employ SDNY Bankruptcy
997 20090402 Order Granting Appellees State Defendants Extension of Time
998 20090403 Final Demand Letter to SGI and Ramirez
999 20090406 Grebe Foley Shady Organization
1000 20090406 Lamont Motion to Strike Joao sent to Panel
1001 20090409 FINAL US Bankruptcy Court SDNY SGI Motion
1002 20090410 Proof Of Claim SGI BK Filing
1003 20090414 Bush Six Accused in Spain of WAR CRIMES
1004 20090416 FINAL SIGNED Demand Letter to Lockheed Martin Chief Counsel James Comey
1005 20090416 Michael Grebe DA investigation school scandal
1006 20090417 Proskauer Ensnared in Tax Shelter Scams
1007 20090419 UN says failure to Prosecute CIA torturers by Obama unacceptable and a war crime
1008 20090427 07cv9599 Shira Scheindlin Decision to Move related Anderson case to trial
1009 20090427 FINAL Lockheed SEC Complaint
1010 20090429 08-4873-cv Brief for NY Defendants-Appellees
1011 20090429 Swedish Heiress Claims Proskauer Stole Art Guggenheim Lindholm
1012 20090430 USBK SDNY SGI Hearing
1013 20090507 Grebe Bradley Foundation federalist-society
1014 20090507 Motion Information Statement - Ext of Time to File Response to Appeal Rebuttal SIGNED
1015 20090512 Allen Stanford Laura Pendergest Holt Indicted Proskauer
1016 20090513 Order Approving Additional Time
1017 20090513 Proskauer Sjoblom Stanford re lying to SEC
1018 20090516 Skull Bones behind Great Depression and Great Depression 2
1019 20090521 Lamont Notice to Move Complaints against Cahill etc
1020 20090523 Dreier Partners in LA investigated
1021 20090524 Bilderbergs 2009 attendees
1022 20090525 Scarborough 911 Greenberg Traurig
1023 20090526 Motion Extension Kidney Stones Signed
1024 20090530 Foley Partner Lamb Hale takes counsel position at Department of Commerce
1025 20090602 Enron Broadband Exec Pleads Guilty
1026 20090602 Scheindlin Spitzer Prostitution Case
1027 20090603 Greenberg Traurig Investigation
1028 20090605 USCA Motion for Extension of Time Kidney Stones 2
1029 20090604 Judiciary Committee New York Speech Outline
1030 20090608 New York Judiciary Committee Hearing First Dept Witness List
1031 20090613 FINAL NYAG Steven Cohen Letter signed
1032 20090616 FINAL NYSD BK Proof of Claim and Letter SGI BK
1033 20090618 FINAL NYAG Steven Cohen Letter Re Lamont Signed
1034 Anderson v. New York -- Second Am Compl. (Filed Stamped)
1035 20080307 Scheindlin Order 03 07 2008 (2)
1036 Christine Anderson 07cv9599 12DEC07 Transcript
1037 Christine Anderson 07cv9599 Answer to Second Amended Complaint
1038 20071028 07cv9599 Anderson Original Filing
1039 20080111 Anderson Second Amended Complaint
1040 20081003 Anderson Motion for Summary Judgment
1041 20090205 Deposition of Sherry Cohen Partial
1042 20090205 Deposition of Thomas Cahill Partial
1043 2009025 Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe Deposition Partial
1044 20090427 07cv9599 Decision
1045 Anderson Presiding Judge Jonathan Lippman Affidavit
1046 Anderson New York Times DDC Article
1047 20080122 Capogrosso related case Original Filing (for a copy of this document please contact iviewit@iviewit.tv)
1048 Pamela Carvel related case Filing
1049 20080707 New York Law Journal re Pamela Carvel
1050 20090304 Marc S. Dreier Baritz Fraud Article Joao Meltzer
1051 20081228 Luisa Esposito related case Original Filing
1052 Esposito\Brief for Defendant- Appellee Harvey Gladstein & Partners LLC
1053 Esposito\Defendant Appellee Allen H. Isaac's Brief
1054 Expose Corrupt Court Articles
1055 Suzanne McCormick 08cv4438 related case complaint
1056 Kevin McKeown 08cv5914 related case
1057 20080307 Kevin McKeown
1058 20080428 McKeown OSC 08cv2391
1059 20080502 McKeown 08cv2391 OSC DENIED
1060 20080612 McKeown AG Trying to Stop Judges
1061 20081020 Martin Gold Letter From McKeown
1062 20080612 McKeown Order to submit Judge affirmations under seal
1063 20090127 senate-judiciary-hearing McKeown testimony
1064 20080520 McKeown Brady Letter Re Judges testifying 08cv2391 letter
1065 20090508 367 Bernstein Denial of Emergency Motion 2
1066 20090508 367 Bernstein Denial of Emergency Motion
1067 20090508 SGI BK Hearing Script into records
1068 20090508 Silicon Graphics Inc. Case No. 09-11701
1069 20090518 Proof of Claim and info
1070 Bernstein Objection SGI BK
1071 SGI Ramirez Declaration
1072 Allen Stanford SEC Court Docs
1073 20090619 Allen Stanford FBI Indictment
1074 20090619 FBI Arrests Stanford Proskauer
1075 20090305 Another Possible Stanford Murder
1076 20090328 Proskauer Sued by Stanford Holt Sjoblom
1077 20090409 Scheindlin IBM Ford Apartheid
1078 20090325 Proskauer Scheindlin FCPA case
1079 20090412 Shira Scheindlin IBM Apartheid case
1080 20090425 Stanford Receiver sues Florida Greenberg Traurig lawyer
1081 20080439 08cv4053 Gizella Weisshaus related case
1082 20081229 Gizella Weisshaus Order to Show Cause
1083 20090519 Weisshaus 2 Sampson
1084 20020116 SGI transfers patents to MICROSOFT
1085 20070924 New York AG Cuomo letter denying Iviewit investigation
1086 20071008 Christine C. Anderson Original Filing related case 07civ9599
1087 20090622 US Court of Appeals Extension of Time Approval
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   

 

 

 

PART III - MEET THE CONSPIRATORS ATTEMPTING TO STEAL THE HOLY GRAIL INVENTIONS OR THE INVENTIONS THAT WERE A GIFT FROM G0D TO HELP YOUR CHILDREN
Christopher Clarke Wheeler, Esq.

Meet Christopher Clarke Wheeler, the Proskauer Rose attorney the inventors and Simon Bernstein first trusted with their inventions, the first lawyer on the scene.  Wheeler was  introduced to Iviewit by Simon Bernstein's neighbor in Florida, Eliot Bernstein's personal accountant at the time for other business activity, Gerald R. Lewin, also first on the scene.  Lewin is the guy wholly responsible for assembling the team of crooks, as the first zoom technology was brought to him and he promised to get us a good attorney.  When he introduced us to Wheeler, he vouched for him, he was his 20 year friend, along with Albert Gortz, Esq. of Proskauer.  What they failed to notify the Bernstein's about was that Lewin, knew at the time that Wheeler had been involved in attempting to steal patents and tradesecrets from a one Monte Friedkin with guys yet to be introduced to the Bernstein's, later the Iviewit shareholders, Mssrs: Brian Utley and William J. Dick, Esq of Foley and Lardner.  At the time it was unknown to all but Lewin and the scam was on.  In the end, if the story holds true as to how the patents were stolen, how the government was stolen...these two will be the clowns most responsible for things like dead kids in Iraq, read on...

EXTRA! EXTRA! READ ALL ABOUT IT ~ PROSKAUER ROSE ATTORNEY CHRISTOPHER CLARKE WHEELER, ESQ. CONVICTED FOR A FELONY DUI W/ INJURY CHARGE.  THE BEGINNING OF MANY CHARGES HE MAY BE FACING!!!

The link below provides the Del Ray Beach Florida Police Report.  Wheeler's wife sells him down the river, screaming he should not have been driving WASTED, Wheezler's wife further disses him to PD stating he left the guy injured in the car, to wasted to even care.  Wins funniest police report ever, unless you were the poor guy in the other car injured.  You wonder how he kept his partnership at Proskauer, oops, they only hire criminals and thugs, dirty lawyers.  Proskauer is such a shitty firm they are oft referred to as a Brown Shoe New York law firm. 

Wheezler is the original violator of his legal oaths to Iviewit, he should stand up well in court one day, that is if he is not toooooo wasted to stand, he certainly will stand well in hell soon.

Click the picture or smack the Wheezler for his DUI arrest report, it is a hoot.


WHEEZLER REPORT


Organization crime chart showing the various connections between the key conspirators.  One man was left out at the time the charts where done, Michael Grebe of Foley and Lardner who elevates the charts to the highest level, you will learn more about him below.

MEET THE WHOLE CRIME FAMILY
(turn on speakers)


Did the Founding Fathers, the guys drafting the Constitution envision a time where the largest companies, perhaps even states, the federal government and foreign nations would try an rip-off inventors and not pay their rightful royalties to them?  Could they have imaging to perpetrate the crime their would be a siege on the government, on the Commerce Department by those entrusted with protecting the inventor?  A siege all the way to the top of the Executive, Judicial and Legislative branches, read on...


CHECK OUT LETTER FROM AOLTW


IVIEWIT PRESS RELEASE


Did the Founders see that in giving the Inventor monopoly powers that these same forces that would try to steal inventions would also attempt to murder the inventor?  See car bombing above.

Did the Founders know that these same forces would at times try to rip apart and destroy the Inventor using unfair trade practices to wipe them out of business, bundling and tying the inventions and blocking the ma and pa inventor from market to prey upon their inventions without remuneration. 

IVIEWIT APPEAL TO THE HONORABLE UNITED STATES SENATOR DIANNE FEINSTEIN - REQUEST FOR CONGRESSIONAL INTERVENTION AND AN ACT OF CONGRESS TO PROTECT THE INVENTORS AND THEIR INVENTIONS


Here we go, all the way to Congress, to test our new Congress and to see if the Administration of Corruption has ceased to be or just changed face with the Democrats regaining some semblance of power back.  Oh but wait, it appears that Congress is like an unstable molecule, with one murder or death, deciding votes could come from Darth Cheney.  Will they kill a congressman to shift the balance of power?  Shits crazy, getting crazier, so watch out what you eat Congressman.  Desperate men will do desperate things to hide from their crimes, ask any Nazi.

Remember as Iviewit goes to this new Democratic Congress it is Iviewit's contention that the corruption is not party specific.  That the criminals are neither loyal to Democrats nor Republicans but instead to spoiled rotten click clubs like Skull & Bones, Council on Foreign Relations, Bohemian and other ubber right wing fanatical groups with agenda's inapposite Democracy, positioning on both sides of political tickets, a member of the click assured a win either way, their cult agenda overriding their oath to the People.  If that fails, it appears that election fraud is becoming the next easiest ticket into politics and where that fails fire the prosecutors.

Did the Founders foresee a situation whereby the forces they instituted to protect the Inventor would be usurped by the very legal system of protection instituted to protect the inventor?  An infiltration of the three branches of the government, a treasonous attempt to steal Democracy for self interests at the highest levels, so as to perverse the entire system to usurp the gatekeepers of Democracy with members of secret cults with agenda's against the People? 

 

"Word" from John F. Kennedy on Secret Societies & Freedom of the Press - Dig this guy up

Why you ask would anyone attempt such heinous crimes against the People?  Trillion dollar technologies from Iviewit as one example but if you  remember, the guys who started first stealing Iviewit technology, had a past in patent theft, perhaps Iviewit was the biggest they had come across.  Yet knowing it was organized leaves one to wonder how deep they had already infiltrated the patent office, how many thefts were in process before Iviewit and Monte Friedkin, how many other inventors had they ripped off, how many others had they attempted to murder, how many may they have already murdered?  Is MPEGLA LLC a criminal organization designed to gain disclosure of inventions under attorney client privilege and then kill inventors or drive them out of market, tying and bundling their inventions to their controlled standards and patent pools, stealing at will with no fear of prosecution, so brazen as to propose HR 1908 a broad daylight attempt to rob the patent office and the patent holders by changing the fundamental laws of the system by the very people that are supposed to protect the People, at the highest level.  Hang the dirty attorneys who even put pen to this Treasonous act.  Had they already infiltrated positions within the USPTO, was this a mechanism for organized crime syndicate to steal the greatest jewels in America from unsuspecting inventors and fund their criminal organizations. 

Howard Coble at the Gonzales Attorney Firing Hearings Asks About Patent Theft and Criminal Organizations that use such CRIMES to fund their criminal organizations - Could he have been referring to the Iviewit case that now is missing from the US Attorney's Office?  You make the call

 


TECHDIRT NEWS ARTICLE OR DOWNLOAD


Another link that may raise your other brow in tying Iviewit to the overthrow of the government, is the fact that Judge Jorge Labarga who turned the election debacle in Florida to the Florida Supreme Court v. demanding a recount was soon thereafter the Judge who took over the Proskauer Rose lawsuit against Iviewit for a supposed billing dispute.   Turned out to be an attempt to rid the illegally set up corporations by Proskauer, after Arthur Andersen started snooping around, by suing these companies to create a large debt, while having their former management plants like Utley file an involuntary bankruptcy against them, so as they would have claims to the stolen Intellectual Property within them.  The Iviewit shareholders and management had no idea that the companies were any legal actions, as the company was being represented by counsel Proskauer retained to perfect the scam.  Bait and Switch, Shell Game, Flim Flam and every dirty trick in the book that a lawyer could execute.  Iviewit was tipped off to the actions by a tipster from AOLTW who was doing due diligence when happening upon these legal actions no one had disclosed in the Wachovia Private Placement Proskauer had disseminated to them and was distributing to other unsuspecting investors, including the SBA.


Complaint against Wheeler at the Florida Bar is found to be handled by Matthew Triggs, a Proskauer partner who is found to be violating his position as an officer of the Florida Supreme Court - The Florida Bar.  Triggs is precluded from representing any party without waiver from the Board, conceals his conflict, and fires off a seething attack, in violation of public office against inventor Bernstein.

SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA FILING AGAINST MATTHEW TRIGGS AND CHRISTOPHER WHEELER FOR VIOLATIONS OF SUPREME COURT FLORIDA BAR PUBLIC OFFICES.


MEET KENNETH RUBENSTEIN, ESQ.

MPEGLA PATENT EVALUATOR - KENNETH RUBENSTEIN OF PROSKAUER ROSE ORDERED FOR INVESTIGATION BY THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK - UNANIMOUS ORDER BY 5 JUSTICES OF THE FIRST DEPARTMENT FOR CONFLICT AND APPEARANCE OF IMPROPRIETY

(Click on the picture to see the Supreme Court of New York First Department Orders for investigation of Rubenstein and others for conflicts of interest, violations of public offices and the appearance of impropriety)


RUBENSTEIN REPORT


WHO IS THE MPEG LA ATTORNEY AND SOLE PATENT EVALUATOR FOR THE MPEG PATENT POOL???

AND

A PROSKAUER ROSE LLP ATTORNEY, IN THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY DIVISION OF PROSKAUER FORMED IMMEDIATELY AFTER LEARNING OF THE IVIEWIT INVENTIONS?

AND

FORMER IVIEWIT PATENT COUNSEL?

AND

A FORMER IVIEWIT BOARD MEMBER?

AND

AN IVIEWIT SHAREHOLDER?

AND

WHAT DO ALL THESE HAVE IN COMMON? 

MEET KENNETH RUBENSTEIN, ESQ. OF PROSKAUER ROSE LLP


The following taped message centers on the fact that Rubenstein was busted lying under deposition, when further evidence proving he was involved with Iviewit are delivered from Christopher Wheeler to Iviewit counsel Steve Selz, proving Rubenstein lied under deposition

After production at the Labarga Circus Court and after their depositions where they ran and did everything not to have to finish, since so much perjury was already done, Proskauer drops off documents that completely contradict their own stories, our attorney cannot believe it and calls them the "holy grail" documents.  Little did we know that Labarga was dirty and would deny due process to deny the evidence from being submitted at trial, by throwing the case and preventing a trial in the most illegal way he could.  Labarga suppresses the evidence showing these guys were involved in lying about crimes against the United States in his court and under deposition.  Must have cost a bundle to buy out of this mess.

Attorney Steve Selz, Esq. taped message regarding having the goods on Rubenstein, evidence showing that he falsified statements under sworn deposition, the "holy grail" evidence against Ruby and MPEGLA


RUBENSTEIN DEPOSITION

ALL DEPOSITIONS

Proskauer now controls and inures revenue from the MPEGLA LLC patent pools through their hire of Rubenstein who created and controlled them as lead counsel and after 200 years as a real estate law firm, suddenly became a leading intellectual property firm, specializing in the exact markets Iviewit's technologies applied too.  The pools would have been rendered obsolete had Iviewit not licensed them to the pools and partnered instead with others.

Rubenstein is responsible for the illegal tying and bundling of the Iviewit technologies with his pool license, using this scheme to lift the inventions while blocking Iviewit from market through anticompetitive racketeering practices, in violation of virtually all antitrust laws.

One may ask how a law firm can inure benefits learned from client disclosures despite the massive and obvious conflict of interest.  Yes that is a question.  A question that leaves one asking how in the name of law and justice can a patent attorney put client patents in their own names and inure benefits and the law looks the other way, as if the criminals were above the law or have criminal friends in high places...


CLICK HERE FOR ANSWERS


How have these legal giants been able to avoid prosecution you ask?  The answer, the greatest infiltration of public offices in the history of the US.  Knowing that to be tried and convicted would lead to immediate loss of all their worldly possessions and lengthy, lengthy federal sentences for their crimes committed against the United States and its citizens.


COVER-UPS AND DERAILED INVESTIGATIONS ALREADY EXPOSED

1. Conflicts confirmed in the Florida Supreme Court - The Florida Bar, against acting officers and then covered up.  The cover up through brut force denial of due process by failing to formally docket and dispose of cases against those found violating public office, inapposite the Constitution of Florida and the United States regarding complaints against public officials.

Matthew Triggs of Proskauer Rose LLP, represented his Proskauer partner, Christopher Clarke Wheeler, while in a blackout period precluding his representation of any party due to his Supreme Court of Florida - The Florida Bar office position he held.  Conflicts against Triggs were confirmed by TFB and when formal complaints were filed for Triggs, TFB refused to docket them and instead of having Triggs put up his own defense, TFB attempted to exculpate him from prosecution by having Cheif Counsel of TFB, John Anthony Boggs, state that based on law (used proposed law he had just drafted claiming it was law) Triggs could have, should have asked the Board to allow his representation and they would have, maybe, allowed his representation.  It was a little more complicated as Triggs was also representing Proskauer in their phony law suit against Iviewit fraudulent company's they set up, again the conflicts were prohibitive for using his Supreme Court Florida public offices to represent a claim against Proskauer by Iviewit, while representing Proskauer in the billing case.  A total of approximately 13 conflicts and violations of public were cited.

The Supreme Court of Florida - The Florida Bar, refusal to docket the Triggs complaint and the complaints against other officers including Kelly Overstreet Johnson, President, was petitioned to The Florida Supreme Court, which of course is inherently conflicted in reviewing and or handling complaints against TFB Officers as it would affect the Florida Supreme Court D&O policy, so it is like complaining to the Chief of Police about the Chief of Police and asking him to be fair in imprisoning himself, oh yeah, that story actually comes later.  Thus, the bar association of Florida is a complete joke of corruption, no complaints survive the assault, conflicts run rampant, Justices obfuscate justice in favor of favoritism and well it should just be turned into a drinking establishment for corrupt lawyers.

The refusal of the Florida Supreme Court to hear the cases against their brethren at TFB, inapposite of law and due process led to filing a Writ of Certiorari in the United States Supreme Court.

2. The conflicts and violation of public offices by Proskauer then continues undisclosed and again are discovered in the New York Supreme Courts whereby complaints against Proskauer's New York partners were handled inapposite of the New York Constitution and the United States Constitution in regard to filing complaints against public officers.  Again, senior members of the disciplinary are found violating their public office, this time, former New York State Bar Association President, Steven C. Krane.  Krane, also in a blackout period from his NYSBA office and also a senior disciplinary figure with roles at the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division: First Department - Departmental Disciplinary Committee, handles complaints filed at the First Department by representing his Proskauer partner Rubenstein, of course failing to disclose or seek approval for his conflicts.   Krane, when caught in the act, attempts a suicide letter, whereby he claims he is not conflicted and has no role in the First Department and that former CEO Lamont and inventor Bernstein were to stupid to know the difference between the NYSBA and First Department.   Thomas Cahill, Chief Counsel of the First Department DDC, confirmed that Krane had no roles at the First Department, despite what his biography at the Proskauer Rose site said and other information pointing to Krane as a leading figure in the First Department DDC.   That went far until upon contacting the Clerk of the First Department, Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe to elevate the complaint against both Rubenstein and Krane now, Wolfe revealed that Cahill and Krane certainly must have been on triple crack when they stated Krane had no role with the DDC, as she was to attend a DDC with both of them in the evening and that she sat on several boards with both of them, making it impossible for them to claim such.  Wolfe then directed Lamont and Bernstein to file a Petition with the First Department stating that Krane and Cahill were BIG FAT LIARS, or words to that effect, and to say she said so.  Krane already signing his suicide note claiming he had no roles, well the life blood has been seeping out of his big fat lying, unethical and wholly disgusting body since.  Busted in Gotham.

So the Petition is drafted showing Cahill and Krane are BIG FAT LIARS and are conflicted and have violated their public offices.  Ok, Cahill's complaint gets turned over to Martin Gold for a Special Inquiry, which has been ongoing ever since with no word to Iviewit of the outcome of that matter.  Next, five Justices of the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division: First Department conferred and unanimously ruled, after due deliberation, to have Steven C. Krane, Kenneth Rubenstein and Raymond Joao for immediate INVESTIGATION. 

Golly Gee Batman, how did they weasel out of that one?

Well Robin, it turns out the investigating department was also fraught with corruption, conflicts and further violations of public offices. 

Holy Cow Batman, has all of Gotham's justice corrupted?  Commissioner Gordon?  

Worse yet Robin, it may elevate up to the Federal level, all the way to the, well you know, the Decider and his buddy Al at the Justice Department.  It's ok though Robin, Batman is here.

Are you corrupt Batman?  Da Da Da Da Da Da Da Daaa Batman, stay tuned for our next episode whereby corrupt officials put forth no defense in response to the court ordered investigation, as the investigators write defenses for them instead of investigating them.  In our next episode Batman faces off with Chief Judge Ma Barker aka Judith Kaye (could have been stand-in for Wicked Witch in OZ), her Proskauer husband Stephen Rakowe Kaye and her former whipping boy clerk stool, Proskauer partner Steven C. Krane.  Will Batman survive or die, will Robin split to Cleveland and will Gotham be left with Joker's running, or should we say ruining Gotham, stay tuned for our next action packed episode or you'll never know if Gotham goes to hell. 

The orders for investigation at the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division: Second Department where derailed and dismissed upon review, whereby the Second Department claimed they were under no obligation to follow the First Department court order for investigation.  Lifting the skirt of the Second Department Chief Counsel and lead non-investigator, Dianna Maxfield Kearse, revealed more spoiled rotten apples in the big apple.  Kearse after making her determination, admitted conflict with Steven C. Krane that imparted more than just the appearance of impropriety it was wholly indecent.  In fact, upon receiving a complaint against her from Iviewit, she refused to formally docket and procedurally handle her complaint.  This elevated to Lawrence DiGiovanna, Chairman of the Second Department DDC, who claimed he was ok with her conflict and did not feel the complaint should be docketed and disposed according to due process and procedure.  A complaint was filed against DiGiovanna and again, Kearse, acting still in conflict, refused to formally docket the complaint, again denying due process and procedure per their own laws.

It was upon taking the complaints to the next level, the Clerk of the Second Department, James Pelzer, on behalf of Chief Justice, A. Gail Prudenti, when it was learned that Judith Kaye, Chief Judge of the whole of the New York Court System and big part of the disciplinary committees in New York was married to, you got it, a Proskauer partner.  Not just any Proskauer partner but a partner who had been practicing for many years in like dispute resolution, who was suddenly made a partner in the newly formed Intellectual Property department, formed immediately after taking disclosures on the Iviewit inventions and funded by them ever since.  Krane also made the Intellectual Property department, you know, an ethics guy with no ethics, the biggest piece of shit in New York.  In fact, that whole department spearheaded by Rubenstein is criminally insane now

3. We can top the state corruption in the Supreme Court with the United State Supreme Court  COURT CASE #05-6611 action or shall we say inaction.  In taking the Florida Supreme Court denial to hear the matters of public officers caught violating public offices of the Florida Supreme Court, whereby other officers of the Florida Supreme Court used proposed legislation to attempt to exculpate those found violating their offices after confirming violations.  Further, other officers of that Court then refused to docket complaints against those found violating their offices.  With all that known it recently 2007 was learned that the Solicitor General of Florida at the time, a one Christopher Kise, now a Florida Partner of Foley and Lardner with a special post created for him by Governor Charlie Crist in the Governor's offices, may have been the ace in the hole or the rat in the Court that blocked Iviewit, again top down.  

With no chance of Justice in Florida, one may ask how Iviewit fared at the Supreme's well they just gave a one line denial to hear the case, leaving Iviewit with no way to file complaints against Florida Supreme Court officers caught violating their public offices, reminiscent of Russia of yesteryear.  No victory for either side in the Florida court or the Supreme's but a complete denial of due process and procedure, a stonewalling of justice by Justices.  Perhaps again why Sandra Day and others are getting death threats if they rule on cases or just getting the hell out of the Justice of Corruption claiming we are in the throes of a dictatorship.


READ THE SUPREME JOKE OF A RULING TO TRY AND STONEWALL THE PROBLEMS


Again, no victory for either in Court but the denial of due process and procedure is an effective way to preclude the shareholders and inventors from filing complaints against corrupt public officials and blowing the lid right there and then.  The refusal to docket and dispose of complaints against public officers is diametrically opposed to the intent of the Florida Constitution and the United States Constitution by those who are supposed to be upholding it. 

The whole case is soon to be appealed when fair and impartial due process again returns to the Courts and with new evidence the case will have more fodder discovered after filing the original.


THE GREAT CONSPIRACY LINKS


4. Boca Raton PD.  This investigation or shall we say, this investigation should be about how not investigate while telling everyone you are.  Boca Police Department begins investigations and then loses them.  They state the SEC is co-investigating the claims and the SEC denies such.  They begin an internal affairs review which lingers on.

READ ALL ABOUT BOCA PD DENIAL OF DUE PROCESS AND OTHER FODDER


5. VIRGINIA BAR COMPLAINT AGAINST WILLIAM DICK

Yes, this document is over a thousand pages, chalk full of evidence and witness against Foley and Lardner partner Dick Dick.  Even after the Virginia Bar learns that the USPTO and the USPTO-OED are starting investigation based on the intellectual property sheet Dick Dick provided to the Virginia Bar in his defense because it contains factually incorrect owners, assignees, etc. the Virginia Bar refused to investigate.  Can you imagine, the Federal Patent Bar is investigating based on the docket submitted to the Virginia Bar by Dick, and they refuse to investigate or even wait for the determination of the Federal Patent Bar.

SOON TO BE APPEALED

READ WILLIAM (DICK) J. DICK VIRGINIA BAR COMPLAINT


RAYMOND JOAO

CHECK OUT RAYMOND JOAO CLAIMING HE HAS 90 PATENTS IN HIS NAME, THIS IS A PATENT ATTORNEY WHO WORKED WITH RUBENSTEIN TO STEAL THE PATENTS IN AN ORGY OF CRIME.  JOAO IS THE SLIMIEST THING EVER TO TAKE AN OATH BEFORE THE PATENT BAR, A MERE CRIMINAL

Once caught and trying to cover up, Joao's law firms fax machine and Utley's assistant, are changed to try and match the current date.  Instead both fax machines are set to March 19, one fax machine is set to the year 1900 and the other to 2020!  THIS ACTUALLY IS ON FILE WITH THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

IVIEWIT PATENT FILED WITH FAX DATED HEADERS IN THE YEARS 1900 AND 2020


MEET STEVEN C. KRANE

STEPHEN KRANE - FORMER PRESIDENT OF THE NEW YORK BAR

 AND YOU GUESSED IT

PROSKAUER ROSE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY PARTNER.

ORDERED FOR INVESTIGATION BY THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK - 5 JUSTICES FIRST DEPARTMENT

(Click on the picture to see the most influential member of the New York Disciplinary and former President of the New York State Bar, ordered for investigation by the very department he has public office with for conflicts of interest and the appearance of impropriety)


KRANE REPORT


So Steven C. Krane, Porksauers finest porker, traif, yudenrat to the core if you can cut through the fat.  Krane is a disgrace to everything ethical since Socrates first penned it.  So Krane, while an officer of the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division: First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee handles his Proskauer Partner Rubenstein's complaint and fails to disclose his position.  Further, as former President of the NYSBA Krane was precluded for handling any disciplinary matters during a blackout period following his position.  Further, upon a formal complaint against Krane, First Dept DDC, Chief Counsel Thomas Cahill tells Iviewit contrary to Krane's own Proskauer Bio and other damning evidence that Krane is not involved at the First Dept DDC.  Krane writes his suicide note claiming he has no roles, when upon moving the complaint to the next highest level for investigation, Clerk of the First Department, Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe busts both of them by stating they are liars, as she has a First Department DDC committee meeting that night with both of them attending in official capacity both know of the others roles.  Wolfe directs Iviewit to file a Petition with the Justices of the First Department citing the conflicts and evidence and the Justices, after due deliberation, unanimously vote to move the complaints and begin an immediate investigation of Krane, Rubenstein and Joao.  Cahill gets sent to a Special Inquiry by Martin Gold, who appears to have fell off the planet after receiving the job.

Ok, so how does the slimy grotesque beast of Satan's ethics department wiggle that large ass out of this one.  Well, the answer is obvious, to have more friends in conflict assigned to investigate him at the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division: Second Department - Departmental Disciplinary Committee (I hate writing these names as much as you hate reading them).  The Chief Counsel, Dianna Maxwell Kearse, after admitting that she failed to do any investigation what so ever as ordered by the five Justices then admits when asked that she has a bit of conflict with Steven Krane.  The rest of the chain of command at the Second Department aided and abetted the denial of the court ordered investigation, many in further conflict.  It was here that it was learned that Chief Judge of the New York Courts, Judge Judith Kaye was married to Proskauer partner and Krane was her former clerk.  No wonder the investigation was derailed, whereby the accused never put forward a defense for themselves, no witnesses were contacted and no evidence tested.  Iviewit went and complained to federal investigators who were supposed to be investigating all this amongst the hundreds of other crimes committed in connection with Iviewit until recently when the FBI appears to have lost the case files and the investigator was claimed to have retired with the missing files.

Sandra Day O'Connor, nominated by Ronald Reagan as the first woman supreme court justice, declared: "We must be ever-vigilant against those who would strong-arm the judiciary."

She pointed to autocracies in the developing world and former Communist countries as lessons on where interference with the judiciary might lead. "It takes a lot of degeneration before a country falls into dictatorship, but we should avoid these ends by avoiding these beginnings."

O'Connor Decries Republican Attacks on Courts

by  

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5255712

Morning Edition, March 10, 2006 · Newly retired Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor took on conservative Republican critics of the courts in a speech Thursday. She told an audience at Georgetown University that Republican proposals, and their sometimes uncivil tone, pose a danger to the independence of the judiciary, and the freedoms of all Americans.


Former Top Judge Says US Risks Edging Near to Dictatorship
· Sandra Day O'Connor warns of rightwing attacks
· Lawyers 'must speak up' to protect judiciary

Published on Monday, March 13, 2006 by the Guardian / UK

by Julian Borger

Sandra Day O'Connor, a Republican-appointed judge who retired last month after 24 years on the supreme court, has said the US is in danger of edging towards dictatorship if the party's rightwingers continue to attack the judiciary.

In a strongly worded speech at Georgetown University, reported by National Public Radio and the Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Ms O'Connor took aim at Republican leaders whose repeated denunciations of the courts for alleged liberal bias could, she said, be contributing to a climate of violence against judges.

Ms O'Connor, nominated by Ronald Reagan as the first woman supreme court justice, declared: "We must be ever-vigilant against those who would strong-arm the judiciary."

She pointed to autocracies in the developing world and former Communist countries as lessons on where interference with the judiciary might lead. "It takes a lot of degeneration before a country falls into dictatorship, but we should avoid these ends by avoiding these beginnings."

In her address to an audience of corporate lawyers on Thursday, Ms O'Connor singled out a warning to the judiciary issued last year by Tom DeLay, the former Republican leader in the House of Representatives, over a court ruling in a controversial "right to die" case.

After the decision last March that ordered a brain-dead woman in Florida, Terri Schiavo, removed from life support, Mr DeLay said: "The time will come for the men responsible for this to answer for their behaviour."

Mr DeLay later called for the impeachment of judges involved in the Schiavo case, and called for more scrutiny of "an arrogant, out-of-control, unaccountable judiciary that thumbed their nose at Congress and the president".

Such threats, Ms O'Connor said, "pose a direct threat to our constitutional freedom", and she told the lawyers in her audience: "I want you to tune your ears to these attacks ... You have an obligation to speak up.

"Statutes and constitutions do not protect judicial independence - people do," the retired supreme court justice said.

She noted death threats against judges were on the rise and added that the situation was not helped by a senior senator's suggestion that there might be a connection between the violence against judges and the decisions they make.

The senator she was referring to was John Cornyn, a Bush loyalist from Texas, who made his remarks last April, soon after a judge was shot dead in an Atlanta courtroom and the family of a federal judge was murdered in Illinois.

Senator Cornyn said: "I don't know if there is a cause and effect connection, but we have seen some recent episodes of courthouse violence in this country ... And I wonder whether there may be some connection between the perception in some quarters, on some occasions, where judges are making political decisions yet are unaccountable to the public, that it builds up and builds up to the point where some people engage in violence."

Although appointed by a Republican, Ms O'Connor voted with the supreme court's liberals on some divisive issues, including abortion, making her a frequent target for criticism from the right. After announcing that she intended to retire last year at the age of 75, she was replaced in February this year by Samuel Alito, who is generally regarded as being more consistently conservative.

In her speech, Ms O'Connor said that if the courts did not occasionally make politicians mad they would not be doing their jobs, and their effectiveness "is premised on the notion that we won't be subject to retaliation for our judicial acts".


MEET MICHAEL GREBE
(aka Grubby or Goebbels)

The Man (who hides behind the scenes) Who Ruined America

FORMER CEO FOLEY AND LARDNER, CURRENTLY AT THE BRADLEY FOUNDATION (FAR FAR RIGHT WING NUTCASES) AND FORMER REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE (RNC - THE ONES WHO SET UP A BACKCHANNEL TO THE WHITEHOUSE WHERE MANY EMAILS ARE MISSING THAT CONGRESS WANTS AND THE RNC HAS REFUSED).

 It appears that Porksour's partner in this crime,  Foley and Lardner, was controlled at time of invention theft by none other than Michael Grebe, aka Goebbels, another who will be accorded a place in history as a loser (like his idol Hitler, makes you wonder why anyone idolizes a loser) who helped ruin America, through corruption under the disguise of law and order.   Mike was Chief Counsel of the Republican National Committee (RNC), oh yeah, they are the guys who just got a subpoena from the Judiciary Committee of the United States Congress for missing emails in relation to the Alberto Gonzales mess of firings, leading to another chip at the corruptions at the top of our wholly corrupted government, stave a few brave people trying to save our country from the abomination we have become.  Mike also funds author's of books like, The Bell Curve, that claims that blacks are mentally inferior to whites through his Bradley Foundation (for all those who really want to learn about the Cancer that plagues America TRY THIS LINK or visit the end of this page, where all Mike's contributions and those  he failed to report are listed in full with his friends in blood red.  Mike also heavily funds American Enterprise Institute ) Grebe is working to a New World Order, where everyone is a slave to him and his NeoCon Whitebread freakballs who seem more like Hitler Youth on steroids; other Bradley grantees include the Education Foundation; the Hoover Institute on War, Revolution, and Peace; and the Ronald Reagan Presidential Foundation. There are the major conservative publications, such as The Public Interest, The National Interest, and The American Spectator. And there are organizations set up to play specific roles in promoting the right-wing agenda, such as the Institute for Justice, a public interest law firm that promotes privatization and deregulation, and the National Center for Neighborhood Enterprise, a vehicle for building support for privatization in low-income communities. Perhaps it is he who engineered how to flood New Orleans, then how to avoid a response, then how to let blacks die in the attic and now how to buy up their land.  I mean they are mentally inferior according to his study he paid a Harvard whitey to write for a 250,000 grant.  This guy photo ops himself at black catholic schools to promote his school voucher plan, which is a plan to get the "inferior blacks" out of schools and back to slavery.  I mean do the research on this guy and you find that although he belongs to think tanks and Neocon groups that are all named flowery things and misnomers for what they truly are, each of these organizations he belongs to is right wing gone mad.  My technologies not only provided the funding for this shit but the impetus to executed the whole New World Order agenda and these were gifts from G0d to help your children and they converted them in sin for sin.  I feel personally responsible for much of the atrocities going on as it was my stuff that pushed the brewing generational assault by two different groups, The Federalist and the Skull & Boneheads.  

Anyhooy, how does this play into Iviewit and our condemnation of Foley? Well imagine if you have on one side Proskauer with strong democratic positioning, working with Foley who controls the RNC through Grebe, one of the most powerful and influential Republicans, and you decide to find a candidate that can fill the suit of a Republican and at the same time partner up with you in crime, all you need to do is add a bit of election fraud to insure you get your boys in.  Grebe backed Bush II., like he has backed several Republicans (Reagan & Bush I) and in those presidencies we also went to war with oil nations, had Iran Contra, The Gulf War and all this other Nazi like shit America has been led into as an aggressor nation, look deep at this man for he ruined America almost single handedly.  This is a behind the scenes man in the corruption of government, law and everything those things stand for, a man who has found a way to rob the patent office through corrupt lawyers.  Grebe cares not for either political party, he infiltrated the Republican Party and has henceforth ruined it, it is time Republican's realize they have been overtaken by Nazi like freaks like Grebe and get honor back to the Grand Ole Party.  All Grebe cares about is his Federalist Agenda and he is the key to Federalism/Nazism in America and abroad, he is a behind the scenes Commander, a Vietnam Vet gone mad, who hates America and the freedoms afforded to the people as it does not fit his New World Order plan where you are his slave.  Mike is probably the guy who has been rewriting the Constitution to take your personal freedoms in things like the Patriot Act, a man who believes in Gitmoschwitz and human torture and all those good things America is now disgraced in.  Mike hides behind the scenes because he is a coward.  Mike's former law firm, Foley and Lardner, is involved in robbing the Patent Office and robbing their clients, I would be very careful of giving any inventions to their firm of total losers.

Another caution, the New World Order begins with an enhanced World War III, a catalyst event bigger than 9/11 that puts America into real war with real large scale enemies, all good for the illegal war profiteering, thinning the population and gaining world domination.  I am not kidding, these guys believe in this and they have seized the country to execute the plan.  Do not be surprised if as you try to take them out of power, they wield power in an attempt to gain further control of our system through fear, the

Some Mikey Links & Other Stuff Regarding His New World Order Bullshit

 


Fascist Plot to Overthrow the United States by the likes of Bush's grandpa Prescott and the plot to overthrow Roosevelt.

The Dark Heart Of Fascism In The United States
The Whitehouse Coup

BBC Audio Documentary

Document uncovers details of a planned coup in the USA in 1933 by right-wing Americans.

The coup was aimed at toppling President Franklin D Roosevelt with the help of half-a-million war veterans. The plotters, who were alleged to involve some of the most famous families in America, (owners of Heinz, Birds Eye, Goodtea, Maxwell Hse & George Bush’s Grandfather, Prescott) believed that their country should adopt the policies of Hitler and Mussolini to beat the great depression.

Mike Thomson investigates why so little is known about this biggest ever peacetime threat to American democracy.

1933 Attempted Coup on Franklin Roosevelt

Click Here for Full Story


After listening to that, look at the next article to see how Proskauer Rose and Joseph Proskauer (Nazi disguised as Jew) were part of the plot.  We learn here how these New World Order / Skull & Boneheads really operate.  They are not beholden to anything higher than these secret cult clubs they bond with in gay ways (no offense to homosexuals meant).  Therefore, one may ask how could a Jew be called a Nazi, it is because Jew is second to the NWO / SB values.  They infiltrate all religions, all political parties and virtually all social outlets, looking and appearing as one of you, with a secret plan though.  They intend to destroy that which you belong, whether Jew, Hispanic, White, Black, Democrat, Republican, Catholic, Christian, they want to incite you to hate each other, it feeds their goal.  Just look around, this is what plagues America.


 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G4-TL5AGHFY

/HTTP://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dJBxdRIQx7Y  

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BbnpN07J_zg 

Waterboarding - We should stand proud behind our country and its leaders who believe in this.  I have never prouder to be an American.

 

http://youtube.com/watch?v=-GcXl1y_mQw

http://youtube.com/watch?v=-GcXl1y_mQw 

 

July 30, 2007 Jerusalem Post - Joseph Proskauer Aids Nazi cause, lets Jews die in concentration camps, hiding knowledge that camps existed.

www.coat.ncf.ca/our_magazine/links/53/proskauer.html

or this one

Non Zionist and Zionist in America

or this one

Joseph Proskauer named stooge in plot to kill FDR


July 11, 2005

Julian Bond continues his persona vendetta against conservatives

NAACP Chairman Julian Bond opened the NAACP's national convention in Milwaukee as he has other such gatherings in the past -- by attacking George W. Bush and other conservatives.

The NAACP's national confab got underway yesterday in Milwaukee. Bond took the opportunity to take swipes at Bush and others, of course, reserving special venom for black conservatives.

Bond opened with an attack, saying, "Milwaukee is the home of beer, of brats and the Bradley Foundation," and blasting Bush for failing to appear at the NAACP's annual convention for the fifth straight year.

Bond explained his reference to the Milwaukee-based Bradley Foundation later in the speech, saying it is among entities that fund what he called "fraudulent" civil rights organizations.

He charged that the organizations appear to back civil rights but push school vouchers, use legal means to assault affirmative action and try to redraw political boundaries in hopes of preventing people of color from being elected to office.

Such organizations have had black "hucksters" on their payrolls for 20 years, said Bond to thunderous applause.

"Like ventriloquist dummies, they speak in their puppet master's voice, but we can see his lips moving," he said.

Similarly, Bond fired at organizations that have tried to "seduce black clergy" to conservative causes and criticized what he said is an attempt by the Bush administration to replace vital public welfare programs with faith-based organizations.

He gave special importance to the continuing battle over Bush's judicial nominees, especially a replacement for retiring Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, saying the high court needs another independent-minded justice like her. Too many Bush nominees to federal judgeships have made rulings that hurt the civil rights movement, he said, calling newly named federal appeals court judge Janice Rogers Brown "the female Clarence Thomas."

The former Democratic Georgia state senator blasted the Republican-controlled U.S. Senate for failing to hold a roll call vote on a resolution apologizing for failing to enact an anti-lynching law first proposed 105 years ago. He named eight Republican senators who did not co-sponsor the resolution, saying, "If a United States senator in 2005 cannot apologize for that, what outrage is deserving of an apology?"

Targeting the Bush administration, Bond said it was "outsourcing torture" by sending terrorism suspects to foreign lands and backing economic policies that have created "an ownership society, where you're really on your own."

"They profess to being true believers, but they're really true deceivers," he said.


Grebe Nazi Links


Grebe 1


Grebe 2


Grebe 3


Grebe 4


Grebe Backs Bush and Bush Nazi Links


Here's where and who Mike has been hanging out with lately to turn America into garbage after ruining Foley and Lardner, then the RNC and now Charity @ The Bradley Foundation of right wing gone to Heart of Darkness

Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation - Michael Grebe

One of the country's largest and most influential right-wing foundations, the Bradley Foundation is known for its clearly articulated political and ideological vision. In addition to providing funding for a host of right-wing organizations, Bradley contributes to conservative and often highly controversial scholarship, publications and "academic" research aimed at legitimizing far-right policy positions.

Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation
PO Box 510860
Milwaukee, WI 53203-0153
Website: www.bradleyfdn.org

Established: 1942
President/CEO: Michael W. Grebe
Board of Directors: Thomas L. Rhodes (Chairman), Reed Coleman (Vice-Chairman), Michael Grebe, William L. Armstrong, and more.
Finances: $665,329,753 (2004) assets
Grants awarded, annually: $33,332,537 (2004) grants awarded
Employees: 20
Publications: The Lion Letter, annual reports outlining contributions and donations
Formerly known as: Allen-Bradley Foundation
Prize Recipients 2005: George F. Will (syndicated columnist), Ward Connerly (anti-affirmative action, founder of American Civil Rights Institute), Heather McDonald (Olin fellow at the Manhattan Institute), and Robert P. George (professor, former presidential appointee to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights).

Principal Issues

  • The Bradley Foundation is one of the largest philanthropic foundations responsible for the financial backing of the right-wing agenda for nearly twenty years.
     

  • Bradley’s philanthropy supports right-wing organizations, privatized educational programs, as well as many non-partisan social programs and civic organizations.
     

  • Issues Bradley supports include: private school vouchers, faith-based social services, and welfare reform.
     

  • According to Bradley, the projects sponsored by the foundation “encourage improved government, a more vital sense of citizenship, and a strong belief in personal responsibility.”
     

  • Bradley has been accused of underreporting the grant amounts that it gives to many of the right-wing organizations that it supports.

Activities

Bradley has made right-wing inroads in academia by establishing chairmanship positions, undergraduate and graduate programs, fellowships, and whole departments at many prestigious universities including: Boston College, Boston University, Bowling Green State University, Carnegie Mellon University, Catholic University, Columbia University, Georgetown University, George Mason University, Harvard University, Johns Hopkins University, Kenyon College, Marquette University, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Michigan State University, New York University, Princeton University, Stanford University, University of California- Berkeley, University of California- Los Angeles, University of California- San Diego, University of Chicago, University of Michigan, University of Notre Dame, University of Pennsylvania, University of Virginia, University of Wisconsin, and Washington University- St. Louis.

Bradley has supported and in some cases, had to defend controversial right-wing recipients of their grants, particularly Charles Murray and Dinesh D’Souza.

Charles Murray - Murray, author of “The Bell Curve,” which argues that intelligence is predicated on race, and “Losing Ground,” whose thesis is that social programs should be abolished. Murray’s work was so controversial and objectionable that the right-wing Manhattan Institute, supported by Bradley and for which he worked, asked him to leave. However, the Bradley Foundation stood by him because Murray, according to former Bradley President Michael Joyce, “is one of the foremost social thinkers in the country.” Bradley extended Murray’s $100,000 per year grant when he went to the American Enterprise Institute.
Dinesh D’Souza - D’Souza, in his book, “The End of Racism,” attempts to absolve Whites from discrimination against Blacks during slavery, claiming that Blacks were too uncivilized to be a part of society anyway.

List of Right-Wing Grantees

Acton Institute for the Study of Religion and Liberty
Alexis de Tocqueville Institution
American Civil Rights Institute
American Civil Rights Union
American Conservative Union Foundation
American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research
Becket Fund
Black Alliance for Educational Options (BAEO)
Capital Research Center
Center for Individual Rights
Center for Education Reform
Center for Public Justice
Center for the Study of Popular Culture
Children’s Educational Opportunity Foundation America
Citizens for the Preservation of Constitutional Rights
Claremont Institute for the Study of Statesmanship and Political Philosophy
Collegiate Network
Competitive Enterprise Institute
Empire Foundation for Policy Research
Evergreen Freedom Foundation
Equal Opportunity Foundation
Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy Studies
Fellowship of Christian Athletes
Friends of Choice in Urban Schools
Free Congress Research and Education Foundation
Galen Institute
Heartland Institute
Heritage Foundation
Hudson Institute
Hoover Institute
Institute for American Values
Institute for Justice
Leadership Institute
Mackinac Center for Public Policy

Manhattan Institute for Policy Research
National Association of Scholars
National Center for Policy Analysis
Pacific Research Institute for Public Policy
Thomas B. Fordham Institute

 President Bush on the Bradley Foundation

“The reason that I am so happy that my friend Mike Grebe is here and Mike Joyce and others from The Bradley Foundation is because "Foundation America" must be a part of the revitalization of our communities as well. And The Bradley Foundation has always been willing to see different solutions. They have been willing to challenge the status quo. They say where we find failure, something else must occur. And the Foundation not only has been kind and generous with its donations, the Foundation also has been willing to help people think anew, and I appreciate you all coming. I am honored you're here and thanks for your good work.”
– President George W. Bush,
speaking at the Bradley Foundation-supported Holy Redeemer Institutional Church of God in Christ, Milwaukee, July 2002.


Bradley Foundation Under Reports Grants and to whom


Recipient/description #unreported grants Total unreported amount
American Council of Trustees and Alumni 2 100,000
American Enterprise Institute 2 405,000
American Foreign Policy Council 1 18,750
American Jewish Committee
(Commentary fund)
1 37,500
American Spectator Education Foundation
("special projects" )
1 42,500
American Studies Center 1 25,000
Argus Project 1 56,250
Association of Literary Scholars and Critics 1 12,500
Becket Fund, Inc. 2 84,000
University of Wisconsin
(evaluation of Wisconsin Works welfare reform)
3 206,250
Boston College 5 144,296
Boston University 1 50,000
Boys & Girls Club of Greater Milwaukee, Inc. 1 25,000
Capital Research Center 1 28,375
Carnegie Mellon University 4 170,000
Catholic University of America 1 49,505
Cato Institute 1 37,500
Center for Individual Rights 2 70,000
Center for Parental Freedom in Education 2 50,000
Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments 1 25,000
Center for the Study of Popular Culture 3 337,500
CESA Foundation, Inc. 1 1,000
Christian Methodist Episcopal Church 1 50,000
Citizens for a Sound Economy Foundation

1

12,500
Claremont Graduate University 1 15,000
Claremont Institute for the Study of Statesmanship. 4 187,500
Claremont McKenna College 1 15,000
Collegiate Network 1 80,000
Columbia University 1 15,000
Community Enterprises of Greater Milwaukee, Inc. 4 133,000
Competitive Enterprise Institute 1 20,000
Corporation for the Advancement of Policy Evaluation 1 25,000
Discovery World: James Lovell 2 50,000
Empire Foundation for Policy Research 1 25,000
Environmental Defense Fund 2 77,000
Esperanza Unida, Inc. 1 37,500
Ethics and Public Policy Center, Inc. 3 243,750
Family House Incorporated 1 36,250
Family Service of Milwaukee 3 150,000
Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy Studies 2 90,000
First Stage Milwaukee 2 22,500
Florentine Opera Company, Inc. 1 50,000
Fordham University 1 25,000
Foundation for Cultural Review 3 115,000
Foundation Saint-Simon (Paris) 1 15,000
Free Congress Research and Education Foundation 2 284,000
Freedom House, Inc. 2 100,000
Fund for American Studies 1 25,000
George C. Marshall Institute

2

107,000
George Mason University Foundation 3 45,000
Georgetown University 2 30,000
Harvard University 5 107,500
Heritage Foundation 4 581,250
Houghton College 1 31,786
Hudson Institute 7 319,213
Indiana University 2 50,000
Institut Fur Die Wissenschaften Vom Menschen 1 40,000
Institute for American Values 1 50,000
Institute for Contemporary Studies 3 158,500
Institute for International Economics 1 25,000
Institute for International Studies 2 134,000
Institute for Justice 1 60,000
Institute for Policy Innovation 1 37,500
Institute on Religion and Democracy, Inc. 1 25,000
Institute on Religion and Public Life 4 296,250
Intercollegiate Studies Institute 1 45,000
International Center for Economic Growth 1 50,000
International Republican Institute 1 25,000
Johns Hopkins University 10 410,275
Kenyon College 1 15,000
Libro Libre 1 20,000
Manhattan Institute for Public Policy 2 100,000
Marquette University 2 120,000
Medical College of Wisconsin 1 20,000
MHS., Inc. Messmer High School 3 150,000
Michigan State University 2 30,000
Middle East Forum 1 22,500
Milwaukee Area Technical College Foundation, Inc. 3 150,000
Milwaukee Art Museum 1 25,000
Milwaukee Ballet Company 1 50,000
Milwaukee Brewers Student Achievers Account 1 48,251
Milwaukee County War Memorial Center, Inc. 4 350,000
Milwaukee Foundation 1 25,000
Milwaukee Kickers Soccer Club Foundation, Inc. 1 12,500
Milwaukee Repertory Theater, Inc. 2 60,000
Milwaukee Rescue Mission 1 12,500
Milwaukee School of Engineering 3 225,000
Milwaukee Youth Symphony Orchestra 1 12,500
MMAC Community Support Foundation 1 32,475
Morley Institute 1 62,500
National Affairs>
(Public Interest, National Interest)
2 175,000
National Association of Scholars 1 75,000
National Bureau of Economic Research 3 150,000
National Center for Neighborhood Enterprise 13 282,000
National Center for Policy Analysis 1 50,000
National Council for History Education, Inc. 2 64,448
National Endowment for Democracy 3 115,000
National Fatherhood Initiative 2 90,000
National Forum Foundation 1 37,500
National Strategy Information Center 2 117,500
New Citizenship Project, Inc. 1 25,000
New York University 3 65,000
Next Door Foundation 1 25,000
Nixon Center 1 37,500
Our Lady of the Lakes Catholic School 1 3,000
Pacific Research Institute for Public Policy 1 37,500
Partners Advancing Values in Education (PAVE) 3 1,700,000
Penfield Children's Center 1 20,000
Peterhouse College 1 10,000
Progressive Foundation 1 25,000
Puebla Institute 1 35,000
Reason Foundation 1 37,500
Roper Center for Public Opinion Research 2 123,000
St Camillus Ministries, Inc. 1 50,000
St. Francis Children's Center 1 20,000
St. Mary's and St. Nicholas Joint Education... 1 3,000
Salvation Army Wisconsin & Upper Michigan 1 17,500
Sand County Foundation 1 55,000
Skylight Opera Theatre Corp 1 30,000
Social Philosophy and Policy Foundation 2 84,000
St. Leo School, Inc. 1 10,000
State of Wisconsin
"legal fees in defense of const. of the amended Milwaukee School Choice program"
1 50,000
Taliesin Preservation Commission, Inc. 1 25,000
Texas A & M University 2 82,500
Thomas Aquinas College 1 50,000
Thoreau Institute 1 22,500
TransCenter for Youth, Inc. 1 50,000
United Negro College Fund, Inc. 1 25,000
University of California-Irvine 1 33,903
University of California-Malibu 1 17,500
University of California-Berkely 1 15,000
University of Chicago 7 105,000
University of Maryland Foundation 2 78,000
University of Notre Dame 1 15,000
University of Oklahoma 1 15,000
University of Toronto 2 30,000
University of Virginia 3 45,000
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee 1 75,000
UWM Foundation 2 97,900
Washington University 1 15,000
Wisconsin Center for Academically Talented Youth 2 92,500
Wisconsin Conservatory of Music 1 17,500
Wisconsin Correctional Service 1 25,000
Wisconsin Foundation for Independent Colleges, Inc. 1 12,500
Wisconsin Policy Research Institute, Inc. 1 200,000
Wisconsin Public Radio 1 1,500
Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars 1 31,500
Yale University 2 50,000
Youth Leadership Academy 3 60,000
     
Total unreported grants   13,058,677

 


Now understanding that Bradley funds Yale for his Federalist ideology to brainwash young greed centered children who probably would not have got into Yale without substantial daddy donations, we see a link as to how two organizations steeped in separate plots against the United States came together into one New World Order plot run by spoiled kids and their parents who spoil them wanting to create wealth of kings by hording it all and screwing the middle and poor classes. 

What is frightening is that they have taken advantage of American's who are used to saying your such a conspiracy theorist, no plot could be in play by the rich people who are so nice to the poor.   I think the next You Tube debate question should be:

As candidate for the next President to take oath of office to and for the People,

1.please announce any/all allegiances or oaths to any other organization that you have sworn public or private oath to, including any Federalist organizations, secret organizations such as Skull and Bones, fraternal organizations, etc.

2.who are your ten largest political campaign contributors and briefly describe the special interests behind them?

3.if you were President would you endorse legislation that would make it a crime tried by treason for any public employee who falsifies information or fails to disclose membership to any group that has dissimilar interests to the People and upholding the Constitutional sworn too?

4. if you were President how would you have handled the Libby situation which is a stain on American Justice and the Presidency?


How much does this next piece sound like Nazi Germany, with 9/11 leading to Patriot Act, leading to humanitarian rights violations and the removal of Habeus Corpus as similar, almost step by step, to the Nazi master plan.

Edited from Wikipedia (listed as a skull member on politicalfriendster.com) from the entry on Adolph Hitler and his rise to power).  We cannot let history repeat itself.

"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."

Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759

US author, diplomat, inventor, physicist, politician, & printer (1706 - 1790)

Having become Chancellor, Hitler [Bush Grebe Cheney] foiled all attempts to gain a majority in parliament and on that basis [committed election fraud] persuaded President Hindenburg to dissolve the Reichstag again. Elections were scheduled for early March, but on 27 February 1933, the Reichstag building was set on fire.[26] [9/11 Twin Towers, although there were three, the Pentagon, etc.] Since a Dutch independent communist was found in the building, [not sure any bodies were ever found of the supposed terrorists, rumble was quickly removed for new building that is, need some spin there] the fire was blamed on a Communist plot ["Terrorist" Plot by deck of cards terrorists (52 thugs mainly funded by Bush's father, Hussein & Bin Laden, America so scared of these 52 guys that we sold our freedoms to the bs propaganda spun @ cnn, fox and payollastream media] to which the government reacted with the Reichstag Fire Decree [Patriot Act] of 28 February which suspended basic rights, including habeas corpus [that came later in this plot but the Patriot removed all the other important ones first]. Under the provisions of this decree, the German Communist Party and other groups were suppressed [Democrats & Republicans alike], and communist functionaries and deputies were arrested [shot gunned in the face, the AG/SS at your bedside, threats to Supreme Court justices, concentration camp Gitmoschwitz set up for dissenters] put to flight, or murdered.

Campaigning continued, with the Nazis making use of paramilitary violence [immediately after 9/11 attacking a country that had nothing to do with terrorists, only Saddam who factually hated and killed terrorists, gotta give these guys credit for spinning AL QAEDA into Iraq or 9/11 based on forged and false propaganda], anti-Communist hysteria [anti Muslim, Chinese Poisoning the Chinese Food, Mexican's as humans capable only of jobs Hitler's boys won't do and anti-American dissenters who do not go along with Decider decisions], and the government's resources for propaganda [CNN, FOX, etc] On election day, 6 March, the NSDAP increased its result to 43.9% of the vote, remaining the largest party, but its victory was marred by its failure to secure an absolute majority, necessitating maintaining a coalition with the DNVP.[27]

Removal of remaining limits

With this combination of legislative and executive power, Hitler's government further suppressed the remaining political opposition. The KPD and the SPD were banned, while all other political parties dissolved themselves. Labour unions were merged with employers' federations into an organisation under Nazi control, and the autonomy of German state governments was abolished.

MORE EVIDENCE OF THE CONSPIRATORIAL SUBVERSION OF OUR COUNTRY


Surf with Vision

IVIEWIT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Home | ABOUT | COMPANY | FINANCIAL INFO | INVENTORS | PRESS | PRESS ROOM | PRODUCTS | SUPREME COURT | VIDEO GALLERY | IMAGE GALLERY | SENATE CULT BILL | The Fight for the Grail | Research | Iviewit Blogoshpere



 

Special Thanks To
Leslie Abbagliato
Alec B. Abbott and Sherry
Sonny Abelardo
Mohammad Ahmed
Air Apparent Travel Inc. - Employee Pool
Barney Allison
Tom Ames
Anderson Howard Employee Pool
Kenneth Anderson
Lesli Arbuthnot
Armstrong Hirsch Jackoway Tyerman & Wertheimer, P.C.
James  Armstrong
Penelope Ashkenazy
Severyn Ashkenazy
Robert and Robin Bader
Sara Courtney Baker
Vincent Bank
Lori Barrenneck
Barry Becker & Stacy and Children
Blaze Benham
Daniel Elijsha Abe Ottomo Bernstein,
David Bernstein and Annika and Children
Eliot I. Bernstein and Candice and Children
Irene Bernstein
Jacob Noah Archie Bernstein, formerly The Jacob Bernstein 1999 Trust
Joshua Ennio Zander Bernstein, formerly The Joshua Bernstein 1999 Trust
Mark Bernstein
Simon L. Bernstein and Shirley Bernstein
Stanley Bernstein & Charlotte
Stephen Bernstein
Theodore Bernstein and Children
Bieler @ Bieler Bros. Records
Beverly & Chip Billotti
Bleemusic Inc.
Blue Fiddle Records
Redjem Bouhenguel
Frank Brady
Jennifer Brandon
Charles Brunelas
Frank Burnham
Edward Butler
C. Allen Produtions
John Calkins & Rebecca
John Campion
Edmund Campion
Tony Castro and Children
Charles Chavez
Douglas Chey
Tony Chirino
Tim Clark
James Cohen
Karen & Laurie Cohen
David Colter
John E. Cookman, Jr.
Amber Cordero
Jenna Cowman
Megan Crawford
Crush Music Media Management
Patricia Daniels
John Davis & Gregg Davis (on behalf of Marvin & Barbara Davis)
Lisa Deleo
George DiBedart
Andrew Dietz and Donna Dietz and Children
Chris Dittner & Cori
Diversafest LLC [DFEST]
Matt Doyle and Michelle
Bill Dusha
Stacey Ellis
Noble Engle
Erika R. Lewin
Evolution Promotions
Robert Feigenbaum
Joseph Fischman
Flecktones Tours LLC
Sherri  Frazier & Children
Monte Freidkin
Anthony Frenden
Jeffrey Friedstein @ Goldman Sachs and Lisa and Children
Brian Fritz
Fueled By Ramen Inc.
Mark W. Gaffney, Esq.
Aubrie Gailet
John Galvin
Edward Garber
Joe Garlipp
Maxemillion Gaspari
William George
Anthony Giordano
Melissa Gluzband
Steve Gold
James Goldstein & Christine
Gregory Gonsalves
Joel Gonsalves & Robin and Children
Thaddeus Gonsalves and Judy and Children
Frank Gonzales & Renee
Sal Gorge
Mitchell Gorman
Jason Gregg
Dale Grimes & Carol Groves
Lorna Grote and Christopher
Robert Guccione
Lisa Hagen
Molly DeKolb Hale and Todd
Leah Hanes
Happy Feet Living Trust
Ellen DeGeneres
Hard Head Management
Heche Trust
Anne Heche
Lisa Hendricks
Jon K. Hirschtick
Larry Holfer
Dr. Marcel Horowitz & Florence
Brett Howard
I Hate Kate
Guy Iantoni
Jill Iantoni
In DeGoot
Indivision Management
INVESTECH Holdings LLC –
H. Wayne Huizenga
H. Wayne Huizenga Jr.
Irell & Manella
Iviewit Charitable Giving Fund (Thought Journal)
James  Jackoway, Esq.
Michele Marlene Mulrooney  Jackoway, Esq., and Children
Jon Jacobs
Russell James
JMAX Productions
Courtney Jurcak
Donald G. Kane
Zach Katz
Timothy Kaye
Lori Kennedy
Sarah Kershaw
Karen & Kevin Kiley
Beth and Frederick Klein
Jennifer Kluge
Heidi Krauel
Robert Krokower
Patrick Stephen Lamont or Phillip Stephen Lamont or P. Stephen Lamont
Lauren Lloyd Living Trust
LCD Soundsystem
Amanda Leavitt
Wayne Leavitt
Ted Leonsis
Blayne Lequeux
Less than Jake
Gerald R. Lewin  & Barbara S. Lewin
Jennifer P. Lewin
Anthony Lewinter, Esq.
Vinnie Liu
Kevin Lockwood
Paul Lypaczewski
Seamus Lyte
Ryan Magnussen
Susie Marino
Flip and Leanne McCrirrick
Lyle McCullough
McDonough Management
William McFarland
Doc McGee
Alan McKittrick
Merritt & Sophia Howard Fund
Hassan Miah
Milano Music Management
Paul E. Miller
Beverly Milligan
Matthew Mink
Sumair Mitroo
Charles Michael Moore
Misty Morgan
Alanis Morissette
Buddy Morra
Gina Moss
Ari & Yona Nadelman
Steve Nance-Poor
Gary Nathanson
New Media Holdings, Inc.
Carolyn Newman
Gary Nielsen
Rafeal "Hollywood" Niemtschik
Eric Nixon
Sherri Nixon
Mark Noyes
Jamie Ollivier
James  Osterling
Rose Palermo
Pay Up Management / Idolz Maker
Don Peake
Corri Perkiss
Gary  Pettus & Three Doors Down
Brad Arnold
Matt Roberts
Todd Harrell
Chris Henderson
Greg Upchurch
Louis Pfeffer
Matt Phillips
Daniel Preston
Tammy Raymond
Rebel Waltz
Joe  Reynolds
Shiny Toy Guns
Gregori Chad Petree
Jeremy Dawson
Mikey Martin
Sisely Treasure
Kevin Roach
Robert Roberman
Rock-It Cargo, USA Inc. Employee Pool
Jeff Roe
Caroline P. Rogers, Esq., and Geoffrey Rogers and Children
Spencer Rogers and Dana
Jude Rosario
Irving Rosen
Richard Rosman, Esq.
Harmony Rousseaux
Joseph Ryan
Sanctuary
Thomas Sanford
Jack Scanlan
Stephen Schleicher
Michael J. Seibert
Steven Selz, Esq.
Zakirul Shirajee
Rob Siefken
Silent Owners
Adam Simon
David Simon and Pamela Simon and Children
John Simon
Crystal and Lucas Simpson
Matthew Simpson
Steve Sklar
William Slaby and Michelle Morgan
Chris Smith
Shenell Smith
Special Team Music
Kim Staley
Bettie Stanger
Dana Stanger
Ginger Stanger
Jeffrey Stanger and Kimberly and Children
Lynn & Francis Stanger
Paul Stanger
Joan Stark
Steven Nevius
John Stillman
Michael Stomp and Nikki
Sherry Stomp
STP Employee Fund
Brian Street
John Stuart
Lou Supowitz
Steven Sutherland
Chris Terri
Gregory B. Thagard
The Pocket Recordings
Tidal 4
Tuvia School
Brian Utke and Karen
Jane Valence
Robert Veneer and Kari and Children
Stephen Verona
Jessica Verzaal
Villam Artists
Jeremey Wall
Bruce Warren
Debbie Washington
Scott Welch
Mitchell Welsch & Isa
Stew Westphal
Dorothy Winters
World Audience
Alan Young
Jeremy Yuricek
Mitch Zamarin

 


Free Article Submission Service

Nazi

Federalist

Federalism

Skull & Bones

Republican National Committee (RNC)

Bell Curve

Alberto Gonzales

National Security Letter (NSL)

Harry Moatz

Glenn Fine

Department of Justice

I. Scooter Libby

Scull & Bones

P. Stephen Lamont

Eliot I. Bernstein

Iviewit Holdings, Inc.

Iviewit Technologies, Inc.

Candice Bernstein

Cheney

Bush

Order of Death

it's only rock n' roll but i...

i got blisters on my fingers

Iviewit

Michael Grebe

Foley & Lardner

Alberto Gonzales

FBI OPR

Department of Justice Office of Inspector General

Patent

Patentgate

Inventor

Invention

Eliot Bernstein

Jude Rosario

Zakirul Shirajee

JEFFREY FRIEDSTEIN

GOLDMAN SACHS

MATTHEW MINK

H. Wayne Huizenga

H. Wayne Huizenga Jr.

INVESTECH Holdings LLC

Crossbow Ventures

Alpine Venture Capital partners LP

Donald G. Kane, II

MITCHELL WELSCH

WILLIAM DICK

DOUGLAS BOEHM

STEPHEN BECKER

GERALD R. LEWIN

GOLDSTEIN LEWIN & CO

ERIKA LEWIN

JENNIFER LEWIN;

RAYMOND ANTHONY JOAO

CARL TIEDEMANN

BRUCE PROLOW LLC

ROSS MILLER

RAYMOND HERSH

MICHAEL REALE

SCHIFFRIN & BARROWAY LLP

Atlas Entertainment

Tidal 4

Robert Shapiro

Alanis Morissette

Ellen DeGeneres

Anne Heche

Scott Welch

New Media Holdings, Inc.

Kenneth Anderson

James Osterling

Guy Iantoni

Jill M. Iantoni

Andrew Dietz

Donna B. Dietz

Patricia Daniels

Bettie Stanger

Lisa Friedstein

Joan Stark

Anthony Frenden

JASON GREGG

Anthony Giordano

Jack Scanlan

Misty Morgan

Maurice Buchsbaum

Emerald Capital Partners, Inc.

Armstrong Hirsch Jackoway Tyerman & Wertheimer, P.C.

David Colter

Kevin Lockwood

Alan Young

Ed Butler

Joe Ryan

David Bernstein

Kevin Roach

Barry Becker

Tony Chirino

Gregory B. Thagard

George DiBedart

Stephen Verona

Charles Brunelas

Courtney Jurcak

Tammy Raymond

Matthew Mink

Misty Morgan

Jennifer Kluge

Simon L. Bernstein

Caroline Prochotska Rogers

P. Stephen Lamont

Richard R. Rosman

Anthony Lewinter

Mollie Dekold;

Joseph Allen Fischman

Ginger Stanger

AMANDA STANGER

Crystal Stanger

Mitchell Zamarin;

LORNA GROTE

Joel Gonsalves

Marc Garber

Proskauer Rose

Christopher Wheeler

James Armstrong

Kenneth Rubenstein

Brian Utley

Raymond Joao

Foley & Lardner

Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolfe & Schlissel

Blakely Sokoloff Zafman & Taylor

Steven Krane

Chief Judge Judith Kaye

Matthew Triggs

Kelly Overstreet Johnson

The Florida Bar

New York State Bar Association

MPEG

MPEGLA

Video Streaming

Digital Video

Digital Imaging

United States Patent & Trademark Office

USPTO

Trademark

Copyright

Federal Bureau of Investigation

FBI

Crime

Theft

Intellectual Property

Stolen Patents

Supreme Court of the United States

Supreme Court of Florida

Supreme Court of New York

First Department Appellate Division

Second Department Appellate Division

Harry Moatz

Small Business Administration

SBA

Inspector General

Boca Raton Police Department

Car Bomb

Holy Grail

G-D

Iviewit

Iviewit Technologies

Iviewit Holdings

Iviewit Shareholder

I View It

Iviewit.com

Iviewit's

European Patent Office

EPO

Candice Bernstein

Joshua Ennio Zander Bernstein

Jacob Noah Archie Bernstein

Daniel Elijsha Abe Ottomo Bernstein

Lawyer

Streaming Video

Video

Digital Zoom

Digital Camera

Video Content Creation

Resolution

Scaled Video

Scaled Image

Scaling

DVD

HDDVD

CD ROM

Video Editing

Micro Chip

Chip

Video Software

Imaging Software

Video Camera

ZAPIT

Investigation

INTERPOL

International Crime

 

Evidence to Review 09 522 721 Filing with the United States Patent & Trademark Office claiming that per the direction of Harry I. Moatz, Director of the Office of Enrollment & Discipline, Iviewit & Crossbow Ventures were seeking the Commissioner of Patents to suspend the Iviewit patents based on evidence of Fraud on the United States Patent & Trademark Office by Iviewit former Intellectual Property attorneys, Kenneth Rubenstein, Proskauer Rose LLP, Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolf & Schlissel, Raymond Anthony Joao, Foley & Lardner, William J. Dick, Douglas Boehm, Steven Becker, Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman, Thomas Coester, Norman Zafman, Farzahd Ahmini, Christopher & Weisberg PA, Krishna Narine, Andrew Barroway, Schiffrin & Barroway and others. This led to the Commissioner of Patents suspending certain of the Iviewit patent applications into an infinite black hole. The form also included inventor change forms which have gone wholly unresolved while patents are in black hole at the United States Patent & Trademark Office.' March 10, 1900 to March 10, 2020. These are dates on fax headers on a patent filing with the United States Patent & Trademark Office on a Patent Application Oath & Declaration filed by Raymond Joao. This application is a fraud and the fax headers on the page are part of the explanation. Both fax machines' dates were changed to look like March 10, 2000 but instead come out as 3/10/1900 and 3/10/2020. This application also is entirely different than the application signed by the inventors. 1997 07 Kenneth Rubenstein of Proskauer Rose starts MPEGLA LLC patent pool while at Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolf and Schlissel. August 08 1997 MPEGLA - note they claim to have Department of Justice approval although the DOJ claims they have no such approval. 1998 12 29 IVIEWIT BIZ PLAN 1999 01 08 Christopher Wheeler of Proskauer Rose letter regarding delaying getting back to inventor Bernstein after receiving patent disclosures. 1999 01 15 Proskauer letter regarding Iviewit Corporation a company that disappears although bills are generated through it. 1999 01 15 Proskauer letter regarding Iviewit Corporation, a company that does not exist or perhaps it is another Proskauer owned entity involved in theft of the patents through a complex shell game with identically named and similarly named companies 1999 01 28 Letter from Iviewit to Albert Gortz of Proskauer Rose asking why Kenneth Rubenstein was not at Proskauer Rose as was told to Iviewit Shareholders and instead was found to be at Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolf & Schlissel. 1999 02 17 - Interactive Week article where Intel engineers are quoted as stating the Internet, at speeds under 1.5Mbps, would be text based with banners, no video or imaging of quality at the lower bandwidths. 1999 02 18 Christopher Wheeler letter regarding Proskauer and Kenneth Rubenstein review of patents. Rubenstein is patent expert reviewing the patents for patentability. 1999 02 18 Christopher Wheeler of Proskauer letter regarding Kenneth Rubenstein review of patents. 1999 02 22 Raymond Joao Patent Application before he says he knows Iviewit, Joao said he filed in March although it was supposed to be in January this application is missing from his bills and is in February. 1999 02 22 Raymond Joao patent application before he says he knows Iviewit, Joao bills for patent in March stating he is working on application. Yet, the filing card shows it was sent in 2/99. 1999 02 PATENT FILING RECEIPT - JOAO SAYS HE DOES NOT FILE ANYTHING UNTIL MARCH! 1999 03 02 Kenneth Rubenstein letter to inventor Bernstein regarding how to do patents. Rubenstein states in deposition that he does not know Bernstein, never spoke with him and that he knew nothing about the inventions. 1999 04 16 - Christopher Wheeler gets a CD with full screen video disclosure and in his deposition he states that at this time he was unaware of full screen video inventions. Note how Wheeler tries to constantly scramble attachments. 1999 04 16 Proskauer and Wheeler get info for full screen video invention. Wheeler in deposition states he did not know of video invention prior to Real3D meeting. This indicates he had seen the videos and retained cd's with the inventions on them. 1999 04 26 NDA - Goldman Sachs - Jeffrey Friedstein & Donald Kane. 1999 04 26 Proskauer opinion letter for Hassan Miah and Earthlink investors Sky Dayton and Kevin O'Donnell. Wheeler sends the opinion to Richard Rosman, Esq. = Contradictory evidence Wheeler states in deposition that Proskauer never reviewed the Iviewit patents and never made any opinions. The patent guy Miah refers to is Rubenstein. 1999 04 27 Rosman letter to Wheeler, Hassan wants to speak to Rubenstein, the Iviewit patent attorney. 1999 04 27 Rosman to Wheeler letter showing Hassan wants opinion of Proskauer's Rubenstein who he knows from MPEGLA, Wheeler sends a Proskauer opinion stating their retained counsel finds it to be novel and patentable. Wheeler lies under deposition and to Florida Bar stating he does not know anything about the technologies and never opined. 1999 04 27 Proskauer patent opinion. 1999 05 14 Real 3D deal. 1999 05 24 Real 3D meeting. 1999 05 30 Miah letter asking to email Iviewit patent counsel Rubenstein some questions. 1999 05 30 Miah Letter requesting to talk with Kenneth Rubenstein. 1999 06 01 Donald G. Kane, Iviewit Board member and member of Goldman Sachs, letter on structuring the companies. 1999 06 01 Hassan Miah letter forwarded to Rubenstein. 1999 06 03 Joao patent filing with the United States Patent & Trademark Office with a blanked out date. This document is later submitted to Japanese Patent Office and they reject the document. 1999 06 09 - Armstrong Hirsh Jackoway Tyerman & Wertheimer letter to Wheeler confirming Proskauer and Rubenstein patent opinion for Armstrong Hirsh investors. This wholly contradicts Wheeler and Rubenstein depositions that Proskauer did no patent work or opinions 1999 06 11 Wheeler hand notes regarding meeting with Intel, Silicon Graphics, Inc. and Lockheed Martin at Real 3D Inc. States disclosure of video and imaging inventions 1999 06 18 Proskauer bill for Iviewit Corporation, a company that does not exist, we think 1999 06 24 Lewin letter to Wheeler regarding his conflict of interests with Visual Data. Visual Data was an early violator of their NDA and when we found out we also found out that Lewin had undisclosed conflict. 1999 06 24 Lewin and Wheeler regarding conflict of interest with Proskauer and Goldstein Lewin client Visual Data. Wheeler failed to disclose they were a client of his and then after signing an NDA Visual Data begins using the Iviewit process without authorization. 1999 06 30 - Gerald Stanley CEO of Real 3D (Intel, SGI and Lockheed) opinion on the technologies. 1999 06 30 Real 3D Opinion and Licensing Info - We start to see evidence of companies we never heard of. Now there appears an Iviewit LLC and an Iviewit.com LLC. 1999 07 19 Armstrong Hirsh Jackoway Tyerman & Wertheimer letter to Wheeler at Proskauer asking why NDA's are in iviewit inc. a company they have no stock in or anyone else. 1999 07 23 Proskauer Opinion Letter to Huizenga Holdings via Cris Branden. Another opinion on the technologies this time for Wheeler's client Wayne Huizenga for investment. Huizenga invested $500,000 based on this opinion and Wheeler claims in deposition he did not know about the technologies and never opined. 1999 09 08 Proskauer letter by Wheeler to Lewin for payment of bills after Huizenga funding. Wheeler in deposition states payments were not based on funding, this letter appears to be a fraud. 1999 09 08 Proskauer Retainer almost one year after being retained, bogus document by Utley and Wheeler. 1999 09 20 Meeting with Kenneth Rubenstein, Raymond Joao, Brian Utley, Steven Filipek of Fish & Richardson PC. The meeting was in New York at Rubenstein's Office, yet Rubenstein denies even knowing us other than to refer Joao in his deposition. Filipek had questions regarding the patents he viewed, claiming they appeared to miss the invention. 1999 Not dated Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolf & Schlissel Patent Portfolio. 1999 Brian Utley resume given to Iviewit by Wheeler (his best friend) showing false statements about his past. He conceals former patent theft attempt from his past employer Diamond Turf Equipment, Inc. with Wheeler and William Dick and where Utley was fired with cause and the company was closed due to this attempted crime. Also, false claims of his academic career. 2.19.99 Proskauer Agreement with Jenex draft. 2000 03 09 Brian Utley writes letter to Raymond Joao, after Joao is thought to be writing patents wrong and possibly in his name. Decision is made to replace Joao with William Dick and Foley & Lardner LLP. Utley suddenly claims Joao patents have mistakes and major missing items. Good Guy - Bad Guy. Dick replaces Joao but instead of correcting Joao errors, wrong info and inventors, they further perpetuate the fraud. 2000 04 01 James Armstrong letter regarding Utley screwing up patents. 2000 04 11 Foley and Lardner - Invitation to Correct Defects patent filing. 2000 04 11 Foley and Lardner - Invitation to Correct Defects 2000 04 16 Iviewit letter to Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolf and Schlissel to transfer patent docs to Foley and Lardner. 2000 05 11 - Foley and Lardner letter stating there are problems with Joao's patents. All patents are not assigned to Iviewit Holdings per patent office. 2000 05 11 Wachovia Securities letter from Foley & Lardner regarding the Iviewit patents and is found later to be wholly wrong regarding assignments and other issues according to information from the United States Patent & Trademark Office. 2000 05 11 Wachovia Securities letter from Foley & Lardner stating false information regarding assignments and missing inventions. False statements for a Wachovia Private Placement by Foley and Lardner, a securities fraud. 2000 05 19 Armstrong Hirsh Jackoway & Tyerman investor letters further showing Rubenstein as Patent advisor now with Dick aiding and abetting him versus Joao. 2000 05 25 Dr Christopher Taylor Consulting Agreement 2000 05 25 Dr Christopher Taylor Consulting Agreement 2000 06 06 Foley & Lardner request Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolf and Schlissel and Joao files, claiming information is missing and not on file with the United States Patent & Trademark Office. 2000 06 06 Foley & Lardner requests Meltzer Lippe Goldstein & Schlissel files, stating that Joao has not transferred all patent applications and files, Joao does not send a US application and tries to replace it with a PCT. Once caught he sends file 5865-10 which he replaces patent signed by Eliot, Jude and Zakirul with his initial provisional filing. This is the application with fax dates of 1900 and 2020 stamped on them. 2004 06 09 Copy to Eliot Spitzer of Paul Curran's investigation of Thomas Cahill, Chief Counsel of the First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee, stemming from the conflicts of Cahill Rubenstein and Steven Krane and violations of public office. 2000 06 13 Foley & Lardner Patent Portfolio. 2000 06 22 PR News Ellen DeGeneres. "2000 06 23 iviewit.com unveils streaming video coverage of the ELLEN DEGENERES ‘Americana 2000’ Comedy Tour at SHOWBIZ EXPO. " 2000 07 07 Florida Sun Sentinel Article regarding Iviewit and Eliot Bernstein 2000 07 22 - Proskauer marketing letter to their clients regarding Iviewit technologies and Wheeler claims under deposition that he did not really know about the technology and thought Iviewit was a portal??? 2000 07 24 Foley & Lardner Patent Portfolio. 2000 07 24 Letter from Foley and Larder stating Joao patents are defective and are missing key info and disclosures. 2000 07 25 Dr Christopher Taylor Milwaukee Engineering Video study showing Iviewit invention for video plays better than true full-screen video, very cool. 2000 07 25 Dr Christopher Taylor Report Iviewit Scaling Video Tests. 2000 07 25 Foley and Lardner attempting to switch Patent Portfolio after Iviewit learned of Utley Patents that were written without company authorization. 2000 07 25 Foley & Lardner Patent Portfolio. 2000 07 31 Taped Meeting Foley & Lardner where they are asked questions about the patents discovered in Utley's name and why the patents are not assigned, etc. 2000 07 31 Transcript of Meeting with Foley and Lardner and Board Members regarding finding patents in wrong names and assignees. 2000 07 Iviewit MTV license draft. 2000 08 02 Taped Foley & Lardner meeting part 2. 2000 08 02 Taped Foley & Lardner meeting part 2. 2000 08 02 Taped Meeting Foley and Lardner Part 1 busted stealing patents. 2000 08 02 Taped Meeting Foley and Lardner Part 2 busted stealing patents. 2000 08 03 Letter From Foley & Lardner, Doug Boehm, stating he filed patents with 10 minutes to filing and made some mistakes. 2000 08 04 Letter From James F. Armstrong finding math errors on Foley & Lardner filed patent applications. 2000 08 04 Taped Meeting Foley & Lardner Part 1. 2000 08 04 Taped Meeting Foley & Lardner Part 1 busted stealing patents. 2000 08 09 James F. Armstrong, Foley & Lardner Douglas Boehm letter regarding Foley patent errors that were supposed to be filed corrected but still were filed wrong. This was beginning to discovery that something was afoul with Foley, we had no idea the extent at the time. 2000 08 09 Douglas Boehm of Foley & Lardner letter to Iviewit regarding his math errors and tries to diffuse the glowing malpractice claim and blame the problem on Eliot for Foley's errors. He is an engineer. 2000 08 09 Foley & Lardner trying to explain how math and other errors were filed in once corrected patent applications. 2000 08 09 James Armstrong letter to Foley & Lardner regarding the errors in the patent filings. 2000 08 25 Wheeler sends to Rubenstein PATENT PORTFOLIO BINDERS, contradicts Rubenstein's entire deposition, Wheeler delivers these documents to attorney Selz, after Rubenstein was already caught perjuring himself. 2000 08 25 Wheeler sending to Rubenstein PATENT BINDER wholly contradicts Rubenstein Wheeler and Utley Depositions, Rubenstein claims he never received or saw Iviewit Patents ~ OUCH. 2000 08 29 Wachovia Securities letter to Chairman of the Board regarding having done their Due Diligence, Foley & Lardner states Iviewit Holdings, Inc. is owner and assignee of all patents. Patent office information from OED Director Moatz contradicts this. Also in taped meetings held, Foley then admits that not all patents are assigned. Foley materially misrepresents to Wachovia the status of the patents and fails to list a missing Joao application = securities fraud. 2000 08 29 Wachovia Securities letter to Simon Bernstein, Board Member, regarding investment due diligence. 2000 09 01 NEWS ARTICLE - Grabbing the Holy Grail of Digital Webcasting - Digital Webcast. 2000 09 05 Real 3D / Intel / RYJO letter warning of using Iviewit technologies in violation of Real 3D / Intel NDA, RYJO tries to steal concepts and get intellectual property in his name, aided and abetted by Proskauer, Brian Utley and Michael Reale who thought RYJO and Ryan Huisman had not signed an NDA. Proskauer drafted a license whereby Iviewit would license its technology from RYJO. 2000 09 08 Shareholder James Armstrong writes letter requesting to know where the patents assignments are and why they were not filed based on the taped meetings with Foley & Lardner. 2000 09 08 James Armstrong letter to the Iviewit Board asking why the assignments on the patents were not filed. This would be shareholder fraud. 2000 09 09 Bernstein and Douglas Boehm letters regarding bad math filed and other issues. Foley & Lardner busted here. 2000 09 09 Bernstein, Foley & Lardner letters pertaining to errors in the patents filed. 2000 09 18 - 60 233 344 - Utley Zoom and Pan Camera patent filing with his name on them, this contradicts Utley's deposition that he knows nothing about a camera patent application in his name, oops. Fraud on the patent office, fraud on Iviewit, compounded with perjury. 2000 09 20 Raymond Hersh, Iviewit CFO, letter to Arthur Andersen stating Erika Lewin, CPA and in-house Iviewit accountant was miffed at being accused of misleading auditors. When reviewing the work, she seriously misstates information to auditors to keep their scam hidden. 2000 09 20 Raymond Hersh to Arthur Andersen, Erika Lewin accused of misleading auditors on corporate structure, it turns out to be entirely true. 2000 09 IVIEWIT, INC. of Delaware - Proskauer Rose has a confidentiality for this company but no company exists in Delaware with this name, how Proskauer. This may be one of the fraudulent entities that Proskauer was stealing the patents through. 2000 09 IVIEWIT, INC. DEL PROSKAUER HAS CONFIDENTIALITY 2000 10 09 ARTHUR ANDERSEN letter regarding Proskauer having to provide proof of Iviewit Holdings owning Iviewit Technologies, to auditors which they never produce, instead going on a straight away course to destroy Iviewit and the records. The audit was being conducted on behalf of Crossbow Ventures, whereby the Small Business Administration made up 2/3 of Crossbow Ventures loans. 2000 10 09 Arthur Andersen letter requesting proof that Iviewit Holdings, Inc. is owned by shareholders, turns out several Iviewit Holdings, Inc. exist, unraveling a corporate shell game where the other Iviewit Holdings, Inc. are owned by Proskauer and have stolen patents as their assets. 2000 11 27 ARTHUR ANDERSEN letters and termination letter of Iviewit as a client in the middle of an audit being conducted for the largest investor Crossbow Ventures in the middle of the audit where they found all kinds of problems. 2000 11 27 Arthur Andersen termination of audit letter, terminates Iviewit after almost one year of audit, after accusing Erika Lewin of fraud and finding problems with the companies. 2000 11 30 Foley & Lardner attempting to switch Patent Portfolio 2. 2000 11 30 Foley & Lardner attempting to switch Patent Portfolio 3. 2000 11 30 Foley & Lardner Patent Portfolio with Utley listed as an inventor, this is after Utley was busted with patents in his name and Foley tries to now include these patents we found. 2000 11 30 Foley & Lardner Patent Portfolio with 57103-122 being two different patents. Foley's dockets get crazy as they try to adjust once caught in the fraud. Suddenly, Utley shows up on multiple patents, replacing the original inventors and has two patents in his own name. All of this was never disclosed to shareholders, etc. 2000 11 30 Foley & Lardner Patent Portfolio with 57103-122 twice and different patents. 2000 11 30 Portfolio page from Foley & Lardner does not match up and is missing now the 120 filing. 2000 12 20 Letter to Utley asking why invention applications are missing from patents and to modify Patents to include all things missing. 2000 12 21 John D. Calkins, Senior Vice President New Media Business Development, Warner Bros. letter showing Utley sending Warner Bros. the Wachovia Private Placement Memorandum. 2000 12 NEWS RELEASE - Digital Webcast Article on Iviewit part2. 2000 Foley & Lardner Patent Portfolio Missing Dates - Utley busted and patents start showing up on fraudulent dockets. 2000 Iviewit income producing accounts for Encoding and Streaming licenses. 2000 Jorge Labarga's part in the Bush v. Gore presidential election fraud. There goes America. 2001 01 01 - Kenneth Rubenstein of Proskauer's biography in the Wachovia Securities Private Placement Memorandum and listed as Iviewit PATENT COUNSEL & BOARD DIRECTOR, this wholly contradicts Rubenstein, Wheeler & Utley depositions. 2001 01 01 Rubenstein listed in Wachovia Private Placement as patent counsel and board director, contradicts his entire deposition. 2001 01 01 Brian Utley fraudulent resume in the Wachovia Securities Private Placement Memorandum containing materially false and misleading claims about his former employment where he was caught stealing patents with none other than William J. Dick and Christopher Wheeler 2001 01 01 Wachovia Private Placement Memorandum - with bookmarks showing Rubenstein "Iviewit patent counsel" and retained intellectual property counsel 2001 01 01 Wachovia Private Placement Memorandum Bookmarked 2001 01 17 Utley lists Kenneth Rubenstein as patent counsel for an SBA Compliance Request for Crossbow SBIC Loans. This completely contradicts Utley Rubenstein and Wheeler deposition statements whereby they claim Rubenstein was never an Advisor, patent counsel and that he was not on Board. 2001 01 17 Utley lists Kenneth Rubenstein as Board Director for SBA loan compliance documents and to Crossbow Ventures, this is contradicted in his deposition when he claims he never used Rubenstein as an advisor and Rubenstein had NOTHING to do with Iviewit, oops. 2001 01 22 Kenneth Rubenstein named as patent attorney in Wachovia Private Placement Memorandum 2001 01 Kenneth Rubenstein biography in the Wachovia Securities PPM and also listed as Iviewit PATENT Counsel. 2001 01 Wachovia Private Placement Memorandum - with bookmarks in color. 2001 04 14 Brian Utley fingers Kenneth Rubenstein in the minutes of a Board Meeting calling him our advisor, this wholly contradicts his deposition statements whereby he claims Rubenstein was never an advisor. OOPS 2001 04 18 Brain Utley states in Board letter that Christopher Wheeler checked with Kenneth Rubenstein as an advisor to the Board, completely contradicting Utley Wheeler and Rubenstein depositions. 2001 04 18 Brian Utley writes letter to Board of Directors claiming that he checked with Rubenstein as an advisor to board. This contradicts Utley deposition statement that he never used Rubenstein as advisor, ouch. 2001 04 21 - James Armstrong letter regarding Brian Utley screwing up patents and company, right on the nose. 2001 05 04 Foley & Lardner letter to Brian Utley after he is fired, regarding the patents found in his name. This document is part of Foley & Lardner's attempt to try and make it look legitimate after being busted. 2001 05 08 - Board Meeting.doc 2001 06 07 Brian G. Utley police report full. 2001 06 07 Brian G. Utley police report, Embezzlement and Theft of Proprietary Systems 2001 06 12 - Book One NDA. 2001 06 12 - Book Three NDA. 2001 06 12 - Book Two NDA. 2001 06 12 - List of Confidentialities. 2001 06 25 - David J. Colter, Vice President Technology - Technological Operations Warner Bros. to Steve Case founder of AOLTW/WB regarding Eliot Bernstein and the Thought Journal. 2001 07 12 Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman portfolio shows Brian G. Utley patents, suddenly after Utley and Foley are caught with patents in wrong places, BSTZ is retained and Foley & Lardner sends patent portfolios that contain all kinds of new patents with all kinds of screw ups. 2001 07 12 Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman Patent Portfolio. 2001 07 13 Brian G. Utley police report embezzlement & theft leads to Utley returning stolen proprietary computers. Later discovered that computers were taken to New Jersey company owned partially by investor Tiedemann Prolow. Violates officer and director responsibilities and Utley's non-compete. 2001 07 17 Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman Patent status report. 2001 07 26 - Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman Power of Attorney Revocation 2. 2001 07 26 - Power of Attorney Revocation. 2001 08 01 Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman legal opinion and patent review revealing problems found. 2001 08 01 Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman patent evaluation, showing Utley had patents in his own name that were not assigned or owned by company, completely contradicting Utley deposition statements. This is a majordomo f'up. 2001 08 01 Iviewit investor presentation for AOL with Aidan Foley as CEO. 2001 08 04 Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman letter to Iviewit showing Utley on patents. 2001 08 04 Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman letter to Iviewit showing Brian G. Utley on patents. 2001 08 29 - Irell & Manella bill for AOL license agreement they drafted. 2001 09 17 Jeffrey Friedstein of Goldman Sachs, Power of Attorney for Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman. 2001 09 18 Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman requests Bernstein to sign a Power Of Attorney on behalf of Brian G. Utley, to remove him from applications he was found to be on. Evidence shows that patent filings were made with Utley in Japan by Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman after Utley was long gone, showing they continued the scam and played the good guy while furthering the crimes. 2001 12 10 Crossbow Ventures attempts to call loans. 2002 01 14 AOLTW / Warner Bros. letter stating they are using the Iviewit technologies in violation of their NDA!!! 2002 01 15 - AOLTW / Warner Bros. letter stating technologists checked with Kenneth Rubenstein who opined favorably on the Iviewit patents. This contradicts Rubenstein, Wheeler and Utley's statements under deposition and to the Florida Bar and the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department Disciplinary Committee. REMEMBER, RUBENSTEIN STATES HE KNOWS NOTHING AND PROSKAUER NEVER OPINED OR DID PATENT WORK. ooooops 2002 01 15 AOLTW / Warner Bros. investment due diligence letter stating that Rubenstein opined favorably on the patents. 2002 01 15 AOLTW RUBENSTEIN OPINION 2002 01 15 AOLTW RUBENSTEIN OPINION comments 2002 03 19 - Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman Japanese Patent Office filing for an Utley patent after he was fired over one year and they were supposed to be removing him from patents. Iviewit did not discover this until US Investigations led to research in Japan and this is when BSTZ was further found to be part of the conspiracy. This evidences that BSTZ portfolios had false and misleading information regarding these patents. 2002 03 28 Anthony Frenden statement regarding stolen investor money and proprietary equipment. Also shows that they tried to bribe employees with stolen cash. Funds are believed to be investor funds including monies of the Small Business Administration. 2002 04 22 Raymond A. Joao News Article claiming Joao has ninety, yes 90, patents in his name, this article needs to be checked for accuracy to see if it is a true publication on that date. 2002 04 22 Raymond Joao Article Stating Joao has 90 patents in his name and showing his stolen Airplane Video patent concept, stolen from Iviewit. 2002 04 23 William Kasser, Iviewit bookkeeper letter to Eliot Bernstein regarding Goldstein Lewin accounting fraud on financial projections. This represents more securities fraud and accounting fraud. 2002 04 23 Kasser to Eliot regarding Lewin fraud on financial documents submitted to lenders. 2002 06 09 Patent Portfolio Compilation showing the Greenberg Traurig patent findings in comparison to what Iviewit patent attorneys prior had stated on their dockets. 2002 06 09 Patent Portfolio2. 2002 06 11 Iviewit letter for Harry Moatz of the United States Patent & Trademark Office titled "System and Method for fraud on USPTO" and chock full of evidence. 2002 06 11 System and Method for Fraud on USPTO. 2002 06 11 USPTO complaint filed as patent System & Method for Fraud on the USPTO. 2002 06 17 Joao timeline of events and analysis of his documents and the frauds committed. 2002 08 22 Brian G. Utley deposition, states all patents are assigned to Iviewit and no patents are in his name. Contradictory evidence = patents in his name and all patents not assigned - confirmed by USPTO and leading to patent suspensions by commissioner. 2002 08 22 Brain G. Utley deposition states Kenneth Rubenstein is not an advisor, nor has he ever used him - Contradicted by Utley himself sending patent documents to Rubenstein and naming him as an advisor to the Board and other evidence. 2002 08 23 Brian G. Utley deposition that states William J. Dick was the attorney that wrote patents into Utley's name at his former employer Diamond Turf Equipment, Inc. which led to that business closing due to the thefts. Christopher Wheeler through Proskauer, set up the company where the Utley stolen patents were transferred. Wheeler lies to the Florida Bar and states he never did work for Brain Utley, then gets caught lying in his deposition. Writes apology for his perjury to the Florida Bar. All three of them failed to disclose the prior patent heist to anyone. 2002 08 23 Brian Utley deposition on Diamond Turf Equipment, Inc. and the patent dispute he had over the stolen intellectual properties with his former employer. 2002 08 23 Brian G. Utley deposition statement stating Christopher Wheeler knew about Diamond Turf Equipment, Inc. patent dispute. Wheeler while recommending Utley as President of Iviewit failed to disclose this little patent theft or that he was involved. William Dick never discloses his involvement when they bring him in to cover up Joao's crimes. The concealment and falsifying Utley's resume shows intent and that they were a prior criminal enterprise. Wheeler delivers Utley resume to the shareholders and completely fabricates Utley's past. 2002 08 23 Brian G. Utley deposition statement that William J. Dick never filed the patents for Diamond Turf Equipment but Dick, in his response the Virginia Bar, states he filed the patents in Utley's name to a company Christopher Wheeler at Proskauer had set up, Premiere Connection. The Virginia Bar despite being provided the evidence of such false statements fails to take action. 2002 08 23 Brain G. Utley deposition statement that he knew nothing about a Zoom and Pan Camera patent application. Contradictory evidence = Patent Application for Zoom and Pan on a Digital Camera filed in Utley's name without assignment to the company. 2002 08 23 Brian G. Utley deposition statement that there were patent disputes at Diamond Turf which he failed to put in his resume which led to his being fired by the owner Monte Friedkin and forcing the closure of Friedkin's company. Where Dick, Wheeler and Utley were all involved shows a criminal enterprise of patent thieves. 2002 08 23 Brian G. Utley deposition statement that Christopher Wheeler never represented him. Wheeler states that he did not ever represent Utley to the Florida Bar and then in deposition states that he formed a company for Utley. The reason they want to hide this corporate formation is that it is the company where the stolen patents from Diamond TE went 2002 08 23 Utley deposition states he did not graduate college, this contradicts his sworn statements in a Wachovia Private Placement that he said he did graduate college 2002 09 20 Greenberg Traurig Proposal Patents 2002 09 20 Greenberg Traurig Proposal Patents. 2002 10 16 Notice of Appeal on Jorge Labarga case. 2002 10 25 Kenneth Rubenstein sworn statement to Judge Jorge Labarga trying to get out of his deposition and claiming he does not know anything about Iviewit. 2002 10 25 Kenneth Rubenstein statement to Judge Jorge Labarga, complete false statements to avoid a deposition at his law firms lawsuit against Iviewit for a bill. 2002 11 20 Kenneth Rubenstein full deposition with Exhibits CERT. I KNOW NOTHING! 2002 11 20 Kenneth Rubenstein deposition regarding his being unsure a conflict check was done by Proskauer. This would have prevented MPEGLA from using the Iviewit processes disclosed to Rubenstein as Iviewit patent counsel, while he was a founder and patent counsel & reviewer for MPEGLA LLC 2002 11 20 Kenneth Rubenstein deposition statement that he does not have Iviewit patent documents = Contradictory evidence is a letter showing Christopher Wheeler sending him the entire Iviewit Patent Portfolio. 2002 11 21 Christopher Wheeler deposition stating he does not know about the video inventions = Contradictory evidence shows that Wheeler was sent video invention disclosures and then later in his deposition he claims to have been at video disclosure meeting with Intel and Real3D engineers. 2002 11 21 Christopher Wheeler deposition does not know about video invention. 2002 11 21 Christopher Wheeler deposition regarding no conflicts check, neither him or Kenneth Rubenstein are sure a conflicts check was ever done. 2002 11 21 Christopher Wheeler deposition statement that Iviewit was a portal, he didn't know about the technologies and that Proskauer was hired for portal services and not to patent the inventions. Contradictory evidence is overwhelming. 2002 11 21 Wheeler deposition statement that no Proskauer conflict of interest check was done. 2002 11 21 Wheeler deposition statement that Proskauer and Christopher Wheeler represented Brian G. Utley in the past. They failed to disclose that this former work by Proskauer and Wheeler was for a company where stolen patents went at Utley's former employer. Contradictory evidence = Wheeler's statements under deposition and to the Florida Bar that conflict, constituting perjury. Also, Utley states in deposition that Wheeler never did work for him. "Who's on first." 2002 11 21 Christopher Wheeler deposition stating Proskauer never opined on the technologies or had anything to do with patents. Contradictory evidence = Wheeler/Proskauer patent opinions for the investors. Wachovia Private Placement showing Wheeler and Rubenstein on the Board of Directors and claiming Kenneth Rubenstein and Proskauer are retained patent counsel. 2003 01 11 Palm Beach Post Article stating Crossbow Ventures sold an Iviewit company! Problem -- Crossbow Ventures do not own the company to sell and failed to tell investors about it = securities fraud. Evidence shows that SBA loans were written down and then the securities were sold = fraud on the SBA. 2003 01 11 Palm Beach Post Article Crossbow Sells Iviewit. 2003 01 11 Palm Beach Post Article Crossbow Sells Iviewit2 2003 01 11 Palm Beach Post Article Crossbow Sells Iviewit2. 2003 01 28 Proskauer v. Iviewit, Judge Jorge Labarga, Counter Complaint was filed but Labarga refused it claiming attorneys that were initially found representing Iviewit with no authority basically waived any rights to such. It was not learned until much later that the suit involved fraudulent companies set up by Proskauer with stolen intellectual properties in them and that the suit was part of a scheme with a fraudulent federal bankruptcy filing, to seize the patents in a shell game. 2003 01 31 Eliot Bernstein deposition, this document is well worth the read as Eliot Bernstein deposes the deposition takers from Proskauer, note, Proskauer is continuously representing themselves in all lawsuits and all bar complaints. 2003 02 25 Raymond Joao 9th district original attorney misconduct complaint - somehow gets transferred to the wrong district, the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee for prosecution with the Proskauer attorney misconduct complaints, although Joao is registered elsewhere. 2003 02 26 Original attorney misconduct complaint against Proskauer and Kenneth Rubenstein filed at the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee. 2003 02 26 Original Rubenstein Bar Action 2003 02 26 Original Florida Bar Complaint against Proskauer and Christopher Wheeler. 2003 03 20 Judge Jorge Labarga Court Order for Kenneth Rubenstein and Christopher Wheeler to return to take further deposition to answer previously unanswered questions that they tried to refuse to come back too after being caught lying and perjuring themselves in the first part. The trial is thrown before they can be deposed again. 2003 04 07 - Christopher Wheeler perjured statement to the Florida Bar regarding Brian G. Utley. Wheeler in a footnote in a response tries to minimize the extent of the lie he is caught in. 2003 04 07 - Christopher Wheeler perjured Florida Bar statement. Florida Bar while cognizant of the crime of perjury in an official proceeding fails to take any action, although Wheeler is caught beyond a reasonable doubt and apologizes for his lies in writing. Oh yeah, the President of the Florida Bar turns out to be Wheeler's brother, James Wheeler, underling at the law firm of Broad and Cassel and fails to disclose such while receiving documents from Iviewit to investigate. 2003 04 07 - Christopher Wheeler and Proskauer's response to the bar complaint which is tendered by Matthew Triggs of Proskauer who acted in violation of his public office with the Florida Supreme Court agency The Florida Bar. 2003 04 07 - Christopher Wheeler and Proskauer's response to The Florida Bar bar complaint which was tendered by Matthew Triggs of Proskauer who acted in conflict of interest and violation of public office with his Supreme Court of Florida Bar Position. 2003 04 08 Raymond Joao's response to the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee. Joao actually tries to accuse Iviewit of stealing his inventions. Coocoo. 2003 04 08 Raymond Joao's response to the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee. Joao actually tries to accuse Iviewit of stealing his inventions. Coocoo. 2003 04 11 - Kenneth Rubenstein and Proskauer's response to the bar complaint filed at the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee authored by Proskauer Rose attorney Steven C. Krane, who acted in conflict of interest and violation of public offices with the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee and also in violation of his role as former President of the NY Bar Association precluding him from handling any bar complaints within a one year blackout and where he had personal and professional interests he also violated his ethics. This sucks for like the guy who parades around as being an ethics leader, saddest day in the life of Socrates, rollin' in his grave. 2003 04 11 - Kenneth Rubenstein response authored by Proskauer attorney Steven C. Krane. Krane was former New York State Bar Association President and former law clerk to New York Supreme Court Appellate Division, Krane was clerk for Chief Judge of New York, Judith Kaye who is also in conflict and abuse of public office as Kaye is married to a Porksour partner, who recently died, Stephen R. Kaye and Judith failed to take any actions when notified of the crimes in the courts she oversees!!!!! 2003 04 16 Supreme Court of New York First Department Disciplinary Committee regarding reply to Raymond Joao complaint. 2003 04 30 Eliot Bernstein / Iviewit response to Christopher Wheeler Florida Bar Complaint BOOKMARKED. Wheeler's response it is later learned was tendered by his partner Matthew Triggs who was prohibited from representing any bar complaints due to his official position with the Florida Bar' 2003 04 30 Eliot Bernstein / Iviewit response to Christopher Wheeler Florida Bar Complaint BOOKMARKED. Wheeler's response it is later learned was tendered by his partner Matthew Triggs who was prohibited from representing any bar complaints due to his official position with the Florida Bar. BOOKMARKED 2003 04 30 P. Stephen Lamont Rebuttal to Christopher Wheeler's response to the Florida Bar complaint filed against him. BOOKMARKED 2003 05 05 Florida Bar Receipt Filing 2003 05 06 Proskauer Florida Bar Receipt Filing 2003 05 23 Christopher Wheeler Admits Perjury and False Statements made to The Florida Bar in his response. Of course Triggs, acting in conflict and violation of public office makes the perjurious statement a footnote. 2003 05 23 Christopher Wheeler Admits Perjury and False Statements made to The Florida Bar in his response. Of course Triggs, acting in conflict and violation of public office makes the perjurious statement a footnote. 2003 05 23 Christopher Wheeler Response to Florida Bar Rebuttal 2, tendered by Matthew Triggs who acted in violation of his Florida Supreme Court Bar position in representing Wheeler. 2003 05 23 Wheeler Response to Rebuttal Partial 2003 05 26 Iviewit Rebuttal to Raymond Joao attorney misconduct complaint. 1753 Pages BOOKMARKED 2003 06 03 Iviewit Rebuttal to Wheeler 2nd Response to the Florida Bar complaint filed against him. BOOKMARKED 2003 06 03 Iviewit Rebuttal to Wheeler Florida Bar Complaint 2nd Response Final 2003 06 04 Lorraine Christine Hoffman of The Florida Bar cover letter regarding Wheeler bar complaint. 2003 06 13 Kenneth Rubenstein affidavit to his deposition, where he writes in his answers without precedence, rhythm or reason. Judge Jorge Labarga orders Rubenstein to return to deposition and answer the questions he refused the first time after walking out of his deposition. Remember this is his deposition in his firms law suit. 2003 07 01 Florida Bar Response Wheeler Complaint trying to claim that the federal state and international crimes presented them were more a civil matter. 2003 07 02 Iviewit Rebuttal to Kenneth Rubenstein's response to the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee. Final 2200+ Pages ALL 2003 07 04 Mitchell Welsch Letter of Understanding for Schiffrin and Barroway deal that went awry. 2003 07 16 Signed Letter of Understanding "LOU" between Iviewit & Schiffrin & Barroway for two million dollars and full funding of all legal counsel in all legal actions. One must ask where are they and the story can be found in complaints filed at the Pennsylvania State Bar. 2003 07 18 - Krishna Narine from Schiffrin & Barroway taking over patents and getting his family member Weisberg of Christopher & Weisberg, PA involved. 2003 07 18 - Krishna Narine from Schiffrin & Barroway taking over patents and getting his family member Weisberg of Christopher & Weisberg PA involved. 2003 07 22 - Krishna Narine of Schiffrin & Barroway transfers patents to Christopher & Weisberg. 2003 07 22 - Overnight and billing for transfer of patents to Christopher & Weisberg. 2003 07 22 Bernstein confirms patent transfer to Weisberg. 2003 07 24 Crossbow Ventures and DiStream Interactive deal. 2003 07 24 DiStream Interactive draft term sheet with Iviewit Inc. and Iviewit Holdings never executed as it was a bad deal and it was found that DiStream CEO Royal O'Brien had rewritten Iviewit patents into his name. 2003 07 25 Steven M. Selz of Selz & Muvdi letter regarding stand down orders in Labarga litigation because Schiffrin and Barroway operating under the signed LOU asked to replace him in the case. 2003 07 25 Steven M. Selz letter to Schiffrin & Barroway regarding stand down as counsel orders. 2003 07 28 Proskauer draft settlement that had so many flaws no one could sign it without repercussions of committing fraud against the Shareholders and they would not put in clause regarding the patents, that stated if the patents were damaged it was their liability. 2003 08 01 Judge Jorge Labarga grants Schiffrin & Barroway motion to withdraw as counsel, in a surprise move at a rehearing scheduling days after the original trial was cancelled by Labarga with no notice to Steven Selz, Iviewit's counsel or Iviewit. This leaves Iviewit with no counsel on the eve trial, two law firms dismissed by Labarga whereby both said the other would be representing Iviewit. 2003 08 01 Judge Jorge Labarga grants Steven M. Selz motion to withdraw as counsel for the upcoming trial after Selz states Schiffrin & Barroway who signed a binding Letter of Understanding would be handling the case. Then Schiffrin & Barroway submits a surprise motion to withdraw and Labarga grants it, leaving Iviewit with no counsel. 2003 08 01 Judge Jorge Labarga regarding Steven M. Selz's notice to withdraw and trial rescheduling. 2003 08 01 Schiffrin & Barroway notice to withdraw as counsel from Iviewit, breaching their binding LOU and legal retainer. 2003 08 01 Steven M. Selz withdrawal as counsel in Proskauer v. Iviewit. 2003 08 02 - Iviewit letter to Krishna Narine of Schiffrin & Barroway on Christopher & Weisberg PA failure to file response on patent after taking Iviewit as a client. 2003 08 02 - Iviewit letter to Christopher & Weisberg regarding their being retained by Schiffrin & Barroway, getting the patents transferred by Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman and then blowing off a patent filing in violation of Title 35 USC and the Federal Patent bar, for this they were added to the complaints with Harry I. Moatz, Director of the United States Patent & Trademark Office - Office of Enrollment & Discipline. 2003 08 04 Christopher & Weisberg withdrawal as counsel and attempts to claim they were not acting as counsel for Iviewit which is wholly untrue as they were retained by a family relative from Schiffrin & Barroway, Krishna Narine. This seriously jeopardizes Iviewit with USPTO on patent filings. 2003 08 05 - Iviewit response to Christopher & Weisberg email stating they had missed a patent filing while being retained counsel. 2003 08 08 Federal Bureau of Investigation West Palm Beach Florida, original complaint filing with Glenda Moffat. 2003 08 12 Andrew Barroway of Schiffrin & Barroway Pennsylvania Bar complaint. 2003 08 13 Iviewit demand letter to Schiffrin & Barroway for performance under signed and binding LOU. 2003 08 13 Schiffrin & Barroway demand for performance letter. 2003 08 14 Christopher Wheeler involvement at Florida Atlantic University Foundation Scandal & Fuzion Fraud. Utley and Wheeler controlled FAU foundation when scandal took place. Wheeler was reported taking tax deduction on his portion of contribution to a Corvette for past president. 2003 08 28 Boca Raton Police Written Statement regarding stolen cash from Iviewit including funds from Tiedemann Prolow investment, Crossbow Ventures investments which were 2/3 Small Business Administration loans. 2003 09 02 - Boca Raton Police Department Written Statement regarding stolen intellectual property given to Detective Robert Flechaus who failed to perform his investigative duties and buried the complaints instead. 2003 09 02 Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee letter that was lost for months regarding holding off investigation of Kenneth Rubenstein, Proskauer Rose, Raymond Joao and Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolf & Schlissel. 2003 09 02 Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee response regarding Raymond Joao, Proskauer Rose, Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolf & Schlissel and Kenneth Rubenstein bar complaints which comes way late as it was lost in the mail. The document is probably fraudulent and tries to dismiss the complaints as a civil matter, although they ignore the state, federal and international crimes against the government and foreign nations exposed in the complaints. 2003 09 17 United States Patent & Trademark Office - Office of Enrollment & Discipline written statement to Harry I Moatz, Director of the OED. 2003 09 19 Motion for mistrial in the Proskauer v. Iviewit case based on the insane actions of Judge Jorge Labarga. 2003 09 23 United States Patent & Trademark Office - Office of Enrollment & Discipline written statement to Harry I Moatz, Director of the OED. Corrected. 2003 09 23 Virginia Bar Complaint filed against William J. Dick and Foley & Lardner for Dick's patent crimes. 2003 09 25 Certified letter to Harry I. Moatz and William Dick. 2003 09 26 - Iviewit letter to The Florida Bar, that civil case was over which is why the failed to investigate originally, although Florida Bar rules prohibit delaying investigation into bar complaints because of civil cases. 2003 09 02 Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee letter that was lost for months regarding holding off investigation of Kenneth Rubenstein, Proskauer Rose, Raymond Joao and Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolf & Schlissel. 2003 10 02 - Letter to Florida Bar - Missing 2003 10 02 - Letter to Florida Bar - Not Signed Missing Exhibits 2003 10 02 Iviewit letter to The Florida Bar to re-file the complaint against Christopher Clark Wheeler as the civil litigation was completed. 2003 10 02 Iviewit letter to The Florida Bar to re-file the complaint against Christopher Clark Wheeler as the civil litigation was completed. 2003 10 08 Virginia Bar response to William J. Dick and Foley & Lardner bar complaint requesting more information. 2003 10 08 Virginia Bar response to William J. Dick and Foley & Lardner bar complaint requesting more information. 2003 10 13 - Florida Bar letter by Lorraine Christine Hoffman attempting to delay Christopher Wheeler bar complaint investigation still claiming it was before a civil court. Hoffman knew that Judge Labarga had limited the Proskauer v. Iviewit case to strictly billing issues and denied a counter complaint that tried to bring in the patent crimes and other crimes committed. Hoffman ignores these facts and continues to protect Wheeler, at the time it was unknown that the President of The Florida Bar, Kelly Overstreet Johnson worked for Wheeler's brother James Wheeler at Broad & Cassel a Florida law firm. Johnson conceals the conflict while accepting information on the Wheeler complaint. 2003 10 13 The Florida Bar letter again delaying wheeler complaint based on civil litigation. 2003 10 15 Judicial Qualifications Commission of Florida complaint against Judge Jorge Labarga letter from Kennerly. 2003 10 30 Department of Justice complaint filed against Rubenstein and others for antitrust violations including their MPEGLA patent pooling scheme and claims that the DOJ approved the scheme. 2003 10 30 Department of Justice complaint filed against Rubenstein and others for antitrust violations including their MPEGLA patent pooling scheme and claims that the DOJ approved the scheme. 2003 10 30 Fax receipt for William J. Dick Virginia bar complaint response. 2003 11 09 AICPA Goldstein Lewin & Co. complaint against Erika & Gerald Lewin. 2003 11 10 - The Florida Bar letter response refusing to start investigation of Christopher Clark Wheeler of Proskauer and his bar complaint. 2003 11 10 - The Florida Bar letter response refusing to start investigation of Christopher Clark Wheeler of Proskauer and his bar complaint. 2003 11 14 P. Stephen Lamont letter to Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman asking where the intellectual property docket is. 2003 11 14 P. Stephen Lamont letter to Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman asking where the intellectual property docket is. 2003 11 17 - Final Judgment against Iviewit in the Proskauer v. Iviewit case. Judgment was issued by Judge Jorge Labarga, after he cancelled the first trial with no notice to Iviewit or either of their law firms, Selz & Muvdi and Schiffrin & Barroway. At the rescheduling hearing both Schiffrin & Barroway and Selz Muvdi withdrew as counsel stating the other would be handling the case. Labarga let both go instead, despite the fact that Schiffrin & Barroway had signed a binding LOU/Legal Retainer agreement to represent Iviewit at the case. This forced Iviewit to have no counsel and days later Labarga ruled a default on Iviewit for failure to retain replacement counsel. Iviewit could not find counsel that fast in a almost three year case and Schiffrin and Selz refused to turn over necessary files needed to find new counsel or file an appeal. 2003 11 17 - Final Judgment against Iviewit in the Proskauer v. Iviewit case. Judgment was issued by Judge Jorge Labarga, after he cancelled the first trial with no notice to Iviewit or either of their law firms, Selz & Muvdi and Schiffrin & Barroway. At the rescheduling hearing both Schiffrin & Barroway and Selz Muvdi withdrew as counsel stating the other would be handling the case. Labarga let both go instead, despite the fact that Schiffrin & Barroway had signed a binding LOU/Legal Retainer agreement to represent Iviewit at the case. This forced Iviewit to have no counsel and days later Labarga ruled a default on Iviewit for failure to retain replacement counsel. Iviewit could not find counsel that fast in a almost three year case and Schiffrin and Selz refused to turn over necessary files needed to find new counsel or file an appeal. 2003 11 19 - Iviewit letter to Eric Turner of The Florida Bar requesting a review of the Lorraine Christine Hoffman determination. 2003 11 19 - Iviewit letter to Eric Turner of The Florida Bar requesting a review of the Lorraine Christine Hoffman determination. 2003 11 20 - Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman Intellectual Property portfolio showing Japanese Patents and Utley Patents. 2003 11 20 - The Florida Bar re-examination notice stating they were reviewing the prior decision regarding the Christopher Wheeler bar complaint. 2003 11 20 - The Florida Bar re-examination notice stating they were reviewing the prior decision regarding the Christopher Wheeler bar complaint. 2003 11 22 - European Patent Office response to formal office action which exposes the fraud that Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman was supposed to be exposing to them and correcting but never did. This document turns up later to be sent by Chris Mercer of the Institute of Professional Representatives before the European Patent Office who while investigating the EPO filings but the document has been tampered with and is missing the exhibits, etc. 2003 11 23 - P010 European Patent Office response to office action filed by Martyn Molyneaux of WILDMAN, HARROLD, ALLEN & DIXON LLP whereby Molyneaux confirms that he filed the fraud charges but instead it appears he filed a fraudulent document without most of the exhibits. 2003 11 23 - P010 European Patent Office response to office action filed by Martyn Molyneaux of WILDMAN, HARROLD, ALLEN & DIXON LLP whereby Molyneaux confirms that he filed the fraud charges but instead it appears he filed a fraudulent document without most of the exhibits. 2003 11 24 Patent Portfolio of Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman. 2003 11 25 Response to Pennsylvania Bar regarding complaints against Schiffrin & Barroway. 2003 12 11 Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman writes a letter regarding the missing patent files sent by Foley & Lardner. 2003 12 11 Iviewit letter to Florida Judicial Qualification Commission, Brooke Kennerly response Final EIB PSL signed. 2003 Letter from Iviewit to Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman regarding the patent matters. 2003 10 30 Iviewit response to Virginia Bar letter regarding the bar complaint filed against William J. Dick and Foley & Lardner. 2004 01 06 Brian G. Utley declaration for William Dick's Virginia Bar response. This statement is contradicted by Utley's statements in his own deposition regarding the filing by Dick of stolen patent from Utley's former employer Diamond Turf Equipment, Inc. It is later learned that Christopher Wheeler had set up a company, Premiere Connections, for Utley to house the patents Dick was stealing with Utley from Utley's employer Monte Friedkin. This again shows a criminal enterprise with a prior history of patent crimes. 2004 01 08 - William J. Dick statement to Virginia Bar showing his involvement with Brian G. Utley at Diamond Turf Equipment, Inc. and claims that he filed patents with the United States Patent & Trademark Office which contradicts Utley deposition statements that patents were never filed. Although these fraudulent statements are exposed to the Virginia Bar they fail to do anything to question Dick regarding these crimes, including falsifying information to the Virginia Bar. 2004 01 08 - Foley & Lardner patent portfolio included as part of William J. Dick's Virginia Bar complaint. This IP docket was later submitted to Harry I Moatz of the United States Patent & Trademark Office whereby Moatz found many inconsistencies with the IP docket versus what was one file. This leads Moatz to get patents suspended by the Commissioner of Patents. Although the Virginia Bar was notified of Moatz's actions and the fraudulent IP docket they failed to investigate the matters. 2004 01 08 William J. Dick's statement to the Virginia Bar showing that Premiere Connections received patents Dick wrote into Utley's name and sent to his home, inventions of Utley's employer, Premiere Connections turns out to be the company that Christopher Wheeler of Proskauer Rose set up for Brian G. Utley. Wheeler later lies and perjures himself by saying he never did work for Utley to conceal this company from the Florida Bar action. Wheeler lies to the Florida Bar that he never did work for Utley and then contradicts himself in deposition, after Utley also contradicts Wheeler's lies. This ties Utley, Wheeler and Dick together in former theft of patents from Utley's prior employer of which all three fail to disclose this matter to the Iviewit Shareholders or Board. 2004 01 09 - Response to Thomas J. Cahill, Chief Counsel, New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee regarding the attorney misconduct complaint against Proskauer Rose, Kenneth Rubenstein, Raymond Joao and Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolf & Schlissel being delayed due to a lost letter he supposedly had sent. This is right before Iviewit learns that the attorney for Proskauer is a Proskauer partner, in the IP department no less, who just happens to be a member of the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee. 2004 01 09 - Response to Thomas J. Cahill, Chief Counsel, New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee regarding the attorney misconduct complaint against Proskauer Rose, Kenneth Rubenstein, Raymond Joao and Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolf & Schlissel being delayed due to a lost letter he supposedly had sent. This is right before Iviewit learns that the attorney for Proskauer is a Proskauer partner, in the IP department no less, who just happens to be a member of the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee. 2004 01 09 Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman letter response to Thomas Coester, charging Blakely with crimes and being a conspirator. 2004 01 09 Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman letter response to Thomas Coester, charging Blakely with crimes and being a conspirator. 2004 01 09 Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman letter response to Thomas Coester, charging Blakely with crimes and being a conspirator. 2004 01 13 Department of Justice Antitrust Division Response to Iviewit complaint. Iviewit does not respond to this as investigations begin at the United States Patent & Trademark Office. What is most interesting to note is that the DOJ claims that it never approved the MPEGLA LLC licensing scheme that it only issued a business review letter. This makes MPEGLA LLC claim that the DOJ gave them approval false and misleading and allows them to sell to the public they have DOJ approval for this patent pooling scheme. What is more interesting is that the DOJ had prior consistently broke up patent pools for violations of antitrust laws. 2004 01 13 Department of Justice Antitrust Division Response to Iviewit complaint. Iviewit does not respond to this as investigations begin at the United States Patent & Trademark Office. What is most interesting to note is that the DOJ claims that it never approved the MPEGLA LLC licensing scheme that it only issued a business review letter. This makes MPEGLA LLC claim that the DOJ gave them approval false and misleading and allows them to sell to the public they have DOJ approval for this patent pooling scheme. What is more interesting is that the DOJ had prior consistently broke up patent pools for violations of antitrust laws. 2004 01 20 Eric Montel Turner from The Florida Bar response to not investigate Christopher Clark Wheeler and Turner opines that Proskauer did no patent work for Iviewit having not formally investigated the Wheeler complaint, this is a violation of the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar which precludes Florida Bar from siding with either parties claims without formal investigation. A bar complaint is filed against Turner for this but the Florida Bar dismisses it without formally docketing or disposing of it, claiming it was an employer/employee matter. Even that should have been formally docketed and disposed of but it was not. 2004 01 20 Eric Montel Turner from The Florida Bar response to not investigate Christopher Clark Wheeler and Turner opines that Proskauer did no patent work for Iviewit having not formally investigated the Wheeler complaint, this is a violation of the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar which precludes Florida Bar from siding with either parties claims without formal investigation. A bar complaint is filed against Turner for this but the Florida Bar dismisses it without formally docketing or disposing of it, claiming it was an employer/employee matter. Even that should have been formally docketed and disposed of but it was not. 2004 01 21 - William J. Dick of Foley & Lardner's Virginia Bar response whereby Dick claims he filed patents for Brian G. Utley contradicting Utley's deposition statement stating patents were never filed for inventions of his former employer. 2004 01 21 - William J. Dick and Foley & Lardner response to his Virginia Bar complaint. Full of lies. 2004 01 25 Iviewit response to Eric Montel Turner of The Florida Bar regarding the failure of the Florida Bar to reopen the Wheeler Complaint and to retract and redact statements regarding Proskauer not having done patent work for Iviewit which is patently false. 2004 01 25 Iviewit response to Eric Montel Turner of The Florida Bar regarding the failure of the Florida Bar to reopen the Wheeler Complaint and to retract and redact statements regarding Proskauer not having done patent work for Iviewit which is patently false. "2004 01 27 WILDMAN, HARROLD, ALLEN & DIXON LLP letter stating that Martyn Molyneaux left the firm." "2004 01 27 WILDMAN, HARROLD, ALLEN & DIXON LLP letter stating that Martyn Molyneaux left the firm." 2004 01 28 Iviewit response to Eric Montel Turner of The Florida Bar regarding his decision not to reopen the Christopher Clark Wheeler case despite massive evidence against Wheeler. 2004 02 02 Eric Montel Turner of the Florida Bar response to Iviewit regarding his stating that he was the final arbiter of Florida Bar complaints and stating that it would be passed to the next highest level of review which he had stated did not exist, trying to get Iviewit to give up and not press the claims with the Florida Bar. 2004 02 04 - Iviewit response to Eric Montel Turner response to the Iviewit 2004 02 02 letter. 2004 02 04 - Iviewit response to Eric Montel Turner response to the Iviewit 2004 02 02 letter. 2004 02 11 - 09 587 026 Filing with the United States Patent & Trademark Office claiming that per the direction of Harry I. Moatz, Director of the Office of Enrollment & Discipline, Iviewit & Crossbow Ventures were seeking the Commissioner of Patents to suspend the Iviewit patents based on evidence of Fraud on the United States Patent & Trademark Office by Iviewit former Intellectual Property attorneys, Kenneth Rubenstein, Proskauer Rose LLP, Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolf & Schlissel, Raymond Anthony Joao, Foley & Lardner, William J. Dick, Douglas Boehm, Steven Becker, Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman, Thomas Coester, Norman Zafman, Farzahd Ahmini, Christopher & Weisberg PA, Krishna Narine, Andrew Barroway, Schiffrin & Barroway and others. This led to the Commissioner of Patents suspending certain of the Iviewit patent applications into an infinite black hole. The form also included inventor change forms which have gone wholly unresolved while patents are in black hole at the United States Patent & Trademark Office.' 2004 02 14 Eric M. Turner of the Florida Bar 3rd response regarding the Christopher Clark Wheeler and Proskauer Rose LLP complaint. Turner states that when he told us he was the final arbiter and there was no higher level, which was learned to be false, that he meant the Florida Bar was the highest level and that the Florida Supreme Court would not hear the matter. This statement is false as the Florida Supreme Court did hear the matter and then declined to hear it??? 2004 03 02 - Iviewit letter to Stephen Warner of Crossbow Ventures regarding the patent problems and fraud that was going on at Iviewit. 2004 03 03 - 09 522 721 Filing with the United States Patent & Trademark Office claiming that per the direction of Harry I. Moatz, Director of the Office of Enrollment & Discipline, Iviewit & Crossbow Ventures were seeking the Commissioner of Patents to suspend the Iviewit patents based on evidence of Fraud on the United States Patent & Trademark Office by Iviewit former Intellectual Property attorneys, Kenneth Rubenstein, Proskauer Rose LLP, Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolf & Schlissel, Raymond Anthony Joao, Foley & Lardner, William J. Dick, Douglas Boehm, Steven Becker, Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman, Thomas Coester, Norman Zafman, Farzahd Ahmini, Christopher & Weisberg PA, Krishna Narine, Andrew Barroway, Schiffrin & Barroway and others. This led to the Commissioner of Patents suspending certain of the Iviewit patent applications into an infinite black hole. The form also included inventor change forms which have gone wholly unresolved while patents are in black hole at the United States Patent & Trademark Office. 2004 03 03 Crossbow Ventures CEO Stephen J. Warner signs statement to patent office that fraud was committed by the attorneys against Iviewit and Crossbow Ventures and where 2/3 of the Crossbow Venture funds were Small Business Administration SBIC loans, this makes this fraud against the SBA and the USPTO. Oy Vey. 2004 03 04 - 09 522 721 Filing with the United States Patent & Trademark Office claiming that per the direction of Harry I. Moatz, Director of the Office of Enrollment & Discipline, Iviewit & Crossbow Ventures were seeking the Commissioner of Patents to suspend the Iviewit patents based on evidence of Fraud on the United States Patent & Trademark Office by Iviewit former Intellectual Property attorneys, Kenneth Rubenstein, Proskauer Rose LLP, Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolf & Schlissel, Raymond Anthony Joao, Foley & Lardner, William J. Dick, Douglas Boehm, Steven Becker, Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman, Thomas Coester, Norman Zafman, Farzahd Ahmini, Christopher & Weisberg PA, Krishna Narine, Andrew Barroway, Schiffrin & Barroway and others. This led to the Commissioner of Patents suspending certain of the Iviewit patent applications into an infinite black hole. The form also included inventor change forms which have gone wholly unresolved while patents are in black hole at the United States Patent & Trademark Office. 2004 03 04 - 09 587 026 Filing with the United States Patent & Trademark Office claiming that per the direction of Harry I. Moatz, Director of the Office of Enrollment & Discipline, Iviewit & Crossbow Ventures were seeking the Commissioner of Patents to suspend the Iviewit patents based on evidence of Fraud on the United States Patent & Trademark Office by Iviewit former Intellectual Property attorneys, Kenneth Rubenstein, Proskauer Rose LLP, Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolf & Schlissel, Raymond Anthony Joao, Foley & Lardner, William J. Dick, Douglas Boehm, Steven Becker, Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman, Thomas Coester, Norman Zafman, Farzahd Ahmini, Christopher & Weisberg PA, Krishna Narine, Andrew Barroway, Schiffrin & Barroway and others. This led to the Commissioner of Patents suspending certain of the Iviewit patent applications into an infinite black hole. The form also included inventor change forms which have gone wholly unresolved while patents are in black hole at the United States Patent & Trademark Office. 2004 03 04 - 09 630 939 - 2004 03 04 United States Patent & Trademark Commissioner approval of request for suspension while investigations are pending into Iviewit claims that their attorneys committed both fraud on the USPTO and fraud on Iviewit. Patents remain in limbo. 2004 03 05 Eric Montel Turner of The Florida Bar letter stating he had turned the review over to the chair, notice his failure to capitalize the undefined term chair, as if his chair was reviewing the matters, this becomes hysterical in next letters. 2004 03 12 Iviewit response to Virginia Bar decision regarding William J. Dick and Foley & Lardner showing that the patents were suspended based on charges that Dick was involved in fraud on the United States Patent & Trademark Office and fraud on Iviewit and to reopen his case in light of this new and damaging evidence. Also, the IP docket submitted by Dick in his response to the Virginia Bar was found by the USPTO to be fraught with fraud. Yet, Virginia Bar held fast on their decisions despite compelling evidence to investigate. 2004 03 16 - AICPA letter regarding the complaint against Gerald Lewin, Goldstein & Lewin Co. and Erika Lewin seeking more information. This investigation is then derailed by a new investigator who claims the AICPA does not have funds to investigate and that we should go to the Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation, where Lewin slips out of that complaint, again appearing a total denial of due process. 2004 03 17 Iviewit letter to Special Agent Stephen Lucchesi of the Federal Bureau of Investigation in West Palm Beach Florida requesting investigation of the Iviewit matters. Filing with the United States Patent & Trademark Office claiming that per the direction of Harry I. Moatz, Director of the Office of Enrollment & Discipline, Iviewit & Crossbow Ventures were seeking the Commissioner of Patents to suspend the Iviewit patents based on evidence of Fraud on the United States Patent & Trademark Office by Iviewit former Intellectual Property attorneys, Kenneth Rubenstein, Proskauer Rose LLP, Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolf & Schlissel, Raymond Anthony Joao, Foley & Lardner, William J. Dick, Douglas Boehm, Steven Becker, Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman, Thomas Coester, Norman Zafman, Farzahd Ahmini, Christopher & Weisberg PA, Krishna Narine, Andrew Barroway, Schiffrin & Barroway and others. This led to the Commissioner of Patents suspending certain of the Iviewit patent applications into an infinite black hole. The form also included inventor change forms which have gone wholly unresolved while patents are in black hole at the United States Patent & Trademark Office.' 2004 03 22 Portfolio Compilation Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolf & Schlissel, Foley & Lardner & Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman which shows inconsistencies between the firms on the patent owners, inventors and assignees. 2004 03 22 William J. Dick Virginia Bar Iviewit rebuttal 2,881 pages of great evidence for the IP crimes. 2004 03 23 Letter to Shareholders showing Iviewit is being billed for Utley patents, the billings appear to be fraudulent and to attempt to justify the Utley patents once they were discovered, nice try at a cover up. 2004 03 23 United States Patent & Trademark Office correspondence showing that the Utley patents are not the property of Iviewit, the inventors are not the Iviewit inventors and the owners and assignees are not the Iviewit Companies. 2004 03 23 United States Patent & Trademark Office correspondence showing that the Utley patents are not the property of Iviewit, the inventors are not the Iviewit inventors and the owners and assignees are not the Iviewit Companies. 2004 03 23 United States Patent & Trademark Office correspondence showing that the Utley patents are not the property of Iviewit, the inventors are not the Iviewit inventors and the owners and assignees are not the Iviewit Companies. 2004 03 25 Patent Portfolio prepared by Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman and reviewed by Weider of the United States Patent & Trademark Office whereby it was found there appeared a mass of fraud and this led to Commissioner of Patents suspending the IP. 2004 03 25 Patent Portfolio prepared by Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman and reviewed by Weider of the United States Patent & Trademark Office whereby it was found there appeared a mass of fraud and this led to Commissioner of Patents suspending the IP. 2004 03 26 Moatz letter to take time responding for complaint. 2004 03 29 United States Patent & Trademark Office Commissioner suspends Iviewit patents based on allegations of fraud on the USPTO and Iviewit. 2004 03 29 United States Patent & Trademark Office Commissioner suspends Iviewit patents based on allegations of fraud on the USPTO and Iviewit. 2004 03 29 Withdrawal of attorneys Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman and Foley & Lardner. 2004 03 30 Corporate formation chart based on evidence recovered from Iviewit files and files from Proskauer Rose copied in Proskauer v. Iviewit case, showing a litany of corporations and name changes. This excersize was preformed after learning from the United States Patent & Trademark Office - Harry I. Moatz, that patents had been assigned to companies they should not have been assigned too. 2004 04 03 - 09 587 730 - 2004 04 03 United States Patent & Trademark Office approval of Request for Suspension of the patent based on allegations of fraud on the United States Patent & Trademark Office by Iviewit patent attorneys. This letter was also sent to the accused to notify them of the liability and for them to report such to their liability carriers. 2004 04 19 - 09 587 026 - 57103-115 2004 04 19 United States Patent & Trademark Office approval of Request for Suspension of the patent based on allegations of fraud on the United States Patent & Trademark Office by Iviewit patent attorneys. 2004 04 21 Letter to Iviewit Shareholders and Directors regarding the fraud uncovered at the United States Patent & Trademark Office and the corporate fraud discovered. 2004 04 21 Letter to Iviewit Shareholders and Directors regarding the fraud uncovered at the United States Patent & Trademark Office and the corporate fraud discovered. 2004 04 29 Chart prepared to explain as best as possible on the limited evidence at the time how the patent and corporate scheme was presumed to have occurred. 2004 04 30 Director and Officers Meeting Agenda. 2004 04 30 Director and Officers Meeting Agenda. 2004 04 30 Response to AICPA request for more information regarding complaints against Gerald R. Lewin, Erika Lewin and Goldstein Lewin & Co. CPA's 2004 04 30 Response to AICPA request for more information regarding complaints against Gerald R. Lewin, Erika Lewin and Goldstein Lewin & Co. CPA's 2004 04 30 Teleconference Minutes from Directors and Officers meeting regarding the fraud discovered. 2004 04 21 Letter to Iviewit Shareholders and Directors regarding the fraud uncovered at the United States Patent & Trademark Office and the corporate fraud discovered. 2004 05 01 Iviewit letters to former Officers and Directors regarding the information uncovered at the United States Patent & Trademark Office and regarding the corporate fraud and other crimes. This question set was for Gerald Lewin of Goldstein & Lewin Co. 2004 05 02 Minutes of meeting with former Board and Officers. 2004 05 02 Teleconference Minutes of Board meeting. 2004 05 13 Iviewit letters to former Officers and Directors regarding the information uncovered at the United States Patent & Trademark Office and regarding the corporate fraud and other crimes. This question set was for Christopher Clark Wheeler of Proskauer Rose LLP. 2004 05 19 Complaint filed against Steven C. Krane and Proskauer Rose LLP at the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee to strike the conflicted response of Krane who violated his public office positions in representing his firm and partner Kenneth Rubenstein in their bar complaints. 2004 05 19 Complaint filed against Steven C. Krane and Proskauer Rose LLP at the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee with Thomas Cahill to strike the conflicted response of Krane who violated his public office positions in representing his firm and partner Kenneth Rubenstein in their bar complaints. 2004 05 19 Iviewit letter to the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee to strike the conflicted response of Steven C. Krane of Proskauer in the Kenneth Rubenstein and Proskauer Rose LLP complaint filed and a formal request for investigation of Krane for such violations of his public offices. 2004 05 20 Iviewit letter to the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee to strike the conflicted response of Steven C. Krane of Proskauer in the Kenneth Rubenstein and Proskauer Rose LLP complaint filed and a formal request for investigation of Krane for such violations of his public offices. 2004 05 21 Eric Montel Turner of the Florida Bar's response to the Iviewit petition to the Florida Supreme Court, note the illiteracy rate in the response that makes it impossible to determine what exactly he is saying. 2004 05 21 Eric Montel Turner of the Florida Bar's response to the Iviewit petition to the Florida Supreme Court, note the illiteracy rate in the response that makes it impossible to determine what exactly he is saying. 2004 05 21 Steven C. Krane of Proskauer Rose response to the complaint filed against him and requesting that his responses be stricken from the Rubenstein complaint. Krane fails to disclose his roles at both the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee and The New York State Bar which both preclude him from handling complaints against his firm and partner, especially where he has personal and professional interests. The infamous Krane suicide note. 2004 05 21 Iviewit letters to former Officers and Directors regarding the information uncovered at the United States Patent & Trademark Office and regarding the corporate fraud and other crimes. This question set was for Kenneth Rubenstein of Proskauer Rose LLP and MPEGLA LLC. 2004 05 24 Eric Turner of The Florida Bar letter telling Iviewit to put everything in writing to avoid misunderstandings. 2004 05 24 Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee letter to strike the responses of Steven C. Krane of Proskaeur Rose for conflicts of interest and violations of public offices. 2004 05 25 Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee letter to strike the responses of Steven C. Krane of Proskaeur Rose for conflicts of interest and violations of public officesSupreme Court Strike Response of Steven Krane for Conflict of Interest & Violation of Public Offices. 2004 05 26 - Iviewit response to Steven C. Krane letter dated May 21, 2004 asking the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee's, Chief Counsel, Thomas Cahill to strike all Krane responses and pointing out his roles at the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee and NYSBA and other ethics departments that all made his representations violations of his public offices. 2004 05 26 Biography of Steven C. Krane showing conflicting roles at Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee, the NYSBA and other ethics departments that would have precluded him from representing his Proskauer partner Rubenstein, his firm Proskauer and himself. 2004 05 26 - Iviewit response to Steven C. Krane letter dated May 21, 2004 asking the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee's, Chief Counsel, Thomas Cahill to strike all Krane responses and pointing out his roles at the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee and NYSBA and other ethics departments that all made his representations violations of his public offices. 2004 05 26 Iviewit letter to Foley & Lardner 2004 05 27 - Eric Turner Response to letter dated 2004 05 21 2004 05 27 - Iviewit Letter to Eric Turner of The Florida Bar letter dated May 21, 2004. 2004 06 01 - Eric Turner of The Florida Bar regarding the process for elevating the Christopher Clark Wheeler Florida Bar complaint. This comes after Turner tried to claim he was the final arbiter for The Florida Bar. 2004 06 01 - Eric Turner of The Florida Bar regarding the process for elevating the Christopher Clark Wheeler Florida Bar complaint. This comes after Turner tried to claim he was the final arbiter for The Florida Bar. 2004 06 02 - Iviewit letter to Eric Turner of The Florida Bar. 2004 06 06 The Florida Bar taped call regarding confirming that Matthew Triggs of Proskauer had a role with a Florida Bar Grievance Committee within the year which precluded him from representing any party for a period of one year, especially his partner and his law firm, especially where he had personal and professional interests in the outcome and finally where he was representing Proskauer simultaneously in the Proskauer v. Iviewit lawsuit. 2004 06 14 Japanese Office Action. 2004 06 17 Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee's, Chief Counsel, Thomas Cahill's Motion to move the complaints of Steven C. Krane, Proskauer and Kenneth Rubenstein for what he claims to avoid the appearance of impropriety when in fact he knew that Krane had violated his public office. Iviewit had contacted Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe of the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department who informed Iviewit that despite Cahill's initial denial that Krane had any roles with the department, that she was having a meeting with both Cahill and Krane on a Committee at the department. Holy cow Batman, their busted. Cahill writes this biased letter after learning that a complaint was filed against him and it is wholly misleading of the facts. 2004 06 23 - Paul J. Curran, Chairman of the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee moving the complaint filed against Thomas J. Cahill for investigation according to department rules. A complaint was filed against Thomas J. Cahill for his involvement with lying about Steven C. Krane's conflicts and violations of public offices. 2004 06 23 Iviewit faxs the disciplinary complaint filed against Thomas J. Cahill to Paul J. Curran for investigation. 2004 06 23 Cahill Petition. 2004 06 24 Iviewit letter to Eric Turner of the Florida Bar demanding information regarding the positions of Matthew Triggs, Christopher Clark Wheeler and Spencer Sax of Sax Sachs & Klien to determine further violations of public offices revealed by the Triggs violation of public offices and noticing him that Iviewit would be petitioning the Florida Supreme Court. 2004 06 29 - Complaint against Steven C. Krane of Proskauer Rose sent to Paul J. Curran, Chairman of the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee. 2004 06 30 The Florida Bar complaint against Eric Montel Turner for his violations of his Florida Bar public office position. 2004 06 30 The Florida Bar's President, Kelly Overstreet Johnson, accepting Iviewit complaint letters but fails to disclose her conflicts. Johnson was conflicted with the Wheeler complaint as she worked at the Florida law firm of Broad & Cassel with Wheeler's brother, James Wheeler and failed to disclose such while taking complaint information in. 2004 06 30 Christopher Clark Wheeler biography showing his false claims of Florida Bar positions, which is a violation of attorney conduct rules of Florida, this forms the base for yet another complaint against Wheeler for false advertising. 2004 07 01 Debroah Yarbrough, a clerk for the Florida Supreme Court fax cover telling her the Florida Bar intended on destroying files and hiding the case so it could not be sent to the Florida Supreme Court. 2004 07 01 Eric Turner Complaint Against Eric Turner The Florida Bar 2004 07 01 Eric M. Turner formal Florida Bar complaint, sent to Turner. 2004 07 01 Florida Supreme Court Case SC04-1078 - Acknowledgement of New Case and Stricken Due to Petitioner Not A Member of The Florida Bar Representing A Corporation. 2004 07 01 Iviewit fax of a Petition for the Florida Supreme Court regarding the Florida Bar crimes being committed by its members. 2004 07 01 Letter to Debbie Yarbrough of the Florida Supreme Court regarding the Florida Bar's half truth on the file destruction of the Christopher Clark Wheeler bar complaint. 2004 07 01 Debroah Yarbrough of the Florida Supreme Court's message regarding Kenneth Marvin of The Florida Bar's misleading Yarbrough, stating The Florida Bar would return the files to Iviewit. Marvin fails to state that The Florida Bar would destroy their work product that was necessary to evaluate the confirmed violation of public office by Matthew Triggs for prosecution. 2004 07 02 Kenneth Marvin of The Florida Bar letter regarding the Eric Montel Turner Florida Bar complaint, stating that the Turner violations of his public office were employer/employee matters and that he would not docket or process the formal filed complaint. This is inapposite of Florida Constitution and The Rules Regulating the Florida Bar. 2004 07 06 Iviewit Petition to the Florida Supreme Court regarding the Christopher C. Wheeler bar complaint, the Matthew Triggs complaint and the Eric M. Turner complaint. FINAL NOTARIZED 2004 07 08 Iviewit Motion to the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department regarding the Cahill complaint. 2004 07 08 Iviewit Motion to the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department regarding the conflicts and violations of public offices of Kenneth Rubenstein, Proskauer Rose, Steven C. Krane, Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolf & Schlissel and Raymond A. Joao and requesting immediate investigation and to move the complaints. 2004 07 09 The Florida Bar's counsel John Anthony Boggs letter confirming the violation of public office by Matthew Triggs of Proskauer in the handling of his Proskauer Partner Wheeler and his firm Proskauer. Boggs then tries to cite law that was only proposed as a defense of Wheeler and states shoulda coulda woulda logic in attempts to justify the violation. Funny that the Florida Bar is acting like Wheeler's personal defense. 2004 07 09 The Florida Bar's counsel John Anthony Boggs letter confirming the violation of public office by Matthew Triggs of Proskauer in the handling of his Proskauer Partner Wheeler and his firm Proskauer. Boggs then tries to cite law that was only proposed as a defense of Wheeler and states shoulda coulda woulda logic in attempts to justify the violation. Funny that the Florida Bar is acting like Wheeler's personal defense. 2004 07 12 Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee's, Chief Counsel, Thomas Cahill's Motion to move the complaints of Steven C. Krane and Proskauer, note this comes after Cahill has a filed complaint against him, making this further reason for another complaint against him. 2004 07 12 Florida Supreme Court Iviewit docket update. 2004 07 13 Iviewit's second bar complaint against Christopher Clark Wheeler of Proskauer Rose, this goes undocketed and never gets resolved, inapposite The Rules Regulating The Florida Bar and against the Florida Constitution. 2004 07 15 - American Internation Group "AIG" Directors and Officers policy internal affairs letter regarding fraud on AIG committed by Proskauer Rose. 2004 07 15 - American Internation Group "AIG" Directors and Officers policy internal affairs letter regarding fraud on AIG committed by Proskauer Rose. 2004 07 22 John A. Boggs of The Florida Bar receipt of Matthew Triggs bar complaint which was never formally docketed or given procedural due process, inapposite The Rules Regulating The Florida Bar and the Florida Constitution. 2004 07 22 Kelly O. Johnson, President, The Florida Bar, receipt of the Matthew Triggs of Proskauer's bar complaint. Johnson recieves complaint information on Wheeler failing to disclose she works for Wheeler's brother James Wheeler at Broad & Cassel, a small law firm in Florida. 2004 07 22 Matthew Triggs bar complaint at The Florida Bar. The complaint was never docketed or procedurally disposed of, inapposite The Rules Regulating The Florida Bar and the Florida Constitution. 2004 07 22 Matthew Triggs bar complaint at The Florida Bar. The complaint was never docketed or procedurally disposed of, inapposite The Rules Regulating The Florida Bar and the Florida Constitution. BOOKMARKED 2004 07 23 Florida Supreme Court ruling that Iviewit cannot be represented Pro Se, forcing the complaint to be re-filed by Lamont and Bernstein on behalf of the Iviewit Shareholders. Although Florida pulled this trick, the New York Supreme Court did not and allowed Iviewit to be represented by Lamont and Bernstein acting Pro Se. 2004 07 23 - The Affirmed Amended Petition for: Injunctive Relief; Declaratory Relief; Begin Immediate Investigation of Complaint Against Christopher C. Wheeler; and Move Complaints to the Next Highest Level of Review, Void of Conflict of Interest and Appearance Of Impropriety declined based on Pro Se representation of a corporation. 2004 07 26 Iviewit letter to Harry I. Moatz of the United States Patent & Trademark Office regarding failure of patent agents Moatz assigned to return calls regarding upcoming patent suspension deadlines and asking that he request another twelve months of suspension. 2004 07 28 Iviewit response to letter of John A. Boggs of The Florida Bar regarding the complaints of Christopher C. Wheeler of Proskauer, Matthew Triggs of Proskauer and Eric Montel Turner of The Florida Bar and his attempts to obfuscate his duties and other matters of interest. 2004 07 28 Cahill to move Krane. 2004 07 28 Crossbow Ventures signs alongside Iviewit inventors with the United States Patent & Trademark Office charges of Fraud on the Patent Office and requests to change inventors to the Iviewit inventors. 2004 07 28 Iviewit Amended Petition to the Florida Supreme Court Docket #SC04-1078 regarding the crimes committed at The Florida Bar. 2004 07 28 Iviewit Amended Petition to the Florida Supreme Court Docket #SC04-1078 regarding the crimes committed at The Florida Bar. 2004 07 28 Iviewit Amended Petition to the Florida Supreme Court Docket #SC04-1078 regarding the crimes committed at The Florida Bar. 2004 07 28 Iviewit response to John Anthony Boggs of The Florida Bar's letter confirming Matthew Triggs of Proskauer violation of The Rules Regulating The Florida Bar, a violation of his Supreme Court public office position. To note Kelly Overstreet Johnson was copied on this and accepts the document while failing to disclose that she has a major conflict in that she works directly for Christopher Wheeler's brother, James Wheeler at a small Florida law firm Broad & Cassel. 2004 07 28 Iviewit request to the Commissioner of Patents to suspend ALL patents and trademarks of Iviewit's for 12 more months. 2004 07 29 - Supreme Court of Florida Ruling that the style of the Florida Supreme Court case has been changed from Iviewit Holdings, Inc. v. The Florida Bar to Eliot Bernstein, et. al versus The Florida Bar 2004 07 29 Florida Supreme Court Case #SCO4-1078 Ruling that The Florida Bar must halt the planned destruction of the Iviewit bar complaints against Christopher Clark Wheeler of Proskauer. Although they halted this, when they decided to abandon the case, the only Order they gave was in favor of The Florida Bar to destroy the evidence, inapposite Florida record retention laws. 2004 07 29 Florida Supreme Court Case #SCO4-1078 Ruling that The Florida Bar must halt the planned destruction of the Iviewit bar complaints against Christopher Clark Wheeler of Proskauer. Although they halted this, when they decided to abandon the case, the only Order they gave was in favor of The Florida Bar to destroy the evidence, inapposite Florida record retention laws. 2004 07 29 Debroah Yarborough, clerk of the Florida Supreme Court message regarding the ruling that The Florida Bar halt destruction of the Iviewit bar complaints at The Florida Bar message. 2004 08 03 The Florida Bar counsel Eric M. Turner letter trying to explain why the Matthew Triggs complaint for violations of his public office position with The Florida Bar is not being docketed due to its being faxed. The complaint was then mailed but still The Florida Bar never docketed the case. It is remarkable that with a complaint lodged against him in the matters, Turner was allowed to continue acting in the matters. 2004 08 09 Japanese Patent Office investigation letter. Very interesting in that the JPO tries to claim that there is no such thing as fraud in Japan??? 2004 08 11 Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department Orders the complaints against Kenneth Rubenstein, Proskauer, Raymond Joao, Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolf & Schlissel and Steven C. Krane to be moved for immediate investigation due to the appearance of impropriety and conflicts. The case was then transferred to the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division Second Department where further conflicts with Krane were discovered that derailed the investigation and caused a flurry of further complaints against the Second Department members. 2004 08 11 Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department Orders the complaints against Kenneth Rubenstein, Proskauer, Raymond Joao, Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolf & Schlissel and Steven C. Krane to be moved for immediate investigation due to the appearance of impropriety and conflicts. The case was then transferred to the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division Second Department where further conflicts with Krane were discovered that derailed the investigation and caused a flurry of further complaints against the Second Department members. 2004 08 19 Iviewit letter to Andrew H. Goodman of the Virginia Bar regarding the William J. Dick bar complaint and noticing the Virginia Bar of conflicts and violations of public offices found in new York and Florida regarding those investigations. Information from the Florida Bar and the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee was used in Dick's defense of the bar complaint. This should have caused at minimum review of the Dick matters. 2004 08 23 Iviewit letter to the FBI Special Agent Stephen Lucchesi regarding his taking the matters to the US Attorney. 2004 08 25 Iviewit letter to Andrew H. Goodman of the Virginia Bar regarding the William J. Dick bar complaint and noticing the Virginia Bar of conflicts and violations of public offices found in new York and Florida regarding those investigations. Information from the Florida Bar and the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee was used in Dick's defense of the bar complaint. This should have caused at minimum review of the Dick matters. 2004 08 27 Patent Office correspondence. 2004 09 07 Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee's, Chief Counsel, Thomas Cahill's cover letter transferring the complaints of Steven C. Krane, Proskauer, Kenneth Rubenstein, Raymond Joao & Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolf & Schlissel due to the unanimous decision by five justices of the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department. Very interesting that Cahill handles this as he is part of an ongoing investigation for his part in the crimes at the court and thus acts in conflict and violation of his public office. What is damning is that Cahill tries to impart to the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division Second Department that they are do as they please with the cases, which is not what the justices ordered, they ordered IMMEDIATE INVESTIGATION, yet Cahill tries to help himself and his buddies out of the mess again. 2004 09 08 NEWS ARTICLE - Sony release a zoom TV. 2004 09 09 Steven C. Krane of Proskauer Rose, after being implicated for conflicts and violations of his Supreme Court and other public office positions violations starts working on a new biography of himself cutting what is implicating from his past as if it would disappear from his cover up. This is as funny as the picture of Krane at the Proskauer website where he replaces the picture where he weighs about 500 pounds with one from years earlier before he engorged himself in greed. You can run but you cannot hide Mr. Unethical. "2004 09 11 Iviewit files with LAWYERS FUND FOR CLIENT PROTECTION OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK." 2004 09 07 Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee's, Chief Counsel, Thomas Cahill's cover letter transferring the complaints of Steven C. Krane, Proskauer, Kenneth Rubenstein, Raymond Joao & Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolf & Schlissel due to the unanimous decision by five justices of the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department. Very interesting that Cahill handles this as he is part of an ongoing investigation for his part in the crimes at the court and thus acts in conflict and violation of his public office. What is damning is that Cahill tries to impart to the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division Second Department that they are do as they please with the cases, which is not what the justices ordered, they ordered IMMEDIATE INVESTIGATION, yet Cahill tries to help himself and his buddies out of the mess again. 2004 09 21 Iviewit letter to Andrew Goodman of the Virginia Bar regarding William Dick of Foley & Lardner bar complaint, noticing the VA bar of the violations of public offices found in New York and Florida in the related attorney complaints of Christopher Clark Wheeler, Kenneth Rubenstein, Raymond Joao, Steven C. Krane and Matthew Triggs. 2004 09 22 United States Patent & Trademark Office second six month Suspension Notice. Note that the USPTO claims they are being suspended pending investigation into the inventor and other issues presented. The patents remain in limbo. 2004 10 05 Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division Second Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee's, Chief Counsel, Diana Maxfield Kearse trying to get Steven C. Krane, Proskauer, Kenneth Rubenstein and Raymond Joao out of the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department Court ORDER for immediate investigation by claiming she reviewed and found no evidence of misconduct. This decision despite that she was ordered to investigate by five justice who reviewed the materials and found reason to Order investigations. No of the accused had to put a defense up, no witnesses were contacted, no evidence tested and then Kearse admits that she is conflicted with Krane but refuses to answer questions regarding her conflict and tells Iviewit to put any request for that information in writing. Kearse is charged with a complaint for her undisclosed conflicts after she fails to respond to the written request for disclosure of her conflicts with both Krane and Judge Judith Kaye. 2004 10 07 Iviewit Petition to the Florida Supreme Court requesting intervention in the Boca Raton Police Department investigation and the FBI investigation as they tried to set up a fake meeting with members of the SEC and this caused grave concerns that it was to intimidate inventor Bernstein to drop his charges against the Boca PD regarding their failure to investigate and possible internal corruptions. 2004 10 08 Taped Florida Bar message confirming Matthew Triggs of Proskauer's dates of service with The Florida Bar. This confirms that Triggs acted in violation of his public office when he represented Christopher C. Wheeler in his Florida Bar complaint. 2004 10 08 Florida Supreme Court SC104 1078 Iviewit Petition to the Florida Supreme Court requesting intervention in the Boca Raton Police Department investigation and the FBI investigation as they tried to set up a fake meeting with members of the SEC and this caused grave concerns that it was to intimidate inventor Bernstein to drop his charges against the Boca PD regarding their failure to investigate and possible internal corruptions. 2004 10 08 Taped Florida Bar message confirming Matthew Triggs of Proskauer's dates of service with The Florida Bar. This confirms that Triggs acted in violation of his public office when he represented Christopher C. Wheeler in his Florida Bar complaint. 2004 10 10 Letter from David White of the European Patent Office regarding starting investigations with the legal department. 2004 10 11 Florida Supreme Court Ruling in Case #SCO4-1078 that the Florida Bar is to respond to the Iviewit Petition. This despite Eric Montel Turner's prior claims that the Florida Supreme Court would not be able to review the matters as The Florida Bar was the final arbiter. 2004 10 13 - Iviewit Florida Supreme Court case docket #SC104-1078 Update Docket cert 2004 10 13 AIG D&O letter, stating they are investigating the matters. 2004 10 15 Florida Supreme Court Denial of Motion for protective custody and to over sight investigations at the FBI and Boca Raton PD for failure to invoke courts jurisdiction. 2004 10 15 Florida Supreme Court Denial of Motion for Declaratory Relief; Intervene in Third Party Investigations of the Boca Raton Police Department, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the Securities and Exchange Commission with the Courts oversight to ensure due process and an emergency order for the Immediate Protective Custody of Eliot I. Bernstein, Candice M. Bernstein, Joshua EZ Bernstein, Jacob NA Bernstein, Daniel EAO Bernstein, P. Stephen Lamont & P. Stephen Lamont II - Failure to Invoke Court Jurisdiction 2004 10 15 United States Patent & Trademark Office correspondence regarding suspensions. 2004 10 18 Iviewit letter to Martin Gold and Paul Curran to move the complaint of Thomas J. Cahill from the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee to a non conflicted third party, based on the Court Order for investigation of Kenneth Rubenstein, Proskauer Rose, Steven C. Krane and Raymond Joao due to conflicts and the appearance of impropriety. 2004 10 18 Kelly Overstreet Johnson, President of The Florida Bar read receipt on Service of the Florida Supreme Court petition. Johnson fails to disclose at this time or previously that she has conflict with Christopher C. Wheeler's brother, James Wheeler of Broad & Cassel, as she works for him at the law firm. 2004 10 20 AIG POLICY 872-99-99 showing Brian G. Utley committed fraud on the application and that the policy is issued on a non-existent company. 2004 10 20 AIG POLICY 872-99-99 showing Brian G. Utley committed fraud on the application and that the policy is issued on a non-existent company. 2004 10 22 Eric Turner of The Florida Bar response to the Iviewit Petition filed with the Florida Supreme Court. There are no comments on this document but try to pick out the numerous grammatical errors for fun. The response addresses none of the issues in the filed Petition and thus Iviewit moves for a default judgement. 2004 10 22 Eric Turner of The Florida Bar response to the Iviewit Petition filed with the Florida Supreme Court. There are comments on this document showing the illiteracy of the response. The response addresses none of the issues in the filed Petition and thus Iviewit moves for a default judgement. 2004 10 22 Florida Bar to Supreme Court eib comments 2004 10 25 Petition Response 09 522 721.zip 2004 10 26 Iviewit letter response to Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division Second Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee's, Chief Counsel, Diana Maxfield Kearse, rebutting her decision in spite of the Court Order for investigation, to dismiss the complaints against Kenneth Rubenstein, Proskauer Rose, Steven C. Krane, Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolf & Schlissel and Raymond Joao on review, not investigation. The letter also asks Kearse to disclose the conflicts she had with Krane and Judge Judith Kaye in writing as she requested. 2004 10 26 Iviewit letter response to Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division Second Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee's, Chief Counsel, Diana Maxfield Kearse, rebutting her decision in spite of the Court Order for investigation, to dismiss the complaints against Kenneth Rubenstein, Proskauer Rose, Steven C. Krane, Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolf & Schlissel and Raymond Joao on review, not investigation. The letter also asks Kearse to disclose the conflicts she had with Krane and Judge Judith Kaye in writing as she requested. 2004 10 26 St Paul Insurance Company investigation letter written by law firm Garcia & Stallone regarding Raymond A. Joao fraud issues. 2004 11 04 Florida Department of Professional Regulation letter requesting more information regarding the complaints filed against Gerald Lewin, Erika Lewin and Goldstein Lewin & Co. CPA's. Iviewit was forced to take complaints here as the AICPA suddenly in the middle of investigation terminated their investigation stating they had no money and told Iviewit to take the complaints to the DPR who later dismissed the complaints, wonder how much this cost. 2004 11 04 Iviewit filed with Florida Supreme Court a Motion to Extend Response SC04-1078. 2004 11 09 - Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division Second Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee's, Chief Counsel, Diana Maxfield Kearse, stating that a committee member would review if the complaints ordered for investigation by the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department justices would be reopened for investigation, note no investigation was ever done but later as they get deeper in their bs, they try to state that the review was an investigation and thus they complied with the First Department order. 2004 11 10 - Florida Supreme Court - Grant Extension of Time 2004 11 11 Florida Supreme Court Case #SC04-1078 Iviewit response to The Florida Bar response to the Iviewit Petition filed. 2004 11 15 Florida Supreme Court Case #SC04-1078 Iviewit response to The Florida Bar response to the Iviewit Petition filed. 2004 11 15 Florida Supreme Court Case #SC04-1078 Iviewit response to The Florida Bar response to the Iviewit Petition filed. 2004 11 15 Florida Supreme Court Case #SC04-1078 Iviewit response to The Florida Bar response to the Iviewit Petition filed. CERT 2004 11 22 Iviewit letter response to Garcia and Stallone in regard to the fraud exposed with their client Raymond A. Joao whose is covered by St. Paul Insurance. Letter notifies them that Joao was ordered for investigation by the First Department which he failed to disclose to St. Paul. 2004 11 25 European Patent Office letter response to letters exposing them to fraud on the USPTO and Iviewit. 2004 11 30 08-59 THE STATE OF NEW YORK COURT OF APPEALS PSL G. 2004 12 15 Delray Beach Florida Drunk Driving Arrest Report for Felony DUI with injury against Christopher Clark Wheeler of Proskauer Rose. You gotta read what his wife says, go Deanna!!! 2004 12 15 Delray Beach Florida Drunk Driving Arrest Report for Felony DUI with injury against Christopher Clark Wheeler of Proskauer Rose. You gotta read what his wife says, go Deanna!!! 2004 12 20 Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division Second Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee's, Chairman, Lawrence DiGiovanna's review of Kearse decision and siding with her decision to not investigate and dismiss based on review, despite the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department court Order to investigate, not review. For his part in obfuscating justice a complaint is filed against both Kearse and DiGiovanna which both go undocketed and procedurally are derailed by Kearse who even handles the complaint against herself??? 2004 12 22 United States Patent & Trademark Office letter to James Groody regarding the patent suspensions. 2004 12 24 Stephen Kaye of Proskauer Rose biography, yes this is the husband of Judge Judith Kaye, whose former law clerk was Steven Krane, partner with Stephen Kaye at Proskauer in the Intellectual Property group that was formed immediately after Proskauer took disclosures of the Iviewit inventions, then ran out and hired Rubenstein with his MPEGLA pools to steal the Iviewit inventions. Here we finally see how the denial of due process in New York was being effectuated and how the crimes were going uninvestigated and were derailed. 2004 12 24 Steven C. Krane of Proskauer Rose, after being implicated for conflicts and violations of his Supreme Court and other public office positions violations starts working on a new biography of himself cutting what is implicating from his past as if it would disappear from his cover up. This is as funny as the picture of Krane at the Proskauer website where he replaces the picture where he weighs about 500 pounds with one from years earlier before he engorged himself in greed. You can run but you cannot hide Mr. Unethical. 2005 01 10 Iviewit letter response to 2004 12 20 Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division Second Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee's, Chairman, Lawrence DiGiovanna's review of Kearse decision to not investigate inapposite of the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department order to investigate and other issues regarding conflicts with Steven C. Krane and Chief Judge Judith Kaye. 2005 01 12 - Florida Supreme Court Petition For All Writs Jurisdiction filed by Iviewit is denied and allows the Florida Bar to destroy the Iviewit complaint against Christopher Clark Wheeler to be destroyed. After receiving a non response to the Petition filed by The Florida Bar, that wholly failed to respond to the substantive issues of the Petition the Florida Supreme Court ordered them to respond to. The case is thrown so that the Florida Supreme Court does not have to account for its members of The Florida Bar or be liable for them, as it is learned there is a major conflict of interest between the Florida Supreme Court and the Florida Bar, in that the Florida Supreme Court insurance policy covers the state actors who work for The Florida Bar, which is under the aegis of The Florida Supreme Court as a direct extension of that court. My how the conflicts continue to pile up, The Florida Supreme Court should have refused the case and sent it to a federal court as they were conflicted. This decision means that complaints against Matthew Triggs of Proskauer who violated his public offices are not docketed and disposed of according to Florida law and acts to protect Proskauer from immediate prosecution. This aiding and abetting is to be challenged next at the United States Supreme Court, that also denies to hear the case, which acts further to prevent the complaints from formal disposition and the crimes to get buried. 2005 01 12 - Florida Supreme Court - Order, Petitioners Motion for Judgment Non Prosequitur is Hereby Denied, There goes due process and the right to complain against government officials found violating Supreme Court rules. Hello Communist America. 2005 01 12 Florida Supreme Court Petition for All Writs Jurisdiction Denied ~ Destroy Files 2005 01 13 09 587 734 United States Patent & Trademark Office approval of additional six month suspension based on allegations of fraud on the USPTO and Iviewit. 2005 01 25 - Draft Iviewit response to Florida Supreme Court Ruling 2005 01 26 SC04-1078 Iviewit filed with Supreme Court of Florida for a Motion for Rehearing Clarification and Certification. 2005 02 03 Palm Beach Post NEWS ARTICLE regarding Delray Beach Florida Drunk Driving Felony DUI with injury charges against Christopher Clark Wheeler of Proskauer Rose. 2005 02 05 - BOCA RATON NEWS ARTICLE Regarding Christopher Wheeler's DUI. What is amazing to note is that Eric M. Turner of The Florida Bar (the guy who derails the Wheeler complaints filed by Iviewit) attempts to defend Christopher Wheeler for his drunk driving charges and he falsely states to the press that the DUI was a Misdemeanor when in fact, it was charged as a felony due to the injuries suffered by the victim. The DUI was a Felony charge as injury was incurred and as noted in the Police Report. This shows unequivocally that Turner will go to any length to protect Wheeler using The Florida Bar to achieve this end. Wheeler's license was not suspended due to his DUI, perhaps Turner defended him. Wonder if they had to give Turner a second briefcase for this? 2005 02 05 Florida Sun Sentinel NEWS ARTICLE regarding the arrest of Christopher Wheeler of Proskauer for felony DUI with injury. 2005 02 14 09 630 939 United States Patent & Trademark Office approval of additional six month suspension based on allegations of fraud on the USPTO and Iviewit. 2005 02 15 The Florida Bar responds to the Florida Supreme Court regarding the Motion for Clarification, Rehearing and Certification filed by Iviewit. 2005 02 23 Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division Second Department, Clerk, James E. Pelzer letter stating he is taking the matter of the decisions to review by Diana Maxfield Kearse, Chief Counsel of the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division Second Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee and Lawrence DiGiovanna, Chairman of the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division Second Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee, instead of investigating as ordered by the First Department justices to the Presiding Justice of the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division Second Department, A. Gail Prudenti, for a decision. 2005 02 23 Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division Second Department, Clerk, James E. Pelzer letter stating he is taking the matter of the decisions to review by Diana Maxfield Kearse, Chief Counsel of the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division Second Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee and Lawrence DiGiovanna, Chairman of the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division Second Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee, instead of investigating as ordered by the First Department justices to the Presiding Justice of the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division Second Department, A. Gail Prudenti, for a decision. 2005 02 25 Iviewit response to the European Patent Office legal department, Lise Dybdahl, letter requesting suspension of the European patent applications. 2005 03 01 Iviewit filed Motion to Florida Supreme Court Case SC04-1078 regarding keeping The Florida Bar files on Christopher C. Wheeler, Proskauer, Matthew Triggs, Eric M. Turner, John Anthony Boggs, Lorraine Christine Hoffman, Kenneth Marvin and others for review by the United States Supreme Court and other investigators. Requesting files be maintained according to Florida Record Retention laws + for the 20 year life of the patents, as the records are invaluable records and contain information in the files of violations of public offices and other matters that have not been investigated. 2005 03 05 Florida Supreme Court Docket Entry with the Christopher Wheeler of Proskauer Driving Under the Influence Felony Charge against him, welcome to Supreme Court history Chris, as the biggest ahole in court history. 2005 03 09 Insipid Little Cockroaches of Minimal Brain. Self explanatory draft. 2005 03 11 Iviewit letter to Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division Second Department, Clerk, James E. Pelzer regarding conflicts of interest found with State of New York Court of Appeals, Chief Judge of the State of New York, Judith S. Kaye and Steven C. Krane and asking that any new investigators sign that they have no conflicts with any of the Iviewit accused to prevent further conflicts which force further complaints. 2005 03 14 Pictures of the Car Bombing of Inventor Bernstein's Family Minivan that fire investigator Rick Lee of the Boynton Beach Fire Department claimed was caused by accelarants and blew up three cars next to it. The FBI appears to have lost both the investigation files and the investigator regarding this and the Iviewit matters. The images use Iviewit technology for zoom and panning on the images. Check out where the minivan hood was blown out, was this where the car bomb was??? 2005 03 14 Pictures of the Car Bombing of Inventor Bernstein's Family Minivan that fire investigator Rick Lee of the Boynton Beach Fire Department claimed was caused by accelarants and blew up three cars next to it. The FBI appears to have lost both the investigation files and the investigator regarding this and the Iviewit matters. The images use Iviewit technology for zoom and panning on the images. Check out where the minivan hood was blown out, was this where the car bomb was??? 2005 03 16 Iviewit letter to Stephen Lucchesi of the Federal Bureau of Investigation regarding the bombing of inventor Eliot I. Bernstein's family minivan and request that he enjoin investigation per Rick Lee of Boynton Beach Florida fire department. This letter and the rest of the two years of Iviewit files regarding the patent crimes and other crimes against the United States are lost and so is Lucchesi who disappears from the Department of Justice and even they do not know where he is. The FBI Palm Beach office refers the matter to the Department of Justice Inspector General, Glenn Fine, who requests that the FBI Office of Professional Responsibility investigate. 2005 03 16 Iviewit letter to Stephen Lucchesi of the Federal Bureau of Investigation regarding the bombing of inventor Eliot I. Bernstein's family minivan and request that he enjoin investigation per Rick Lee of Boynton Beach Florida fire department. This letter and the rest of the two years of Iviewit files regarding the patent crimes and other crimes against the United States are lost and so is Lucchesi who disappears from the Department of Justice and even they do not know where he is. The FBI Palm Beach office refers the matter to the Department of Justice Inspector General, Glenn Fine, who requests that the FBI Office of Professional Responsibility investigate. 2005 03 17 Hague Police to have FBI contact them. 2005 03 18 Diana Maxfield Kearse, Chief Counsel of the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division Second Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee sends a letter stating that they had lost a letter and it was mysteriously returned by the post office. The letter attempts to claim an investigation was done by a Committee in hopes that the fact that she reviewed the matter and dismissed it on review was now moot somehow. What fails to be noted is the fact that this was an investigation that none of the accused had to respond to, no witnesses provided were interviewed, no documents were examined. This document serves for further charges against Kearse for even attempting to use the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division Second Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee letterhead to continue the cover up for the accused. The document appears to be evidence of mail fraud as well. 2005 03 27 Steven Krane NYSBA Positions. 2005 04 05 Krane ties to Bush. 2005 04 09 New York Supreme Second Dept Pelzer Letter Krane comments 2005 04 09 Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division Second Department, Clerk, James E. Pelzer, letter whereby Pelzer, who is not an actor in the disciplinary, now attempts to claim that A. Gail Prudenti had decided to blow off the investigations, which he tries to now claim were completed, although all prior information states no investigation was done in lieu of being dismissed on review, inapposite the First Department court order stating immediate investigation was to be done. He attempts to defend Krane, showing his obvious bias, instead of relying on the supposed investigations conclusions where we are sure Krane had a lawyer representing his interests. This attempts to conclude based on a dismissal on review that Krane was not conflicted using department letterhead to deny due process and form a defense for Krane. Pelzer nor Prudenti are part of the disciplinary process and are conflicted with Krane and Kaye and what is amazing is that they should be responding to the First Department court that ordered the investigation, not Eliot Bernstein and Stephen Lamont. This is very telling. 2005 04 20 Response to 2005 04 09 Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division Second Department, Clerk, James E. Pelzer, letter. Very interesting reading into how due process was denied and how court ordered investigations were derailed. 2005 04 25 Florida Supreme Court Denial of Motion for Rehearing Clarification and Certification. 2005 04 25 Pataki & Spitzer Cover Letter for Document 2005 05 25 European Patent Office "EPO" letter denying suspension of European patents and referring the matters of fraud on the EPO to the Institute of Professional Representatives before the European Patent Office "EPI" which regulates licensed legal representatives. Later the EPI during an investigation, sends over documents including a document in response to an official office action that is missing exhibits and the language of the letter is altered, evidencing fraud on the EPO. Iviewit has requested immediate intervention by the FBI and Interpol to inspect the documents for forgery and fraud upon the EPO, this has gone into limbo, especially because the FBI investigator and Iviewit FBI files are now missing from the FBI. The matters of the FBI have been elevated to the Department of Justice Inspector General Glenn A. Fine and H. Marshall Jarrett of the FBI Office of Professional Responsibility for investigation. 2005 06 18 - Iviewit Florida Supreme Court Case Docket SC04-1078. 2005 06 18 Iviewit letter to James Groody of the United States Patent & Trademark Office & Department of Justice Inspector General Glenn Fine regarding the USPTO suspensions. 2005 06 20 Letter to USPTO, FBI and others regarding viral attachments to emails and reporting of such activity to the Internet Crime Bureau. 2005 06 27 Department of Business Professional Regulation Lewin. 2005 07 13 Supreme Court Petition for Extension of Time. 2005 07 20 - 09 587730 United States Patent & Trademark Office suspension, second six months out of three possible. 2005 08 14 Steven C. Krane at Proskauer is counsel for the New York State Bar Association. 2005 08 26 Letter from the European Patent Office regarding patent filing 00955352 being lost. 2005 10 03 United States Patent & Trademark Office dismisses Iviewit Petition to revive abandoned patent 09 522 721, although Moatz has requested that all abandoned patents be revived. Interesting that it is sent to Blakely Sokoloff after Iviewit had filed to have all prior patent counsel removed from the applications as they are and remain under investigation by Harry I. Moatz, Director of the Office of Enrollment and Discipline for the United States Patent & Trademark Office. 2005 10 05 Iviewit Patent 09 587 026 Notice of Abandonment from the United States Patent & Trademark Office. 2005 11 18 Chris Mercer of the Institute of Professional Representatives before the European Patent Office EPI Mercer Investigation. This investigation would at first be closed and then reopened leading to discovery of fraudulent documents in the EPO files. 2005 11 28 United States Supreme Court Denial of Writ of Certiorari to review the Florida Supreme Court case. This wholly blocks Iviewit from filing complaints against public officers found violating Florida Supreme Court office positions. 2005 12 21 Iviewit response to the European Patent Office regarding suspending the patents pending investigations of fraud on the EPO. 2006 01 06 inewswire. 2006 01 07 Iviewit News Release regarding Representative Nita M. Lowey (D-NY 18th) taking the Iviewit matters to Representative John D. Dingell (D-MI 15th), Chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, who then forwards the matters for investigation to the House Judiciary Committee, under the direction of The Honorable John Conyers Jr. (D-MI 14th). 2006 01 18 Iviewit NEWS ARTICLE by Sachin Garg of Eworld. Garg was threatened by unknown parties to take down the article. 2006 01 19 NEWS ARTICLE "Tech Dirt" reports on Iviewit. 2006 03 03 United States Patent & Trademark Office Commissioner letter response to Iviewit letter to John J. Doll. 2006 04 06 Institute of Professional Representatives before the European Patent Office letter to refile the Iviewit complaints and be more specific. 2006 04 19 Iviewit letter to The Honorable United States Senator Dianne Feinstein written at the direction of Harry I. Moatz who stated Iviewit would need congressional help on certain issues, like getting information on IP that was listed on the Iviewit IP dockets as Iviewit's but is not on file with the United States Patent & Trademark Office the same and where the USPTO cannot release information to Iviewit as the inventors are not listed on certain applications and the owners and assignees are not Iviewit. 2006 04 19 Iviewit letter to The Honorable United States Senator Dianne Feinstein written at the direction of Harry I. Moatz who stated Iviewit would need congressional help on certain issues, like getting information on IP that was listed on the Iviewit IP dockets as Iviewit's but is not on file with the United States Patent & Trademark Office the same and where the USPTO cannot release information to Iviewit as the inventors are not listed on certain applications and the owners and assignees are not Iviewit. 2006 06 16 Iviewit response to the Florida Department of Business and Professional Relations regarding their finding of no probably cause regarding Gerald Lewin, Erika Lewin and Goldstein Lewin & Co. sent to the Inspector General of the DBPR. 2006 07 25 Charlie Crist conflict with Foley & Lardner article, may provide answers as to how the Iviewit complaints were derailed in Florida. 2006 08 02 Institute of Professional Reperesentatives before the European Patent Office, Chris Mercer letter. 2006 08 14 Iviewit letter to Chris Mercer, President, Institute of Professional Representatives before the European Patent Office demanding investigation. 2006 08 19 US SUPREME COURT CASE 05-6611 Iviewit case docket. 2006 09 19 Institute of Professional Representative before the European Patent Office letter response to Iviewit letter of August 2, 2006. 2006 09 29 Iviewit to Nita Lowey US Congress. 2006 11 03 Stephen R. Kaye of Proskauer Rose and husband to Chief Judge of New York, Judith Kaye, death notice. Now have to sue estate for his involvement. Strange that Kaye becomes a partner in the IP department of Proskauer??? 2006 11 28 Representative Nita M. Lowey (D-NY 18th) letter to Iviewit that she was transferring the Iviewit case matters to incoming Chairman of the House Energy & Commerce Committee Representative John D. Dingell (D-MI 15th). Dingell then forwards the matters to The Honorable John Conyers Jr. (D-MI 14th) - Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee where the matters are under investigation. 2006 Kaye Proskauer Owns New York Article. 2006 Proskauer link to Valerie Plame issues. 2007 01 11 Iviewit Press Release regarding Representative John D. Dingell (D-MI 15th) sending the Iviewit matters to The Honorable John Conyers Jr. (D-MI 14th) - Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee where it sits in review. 2007 01 18 Iviewit letter to the House Judiciary Committee regarding the Iviewit matters forwarded by Chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee Representative John D. Dingell (D-MI 15th). 2007 01 19 Iviewit Press Release regarding Representative John D. Dingell (D-MI 15th) sending the Iviewit matters to The Honorable John Conyers Jr. (D-MI 14th) - Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee where it sits in review. Final. 2007 01 28 Lou Dobbs of CNN on Skull & Bones. It is interesting to note that Skull and Bones member Luce started Time which owns CNN. 2007 02 01 FINAL Iviewit request to The Honorable United States Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) for congressional aid in the Iviewit matters. 2007 02 01 List of ongoing and derailed investigations included in the petition for congressional aid for the Iviewit matters. 2007 02 05 Iviewit letter response to the European Patent Office letter tendered by Wim van der Eijk. 2007 04 05 President of the Institute of Professional Representatives before the European Patent Office, Chris Mercer letter response to Iviewit, this leads to learning that documents at the European Patent Office are fraudulent and have been changed in route to the EPO. 2007 04 09 Iviewit Response to EPO Letter FINAL. 2007 04 10 Wim van der Eijk letter from the European Patent Office in response to 2007 02 05 Iviewit letter. 2007 04 17 Iviewit Request for FBI IA and OIG investigation of FBI case. 2007 04 20 Iviewit request for the Federal Bureau of Investigations to launch an internal affairs probe into the missing case files of Iviewit, missing car bombing files regarding the bombing of inventor Bernstein's family minivan and the missing FBI investigator Stephen Lucchesi. 2007 06 11 EPO response from Wim van der Ejik regarding the documents sent by Chris Mercer, President of the Institute of Professional Representatives before the European Patent Office during his investigation which clearly show that documents were tampered with that were sent to the EPO for the patents. 2007 06 14 Iviewit request for the Federal Bureau of Investigations to launch an internal affairs probe into the missing case files of Iviewit, missing car bombing files regarding the bombing of inventor Bernstein's family minivan and the missing FBI investigator Stephen Lucchesi. FINAL 2007 06 18 Enron Broadband Exec Sentenced. 2007 06 28 Iviewit letter sent to Alain Pompidou, President of the European Patent Office c/o Aidan Kendrick and Wim van der Eijk, Principal Director of the European Patent Office regarding the fraudulent documents found in the investigation by the Institute of Professional Representatives before the European Patent Office. 2007 07 16 United States Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation Office of Professional Responsibility, H. Marshall Jarrett, Counsel begins review of the Iviewit matters regarding missing FBI case files for the Iviewit matters, the matters of the car bombing of inventor Bernstein's family minivan and the missing FBI investigator, Stephen Lucchesi. 2001 07 17 Iviewit Patent IP docket prepared by Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman showing patents were filed for Brian Utley by Foley & Lardner by Douglas Boehm and Steven Becker under the direction of William J. Dick and other problems. 2007 Denial of Due Process Exhibit. 2007 07 23 Iviewit New York State Commission of Investigation Complaint. 2007 07 30 NEWS ARTICLE - Jerusalem Post article showing how Proskauer aided Nazi cause and prevented boycott of Germany, allowing further mass destruction of human life. In Jewish lingo, Jews who aided and abetted Nazi's were deemed Judenrat. 2007 07 30 Jerusalem Post Proskauer Aided Nazi Cause. 2007 08 05 NEWS ARTICLE "Expose Corrupt Courts" article regarding Thomas J. Cahill of the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee involved in whitewashing complaints. 2007 08 08 Cahill problems in New York 1.xps 2007 08 09 and 19 State of New York Commission of Investigation letter from Anthony Cartusciello, Deputy Commissioner, denying investigation even though Thomas Cahill corruptions are being exposed at the First Department. 2007 08 09 2007 08 09 and 19 State of New York Commission of Investigation letter from Anthony Cartusciello, Deputy Commissioner, denying investigation even though Thomas Cahill corruptions are being exposed at the First Department. 2007 08 10 Enron Broadband Article Re Execs seeking dismissal. 2007 08 18 Iviewit letter to Andrew Cuomo regarding the uncovering of public office corruption of Thomas Cahill, Chief Counsel of the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee and to open immediate investigation of Cahill and the investigations of Proskauer Rose, Kenneth Rubenstein, Steven C. Krane, Raymond A. Joao, Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolf & Schlissel and others involved in the denial of due process of the Iviewit complaints. 2007 08 18 Iviewit letter to State of New York Commission of Investigation, Anthony Cartusciello, Deputy Commissioner, in rebuttal to his denying investigation in light of the unfolding ethics scandal at the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee and request to reconsider. 2007 08 27 The Nation - Gonzales Resigns. 2007 09 05 Iviewit letter to Eliot Spitzer as Governor of New York to begin immediate investigation in light of the unfolding ethics scandal at the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee and Thomas J. Cahill and request to reopen all Iviewit cases against members of the department and those involved in the theft of Iviewit Intellectual properties. 2007 09 24 New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo letter denying Iviewit investigation. 2007 10 08 Christine C. Anderson lawsuit Case No. 07 Civ. 9599 (SAS) Christine C. Anderson v. the State of New York, et al. in the United States District Court Southern District of New York under The Honorable Justice Shira A. Scheindlin. The filed complaint by Anderson who was an attorney for the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee who names Iviewit as part of her claims of the department "whitewashing" complaints, destroying case file information, physical assault for not following orders and other public office crimes. Anderson claims Thomas J. Cahill and others are involved. Cahill is the former Chief Counsel who resigned as the scandal began breaking who handled the Iviewit complaints and is currently under investigation by Martin Gold. 2007 10 31 New York Law Journal Exposes allegations of corruption at the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee regarding Thomas Cahill, former Chief Counsel, who resigns amist the unfolding scandal and the whistleblower lawsuit filed by former employee of the First Department Disciplinary Committee, Christine C. Anderson. Case No. 07 Civ. 9599 (SAS) Christine C. Anderson v. the State of New York, et al. in the United States District Court Southern District of New York under The Honorable Justice Shira A. Scheindlin. 2007 11 01 New York Times exposes allegations of corruption at the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee regarding Thomas Cahill, former Chief Counsel, who resigns amist the unfolding scandal and the whistleblower lawsuit filed by former employee of the First Department Disciplinary Committee, Christine C. Anderson. Case No. 07 Civ. 9599 (SAS) Christine C. Anderson v. the State of New York, et al. in the United States District Court Southern District of New York under The Honorable Justice Shira A. Scheindlin. 2007 11 22 Iviewit Press Release regarding the New York Law Journal and New York Times exposing allegations of corruption at the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee regarding Thomas Cahill, former Chief Counsel, who resigns amist the unfolding scandal and the whistleblower lawsuit filed by former employee of the First Department Disciplinary Committee, Christine C. Anderson. Case No. 07 Civ. 9599 (SAS) Christine C. Anderson v. the State of New York, et al. in the United States District Court Southern District of New York under The Honorable Justice Shira A. Scheindlin. 2007 12 11 Iviewit preliminary filing of 1.5 billion dollar lawsuit in the United States District Court Southern District of New York under The Honorable Justice Shira A. Scheindlin. The Iviewit case is in efforts to support former employee of the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department Disciplinary Committee, Christine C. Anderson's heroic efforts to expose corruption in the department. Case No. 07 Civ. 9599 (SAS) Christine C. Anderson v. the State of New York, et al. 2007 12 12 Iviewit filing of 1.5 billion dollar lawsuit in the United States District Court Southern District of New York under The Honorable Justice Shira A. Scheindlin. The Iviewit case, Docket No. # 07 Civ. 11196 (SAS) Eliot I. Bernstein, et al. v. Appellate Division First Department, Department Disciplinary Committee et al. is filed in effort to support former employee of the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department Disciplinary Committee, Christine C. Anderson's heroic efforts to expose corruption in the department. Case No. 07 Civ. 9599 (SAS) Christine C. Anderson v. the State of New York, et al. The filed amended complaint adds hundreds of defendants and claims damages over one trillion dollars, as the RICO element of the case forces the Iviewit patent crimes into the filing that began as support on disciplinary matters denying due process. 2007 12 21 Docket No. # 07 Civ. 11196 (SAS) Eliot I. Bernstein, et al. v. Appellate Division First Department, Department Disciplinary Committee et al. United States District Court Southern District of New York, Shira A. Scheindlin MOTION FOR: APPOINTMENT OF PRO BONO COUNSEL; EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT AFTER ORIGINAL COMPLAINT HAS BEEN FILED ON SOME OR ALL OF THE DEFENDANTS; ORDER FOR THE UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE TO SERVE PAPERS ON REMAINING OR ALL OF THE DEFENDANTS; ACCEPT LIMITED POWER OF ATTORNEY OF PLANTIFF BERNSTEIN AND PLANTIFF LAMONT; ACCEPT REMOTE APPEARANCE OF PLAINTIFF BERNSTEIN FOR COURT PROCEEDINGS; AND PHYSICAL PROTECTION OF PLAINTIFFS FOR COURT APPEARANCES. 2008 01 09 Court Order United States District Court, Southern District of New York NY case 07CV 11196 SAS. 2008 01 15 Iviewit Press from Yonkers Tribune on UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK filing. 2008 01 23 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Memo to US Marshal re Extra Copies. 2008 01 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Notice to Serve Courtesy Copies on Attorney General. 2008 02 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Letter re missing service papers. 2008 03 03 USPTO Non Recordation Sheet of Assignment. 2008 03 05 Final Plaintiff Opposition to AG Cuomo letter email copy. 2008 03 05 Final Plaintiff Opposition to Proskauer letter as counsel. 2008 03 07 Scheindlin Order re conflicts. 2008 03 10 Scheindlin Order re conflicts. 2008 03 13 FINAL Plaintiff Response to Scheindlin March 07 2008 Order. 2008 03 14 FINAL Letter to NY AG to reopen investigation on new evidence. 2008 03 20 Memo of Law in Support of TFB Motion to Dismiss Greenberg Traurig. 2008 03 20 Notice of Motion for Florida Bar et al filed Greenberg Traurig. 2008 03 21 Order Scheindlin. 2008 03 28 Notice of Appearance Friedman for Foley. 2008 03 28 Scheindlin Order re Foley counsel. 2008 04 01 Motion in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss for Florida Bar et al filed Greenberg Traurig. 2008 04 06 FINAL FILED Motion for Allow Filing of an Amended Complaint1. 2008 04 07 FILED FINAL Motion in Opposition to Florida Bar. 2008 04 08 US Department of Justice Refuse to Investigate Letter. 2008 04 11 Iviewit Response to FBI OPR letter signed sent and printed copy. 2008 04 15 FINAL SENT TO COURT and Letter to Virginia Bar Counsel Attorney General Hall re phone conv.doc 2008 04 21 FINAL SIGNED Motion for Pro Bono Counsel low. 2008 04 23 Connell Motion for VA AG Pro Hac Vice. 2008 05 02 Foley Anker Appearance and letter re conflicts. 2008 05 02 Foley Anker to Bernstein to stop contacting Foley. 2008 05 09 FINAL AMENDED COMPLAINT AND RICO SIGNED COPY HIGH.doc 2008 05 09 FINAL AMENDED COMPLAINT AND RICO SIGNED COPY LOW.doc 2008 05 09 FINAL AMENDED COMPLAINT AND RICO SIGNED COPY MED.doc 2008 05 09 FINAL MOTION FOR PRO SE DESK TO COPY AMENDED COMPLAINT.doc 2008 05 09 Proskauer to Scheindlin to block amended. 2008 05 09 Scheindlin Order to stay amended. 2008 05 13 Proskauer Request for Amended Complaint. 2008 05 13 Request for Clarification on Order dated May 9th 2008. 2008 05 13 Scheindlin Order Denying Pro Se Copying. 2008 05 15 FINAL Motion in Opposition to Order. 60 233 341 - 57103-123 - Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman Utley Stolen Patents. 60 233 341 - 57103-123 Utley Theft. 60 233 344 - 57103-122 - BLAKELY SOKOLOFF TAYLOR & ZAFMAN Copy Utley Theft 2. 60 233 344 - Utley Zoom and Pan Camera Filing. 872 99 99 air d&o insurance policy face page Anthony Boggs Message Regarding Kelly Overstreet Johnson Cannot Accept Files - After it was discovered that she had conflicts of interest with Wheeler brother - Windows Media File Armstrong Hersh Documents Part 2. ARTHUR ANDERSEN FILES Bankruptcy documentation of Intel/RYJO Utley Reale Hersh they file on companies they have no contracts with and get caught. At the time we did not know these were mirror companies of the shareholder companies with stolen patents. We thought they filed on the wrong companies and were idiots. It was not until the patent office told us that patents were in some of these companies that we learned that Proskauer had fraudulently set up corporations that mirrored companies and had second set of stolen patents going into them. This action was filed without company knowledge and the company found out from AOLTW/WB that this action existed. Barroway Bar Complaint Final. Barroway Breach Issues.doc Blakely Letter to USPTO removing Utley from patents never happened. Blakely patent portfolio versus Foley and Meltzer. BSTZ Japanese Filings Portfolio. BSTZ Japanese Filing of Utley Patent after he is gone. bush-kerry-yale. conspiracies.htm Crossbow Ventures and on Behalf of the SBA files charges of Fraud On the United States Patent & Trademark Office with Iviewit. Depositions (Eliot Bernstein, Simon Bernstein, Kenneth Rubenstein, Christopher Wheeler, Gerald Lewin, William Kasser, Brian Utley) SEARCHABLE with hyperlink comments Dick Involvement with Utley at Diamond Turf Equipment, Inc. and Virginia Bar Statement. Dick Statement Contradict Utley on Filing Patent. Eliot Timeline of email 98-99.tif Ellen DeGeneres Video Netfomercial Regarding Iviewit EPO fraud filing. Erika Lewin notes on corporate structure to Ernst Young Completely false and misleading. Exhibit B - Tiedemann Prolow Loan Documents. Exhibit B2 Utley Employment Agreement and Non Compete. Exhibit I Lewin COI and Wheeler. Flaster withdraw as counsel. Florida supreme court case docket sc04-1078. Foley Lardner Patent Portfolio submitted to the Virginia Bar. When this was sent to Harry Moatz at the United States Patent Office it was found to contain false and misleading information regarding certain patent applications. FREE PRESS INTERNATIONAL Bush and Kerry both admit to being members of Skull and Bones.htm Gail Prudenti Judith kayo conflict. grebe1. grebe2. grebe3. grebe4. Holy Grail Articles I-Newswire Press Release on Data Compression Article. Investigations Master Sheet Showing Denial of Due Process and Procedure for derailed investigations.htm Investor Presentation v2.ppt Iviewit / Cyberfyds Early Site Iviewit Master Attorney Document. Iviewit Press Release Sachin Garg Eworld. Iviewit Press Release. Iviewit Stock Certs. JOAO and Utley PATENTS.doc Joao at Dreier Baritz Law Firm. Joao at Dugan and Dugan PC. Joao destroying documents. Joao distance learning patent. JOAO FIRST BILLING MISSING FEBRUARY FILING WHICH HE HAS RECEIPT FOR< WHERE DID IT GO?. Joao Inventions 2.MDI Joao Inventions List. Jiao patents 2.mdi Jiao patents. Joao was told of bad claims prior to filing by Utley. Joao's biggest client himself article. Johnson receipt of Triggs complaint. Kasser Corporate Books. Kaye Article Proskauer In Firm kayo Prudenti accepts awards for her. kayo Prudenti on board together. kayo Prudenti problems in other case. Krane bio 2 Krane President of NY Bar Rubenstein. Krane Proskauer Bio. Krane Suicide Letter Tendered in Conflict and Violation of Public Office in Response to Complaint against him and Proskauer Letter to Jackie Selebi President of Interpol. Letter to the Honorable Senator Dianne Feinstein D California Signed. Lewin Deposition Fingering Rubenstein Lewin Deposition on Memory page 666 LEWIN video list of bar actions and others List of Patent Suspensions List of State Federal and other crimes Lucchesi letter re Interpol. Mark Gaffney Supporting Documents.htm Matthew Triggs of Proskauer represents Wheeler while in blackout period of his Supreme Court of Florida Bar position in conflict of interest and violation of public office. missing inventors Jiao and foley. missing inventors Jiao patents told to wheeler and Foley 1.wav missing inventors Jiao patents told to wheeler and Foley 2.wav Motion for Mistrial Version 4_Final. Motion for Rubenstein and Wheeler to resume depositions. Narine Bar Complaint Final. NDA - Goldman Sachs - Jeffrey Friedstein. NDA Infringers. node violators New York State Bar Represented by Proskauer Rose making whole bar disciplinary system conflicted. News Crossbow Iviewit Investment 1500000 News Crossbow Iviewit Investment 1500000 New York Bar Association STRIKE RUBENSTEIN RESPONSE - COMPLAINT AGAINST KRANE. office of solicitor general. Officers Directors Professionals Summary Version 2.doc Outline of Crimes Patent Pool Infringers patentforfraud.htm press Ellen DeGeneres full story. Proskauer Bills - Summary General Ledger. Proskauer Client Infringers Proskauer Intellectual Property Billings Rubenstein Proskauer Patent Bills. Proskauer plume Wilson lawsuit. Proskauer Rose v. Iviewit - Pleadings 1 2001 05 to 2002 08 PROSKAUER RUBENSTEIN PATENT POOLS Proskauer Technology Department 2. Proskauer v Iviewit CA 01 04671 AB Proskauer v Iviewit CA 01 04671 AB. Proskauer Wheeler Business Plan Bills Proskauer Wheeler Patent Copyright and related bills Prudenti Proskauer conflicts. Real 3D and Huizenga info. Real 3D Opinion and Licensing Info. Response to AICPA Final Executed. Response_to_Garcia_Stallone_Version_1. RICO CRIME CHARTS Rubenstein as counsel 2. Rubenstein Deposition I know nothing. Rubenstein Joao Utley Filipek Meeting NY Rubenstein Office. RYJO LETTER WARNING OF USING IVIEWIT TECH INTEL HERSH. RYJO/INTEL claim Iviewit technologies as their own and seek intellectual properties on iviewit technology while under node SBA Loan Due Diligence Utley Sends info with Rubenstein as Board Member. Selz message on Rubenstein and Proskauer wheeler. SHAREHOLDER STATEMENTS BOOKMARKED Shareholders Shareholders skull 10.MDI Skull 7 Bush Plame. skull 8.MDI skull 9.MDI skull1. skull2. skull3 cobs news. skull4.MDI skull4. skull5. skull6.MDI Stephen Selz, Esq.. message on Rubenstein and wheeler documents showing the opposite of their statements to courts and bars STOCK CERT HUIZENGA CANCELLED. Stock Certs for Iviewit Technologies, Inc. Summary of Damages Tech Dirt Iviewit News. The Fight for the Grail TRADEMARK ASSIGNMENTS AND LISTS. USPTO cannot give information on Utley patent1. USPTO CFR 37 CONSOLIDATED RULES USPTO correspondence two. USPTO USC Title 35 Patent Laws Utley Background Lies Exposed During His Deposition forgot to put on resume Proskauer Wheeler tendered that Foley's Dick, Wheeler and himself were found stealing patents at his last job Utley Deposition Dick Never Filed Patent at Diamond Turf contradicts Dick's statement to Virginia Bar that he did. Utley Deposition PATENT PROBLEMS Diamond Turf 1. Utley Deposition PATENT PROBLEMS Diamond Turf. Utley Deposition Wheeler Knew About Diamond Turf 2. Utley Deposition Wheeler Knew About Diamond Turf. Utley Deposition Wheeler Never Represented Me - Wheeler contradicts this in his deposition saying he represented Utley. Utley Deposition camera application. UTLEY DEPOSITION DIAMOND TURF PATENT PROBLEMS. Utley Deposition NO COLLEGE CLEAN. Utley Deposition Patents All Assigned to Iviewit. Utley Deposition Rubenstein Not An Advisor. Utley Dick Attorney at DIAMOND TURF EQUIPMENT, INC.. Utley Patent Dispute at DIAMOND TURF EQUIPMENT, INC. Utley Resume - Perfect Copy. Utley Statement for Dick Foley Virginia Bar Response. Utley stolen patent samples Utley to Joao Major Missing Items in patent - clean copy. Virginia Bar bar. Virginia Bar fl bar correspondences Williams turner. Weisberg and Selz orders from Schiffrin Barroway. Wheeler Articles FAU Scandal & Fuzion Fraud. Wheeler Deposition Iviewit Portal not Inventions. Wheeler Deposition I represented Utley. Wheeler Deposition Regarding Conflicts Check. Wheeler deposition stating NO PATENT OPINION. Wheeler Guilty of Felony DUI with Injury. Wheeler supplement to deposition. Wheeler/Proskauer marketing letter with client list, show's that Wheeler, Rubenstein and Proskauer knew far more about the technology than they now claim Zakirul on feasibility study. Zakirul on Jiao having switch and signing patents. Zakirul testimony on Jiao meeting wheeler4.wav Zakirul testimony on Rubenstein Jiao meeting wheeler. Zakirul testimony on Rubenstein Jiao meeting wheeler. Zakirul testimony on Rubenstein Jiao meeting wheeler2.wav Zakirul testimony on Rubenstein Jiao meeting wheeler2.wav Zakirul testimony on signing patents. Zakirul testimony on signing patents2.wav ZAKIRUL SHIRAJEE SWORN STATEMENT. Zakirul Shirajee testimony on Rubenstein Joao patent disclosure meetings at Wheeler's Proskauer office Zakirul Shirajee testimony Zakirul Shirajee testimony 851 2000 06 14 Proskauer Rose Generated Business Plan Iviewit with Rubenstein as Advisor Legal Counsel 1999 06 09 Proskauer Investigating Lewin, CPA Document and Lewin Conflict Letter re Visual Data 1999 06 14 Proskauer Kept Confidentiality Agreements 2000 08 26 Iviewit Business Plan Generated by Utley with Rubenstein as Advisor to Board Contradicting all Deposition of Rubenstein Utley and Wheeler 2000 06 09 Document Service International License Agreement. 2000 06 20 Goldman Sachs receiving Patents as Investment Banker for Iviewit 1999 04 26 Goldstein Lewin Financial Projections Iviewit 00938124.5Complete file. 00938126.0Complete file. 00942690.9Complete file. 00955352.0Complete file. 00944619.6Complete file. 2007 07 16 US Department of Justice Letter stating they are beginning review of the Iviewit matters

U.S. District Court United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Foley Square) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:07-cv-11196-SAS Bernstein et al v. Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee et al Assigned to: Judge Shira A. Scheindlin Demand: $9,999,000 Related Case: 1:07-cv-09599-SAS Cause: 18:1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act Date Filed: 12/12/2007 Jury Demand: Plaintiff Nature of Suit: 470 Racketeer/Corrupt Organization Jurisdiction: Federal Question Plaintiff Eliot I. Bernstein Individually represented by Eliot I. Bernstein PRO SE Plaintiff Eliot I. Bernstein represented by Eliot I. Bernstein (See above for address) PRO SE Plaintiff P. Stephen Lamont on behalf of Shareholders of Iviewit Holdings, Inc., Iviewit Technologies, Inc., Uview.com, Inc., Iviewit.com, Inc., I.C., Inc., Iviewit.com LLC, Iviewit LLC, Iviewit Corporation, Iviewit, Inc., and Patent Interest Holders represented by P. Stephen Lamont PRO SE V. Defendant Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee Defendant Thomas J. Cahill in his official capacity Defendant Thomas J. Cahill in his individual capacity Defendant Joseph Wigley in his official capacity Defendant Joseph Wigley in his individual capacity Defendant Catherine O'Hagen Wolfe in their official capacity Defendant Catherine O'Hagen Wolfe in their individual capacity Defendant Paul Curran in their official capacity Defendant Paul Curran in individual capacity Defendant Martin R. Gold in his individual capacity Defendant Martin R. Gold in their official capacity Defendant Hon. Angela M. Mazzarelli in her official capacity Defendant Angela M. Mazzarelli in her individual capacity Defendant Hon. Richard T. Andrias in his official capacity Defendant Richard T. Andrias in his individual capacity Defendant Hon. David B. Saxe in his official capacity Defendant David B. Saxe in his individual capacity Defendant Hon. David Friedman in his official capacity Defendant David Friedman in his individual capacity Defendant Hon. Luiz A. Gonzales in his official capacity Defendant Luiz A. Gonzales in his individual capacity Defendant Appellate Division Second Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee Defendant Lawrence DiGiovanna in his official capacity Defendant Lawrence DiGiovanna in his individual capacity Defendant Diana Maxfield Kearse in her official capacity Defendant Diana Maxfield Kearse in her individual capacity Defendant James E. Peltzer in his official capacity Defendant James E. Peltzer in his individual capacity Defendant Hon. A. Gail Prudenti in her official capacity Defendant A. Gail Prudenti in her individual capacity Defendant Steven C. Krane in his official capacity Defendant Steven C. Krane in his individual capacity Defendant Hon. Judith S. Kaye in her official capacity Defendant Judith S. Kaye in her individual capacity Defendant Kenneth Rubenstein Defendant Estate of Stephen Kaye Defendant Proskauer Rose LLP Defendant Meltzer Lippe Goldstein & Breistone LLP Defendant Lewis S. Meltzer Defendant Raymond A. Joao Defendant Foley Lardner LLP Defendant Michael C. Grebe Defendant William J. Dick Defendant Douglas A. Boehm Defendant Steven C. Becker Defendant State of New York Commission of Investigation Defendant Lawyers Fund for Client Protection of the State of New York Defendant The Florida Bar Defendant Lorraine Christine Hoffman in her official capacity Defendant Lorraine Christine Hoffman in her individual capacity Defendant Eric Turner in his official capacity Defendant Eric Turner in his individual capacity Defendant John Anthony Boggs in his official capacity Defendant John Anthony Boggs in his individual capacity Defendant Kenneth Marvin in his official capacity Defendant Kenneth Marvin in his individual capacity Defendant Thomas Hall in his official capacity Defendant Thomas Hall in his individual capacity Defendant Debroah Yarborough in her official capacity Defendant Debroah Yarborough in her individual capacity Defendant Virginia State Bar Defendant Andrew H. Goodman in his official capacity Defendant Andrew H. Goodman in his individual capacity Defendant Noel Sengel in her official capacity Defendant Noel Sengel in her individual capacity Defendant Mary W. Martelino in her individual capacity Defendant John Does Date Filed # Docket Text 12/12/2007 1 COMPLAINT against Catherine O'Hagen Wolfe (in their individual capacity), Paul Curran (in their official capacity), Paul Curran (in individual capacity), Martin R. Gold (in his individual capacity), Martin R. Gold (in their official capacity), Angela M. Mazzarelli (in her official capacity), Angela M. Mazzarelli (in her individual capacity), Richard T. Andrias (in his official capacity), Richard T. Andrias (in his individual capacity), David B. Saxe, David B. Saxe, David Friedman (in his official capacity), David Friedman (in his individual capacity), Luiz A. Gonzales (in his official capacity), Luiz A. Gonzales (in his individual capacity), Appellate Division Second Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee, Lawrence DiGiovanna (in his official capacity), Lawrence DiGiovanna (in his individual capacity), Diana Maxfield Kearse (in her official capacity), Diana Maxfield Kearse (in her individual capacity), James E. Peltzer (in his official capacity), James E. Peltzer (in his individual capacity), A. Gail Prudenti (in her official capacity), A. Gail Prudenti (in her individual capacity), Steven C. Krane (in his official capacity), Steven C. Krane (in his individual capacity), Judith S. Kaye, Judith S. Kaye, Kenneth Rubenstein, Estate of Stephen Kaye, Proskauer Rose LLP, Meltzer Lippe Goldstein & Breistone LLP, Lewis S. Meltzer, Raymond A. Joao, Foley Lardner LLP, Michael C. Grebe, William J. Dick, Douglas A. Boehm, Steven C. Becker, State of New York Commission of Investigation, Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee, Lawyers Fund for Client Protection of the State of New York, The Florida Bar, Lorraine Christine Hoffman (in her official capacity), Lorraine Christine Hoffman (in her individual capacity), Eric Turner (in his official capacity), Eric Turner (in his individual capacity), John Anthony Boggs (in his official capacity), John Anthony Boggs (in his individual capacity), Kenneth Marvin (in his official capacity), Kenneth Marvin (in his individual capacity), Thomas J. Cahill (in his official capacity), Thomas Hall (in his official capacity), Thomas Hall (in his individual capacity), Debroah Yarborough (in her official capacity), Debroah Yarborough (in her individual capacity), Virginia State Bar, Andrew H. Goodman (in his official capacity), Andrew H. Goodman (in his individual capacity), Noel Sengel (in her official capacity), Noel Sengel (in her individual capacity), Mary W. Martelino, Thomas J. Cahill (in his individual capacity), John Does, Joseph Wigley (in his official capacity), Joseph Wigley (in his individual capacity), Catherine O'Hagen Wolfe (in their official capacity). (Filing Fee $ 350.00, Receipt Number 635712)Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually), Eliot I. Bernstein, P. Stephen Lamont.(mbe) (Entered: 12/14/2007) 12/12/2007 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Catherine O'Hagen Wolfe (in their individual capacity), Paul Curran (in their official capacity), Paul Curran (in individual capacity), Martin R. Gold (in his individual capacity), Martin R. Gold (in their official capacity), Angela M. Mazzarelli (in her official capacity), Angela M. Mazzarelli (in her individual capacity), Richard T. Andrias (in his official capacity), Richard T. Andrias (in his individual capacity), David B. Saxe, David B. Saxe, David Friedman (in his official capacity), David Friedman (in his individual capacity), Luiz A. Gonzales (in his official capacity), Luiz A. Gonzales (in his individual capacity), Appellate Division Second Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee, Lawrence DiGiovanna (in his official capacity), Lawrence DiGiovanna (in his individual capacity), Diana Maxfield Kearse (in her official capacity), Diana Maxfield Kearse (in her individual capacity), James E. Peltzer (in his official capacity), James E. Peltzer (in his individual capacity), A. Gail Prudenti (in her official capacity), A. Gail Prudenti (in her individual capacity), Steven C. Krane (in his official capacity), Steven C. Krane (in his individual capacity), Judith S. Kaye, Judith S. Kaye, Kenneth Rubenstein, Estate of Stephen Kaye, Proskauer Rose LLP, Meltzer Lippe Goldstein & Breistone LLP, Lewis S. Meltzer, Raymond A. Joao, Foley Lardner LLP, Michael C. Grebe, William J. Dick, Douglas A. Boehm, Steven C. Becker, State of New York Commission of Investigation, Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee, Lawyers Fund for Client Protection of the State of New York, The Florida Bar, Lorraine Christine Hoffman (in her official capacity), Lorraine Christine Hoffman (in her individual capacity), Eric Turner (in his official capacity), Eric Turner (in his individual capacity), John Anthony Boggs (in his official capacity), John Anthony Boggs (in his individual capacity), Kenneth Marvin (in his official capacity), Kenneth Marvin (in his individual capacity), Thomas J. Cahill (in his official capacity), Thomas Hall (in his official capacity), Thomas Hall (in his individual capacity), Debroah Yarborough (in her official capacity), Debroah Yarborough (in her individual capacity), Virginia State Bar, Andrew H. Goodman (in his official capacity), Andrew H. Goodman (in his individual capacity), Noel Sengel (in her official capacity), Noel Sengel (in her individual capacity), Mary W. Martelino, Thomas J. Cahill (in his individual capacity), John Does, Joseph Wigley (in his official capacity), Joseph Wigley (in his individual capacity), Catherine O'Hagen Wolfe (in their official capacity). (mbe) (Entered: 12/14/2007) 12/12/2007 CASE REFERRED TO Judge Shira A. Scheindlin as possibly related to 1:07-cv-9599. (mbe) (Entered: 12/14/2007) 12/21/2007 CASE ACCEPTED AS RELATED. Create association to 1:07-cv-09599-SAS. Notice of Assignment to follow. (laq) (Entered: 01/10/2008) 12/21/2007 4 NOTICE OF CASE ASSIGNMENT to Judge Shira A. Scheindlin. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (laq) (Entered: 01/10/2008) 12/21/2007 Magistrate Judge Douglas F. Eaton is so designated. (laq) (Entered: 01/10/2008) 12/26/2007 2 MOTION for appointment of pro bono counsel; MOTION for Extension of Time to file amended complaint after original complaint has been filed on some or all of the defendants; MOTION for order for the United States Marshal Service to serve papers on remaining or all of the defendants; MOTION to accept limited power of attorney of plaintiff Bernstein and Plaintiff Lamont Accept Remote appearance of plaintiff Bernstein for Court Proceedings; and Physical Protection of Plaintiffs for Court Appearances. Attached is Affidavit in Support. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually), Eliot I. Bernstein. (djc) (Entered: 01/08/2008) 12/26/2007 3 DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually). (djc) (Entered: 01/09/2008) 1/10/2008 Mailed notice to the attorney(s) of record. (laq) (Entered: 01/10/2008) 1/10/2008 5 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 2 Motion to Appoint Counsel ; granting in part and denying in part 2 Motion for Extension of Time; granting in part and denying in part 2 Motion to Serve; granting in part and denying in part 2 Motion. For the reasons stated above, plaintiffs' motions are granted in part and denied in part. The United States Marshals are directed to serve the Complaint on defendants. Plaintiffs will have until twenty days after service is completed on all defendants to file an amended complaint. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close these motions (document no. 2 on the docket sheet). (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 1/9/2008)(jmi) (Entered: 01/11/2008) 1/23/2008 AMENDED SUMMONS ISSUED as to Catherine O'Hagen Wolfe (in their individual capacity), Paul Curran (in their official capacity), Paul Curran (in individual capacity), Martin R. Gold (in his individual capacity), Martin R. Gold (in their official capacity), Angela M. Mazzarelli (in her official capacity), Angela M. Mazzarelli (in her individual capacity), Richard T. Andrias (in his official capacity), Richard T. Andrias (in his individual capacity), David B. Saxe, David B. Saxe, David Friedman (in his official capacity), David Friedman (in his individual capacity), Luiz A. Gonzales (in his official capacity), Luiz A. Gonzales (in his individual capacity), Appellate Division Second Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee, Lawrence DiGiovanna (in his official capacity), Lawrence DiGiovanna (in his individual capacity), Diana Maxfield Kearse (in her official capacity), Diana Maxfield Kearse (in her individual capacity), James E. Peltzer (in his official capacity), James E. Peltzer (in his individual capacity), A. Gail Prudenti (in her official capacity), A. Gail Prudenti (in her individual capacity), Steven C. Krane (in his official capacity), Steven C. Krane (in his individual capacity), Judith S. Kaye, Judith S. Kaye, Kenneth Rubenstein, Estate of Stephen Kaye, Proskauer Rose LLP, Meltzer Lippe Goldstein & Breistone LLP, Lewis S. Meltzer, Raymond A. Joao, Foley Lardner LLP, Michael C. Grebe, William J. Dick, Douglas A. Boehm, Steven C. Becker, State of New York Commission of Investigation, Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee, Lawyers Fund for Client Protection of the State of New York, The Florida Bar, Lorraine Christine Hoffman (in her official capacity), Lorraine Christine Hoffman (in her individual capacity), Eric Turner (in his official capacity), Eric Turner (in his individual capacity), John Anthony Boggs (in his official capacity), John Anthony Boggs (in his individual capacity), Kenneth Marvin (in his official capacity), Kenneth Marvin (in his individual capacity), Thomas J. Cahill (in his official capacity), Thomas Hall (in his official capacity), Thomas Hall (in his individual capacity), Debroah Yarborough (in her official capacity), Debroah Yarborough (in her individual capacity), Virginia State Bar, Andrew H. Goodman (in his official capacity), Andrew H. Goodman (in his individual capacity), Noel Sengel (in her official capacity), Noel Sengel (in her individual capacity), Mary W. Martelino, Thomas J. Cahill (in his individual capacity), John Does, Joseph Wigley (in his official capacity), Joseph Wigley (in his individual capacity), Catherine O'Hagen Wolfe (in their official capacity). (tro) (Entered: 01/25/2008) 3/7/2008 6 MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. David B. Saxe served on 2/28/2008, answer due 3/19/2008; David B. Saxe served on 2/28/2008, answer due 3/19/2008. Service was accepted by David B. Saxe. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein. (dle) (Entered: 03/10/2008) 3/10/2008 7 ORDER: I have considered plaintiffs' request and have determined that the Attorney General does not face an improper conflict of interest in representing the State Defendants. If, however, the Attorney General concludes that an investigation of defendants is warranted, then independent counsel would be required. Plaintiffs request that the Court find that defendant Raymond A. Joao's counsel, alleged to be John W. Fried is conflicted because Fried will be required to testify and may be added as a defendant. Plaintiffs' request is denied at this time. Plaintiff also request that the Court reconsider its earlier denial of plaintiffs' request for pro bono counsel. Plaintiffs have presented no such decisions or factual matters. The Request is denied. Defendants time to return waivers of personal service is hereby extended until March 21, 2008. Defendants shall move or answer no later than May 30, 2008. (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 3/7/2008) (jpo) (Entered: 03/10/2008) 3/11/2008 8 MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Martin R. Gold (in his individual capacity) served on 2/29/2008, answer due 3/20/2008; Martin R. Gold (in their official capacity) served on 2/29/2008, answer due 3/20/2008. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein. (jmi) (Entered: 03/14/2008) 3/14/2008 9 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE. John Anthony Boggs (in his official capacity) served on 3/4/2008, answer due 3/24/2008. Service was accepted by John Anthony Boggs. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein. (djc) (Entered: 03/17/2008) 3/19/2008 10 MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE UNEXECUTED as to Debroah Yarborough (in her official capacity). Attempted Service of Summons and Complaint. Service was attempted on 3/12/08. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually), Eliot I. Bernstein. (pl) (Entered: 03/20/2008) 3/21/2008 11 ORDER: plaintiffs are again reminded that pursuant to Standing Order M10-468, all communications with the Court, including all motions and letters are to be directed to the Court's Pro Se Office, not to chambers. Violation of the Standing Order may lead to a finding of contempt of court. Plaintiffs have requested reconsideration of the Court's Order dated March 7, 2008. The Court declines to revisit its earlier decision. Plaintiffs have also requested legal advice on several topics. The Court does not give legal advice to parties. Plaintiffs have requested legal advice on several topics. The Court does not give legal advice to parties. Plaintiffs have requested that the Court notify the appropriate authorities of defendants' alleged criminal misconduct. At this early stage of the litigation, such notification would be both inappropriate and premature. Finally, plaintiffs have requested permission to make use of the Court's electronic case filing and case management system. At this time, permission to do so is denied. Any further consideration of the substantive issues raised by plaintiffs, including plaintiffs' requests regarding conflicts of interest, must await the resolution of anticipated motions to dismiss. (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 3/21/08) (tro) (Entered: 03/21/2008) 3/21/2008 12 MOTION to Dismiss pursuant to F. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(2) and (6). (Attached is the Declaration of Glenn T. Burhans, Jr., in Support of The Florida Bar Defendants' Motion to Dismiss.) Document filed by The Florida Bar, Lorraine Christine Hoffman (in her individual capacity), Eric Turner (in his official capacity), John Anthony Boggs (in his official capacity), Kenneth Marvin (in his official capacity). (rw) (Entered: 03/24/2008) 3/21/2008 13 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support of the Florida Bar Defendants' Motion to dismiss the Complaint pursuant to F.R.C.P. 12(b)and (6). Document filed by The Florida Bar, Lorraine Christine Hoffman (in her official capacity), Eric Turner (in his official capacity), John Anthony Boggs (in his official capacity), Kenneth Marvin (in his individual capacity). (jpo) (Entered: 03/24/2008) 3/24/2008 14 ORDER all defendants that seek to move to dismiss must so move and submit memoranda of law no later than May 30, 2008. Plaintiffs' response is due on June 30, 2008. Defendants' reply, if any, is due on July 14, 2008. The parties are reminded that the restrictions on page limits and exhibits detailed in the Court's Individual Rules and Procedures are in effect, and memoranda of law that do not comply with these Rules will be rejected. SO ORDERED. (Responses due by 6/30/2008, Replies due by 7/14/2008.) (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 3/24/2008) (jmi) (Entered: 03/25/2008) 3/24/2008 15 MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Proskauer Rose LLP served on 3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008. Service was accepted by Greg Mashberg. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein. (dle) (Entered: 03/25/2008) 3/24/2008 16 MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Kenneth Rubenstein served on 3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008. Service was accepted by Greg Mashberg. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein. (dle) (Entered: 03/25/2008) 3/24/2008 17 MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Steven C. Krane (in his official capacity) served on 3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008; Steven C. Krane (in his individual capacity) served on 3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008. Service was accepted by Gregg Mashberg. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein. (dle) (Entered: 03/25/2008) 3/24/2008 18 MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Estate of Stephen Kaye served on 3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008. Service was accepted by Gregg Mashberg. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein. (dle) (Entered: 03/25/2008) 3/24/2008 20 MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Mary W. Martelino served on 3/14/2008, answer due 4/3/2008. Service was accepted by Stephen Hall. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein. (dle) (Entered: 03/25/2008) 3/24/2008 21 MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Virginia State Bar served on 3/14/2008, answer due 4/3/2008. Service was accepted by Stephen Hall. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein. (dle) (Entered: 03/25/2008) 3/24/2008 22 MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Noel Sengel (in her official capacity) served on 3/14/2008, answer due 4/3/2008; Noel Sengel (in her individual capacity) served on 3/14/2008, answer due 4/3/2008. Service was accepted by Stephen Hall. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein. (dle) (Entered: 03/25/2008) 3/24/2008 23 MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Andrew H. Goodman (in his official capacity) served on 3/14/2008, answer due 4/3/2008; Andrew H. Goodman (in his individual capacity) served on 3/14/2008, answer due 4/3/2008. Service was accepted by Stephen Hall. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein. (dle) (Entered: 03/25/2008) 3/25/2008 19 FILING ERROR - ELECTRONIC FILING IN NON-ECF CASE - NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by John Walter Fried on behalf of Raymond A. Joao (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit of Service)(Fried, John) Modified on 3/26/2008 (db). (Entered: 03/25/2008) 3/25/2008 24 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Monica Anne Connell on behalf of Catherine O'Hagen Wolfe (in their individual capacity), Paul Curran (in their official capacity), Paul Curran (in individual capacity), Martin R. Gold (in his individual capacity), Martin R. Gold (in their official capacity), Angela M. Mazzarelli (in her official capacity), Angela M. Mazzarelli (in her individual capacity), Richard T. Andrias (in his official capacity), Richard T. Andrias (in his individual capacity), David B. Saxe, David B. Saxe, David Friedman (in his official capacity), David Friedman (in his individual capacity), Luiz A. Gonzales (in his official capacity), Luiz A. Gonzales (in his individual capacity), Appellate Division Second Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee, Lawrence DiGiovanna (in his official capacity), Lawrence DiGiovanna (in his individual capacity), Diana Maxfield Kearse (in her official capacity), Diana Maxfield Kearse (in her individual capacity), James E. Peltzer (in his official capacity), James E. Peltzer (in his individual capacity), A. Gail Prudenti (in her official capacity), A. Gail Prudenti (in her individual capacity), Judith S. Kaye, Judith S. Kaye, State of New York Commission of Investigation, Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee, Lawyers Fund for Client Protection of the State of New York, Thomas J. Cahill (in his official capacity), Thomas J. Cahill (in his individual capacity), Joseph Wigley (in his official capacity), Joseph Wigley (in his individual capacity), Catherine O'Hagen Wolfe (in their official capacity) (dle) (Entered: 03/26/2008) 3/26/2008 ***NOTE TO ATTORNEY TO RE-FILE DOCUMENT - NON-ECF CASE ERROR. Note to Attorney John Walter Fried to MANUALLY RE-FILE Document Notice of Appearance, Document No. 19. This case is not ECF. (db) (Entered: 03/26/2008) 3/26/2008 25 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by John Walter Fried on behalf of Raymond A. Joao. (jco) (Entered: 03/27/2008) 3/27/2008 26 MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Michael C. Grebe served on 3/16/2008, answer due 5/30/2008. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein; P. Stephen Lamont. (pl) (Entered: 03/31/2008) 3/27/2008 27 MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Lorraine Christine Hoffman (in her official capacity) served on 3/5/2008, answer due 3/25/2008. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein; P. Stephen Lamont. (pl) (Entered: 03/31/2008) 3/27/2008 28 MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Judith S. Kaye served on 3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein; P. Stephen Lamont. (pl) (Entered: 03/31/2008) 3/27/2008 29 MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Lawyers Fund for Client Protection of the State of New York served on 3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein; P. Stephen Lamont. (pl) (Entered: 03/31/2008) 3/27/2008 30 MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. State of New York Commission of Investigation served on 3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein; P. Stephen Lamont. (pl) (Entered: 03/31/2008) 3/27/2008 31 MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Paul Curran (in individual capacity) served on 3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein; P. Stephen Lamont. (pl) (Entered: 03/31/2008) 3/27/2008 32 MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Angela M. Mazzarelli (in her official capacity) served on 3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein; P. Stephen Lamont. (pl) (Entered: 03/31/2008) 3/27/2008 33 MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. James E. Peltzer (in his official capacity) served on 3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein; P. Stephen Lamont. (pl) (Entered: 03/31/2008) 3/27/2008 34 MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Joseph Wigley (in his official capacity) served on 3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein; P. Stephen Lamont. (pl) (Entered: 03/31/2008) 3/27/2008 35 MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Catherine O'Hagen Wolfe (in their official capacity) served on 3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein; P. Stephen Lamont. (pl) (Entered: 03/31/2008) 3/27/2008 36 MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Richard T. Andrias (in his official capacity) served on 3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein; P. Stephen Lamont. (pl) (Entered: 03/31/2008) 3/27/2008 37 MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Thomas J. Cahill (in his official capacity) served on 3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein; P. Stephen Lamont. (pl) (Entered: 03/31/2008) 3/27/2008 38 MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Diana Maxfield Kearse (in her official capacity) served on 3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein; P. Stephen Lamont. (pl) (Entered: 03/31/2008) 3/27/2008 39 MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. A. Gail Prudenti (in her official capacity) served on 3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein; P. Stephen Lamont. (pl) (Entered: 03/31/2008) 3/27/2008 40 MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Lawrence DiGiovanna (in his official capacity) served on 3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein; P. Stephen Lamont. (pl) (Entered: 03/31/2008) 3/27/2008 41 MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Appellate Division Second Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee served on 3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein; P. Stephen Lamont. (pl) (Entered: 03/31/2008) 3/27/2008 42 MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. David Friedman (in his official capacity) served on 3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein; P. Stephen Lamont. (pl) (Entered: 03/31/2008) 3/27/2008 43 MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Luiz A. Gonzales (in his official capacity) served on 3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein; P. Stephen Lamont. (pl) (Entered: 03/31/2008) 3/27/2008 44 MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Kenneth Marvin (in his official capacity) served on 3/17/2008, answer due 4/7/2008. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein; P. Stephen Lamont. (pl) (Entered: 03/31/2008) 3/27/2008 45 MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee served on 3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein; P. Stephen Lamont. (pl) (Entered: 03/31/2008) 3/31/2008 46 ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Judge Shira A. Scheindlin from Kent K. Anker dated 3/28/2008 re: Requesting that defendants Foley & Lardner LLP, Steven C. Becker, Douglas A. Boehm, William J. Dick, and Michael W. Grebe be granted an extension of time to respond to plaintiffs' complaint. ENDORSEMENT: Defendants request is granted. Plaintiffs response is due June 30, 2008, Defendants' reply is due July 14, 2008. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 3/28/2008) (jpo) (Entered: 03/31/2008) 04/07/2008 47 MOTION to Allow Filling of an Amend/Correct 1 Complaint. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually), Eliot I. Bernstein. (jmi) (Entered: 04/08/2008) 04/07/2008 48 MOTION in Opposition to Defendants re: 12 MOTION to Dismiss Based on Material and Substantial Evidence. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually), Eliot I. Bernstein. (jmi) (Entered: 04/08/2008) 04/08/2008 49 ORDER: The Court has received a document styled "opposition to Defendants Motion to dismiss." from plaintiffs. This document was apparently sent directly to Chambers, not to the Courts Pro Se Office. Because plaintiffs have failed to comply with the Court's standing order this document is rejected. If plaintiff seeks to file a motion they must do so through the Court's Pro SE Office. The time for defendants to move to dismiss is extended to May 30, 2008, plaintiffs response is due by June 30, 2008 Defendants reply is due July 14, 2008. (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 4/8/2008) (jpo) (Entered: 04/09/2008 ) 04/11/2008 50 MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Raymond A. Joao served on 3/25/2008, answer due 5/30/2008. Service was accepted by John W. Fried. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein. (dle) (Entered: 04/11/2008) 04/11/2008 51 MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. William J. Dick served on 3/25/2008, answer due 5/30/2008. Service was accepted by William J. Dick. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein. (dle) (Entered: 04/11/2008) 04/11/2008 52 MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Douglas A. Boehm served on 3/24/2008, answer due 5/30/2008. Service was accepted by Douglas Boehm. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein. (dle) (Entered: 04/11/2008) 04/11/2008 53 MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Steven C. Becker served on 3/24/2008, answer due 5/30/2008. Service was accepted by Steven Becker. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein. (dle) (Entered: 04/11/2008) 04/11/2008 54 MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Foley Lardner LLP served on 3/20/2008, answer due 5/30/2008. Service was accepted by James R. Clark. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein. (dle) (Entered: 04/11/2008) 04/15/2008 55 ORDER that the Court has received plaintiffs' request to file an Amended Complaint. Plaintiffs' request is granted. The Amended Complaint must be filed no later than 5/10/08. Notwithstanding the filing of the Amended Complaint, defendants' deadline to move to dismiss or file an Answer remains 5/30/08. Plaintiffs' response remains due on 6/30/08. Defendants' reply, if any, remains due on 7/14/08. The parties are again reminded that the restrictions on page limits and exhibits detailed in the Court's Individual Rules and Procedures are in effect, and memoranda of law that do not comply with these Rules will be rejected. (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 4/14/08) (dle) (Entered: 04/15/2008) 04/24/2008 56 MOTION for Stephen Hall to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Document filed by Virginia State Bar, Andrew H. Goodman (in his official capacity), Andrew H. Goodman (in his individual capacity), Noel Sengel (in her official capacity), Noel Sengel (in her individual capacity), Mary W. Martelino. (dle) (Entered: 04/25/2008) 04/29/2008 n/a CASHIERS OFFICE REMARK on 56 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, in the amount of $25.00, paid on 04/24/2008, Receipt Number 649058. (jd) (Entered: 04/29/2008) 05/02/2008 57 DECLARATION of Kent K. Anker RESPONSE to Plaintiffs' Motion for Pro Bono Counsel. Document filed by Foley Lardner LLP, Michael C. Grebe, William J. Dick, Douglas A. Boehm, Steven C. Becker. (jmi) (Entered: 05/05/2008) 05/02/2008 58 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by Foley Lardner LLP, Michael C. Grebe, William J. Dick, Douglas A. Boehm, Steven C. Becker. (jmi) (Entered: 05/05/2008) 05/02/2008 59 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Lili Zandpour, Kent Kari Anker on behalf of Foley Lardner LLP, Michael C. Grebe, William J. Dick, Douglas A. Boehm, Steven C. Becker (jmi) (Entered: 05/05/2008) 05/09/2008 60 ORDER: Service of any amended complaint will be stayed until such time as the scheduled motions to dismiss have been decided. Accordingly, the time for newly named defendants to respond to the Complaint is hereby stayed until after the Court has ruled on those motions. This Order is subject to reconsideration upon receipt of opposition, if any, from plaintiffs. (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 5/9/08) (tro) (Entered: 05/12/2008) 05/12/2008 61 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Joanna Frances Smith on behalf of Steven C. Krane (in his individual capacity), Kenneth Rubenstein, Proskauer Rose LLP (pl) (Entered: 05/13/2008) 05/12/2008 62 MOTION for a pro se office to copy and transmit amended complaint to U.S. Marshal's Office. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually), P. Stephen Lamont. (pl) (Entered: 05/13/2008) 05/13/2008 63 ORDER granting 56 Motion for Stephen M. Hall to Appear Pro Hac Vice. (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 5/13/08) (mme) (Entered: 05/13/2008) 05/14/2008 64 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on re: 62 MOTION for a pro se office to copy and transmit amended complaint to U.S. Marshal's Office. filed by P. Stephen Lamont, Eliot I. Bernstein ENDORSEMENT; In accordance with this court's order dated May 9, 2008, service of any amended complaint is stayed until such the as the scheduled motions to dismiss are decided. Plaintiff's motion is therefore denied with leave to renew after that time. (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 5/13/08) (mme) (Entered: 05/14/2008) 05/22/2008 65 MOTION IN OPPOSITION TO 60 STAY ORDER dated 5/9/08 - REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION ORDER. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually), Eliot I. Bernstein, P. Stephen Lamont. (db) (Entered: 05/22/2008) 05/28/2008 66 MOTION for an order of dismissal, under FRCP Rule 12 dismissing the Complaint in this action as to the Virginia Defendants in its entirety. Document filed by Virginia State Bar, Andrew H. Goodman (in his official capacity), Andrew H. Goodman (in his individual capacity), Noel Sengel (in her official capacity), Noel Sengel(in her individual capacity), Mary W. Martelino.(dle) (Entered: 05/29/2008) 05/28/2008 67 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 66 MOTION to Dismiss. Document filed by Virginia State Bar, Andrew H. Goodman (in his official capacity), Andrew H. Goodman (in his individual capacity), Noel Sengel (in her official capacity), Noel Sengel (in her individual capacity), Mary W. Martelino. (dle) (Entered: 05/29/2008) 05/30/2008 68 MOTION for an order pursuant to F.R.C.P. 12(b)(2) and (6) to Dismiss the Amended Complaint; w/ attch. Declaration in support. Document filed by Lorraine Christine Hoffman (in her official capacity), Eric Turner (in his official capacity), John Anthony Boggs (in his official capacity), Kenneth Marvin (in his official capacity). (pl) (Entered: 05/30/2008) 05/30/2008 69 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 68 MOTION to Dismiss.. Document filed by Lorraine Christine Hoffman (in her official capacity), John Anthony Boggs (in his official capacity), Kenneth Marvin (in his official capacity, et al. (pl) (Entered: 05/30/2008) 05/30/2008 70 CROSS MOTION to Dismiss Complaint. Document filed by Meltzer Lippe Goldstein & Breistone LLP, Lewis S. Meltzer. (Howard, Richard) (Entered: 05/30/2008) 05/30/2008 71 AFFIDAVIT of Richard M. Howard, Esq. in Support re: 70 CROSS MOTION to Dismiss Complaint.. Document filed by Meltzer Lippe Goldstein & Breistone LLP, Lewis S. Meltzer. (Howard, Richard) (Entered: 05/30/2008) 05/30/2008 72 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of Notice of Cross Motion with Affidavit in Support served on Eliot I. Bernstein, P. Stephen Lamont, Monica Connell, Esq., Gregg M. Mashberg, Esq., Glenn T. Burhans, Jr., Esq., John W. Fried, Esq. on May 30, 2008. Service was made by Mail. Document filed by Meltzer Lippe Goldstein & Breistone LLP, Lewis S. Meltzer. (Howard, Richard) (Entered: 05/30/2008) DOCUMENTS FILED BUT NOT YET ON COURT DOCKET 1/25/2008 Court Memorandum to Serve 2 Copies of Complaint as Courtesy to the Attorney General [Andrew Cuomo] 2/19/2008 RE: MISSING COMPLAINTS TO US MARSHALL FOR SERVICE IN CASE 07 CIV. 11196 (SAS) ELIOT I. BERNSTEIN, ET AL. V. APPELLATE DIVISION FIRST DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENTAL DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE, ET AL. 3/5/2008 Not Docketed Re: Plaintiffs Opposition to State Defendants Letter of February 29, 2008 in Eliot I. Bernstein, et al. v. Appellate Division, First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee, et al., Docket No. 07 CV 11196 (SAS) 3/5/2008 Not Docketed and Perhaps Skipped Re: Plaintiffs Opposition to Proskauer Rose March 4, 2008 to this Court in Eliot I. Bernstein, et al. v. Appellate Division, First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee, et al., Docket No. 07 CV 11196 (SAS) 3/10/2008 New First Department Attorney Ethics Complaints filed against Proskauer Rose, LLP, Foley and Lardner, Gregg M. Mashberg of Proskauer, Joanna F. Smith of Proskauer, Todd C. Norbitz of Foley and Lardner and Anne B. Sekel of Foley and Lardner. 3/13/2008 Not Docketed Re: Plaintiffs Opposition to Court Order dated March 7, 2008 in Eliot I. Bernstein, et al. v. Appellate Division, First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee, et al., Docket No. 07 CV 11196 (SAS) 3/14/2008 Letter to New York Attorney General to reinvestigate prior Iviewit complaints against public office corruption based on the new information in Anderson 4/1/2008 Motion in Opposition to Florida Bar Motion to Dismiss Part 1 - Conflicts 4/7/2008 Motion in Opposition to Florida Bar Motion to Dismiss Part 2 4/7/2008 Motion to allow for filing Amended Complaint 9/24/2007 Letter from New York Attorney General denying investigation of public officials at First Department

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Design by Anthony Frenden & Eliot Bernstein – All rights reserved for entire site content.
©Copyright 1999-2010 Iviewit Technologies, Inc., Iviewit Holdings, Inc. and its affiliates, subsidiaries and the companies our attorneys named similar to our own to try and steal inventions.

***Note to hackers, this site is an exhibit to the United States Supreme Court, the US Second Circuit Court, the US District Court Southern District of New York, the New York Attorney General, the United States Patent & Trademark Office, the United States Patent & Trademark Office - Office of Enrollment & Discipline, the Inspector General of the US Department of Justice, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Institute of Professional Representatives before the European Patent Office (epi) and more and where tampering with this site or any documents contained herein may have federal felony ramifications, including RICO charges with a predicate act of attempted murder - hack at your own risk - or get a hacky sack and get a real life.***

This Site is Protected under the Electronic Communications Privacy Act 18 U.S.C. SS 2510-2521 and all other state, federal and international electronic communications laws!

 

  • video mixing software free
  • football manager 2011 wonderkids download shortlist
  • download mien phi game ban ga
  • baixar scrubs legendado 1 temporada
  • twilight free download full movie
  • bleach ichigo vs ulquiorra final battle
  • phone ring sound
  • certificate border vector free download
  • bob marley album download legend
  • youtube converter to mp3 free online
  • watch and free movies no registration
  • internet explorer v 5.5 free
  • sims 3 clothes s tumblr
  • sila imza album download
  • audio quran download sudais
  • baixar coletanea love 2012 som livre
  • download pics from lg optimus
  • superhero movie for mobile
  • site de de musicas gratis
  • android software for pc download
  • wiz khalifa the plan instrumental download
  • x10 mini pro android games
  • logitech orbit camera software download
  • crack microsoft word 2010 free
  • david guetta party animal free download
  • close your eyes valleys download mp3
  • os x mail download headers only
  • o gato de botas avi legendado
  • tamil typewriter keyboard software free
  • work hard play hard wiz khalifa mp3
  • itunes for windows
  • eid mubarak songs mp3 free download
  • ringtone of jannat 2 tu hi mera
  • sata drivers xp download amd
  • chittu kuruvi tamil mp3
  • latest indian movies 2011 free
  • xp burner italiano
  • need for speed demo download
  • iphone version 4
  • maher zain forgive me no music free
  • gossip girl legendado
  • papas da lingua acustico gratis
  • psx2 emulator bios
  • windows 2008 evaluation download
  • computer game gta
  • new maro charitra songs 2010
  • kernel download r4i3d
  • mp pet admit card
  • the best download manager for iphone
  • ms dos 7.10 iso
  • guitar hero downloadable songs wiki
  • bcd2000 driver download windows 7
  • prediksi soal un smp 2011
  • na hora da zona morta legendado
  • true blood season 1 free
  • fall 1997 movie free
  • macromedia flash mx download full version for free
  • lagu the queen lady gaga
  • only girl in the world remix free download
  • driver hp 1010 windows 7
  • download directly to iphone library
  • dhanush kolaveri song download video
  • need for speed underground 2 setup.exe
  • cyberlink powerdirector 6
  • vmware esxi server iso download
  • wedding style pack proshow gold 4 free
  • starry eyed mp3 free ellie goulding
  • xem phim ta»‘i nay 8h
  • hp deskjet d4260 driver download vista
  • yahoo games online
  • the smiths complete discography free download
  • dvd shrink free download for mac os x
  • itunes 5 download for iphone
  • cod 5 zombie mod menu download pc
  • mahesh babu businessman songs download doregama
  • lady marmalade mp3 christina aguilera
  • sql server r2 free
  • free books on swapping downloads
  • into the mystic free
  • peelu tere neele neele download
  • one x communicator mac download
  • windows media player 11 no validation required
  • orange caramel download lipstick
  • nps free samsung pc studio
  • sim city free demo
  • mio desktop free
  • cs full free 1.6
  • telugu movies for free download sites
  • dod source map pack download
  • le 3 rose di eva
  • arcgis 9.3 free desktop
  • windows vista business hp download
  • free tv shows download mkv
  • blade of darkness game
  • hq video songs download for mobile
  • hand rig maya
  • ishq telugu songs download doregama
  • laughter challenge 4 free
  • fm 2012 downloads skins
  • gerenciador de arquivos para android
  • take you down free download chris brown
  • heroes of hellas 2 free full
  • merlin sta ti znacim ja mp3
  • org.springframework.batch.test
  • jogos em hd para android gratis
  • baixar entre nessa danA§a 2 avi dublado
  • font download for photoshop cs3
  • download v?°a»?t nga»?c pha?§n 2 hd
  • sound driver download free windows 7
  • td jakes video sermons free downloads
  • crpg mod download warband mount and blade
  • gmod portal gun add on download
  • mp3 song sandese aate hain download
  • saxon8 dom.jar
  • download lagu rumor namaku cinta
  • sudirman lagu raya mp3 free download
  • ios firmware download 6.0
  • akb48 heavy rotation free mp3 download
  • sencha touch download registro
  • free download application for android samsung galaxy y
  • masa lalu dangdut koplo
  • songs of bodyguard free
  • mu online auto clicker free
  • telugu mp3 new songs free download 2012
  • one direction viva la vida download mp3 free
  • java linux 64 download
  • pc oyunlarA± indir download bedava
  • http://online-casino.uk.com http://online-casino.uk.com