WARNING!! DANGER WILL ROBINSON!!!
INVENTOR CAR BOMBED
IRAQI STYLE
Scroll down home page for more and more of the
Greatest Patent Story Ever Told
NOTE THAT INVENTOR BERNSTEIN'S MINIVAN WAS BLOWN UP WITH A BOMB ACCORDING TO FIRE INVESTIGATOR
RICK LEE OF THE BOYNTON BEACH FIRE DEPARTMENT. SO POWERFUL
IT BLEW UP THE CARS NEXT TO IT.
NOTE -
THAT IS WHERE THE KIDS WOULD HAVE BEEN SITTING ONLY A FEW HOURS
LATER
WARNING!
TO THOSE INTERESTED OR THINKING OF BECOMING
INVOLVED IN THE IVIEWIT CRIMES ~ WITH THE BOMBING OF
THE INVENTORS CAR, THE CHARGES FOR THE HEREIN DESCRIBED STATE, FEDERAL AND
INTERNATIONAL CRIMES FOR BOTH PERPETRATORS AND ACCOMPLICES REGARDING THE
PATENT THEFTS AND VIOLATIONS OF PUBLIC OFFICES, HAVE NOW ELEVATED TO
ATTEMPTED MURDER and according to Federal Judge Shira Scheindlin the Case is
about MURDER!!!
INDICTMENTS COMING! US Senator John Sampson Former Head of the
New York Democratic Party and Chairman of the New York Senate Judiciary
Committee was Threatened & Bribed to Cover Up NY & Federal Corruption!!
UPDATE - INDICTMENTS COMING : Iviewit
Breaking News: NY Supreme Court Ethics Oversight Bosses Alleged MISUSE of Joint
Terrorism Task Force Resources & Funds & Violations of Patriot Acts Against
Civilian Targets for Personal Gain… US Senator John Sampson Threatened & Bribed
to Cover Up NY & Federal Corruption!!
Insider Says NY State Officials Briefed on Judicial Corruption
Indictments
BREAKING NEWS: A New York State Court
administrative insider says that top state officials have been briefed by the
feds on pending federal corruption indictments that will include New York state
court employees....
And late this morning, a Washington, D.C.
source confirmed the information, adding that the target of one federal
corruption indictment will include at least one sitting New York State judge and
other individuals- all with ties to major banks.......
UPDATE: SENATOR JOHN SAMPSON, FORMER NEW
YORK SENATE JUDICIARY CHAIR THREATENED AND BRIBED TO COVER UP OFFICIAL
CORRUPTION
FRIDAY, MAY 17, 2013
Washington, D.C. Insider Says Senator John
Sampson Covered-Up Court Corruption
BREAKING NEWS: Washington, D.C. insider says
NYS Senator John Sampson covered-up evidence of widespread corruption in New
York Surrogate's Courts.
Source says Sampson was first threatened,
but then successfully bribed, to bury evidence involving countless state and
federal crimes involving billions of dollars.
Syracuse, Rochester, Albany, White Plains,
Brooklyn and Manhattan Surrogate's Courts are said to top the list of areas
involved.
It was revealed on Wednesday that a New York
State Court administrative insider said that top state officials had been
briefed by the feds on pending federal corruption indictments that would include
employees of New York's Office of Court Administration (a/ka/ "OCA"). Most court
employees, including judges, are employed by OCA.
It was further confirmed by the Washington,
D.C. source that judges, with ties to banks, would be among those charged.
Iviewit Breaking News: NY Supreme Court
Ethics Oversight Bosses Alleged MISUSE of Joint Terrorism Task Force Resources &
Funds & Violations of Patriot Acts Against Civilian Targets for Personal Gain..
FORMAL COMPLAINT FILED AGAINST NYS
EMPLOYEES FOR ILLEGAL WIRETAPPING...THE WIDESPREAD ILLEGAL WIRETAPPING INCLUDED
TARGETED NEW YORK STATE JUDGES AND ATTORNEYS.....
Robert Moossy, Jr., Section Chief
Criminal Section, Civil Rights Division
US Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, D.C. 20530
RE: FORMAL COMPLAINT AGAINST NEW YORK STATE
EMPLOYEES INVOLVING CONSTITUTIONAL VIOLATIONS, INCLUDING WIDESPREAD ILLEGAL
WIRETAPPING
Dear Mr. Moossy,
At some point in time shortly after 9/11, and
by methods not addressed here, these individuals improperly utilized access to,
and devices of, the lawful operations of the Joint Terrorism Task Force (the
JTTF). These individuals completely violated the provisions of FISA, ECPA and
the Patriot Act for their own personal and political agendas. Specifically,
these NY state employees essentially commenced black bag operations, including
illegal wiretapping, against whomever they chose- and without legitimate or
lawful purpose.
This complaint concerns the illegal use and
abuse of such lawful operations for personal and political gain, and all such
activity while acting under the color of law. This un-checked access to
highly-skilled operatives found undeserving protection for some connected
wrong-doers, and the complete destruction of others- on a whim, including the
pre-prosecution priming of falsehoods (set-ups). The aftermath of such abuse for
such an extended period of time is staggering.
It is believed that most of the 1.5
million-plus items in evidence now under seal in Federal District Court for the
Eastern District of New York, case #09cr405 (EDNY) supports the fact, over a
ten-year-plus period of time, of the illegal wiretapping of New York State
judges, attorneys, and related targets, as directed by state employees.
One sworn affidavit, by an attorney, confirms
the various illegal activity of Manhattan's attorney ethics committee, the
Departmental Disciplinary Committee (the DDC), which includes allowing cover law
firm operations to engage in the practice of law without a law license.
Specifically, evidence (attorney affidavits, etc.) supports the claim that Naomi
Goldstein, and other DDC employees supervised the protection of the unlicensed
practice of law. The evidence also shows that Ms. Goldstein knowingly permitted
the unlicensed practice of law, over a five-year-plus period of time, for the
purpose of gaining access to, and information from, hundreds of litigants.
Evidence also supports the widespread illegal
use of black bag operations by the NYS employees for a wide-range of objectives:
to target or protect a certain judge or attorney, to set-up anyone who had been
deemed to be a target, or to simply achieve a certain goal. The illegal activity
is believed to not only have involved attorneys and judges throughout all of the
New York State, including all 4 court-designated ethics departments, but also in
matters beyond the borders of New York.
The set-up of numerous individuals for an
alleged plot to bomb a Riverdale, NY Synagogue. These individuals are currently
incarcerated. The trial judge, U.S. District Court Judge Colleen McMahon, who
publicly expressed concerns over the case, saying, I have never heard anything
like the facts of this case. I don't think any other judge has ever heard
anything like the facts of this case. (2nd Circuit 11cr2763).
The concerted effort to fix numerous cases
where confirmed associates of organized crime had made physical threats upon
litigants and/or witnesses, and/or had financial interests in the outcome of
certain court cases.
The judicial and attorney
protection/operations, to gain control, of the $250 million-plus Thomas Carvel
estate matters, and the pre-prosecution priming of the $150 million-plus Brooke
Astor estate.
The wire-tapping and ISP capture, etc., of DDC
attorney, Christine C. Anderson, who had filed a lawsuit after being assaulted
by a supervisor, Sherry Cohen, and after complaining that certain evidence in
ethics case files had been improperly destroyed. (See SDNY case #07cv9599 - Hon.
Shira A. Scheindlin, U.S.D.J.)
The eToys litigation and bankruptcy, and
associates of Marc Dreir, involving over $500 million and the protection by the
DDC of certain attorneys, one who was found to have lied to a federal judge over
15 times.
The set-up and chilling of effective legal
counsel of a disabled woman by a powerful CEO and his law firms, resulting in
her having no contact with her children for over 6 years.
The wrongful detention for 4 years, prompted
by influential NY law firms, of an early whistleblower of the massive Wall
Street financial irregularities involving Bear Sterns and where protected
attorney-client conversations were recorded and distributed.
The blocking of attorney accountability in the
$1.25 billion Swiss Bank Holocaust Survivor settlement where one involved NY
admitted attorney was ultimately disbarred- in New Jersey. Only then, and after
10 years, did the DDC follow with disbarment. Gizella Weisshaus v. Fagan.
NY Supreme Court Bosses Illegally
Wiretapping Judges Chambers & Homes. Christine Anderson Whistleblower illegally
targeted for 24/7/365 surveillance in related case to Iviewit Eliot Bernstein
RICO...
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
(Free-Press-Release.com) May 14, 2013 -- According to news
reports, yes, the heads of the NY Supreme Court Ethics Department have been
accused of derailing Justice by targeting victims and misusing Government
Resources against private citizens with no other motive then Obstruction of
Justice in court and regulatory actions against them or their cronies.
World Renowned Inventor Eliot Bernstein files NEW RICO
RELATED CRIMINAL ALLEGATIONS against Law Firms Proskauer Rose, Foley & Lardner,
Greenberg Traurig and more. Allegations that Bernstein was a target of these
criminals cloaked as ATTORNEY AT LAW ETHICS BOSSES at the NY Supreme Court were
presented to Federal Judge Shira A. Scheindlin. That evidence was presented that
Bernstein's father may have been a target and murdered for his efforts to notify
the authorities and more!!!
COX VS. RANDAZZA, ET AL. “ NEVADA RICO CASE NO.
2:13-CV-00297-JCM-VCF CHANGED TO 2:13-CV-00297 JCM (NJK) CHANGED TO
2:13-CV-00297 MMD-VCF
OBSIDIAN FINANCE GROUP, LLC ET AL. V. COX CASE NO.
3:11-CV-00057-HZ (Famed First Amendment Rights Attorney at Law and Professor,
Eugene Volokh, Esq., Professor at UCLA School of Law is representing Cox on
Appeal)
---
The Beginning of the End ~ New
York Senate Judiciary Committee Hearings
September 24,
2009 - Second Hearing
Public Hearing: Standing Committee On The Judiciary New York Senate
Judiciary Committee John L. Sampson Chairman
SENATE STANDING COMMITTEE ON
THE JUDICIARY NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
SUBJECT: The Appellate Division First Department
Departmental Disciplinary Committee, the grievance committees of the various
Judicial Districts and the New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct
PURPOSE: This hearing will review the mission,
procedures and level of public satisfaction with the Appellate Division First
Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee, the grievance committees of the
various Judicial Districts as well as the New York State Commission on Judicial
Conduct
ORAL TESTIMONY BY:
Witness List for Judiciary Hearing 9/24/09 The Judicial &
Attorney Disciplinary Process in the State of New York
Richard Kuse of New City, NY
Victor Kovner of the Fund for Modem Courts
Douglas Higbee of Mamaroneck, NY
Judith Herskowitz of Miami Beach, FL
Peter Gonzalez of Troy, NY
Andrea Wilkinson of Rensselaer, NY
Maria Gkanios of Mahopac, NY
Dominic Lieto of Mahopac, NY
Regina Felton Esq of Brooklyn, NY
Kathryn Malarkey of Purchase, NY
Nora Renzuli, Esq. of Staten Island, NY
Stephanie Klein of Long Beach, NY
Ike Aruti of Rosedale, NY
Terrence Finnan of Keene, NY
Gizella Weisshaus, NY
Eliot I. Bernstein of Boca Raton, FL
Suzanne McCormick & Patrick Handley of NY
The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court is the entity
that is legally responsible for enforcing the Rules of Professional Conduct
governing the conduct of attorneys in New York State. The Appellate Division
Departments have created grievance committees that are charged with the
investigation of complaints against attorneys. Within the First Judicial
Department the Departmental Disciplinary Committee of the Appellate Division
investigates complaints against attorneys. The New York State Commission on
Judicial Conduct was created by the State Constitution and is charged with
investigating complaints against Judges and Justices of the Unified Court
System.
According to the 2009 Report of the Commission on Judicial
Conduct, there were 1,923 complaints filed in 2008. Yet of these complaints only
262 were investigated and of those, 173 were dismissed. This hearing will
examine the processes and procedures that are followed by the various agencies
charged with the responsibility of enforcing the rules and regulations that must
be followed by the Judiciary and the Bar in the State of New York. It will also
evaluate public satisfaction with the disciplinary process.
ELIOT BERNSTEIN NEW YORK
SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE HEARING TESTIMONY PART 1 of 2
ELIOT BERNSTEIN NEW YORK
SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE HEARING TESTIMONY PART 2 of 2
The Lawsuit All Starts with A Whistleblower
Complaint and Iviewit is Marked Legally Related to that Case by Federal Judge
Shira Scheindlin. In the
following video of a June 08, 2009 Judiciary Committee Hearing in New York,
Christine C. Anderson (my hero) gives the real jiggy on the NY State Court
Corruptions, she is first to testify after the Department Goons. In her Original Complaint she
mentions Iviewit and the Onion Peels henceforth.
Part 1
Part 2 New York Senate Judiciary Committee Hearings
Eliot Bernstein Speaks Out About Court
Corruption in Florida and New York on Les Winston's Talk Radio Show
Disbar the Florida Bar in Miami on 880am, a local Bloomberg Affiliate.
WARNING, p. Stephen Lamont has been terminated
from acting on behalf of Iviewit or Eliot Bernstein and has been reported for
certain alleged criminal misconduct to THE state of new York and other
authorities. If Lamont offers you shares of stock or any other inducement
involving Eliot Bernstein or Iviewit he is committing further fraud
--------
Word from
former Iviewit CEO and Shareholder P. Stephen Lamont
A Background of the Iviewit Inventions
By way of introduction, I am P. Stephen Lamont,
former Acting CEO of Iviewit
(counsel advised all Iviewit executives to resign their posts and work
along side Iviewit rather than within Iviewit, as the former Board of Directors,
Counsel and Accountants, disbanded without requisite notice to Shareholders in violation
of law, thereby leaving massive liability and exposure)
and a significant
shareholder in Iviewit. With more than a fifteen year track record as a
multimedia technology and consumer electronics licensing executive and holder of
a J.D. in Intellectual Property Law from Columbia University, an M.B.A in Finance, and a B.S. in
Industrial Engineering, I appallingly write at the cross current, by and
between parties described herein, pattern of frauds, deceits, and
misrepresentations that run so wide and so deep that it tears at the very fabric
of what has become to be know as free commerce in this country, and, in the fact
that it pertains to inventors rights, tears at the very fabric of the
Constitution of the United States more fully described below. I write to you
with, Eliot I. Bernstein, who was factually present throughout all of these events
and so has contributed to assure the veracity of the statements herein and
provide credible witness to the events described herein prior to my
joining Iviewit. Mr. Bernstein is the main inventor of the technologies, inventions
which he claims to have come from divine origin with a divine purpose.
On or about 1997, Iviewit’s founder, Eliot I.
Bernstein and other inventors, came upon inventions
pertaining to what industry experts have heretofore described as profound shifts
from traditional techniques in video and imaging then overlooked in the annals
of digital video and imaging technologies. Factually, the main video technology is one of
capturing a video frame at a, including but not limited to, 320 by 240 frame
size (roughly, ¼ of a display device) at a frame rate of one (1) to infinity
frames per second (“fps” and at the twenty four (24) to thirty (30) range
commonly referred to as “full frame rates” to those skilled in the art).
Moreover, once captured, and in its simplest terms, the scaled frames are then
digitized (if necessary), filtered, encoded, and delivered to an agnostic
display device and then scaled to a full frame size of, including but not limited to,
1280 by 960 at the full frame rates of 24 to 30 fps. The result is, when
combined with other proprietary technologies, high quality video at bandwidths
of 56 or more Kbps to 6 Mbps per second, at a surprising seventy five percent
(75%!) savings in throughput/bandwidth on any digital delivery system such as
digital terrestrial, cable, satellite, multipoint-multichannel delivery system,
or the Internet, and a similar 75%! savings in storage on mediums such as digital
video discs “DVD’s” and the hard drives of many consumer electronic devices.
Also, these savings result in a 75%! decrease in the necessary processing power
to encode the video, making old school concepts of parallel processors obsolete and allowing the
process of encoding to occur on even a laptop. Therefore, the video technology opened new
markets therefore in both low bandwidth video as is found on cell phones and
the Internet to the other end of the spectrum to high end video such as HDDVD,
etc. changing even the way television was created, transmitted and viewed, a change from interlacing to
the new Iviewit scaling processes, allowing cable companies to increase channel throughput
by 75%! Moreover, on the imaging side, the Iviewit inventions are used on
almost every digital camera and present screen design and other devices that
utilize the feature of “digital zoom”, whereby the imaging
technology provided a way to zoom almost infinitely on a low resolution file with clarity, solving
for pixilation that was inherent in the prior art. Furthermore, industry observers who
benefited from the Iviewit disclosures have gone on to claim "you could have put
10,000 engineers in a room for 10,000 years and they would never have come up
with these ideas…” These engineers similarly claimed, to a
broad audience, that the technologies were
"priceless",
the "Holy Grail" of the digital imaging and video world.
Still further, it should be clear, as it relates
to the inventions, that we are not talking about some rudimentary software that
will be rendered obsolete as newer versions emerge, but that the Iviewit video
scaling and image overlay systems are THE
backbone, enabling technologies
for the transmission of video and images across all transmission networks and
viewable on all display devices, where the inventors went back to square one to
create a wholly novel elegant upstream solution (towards the content creator) of
reconfiguring video and image frames to unlock former bandwidth constraints, led
to new processing and storage capabilities and took the video and imaging worlds
to a new dimension.
Moreover, if these inventions become the subject
of say a court ordered injunction while investigations are ongoing, it would preclude the use
of the technologies while the courts resolve these matters, similar to the
recent case
almost brought in the RIM/Blackberry matter. Although dwarfed in
comparison, that injunction would have shut Blackberry down to users had the
parties not settled the matters, by way of tremendous pressure from the Court,
the courts being on of the biggest users of the technology. The results of an injunction of the Iviewit technologies would be
catastrophic to the country in that the product recall alone would be
devastating to commerce, shutting down video across the Internet, recalling low
bandwidth cell phones, recalling digital camera’s with digital zoom, halting the
transmission of 75% of cable channels, recalling medical devices that use scaled
zoom, recalling technologies on the Hubble Space Telescope and other government
uses, such as flight and space simulators, advanced weapons systems, etc. These
matters are of tantamount importance to federal and international commerce in
countless ways, making the job of resolving the crimes against Iviewit a matter
of national security concern unprecedented in the history of invention and law.
Furthermore, initially, and early in my tenure, rumors began
swirling around the company with finger pointing and all from Florida to Los
Angeles wherein it caught the jet stream and arrived very soon in New York of
alleged breaches of confidentiality pertaining to Iviewit technology, transfers
of trade secrets, and, even in certain circumstances, the knowing and willful
invention fraud by the outright switching of signature pages of patent filings
by early patent counsels. Additionally, during my tenure, I was in possession
of an executed patent application pertaining to Iviewit’s core imaging
technology with the inventors of Bernstein and Shirajee, when, out of thin air,
and just prior to filing, with no notice or authorization, such patent application witnesses the addition of a
one Brian G. Utley as an inventor, and an individual who could not
have been farther from the heat of the inventive stage of the imaging
technology.
Still further, I submit that at the first
disclosures of the inventions, patent counsel, including Kenneth Rubenstein
(also sole patent evaluator and legal counsel to MPEG LA), who had spent half a
lifetime attempting and failing to procure technologies for the transmission of
full screen, full frame rate video across a variety of transmission networks,
and who during the Iviewit disclosures had been known to state “[I] missed
that,” and “[I] never thought of that,” and “[This] changes everything,” or
words to those effects, Rubenstein was perhaps so fearful that Iviewit would partner with other
proprietary technologies across the video value chain that it could wipe his carefully
crafted patent pools off the face of the map, therefore, the Iviewit inventions
HAD to be converted to MPEGLA, LLC to preserve those pools and convert his
client Iviewit's technologies to his pools, of course blocking Iviewit at the
same time from market using typical anti-trust tactics commonly associated with
patent pools of the past and the reason the Justice Department has typically
broken such pools up, as they are anti-competitive, monopolistic in nature.
That was the first step, with the second step,
through the direct and indirect introductions of Iviewit, with executed
confidentiality agreements (“NDA’s”), to some five hundred potential licensees
by colleagues of counsel, being the proliferation of Iviewit disclosures across
a wide array of potential licensees and competitors. In addition to tying
and bundling the technologies into his patent pool licensing scheme, again in
violation of most of the anti-trust laws.
Following along, we arrive at the point in the
past when Iviewit had thought the Iviewit inventions had been filed at the United States Patent &
Trademark Office and the United States Copyright Office and that everyone had
begun to use it, when past management in Iviewit and patent counsel were found
writing patents in patent counsels name and other non-inventor management names,
in addition to the intentional unauthorized changes of inventors, owners and
assignees. Later, as Arthur Andersen conducted an audit on behalf
of investor Crossbow Ventures whose funds were 2/3 Small Business Administration
loans, evidence emerged of a corporate shell game involving
multiple, unauthorized, similarly named corporate formations, unauthorized
stock swaps and unauthorized asset transfers that resulted in the core patent
applications assigned to entities that may have only one shareholder, perhaps the
limited liability partnership of Proskauer Rose or other unauthorized holders,
including the alleged perpetrating patent
counsel, perhaps, with a view towards resurrecting the backbone technologies at
some future point only converted illegally as their own.
Moreover, in a September 2006 letter to
Representative Nita Lowey (D-NY 18th) I wrote that in the above series of allegations,
Iviewit is confident that your Office will find a reasonable certainty that
Messrs. Kenneth Rubenstein, Esq. of Proskauer, Raymond A. Joao,
Esq. of Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolfe and Schlissel and William J. Dick, Esq., Steven Becker, Esq., and Douglas Boehm,
Esq. of Foley and Lardner, all Iviewit Patent Counsel and present or former
members of the distinguished Bar of the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, designed and executed, either for themselves or
others similarly situated, the deceptions, improprieties, and, even in certain
circumstances, outright misappropriation by the disingenuous redirection of the
disclosed Iviewit techniques by: (i) burying the critical elements of the
inventions in patent applications filed on behalf of the true Iviewit
Shareholders & Inventors; (ii) allowing the unauthorized use of Iviewit’s
inventions under NDA’s without enforcement of said NDA’s; (III) filing patent
applications of their own or others based on the Iviewit inventions into false
inventors names and illegally set up corporations; (IV) submitting knowingly
false statements and falsified documents done with intent to commit fraud on the USPTO (a federal offense), Iviewit’s shareholders, and the Iviewit
Inventors. [It should be noted here that these attorneys and others are
now under formal investigation by patent offices worldwide that have been
ongoing for several years].
Furthermore, in that same Rep. Lowey letter, that as a result of the series of
allegations enclosed, and although it is clear to Iviewit that the role of
Congress is to make law not to enforce law, Iviewit finds it reasonable that
your Office: (i) shall find the requisite merit to initiate Congressional
investigations; (ii) shall pass these allegations to a Congressional staff
attorney in the House Committee on Energy and Commerce, or other appropriate
committee, for further investigation; (iii) shall instruct said staff attorney
to institute a formal Congressional investigation, including questioning,
requests for records, and other information from all parties involved; (iv)
shall refer said attorney’s findings back to you as a Representative in the
Congress of the United States; (v) shall present such findings to the House
Committee on Energy and Commerce, or other appropriate committee, for
determinative review; and finally (vi) shall witness said Congressional
committee to urge disciplinary action against the alleged offending attorneys by
the U.S. Attorney’s Office or other organization, agency, or court of
appropriate jurisdiction.
Lastly, Iviewit often asks itself, among other
things, “Why did the Hon. Jorge LaBarga of the Circuit Court of the Fifteenth
Judicial District, Florida deny Iviewit’s Motion for Leave to Amend Answer to
Assert Counterclaim for Damages (concerning the aforementioned allegations)” and
“Why did the Supreme Court of Florida - The Florida Bar (‘TFB’) dismiss the complaint against Christopher C.
Wheeler, Esq. (‘Wheeler’ and, a non-patent attorney, a main protagonist of the
above referenced allegations) despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary” and
“Why did the Supreme Court of Florida deny Iviewit’s Petition to begin the
immediate investigation of the Wheeler complaint (when TFB admitted in writing
that the answer to the Wheeler complaint was authored by an attorney, Matthew
Triggs of Proskauer Rose, in flagrant violation of his public office
obligations)” and “Why did the Supreme Court of New York Appellate
Division First Department - Departmental Disciplinary
Committee stall Iviewit’s complaint against Rubenstein and Joao
despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary” and “Why, despite the New York
State Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department’s Court Order
(unanimously voted on by five Justices) to begin the immediate investigation of
Rubenstein, Steven C. Krane (former NYSBA President & Proskauer partner who
handled complaints against Joao and Rubenstein while maintaining undisclosed
roles at the First Department) and Joao, for conflicts and violations of New
York Supreme Court public offices, did the New York Supreme Court Appellate
Division Second Department - Departmental
Disciplinary Committee charged with conducting an immediate investigation dismiss on review the Rubenstein and Joao
complaints and stating that they were ‘not under the jurisdiction’ of the First
Department Court” [thus no witnesses were contacted, no evidence was
tested and the attorneys did not even have to respond formally or informally to
the charges against them] and "When conflicts were discovered at the Second Department
with Krane why were complaints refused by the Second Department to be formally
docketed against their members caught in conflict, those members denying complaints against
themselves???" and
“Why did the Virginia Bar Association dismiss the Dick complaint despite
overwhelming evidence to the contrary and the fact that the United States Patent
Office had suspended the Iviewit patents based on a Foley and Lardner
intellectual property docket submitted to the VBA that had factually false and
misleading information regarding patent inventors, owners and assignees” and
“Why did the Supreme Court of the United States decline to hear Iviewit’s
Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Florida Supreme Court to overturn the
Florida Court’s decision, which acted to block Iviewit from filing complaints against
Florida Supreme Court officers caught in conflicts of interest and violations of
public offices” and “why did John Doll & Jon Dudas, Commissioners' of Patents at the USPTO,
fail to correct the inventors, and refuse to take or return Iviewit’s call
or respond to formal office filings, including a petition filed more than three years ago
by Iviewit and its lead investor Crossbow Ventures/SBA, which led to the suspending
of patent applications
pending ongoing investigations” and Iviewit finds itself answering
“THAT IT IS ALL PART AND PARCEL OF THE TOTAL
DENIAL OF DUE PROCESS IN THE PATTERN OF FRAUDS, DECEITS, AND MISREPRESENTATIONS
THAT RUN SO WIDE AND SO DEEP THAT IT TEARS AT THE VERY FABRIC OF WHAT HAS BECOME
TO BE KNOW AS FREE COMMERCE IN THIS COUNTRY, AND, IN THE FACT THAT IT PERTAINS
TO INVENTORS RIGHTS, TEARS AT THE VERY FABRIC OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED
STATES.”
Lastly, take to heart this following series of events
that, from Tokyo to Munich and all places in between, has been commonly
described as THE GREATEST PATENT STORY EVER TOLD while at the same time becoming
one of the most bungled crimes in history, perhaps the largest crime ever
perpetrated in the history of crime itself; crimes constituting further a treasonous series of
actions to rob the United States Commerce Department, the country's greatest
jewel, the United States Patent & Trademark Offices, usurping Free Commerce as
we know it in America in the process! The cover-up, well to say the least, constitutes
violation after violation of sworn oaths by government officials entrusted to
uphold justice, elevating perhaps throughout the Legislative, the
Executive and the Judicial branches, creating a government of criminal activity,
a "Culture of Corruption" (paralleling the reality you now live in)
all to
deny due process and procedure, evade prosecution of the complaints filed against them
and stave off the inevitable federal prison time for their actions, as further
described herein.
WARNING!!!
READING THE
CONTENTS OF THIS SITE MAY MAKE YOU PATENT YOUR
INVENTIONS IN FOREIGN NATIONS V. THE UNITED STATES
PART I - THE HOLY GRAIL INVENTIONS
The
Company continues to pursue an aggressive intellectual property strategy. I-View-It
has protected its enabling Intellectual Properties by filing US Patent Pending
Applications, Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) International Applications, US Provisional Patent Pending
Applications, Japanese Applications, Copyrights, Trademarks, Trade Secrets (we
thinks, we are still trying to determine what was filed and what has been stolen,
investigations ongoing). Below is summary of the key
processes of the pending Intellectual Property Pool. Iviewit is a recognized innovator in the digital
capture, encoding and distribution of video and images with
patents pending, or in this case, patents suspending and is currently
focusing on three of its core IP assets:
Mathematical
Scaling Formula For Encoding & Playback of Video
The Patent Pending process that utilizes scaled
down video encodes that when transmitted to an end user
produce full-screen video representations at an amazing 75% lower bandwidth
than prior technologies. This
process enables the delivery of distortion-free rich media at full-screen,
full frame
resolution with normal TV-equivalent frame rates at extremely low bandwidths,
ideal for mediums such as the Internet, previously thought impossible. At
high bandwidths, the process provides superior processing efficiencies and
creates 75% smaller file sizes for digital distribution (i.e. DVD's, HDDVD, VCD's, SVCD's, etc.), an enormous savings
over prior compression technologies. The scaled processes have
effected all forms of hardware and software along the video value chain and have
paved the way for low bandwidth video cell phones and allowed large scale
Internet video. On the high of the bandwidth spectrum the technologies
have transformed gaming from pong like graphics to the lifelike ones as common
now in the Play Station, X-BOX, etc. The technologies having already had a
profound effect on many scientific, medical and military processes affecting
society in the endless uses of digital imaging and video technologies.
Mathematical
Scaling Formula For Encoding & Viewing Images with Super Smooth Zoom &
Pan Capabilities
Creates high definition, user controlled "super"
zoom and pan capability levels without macro blocking and pixilation. The image
scaling process is likely applicable to every known screen used in imaging,
making the list of potential applications - and revenue streams - literally
endless. From space telescopes, to digital camera's, to X-ray's, to MRI's,
to space simulators, to satellite imaging tech's like Google Maps, etc. this set
of technologies has taken the pixilation out of images when zooming
Combined
Iviewit video and imaging processes to create a user interface allowing camera
control and zoomable video streams.
Duh - Combined I View It imaging and video processes to create a user controlled
video or television environment with super zoom and pan applications.
Ellen DeGeneres Speaks Out on Iviewit Technology - "Use Iviewit for the Sake of
the Country"
Bet Ellen had no idea at the time how profound her statement
would be and how much of the country is really at stake over it.
COME JOIN IVIEWIT IN THE
GREATEST PATENT STORY EVER TOLD & PROTECT OUR COUNTRY FROM THE TERRORISTS WITHIN.
Note to Inventors and Artists:
The United States Patent Office has changed from
"First to Invent" to "First to File" and with that change the greatest country
of innovation in the world has digressed backwards and now your attorneys can
take your inventions as their own by filing it for themselves before you.
WARNING!
This site uses
technologies that may or may not be protected by the United States Patent &
Trademark Office & European Patent Office
HAS CORRUPTION REACHED OUR MOST ESTEEMED COMMERCE DEPARTMENT?
WHAT HAVE THEY DONE TO PROTECT THE INVENTIONS AND INVENTORS?
Patents suspended indefinitely, investigations lingering for five years and a
Patent Office that refuses to respond to official filings?
IVIEWIT "YOUR THIRD EYE TO THE WORLD June
8, 1999 FILED July 27, 2004
09/587,026
System & Method for Playing a Digital Video File SUSPENDED BY COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS February 26, 2004
EPO 00938126.0
System & Method for Streaming an Enhanced
Digital Video File
75/725,810
IVIEWIT "YOUR THIRD EYE TO THE WORLD June
8, 1999 FILED July 27, 2004
09/587,730
System & Method for Streaming an Enhanced Digital Video
File SUSPENDED BY COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS February 26, 2004
EPO 00944619.6
System & Method for Streaming an Enhanced
Digital Video File
75/725,816
IVIEWIT.COM June 8, 1999 FILED July 27,
2004
60/223,344
Zoom & Pan Using a Digital Camera
EPO 00955352.0
System & Method for Providing an Enhanced
Digital Image File
75/725,816
IVIEWIT June 8, 1999 FILED July 27, 2004
60/233,341
Zoom & Pan Imaging Design Tool
Japan 2001 502364
System & Method for Streaming an Enhanced
Digital Video File
75/725,817
IVIEWIT.COM June 8, 1999 FILED July 27,
2004
60,169,559
Apparatus and Method for Producing Enhanced Video Images
and/or Video Files
Japan 2001 502362
System & Method for Streaming an Enhanced
Digital Video File
75/725,817
IVIEWIT June 8, 1999 FILED July 27, 2004
60/155,404
Apparatus & Method for Producing Enhanced Video Images
and/or Video Files
Japan 2001 514379
System & Method for Providing an Enhanced
Digital Image File
75/725,818
IVIEWIT.COM June 8, 1999 FILED July 27,
2004
60/149,737
Apparatus and Method for Producing Enhanced Digital Images
and/or Digital Video Files
Korea PCT US00 15408
75/725,819
THE CLICK HEARD 'ROUND THE WORLD June 8,
1999 FILED July 27, 2004
60/146,726
Apparatus & Method for Producing Enhanced Digital Images
75/725,819
IVIEWIT.COM June 8, 1999 FILED July 27,
2004
60/141,440
Apparatus & Method for Providing and/or transmitting Video
Data and/or Information in a Communication Network
75/725,820
IVIEWIT.COM June 8, 1999 FILED July 27,
2004
60/137,921
Apparatus & Method for Playing Video Files Across the
Internet
75/725,821
IVIEWIT June 8, 1999 FILED July 27, 2004
60/137,297
Apparatus & Method for Producing Enhanced Video Images
75/725,821
THE CLICK HEARD 'ROUND THE WORLD June 8,
1999 FILED July 27, 2004
60/125,824
Apparatus & Method for Producing Enhanced Digital Images
75/725,822
IVIEWIT June 8, 1999 FILED July 27, 2004
75/725,823
IVIEWIT June 8, 1999 FILED July 27, 2004
75/725,823
THE CLICK HEARD 'ROUND THE WORLD June 8,
1999 FILED July 27, 2004
76/037,700
IVIEWIT.COM May 1, 2000 FILED July 27, 2004
76/037,701
A SITE FOR SORE EYES May 1, 2000 FILED July
27, 2004
76/037,702
A SITE FOR SORE EYES May 1, 2000 FILED July
27, 2004
76/037,703
IVIEWIT May 1, 2000 FILED July 27, 2004
76/037,843
IVIEWIT LOGO May 1, 2000 FILED July 27,
2004
76/037,844
May 1, 2000 FILED July 27, 2004
PART II - THE CRIMES AND CRIMINALS IN THE ATTEMPT TO STEAL
THE IVIEWIT INVENTIONS
"The greatest want of the world is the want
of men, --men who will not be bought or sold; men who in their inmost souls are
true and honest, men who do not fear to call sin by its right name; men whose
conscience is as true to duty as the needle to the pole, men who will stand for
the right though the heavens fall. -Education, p. 57(1903)"
ELLEN G. WHITE
Complaint filed with the DOJ - OIG after the FBI
lost the Iviewit case file and the Car Bombing files. Iviewit was told the
agent handling the matters had retired early with the case files!
Letter from the DOJ - OPR stating they have begun
review of the matters. At this level of Justice, if the Justice Department tries
to wiggle from the obligation to investigate and prosecute, it would take
Alberto Gonzales or whomever replaces him to evade all due process and procedure in these matters and
that order could only come from his remaining supporter, the President, the
Decider and those who pull puppet strings. With Gonzales as credible as a
perjurer, liar and possibly a war criminal, one would assume that these are the
reasons the Bush Regime can not let him go. At that point, the country
will become embroiled in Patentgate sooner or later, as it would take 20 years
of the patent life and beyond to avoid the matters without due process, a
non-reality.
December 15, 2007 Iviewit Federal
Complaint Filed in the United States District Court - New York Southern District
-- Filed in response to Whistleblower case revealing New York Supreme Court
Officers Covered-Up Ethic Cases like Iviewit, as reported in NY Times and NY Law
Journal below.
United States District Court - New York
Sothern District
Case No. 07 CV 11196
The
MAYBE NOT SO Honorable Judge Shira A. Scheindlin or the MOST HONORABLE JUDGE ON
HER WAY TO THE SUPREME COURT
NEW YORK POST ~ August 17, 2006
'JUNIOR' SINGS SOPRANO August 17, 2006 -- John
"Junior" Gotti finally sang - but it was "Happy Birthday" to a federal judge.
Gotti helped Manhattan federal Judge Shira Scheindlin celebrate her 60th
birthday by serenading her from his seat at the defense table yesterday. "I led
the attack," Gotti said outside of court. "Everyone was saying, 'We're going to
sing, we're going to sing,' and then they started chickening out." The bizarre
and unusual birthday celebration was carried out in the courtroom - which was
mysteriously closed to the public - before jury selection in Gotti's
racketeering trial resumed for a third day. The mob scion was joined singing,
"Happy Birthday Judge Scheindlin," by at least one of his defense lawyers,
members of the prosecution team and court personnel. Participation wasn't
exactly optional after the judge's courtroom deputy instructed everyone present
in the courtroom to participate. Gotti and Scheindlin have been through a lot
together over the past year. The former Gambino leader is facing his third trial
for racketeering after two previous juries failed to reach a verdict - with all
of the trials taking place in Scheindlin's courtroom. Later in the day the judge
got some chuckles when she agreed to excuse a potential juror who had plans to
travel to Paris to celebrate her mother's 60th birthday. "I'm particularly
sympathetic to 60th birthdays," Scheindlin said. Scheindlin's mini-bash, which
lacked gifts and cake, was a private affair. When a reporter tried to enter the
courtroom as the singing was about to begin, deputies with the U.S. Marshals
Service said the judge's deputy had instructed them to bar the public for 10
minutes, but they could not say why. Courtrooms are typically closed to the
public only to protect the identity of cooperating witnesses, undercover agents
and the victims of sex crimes, or for national-security concerns. Legal experts
raised eyebrows at the fact that Scheindlin allowed the impromptu fete to occur
at all. "This is not a major violation of judicial ethics. It's a pimple on the
trial," said David Luban, law professor and legal ethicist at Georgetown
University. "I think she ought to have stopped it. I think any trial judge is
perfectly capable of cutting them off if something is not proper. It casts doubt
in the judge's own partiality if the judge allows the defendant to sing 'Happy
Birthday,' " said Luban. "It's a bizarre situation in the middle of the criminal
trial singing 'Happy Birthday.' It's inappropriate," said Christopher Murray, a
civil-rights attorney based in Garden City, L.I. Opening statements in the trial
could take place as soon as this afternoon.
______________________________________
From Wikipedia
Judge Scheindlin presided over three trials of
John Gotti Jr. ("Junior"), each of which ended in a mistrial due to a deadlocked
jury.[6] The principle charge against Gotti in the trials was racketeering
conspiracy stemming from Gotti's alleged management of the Gambino crime family
following the incarceration and death of his father, John Gotti Sr. (the "Dapper
Don"). "On September 20, 2005, the jury acquitted him of securities fraud and
hung 11-1 for conviction on racketeering charges that included the assault on
Sliwa. His re-trial on the remaining charges the following March also ended in a
mistrial, with the jury hung 8-4 for acquittal. At the third trial involving the
Sliwa assault, prosecutors convinced 12 jurors that Junior had ordered the
kidnapping but failed to convince them that he had engaged in criminal activity
after 1999 and the jury again deadlocked on the racketeering charges, this time
voting 8-4 for conviction."
U.S. District Court
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
(Foley Square)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:07-cv-11196-SAS
Bernstein et al v. Appellate Division First Department
Departmental Disciplinary Committee et al Assigned to: Judge Shira A. Scheindlin Demand: $9,999,000
Date Filed: 12/12/2007 Jury Demand: Plaintiff Nature of Suit: 470 Racketeer/Corrupt Organization Jurisdiction: Federal Question
Plaintiff
Eliot I. Bernstein Individually
represented by
Eliot I. Bernstein
PRO SE
Plaintiff
Eliot I. Bernstein
represented by
Eliot I. Bernstein
(See above for address)
PRO SE
Plaintiff
P. Stephen Lamont on behalf of Shareholders of UVIEW.COM, INC. – DL;
IVIEWIT HOLDINGS, INC. – DL; IVIEWIT HOLDINGS, INC. – DL;
IVIEWIT HOLDINGS, INC. – FL; IVIEWIT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. –
DL; IVIEWIT.COM, INC. – FL; IVIEWIT.COM, INC. - DL; I.C.,
INC. – FL; IVIEWIT.COM LLC – DL; IVIEWIT LLC – DL; IVIEWIT
CORPORATION – FL; IVIEWIT, INC. – FL; IVIEWIT, INC. – DEL;
IVIEWIT CORPORATION. ANY OTHER JOHN DOE COMPANIES (“JOHN
DOE”) NOT KNOWN AT THIS TIME, AS INVESTIGATIONS REMAIN OPEN; and Patent Interest Holders
represented by
Eliot I. Bernstein & P. Stephen Lamont
PRO SE
Plaintiffs
Shareholders of UVIEW.COM, INC. – DL; IVIEWIT HOLDINGS,
INC. – DL; IVIEWIT HOLDINGS, INC. – DL; IVIEWIT HOLDINGS,
INC. – FL; IVIEWIT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. – DL; IVIEWIT.COM,
INC. – FL; IVIEWIT.COM, INC. - DL; I.C., INC. – FL;
IVIEWIT.COM LLC – DL; IVIEWIT LLC – DL; IVIEWIT CORPORATION
– FL; IVIEWIT, INC. – FL; IVIEWIT, INC. – DEL; IVIEWIT
CORPORATION. ANY OTHER JOHN DOE COMPANIES (“JOHN DOE”) NOT
KNOWN AT THIS TIME, AS INVESTIGATIONS REMAIN OPEN; and Patent Interest Holders:
Bernstein, Jacob Noah Archie formerly The Jacob
Bernstein 1999 Trust
Bernstein, Joshua Ennio Zander formerly The Joshua
Bernstein 1999 Trust
Bernstein, Mark
Bernstein, Simon L. and Shirley
Bernstein, Stanley & Charlotte
Bernstein, Stephen
Bernstein, Theodore and Children
Bieler @ Bieler Bros. Records
Billotti, Beverly & Chip
Bleemusic Inc.
Blue Fiddle Records
Bouhenguel, Redjem
Brady, Frank
Brandon, Jennifer
Brunelas, Charles
Burnham, Frank
Butler, Edward
C. Allen Produtions
Calkins, John & Rebecca
Campion, John & Edmund
Castro, Tony and Children
Chavez, Charles
Chey, Douglas
Chirino, Tony
Clark, Tim
Cohen, James
Cohen, Karen & Laurie
Colter, David
Cookman, John E. Jr.
Cordero, Amber
Cowman, Jenna
Crawford, Megan
Crush Music Media Management
Daniels, Patricia
Davis, John & Gregg (on behalf of Marvin & Barbara
Davis)
Deleo, Lisa
DiBedart, George
Dietz, Andrew and Donna and Children
Dittner, Chris & Cori
Diversafest LLC [DFEST]
Doyle, Matt and Michelle
Dusha, Bill
Ellis, Stacey
Engle, Noble
Erika R. Lewin
Evolution Promotions
Feigenbaum, Robert
Fischman, Joseph
Flecktones Tours LLC
Frazier, Sherri & Children
Freidkin, Monte
Frenden, Anthony
Friedstein , Jeffrey and Lisa and Children
Fritz, Brian
Fueled By Ramen Inc.
Gaffney, Esq., Mark W.
Gailet, Aubrie
Galvin, John
Garber, Edward
Garlipp, Joe
Gaspari, Maxemillion
George, William
Giordano, Anthony
Gluzband, Melissa
Gold, Steve
Goldstein, James & Christine
Gonsalves, Gregory
Gonsalves, Joel & Robin and Children
Gonsalves, Thaddeus and Judy and Children
Gonzales, Frank & Renee
Gorge, Sal
Gorman, Mitchell
Gregg, Jason
Grimes, Dale & Carol Groves
Grote, Lorna and Christopher
Guccione, Robert
Hagen, Lisa
Hale, Molly and Todd
Hanes, Leah
Happy Feet Living Trust - Ellen DeGeneres
Hard Head Management
Heche Trust - Anne Heche
Hendricks, Lisa
Hirschtick, Jon K.
Holfer, Larry
Horowitz, Marcel & Florence
Howard, Brett
I Hate Kate
Iantoni, Guy & Jill
In DeGoot
Indivision Management
INVESTECH Holdings LLC - H. Wayne Huizenga and H.
Wayne Huizenga Jr.
Irell & Manella
Iviewit Charitable Giving Fund (Thought Journal)
Jackoway, Esq., James and Jackoway, Esq., Michele
Marlene Mulrooney and Children
Jacobs, Jon
James, Russell
JMAX Productions
Jurcak, Courtney
Kane, Donald G.
Katz, Zach
Kaye, Timothy
Kennedy, Lori
Kershaw, Sarah
Kiley, Karen & Kevin
Klein, Beth and Frederick
Kluge, Jennifer
Krauel, Heidi
Krokower, Robert
Lamont, P. Stephen
Lauren Lloyd Living Trust
LCD Soundsystem
Leavitt, Amanda
Leavitt, Wayne
Leonsis, Ted
Lequeux, Blayne
Less than Jake
Lewin, Gerald R. & Barbara S.
Lewin, Jennifer P.
Lewinter, Esq., Anthony
Liu, Vinnie
Lockwood, Kevin
Lypaczewski, Paul
Lyte, Seamus
Magnussen, Ryan
Marino, Susie
McCrirrick, Flip and Leanne
McCullough, Lyle
McDonough Management
McFarland, William
McGee, Doc
McKittrick, Alan
Merritt & Sophia Howard Fund
Miah, Hassan
Milano Music Management
Miller, Paul
Milligan, Beverly
Mink, Matthew
Mitroo, Sumair
Moore, Charles Michael
Morgan, Misty
Morissette, Alanis
Morra, Buddy
Moss, Gina
Nadelman, Ari & Yona
Nance-Poor, Steve
Nathanson, Gary
New Media Holdings, Inc.
Newman, Carolyn
Nielsen, Gary
Nixon, Eric
Nixon, Sherri
Noyes, Mark
Ollivier, Jamie
Osterling, James
Palermo, RosE
Pay Up Management / Idolz Maker
Peake, Don
Perkiss, Corri
Pettus, Gary & Three Doors Down
Brad Arnold
Matt Roberts
Todd Harrell
Chris Henderson
Greg Upchurch
Pfeffer, Louis
Phillips, Matt
Preston, Daniel
Raymond, Tammy
Reale, Michael
Rebel Waltz
Reynolds, Joe & Shiny Toy Guns
Gregori Chad Petree
Jeremy Dawson
Mikey Martin
Sisely Treasure
Roach, Kevin
Roberman, Robert
Rock-It Cargo, USA Inc. Employee Pool
Roe, Jeff
Rogers, Esq., Caroline P. and Geoffrey and Children
Rogers, Spencer and Dana
Rosario, Jude
Rosen, Irving
Rosman, Esq., Richard
Rousseaux, Harmony
Ryan, Joseph
Sanctuary
Sanford, Thomas
Scanlan, Jack
Schleicher, Stephen
Seibert, Michael J.
Selz, Steven
Shirajee, Zakirul
Siefken, Rob
Silent Owners
Simon, Adam
Simon, David and Pamela and Children
Simon, John
Simpson, Crystal and Lucas
Simpson, Matthew
Sklar, Steve
Slaby, William and Michelle
Smith, Chris
Smith, Shenell
Special Team Music
Staley, Kim
Stanger, Bettie
Stanger, Dana
Stanger, Ginger
Stanger, Jeffrey and Kimberly and Children
Stanger, Lynn & Francis
Stanger, Paul
Stark, Joan
Steven Nevius
Stillman, John
Stomp, Michael and Nikki
Stomp, Sherry
STP Employee Fund
Street, Brian
Stuart, John
Supowitz, Lou
Sutherland, Steven
Terri, Chris
Thagard, Gregory B.
The Pocket Recordings
Tidal 4
Tuvia School
Utke, Karen & Brian
Valence, Jane
Veneer, Robert and Kari and Children
Verona, Stephen
Verzaal, Jessica
Villam Artists
Wall, Jeremey
Warren, Bruce
Washington, Debbie
Welch, Scott
Welsch, Mitchell & Isa
Westphal, Stew
Winters, Dorothy
World Audience
Young, Alan
Yuricek, Jeremy
Zamarin, Mitch
V.
Defendant
STATE OF NEW YORK, THE OFFICE OF
COURT ADMINISTRATION OF THE UNIFIED COURT SYSTEM,
PROSKAUER ROSE LLP, and, all of its
Partners, Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional
and individual capacities,
STEVEN C. KRANE in his official
and individual Capacities for the New York State Bar
Association (former President of the NYSBA) and the
Appellate Division First Department Departmental
Disciplinary Committee (officer of the Court), and, his
professional and individual capacities as a Proskauer
partner,
KENNETH RUBENSTEIN, in his
professional and individual capacities,
ESTATE OF STEPHEN KAYE, in his
professional and individual capacities,
ALAN S. JAFFE, in his
professional and individual capacities,
ROBERT J. KAFIN, in his
professional and individual capacities,
CHRISTOPHER C. WHEELER, in his
professional and individual capacities,
MATTHEW M. TRIGGS in his
official and individual capacity for The Florida Bar and
his professional and individual capacities as a partner
of Proskauer,
ALBERT T. GORTZ, in his
professional and individual capacities,
CHRISTOPHER PRUZASKI, in his
professional and individual capacities,
MARA LERNER ROBBINS, in her
professional and individual
capacities,
DONALD “ROCKY” THOMPSON, in his
professional and individual
capacities,
GAYLE COLEMAN, in her
professional and individual capacities,
DAVID GEORGE, in his
professional and individual capacities,
GEORGE A. PINCUS, in his
professional and individual capacities,
GREGG REED, in his professional
and individual capacities,
LEON GOLD, in his professional
and individual capacities,
MARCY HAHN-SAPERSTEIN, in her
professional and individual capacities,
KEVIN J. HEALY, in his
professional and individual capacities,
STUART KAPP, in his professional
and individual capacities,
RONALD F. STORETTE, in his
professional and individual capacities,
CHRIS WOLF, in his professional
and individual capacities,
JILL ZAMMAS, in her professional
and individual capacities,
JON A. BAUMGARTEN, in his
professional and individual capacities,
SCOTT P. COOPER, in his
professional and individual capacities,
BRENDAN J. O'ROURKE, in his
professional and individual capacities,
LAWRENCE I. WEINSTEIN, in his
professional and individual capacities,
WILLIAM M. HART, in his
professional and individual capacities,
DARYN A. GROSSMAN, in his
professional and individual capacities,
JOSEPH A. CAPRARO JR., in his
professional and individual capacities,
JAMES H. SHALEK, in his
professional and individual capacities,
GREGORY MASHBERG, in his
professional and
individual capacities,
JOANNA SMITH, in her
professional and individual capacities,
MELTZER LIPPE GOLDSTEIN WOLF &
SCHLISSEL, P.C. and its predecessors and successors,
and, all of its Partners, Associates and Of Counsel, in
their professional and individual capacities,
LEWIS S. MELTZER, in his
professional and individual capacities,
KENNETH RUBENSTEIN, in his
professional and individual capacities,
RAYMOND A. JOAO, in his
professional and individual capacities,
FRANK MARTINEZ, in his
professional and individual capacities,
FOLEY & LARDNER LLP, and, all of its
Partners, Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional
and individual capacities,
MICHAEL C. GREBE, in his
professional and individual capacities,
WILLIAM J. DICK, in his
professional and individual capacities,
TODD C. NORBITZ, in his
professional and individual capacities,
ANNE SEKEL, in his professional
and individual capacities,
RALF BOER, in his professional
and individual capacities,
BARRY GROSSMAN, in his
professional and individual capacities,
JIM CLARK, in his professional
and individual capacities,
DOUGLAS A. BOEHM, in his
professional and individual capacities,
STEVEN C. BECKER, in his
professional and individual capacities,
FORMER IVIEWIT MANAGEMENT
BRIAN G. UTLEY,
MICHAEL REALE,
RAYMOND HERSCH,
WILLIAM KASSER,
ROSS MILLER, ESQ. in his
professional and individual capacities,
STATE OF FLORIDA, OFFICE OF THE
STATE COURTS ADMINISTRATOR, FLORIDA,
HON. JORGE LABARGA in his official
and individual capacities,
THE FLORIDA BAR,
JOHN ANTHONY BOGGS in his
official and individual capacities,
KELLY OVERSTREET JOHNSON (former
President) in her official and individual capacities,
LORRAINE CHRISTINE HOFFMAN in
her official and individual capacities,
ERIC TURNER in his official and
individual capacities,
KENNETH MARVIN in his official
and individual capacities,
JOY A. BARTMON in her official
and individual capacities,
JERALD BEER in his official and
individual capacities,
BROAD & CASSEL, and, all of its
Partners, Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional
and individual capacities,
KELLY OVERSTREET JOHNSON (former
President) in her official and individual capacities,
JAMES J. WHEELER, in his
professional and individual capacities,
FLORIDA SUPREME COURT,
Hon. Charles T.
Wells, in his official and individual capacities,
Hon. Harry Lee
Anstead, in his official and individual
capacities,
Hon. R. Fred
Lewis, in his official and individual capacities,
Hon. Peggy A.
Quince, in his official and individual
capacities,
Hon. Kenneth B.
Bell, in his official and individual capacities,
THOMAS HALL, in his official and
individual capacities,
DEBORAH YARBOROUGH in her
official and individual capacities,
DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND
PROFESSIONAL REGULATION – FLORIDA,
CITY OF BOCA RATON, FLA.,
ROBERT FLECHAUS in his official
and individual capacities,
ANDREW SCOTT in his official and
individual capacities,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK APPELLATE
DIVISION FIRST DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENTAL DISCIPLINARY
COMMITTEE,
THOMAS
J. CAHILL in his official and individual capacities,
PAUL CURRAN in his official and
individual capacities,
MARTIN R. GOLD in his official
and individual capacities,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK APPELLATE
DIVISION FIRST DEPARTMENT,
CATHERINE O’HAGEN WOLFE in her
official and individual capacities,
HON. ANGELA M. MAZZARELLI in her
official and individual capacities,
HON. RICHARD T. ANDRIAS in his
official and individual capacities,
HON. DAVID B. SAXE in his
official and individual capacities,
HON. DAVID FRIEDMAN in his
official and individual capacities,
HON. LUIZ A. GONZALES in his
official and individual capacities,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK APPELLATE
DIVISION SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT,
JAMES E. PELTZER in his official
and individual capacities,
HON. A. GAIL PRUDENTI in her
official and individual capacities,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK APPELLATE
DIVISION SECOND DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENTAL DISCIPLINARY
COMMITTEE,
LAWRENCE DIGIOVANNA in his
official and individual capacities,
DIANA MAXFIELD KEARSE in her
official and individual capacities,
HON. JUDITH S. KAYE (Chief Judge of
the State of New York, New York Court of Appeals) in
her official and individual capacities,
STATE OF NEW YORK COMMISSION OF
INVESTIGATION,
ANTHONY CARTUSCIELLO in his
official and individual capacities,
LAWYERS FUND FOR CLIENT PROTECTION
OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF
THE STATE OF NEW YORK,
ELIOT SPITZER in his official and
individual capacities, as both former Attorney General
for the State of New York, and, as former Governor of
the State of New York,
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA,
VIRGINIA STATE BAR,
ANDREW H. GOODMAN in his
official and individual capacities,
NOEL SENGEL in her official and
individual capacities,
MARY W. MARTELINO in her
official and individual capacities,
LIZBETH L. MILLER, in her
official and individual capacities,
MPEGLA, LLC,
LAWRENCE HORN, in his
professional and individual capacities,
KENNETH RUBENSTEIN, in his
professional and individual capacities,
REAL 3D, INC. (INTEL, SILICON
GRAPHICS, INC. & LOCKHEED MARTIN) and successor companies,
GERALD STANLEY, in his
professional and individual capacities,
DAVID BOLTON, in his
professional and individual capacities,
TIM CONNOLLY, in his
professional and individual capacities,
ROSALIE BIBONA, in her
professional and individual capacities,
RYJO, INC.,
RYAN HUISMAN, in his
professional and individual capacities,
INTEL CORP.,
LARRY PALLEY, in his
professional and individual capacities,
SILICON GRAPHICS, INC.,
LOCKHEED MARTIN,
BLAKELY SOKOLOFF TAYLOR & ZAFMAN,
LLP, and, all of its Partners, Associates and Of Counsel, in
their professional and individual capacities,
NORMAN ZAFMAN, in his
professional and individual capacities,
THOMAS COESTER, in his
professional and individual capacities,
FARZAD AHMINI, in his
professional and individual capacities,
GEORGE HOOVER, in his
professional and individual capacities,
WILDMAN,
HARROLD, ALLEN & DIXON LLP, and, all of its Partners,
Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and
individual capacities,
MARTYN W. MOLYNEAUX, in his
professional and individual capacities,
MICHAEL DOCKTERMAN, in his
professional and individual capacities,
HARRISON GOODARD FOOTE, and, all of
its Partners, Associates and Of Counsel, in their
professional and individual capacities,
MARTYN W. MOLYNEAUX, in his
professional and individual capacities,
EUROPEAN PATENT OFFICE,
ALAIN POMPIDOU (former
President) in his official and individual capacities,
WIM VAN DER EIJK in his official
and individual capacities,
LISE DYBDAHL in her official and
personal capacities,
YAMAKAWA INTERNATIONAL PATENT
OFFICE, and, all of its Partners, Associates and Of Counsel,
in their professional and individual capacities,
MASAKI YAMAKAWA, in his
professional and individual capacities,
CROSSBOW VENTURES, INC.,
ALPINE VENTURE CAPITAL PARTNERS
LP,
STEPHEN J. WARNER, in his
professional and individual capacities,
RENE P. EICHENBERGER, in his
professional and individual capacities,
H. HICKMAN “HANK” POWELL, in
his professional and individual capacities,
MAURICE BUCHSBAUM, in his
professional and individual capacities,
ERIC CHEN, in his
professional and individual capacities,
AVI HERSH, in his
professional and individual capacities,
MATTHEW SHAW, in his
professional and individual capacities,
BRUCE W. SHEWMAKER, in his
professional and individual capacities,
RAVI M. UGALE, in his
professional and individual capacities,
Digital Interactive
Streams, Inc.,
Royal o’brien,
in his professional and individual capacities,
HUIZENGA HOLDINGS INCORPORATED,
WAYNE HUIZENGA, in his
professional and individual capacities,
WAYNE HUIZENGA, JR., in his
professional and individual capacities,
TIEDEMANN INVESTMENT GROUP,
BRUCE T. PROLOW, in his
professional and individual capacities,
CARL TIEDEMANN, in his
professional and individual capacities,
ANDREW PHILIP CHESLER, in his
professional and individual capacities,
CRAIG L. SMITH, in his
professional and individual capacities,
Houston & Shahady,
P.a., and any successors, and, all of its Partners,
Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and
individual capacities,
BART A. HOUSTON, ESQ. in his
professional and individual capacities,
FURR & COHEN, P.A., and, all of its
Partners, Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional
and individual capacities,
BRADLEY S. SCHRAIBERG, ESQ. in
his professional and individual capacities,
MOSKOWITZ, MANDELL, SALIM & SIMOWITZ,
P.A., and, all of its Partners, Associates and Of Counsel,
in their professional and individual capacities,
WILLIAM G. SALIM, ESQ. in his
professional and individual capacities,
SACHS SAX & KLEIN, P.A., and, all of
its Partners, Associates and Of Counsel, in their
professional and individual capacities,
BEN ZUCKERMAN, ESQ. in his
professional and individual capacities,
SPENCER M. SAX, in his
professional and individual capacities,
SCHIFFRIN & BARROWAY LLP, and any
successors, and, all of its Partners, Associates and Of
Counsel, in their professional and individual capacities,
RICHARD SCHIFFRIN, in his
professional and individual capacities,
ANDREW BARROWAY, in his
professional and individual capacities,
KRISHNA
NARINE, in his professional and individual capacities,
CHRISTOPHER & WEISBERG, P.A., and,
all of its Partners, Associates and Of Counsel, in their
professional and individual capacities,
ALAN M. WEISBERG, in his
professional and individual capacities,
ALBERTO GONZALES in his official
and individual capacities,
JOHNNIE E. FRAZIER in his
official and individual capacities,
IVIEWIT, INC., a Florida
corporation,
IVIEWIT, INC., a Delaware
corporation,
IVIEWIT HOLDINGS, INC., a Delaware
corporation (f.k.a. Uview.com, Inc.)UVIEW.COM, INC., a Delaware
corporation
IVIEWIT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a
Delaware corporation (f.k.a. Iviewit Holdings, Inc.),
IVIEWIT HOLDINGS, INC., a Florida
corporation,
IVIEWIT.COM, INC., a Florida
corporation,
I.C., INC., a Florida corporation,
IVIEWIT.COM, INC., a Delaware
corporation,
IVIEWIT.COM LLC, a Delaware limited
liability company,
IVIEWIT LLC, a Delaware limited
liability company,
IVIEWIT CORPORATION, a Florida
corporation,
AMENDED SUMMONS ISSUED as to Catherine O'Hagen Wolfe (in their
individual capacity), Paul Curran (in their official capacity),
Paul Curran (in individual capacity), Martin R. Gold (in his
individual capacity), Martin R. Gold (in their official
capacity), Angela M. Mazzarelli (in her official capacity),
Angela M. Mazzarelli (in her individual capacity), Richard T.
Andrias (in his official capacity), Richard T. Andrias (in his
individual capacity), David B. Saxe, David B. Saxe, David
Friedman (in his official capacity), David Friedman (in his
individual capacity), Luiz A. Gonzales (in his official
capacity), Luiz A. Gonzales (in his individual capacity),
Appellate Division Second Department Departmental Disciplinary
Committee, Lawrence DiGiovanna (in his official capacity),
Lawrence DiGiovanna (in his individual capacity), Diana Maxfield
Kearse (in her official capacity), Diana Maxfield Kearse (in her
individual capacity), James E. Peltzer (in his official
capacity), James E. Peltzer (in his individual capacity), A.
Gail Prudenti (in her official capacity), A. Gail Prudenti (in
her individual capacity), Steven C. Krane (in his official
capacity), Steven C. Krane (in his individual capacity), Judith
S. Kaye, Judith S. Kaye, Kenneth Rubenstein, Estate of Stephen
Kaye, Proskauer Rose LLP, Meltzer Lippe Goldstein & Breistone
LLP, Lewis S. Meltzer, Raymond A. Joao, Foley Lardner LLP,
Michael C. Grebe, William J. Dick, Douglas A. Boehm, Steven C.
Becker, State of New York Commission of Investigation, Appellate
Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee,
Lawyers Fund for Client Protection of the State of New York, The
Florida Bar, Lorraine Christine Hoffman (in her official
capacity), Lorraine Christine Hoffman (in her individual
capacity), Eric Turner (in his official capacity), Eric Turner
(in his individual capacity), John Anthony Boggs (in his
official capacity), John Anthony Boggs (in his individual
capacity), Kenneth Marvin (in his official capacity), Kenneth
Marvin (in his individual capacity), Thomas J. Cahill (in his
official capacity), Thomas Hall (in his official capacity),
Thomas Hall (in his individual capacity), Debroah Yarborough (in
her official capacity), Debroah Yarborough (in her individual
capacity), Virginia State Bar, Andrew H. Goodman (in his
official capacity), Andrew H. Goodman (in his individual
capacity), Noel Sengel (in her official capacity), Noel Sengel
(in her individual capacity), Mary W. Martelino, Thomas J.
Cahill (in his individual capacity), John Does, Joseph Wigley
(in his official capacity), Joseph Wigley (in his individual
capacity), Catherine O'Hagen Wolfe (in their official capacity).
(tro) (Entered: 01/25/2008)
MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons
and Complaint, served. David B. Saxe served on 2/28/2008, answer
due 3/19/2008; David B. Saxe served on 2/28/2008, answer due
3/19/2008. Service was accepted by David B. Saxe. Document filed
by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein. (dle)
(Entered: 03/10/2008)
MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons
and Complaint, served. Martin R. Gold (in his individual
capacity) served on 2/29/2008, answer due 3/20/2008; Martin R.
Gold (in their official capacity) served on 2/29/2008, answer
due 3/20/2008. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein
(Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein. (jmi) (Entered: 03/14/2008)
ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE. John Anthony Boggs (in his official
capacity) served on 3/4/2008, answer due 3/24/2008. Service was
accepted by John Anthony Boggs. Document filed by Eliot I.
Bernstein. (djc) (Entered: 03/17/2008)
3/19/2008
10
MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE UNEXECUTED as to
Debroah Yarborough (in her official capacity). Attempted Service
of Summons and Complaint. Service was attempted on 3/12/08.
Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually), Eliot I.
Bernstein. (pl) (Entered: 03/20/2008)
3/21/2008
11
ORDER: plaintiffs are again reminded that pursuant to
Standing Order M10-468, all communications with the Court,
including all motions and letters are to be directed to the
Court's Pro Se Office, not to chambers. Violation of the
Standing Order may lead to a finding of contempt of
court. Plaintiffs have requested reconsideration of the Court's
Order dated March 7, 2008. The Court declines to revisit its
earlier decision. Plaintiffs have also requested legal advice on
several topics. The Court does not give legal advice to parties.
Plaintiffs have requested legal advice on several topics. The
Court does not give legal advice to parties. Plaintiffs have
requested that the Court notify the appropriate authorities of
defendants' alleged criminal misconduct. At this early stage of
the litigation, such notification would be both inappropriate
and premature. Finally, plaintiffs have requested permission to
make use of the Court's electronic case filing and case
management system. At this time, permission to do so is denied.
Any further consideration of the substantive issues raised by
plaintiffs, including plaintiffs' requests regarding conflicts
of interest, must await the resolution of anticipated motions to
dismiss. (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 3/21/08) (tro)
(Entered: 03/21/2008)
ORDER all defendants
that seek to move to dismiss must so move and submit memoranda
of law no later than May 30, 2008. Plaintiffs' response is due
on June 30, 2008. Defendants' reply, if any, is due on July 14,
2008. The parties are reminded that the restrictions on page
limits and exhibits detailed in the Court's Individual Rules and
Procedures are in effect, and memoranda of law that do not
comply with these Rules will be rejected. SO ORDERED. (Responses
due by 6/30/2008, Replies due by 7/14/2008.) (Signed by Judge
Shira A. Scheindlin on 3/24/2008) (jmi) (Entered: 03/25/2008)
3/24/2008
15
MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons
and Complaint, served. Proskauer Rose LLP served on 3/18/2008,
answer due 4/7/2008. Service was accepted by Greg Mashberg.
Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I.
Bernstein. (dle) (Entered: 03/25/2008)
3/24/2008
16
MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons
and Complaint, served. Kenneth Rubenstein served on 3/18/2008,
answer due 4/7/2008. Service was accepted by Greg Mashberg.
Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I.
Bernstein. (dle) (Entered: 03/25/2008)
3/24/2008
17
MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons
and Complaint, served. Steven C. Krane (in his official
capacity) served on 3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008; Steven C.
Krane (in his individual capacity) served on 3/18/2008, answer
due 4/7/2008. Service was accepted by Gregg Mashberg. Document
filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein.
(dle) (Entered: 03/25/2008)
3/24/2008
18
MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons
and Complaint, served. Estate of Stephen Kaye served on
3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008. Service was accepted by Gregg
Mashberg. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually);
Eliot I. Bernstein. (dle) (Entered: 03/25/2008)
3/24/2008
20
MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons
and Complaint, served. Mary W. Martelino served on 3/14/2008,
answer due 4/3/2008. Service was accepted by Stephen Hall.
Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I.
Bernstein. (dle) (Entered: 03/25/2008)
3/24/2008
21
MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons
and Complaint, served. Virginia State Bar served on 3/14/2008,
answer due 4/3/2008. Service was accepted by Stephen Hall.
Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I.
Bernstein. (dle) (Entered: 03/25/2008)
3/24/2008
22
MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons
and Complaint, served. Noel Sengel (in her official capacity)
served on 3/14/2008, answer due 4/3/2008; Noel Sengel (in her
individual capacity) served on 3/14/2008, answer due 4/3/2008.
Service was accepted by Stephen Hall. Document filed by Eliot I.
Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein. (dle) (Entered:
03/25/2008)
3/24/2008
23
MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons
and Complaint, served. Andrew H. Goodman (in his official
capacity) served on 3/14/2008, answer due 4/3/2008; Andrew H.
Goodman (in his individual capacity) served on 3/14/2008, answer
due 4/3/2008. Service was accepted by Stephen Hall. Document
filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein.
(dle) (Entered: 03/25/2008)
3/25/2008
19
FILING ERROR - ELECTRONIC FILING IN NON-ECF CASE - NOTICE OF
APPEARANCE by John Walter Fried on behalf of Raymond A. Joao
(Attachments: # 1 Affidavit of Service)(Fried, John) Modified on
3/26/2008 (db). (Entered: 03/25/20
3/25/2008
24
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Monica Anne Connell on behalf of
Catherine O'Hagen Wolfe (in their individual capacity), Paul
Curran (in their official capacity), Paul Curran (in individual
capacity), Martin R. Gold (in his individual capacity), Martin
R. Gold (in their official capacity), Angela M. Mazzarelli (in
her official capacity), Angela M. Mazzarelli (in her individual
capacity), Richard T. Andrias (in his official capacity),
Richard T. Andrias (in his individual capacity), David B. Saxe,
David B. Saxe, David Friedman (in his official capacity), David
Friedman (in his individual capacity), Luiz A. Gonzales (in his
official capacity), Luiz A. Gonzales (in his individual
capacity), Appellate Division Second Department Departmental
Disciplinary Committee, Lawrence DiGiovanna (in his official
capacity), Lawrence DiGiovanna (in his individual capacity),
Diana Maxfield Kearse (in her official capacity), Diana Maxfield
Kearse (in her individual capacity), James E. Peltzer (in his
official capacity), James E. Peltzer (in his individual
capacity), A. Gail Prudenti (in her official capacity), A. Gail
Prudenti (in her individual capacity), Judith S. Kaye, Judith S.
Kaye, State of New York Commission of Investigation, Appellate
Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee,
Lawyers Fund for Client Protection of the State of New York,
Thomas J. Cahill (in his official capacity), Thomas J. Cahill
(in his individual capacity), Joseph Wigley (in his official
capacity), Joseph Wigley (in his individual capacity), Catherine
O'Hagen Wolfe (in their official capacity) (dle) (Entered:
03/26/2008)
3/26/2008
***NOTE TO ATTORNEY TO RE-FILE DOCUMENT - NON-ECF CASE ERROR.
Note to Attorney John Walter Fried to MANUALLY RE-FILE Document
Notice of Appearance, Document No. 19. This case is not ECF.
(db) (Entered: 03/26/2008)
3/26/2008
25
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by John Walter Fried on behalf of Raymond
A. Joao. (jco) (Entered: 03/27/2008)
3/27/2008
26
MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons
and Complaint, served. Michael C. Grebe served on 3/16/2008,
answer due 5/30/2008. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein
(Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein; P. Stephen Lamont. (pl)
(Entered: 03/31/2008)
3/27/2008
27
MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons
and Complaint, served. Lorraine Christine Hoffman (in her
official capacity) served on 3/5/2008, answer due 3/25/2008.
Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I.
Bernstein; P. Stephen Lamont. (pl) (Entered: 03/31/2008)
3/27/2008
28
MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons
and Complaint, served. Judith S. Kaye served on 3/18/2008,
answer due 4/7/2008. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein
(Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein; P. Stephen Lamont. (pl)
(Entered: 03/31/2008)
3/27/2008
29
MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons
and Complaint, served. Lawyers Fund for Client Protection of the
State of New York served on 3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008.
Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I.
Bernstein; P. Stephen Lamont. (pl) (Entered: 03/31/2008)
3/27/2008
30
MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons
and Complaint, served. State of New York Commission of
Investigation served on 3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008. Document
filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein;
P. Stephen Lamont. (pl) (Entered: 03/31/2008)
3/27/2008
31
MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons
and Complaint, served. Paul Curran (in individual capacity)
served on 3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008. Document filed by
Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein; P.
Stephen Lamont. (pl) (Entered: 03/31/2008)
3/27/2008
32
MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons
and Complaint, served. Angela M. Mazzarelli (in her official
capacity) served on 3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008. Document
filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein;
P. Stephen Lamont. (pl) (Entered: 03/31/2008)
3/27/2008
33
MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons
and Complaint, served. James E. Peltzer (in his official
capacity) served on 3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008. Document
filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein;
P. Stephen Lamont. (pl) (Entered: 03/31/2008)
3/27/2008
34
MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons
and Complaint, served. Joseph Wigley (in his official capacity)
served on 3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008. Document filed by
Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein; P.
Stephen Lamont. (pl) (Entered: 03/31/2008)
3/27/2008
35
MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons
and Complaint, served. Catherine O'Hagen Wolfe (in their
official capacity) served on 3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008.
Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I.
Bernstein; P. Stephen Lamont. (pl) (Entered: 03/31/2008)
3/27/2008
36
MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons
and Complaint, served. Richard T. Andrias (in his official
capacity) served on 3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008. Document
filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein;
P. Stephen Lamont. (pl) (Entered: 03/31/2008)
3/27/2008
37
MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons
and Complaint, served. Thomas J. Cahill (in his official
capacity) served on 3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008. Document
filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein;
P. Stephen Lamont. (pl) (Entered: 03/31/2008)
3/27/2008
38
MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons
and Complaint, served. Diana Maxfield Kearse (in her official
capacity) served on 3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008. Document
filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein;
P. Stephen Lamont. (pl) (Entered: 03/31/2008)
3/27/2008
39
MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons
and Complaint, served. A. Gail Prudenti (in her official
capacity) served on 3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008. Document
filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein;
P. Stephen Lamont. (pl) (Entered: 03/31/2008)
3/27/2008
40
MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons
and Complaint, served. Lawrence DiGiovanna (in his official
capacity) served on 3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008. Document
filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein;
P. Stephen Lamont. (pl) (Entered: 03/31/2008)
3/27/2008
41
MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons
and Complaint, served. Appellate Division Second Department
Departmental Disciplinary Committee served on 3/18/2008, answer
due 4/7/2008. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein
(Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein; P. Stephen Lamont. (pl)
(Entered: 03/31/2008)
3/27/2008
42
MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons
and Complaint, served. David Friedman (in his official capacity)
served on 3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008. Document filed by
Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein; P.
Stephen Lamont. (pl) (Entered: 03/31/2008)
3/27/2008
43
MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons
and Complaint, served. Luiz A. Gonzales (in his official
capacity) served on 3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008. Document
filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein;
P. Stephen Lamont. (pl) (Entered: 03/31/2008)
3/27/2008
44
MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons
and Complaint, served. Kenneth Marvin (in his official capacity)
served on 3/17/2008, answer due 4/7/2008. Document filed by
Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein; P.
Stephen Lamont. (pl) (Entered: 03/31/2008)
3/27/2008
45
MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons
and Complaint, served. Appellate Division First Department
Departmental Disciplinary Committee served on 3/18/2008, answer
due 4/7/2008. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein
(Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein; P. Stephen Lamont. (pl)
(Entered: 03/31/2008)
ORDER: The Court has received a document styled "opposition to
Defendants Motion to dismiss." from plaintiffs. This document
was apparently sent directly to Chambers, not to the Courts Pro
Se Office. Because plaintiffs have failed to comply with the
Court's standing order this document is rejected. If plaintiff
seeks to file a motion they must do so through the Court's Pro
SE Office. The time for defendants to move to dismiss is
extended to May 30, 2008, plaintiffs response is due by June 30,
2008 Defendants reply is due July 14, 2008. (Signed by Judge
Shira A. Scheindlin on 4/8/2008) (jpo) (Entered: 04/09/2008 )
04/11/2008
50
MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons
and Complaint, served. Raymond A. Joao served on 3/25/2008,
answer due 5/30/2008. Service was accepted by John W. Fried.
Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I.
Bernstein. (dle) (Entered: 04/11/2008)
04/11/2008
51
MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons
and Complaint, served. William J. Dick served on 3/25/2008,
answer due 5/30/2008. Service was accepted by William J. Dick.
Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I.
Bernstein. (dle) (Entered: 04/11/2008)
04/11/2008
52
MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons
and Complaint, served. Douglas A. Boehm served on 3/24/2008,
answer due 5/30/2008. Service was accepted by Douglas Boehm.
Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I.
Bernstein. (dle) (Entered: 04/11/2008)
04/11/2008
53
MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons
and Complaint, served. Steven C. Becker served on 3/24/2008,
answer due 5/30/2008. Service was accepted by Steven Becker.
Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I.
Bernstein. (dle) (Entered: 04/11/2008)
04/11/2008
54
MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons
and Complaint, served. Foley Lardner LLP served on 3/20/2008,
answer due 5/30/2008. Service was accepted by James R. Clark.
Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I.
Bernstein. (dle) (Entered: 04/11/2008)
CASHIERS OFFICE REMARK on 56 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, in
the amount of $25.00, paid on 04/24/2008, Receipt Number 649058.
(jd) (Entered: 04/29/2008)
DECLARATION of Kent K. Anker RESPONSE to Plaintiffs' Motion for
Pro Bono Counsel. Document filed by Foley Lardner LLP, Michael
C. Grebe, William J. Dick, Douglas A. Boehm, Steven C. Becker.
(jmi) (Entered: 05/05/2008)
05/02/2008
58
RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent.
Document filed by Foley Lardner LLP, Michael C. Grebe, William
J. Dick, Douglas A. Boehm, Steven C. Becker. (jmi) (Entered:
05/05/2008)
05/02/2008
59
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Lili Zandpour, Kent Kari Anker on behalf
of Foley Lardner LLP, Michael C. Grebe, William J. Dick, Douglas
A. Boehm, Steven C. Becker (jmi) (Entered: 05/05/2008)
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Joanna Frances Smith on behalf of Steven
C. Krane (in his individual capacity), Kenneth Rubenstein,
Proskauer Rose LLP (pl) (Entered: 05/13/2008)
MOTION for an order pursuant to F.R.C.P. 12(b)(2) and (6) to
Dismiss the Amended Complaint; w/ attch. Declaration in support.
Document filed by Lorraine Christine Hoffman (in her official
capacity), Eric Turner (in his official capacity), John Anthony
Boggs (in his official capacity), Kenneth Marvin (in his
official capacity). (pl) (Entered: 05/30/2008)
05/30/2008
69
MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 68 MOTION to Dismiss.. Document
filed by Lorraine Christine Hoffman (in her official capacity),
John Anthony Boggs (in his official capacity), Kenneth Marvin
(in his official capacity, et al. (pl) (Entered: 05/30/2008)
05/30/2008
70
FILING ERROR - ELECTRONIC FILING IN NON-ECF CASE - CROSS MOTION
to Dismiss Complaint. Document filed by Meltzer Lippe Goldstein
& Breistone LLP, Lewis S. Meltzer. (Howard, Richard) Modified on
6/2/2008 (KA). (Entered: 05/30/2008)
FILING ERROR - ELECTRONIC FILING IN NON-ECF CASE - AFFIDAVIT of
Richard M. Howard, Esq. in Support re: 70 CROSS MOTION to
Dismiss Complaint. Document filed by Meltzer Lippe Goldstein &
Breistone LLP, Lewis S. Meltzer. (Howard, Richard) Modified on
6/2/2008 (KA). (Entered: 05/30/2008)
FILING ERROR - ELECTRONIC FILING IN NON-ECF CASE - AFFIDAVIT OF
SERVICE of Notice of Cross Motion with Affidavit in Support
served on Elliot I. Bernstein, P. Stephen Lamont, Monica
Connell, Esq., Gregg M. Mashberg, Esq., Glenn T. Burhans, Jr.,
Esq., John W. Fried, Esq. on May 30, 2008. Service was made by
Mail. Document filed by Meltzer Lippe Goldstein & Breistone LLP,
Lewis S. Meltzer. (Howard, Richard) Modified on 6/2/2008 (KA).
(Entered: 05/30/2008)
MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 75 MOTION to Dismiss. Document
filed by Raymond A. Joao. (pl) (Entered: 06/02/2008)
05/30/2008
77
DECLARATION of John W. Fried in Support re: 75 MOTION to
Dismiss.. Document filed by Raymond A. Joao. (pl) (Entered:
06/02/2008)
05/30/2008
78
MOTION to Dismiss the Complaint and Amended Complaint, with
prejudice. Document filed by Steven C. Krane (in his individual
capacity), Kenneth Rubenstein, Estate of Stephen Kaye, Proskauer
Rose LLP. (cd) (Entered: 06/02/2008)
05/30/2008
79
DECLARATION of Joanna Smith in Support re: 78 MOTION to Dismiss.
Document filed by Steven C. Krane (in his official capacity),
Kenneth Rubenstein, Estate of Stephen Kaye, Proskauer Rose LLP.
(cd) (Entered: 06/02/2008)
05/30/2008
80
MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 78 MOTION to Dismiss. Document
filed by Steven C. Krane (in his individual capacity), Kenneth
Rubenstein, Estate of Stephen Kaye, Proskauer Rose LLP. (cd)
(Entered: 06/02/2008)
05/30/2008
81
MOTION for an order pursuant to F.R.C.P. 9(b) and 12(b)(b)
dismissing the original and amended complaints. Document filed
by Foley Lardner LLP, Michael C. Grebe, William J. Dick, Douglas
A. Boehm, Steven C. Becker.(pl) (Entered: 06/02/2008)
05/30/2008
82
DECLARATION of Lili Zandpour in Support re: 81 MOTION to
Dismiss.. Document filed by Foley Lardner LLP, Michael C. Grebe,
William J. Dick, Douglas A. Boehm, Steven C. Becker. (pl)
(Entered: 06/02/2008)
***NOTE TO ATTORNEY TO RE-FILE DOCUMENT - NON-ECF CASE ERROR.
Note to Attorney Richard M. Howard to MANUALLY RE-FILE Document
Cross-Motion to Dismiss Complaint, Document No. 70. This case is
not ECF. (KA) (Entered: 06/02/2008)
06/02/2008
***NOTE TO ATTORNEY TO RE-FILE DOCUMENT - NON-ECF CASE ERROR.
Note to Attorney Richard M. Howard to MANUALLY RE-FILE Document
Affidavit in Support of Motion, Document No. 71. This case is
not ECF. (KA) (Entered: 06/02/2008)
06/02/2008
***NOTE TO ATTORNEY TO RE-FILE DOCUMENT - NON-ECF CASE ERROR.
Note to Attorney Richard M. Howard to MANUALLY RE-FILE Document
Affidavit of Service, Document No. 72. This case is not ECF.
(KA) (Entered: 06/02/2008)
CROSS-MOTION to Dismiss plaintiffs' complaint purs to FRCP Rule
12(b)(6). Attached is Affidavit. Document filed by Meltzer Lippe
Goldstein & Breistone LLP, Lewis S. Meltzer. (djc) Modified on
6/5/2008 (djc). (Entered: 06/05/2008)
Note out of order and not part of this case but related
Esposito case
DECLARATION OF SERVICE of Motion to dismiss dated 5/30/08, the
Declaration of Monica A. Connell and State Defendants Memorandum
in support of Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint served on
Pro Se Plaintiff, Attorneys for Harvey Gladstein & Partners,
Attorneys for Alan Isaac, and Attorneys for the City defendants
on 5/30/08. Service was made by Federal Express. [this looks
like entry from a related case but the following text is from
this case and Hoffman is not involved in other case???] Document
filed by Lorraine Christine Hoffman (in her individual
capacity). (pl) Modified on 6/10/2008 (pl). (Entered:
06/10/2008)
06/16/2008
WRONG CASE, ENTERS MY
CASE INFO INTO ANDERSON DOCKET
MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons
and Amended Complaint served. Thomas Hall (in his individual
capacity) served on 6/6/2008, answer due 6/26/2008. Service was
accepted by Vickie Vanlith, Administrative Assistant. Document
filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually). (pl) (Entered:
07/07/2008)
07/07/2008
89
MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons
and Amended Complaint served. The Florida Bar served on
6/6/2008, answer due 6/26/2008. Service was accepted by Jack
Harkness-Executive Director. Document filed by Eliot I.
Bernstein (Individually). (pl) (Entered: 07/07/2008)
MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED
Summons and Amended Complaint, served. Appellate Division First
Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee served on
6/19/2008, answer due 7/9/2008. Service was accepted by Tom
McGowan. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually);
Eliot I. Bernstein; P. Stephen Lamont. (jpo) (Entered:
07/21/2008)
07/16/2008
100
MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons
and Amended Complaint served. Meltzer Lippe Goldstein &
Breistone LLP served on 6/19/2008, answer due 7/9/2008. Service
was accepted by Tom McGowan. Document filed by Eliot I.
Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein. (tro) (Entered:
07/21/2008)
REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW ON BEHALF of Defendants Lewis and MLGB
Document filed by Meltzer Lippe Goldstein & Breistone LLP, Lewis
S. Meltzer. (djc) (Entered: 07/25/2008)
07/28/2008
102
REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 75 MOTION to Dismiss..
Document filed by Raymond A. Joao. (pl) (Entered: 07/29/2008)
07/28/2008
103
REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 81 MOTION to Dismiss..
Document filed by Foley Lardner LLP, Michael C. Grebe, William
J. Dick, Douglas A. Boehm, Steven C. Becker. (pl) (Entered:
07/29/2008)
07/28/2008
104
SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION of Joanna Smith in Support re: 78
MOTION to Dismiss. Document filed by Steven C. Krane (in his
official capacity), Kenneth Rubenstein. (pl) (Entered:
07/29/2008)
07/28/2008
105
REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 78 MOTION to Dismiss..
Document filed by Steven C. Krane (in his official capacity),
Kenneth Rubenstein. (pl) (Entered: 07/29/2008)
MOTION for
Reconsideration and Modification of the Court's August 8,2008
re; 107 Memorandum & Opinion. Document filed by Eliot I.
Bernstein (Individually), Eliot I. Bernstein. (jmi) (Entered:
09/11/2008)
09/04/2008
112
NOTICE OF APPEAL from
107 Memorandum & Opinion. Document filed by P. Stephen Lamont.
Filing fee $ 455.00, receipt number E 662193. Copies mailed to
attorney(s) of record: Attorney General, NYS. (tp) (Entered:
09/30/2008)
Appeal Record Sent to
USCA (File). Indexed record on Appeal Files for 111 Notice of
Appeal filed by Eliot I. Bernstein were transmitted to the U.S.
Court of Appeals. (Total of 4 volumes sent to USCA on
10/3/2008). (nd) (Entered: 10/02/2008)
Appeal Record Sent to
USCA (File). Indexed record on Appeal Files for 112 Notice of
Appeal filed by P. Stephen Lamont were transmitted to the U.S.
Court of Appeals. (nd) (Entered: 10/02/2008)
10/08/2008
USCA Case Number
08-4873-cv from the US Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit assigned to
112 Notice of Appeal filed by P. Stephen Lamont. (nd) (Entered:
10/08/2008)
New First Department Attorney Ethics Complaints filed against
Proskauer Rose, LLP, Foley and Lardner, Gregg M. Mashberg of
Proskauer, Joanna F. Smith of Proskauer, Todd C. Norbitz of
Foley and Lardner and Anne B. Sekel of Foley and Lardner.
Second Circuit Court of
Appeals
INDIV
OPEN
Court of Appeals Docket #: 08-4873-cv
Nsuit : 3470 STATUTES-RICOH
Bernstein v. Appellate Division First Filed 10/3/08
Department Disciplinary Committee
Appeal SDNY (NEW YORK CITY)
from:
Case type information:
Civil
Private
None
Lower court information:
District: 07-cv-11196
Trial Judge: Shira A. Scheindlin
MagJudge:
Date Filed: 12/12/07
Date order/judgement: 8/8/2008
Date NOA filed: 9/5/2008
Fee status: Paid
Panel Assignment:
Panel:
Date of decision:
Prior cases: NONE
Current cases NONE
Official Caption 1/
INDIV
OPEN
--------------------------------------
Docket No. [s] : 08-4873 -cv
Eliot I. Bernstein, individually, P. Stephen Lamont, on
behalf of Shareholders of Iviweit Holdings, Inc.,
Iviewit Technologies, Inc., Uview.com, Inc., Iviewit.com,
Inc., I.C., Inc., Iviewit.com LLC, Iviewit LLC, Iviewit
Corporation, Iviewit, Inc., and Patent Interest Holders,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Appellate Division First Department Departmental,
Thomas J. Cahill, in his official capacity, in his
individual capacity, Joseph Wigely, in his official
capacity, in his individual capacity, Catherine O`Hagan
Wolfe, in their officical capacity, in their individual
capacity, Paul Curran, in their official capacity, in
thier individual capacity, Martin R. Gold, in his
individual capacity, in their official capacity, Angela
M Mazzarelli, in her official capacity, in their oficial
capacity, Richard T. Andrias, in his official capacity,
in their official capacity, David B. Saxe, in his
official capacity, in their individual capacity, David
Friedman, in his official capacity, in their individual
capacity, Luis A. Gonzales, in his official capacity,
in their individual capacity, Appellate Division Second
Department Departmenta, Lawrence F. DiGiovanna, in his
official capacity, in their individual capacity, Diana
Maxfield Kearse, in his official capacity, in their
individual capacity, James E. Peltzer, in his official
capacity, in their individual capacity, A. Gail
Prudenti, in his official capacity, in their individual
capacity, Steven C. Krane, in his official capacity, in
their individual capacity, Hon. Judith S. Kaye, in his
official capacity, in their individual capacity,
Kenneth Rubenstein, Estate of Stephen Kaye, Proskauer
Rose LLP, Meltzer Lippe Goldstein & Breistone LLP,
Lewis S. Meltzer, Raymond A. Joao, Foley Lardner LLP,
Michael C. Grebe, William J. Dick, Douglas A. Boehm,
Steven C. Becker, State of New York Commission of
Investigation, Lawyers Fund for Client Protection of
the State, The Florida Bar, Lorraine Christine Hoffman,
in her official capacity, in her individual capacity,
Eric Turner, in her official capacity, in her
individual capacity, John Anthony Boggs, in her
official capacity, in her individual capacity, Kenneth
Marvin, in her official capacity, in her individual
capacity, Thomas Hall, in her official capacity, in
her individual capacity, Deborah Yarborough, Virginia
State Bar, Andrew H. Goodman, in his officail capacity,
in his individual capacity, Noel Sengel, in his
officail capacity, in his individual capacity, Mary W.
Martelino, in her individual capacity, John Does,
Defendants-Appellees.
--------------------------------------
Authorized Abbreviated Caption 2/
--------------------------------------
Docket No. [s] : 08-4873 -cv
Bernstein v. Appellate Division First Department
Disciplinary Committee
Docket as of February 06, 2009 3:05 am Page 2
INDIV
OPEN
--------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------
-----------------
1/ Fed. R. App. P. Rule 12 [a] and 32 [a].
2/ For use on correspondence and motions only.
Docket as of February 06, 2009 3:05 am Page 3
INDIV
OPEN
Deborah Yarborough
Defendant-Appellee
John Does
Defendant-Appellee
The Florida Bar
Defendant-Appellee
Thomas Hall
Defendant-Appellee
Eliot I. Bernstein Eliot I. Bernstein
Plaintiff-Appellant n/a
2753 Northwest 34th Street
Boca Raton , FL , 33434
561-245-8588
Docket as of February 06, 2009 3:05 am Page 4
INDIV
OPEN
Estate of Stephen Kaye Joanna Frances Smith Esq.
Defendant-Appellee [ LD n ]
Proskauer Rose LLP
1585 Broadway
New York , NY , 10036
212-969-3437
Kenneth Rubenstein Joanna Frances Smith Esq.(See
above)
Defendant-Appellee [ LD n ]
Proskauer Rose LLP Joanna Frances Smith Esq.(See
above)
Defendant-Appellee [ LD n ]
Steven C. Krane Joanna Frances Smith Esq.(See
above)
Defendant-Appellee [ LD n ]
Raymond A. Joao John W. Fried Esq.
Defendant-Appellee [ LD n ]
Fried & Epstein LLP
1350 Broadway
New York , NY , 10018
212-268-7111
Docket as of February 06, 2009 3:05 am Page 5
INDIV
OPEN
Douglas A. Boehm Kent K. Anker Esq.
Defendant-Appellee [ LD n ]
Friedman Kaplan Seiler &
Adelman LLP
1633 Broadway
New York , NY , 10019
212-833-1100
Foley Lardner LLP Kent K. Anker Esq.(See above)
Defendant-Appellee [ LD n ]
Michael C. Grebe Kent K. Anker Esq.(See above)
Defendant-Appellee [ LD n ]
Steven C. Becker Kent K. Anker Esq.(See above)
Defendant-Appellee [ LD n ]
William J. Dick Kent K. Anker Esq.(See above)
Defendant-Appellee [ LD n ]
A. Gail Prudenti Monica Anne Connell Esq.
Docket as of February 06, 2009 3:05 am Page 6
INDIV
OPEN
Defendant-Appellee [ LD n ]
Attorney General of the State
of New York
120 Broadway
New York , NY , 10271
212-416-8965
Andrew H. Goodman Monica Anne Connell Esq.(See
above)
Defendant-Appellee [ LD n ]
Angela M Mazzarelli Monica Anne Connell Esq.(See
above)
Defendant-Appellee [ LD n ]
Appellate Division First Monica Anne Connell Esq.(See
Department Departmental above)
Defendant-Appellee [ LD n ]
Appellate Division Second Monica Anne Connell Esq.(See
Department Departmental above)
Defendant-Appellee [ LD n ]
Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe Monica Anne Connell Esq.(See
above)
Defendant-Appellee [ LD n ]
David Friedman Monica Anne Connell Esq.(See
above)
Defendant-Appellee [ LD n ]
Docket as of February 06, 2009 3:05 am Page 7
INDIV
OPEN
David B. Saxe Monica Anne Connell Esq.(See
above)
Defendant-Appellee [ LD n ]
Diana Maxfield Kearse Monica Anne Connell Esq.(See
above)
Defendant-Appellee [ LD n ]
Eric Turner Monica Anne Connell Esq.(See
above)
Defendant-Appellee [ LD n ]
Hon. Judith S. Kaye Monica Anne Connell Esq.(See
above)
Defendant-Appellee [ LD n ]
James E. Peltzer Monica Anne Connell Esq.(See
above)
Defendant-Appellee [ LD n ]
John Anthony Boggs Monica Anne Connell Esq.(See
above)
Defendant-Appellee [ LD n ]
Docket as of February 06, 2009 3:05 am Page 8
INDIV
OPEN
Joseph Wigely Monica Anne Connell Esq.(See
above)
Defendant-Appellee [ LD n ]
Kenneth Marvin Monica Anne Connell Esq.(See
above)
Defendant-Appellee [ LD n ]
Lawrence F. DiGiovanna Monica Anne Connell Esq.(See
above)
Defendant-Appellee [ LD n ]
Lawyers Fund for Client Monica Anne Connell Esq.(See
Protection of the State of above)
Defendant-Appellee [ LD n ]
Lorraine Christine Hoffman Monica Anne Connell Esq.(See
above)
Defendant-Appellee [ LD n ]
Luis A. Gonzales Monica Anne Connell Esq.(See
above)
Defendant-Appellee [ LD n ]
Martin R. Gold Monica Anne Connell Esq.(See
above)
Defendant-Appellee [ LD n ]
Docket as of February 06, 2009 3:05 am Page 9
INDIV
OPEN
Mary W. Martelino Monica Anne Connell Esq.(See
above)
Defendant-Appellee [ LD n ]
Noel Sengel Monica Anne Connell Esq.(See
above)
Defendant-Appellee [ LD n ]
Paul Curran Monica Anne Connell Esq.(See
above)
Defendant-Appellee [ LD n ]
Richard T. Andrias Monica Anne Connell Esq.(See
above)
Defendant-Appellee [ LD n ]
State of New York Commission Monica Anne Connell Esq.(See
of Investigation above)
Defendant-Appellee [ LD n ]
Thomas J. Cahill Monica Anne Connell Esq.(See
above)
Defendant-Appellee [ LD n ]
Virginia State Bar Monica Anne Connell Esq.(See
Docket as of February 06, 2009 3:05 am Page 10
INDIV
OPEN
above)
Defendant-Appellee [ LD n ]
P. Stephen Lamont P. Stephen Lamont
Plaintiff-Appellant n/a
35 Locust Avenue
Rye , NY , 10580
914-217-0038
Appellate Division First Patrick J. Walsh Esq.
Department Departmental
Defendant-Appellee [ n ]
U.S. Attorney Generals Office,
State of New York
120 Broadway
New York , NY , 10007
212-416-6197
Lewis S. Meltzer Richard M. Howard Esq.
Defendant-Appellee [ LD n ]
Law Offices of Richard M. Howard
190 Willis Avenue
Mineola , NY , 11501
516-747-0300
Meltzer Lippe Goldstein & Richard M. Howard Esq.(See
Breistone LLP above)
Defendant-Appellee [ LD n ]
Docket as of February 06, 2009 3:05 am Page 11
INDIV
OPEN
Docket as of February 06, 2009 3:05 am Page 12
INDIV
OPEN
10/3/08 APPELLANT Eliot Bernstein, P. Lamont,
Copy of notice of appeal and district court
docket entries on behalf of APPELLANT
Eliot Bernstein, P. Lamont, filed.
[Entry date Oct 6 2008 ] [AJ]
10/3/08 Note: This appeal was PRO SE when filed.
[Entry date Oct 6 2008 ] [AJ]
10/3/08 Copy of receipt re: payment of docketing fee
filed on behalf of APPELLANT Eliot
Bernstein, P. Lamont, .RECEIPT #662193
[Entry date Oct 6 2008 ] [AJ]
10/3/08 Copy of district court order dated 08/08/08
RECEIVED. [Entry date Oct 6 2008 ] [AJ]
10/3/08 Record on appeal filed. (Original papers of
district court.) Volume(4) [Entry date
Oct 6 2008 ] [AJ]
10/6/08 Instructional Forms sent to Pro Se litigant
[Entry date Oct 6 2008 ] [AJ]
12/31/08 Letter dated December 5, 2008 from Attorney
John W. Fried, informing the Court of his
change of address, received. [Entry date
Dec 31 2008 ] [DH]
12/31/08 Request for address change for John W.
Fried, Esq. new address: Fried & Epstein
LLP, Empire State Building, 350 Fifth Avenue,
Ste. 7612, New York, NY 10018..
1/30/09 Appellant Eliot Bernstein motion for stay
of appeal, conflicts, dockting and other
erors and requests, filed with proof of
service. [Entry date Feb 18 2009 ] [DH]
2/6/09 Notice to counsel/pro se re: Motion Order
dated 2/6/09. [Entry date Feb 6 2009 ]
[DH]
Docket as of March 13, 2009 3:57 am Page 16
(Virginia Defendants-Appellees), LETTER
BRIEF filed with proof of service. [Entry
date Feb 27 2009 ] [DH]
2/27/09 APPELLANT Eliot Bernstein, brief RECEIVED.
[Entry date Mar 4 2009 ] [DH]
3/2/09 APPELLANT Eliot Bernstein, motion
received. Hard copies being forwarded by
appellant. [Entry date Mar 6 2009 ] [DH]
3/3/09 Notice of Appearance Filed by Eliot
Bernstein on behalf of himself. (Orig in
acco, copy to Calendar and Admissions Dept.).
[Entry date Mar 5 2009 ] [DH]
3/4/09 Notice of Appearance Filed by Kent Anker
on behalf of Foley & Lardner LLP, Steven C.
Becker, Douglas A. Boehm, William J. Dick
and Michael W. Grebe. (Orig in acco, copy to
Calendar and Admissions Dept.). [Entry
date Mar 5 2009 ] [DH]
3/5/09 Notice of Appearance Filed by Gregg
Mashberg on behalf of Proskauer Rose LLP,
Kenneth Rubenstein, Steven C. Krane and the
Estate of Stephen Rackow Kaye. (Orig in acco,
copy to Calendar and Admissions Dept.).
[Entry date Mar 5 2009 ] [DH]
3/6/09 Appellant Eliot Bernstein motion for
Emergency investigation of Proskauer Rose
Defendants involvement in the Allen Stanford
financial... filed with proof of service.
[Entry date Mar 6 2009 ] [DH]
3/9/09 APPELLANT Eliot Bernstein, brief RECEIVED.
[Entry date Mar 10 2009 ] [DH]
3/9/09 Appellee's papers in opposition to
Appellant's motion for Emergency relief,
filed with proof of service. [Entry date
Mar 9 2009 ] [DH]
3/10/09 APPELLANT Eliot Bernstein, defective
filed. Notice sent to
party to correct by 3/16/09. [Entry date
Mar 10 2009 ] [DH]
3/10/09 Instructional Forms sent to Pro Se litigant
[Entry date Mar 10 2009 ] [DH]
3/10/09 Notice to counsel/pro se re: Motion Order
dated 3/10/09. [Entry date Mar 10 2009 ]
[DH]
3/10/09 Order FILED DENYING motion for Emergency to
investigate the involvement of Proskauer
Rose by Appellant Eliot Bernstein, endorsed
on motion dated 3/6/2009. IT IS HEREBY
ORDERED that the emergency motion by pro se
Appellant Bernstein to investigate the
involvement of Proskauer Rose in recent
financial scandals and for other relief is
DENIED. Before: DAL, CJ. Endorsed for the
Court by JF, Administrative Attorney.
[Entry date Mar 10 2009 ] [DH]
3/11/09 Notice of Appearance Filed by John Fried
on behalf of Raymond A. Joao. (Orig in acco,
copy to Calendar and Admissions Dept.).
[Entry date Mar 12 2009 ] [DH]
Docket as of March 13, 2009 3:57 am Page 18
Complaints Against 'Select
Attorneys' Whitewashed, N.Y. Lawsuit Alleges
Daniel Wise
New York Law Journal
10-30-2007
A former staff attorney at the 1st Department Disciplinary Committee
has filed a federal lawsuit charging she was fired
in June in retaliation for complaining that her
superiors had engaged in a "pattern and practice of
whitewashing and routinely dismissing complaints
against certain select attorneys."
Christine C. Anderson, who had worked for six
years at the disciplinary committee, seeks $10
million in damages, claiming retaliation for the
exercise of her First Amendment rights and
discrimination because she is of Jamaican origin and
black.
Anderson also asks for the appointment of a
federal monitor to oversee operation of the
disciplinary committee.
David Bookstaver, a spokesman for the Office of
Court Administration, said it would be
"inappropriate" to comment on pending litigation.
Anderson alleged two instances in which her
recommendations had been overridden or changed by
her superiors at the committee.
In 2005, Anderson charged in her complaint, she
discovered that the chief counsel of the
disciplinary committee, Thomas J. Cahill, and Sherry
K. Cohen, its first deputy counsel, were "apparently
engaged in a 'numbers game' and practice" of
"selectively" dismissing complaints against
attorneys for their "own personal and political
reasons."
A possible second, or alternative reason for the
dismissals, the complaint stated, was that the
prosecutions of the complaints would be "burdensome
or otherwise 'unworthy' of prosecution."
Anderson also charged that in one incident, in
July 2006, Cohen physically blocked her from leaving
her office and, in so doing, had dug her nails into
the plaintiff's hand, causing scratches.
Cahill declined to comment on the allegations;
Cohen did not return a call for comment.
In addition to suing Cahill and Cohen, Anderson
named as defendants Justice John T. Buckley, who was
presiding justice of the Appellate Division, 1st
Department, until May; former Clerk of Court
Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe, who resigned in April to
become clerk of the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of
Appeals; and the Office of Court Administration.
The case, Anderson v. State of New York,
was filed on Friday in the Southern District of New
York, according to Anderson's attorney, Frederick K.
Brewington of Hempstead, N.Y.
Cahill's retirement was announced in July, though
he is remaining as chief counsel until a successor
is chosen.
The first instance of a "whitewash" alleged in
Anderson's complaint occurred "in or about 2003" in
"a highly sensitive investigation," which had
uncovered "overwhelming concrete evidence of
misconduct" by an attorney, Anderson alleged.
The matter was dropped despite her recommendation
that a formal complaint be filed against the lawyer,
Anderson alleged.
She also charged that a large file she had
amassed containing "indisputable evidence of
misconduct" had been "gutted."
The second instance in which Anderson's handling
of a case was overridden occurred about two years
later, she alleged.
In that case, she stated, Cahill had asked her to
write an introductory paragraph to the policy
committee, explaining her recommendation that an
attorney be given a non-public admonition rather
than be the subject of a formal proceeding that
could lead to a public sanction.
Anderson explained in her complaint, that,
although the results of a "complex investigation" of
the attorney "argued strongly in favor of charges,"
there was "lack of actual proof of a conversion."
She also stated there had been an "initial lack of
cooperation" from the client complaining against the
lawyer.
Anderson stated that she wrote an introductory
paragraph explaining the gravity of the attorney's
conduct, but that Cohen had rewritten it, "deleting
facts" Anderson had uncovered during her
investigation and conclusions she had reached.
Anderson quoted Cohen as saying the reason she
had rewritten the paragraph was to avoid having the
policy committee send the matter back to staff for
the preparation of a formal complaint.
Anderson further charged that Cohen had done this
because "she had a prior working relationship" with
the attorney for the lawyer under investigation and
sought to avoid having his client formally charged
"as a favor."
The complaint did not identify the two lawyers
who were the subjects of the proceedings cited by
Anderson. Brewington said in an interview that he
would not name them "at this time."
A former lawyer for the state court system, fired in June from her
job investigating lawyers charged with misconduct, has charged in a
federal lawsuit that supervisors “whitewashed” some cases for
“personal or political reasons.”
The lawyer, Christine C. Anderson, who was a staff attorney for
six years in a Departmental Disciplinary Committee of the State
Supreme Court’s Appellate Division in Manhattan, did not name the
lawyers who she said received such protection. But she said her
supervisors, who were named, intervened on behalf of lawyers against
whom she had found “overwhelming concrete evidence of misconduct.”
The lawsuit, filed last week in the United States District Court
for the Southern District, charges that Ms. Anderson was fired
because she openly voiced her concerns about “a pattern and practice
of whitewashing and routinely dismissing complaints leveled against
certain select attorneys.” Ms. Anderson, 62, who is black, also said
she was a victim of age and race discrimination.
Disciplinary committees operate in each of the state’s four
Appellate Division departments to investigate lawyers accused of
misconduct. Charges can vary from unresponsiveness toward clients,
to the theft of money from escrow accounts, to failure to disclose
conflicts of interest. Based on investigations by staff attorneys
like Ms. Anderson, committees can admonish lawyers, suspend or
revoke their licenses or recommend criminal prosecution.
In the suit, Ms. Anderson, who worked in the First Department,
covering the Bronx and Manhattan, named as defendants Thomas J.
Cahill, chief counsel of the Departmental Disciplinary Committee;
his first deputy, Sherry K. Cohen; Catherine O’Hagan Wolfe, the
court clerk; David Spokiny, her deputy; and John Buckley, the
presiding justice of the Office of Court Administration.
None could be reached for comment. David Bookstaver, a spokesman
for the state court system, said it would be “inappropriate to
comment.”
Fred K. Brewington, the Long Island lawyer representing Ms.
Anderson, said she had been harassed on the job continuously,
beginning in 2005, after she raised questions about Ms. Cohen’s
relationship with a lawyer representing another lawyer who was under
review. Despite strong evidence of misconduct by the lawyer in that
case, he said, the complaint was dismissed and a file containing Ms.
Anderson’s investigation disappeared.
Ms. Anderson is seeking $10 million in damages, as well as
punitive damages and lawyer’s fees for what her suit described as
the “irreparable injury,” “mental anguish and humiliation” of being
fired without cause.
Correction: November 7, 2007
An article on Thursday about a lawsuit alleging that a former
lawyer for the
New
York State court system was fired for accusing her
superiors of unethical conduct misstated the jurisdiction of the
First Department of the Appellate Division of State Supreme Court.
It covers the Bronx and Manhattan, not “most of New York
City and Westchester.”
AEAE HONORS Eliot I. Bernstein and P. Stephen Lamont
CHICAGO-- THE AMERICANS FOR THE ENFORCEMENT OF ATTORNEY ETHICS (AEAE) A
CHICAGO BASED ATTORNEY ETHICS "WATCH DOG" GROUP THAT HAS FOR OVER 25
YEARS ADVOCATED THE STRICT ENFORCEMENT OF ATTORNEY ETHICS today honors
Eliot I. Bernstein and P. Stephen Lamont. Bernstein and Lamont were not
afraid to speak "truth to power" in the fine AEAE tradition. As a result
of being victims of one of the grossest violation of the ethics laws for
Intellectual Property ever committed by unethical lawyers and judges. It
is alleged that attorneys positioned in key government posts, blocked
the complaints filed against them, including the USPTO. Harry Moatz
Director of the Office of Enrollment and Discipline it is alleged
"suspended" IP investigations. Mr. Bernstein and Mr. Lamont has filed
one of the "strongest" complaints that AEAE has ever seen in over 25
years against over 25 defendants, lawyers, judges, bar associations et
al.,
The case # 1:2007cv11196 filed 12/12/2007 was listed as cause 1961 RICO
cause of action filed in the Southern District of New York. See also www.iviewit.tv
. Mr. Bernstein is the
Founder & Inventor of Viewed Technologies, Inc..iviewit@iviewit.tv
http://www.livevideo.com/video/7237D54BB12B4D07A3DBEEED6E6953A5/iviewit-technologies-inventor-.aspx
LEO
STOLLER ~ LEGAL ETHICS AND TRADEMARK EXPERT, DIRECTOR OF
AMERICANS FOR THE ENFORCEMENT OF ATTORNEY ETHICS (AEAE)
On Thursday, January 10, 2008, U.S.
Federal District Court Judge Shira
A. Scheindlin directed that the 1.5
Billion dollar Iviewit
“patentgate” case, filed in
the U.S. District Court for the
Southern District of New York on
December 12, 2007, be assigned to
her court.
Judge Scheindlin accepted the
Iviewit lawsuit,
Bernstein v. Appellate Division
First Department Departmental
Disciplinary Committee,
as related to the pending New York
attorney ethics scandal case,
Anderson v. The State of New York.
Allegations of covering-up and
whitewashing complaints against
favored attorneys find both
cases seeking the appointment of
a federal monitor to take over
New York’s statewide attorney
ethics committees. A third
lawsuit, filed December 28,
2007, is currently under review
by Judge Scheindlin to be
designated as an associated case
in the state ethics scandal,
Tammany Hall II.
Federal Magistrate Judge Douglas
F. Eaton has also been assigned
to both the Anderson and Iviewit
matters.
In another order, signed
January 9, 2008, Judge
Scheindlin directed U.S.
Marshals to serve the
Iviewit lawsuit on the
listed defendants.
This should
make the DDC and OCA sweat more than
they have been...this is the big
push needed for invasion into the
operation of the NY STATE OFFICE OF
COURT ADMINISTRATION and their
operations for at least the past 17
yrs...the DE-KAYE reign! God, this
is a blessing for all NY STATE
TAXPAYERS AND VICTIMS OF THE
FRAUDULENT CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR OF the
most sacred of government entities
in this country...the COURT SYSTEM!
I pray that
you're right. The whole system has
been Teflon coated for so long, most
of us (read: victims) gave up hope a
long time ago, and are waiting in
the wings dreaming of vindication.
"Life being what it is, one dreams
of revenge."
- Paul Gauguin
No one is
invincible or that well
protected..opportunities eventually
find one person that can originate
the fall...Rome remembers!
Thugs that flip from law enforcers
to criminals cannot psychologically
perfect the two!
I too filed
complaints against attorneys in the
1st Dept., the result being that
Thomas Cahill double talked me. I
always wonder why, what was going
on. Now I can understand a little.
It was all corrupt, the fix was in.
As a direct result I gave up and
never filed a complaint against the
Surrogage Judge which I should have
done. I will try to join this law
suit also. God Bless Judge
Scheindlin
How
complaints against attorneys or law
firms were buried over the years?
One can only guess at how many
complaints against Judges received
the same fare.
Tammany Hall II, Public
Corruption Scandal Grows – by $1.5
Billion
A federal court-ordered hearing in
the New York State Ethics Scandal
Case (Anderson v. State of New
York 07cv 9599) was held in
Courtroom 15C of the United States
Courthouse at 500 Pearl Street in
Manhattan on Wednesday, December 12,
2007 before U.S. District Court
Judge Shira A. Scheindlin.
Numerous reports confirm the
hearing quickly turned
extraordinary.
Federal Judge Scheindlin first read
into the record a list of 8
different people from around the
world who had copied the court on
various correspondence concerning
the New York Ethics Scandal and
their support for the appointment of
a federal monitor.
An author of one of the letters, P.
Stephen Lamont of Iviewit,
immediately advised the court that
he was withdrawing his copying of
his letter to the court in light of
an associated federal complaint
filed shortly before the hearing.
A court law clerk then handed Judge
Scheindlin a copy of the just-filed
complaint, Bernstein v. 1st
Dept. Disciplinary Committee, et al.
(S.D.N.Y 07cv 11196, filed
December 12, 2007)
The $1.5 Billion Dollar Bernstein
complaint alleges widespread public
corruption in the handling of ethics
complaints involving fraud and
stolen U.S Patents by various New
York law firms and attorneys. The
action by Bernstein has been marked
as an associated case to the
Anderson lawsuit since both
matters concern allegations of
Ethics Committee Public Corruption
and, additionally, both cases seek
the appointment of a federal monitor
over New York State ethics
committees.
Bernstein’s allegations, and known
as "Patentgate" are currently under
review by numerous U.S. Senators,
the U.S. Congress, the United States
Patent and Trademark Office and the
FBI’s watchdog unit, the Office of
Professional Responsibility in
Washington, D.C.
The defense counsel in the
Anderson matter, a Lee Alan
Adlerstein from the New York State
Attorney General’s office, attempted
to categorize the Anderson case as a
simple wrongful termination action,
but the Judge did not see it that
way-- and said so.
“This case is not a garden
variety…it’s a whistleblower…there
is that aspect to it…," said Judge
Scheindlin.
Informed sources reveal that at
least one more associated federal
complaint will be filed soon, along
with other various filings that will
pull together serious allegations of
ethics related public corruption
from every corner of New York State. Stay tuned to this story:
Tammany Hall II – this is history,
albeit ugly, in the making…
And we’ll be
posting the One and one-half Billion
dollar Patentgate lawsuit soon!
Excellent
news! Let the lawsuits fly in!
Overhere, in the Netherlands, I am
still working on a amended ethics
grievance -- against Melvyn Weiss
and associates at Milberg Weiss --
which will reveal, in most obvious
terms, that the Disciplinary
Committee whitewashed the ethics
grievance against Mel Weiss. My case
is not a billion dollar issue,
though I will hold the Disciplinary
Committee responsible for their
severe negligence [tort] in my case.
Secondly: I have a surprise due for
judge Greenaway in the Genta
litigation:-)) Stay tuned!
I was
present for part of the Anderson v.
State matter, then it was annouced
that Mr. S. Lamont/Iviewit had just
filed this case - WOW! Even the
Judge took note! From what I could
see there were some other folks that
additionally wanted to join in. Good
Luck it looks to be interesting.
Here is
hoping NYC gives a big push to cases
filed in areas outside of it! It
should be more impactful if federal
court sees cases filed against OCA
AGENCIES ALL OVER THE STATE! Good
luck to all of what is going on in
NYC!
just take a
look at the list of employees over
thier. Just look at
at the racial diversity of Manhattan
and then look at how few minoritys
that work thier.
Look at how they hire people not by
qualifications by who they know to
get in.
IF any private company had such a
small percentage of minoritys they
probably would be sued and forced to
become equal opertunity employers.
That's the
way the big law firms especially the
"white Shoe" ones get to control the
system and get away with all their
criminal doings - they don't want
any n*****s in the wood pile!
I've seen
the website on "Iviewit" the ones
that filed this federal suit, man
it's wild! There are pictures of
this guy Bernstein's car that the
lawyers/thugs blew-up! This is
serious dude!
Lord only
knows what else these creeps got
away with... people were too afraid
to go against these monsters and
bullies, therefore, never reporting
it..or reported it and it was swept
under the rug.
Can't wait
to see the complaint against the
woman that was sexually abused by
her attorney Allen H. Isaac and how
they are protecting him..He should
be behind bars and disbarred..but
yet he continues to practice law..go
figure..he's got the DDC in his
pocket also...I hope she exposes
their corruption in her lawsuit, so
that all could see how the DDC even
protects sexual predators.
While
surfing I came across this blog
which is very good. It is even more
important because approximately 6
years ago I filed several complaints
against attorneys in the 1st Dept.
that just died. I kept calling
speaking with various people
including Mr. Thomas Cahill and all
I was told was to resend the
complaints because they could not
find them, they had been lost. After
the 5th time I gave up! Reading all
this I now have a pretty good handle
on what happened.
OCA cannot
get away with anything more.
Shortly, some DISCOVERY will be
expressed, exposed and
manifested...much to the stupidity
and arrogance of their legal dept
and ATTY JOHN J. SULLIVAN, ESQ. What
is included in this document is
going to be A ball buster and shock
for these losers! OCA never knew
what went on upstate for years! The
type of people, the events and
finally the judicial actions taken
without any knowledge of all of this
( only an attempt by NYC employees
and judiciary to protect the
ethnicity and political status of
these hacks), will be a JOY to
present! MARK YOUR CALENDAR FOR jan
2, 2008!
Federal Judge Scheindlin
Asserts Ethics Scandal Cases Related
YONKERS, NY -- On Thursday, January
10, 2008, U.S. Federal District
Court Judge Shira A. Scheindlin
directed that the $1.5 Billion
Iviewit “patentgate” case (
Download
iviewit_patentgat_complaint_case.pdf
), filed in the U.S. District Court
for the Southern District of New
York on December 12, 2007, be
assigned to her court.
Patent Attorney Ray Joao, a Yonkers
resident, is one among other
defendants alleged to have stolen
inventions from
Iviewit and calling those
inventions their own.
Judge
Scheindlin accepted the Iviewit
lawsuit, Bernstein v. Appellate
Division First Department
Departmental Disciplinary Committee,
as related to the pending
New York attorney ethics
scandal case, Anderson v. The State
of New York.
Allegations of covering-up and
whitewashing complaints against
favored attorneys find both cases
seeking the appointment of a federal
monitor to take over New York’s
statewide attorney ethics
committees. A third lawsuit, filed
December 28, 2007, is currently
under review by Judge Scheindlin to
be designated as an associated case
in the state ethics scandal, Tammany
Hall II.
Federal Magistrate Judge Douglas F.
Eaton has also been assigned to both
the Anderson and Iviewit matters.
In another order, signed January 9,
2008, Judge Scheindlin directed U.S.
Marshals to serve the Iviewit
lawsuit on the listed defendants.
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/2176356/25107578
Petition to Feinstein to submit
legislation to suspend patent pending applications of Iviewit for an indefinite
period while investigations are ongoing.
Article relating to uncovering
of corruption with the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First
Department - Departmental Disciplinary Committee, Chief Counsel, Thomas J.
Cahill. Cahill who aided and abetted by blocking three Iviewit complaints against Proskauer
partners, Kenneth Rubenstein (MPEGLA LLC Counsel), Steven C. Krane (former New
York State Bar Association) & Raymond Joao, from investigation. Then
he got caught in
conflicts and violation of public offices that led to a Supreme Court of New
York Court Order for
immediate investigation of the three Proskauer partners and a Special Inquiry
investigation of Cahill.
The
Office of Professional Representatives Before the European Patent Office,
who regulates attorney conduct, sends documents to Iviewit found in the EPO
files while investigating the Iviewit matters, clearly distinguishing them as
fraudulent in comparison to the documents filed by Iviewit counsel, Martyn
Molyneaux. Missing exhibits and altered document text in EPO files.
Chart showing how complaints have
been blocked using violations of public offices, the hierarchy of conflicts and
who and how they relate. Those highlighted in
green
are not yet found denying due process and
procedure
Article relating to uncovering
of corruption with the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First
Department - Departmental Disciplinary Committee, Chief Counsel, Thomas J.
Cahill. Cahill blocked three Iviewit complaints against Proskauer
partners, Kenneth Rubenstein (MPEGLA LLC Counsel), Steven C. Krane (former New
York State Bar Association) & Raymond Joao, from investigation and got caught in
conflicts and violation of public offices. That led to a court order for
investigation of the three Proskauer partners and a Special Inquiry
Investigation of Cahill.
Nita Lowey, sends Lamont
shareholder complaint to Dingell, as the Commerce Department is centrally
involved in the matters and the matters have importance to survival of free
commerce in America. Dingell has his counsel review and himself and moves
the matters to the Judiciary Committee for investigation.
2003 09 26 - Iviewit letter to The
Florida Bar, that civil case was over which is why the failed to
investigate originally, although Florida Bar rules prohibit
delaying investigation into bar complaints because of civil
cases.
Filing with the United States Patent &
Trademark Office claiming that per the direction of Harry I.
Moatz, Director of the Office of Enrollment & Discipline,
Iviewit & Crossbow Ventures were seeking the Commissioner of
Patents to suspend the Iviewit patents based on evidence of
Fraud on the United States Patent & Trademark Office by Iviewit
former Intellectual Property attorneys, Kenneth Rubenstein,
Proskauer Rose LLP, Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolf & Schlissel,
Raymond Anthony Joao, Foley & Lardner, William J. Dick, Douglas
Boehm, Steven Becker, Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman, Thomas
Coester, Norman Zafman, Farzahd Ahmini, Christopher & Weisberg
PA, Krishna Narine, Andrew Barroway, Schiffrin & Barroway and
others. This led to the Commissioner of Patents suspending
certain of the Iviewit patent applications into an infinite
black hole. The form also included inventor change forms which
have gone wholly unresolved while patents are in black hole at
the United States Patent & Trademark Office.'
2004 07 15 - American Internation Group
"AIG" Directors and Officers policy internal affairs letter
regarding fraud on AIG committed by Proskauer Rose.
PART III - MEET THE CONSPIRATORS ATTEMPTING TO
STEAL THE HOLY GRAIL INVENTIONS OR THE INVENTIONS THAT WERE A GIFT FROM G0D TO
HELP YOUR CHILDREN
Christopher Clarke Wheeler, Esq.
Meet Christopher Clarke Wheeler, the Proskauer
Rose attorney the inventors and Simon Bernstein first trusted with their
inventions, the first lawyer on the scene. Wheeler was introduced to
Iviewit by Simon Bernstein's neighbor in Florida, Eliot Bernstein's personal
accountant at the time for other business activity, Gerald R. Lewin, also first
on the scene. Lewin is the guy wholly responsible for assembling the team
of crooks, as the first zoom technology was brought to him and he promised to
get us a good attorney. When he introduced us to Wheeler, he vouched for
him, he was his 20 year friend, along with Albert Gortz, Esq. of Proskauer.
What they failed to notify the Bernstein's about was that Lewin, knew at the
time that Wheeler had been involved in attempting to steal patents and
tradesecrets from a one Monte Friedkin with guys yet to be introduced to the
Bernstein's, later the Iviewit shareholders, Mssrs: Brian Utley and William J.
Dick, Esq of Foley and Lardner. At the time it was unknown to all but
Lewin and the scam was on. In the end, if the story holds true as to how
the patents were stolen, how the government was stolen...these two will be the
clowns most responsible for things like dead kids in Iraq, read on...
EXTRA! EXTRA! READ ALL ABOUT IT ~ PROSKAUER ROSE
ATTORNEY CHRISTOPHER CLARKE WHEELER, ESQ. CONVICTED FOR A FELONY DUI W/ INJURY CHARGE. THE BEGINNING OF MANY CHARGES HE MAY BE FACING!!!
The link below provides the Del Ray Beach Florida
Police Report. Wheeler's wife sells him down the river, screaming he
should not have been driving WASTED, Wheezler's wife further disses him to PD
stating he left the guy injured in the car, to wasted to even care. Wins
funniest police report ever, unless you were the poor guy in the other car
injured. You wonder how he kept his partnership at Proskauer, oops, they
only hire criminals and thugs, dirty lawyers. Proskauer is such a shitty
firm they are oft referred to as a Brown Shoe New York law firm.
Wheezler is the original violator of his legal
oaths to Iviewit, he should stand up well in court one day, that is if he is not
toooooo wasted to stand, he certainly will stand well in hell soon.
Click the picture or smack the Wheezler
for his DUI arrest report, it is a hoot.
Organization crime chart showing the various
connections between the key conspirators. One man was left out at the time
the charts where done, Michael Grebe of Foley and Lardner who elevates the
charts to the highest level, you will learn more about him below.
Did the Founding Fathers, the guys drafting the
Constitution envision a time where the largest companies, perhaps even states,
the federal government and foreign nations would try an rip-off inventors and
not pay their rightful royalties to them? Could they have imaging to
perpetrate the crime their would be a siege on the government, on the Commerce
Department by those entrusted with protecting the inventor? A siege all
the way to the top of the Executive, Judicial and Legislative branches, read
on...
Did the Founders see that in giving the Inventor
monopoly powers that these same forces that would try to steal inventions would
also attempt to murder the inventor? See car bombing above.
Did the Founders know that these same forces
would at times try to rip apart and destroy the Inventor using unfair trade
practices to wipe them out of business, bundling and tying the inventions and
blocking the ma and pa inventor from market to prey upon their inventions
without remuneration.
Here we go, all the way to Congress,
to test our new Congress and to see if the Administration of Corruption has
ceased to be or just changed face with the Democrats regaining some
semblance of power back. Oh but wait, it appears that
Congress is like an unstable molecule, with one murder or death, deciding
votes could come from Darth Cheney. Will they kill a congressman to
shift the balance of power? Shits crazy, getting crazier, so watch out
what you eat Congressman. Desperate men will do desperate things to
hide from their crimes, ask any Nazi.
Remember as Iviewit goes to this new
Democratic Congress it is Iviewit's contention that the corruption is not
party specific. That the criminals are neither loyal to Democrats nor
Republicans but instead to spoiled rotten click clubs like Skull & Bones,
Council on Foreign Relations, Bohemian and other ubber right wing fanatical
groups with agenda's inapposite Democracy, positioning on both sides of
political tickets, a member of the click assured a win either way, their cult
agenda overriding their oath to the People.
If that fails, it appears that election fraud is becoming the next easiest
ticket into politics and where that fails fire the prosecutors.
Did the Founders foresee a situation whereby the
forces they instituted to protect the Inventor would be usurped by the very
legal system of protection instituted to protect the inventor? An
infiltration of the three branches of the government, a treasonous attempt to
steal Democracy for self interests at the highest levels, so as to perverse the
entire system to usurp the gatekeepers of Democracy with members of secret cults
with agenda's against the People?
Why you ask would anyone attempt such heinous
crimes against the People? Trillion dollar technologies from Iviewit as
one example but if you
remember, the guys who started first stealing Iviewit technology, had a past in
patent theft, perhaps Iviewit was the biggest they had come across. Yet
knowing it was organized leaves
one to wonder how deep they had already infiltrated the patent office, how many
thefts were in process before Iviewit and Monte Friedkin, how many other inventors had they ripped
off, how many others had they attempted to murder, how many may they have
already murdered? Is MPEGLA LLC a criminal organization designed to gain
disclosure of inventions under attorney client privilege and then kill inventors
or drive them out of market, tying and bundling their inventions to their
controlled standards and patent pools, stealing at will with no fear of
prosecution, so brazen as to propose
HR 1908 a broad daylight attempt to rob
the patent office and the patent holders by changing the fundamental laws of the
system by the very people that are supposed to protect the People, at the
highest level. Hang the dirty attorneys who even put pen to this
Treasonous act. Had they already infiltrated
positions within the USPTO, was this a mechanism for organized crime syndicate to steal
the greatest jewels in America from unsuspecting inventors and fund their
criminal organizations.
Another link that may raise your other brow in
tying Iviewit to the overthrow of the government, is
the fact that Judge Jorge Labarga who turned the election debacle in Florida to
the Florida Supreme Court v. demanding a recount was soon thereafter the Judge
who took over the Proskauer Rose lawsuit against Iviewit for a supposed billing
dispute. Turned out to be an attempt to rid the illegally set up
corporations by Proskauer, after Arthur Andersen started snooping around, by
suing these companies to create a large debt, while having their former
management plants like Utley file an involuntary bankruptcy against them, so as
they would have claims to the stolen Intellectual Property within them.
The Iviewit shareholders and management had no idea that the companies were any
legal actions, as the company was being represented by counsel Proskauer
retained to perfect the scam. Bait and Switch, Shell Game, Flim Flam and
every dirty trick in the book that a lawyer could execute. Iviewit was
tipped off to the actions by a tipster from AOLTW who was doing due diligence
when happening upon these legal actions no one had disclosed in the Wachovia
Private Placement Proskauer had disseminated to them and was distributing to
other unsuspecting investors, including the SBA.
Complaint against Wheeler at the Florida Bar is
found to be handled by Matthew Triggs, a Proskauer partner who is found to be
violating his position as an officer of the Florida Supreme Court - The Florida
Bar. Triggs is precluded from representing any party without waiver from
the Board, conceals his conflict, and fires off a seething attack, in violation
of public office against inventor Bernstein.
MPEGLA PATENT EVALUATOR -
KENNETH RUBENSTEIN OF PROSKAUER ROSE ORDERED FOR INVESTIGATION BY THE SUPREME
COURT OF NEW YORK - UNANIMOUS ORDER BY 5 JUSTICES OF THE FIRST DEPARTMENT FOR
CONFLICT AND APPEARANCE OF IMPROPRIETY
(Click on the picture to
see the Supreme Court of New York First Department
Orders for investigation of Rubenstein and others
for conflicts of interest, violations of public
offices and the appearance of impropriety)
WHO IS THE
MPEG LA ATTORNEY AND SOLE
PATENT EVALUATOR FOR THE MPEG PATENT POOL???
AND
A PROSKAUER
ROSE LLP ATTORNEY, IN THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
DIVISION OF PROSKAUER FORMED IMMEDIATELY AFTER LEARNING OF THE IVIEWIT
INVENTIONS?
AND
FORMER IVIEWIT PATENT COUNSEL?
AND
A FORMER IVIEWIT BOARD MEMBER?
AND
AN IVIEWIT SHAREHOLDER?
AND
WHAT DO ALL THESE HAVE IN COMMON?
MEET
KENNETH RUBENSTEIN, ESQ. OF PROSKAUER ROSE LLP
The following taped message centers on the fact that
Rubenstein was busted lying under deposition, when further evidence
proving he was involved with Iviewit are delivered from Christopher Wheeler
to Iviewit counsel Steve Selz, proving Rubenstein lied under deposition
After production at the Labarga Circus Court and
after their depositions where they ran and did everything not to have to finish,
since so much perjury was already done, Proskauer drops off documents that completely
contradict their own stories, our attorney cannot believe it and calls them the
"holy grail" documents. Little did we know that Labarga was dirty and
would deny due process to deny the evidence from being submitted at trial, by throwing the
case and preventing a trial
in the most illegal way he could. Labarga suppresses the evidence showing these guys
were involved in lying about crimes against the United States in his court and
under deposition. Must have cost a bundle to buy out of this mess.
Proskauer now controls and inures revenue from
the MPEGLA LLC patent pools through their hire of Rubenstein who created and
controlled them as lead counsel and after 200 years as a real estate law firm,
suddenly became a leading intellectual property firm, specializing in the exact
markets Iviewit's technologies applied too. The pools would have been
rendered obsolete had Iviewit not licensed them to the pools and partnered
instead with others.
Rubenstein is responsible for the illegal tying
and bundling of the Iviewit technologies with his pool license, using this
scheme to lift the inventions while blocking Iviewit from market through
anticompetitive racketeering practices, in violation of virtually all antitrust
laws.
One may ask how a law firm can inure benefits
learned from client disclosures despite the massive and obvious conflict of
interest. Yes that is a question. A question that leaves one asking
how in the name of law and justice can a patent attorney put client patents in
their own names and inure benefits and the law looks the other way, as if the
criminals were above the law or have criminal friends in high places...
How have these legal giants been able to avoid
prosecution you ask? The answer, the greatest infiltration of public
offices in the history of the US. Knowing that to be tried and convicted
would lead to immediate loss of all their worldly possessions and lengthy,
lengthy federal sentences for their crimes committed against the United States
and its citizens.
COVER-UPS AND DERAILED INVESTIGATIONS
ALREADY EXPOSED
1. Conflicts confirmed in the Florida Supreme
Court - The Florida Bar, against acting officers and then covered up. The
cover up through brut force denial of due process by failing to formally docket
and dispose of cases against those found violating public office, inapposite the
Constitution of Florida and the United States regarding complaints against
public officials.
Matthew Triggs of Proskauer Rose LLP, represented
his Proskauer partner, Christopher Clarke Wheeler, while in a blackout period
precluding his representation of any party due to his Supreme Court of Florida -
The Florida Bar office position he held. Conflicts against Triggs were
confirmed by TFB and when formal complaints were filed for Triggs, TFB refused
to docket them and instead of having Triggs put up his own defense, TFB
attempted to exculpate him from prosecution by having Cheif Counsel of TFB, John
Anthony Boggs, state that based on law (used proposed law he had just drafted
claiming it was law) Triggs could have, should have asked the Board to allow his
representation and they would have, maybe, allowed his representation. It
was a little more complicated as Triggs was also representing Proskauer in their
phony law suit against Iviewit fraudulent company's they set up, again the
conflicts were prohibitive for using his Supreme Court Florida public offices to
represent a claim against Proskauer by Iviewit, while representing Proskauer in
the billing case. A total of approximately 13 conflicts and violations of
public were cited.
The Supreme Court of Florida - The Florida Bar,
refusal to docket the Triggs complaint and the complaints against other officers
including Kelly Overstreet Johnson, President, was petitioned to The Florida
Supreme Court, which of course is inherently conflicted in reviewing and or
handling complaints against TFB Officers as it would affect the Florida Supreme
Court D&O policy, so it is like complaining to the Chief of Police about the
Chief of Police and asking him to be fair in imprisoning himself, oh yeah, that
story actually comes later. Thus, the bar association of Florida is a
complete joke of corruption, no complaints survive the assault, conflicts run
rampant, Justices obfuscate justice in favor of favoritism and well it should
just be turned into a drinking establishment for corrupt lawyers.
The refusal of the Florida Supreme Court to hear
the cases against their brethren at TFB, inapposite of law and due process led
to filing a Writ of Certiorari in the United States Supreme Court.
2. The conflicts and violation of public offices
by Proskauer then continues undisclosed and again are discovered in the New York
Supreme Courts whereby complaints against Proskauer's New York partners were
handled inapposite of the New York Constitution and the United States
Constitution in regard to filing complaints against public officers.
Again, senior members of the disciplinary are found violating their public
office, this time, former New York State Bar Association President, Steven C.
Krane. Krane, also in a blackout period from his NYSBA office and also a
senior disciplinary figure with roles at the Supreme Court of New York Appellate
Division: First Department - Departmental Disciplinary Committee, handles
complaints filed at the First Department by representing his Proskauer partner
Rubenstein, of course failing to disclose or seek approval for his conflicts.
Krane, when caught in the act, attempts a suicide letter, whereby he claims he
is not conflicted and has no role in the First Department and that former CEO
Lamont and inventor Bernstein were to stupid to know the difference between the
NYSBA and First Department. Thomas Cahill, Chief Counsel of the
First Department DDC, confirmed that Krane had no roles at the First Department,
despite what his biography at the Proskauer Rose site said and other information
pointing to Krane as a leading figure in the First Department DDC.
That went far until upon contacting the Clerk of the First Department, Catherine
O'Hagan Wolfe to elevate the complaint against both Rubenstein and Krane now,
Wolfe revealed that Cahill and Krane certainly must have been on triple crack
when they stated Krane had no role with the DDC, as she was to attend a DDC with
both of them in the evening and that she sat on several boards with both of
them, making it impossible for them to claim such. Wolfe then directed
Lamont and Bernstein to file a Petition with the First Department stating that
Krane and Cahill were BIG FAT LIARS, or words to that effect, and to say she
said so. Krane already signing his suicide note claiming he had no roles,
well the life blood has been seeping out of his big fat lying, unethical and
wholly disgusting body since. Busted in Gotham.
So the Petition is drafted showing Cahill and
Krane are BIG FAT LIARS and are conflicted and have violated their public
offices. Ok, Cahill's complaint gets turned over to Martin Gold for a
Special Inquiry, which has been ongoing ever since with no word to Iviewit of
the outcome of that matter. Next, five Justices of the Supreme Court of
New York Appellate Division: First Department conferred and unanimously ruled,
after due deliberation, to have Steven C. Krane, Kenneth Rubenstein and Raymond
Joao for immediate INVESTIGATION.
Golly Gee Batman, how did they weasel out of that
one?
Well Robin, it turns out the investigating
department was also fraught with corruption, conflicts and further violations of
public offices.
Holy Cow Batman, has all of Gotham's justice
corrupted? Commissioner Gordon?
Worse yet Robin, it may elevate up to the Federal
level, all the way to the, well you know, the Decider and his buddy Al at the
Justice Department. It's ok though Robin, Batman is here.
Are you corrupt Batman? Da Da Da Da Da Da
Da Daaa Batman, stay tuned for our next episode whereby corrupt officials put
forth no defense in response to the court ordered investigation, as the
investigators write defenses for them instead of investigating them. In
our next episode Batman faces off with Chief Judge Ma Barker aka Judith Kaye
(could have been stand-in for Wicked Witch in OZ),
her Proskauer husband Stephen Rakowe Kaye and her former whipping boy clerk
stool, Proskauer partner Steven C. Krane. Will Batman survive or die, will
Robin split to Cleveland and will Gotham be left with Joker's running, or should
we say ruining Gotham, stay tuned for our next action packed episode or you'll
never know if Gotham goes to hell.
The orders for investigation at the New York
Supreme Court Appellate Division: Second Department where derailed and dismissed
upon review, whereby the Second Department claimed they were under no obligation
to follow the First Department court order for investigation. Lifting the
skirt of the Second Department Chief Counsel and lead non-investigator, Dianna
Maxfield Kearse, revealed more spoiled rotten apples in the big apple.
Kearse after making her determination, admitted conflict with Steven C. Krane
that imparted more than just the appearance of impropriety it was wholly
indecent. In fact, upon receiving a complaint against her from Iviewit,
she refused to formally docket and procedurally handle her complaint. This
elevated to Lawrence DiGiovanna, Chairman of the Second Department DDC, who
claimed he was ok with her conflict and did not feel the complaint should be
docketed and disposed according to due process and procedure. A complaint
was filed against DiGiovanna and again, Kearse, acting still in conflict,
refused to formally docket the complaint, again denying due process and
procedure per their own laws.
It was upon taking the complaints to the next
level, the Clerk of the Second Department, James Pelzer, on behalf of Chief
Justice, A. Gail Prudenti, when it was learned that Judith Kaye, Chief Judge of
the whole of the New York Court System and big part of the disciplinary
committees in New York was married to, you got it, a Proskauer partner.
Not just any Proskauer partner but a partner who had been practicing for many
years in like dispute resolution, who was suddenly made a partner in the newly
formed Intellectual Property department, formed immediately after taking
disclosures on the Iviewit inventions and funded by them ever since. Krane
also made the Intellectual Property department, you know, an ethics guy with no
ethics, the biggest piece of shit in New York. In fact, that whole
department spearheaded by Rubenstein is criminally insane now
3. We can top the state corruption in the Supreme Court with the
United State Supreme Court
COURT
CASE #05-6611 action or
shall we say inaction. In taking the Florida Supreme Court denial to hear
the matters of public officers caught violating public offices of the Florida
Supreme Court, whereby other officers of the Florida Supreme Court used proposed
legislation to attempt to exculpate those found violating their offices after
confirming violations. Further, other officers of that Court then refused
to docket complaints against those found violating their offices. With all
that known it recently 2007 was learned that the Solicitor General of Florida at
the time, a one Christopher Kise, now a Florida Partner of Foley and Lardner
with a special post created for him by Governor Charlie Crist in the Governor's
offices, may have been the ace in the hole or the rat in the Court that blocked
Iviewit, again top down.
With no chance of Justice in Florida, one may ask
how Iviewit fared at the Supreme's well they just gave a one line denial to hear
the case, leaving Iviewit with no way to file complaints against Florida Supreme
Court officers caught violating their public offices, reminiscent of Russia of
yesteryear. No victory for either side in the Florida court or the
Supreme's but a complete denial of due process and procedure, a stonewalling of
justice by Justices. Perhaps again why Sandra Day and others are getting
death threats if they rule on cases or just getting the hell out of the Justice
of Corruption claiming we are in the throes of a dictatorship.
Again, no victory for either in Court but the
denial of due process and procedure is an effective way to preclude the
shareholders and inventors from filing complaints against corrupt public
officials and blowing the lid right there and then. The refusal to docket
and dispose of complaints against public officers is diametrically opposed to
the intent of the Florida Constitution and the United States Constitution by
those who are supposed to be upholding it.
The whole case is soon to be appealed when fair and impartial due
process again returns to the Courts and with new evidence the case will have
more fodder discovered after filing the original.
4. Boca Raton PD. This investigation or
shall we say, this investigation should be about how not investigate while
telling everyone you are. Boca Police Department begins investigations and
then loses them. They state the SEC is co-investigating the claims and the
SEC denies such. They begin an internal affairs review which lingers on.
Yes, this document is over a thousand pages, chalk
full of evidence and witness against Foley and Lardner partner Dick Dick.
Even after the Virginia Bar learns that the USPTO and the USPTO-OED are starting
investigation based on the intellectual property sheet Dick Dick provided to the
Virginia Bar in his defense because it contains factually incorrect owners,
assignees, etc. the Virginia Bar refused to investigate. Can you imagine,
the Federal Patent Bar is investigating based on the docket submitted to the
Virginia Bar by Dick, and they refuse to investigate or even wait for the
determination of the Federal Patent Bar.
Once caught and trying to cover up, Joao's law
firms fax machine and Utley's assistant, are changed to try and match the
current date. Instead both fax machines are set to March 19, one fax
machine is set to the year 1900 and the other to 2020! THIS ACTUALLY IS ON FILE WITH THE UNITED
STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
STEPHEN KRANE - FORMER
PRESIDENT OF THE NEW YORK BAR
AND YOU GUESSED IT
PROSKAUER ROSE INTELLECTUAL
PROPERTY PARTNER.
ORDERED FOR INVESTIGATION BY THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK - 5 JUSTICES FIRST
DEPARTMENT
(Click on the picture to
see the most influential member of the New York
Disciplinary and former President of the New York
State Bar, ordered for investigation by the very
department he has public office with for conflicts
of interest and the appearance of impropriety)
So Steven C. Krane, Porksauers finest porker,
traif, yudenrat to the core if you can cut through the fat. Krane is a disgrace to
everything ethical since Socrates first penned it. So Krane, while an
officer of the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division: First Department
Departmental Disciplinary Committee handles his Proskauer Partner Rubenstein's
complaint and fails to disclose his position. Further, as former President
of the NYSBA Krane was precluded for handling any disciplinary matters during a
blackout period following his position. Further, upon a formal complaint
against Krane, First Dept DDC, Chief Counsel Thomas Cahill tells Iviewit
contrary to Krane's own Proskauer Bio and other damning evidence that Krane is
not involved at the First Dept DDC. Krane writes his suicide note claiming
he has no roles, when upon moving the complaint to the next highest level for
investigation, Clerk of the First Department, Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe busts both
of them by stating they are liars, as she has a First Department DDC committee
meeting that night with both of them attending in official capacity both know of
the others roles. Wolfe directs
Iviewit to file a Petition with the Justices of the First Department citing the
conflicts and evidence and the Justices, after due deliberation, unanimously
vote to move the complaints and begin an immediate investigation of Krane,
Rubenstein and Joao. Cahill gets sent to a Special Inquiry by Martin Gold,
who appears to have fell off the planet after receiving the job.
Ok, so how does the slimy grotesque beast of
Satan's ethics department wiggle that large ass out of this one. Well, the
answer is obvious, to have more friends in conflict assigned to investigate him
at the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division: Second Department -
Departmental Disciplinary Committee (I hate writing these names as much as you
hate reading them). The Chief Counsel, Dianna Maxwell Kearse, after
admitting that she failed to do any investigation what so ever as ordered by the
five Justices then admits when asked that she has a bit of conflict with Steven
Krane. The rest of the chain of command at the Second Department aided and
abetted the denial of the court ordered investigation, many in further conflict.
It was here that it was learned that Chief Judge of the New York Courts, Judge
Judith Kaye was married to Proskauer partner and Krane was her former clerk.
No wonder the investigation was derailed, whereby the accused never put forward
a defense for themselves, no witnesses were contacted and no evidence tested.
Iviewit went and complained to federal investigators who were supposed to be
investigating all this amongst the hundreds of other crimes committed in
connection with Iviewit until recently when the FBI appears to have lost the
case files and the investigator was claimed to have retired with the missing
files.
Sandra Day O'Connor, nominated by
Ronald Reagan as the first woman supreme court
justice, declared: "We must be ever-vigilant against
those who would strong-arm the judiciary."
She pointed to autocracies in the developing world
and former Communist countries as lessons on where
interference with the judiciary might lead. "It
takes a lot of degeneration before a country falls
into dictatorship, but we should avoid these ends by
avoiding these beginnings."
Morning Edition,
March 10, 2006 · Newly retired Supreme Court Justice
Sandra Day O'Connor took on conservative Republican critics
of the courts in a speech Thursday. She told an audience at
Georgetown University that Republican proposals, and their
sometimes uncivil tone, pose a danger to the independence of
the judiciary, and the freedoms of all Americans.
Former
Top Judge Says US Risks Edging Near to Dictatorship ·
Sandra Day O'Connor warns of rightwing attacks
· Lawyers 'must speak up' to protect judiciary
Published on Monday, March 13, 2006 by the
Guardian /
UK
by Julian Borger
Sandra Day O'Connor, a
Republican-appointed judge who retired last month after 24 years on the
supreme court, has said the US is in danger of edging towards dictatorship
if the party's rightwingers continue to attack the judiciary.
In a strongly worded speech
at Georgetown University, reported by National Public Radio and the Chicago
Daily Law Bulletin, Ms O'Connor took aim at Republican leaders whose
repeated denunciations of the courts for alleged liberal bias could, she
said, be contributing to a climate of violence against judges.
Ms O'Connor, nominated by
Ronald Reagan as the first woman supreme court justice, declared: "We must
be ever-vigilant against those who would strong-arm the judiciary."
She pointed to autocracies
in the developing world and former Communist countries as lessons on where
interference with the judiciary might lead. "It takes a lot of degeneration
before a country falls into dictatorship, but we should avoid these ends by
avoiding these beginnings."
In her address to an
audience of corporate lawyers on Thursday, Ms O'Connor singled out a warning
to the judiciary issued last year by Tom DeLay, the former Republican leader
in the House of Representatives, over a court ruling in a controversial
"right to die" case.
After the decision last
March that ordered a brain-dead woman in Florida, Terri Schiavo, removed
from life support, Mr DeLay said: "The time will come for the men
responsible for this to answer for their behaviour."
Mr DeLay later called for
the impeachment of judges involved in the Schiavo case, and called for more
scrutiny of "an arrogant, out-of-control, unaccountable judiciary that
thumbed their nose at Congress and the president".
Such threats, Ms O'Connor
said, "pose a direct threat to our constitutional freedom", and she told the
lawyers in her audience: "I want you to tune your ears to these attacks ...
You have an obligation to speak up.
"Statutes and constitutions
do not protect judicial independence - people do," the retired supreme court
justice said.
She noted death threats
against judges were on the rise and added that the situation was not helped
by a senior senator's suggestion that there might be a connection between
the violence against judges and the decisions they make.
The senator she was
referring to was John Cornyn, a Bush loyalist from Texas, who made his
remarks last April, soon after a judge was shot dead in an Atlanta courtroom
and the family of a federal judge was murdered in Illinois.
Senator Cornyn said: "I
don't know if there is a cause and effect connection, but we have seen some
recent episodes of courthouse violence in this country ... And I wonder
whether there may be some connection between the perception in some
quarters, on some occasions, where judges are making political decisions yet
are unaccountable to the public, that it builds up and builds up to the
point where some people engage in violence."
Although appointed by a
Republican, Ms O'Connor voted with the supreme court's liberals on some
divisive issues, including abortion, making her a frequent target for
criticism from the right. After announcing that she intended to retire last
year at the age of 75, she was replaced in February this year by Samuel
Alito, who is generally regarded as being more consistently conservative.
In her speech, Ms O'Connor
said that if the courts did not occasionally make politicians mad they would
not be doing their jobs, and their effectiveness "is premised on the notion
that we won't be subject to retaliation for our judicial acts".
MEET MICHAEL GREBE
(aka Grubby or Goebbels)
The Man (who hides behind the scenes) Who
Ruined America
FORMER CEO FOLEY AND
LARDNER, CURRENTLY AT THE BRADLEY FOUNDATION (FAR FAR RIGHT WING NUTCASES) AND
FORMER REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE (RNC - THE ONES WHO SET UP A BACKCHANNEL TO
THE WHITEHOUSE WHERE MANY EMAILS ARE MISSING THAT CONGRESS WANTS AND THE RNC HAS
REFUSED).
It appears that Porksour's partner in this crime,
Foley and Lardner, was controlled at time of invention theft by none other than
Michael Grebe, aka Goebbels, another who will be accorded a place in history as
a
loser (like his idol Hitler, makes you wonder why anyone idolizes a loser) who helped ruin America,
through corruption under the disguise of law and order. Mike was
Chief Counsel of the
Republican National Committee (RNC), oh yeah, they are the
guys who just got a subpoena from the Judiciary Committee of the United States
Congress for missing emails in relation to the Alberto
Gonzales mess of firings, leading to another chip at the corruptions at the top
of our wholly corrupted government, stave a few brave people trying to save our
country from the abomination we have become. Mike also funds author's of books
like,
The Bell Curve, that
claims that blacks are mentally inferior to whites through hisBradley
Foundation (for all those
who really want to learn about the Cancer that plagues America
TRY THIS LINK or visit the end of
this page, where all Mike's contributions and those he failed to report
are listed in full with his friends in blood red. Mike also heavily funds
American Enterprise Institute ) Grebe
is working to a
New World Order, where everyone is a slave to him and his NeoCon Whitebread freakballs who seem more like Hitler Youth on
steroids; other Bradley grantees include the Education Foundation; the Hoover
Institute on War, Revolution, and Peace; and the Ronald Reagan Presidential
Foundation. There are the major conservative publications, such as The Public
Interest, The National Interest, and The American Spectator. And there are
organizations set up to play specific roles in promoting the right-wing agenda,
such as the Institute for Justice, a public interest law firm that promotes
privatization and deregulation, and the National Center for Neighborhood
Enterprise, a vehicle for building support for privatization in low-income
communities. Perhaps it is he who engineered how to flood New Orleans, then how to avoid a response,
then how to let blacks die in the attic and now how to buy up their land.
I mean they are mentally inferior according to his study he paid a Harvard
whitey to write for a 250,000 grant. This guy photo ops himself at black
catholic schools to promote his school voucher plan, which is a plan to get the
"inferior blacks" out of schools and back to slavery. I mean
do
the research on this guy and you find that although he belongs to think tanks
and Neocon groups that are all named flowery things and misnomers for what they
truly are, each of these
organizations he belongs to is right wing gone mad. My technologies not
only provided the funding for this shit but the impetus to executed the whole
New World Order agenda and these were gifts from G0d to help your children and
they converted them in sin for sin. I feel personally responsible for much
of the atrocities going on as it was my stuff that pushed the brewing
generational assault by two different groups, The Federalist and the Skull &
Boneheads.
Anyhooy, how does this play into Iviewit and our condemnation of Foley? Well imagine
if you have on one side Proskauer with strong democratic positioning, working
with Foley who controls the RNC through Grebe, one of the most powerful and
influential Republicans, and you decide to find a candidate that can fill the
suit of a Republican and at the same time partner up with you in crime, all you
need to do is add a bit of election fraud to insure you get your boys in.
Grebe backed Bush II., like he has backed several Republicans (Reagan & Bush I) and in those
presidencies we also went to war with oil nations, had Iran Contra, The Gulf War and all this
other Nazi like shit America has
been led into as an aggressor nation, look deep at this man for he ruined America
almost single handedly. This is a behind the scenes man in the corruption
of government, law and everything those things stand for, a man who has found a
way to rob the patent office through corrupt lawyers. Grebe cares not for either political party, he
infiltrated the Republican Party and has henceforth ruined it, it is time
Republican's realize they have been overtaken by Nazi like freaks like Grebe and
get honor back to the Grand Ole Party. All Grebe cares about is his
Federalist Agenda and he is the key to Federalism/Nazism in America and abroad,
he is a behind the scenes Commander, a Vietnam Vet gone mad, who hates America
and the freedoms afforded to the people as it does not fit his New World Order
plan where you are his slave. Mike is probably the guy who has been
rewriting the Constitution to take your personal freedoms in things like the
Patriot Act, a man who believes in Gitmoschwitz and human torture and all those
good things America is now disgraced in. Mike hides behind the scenes
because he is a coward. Mike's former law firm, Foley and Lardner, is
involved in robbing the Patent Office and robbing their clients, I would be very
careful of giving any inventions to their firm of total losers.
Another caution, the New World Order begins with
an enhanced World War III, a catalyst event bigger than 9/11 that puts America
into real war with real large scale enemies, all good for the illegal war
profiteering, thinning the population and gaining world domination. I am
not kidding, these guys believe in this and they have seized the country to
execute the plan. Do not be surprised if as you try to take them out of
power, they wield power in an attempt to gain further control of our system
through fear, the
Some Mikey Links & Other Stuff Regarding His New
World Order Bullshit
Fascist Plot to Overthrow the United States by
the likes of Bush's grandpa Prescott and the plot to overthrow Roosevelt.
The Dark Heart Of
Fascism In The United States The Whitehouse Coup
BBC Audio Documentary
Document uncovers details of a planned coup in the USA in 1933 by right-wing
Americans.
The coup was aimed at toppling President Franklin D Roosevelt with the help of
half-a-million war veterans. The plotters, who were alleged to involve some of
the most famous families in America, (owners of Heinz, Birds Eye, Goodtea,
Maxwell Hse & George Bush’s Grandfather, Prescott) believed that their country
should adopt the policies of Hitler and Mussolini to beat the great depression.
Mike Thomson investigates why so little is known about this biggest ever
peacetime threat to American democracy.
After listening to that,
look at the next article to see how Proskauer Rose and Joseph Proskauer
(Nazi disguised as Jew) were part of the plot. We learn here how these
New World Order / Skull & Boneheads really operate. They are not
beholden to anything higher than these secret cult clubs they bond with in
gay ways (no offense to homosexuals meant). Therefore, one may ask how
could a Jew be called a Nazi, it is because Jew is second to the NWO / SB
values. They infiltrate all religions, all political parties and
virtually all social outlets, looking and appearing as one of you, with a
secret plan though. They intend to destroy that which you belong,
whether Jew, Hispanic, White, Black, Democrat, Republican, Catholic,
Christian, they want to incite you to hate each other, it feeds their goal.
Just look around, this is what plagues America.
Julian Bond continues his
persona vendetta against conservatives
NAACP Chairman Julian Bond opened the
NAACP's national convention in Milwaukee as he has other such
gatherings in the past -- by
attacking George W. Bush
and other conservatives.
The NAACP's national confab got underway
yesterday in Milwaukee. Bond took the opportunity to take swipes at
Bush and others, of course, reserving special venom for black
conservatives.
Bond opened with an attack, saying,
"Milwaukee is the home of beer, of brats and the Bradley
Foundation,"
and blasting Bush for failing to appear at the NAACP's annual
convention for
the fifth straight year.
Bond explained his reference to the Milwaukee-based Bradley
Foundation later in the speech, saying it is among entities that
fund what he called "fraudulent" civil rights organizations.
He charged that the organizations appear to back civil rights
but push school vouchers, use legal means to assault affirmative
action and try to redraw political boundaries in hopes of
preventing people of color from being elected to office.
Such organizations have had black "hucksters" on their
payrolls for 20 years, said Bond to thunderous applause.
"Like ventriloquist dummies, they speak in their puppet
master's voice, but we can see his lips moving," he said.
Similarly, Bond fired at organizations that have tried to
"seduce black clergy" to conservative causes and criticized what
he said is an attempt by the Bush administration to replace
vital public welfare programs with faith-based organizations.
He gave special importance to the continuing battle over
Bush's judicial nominees, especially a replacement for retiring
Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, saying the high court
needs another independent-minded justice like her. Too many Bush
nominees to federal judgeships have made rulings that hurt the
civil rights movement, he said, calling newly named federal
appeals court judge Janice Rogers Brown "the female Clarence
Thomas."
The former Democratic Georgia state senator blasted the
Republican-controlled U.S. Senate for failing to hold a roll
call vote on a resolution apologizing for failing to enact an
anti-lynching law first proposed 105 years ago. He named eight
Republican senators who did not co-sponsor the resolution,
saying, "If a United States senator in 2005 cannot apologize for
that, what outrage is deserving of an apology?"
Targeting the Bush administration, Bond said it was
"outsourcing torture" by sending terrorism suspects to foreign
lands and backing economic policies that have created "an
ownership society, where you're really on your own."
"They profess to being true believers, but they're really
true deceivers," he said.
Here's where and who Mike has been hanging out
with lately to turn America into garbage after ruining Foley and Lardner, then
the RNC and now Charity @ The Bradley Foundation of right wing gone to Heart of
Darkness
Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation - Michael Grebe
One of the country's largest
and most influential right-wing foundations,
the Bradley Foundation is known for its
clearly articulated political and
ideological vision.
In addition to providing
funding for a host of right-wing
organizations, Bradley contributes to
conservative and often highly controversial
scholarship, publications and "academic"
research aimed at legitimizing far-right
policy positions.
Lynde and
Harry Bradley Foundation PO Box 510860 Milwaukee, WI
53203-0153
Website:
www.bradleyfdn.org
Established: 1942
President/CEO: Michael W. Grebe
Board of Directors:
Thomas L. Rhodes (Chairman), Reed Coleman
(Vice-Chairman), Michael Grebe, William L. Armstrong,
and more. Finances:
$665,329,753 (2004) assets Grants
awarded, annually: $33,332,537 (2004)
grants awarded Employees:
20
Publications: The Lion Letter, annual
reports outlining contributions and
donations Formerly
known as: Allen-Bradley Foundation Prize Recipients 2005:
George F. Will (syndicated columnist), Ward
Connerly (anti-affirmative action, founder
of American Civil Rights Institute), Heather
McDonald (Olin fellow at the Manhattan
Institute), and Robert P. George (professor,
former presidential appointee to the U.S.
Commission on Civil Rights).
Principal Issues
The Bradley Foundation is one of the largest
philanthropic foundations responsible for the financial backing of the
right-wing agenda for nearly twenty years.
Bradley’s philanthropy supports right-wing
organizations, privatized educational programs, as well as many non-partisan
social programs and civic organizations.
Issues Bradley supports include: private
school vouchers, faith-based social services, and welfare reform.
According to Bradley, the projects sponsored
by the foundation “encourage improved government, a more vital sense of
citizenship, and a strong belief in personal responsibility.”
Bradley has been accused of underreporting
the grant amounts that it gives to many of the right-wing organizations that
it supports.
Activities
Bradley has made
right-wing inroads in academia by establishing chairmanship
positions, undergraduate and graduate programs, fellowships, and
whole departments at many prestigious universities including: Boston
College, Boston University, Bowling Green State University, Carnegie
Mellon University, Catholic University, Columbia University,
Georgetown University, George Mason University, Harvard University,
Johns Hopkins University, Kenyon College, Marquette University,
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Michigan State University,
New York University, Princeton University, Stanford University,
University of California- Berkeley, University of California- Los
Angeles, University of California- San Diego, University of Chicago,
University of Michigan, University of Notre Dame, University of
Pennsylvania, University of Virginia, University of Wisconsin, and
Washington University- St. Louis.
Bradley has supported
and in some cases, had to defend controversial right-wing recipients
of their grants, particularly Charles Murray and Dinesh D’Souza.
Charles Murray -
Murray, author of “The Bell Curve,” which argues that intelligence
is predicated on race, and “Losing Ground,” whose thesis is that
social programs should be abolished. Murray’s work was so controversial
and objectionable that the right-wing Manhattan Institute, supported
by Bradley and for which he worked, asked him to leave. However, the
Bradley Foundation stood by him because Murray, according to former
Bradley President Michael Joyce, “is one of the foremost social
thinkers in the country.” Bradley extended Murray’s $100,000 per
year grant when he went to the American Enterprise Institute. Dinesh D’Souza -
D’Souza, in his book, “The End of Racism,” attempts to absolve
Whites from discrimination against Blacks during slavery, claiming
that Blacks were too uncivilized to be a part of society anyway.
“The
reason that I am so happy that my friend Mike Grebe is here
and Mike Joyce and others from The Bradley Foundation is
because "Foundation America" must be a part of the
revitalization of our communities as well. And The Bradley
Foundation has always been willing to see different
solutions. They have been willing to challenge the status
quo. They say where we find failure, something else must
occur. And the Foundation not only has been kind and
generous with its donations, the Foundation also has been
willing to help people think anew, and I appreciate you all
coming. I am honored you're here and thanks for your good
work.”
– President George W. Bush,
speaking
at the Bradley Foundation-supported Holy Redeemer
Institutional Church of God in Christ, Milwaukee, July 2002.
American Spectator Education Foundation
("special projects" )
1
42,500
American Studies Center
1
25,000
Argus Project
1
56,250
Association of Literary Scholars and Critics
1
12,500
Becket Fund, Inc.
2
84,000
University of Wisconsin
(evaluation of Wisconsin Works welfare reform)
3
206,250
Boston College
5
144,296
Boston University
1
50,000
Boys & Girls Club of Greater Milwaukee, Inc.
1
25,000
Capital Research Center
1
28,375
Carnegie Mellon University
4
170,000
Catholic University of America
1
49,505
Cato Institute
1
37,500
Center for Individual Rights
2
70,000
Center for Parental Freedom in Education
2
50,000
Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments
1
25,000
Center for the Study of Popular Culture
3
337,500
CESA Foundation, Inc.
1
1,000
Christian Methodist Episcopal Church
1
50,000
Citizens for a Sound Economy Foundation
1
12,500
Claremont Graduate University
1
15,000
Claremont Institute for the Study of Statesmanship.
4
187,500
Claremont McKenna College
1
15,000
Collegiate Network
1
80,000
Columbia University
1
15,000
Community Enterprises of Greater Milwaukee, Inc.
4
133,000
Competitive Enterprise Institute
1
20,000
Corporation for the Advancement of Policy
Evaluation
1
25,000
Discovery World: James Lovell
2
50,000
Empire Foundation for Policy Research
1
25,000
Environmental Defense Fund
2
77,000
Esperanza Unida, Inc.
1
37,500
Ethics and Public Policy Center, Inc.
3
243,750
Family House Incorporated
1
36,250
Family Service of Milwaukee
3
150,000
Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy
Studies
2
90,000
First Stage Milwaukee
2
22,500
Florentine Opera Company, Inc.
1
50,000
Fordham University
1
25,000
Foundation for Cultural Review
3
115,000
Foundation Saint-Simon (Paris)
1
15,000
Free Congress Research and Education Foundation
2
284,000
Freedom House, Inc.
2
100,000
Fund for American Studies
1
25,000
George C. Marshall Institute
2
107,000
George Mason University Foundation
3
45,000
Georgetown University
2
30,000
Harvard University
5
107,500
Heritage Foundation
4
581,250
Houghton College
1
31,786
Hudson Institute
7
319,213
Indiana University
2
50,000
Institut Fur Die Wissenschaften Vom Menschen
1
40,000
Institute for American Values
1
50,000
Institute for Contemporary Studies
3
158,500
Institute for International Economics
1
25,000
Institute for International Studies
2
134,000
Institute for Justice
1
60,000
Institute for Policy Innovation
1
37,500
Institute on Religion and Democracy, Inc.
1
25,000
Institute on Religion and Public Life
4
296,250
Intercollegiate Studies Institute
1
45,000
International Center for Economic Growth
1
50,000
International Republican Institute
1
25,000
Johns Hopkins University
10
410,275
Kenyon College
1
15,000
Libro Libre
1
20,000
Manhattan Institute for Public Policy
2
100,000
Marquette University
2
120,000
Medical College of Wisconsin
1
20,000
MHS., Inc. Messmer High School
3
150,000
Michigan State University
2
30,000
Middle East Forum
1
22,500
Milwaukee Area Technical College Foundation, Inc.
3
150,000
Milwaukee Art Museum
1
25,000
Milwaukee Ballet Company
1
50,000
Milwaukee Brewers Student Achievers Account
1
48,251
Milwaukee County War Memorial Center, Inc.
4
350,000
Milwaukee Foundation
1
25,000
Milwaukee Kickers Soccer Club Foundation, Inc.
1
12,500
Milwaukee Repertory Theater, Inc.
2
60,000
Milwaukee Rescue Mission
1
12,500
Milwaukee School of Engineering
3
225,000
Milwaukee Youth Symphony Orchestra
1
12,500
MMAC Community Support Foundation
1
32,475
Morley Institute
1
62,500
National Affairs>
(Public Interest, National Interest)
2
175,000
National Association of Scholars
1
75,000
National Bureau of Economic Research
3
150,000
National Center for Neighborhood Enterprise
13
282,000
National Center for Policy Analysis
1
50,000
National Council for History Education, Inc.
2
64,448
National Endowment for Democracy
3
115,000
National Fatherhood Initiative
2
90,000
National Forum Foundation
1
37,500
National Strategy Information Center
2
117,500
New Citizenship Project, Inc.
1
25,000
New York University
3
65,000
Next Door Foundation
1
25,000
Nixon Center
1
37,500
Our Lady of the Lakes Catholic School
1
3,000
Pacific Research Institute for Public Policy
1
37,500
Partners Advancing Values in Education (PAVE)
3
1,700,000
Penfield Children's Center
1
20,000
Peterhouse College
1
10,000
Progressive Foundation
1
25,000
Puebla Institute
1
35,000
Reason Foundation
1
37,500
Roper Center for Public Opinion Research
2
123,000
St Camillus Ministries, Inc.
1
50,000
St. Francis Children's Center
1
20,000
St. Mary's and St. Nicholas Joint Education...
1
3,000
Salvation Army Wisconsin & Upper Michigan
1
17,500
Sand County Foundation
1
55,000
Skylight Opera Theatre Corp
1
30,000
Social Philosophy and Policy Foundation
2
84,000
St. Leo School, Inc.
1
10,000
State of Wisconsin
"legal fees in defense of const. of the amended Milwaukee School Choice
program"
1
50,000
Taliesin Preservation Commission, Inc.
1
25,000
Texas A & M University
2
82,500
Thomas Aquinas College
1
50,000
Thoreau Institute
1
22,500
TransCenter for Youth, Inc.
1
50,000
United Negro College Fund, Inc.
1
25,000
University of California-Irvine
1
33,903
University of California-Malibu
1
17,500
University of California-Berkely
1
15,000
University of Chicago
7
105,000
University of Maryland Foundation
2
78,000
University of Notre Dame
1
15,000
University of Oklahoma
1
15,000
University of Toronto
2
30,000
University of Virginia
3
45,000
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
1
75,000
UWM Foundation
2
97,900
Washington University
1
15,000
Wisconsin Center for Academically Talented Youth
2
92,500
Wisconsin Conservatory of Music
1
17,500
Wisconsin Correctional Service
1
25,000
Wisconsin Foundation for Independent Colleges, Inc.
1
12,500
Wisconsin Policy Research Institute, Inc.
1
200,000
Wisconsin Public Radio
1
1,500
Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars
1
31,500
Yale University
2
50,000
Youth Leadership Academy
3
60,000
Total unreported grants
13,058,677
Now understanding that Bradley funds Yale for his
Federalist ideology to brainwash young greed centered children who probably
would not have got into Yale without substantial daddy donations, we see a link
as to how two organizations steeped in separate plots against the United States came together into one New
World Order plot run by spoiled kids and their parents who spoil them wanting to
create wealth of kings by hording it all and screwing the middle and poor
classes.
What is frightening is that they have taken
advantage of American's who are used to saying your such a conspiracy theorist,
no plot could be in play by the rich people who are so nice to the poor.
I think the next You Tube debate question should be:
As candidate for the next President to take oath
of office to and for the People,
1.please announce any/all allegiances or oaths to
any other organization that you have sworn public or private oath to, including
any Federalist organizations, secret organizations such as Skull and Bones,
fraternal organizations, etc.
2.who are your ten largest political campaign
contributors and briefly describe the special interests behind them?
3.if you were President would you endorse
legislation that would make it a crime tried by treason for any public employee
who falsifies information or fails to disclose membership to any group that has
dissimilar interests to the People and upholding the Constitutional sworn too?
4. if you were President how would you have
handled the Libby situation which is a stain on American Justice and the
Presidency?
How much does this next piece sound like Nazi
Germany, with 9/11 leading to
Patriot Act, leading to humanitarian rights violations and the removal of Habeus
Corpus as similar, almost step by step, to the Nazi master plan.
Edited from Wikipedia (listed as a skull member
on politicalfriendster.com) from the entry on Adolph Hitler and his rise to
power). We cannot let history repeat itself.
"Those who would give up
essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty
nor safety."
Benjamin Franklin,
Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759
Having become Chancellor, Hitler
[Bush Grebe Cheney]
foiled all attempts to gain a majority in parliament and on that
basis [committed election fraud]
persuaded President Hindenburg to dissolve the Reichstag again.
Elections were scheduled for early March, but on
27 February
1933, the
Reichstag building was set on fire.[26] [9/11 Twin Towers, although there were three, the Pentagon, etc.]
Since a
Dutch independent communist
was found in the building, [not sure any bodies were ever found
of the supposed terrorists, rumble was quickly removed for new
building that is, need some spin there]
the fire was blamed on a
Communist plot ["Terrorist" Plot by deck of cards terrorists (52
thugs mainly funded by Bush's father, Hussein & Bin Laden,
America so scared of these 52 guys that we sold our freedoms to
the bs propaganda spun @ cnn, fox and payollastream media]
to
which the government reacted with the
Reichstag Fire Decree [Patriot Act]
of
28 February
which suspended basic rights, including
habeas corpus[that came later in this plot but the Patriot removed all the other
important ones first]. Under the
provisions of this decree, the
German Communist Party
and other groups were suppressed [Democrats & Republicans
alike], and communist functionaries and deputies were arrested
[shot gunned
in the face, the AG/SS at your bedside, threats to Supreme Court
justices, concentration camp Gitmoschwitz set up for dissenters]
put to flight, or murdered.
Campaigning continued, with the Nazis
making use of paramilitary violence [immediately after 9/11
attacking a country that had nothing to do with terrorists, only
Saddam who factually hated and killed terrorists, gotta give
these guys credit for spinning AL QAEDA into Iraq or 9/11 based on forged and false propaganda],
anti-Communist hysteria [anti Muslim, Chinese Poisoning the
Chinese Food, Mexican's as humans capable only of jobs Hitler's
boys won't do and anti-American dissenters who do not go along
with Decider decisions], and the
government's resources for propaganda [CNN, FOX, etc]
On election day,
6 March,
the NSDAP increased its result to 43.9% of the vote, remaining
the largest party, but its victory was marred by its failure to
secure an absolute majority, necessitating maintaining a
coalition
with the DNVP.[27]
Removal
of
remaining limits
With this combination
of legislative and
executive power, Hitler's government
further
suppressed the remaining political
opposition. The
KPDand the SPD were banned, while all other
political parties dissolved themselves.
Labour unions were merged with employers'
federations into an organisation under Nazi
control, and the autonomy of German state
governments was abolished.
Evidence to Review 09 522 721 Filing with the United States
Patent & Trademark Office claiming that per the direction of Harry I. Moatz,
Director of the Office of Enrollment & Discipline, Iviewit & Crossbow Ventures
were seeking the Commissioner of Patents to suspend the Iviewit patents based on
evidence of Fraud on the United States Patent & Trademark Office by Iviewit
former Intellectual Property attorneys, Kenneth Rubenstein, Proskauer Rose LLP,
Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolf & Schlissel, Raymond Anthony Joao, Foley & Lardner,
William J. Dick, Douglas Boehm, Steven Becker, Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman,
Thomas Coester, Norman Zafman, Farzahd Ahmini, Christopher & Weisberg PA,
Krishna Narine, Andrew Barroway, Schiffrin & Barroway and others. This led to
the Commissioner of Patents suspending certain of the Iviewit patent
applications into an infinite black hole. The form also included inventor change
forms which have gone wholly unresolved while patents are in black hole at the
United States Patent & Trademark Office.' March 10, 1900 to March 10, 2020.
These are dates on fax headers on a patent filing with the United States Patent
& Trademark Office on a Patent Application Oath & Declaration filed by Raymond
Joao. This application is a fraud and the fax headers on the page are part of
the explanation. Both fax machines' dates were changed to look like March 10,
2000 but instead come out as 3/10/1900 and 3/10/2020. This application also is
entirely different than the application signed by the inventors. 1997 07 Kenneth
Rubenstein of Proskauer Rose starts MPEGLA LLC patent pool while at Meltzer
Lippe Goldstein Wolf and Schlissel. August 08 1997 MPEGLA - note they claim to
have Department of Justice approval although the DOJ claims they have no such
approval. 1998 12 29 IVIEWIT BIZ PLAN 1999 01 08 Christopher Wheeler of
Proskauer Rose letter regarding delaying getting back to inventor Bernstein
after receiving patent disclosures. 1999 01 15 Proskauer letter regarding
Iviewit Corporation a company that disappears although bills are generated
through it. 1999 01 15 Proskauer letter regarding Iviewit Corporation, a company
that does not exist or perhaps it is another Proskauer owned entity involved in
theft of the patents through a complex shell game with identically named and
similarly named companies 1999 01 28 Letter from Iviewit to Albert Gortz of
Proskauer Rose asking why Kenneth Rubenstein was not at Proskauer Rose as was
told to Iviewit Shareholders and instead was found to be at Meltzer Lippe
Goldstein Wolf & Schlissel. 1999 02 17 - Interactive Week article where Intel
engineers are quoted as stating the Internet, at speeds under 1.5Mbps, would be
text based with banners, no video or imaging of quality at the lower bandwidths.
1999 02 18 Christopher Wheeler letter regarding Proskauer and Kenneth Rubenstein
review of patents. Rubenstein is patent expert reviewing the patents for
patentability. 1999 02 18 Christopher Wheeler of Proskauer letter regarding
Kenneth Rubenstein review of patents. 1999 02 22 Raymond Joao Patent Application
before he says he knows Iviewit, Joao said he filed in March although it was
supposed to be in January this application is missing from his bills and is in
February. 1999 02 22 Raymond Joao patent application before he says he knows
Iviewit, Joao bills for patent in March stating he is working on application.
Yet, the filing card shows it was sent in 2/99. 1999 02 PATENT FILING RECEIPT -
JOAO SAYS HE DOES NOT FILE ANYTHING UNTIL MARCH! 1999 03 02 Kenneth Rubenstein
letter to inventor Bernstein regarding how to do patents. Rubenstein states in
deposition that he does not know Bernstein, never spoke with him and that he
knew nothing about the inventions. 1999 04 16 - Christopher Wheeler gets a CD
with full screen video disclosure and in his deposition he states that at this
time he was unaware of full screen video inventions. Note how Wheeler tries to
constantly scramble attachments. 1999 04 16 Proskauer and Wheeler get info for
full screen video invention. Wheeler in deposition states he did not know of
video invention prior to Real3D meeting. This indicates he had seen the videos
and retained cd's with the inventions on them. 1999 04 26 NDA - Goldman Sachs -
Jeffrey Friedstein & Donald Kane. 1999 04 26 Proskauer opinion letter for Hassan
Miah and Earthlink investors Sky Dayton and Kevin O'Donnell. Wheeler sends the
opinion to Richard Rosman, Esq. = Contradictory evidence Wheeler states in
deposition that Proskauer never reviewed the Iviewit patents and never made any
opinions. The patent guy Miah refers to is Rubenstein. 1999 04 27 Rosman letter
to Wheeler, Hassan wants to speak to Rubenstein, the Iviewit patent attorney.
1999 04 27 Rosman to Wheeler letter showing Hassan wants opinion of Proskauer's
Rubenstein who he knows from MPEGLA, Wheeler sends a Proskauer opinion stating
their retained counsel finds it to be novel and patentable. Wheeler lies under
deposition and to Florida Bar stating he does not know anything about the
technologies and never opined. 1999 04 27 Proskauer patent opinion. 1999 05 14
Real 3D deal. 1999 05 24 Real 3D meeting. 1999 05 30 Miah letter asking to email
Iviewit patent counsel Rubenstein some questions. 1999 05 30 Miah Letter
requesting to talk with Kenneth Rubenstein. 1999 06 01 Donald G. Kane, Iviewit
Board member and member of Goldman Sachs, letter on structuring the companies.
1999 06 01 Hassan Miah letter forwarded to Rubenstein. 1999 06 03 Joao patent
filing with the United States Patent & Trademark Office with a blanked out date.
This document is later submitted to Japanese Patent Office and they reject the
document. 1999 06 09 - Armstrong Hirsh Jackoway Tyerman & Wertheimer letter to
Wheeler confirming Proskauer and Rubenstein patent opinion for Armstrong Hirsh
investors. This wholly contradicts Wheeler and Rubenstein depositions that
Proskauer did no patent work or opinions 1999 06 11 Wheeler hand notes regarding
meeting with Intel, Silicon Graphics, Inc. and Lockheed Martin at Real 3D Inc.
States disclosure of video and imaging inventions 1999 06 18 Proskauer bill for
Iviewit Corporation, a company that does not exist, we think 1999 06 24 Lewin
letter to Wheeler regarding his conflict of interests with Visual Data. Visual
Data was an early violator of their NDA and when we found out we also found out
that Lewin had undisclosed conflict. 1999 06 24 Lewin and Wheeler regarding
conflict of interest with Proskauer and Goldstein Lewin client Visual Data.
Wheeler failed to disclose they were a client of his and then after signing an
NDA Visual Data begins using the Iviewit process without authorization. 1999 06
30 - Gerald Stanley CEO of Real 3D (Intel, SGI and Lockheed) opinion on the
technologies. 1999 06 30 Real 3D Opinion and Licensing Info - We start to see
evidence of companies we never heard of. Now there appears an Iviewit LLC and an
Iviewit.com LLC. 1999 07 19 Armstrong Hirsh Jackoway Tyerman & Wertheimer letter
to Wheeler at Proskauer asking why NDA's are in iviewit inc. a company they have
no stock in or anyone else. 1999 07 23 Proskauer Opinion Letter to Huizenga
Holdings via Cris Branden. Another opinion on the technologies this time for
Wheeler's client Wayne Huizenga for investment. Huizenga invested $500,000 based
on this opinion and Wheeler claims in deposition he did not know about the
technologies and never opined. 1999 09 08 Proskauer letter by Wheeler to Lewin
for payment of bills after Huizenga funding. Wheeler in deposition states
payments were not based on funding, this letter appears to be a fraud. 1999 09
08 Proskauer Retainer almost one year after being retained, bogus document by
Utley and Wheeler. 1999 09 20 Meeting with Kenneth Rubenstein, Raymond Joao,
Brian Utley, Steven Filipek of Fish & Richardson PC. The meeting was in New York
at Rubenstein's Office, yet Rubenstein denies even knowing us other than to
refer Joao in his deposition. Filipek had questions regarding the patents he
viewed, claiming they appeared to miss the invention. 1999 Not dated Meltzer
Lippe Goldstein Wolf & Schlissel Patent Portfolio. 1999 Brian Utley resume given
to Iviewit by Wheeler (his best friend) showing false statements about his past.
He conceals former patent theft attempt from his past employer Diamond Turf
Equipment, Inc. with Wheeler and William Dick and where Utley was fired with
cause and the company was closed due to this attempted crime. Also, false claims
of his academic career. 2.19.99 Proskauer Agreement with Jenex draft. 2000 03 09
Brian Utley writes letter to Raymond Joao, after Joao is thought to be writing
patents wrong and possibly in his name. Decision is made to replace Joao with
William Dick and Foley & Lardner LLP. Utley suddenly claims Joao patents have
mistakes and major missing items. Good Guy - Bad Guy. Dick replaces Joao but
instead of correcting Joao errors, wrong info and inventors, they further
perpetuate the fraud. 2000 04 01 James Armstrong letter regarding Utley screwing
up patents. 2000 04 11 Foley and Lardner - Invitation to Correct Defects patent
filing. 2000 04 11 Foley and Lardner - Invitation to Correct Defects 2000 04 16
Iviewit letter to Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolf and Schlissel to transfer patent
docs to Foley and Lardner. 2000 05 11 - Foley and Lardner letter stating there
are problems with Joao's patents. All patents are not assigned to Iviewit
Holdings per patent office. 2000 05 11 Wachovia Securities letter from Foley &
Lardner regarding the Iviewit patents and is found later to be wholly wrong
regarding assignments and other issues according to information from the United
States Patent & Trademark Office. 2000 05 11 Wachovia Securities letter from
Foley & Lardner stating false information regarding assignments and missing
inventions. False statements for a Wachovia Private Placement by Foley and
Lardner, a securities fraud. 2000 05 19 Armstrong Hirsh Jackoway & Tyerman
investor letters further showing Rubenstein as Patent advisor now with Dick
aiding and abetting him versus Joao. 2000 05 25 Dr Christopher Taylor Consulting
Agreement 2000 05 25 Dr Christopher Taylor Consulting Agreement 2000 06 06 Foley
& Lardner request Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolf and Schlissel and Joao files,
claiming information is missing and not on file with the United States Patent &
Trademark Office. 2000 06 06 Foley & Lardner requests Meltzer Lippe Goldstein &
Schlissel files, stating that Joao has not transferred all patent applications
and files, Joao does not send a US application and tries to replace it with a
PCT. Once caught he sends file 5865-10 which he replaces patent signed by Eliot,
Jude and Zakirul with his initial provisional filing. This is the application
with fax dates of 1900 and 2020 stamped on them. 2004 06 09 Copy to Eliot
Spitzer of Paul Curran's investigation of Thomas Cahill, Chief Counsel of the
First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee, stemming from the
conflicts of Cahill Rubenstein and Steven Krane and violations of public office.
2000 06 13 Foley & Lardner Patent Portfolio. 2000 06 22 PR News Ellen DeGeneres.
"2000 06 23 iviewit.com unveils streaming video coverage of the ELLEN DEGENERES
‘Americana 2000’ Comedy Tour at SHOWBIZ EXPO. " 2000 07 07 Florida Sun Sentinel
Article regarding Iviewit and Eliot Bernstein 2000 07 22 - Proskauer marketing
letter to their clients regarding Iviewit technologies and Wheeler claims under
deposition that he did not really know about the technology and thought Iviewit
was a portal??? 2000 07 24 Foley & Lardner Patent Portfolio. 2000 07 24 Letter
from Foley and Larder stating Joao patents are defective and are missing key
info and disclosures. 2000 07 25 Dr Christopher Taylor Milwaukee Engineering
Video study showing Iviewit invention for video plays better than true
full-screen video, very cool. 2000 07 25 Dr Christopher Taylor Report Iviewit
Scaling Video Tests. 2000 07 25 Foley and Lardner attempting to switch Patent
Portfolio after Iviewit learned of Utley Patents that were written without
company authorization. 2000 07 25 Foley & Lardner Patent Portfolio. 2000 07 31
Taped Meeting Foley & Lardner where they are asked questions about the patents
discovered in Utley's name and why the patents are not assigned, etc. 2000 07 31
Transcript of Meeting with Foley and Lardner and Board Members regarding finding
patents in wrong names and assignees. 2000 07 Iviewit MTV license draft. 2000 08
02 Taped Foley & Lardner meeting part 2. 2000 08 02 Taped Foley & Lardner
meeting part 2. 2000 08 02 Taped Meeting Foley and Lardner Part 1 busted
stealing patents. 2000 08 02 Taped Meeting Foley and Lardner Part 2 busted
stealing patents. 2000 08 03 Letter From Foley & Lardner, Doug Boehm, stating he
filed patents with 10 minutes to filing and made some mistakes. 2000 08 04
Letter From James F. Armstrong finding math errors on Foley & Lardner filed
patent applications. 2000 08 04 Taped Meeting Foley & Lardner Part 1. 2000 08 04
Taped Meeting Foley & Lardner Part 1 busted stealing patents. 2000 08 09 James
F. Armstrong, Foley & Lardner Douglas Boehm letter regarding Foley patent errors
that were supposed to be filed corrected but still were filed wrong. This was
beginning to discovery that something was afoul with Foley, we had no idea the
extent at the time. 2000 08 09 Douglas Boehm of Foley & Lardner letter to
Iviewit regarding his math errors and tries to diffuse the glowing malpractice
claim and blame the problem on Eliot for Foley's errors. He is an engineer. 2000
08 09 Foley & Lardner trying to explain how math and other errors were filed in
once corrected patent applications. 2000 08 09 James Armstrong letter to Foley &
Lardner regarding the errors in the patent filings. 2000 08 25 Wheeler sends to
Rubenstein PATENT PORTFOLIO BINDERS, contradicts Rubenstein's entire deposition,
Wheeler delivers these documents to attorney Selz, after Rubenstein was already
caught perjuring himself. 2000 08 25 Wheeler sending to Rubenstein PATENT BINDER
wholly contradicts Rubenstein Wheeler and Utley Depositions, Rubenstein claims
he never received or saw Iviewit Patents ~ OUCH. 2000 08 29 Wachovia Securities
letter to Chairman of the Board regarding having done their Due Diligence, Foley
& Lardner states Iviewit Holdings, Inc. is owner and assignee of all patents.
Patent office information from OED Director Moatz contradicts this. Also in
taped meetings held, Foley then admits that not all patents are assigned. Foley
materially misrepresents to Wachovia the status of the patents and fails to list
a missing Joao application = securities fraud. 2000 08 29 Wachovia Securities
letter to Simon Bernstein, Board Member, regarding investment due diligence.
2000 09 01 NEWS ARTICLE - Grabbing the Holy Grail of Digital Webcasting -
Digital Webcast. 2000 09 05 Real 3D / Intel / RYJO letter warning of using
Iviewit technologies in violation of Real 3D / Intel NDA, RYJO tries to steal
concepts and get intellectual property in his name, aided and abetted by
Proskauer, Brian Utley and Michael Reale who thought RYJO and Ryan Huisman had
not signed an NDA. Proskauer drafted a license whereby Iviewit would license its
technology from RYJO. 2000 09 08 Shareholder James Armstrong writes letter
requesting to know where the patents assignments are and why they were not filed
based on the taped meetings with Foley & Lardner. 2000 09 08 James Armstrong
letter to the Iviewit Board asking why the assignments on the patents were not
filed. This would be shareholder fraud. 2000 09 09 Bernstein and Douglas Boehm
letters regarding bad math filed and other issues. Foley & Lardner busted here.
2000 09 09 Bernstein, Foley & Lardner letters pertaining to errors in the
patents filed. 2000 09 18 - 60 233 344 - Utley Zoom and Pan Camera patent filing
with his name on them, this contradicts Utley's deposition that he knows nothing
about a camera patent application in his name, oops. Fraud on the patent office,
fraud on Iviewit, compounded with perjury. 2000 09 20 Raymond Hersh, Iviewit
CFO, letter to Arthur Andersen stating Erika Lewin, CPA and in-house Iviewit
accountant was miffed at being accused of misleading auditors. When reviewing
the work, she seriously misstates information to auditors to keep their scam
hidden. 2000 09 20 Raymond Hersh to Arthur Andersen, Erika Lewin accused of
misleading auditors on corporate structure, it turns out to be entirely true.
2000 09 IVIEWIT, INC. of Delaware - Proskauer Rose has a confidentiality for
this company but no company exists in Delaware with this name, how Proskauer.
This may be one of the fraudulent entities that Proskauer was stealing the
patents through. 2000 09 IVIEWIT, INC. DEL PROSKAUER HAS CONFIDENTIALITY 2000 10
09 ARTHUR ANDERSEN letter regarding Proskauer having to provide proof of Iviewit
Holdings owning Iviewit Technologies, to auditors which they never produce,
instead going on a straight away course to destroy Iviewit and the records. The
audit was being conducted on behalf of Crossbow Ventures, whereby the Small
Business Administration made up 2/3 of Crossbow Ventures loans. 2000 10 09
Arthur Andersen letter requesting proof that Iviewit Holdings, Inc. is owned by
shareholders, turns out several Iviewit Holdings, Inc. exist, unraveling a
corporate shell game where the other Iviewit Holdings, Inc. are owned by
Proskauer and have stolen patents as their assets. 2000 11 27 ARTHUR ANDERSEN
letters and termination letter of Iviewit as a client in the middle of an audit
being conducted for the largest investor Crossbow Ventures in the middle of the
audit where they found all kinds of problems. 2000 11 27 Arthur Andersen
termination of audit letter, terminates Iviewit after almost one year of audit,
after accusing Erika Lewin of fraud and finding problems with the companies.
2000 11 30 Foley & Lardner attempting to switch Patent Portfolio 2. 2000 11 30
Foley & Lardner attempting to switch Patent Portfolio 3. 2000 11 30 Foley &
Lardner Patent Portfolio with Utley listed as an inventor, this is after Utley
was busted with patents in his name and Foley tries to now include these patents
we found. 2000 11 30 Foley & Lardner Patent Portfolio with 57103-122 being two
different patents. Foley's dockets get crazy as they try to adjust once caught
in the fraud. Suddenly, Utley shows up on multiple patents, replacing the
original inventors and has two patents in his own name. All of this was never
disclosed to shareholders, etc. 2000 11 30 Foley & Lardner Patent Portfolio with
57103-122 twice and different patents. 2000 11 30 Portfolio page from Foley &
Lardner does not match up and is missing now the 120 filing. 2000 12 20 Letter
to Utley asking why invention applications are missing from patents and to
modify Patents to include all things missing. 2000 12 21 John D. Calkins, Senior
Vice President New Media Business Development, Warner Bros. letter showing Utley
sending Warner Bros. the Wachovia Private Placement Memorandum. 2000 12 NEWS
RELEASE - Digital Webcast Article on Iviewit part2. 2000 Foley & Lardner Patent
Portfolio Missing Dates - Utley busted and patents start showing up on
fraudulent dockets. 2000 Iviewit income producing accounts for Encoding and
Streaming licenses. 2000 Jorge Labarga's part in the Bush v. Gore presidential
election fraud. There goes America. 2001 01 01 - Kenneth Rubenstein of
Proskauer's biography in the Wachovia Securities Private Placement Memorandum
and listed as Iviewit PATENT COUNSEL & BOARD DIRECTOR, this wholly contradicts
Rubenstein, Wheeler & Utley depositions. 2001 01 01 Rubenstein listed in
Wachovia Private Placement as patent counsel and board director, contradicts his
entire deposition. 2001 01 01 Brian Utley fraudulent resume in the Wachovia
Securities Private Placement Memorandum containing materially false and
misleading claims about his former employment where he was caught stealing
patents with none other than William J. Dick and Christopher Wheeler 2001 01 01
Wachovia Private Placement Memorandum - with bookmarks showing Rubenstein
"Iviewit patent counsel" and retained intellectual property counsel 2001 01 01
Wachovia Private Placement Memorandum Bookmarked 2001 01 17 Utley lists Kenneth
Rubenstein as patent counsel for an SBA Compliance Request for Crossbow SBIC
Loans. This completely contradicts Utley Rubenstein and Wheeler deposition
statements whereby they claim Rubenstein was never an Advisor, patent counsel
and that he was not on Board. 2001 01 17 Utley lists Kenneth Rubenstein as Board
Director for SBA loan compliance documents and to Crossbow Ventures, this is
contradicted in his deposition when he claims he never used Rubenstein as an
advisor and Rubenstein had NOTHING to do with Iviewit, oops. 2001 01 22 Kenneth
Rubenstein named as patent attorney in Wachovia Private Placement Memorandum
2001 01 Kenneth Rubenstein biography in the Wachovia Securities PPM and also
listed as Iviewit PATENT Counsel. 2001 01 Wachovia Private Placement Memorandum
- with bookmarks in color. 2001 04 14 Brian Utley fingers Kenneth Rubenstein in
the minutes of a Board Meeting calling him our advisor, this wholly contradicts
his deposition statements whereby he claims Rubenstein was never an advisor.
OOPS 2001 04 18 Brain Utley states in Board letter that Christopher Wheeler
checked with Kenneth Rubenstein as an advisor to the Board, completely
contradicting Utley Wheeler and Rubenstein depositions. 2001 04 18 Brian Utley
writes letter to Board of Directors claiming that he checked with Rubenstein as
an advisor to board. This contradicts Utley deposition statement that he never
used Rubenstein as advisor, ouch. 2001 04 21 - James Armstrong letter regarding
Brian Utley screwing up patents and company, right on the nose. 2001 05 04 Foley
& Lardner letter to Brian Utley after he is fired, regarding the patents found
in his name. This document is part of Foley & Lardner's attempt to try and make
it look legitimate after being busted. 2001 05 08 - Board Meeting.doc 2001 06 07
Brian G. Utley police report full. 2001 06 07 Brian G. Utley police report,
Embezzlement and Theft of Proprietary Systems 2001 06 12 - Book One NDA. 2001 06
12 - Book Three NDA. 2001 06 12 - Book Two NDA. 2001 06 12 - List of
Confidentialities. 2001 06 25 - David J. Colter, Vice President Technology -
Technological Operations Warner Bros. to Steve Case founder of AOLTW/WB
regarding Eliot Bernstein and the Thought Journal. 2001 07 12 Blakely Sokoloff
Taylor & Zafman portfolio shows Brian G. Utley patents, suddenly after Utley and
Foley are caught with patents in wrong places, BSTZ is retained and Foley &
Lardner sends patent portfolios that contain all kinds of new patents with all
kinds of screw ups. 2001 07 12 Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman Patent
Portfolio. 2001 07 13 Brian G. Utley police report embezzlement & theft leads to
Utley returning stolen proprietary computers. Later discovered that computers
were taken to New Jersey company owned partially by investor Tiedemann Prolow.
Violates officer and director responsibilities and Utley's non-compete. 2001 07
17 Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman Patent status report. 2001 07 26 - Blakely
Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman Power of Attorney Revocation 2. 2001 07 26 - Power of
Attorney Revocation. 2001 08 01 Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman legal opinion
and patent review revealing problems found. 2001 08 01 Blakely Sokoloff Taylor &
Zafman patent evaluation, showing Utley had patents in his own name that were
not assigned or owned by company, completely contradicting Utley deposition
statements. This is a majordomo f'up. 2001 08 01 Iviewit investor presentation
for AOL with Aidan Foley as CEO. 2001 08 04 Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman
letter to Iviewit showing Utley on patents. 2001 08 04 Blakely Sokoloff Taylor &
Zafman letter to Iviewit showing Brian G. Utley on patents. 2001 08 29 - Irell &
Manella bill for AOL license agreement they drafted. 2001 09 17 Jeffrey
Friedstein of Goldman Sachs, Power of Attorney for Blakely Sokoloff Taylor &
Zafman. 2001 09 18 Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman requests Bernstein to sign a
Power Of Attorney on behalf of Brian G. Utley, to remove him from applications
he was found to be on. Evidence shows that patent filings were made with Utley
in Japan by Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman after Utley was long gone, showing
they continued the scam and played the good guy while furthering the crimes.
2001 12 10 Crossbow Ventures attempts to call loans. 2002 01 14 AOLTW / Warner
Bros. letter stating they are using the Iviewit technologies in violation of
their NDA!!! 2002 01 15 - AOLTW / Warner Bros. letter stating technologists
checked with Kenneth Rubenstein who opined favorably on the Iviewit patents.
This contradicts Rubenstein, Wheeler and Utley's statements under deposition and
to the Florida Bar and the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First
Department Disciplinary Committee. REMEMBER, RUBENSTEIN STATES HE KNOWS NOTHING
AND PROSKAUER NEVER OPINED OR DID PATENT WORK. ooooops 2002 01 15 AOLTW / Warner
Bros. investment due diligence letter stating that Rubenstein opined favorably
on the patents. 2002 01 15 AOLTW RUBENSTEIN OPINION 2002 01 15 AOLTW RUBENSTEIN
OPINION comments 2002 03 19 - Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman Japanese Patent
Office filing for an Utley patent after he was fired over one year and they were
supposed to be removing him from patents. Iviewit did not discover this until US
Investigations led to research in Japan and this is when BSTZ was further found
to be part of the conspiracy. This evidences that BSTZ portfolios had false and
misleading information regarding these patents. 2002 03 28 Anthony Frenden
statement regarding stolen investor money and proprietary equipment. Also shows
that they tried to bribe employees with stolen cash. Funds are believed to be
investor funds including monies of the Small Business Administration. 2002 04 22
Raymond A. Joao News Article claiming Joao has ninety, yes 90, patents in his
name, this article needs to be checked for accuracy to see if it is a true
publication on that date. 2002 04 22 Raymond Joao Article Stating Joao has 90
patents in his name and showing his stolen Airplane Video patent concept, stolen
from Iviewit. 2002 04 23 William Kasser, Iviewit bookkeeper letter to Eliot
Bernstein regarding Goldstein Lewin accounting fraud on financial projections.
This represents more securities fraud and accounting fraud. 2002 04 23 Kasser to
Eliot regarding Lewin fraud on financial documents submitted to lenders. 2002 06
09 Patent Portfolio Compilation showing the Greenberg Traurig patent findings in
comparison to what Iviewit patent attorneys prior had stated on their dockets.
2002 06 09 Patent Portfolio2. 2002 06 11 Iviewit letter for Harry Moatz of the
United States Patent & Trademark Office titled "System and Method for fraud on
USPTO" and chock full of evidence. 2002 06 11 System and Method for Fraud on
USPTO. 2002 06 11 USPTO complaint filed as patent System & Method for Fraud on
the USPTO. 2002 06 17 Joao timeline of events and analysis of his documents and
the frauds committed. 2002 08 22 Brian G. Utley deposition, states all patents
are assigned to Iviewit and no patents are in his name. Contradictory evidence =
patents in his name and all patents not assigned - confirmed by USPTO and
leading to patent suspensions by commissioner. 2002 08 22 Brain G. Utley
deposition states Kenneth Rubenstein is not an advisor, nor has he ever used him
- Contradicted by Utley himself sending patent documents to Rubenstein and
naming him as an advisor to the Board and other evidence. 2002 08 23 Brian G.
Utley deposition that states William J. Dick was the attorney that wrote patents
into Utley's name at his former employer Diamond Turf Equipment, Inc. which led
to that business closing due to the thefts. Christopher Wheeler through
Proskauer, set up the company where the Utley stolen patents were transferred.
Wheeler lies to the Florida Bar and states he never did work for Brain Utley,
then gets caught lying in his deposition. Writes apology for his perjury to the
Florida Bar. All three of them failed to disclose the prior patent heist to
anyone. 2002 08 23 Brian Utley deposition on Diamond Turf Equipment, Inc. and
the patent dispute he had over the stolen intellectual properties with his
former employer. 2002 08 23 Brian G. Utley deposition statement stating
Christopher Wheeler knew about Diamond Turf Equipment, Inc. patent dispute.
Wheeler while recommending Utley as President of Iviewit failed to disclose this
little patent theft or that he was involved. William Dick never discloses his
involvement when they bring him in to cover up Joao's crimes. The concealment
and falsifying Utley's resume shows intent and that they were a prior criminal
enterprise. Wheeler delivers Utley resume to the shareholders and completely
fabricates Utley's past. 2002 08 23 Brian G. Utley deposition statement that
William J. Dick never filed the patents for Diamond Turf Equipment but Dick, in
his response the Virginia Bar, states he filed the patents in Utley's name to a
company Christopher Wheeler at Proskauer had set up, Premiere Connection. The
Virginia Bar despite being provided the evidence of such false statements fails
to take action. 2002 08 23 Brain G. Utley deposition statement that he knew
nothing about a Zoom and Pan Camera patent application. Contradictory evidence =
Patent Application for Zoom and Pan on a Digital Camera filed in Utley's name
without assignment to the company. 2002 08 23 Brian G. Utley deposition
statement that there were patent disputes at Diamond Turf which he failed to put
in his resume which led to his being fired by the owner Monte Friedkin and
forcing the closure of Friedkin's company. Where Dick, Wheeler and Utley were
all involved shows a criminal enterprise of patent thieves. 2002 08 23 Brian G.
Utley deposition statement that Christopher Wheeler never represented him.
Wheeler states that he did not ever represent Utley to the Florida Bar and then
in deposition states that he formed a company for Utley. The reason they want to
hide this corporate formation is that it is the company where the stolen patents
from Diamond TE went 2002 08 23 Utley deposition states he did not graduate
college, this contradicts his sworn statements in a Wachovia Private Placement
that he said he did graduate college 2002 09 20 Greenberg Traurig Proposal
Patents 2002 09 20 Greenberg Traurig Proposal Patents. 2002 10 16 Notice of
Appeal on Jorge Labarga case. 2002 10 25 Kenneth Rubenstein sworn statement to
Judge Jorge Labarga trying to get out of his deposition and claiming he does not
know anything about Iviewit. 2002 10 25 Kenneth Rubenstein statement to Judge
Jorge Labarga, complete false statements to avoid a deposition at his law firms
lawsuit against Iviewit for a bill. 2002 11 20 Kenneth Rubenstein full
deposition with Exhibits CERT. I KNOW NOTHING! 2002 11 20 Kenneth Rubenstein
deposition regarding his being unsure a conflict check was done by Proskauer.
This would have prevented MPEGLA from using the Iviewit processes disclosed to
Rubenstein as Iviewit patent counsel, while he was a founder and patent counsel
& reviewer for MPEGLA LLC 2002 11 20 Kenneth Rubenstein deposition statement
that he does not have Iviewit patent documents = Contradictory evidence is a
letter showing Christopher Wheeler sending him the entire Iviewit Patent
Portfolio. 2002 11 21 Christopher Wheeler deposition stating he does not know
about the video inventions = Contradictory evidence shows that Wheeler was sent
video invention disclosures and then later in his deposition he claims to have
been at video disclosure meeting with Intel and Real3D engineers. 2002 11 21
Christopher Wheeler deposition does not know about video invention. 2002 11 21
Christopher Wheeler deposition regarding no conflicts check, neither him or
Kenneth Rubenstein are sure a conflicts check was ever done. 2002 11 21
Christopher Wheeler deposition statement that Iviewit was a portal, he didn't
know about the technologies and that Proskauer was hired for portal services and
not to patent the inventions. Contradictory evidence is overwhelming. 2002 11 21
Wheeler deposition statement that no Proskauer conflict of interest check was
done. 2002 11 21 Wheeler deposition statement that Proskauer and Christopher
Wheeler represented Brian G. Utley in the past. They failed to disclose that
this former work by Proskauer and Wheeler was for a company where stolen patents
went at Utley's former employer. Contradictory evidence = Wheeler's statements
under deposition and to the Florida Bar that conflict, constituting perjury.
Also, Utley states in deposition that Wheeler never did work for him. "Who's on
first." 2002 11 21 Christopher Wheeler deposition stating Proskauer never opined
on the technologies or had anything to do with patents. Contradictory evidence =
Wheeler/Proskauer patent opinions for the investors. Wachovia Private Placement
showing Wheeler and Rubenstein on the Board of Directors and claiming Kenneth
Rubenstein and Proskauer are retained patent counsel. 2003 01 11 Palm Beach Post
Article stating Crossbow Ventures sold an Iviewit company! Problem -- Crossbow
Ventures do not own the company to sell and failed to tell investors about it =
securities fraud. Evidence shows that SBA loans were written down and then the
securities were sold = fraud on the SBA. 2003 01 11 Palm Beach Post Article
Crossbow Sells Iviewit. 2003 01 11 Palm Beach Post Article Crossbow Sells
Iviewit2 2003 01 11 Palm Beach Post Article Crossbow Sells Iviewit2. 2003 01 28
Proskauer v. Iviewit, Judge Jorge Labarga, Counter Complaint was filed but
Labarga refused it claiming attorneys that were initially found representing
Iviewit with no authority basically waived any rights to such. It was not
learned until much later that the suit involved fraudulent companies set up by
Proskauer with stolen intellectual properties in them and that the suit was part
of a scheme with a fraudulent federal bankruptcy filing, to seize the patents in
a shell game. 2003 01 31 Eliot Bernstein deposition, this document is well worth
the read as Eliot Bernstein deposes the deposition takers from Proskauer, note,
Proskauer is continuously representing themselves in all lawsuits and all bar
complaints. 2003 02 25 Raymond Joao 9th district original attorney misconduct
complaint - somehow gets transferred to the wrong district, the Supreme Court of
New York Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee
for prosecution with the Proskauer attorney misconduct complaints, although Joao
is registered elsewhere. 2003 02 26 Original attorney misconduct complaint
against Proskauer and Kenneth Rubenstein filed at the Supreme Court of New York
Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee. 2003 02
26 Original Rubenstein Bar Action 2003 02 26 Original Florida Bar Complaint
against Proskauer and Christopher Wheeler. 2003 03 20 Judge Jorge Labarga Court
Order for Kenneth Rubenstein and Christopher Wheeler to return to take further
deposition to answer previously unanswered questions that they tried to refuse
to come back too after being caught lying and perjuring themselves in the first
part. The trial is thrown before they can be deposed again. 2003 04 07 -
Christopher Wheeler perjured statement to the Florida Bar regarding Brian G.
Utley. Wheeler in a footnote in a response tries to minimize the extent of the
lie he is caught in. 2003 04 07 - Christopher Wheeler perjured Florida Bar
statement. Florida Bar while cognizant of the crime of perjury in an official
proceeding fails to take any action, although Wheeler is caught beyond a
reasonable doubt and apologizes for his lies in writing. Oh yeah, the President
of the Florida Bar turns out to be Wheeler's brother, James Wheeler, underling
at the law firm of Broad and Cassel and fails to disclose such while receiving
documents from Iviewit to investigate. 2003 04 07 - Christopher Wheeler and
Proskauer's response to the bar complaint which is tendered by Matthew Triggs of
Proskauer who acted in violation of his public office with the Florida Supreme
Court agency The Florida Bar. 2003 04 07 - Christopher Wheeler and Proskauer's
response to The Florida Bar bar complaint which was tendered by Matthew Triggs
of Proskauer who acted in conflict of interest and violation of public office
with his Supreme Court of Florida Bar Position. 2003 04 08 Raymond Joao's
response to the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department
Departmental Disciplinary Committee. Joao actually tries to accuse Iviewit of
stealing his inventions. Coocoo. 2003 04 08 Raymond Joao's response to the New
York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary
Committee. Joao actually tries to accuse Iviewit of stealing his inventions.
Coocoo. 2003 04 11 - Kenneth Rubenstein and Proskauer's response to the bar
complaint filed at the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First
Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee authored by Proskauer Rose
attorney Steven C. Krane, who acted in conflict of interest and violation of
public offices with the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First
Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee and also in violation of his role
as former President of the NY Bar Association precluding him from handling any
bar complaints within a one year blackout and where he had personal and
professional interests he also violated his ethics. This sucks for like the guy
who parades around as being an ethics leader, saddest day in the life of
Socrates, rollin' in his grave. 2003 04 11 - Kenneth Rubenstein response
authored by Proskauer attorney Steven C. Krane. Krane was former New York State
Bar Association President and former law clerk to New York Supreme Court
Appellate Division, Krane was clerk for Chief Judge of New York, Judith Kaye who
is also in conflict and abuse of public office as Kaye is married to a Porksour
partner, who recently died, Stephen R. Kaye and Judith failed to take any
actions when notified of the crimes in the courts she oversees!!!!! 2003 04 16
Supreme Court of New York First Department Disciplinary Committee regarding
reply to Raymond Joao complaint. 2003 04 30 Eliot Bernstein / Iviewit response
to Christopher Wheeler Florida Bar Complaint BOOKMARKED. Wheeler's response it
is later learned was tendered by his partner Matthew Triggs who was prohibited
from representing any bar complaints due to his official position with the
Florida Bar' 2003 04 30 Eliot Bernstein / Iviewit response to Christopher
Wheeler Florida Bar Complaint BOOKMARKED. Wheeler's response it is later learned
was tendered by his partner Matthew Triggs who was prohibited from representing
any bar complaints due to his official position with the Florida Bar. BOOKMARKED
2003 04 30 P. Stephen Lamont Rebuttal to Christopher Wheeler's response to the
Florida Bar complaint filed against him. BOOKMARKED 2003 05 05 Florida Bar
Receipt Filing 2003 05 06 Proskauer Florida Bar Receipt Filing 2003 05 23
Christopher Wheeler Admits Perjury and False Statements made to The Florida Bar
in his response. Of course Triggs, acting in conflict and violation of public
office makes the perjurious statement a footnote. 2003 05 23 Christopher Wheeler
Admits Perjury and False Statements made to The Florida Bar in his response. Of
course Triggs, acting in conflict and violation of public office makes the
perjurious statement a footnote. 2003 05 23 Christopher Wheeler Response to
Florida Bar Rebuttal 2, tendered by Matthew Triggs who acted in violation of his
Florida Supreme Court Bar position in representing Wheeler. 2003 05 23 Wheeler
Response to Rebuttal Partial 2003 05 26 Iviewit Rebuttal to Raymond Joao
attorney misconduct complaint. 1753 Pages BOOKMARKED 2003 06 03 Iviewit Rebuttal
to Wheeler 2nd Response to the Florida Bar complaint filed against him.
BOOKMARKED 2003 06 03 Iviewit Rebuttal to Wheeler Florida Bar Complaint 2nd
Response Final 2003 06 04 Lorraine Christine Hoffman of The Florida Bar cover
letter regarding Wheeler bar complaint. 2003 06 13 Kenneth Rubenstein affidavit
to his deposition, where he writes in his answers without precedence, rhythm or
reason. Judge Jorge Labarga orders Rubenstein to return to deposition and answer
the questions he refused the first time after walking out of his deposition.
Remember this is his deposition in his firms law suit. 2003 07 01 Florida Bar
Response Wheeler Complaint trying to claim that the federal state and
international crimes presented them were more a civil matter. 2003 07 02 Iviewit
Rebuttal to Kenneth Rubenstein's response to the New York Supreme Court
Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee. Final
2200+ Pages ALL 2003 07 04 Mitchell Welsch Letter of Understanding for Schiffrin
and Barroway deal that went awry. 2003 07 16 Signed Letter of Understanding
"LOU" between Iviewit & Schiffrin & Barroway for two million dollars and full
funding of all legal counsel in all legal actions. One must ask where are they
and the story can be found in complaints filed at the Pennsylvania State Bar.
2003 07 18 - Krishna Narine from Schiffrin & Barroway taking over patents and
getting his family member Weisberg of Christopher & Weisberg, PA involved. 2003
07 18 - Krishna Narine from Schiffrin & Barroway taking over patents and getting
his family member Weisberg of Christopher & Weisberg PA involved. 2003 07 22 -
Krishna Narine of Schiffrin & Barroway transfers patents to Christopher &
Weisberg. 2003 07 22 - Overnight and billing for transfer of patents to
Christopher & Weisberg. 2003 07 22 Bernstein confirms patent transfer to
Weisberg. 2003 07 24 Crossbow Ventures and DiStream Interactive deal. 2003 07 24
DiStream Interactive draft term sheet with Iviewit Inc. and Iviewit Holdings
never executed as it was a bad deal and it was found that DiStream CEO Royal
O'Brien had rewritten Iviewit patents into his name. 2003 07 25 Steven M. Selz
of Selz & Muvdi letter regarding stand down orders in Labarga litigation because
Schiffrin and Barroway operating under the signed LOU asked to replace him in
the case. 2003 07 25 Steven M. Selz letter to Schiffrin & Barroway regarding
stand down as counsel orders. 2003 07 28 Proskauer draft settlement that had so
many flaws no one could sign it without repercussions of committing fraud
against the Shareholders and they would not put in clause regarding the patents,
that stated if the patents were damaged it was their liability. 2003 08 01 Judge
Jorge Labarga grants Schiffrin & Barroway motion to withdraw as counsel, in a
surprise move at a rehearing scheduling days after the original trial was
cancelled by Labarga with no notice to Steven Selz, Iviewit's counsel or
Iviewit. This leaves Iviewit with no counsel on the eve trial, two law firms
dismissed by Labarga whereby both said the other would be representing Iviewit.
2003 08 01 Judge Jorge Labarga grants Steven M. Selz motion to withdraw as
counsel for the upcoming trial after Selz states Schiffrin & Barroway who signed
a binding Letter of Understanding would be handling the case. Then Schiffrin &
Barroway submits a surprise motion to withdraw and Labarga grants it, leaving
Iviewit with no counsel. 2003 08 01 Judge Jorge Labarga regarding Steven M.
Selz's notice to withdraw and trial rescheduling. 2003 08 01 Schiffrin &
Barroway notice to withdraw as counsel from Iviewit, breaching their binding LOU
and legal retainer. 2003 08 01 Steven M. Selz withdrawal as counsel in Proskauer
v. Iviewit. 2003 08 02 - Iviewit letter to Krishna Narine of Schiffrin &
Barroway on Christopher & Weisberg PA failure to file response on patent after
taking Iviewit as a client. 2003 08 02 - Iviewit letter to Christopher &
Weisberg regarding their being retained by Schiffrin & Barroway, getting the
patents transferred by Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman and then blowing off a
patent filing in violation of Title 35 USC and the Federal Patent bar, for this
they were added to the complaints with Harry I. Moatz, Director of the United
States Patent & Trademark Office - Office of Enrollment & Discipline. 2003 08 04
Christopher & Weisberg withdrawal as counsel and attempts to claim they were not
acting as counsel for Iviewit which is wholly untrue as they were retained by a
family relative from Schiffrin & Barroway, Krishna Narine. This seriously
jeopardizes Iviewit with USPTO on patent filings. 2003 08 05 - Iviewit response
to Christopher & Weisberg email stating they had missed a patent filing while
being retained counsel. 2003 08 08 Federal Bureau of Investigation West Palm
Beach Florida, original complaint filing with Glenda Moffat. 2003 08 12 Andrew
Barroway of Schiffrin & Barroway Pennsylvania Bar complaint. 2003 08 13 Iviewit
demand letter to Schiffrin & Barroway for performance under signed and binding
LOU. 2003 08 13 Schiffrin & Barroway demand for performance letter. 2003 08 14
Christopher Wheeler involvement at Florida Atlantic University Foundation
Scandal & Fuzion Fraud. Utley and Wheeler controlled FAU foundation when scandal
took place. Wheeler was reported taking tax deduction on his portion of
contribution to a Corvette for past president. 2003 08 28 Boca Raton Police
Written Statement regarding stolen cash from Iviewit including funds from
Tiedemann Prolow investment, Crossbow Ventures investments which were 2/3 Small
Business Administration loans. 2003 09 02 - Boca Raton Police Department Written
Statement regarding stolen intellectual property given to Detective Robert
Flechaus who failed to perform his investigative duties and buried the
complaints instead. 2003 09 02 Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division
First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee letter that was lost for
months regarding holding off investigation of Kenneth Rubenstein, Proskauer
Rose, Raymond Joao and Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolf & Schlissel. 2003 09 02
Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department Departmental
Disciplinary Committee response regarding Raymond Joao, Proskauer Rose, Meltzer
Lippe Goldstein Wolf & Schlissel and Kenneth Rubenstein bar complaints which
comes way late as it was lost in the mail. The document is probably fraudulent
and tries to dismiss the complaints as a civil matter, although they ignore the
state, federal and international crimes against the government and foreign
nations exposed in the complaints. 2003 09 17 United States Patent & Trademark
Office - Office of Enrollment & Discipline written statement to Harry I Moatz,
Director of the OED. 2003 09 19 Motion for mistrial in the Proskauer v. Iviewit
case based on the insane actions of Judge Jorge Labarga. 2003 09 23 United
States Patent & Trademark Office - Office of Enrollment & Discipline written
statement to Harry I Moatz, Director of the OED. Corrected. 2003 09 23 Virginia
Bar Complaint filed against William J. Dick and Foley & Lardner for Dick's
patent crimes. 2003 09 25 Certified letter to Harry I. Moatz and William Dick.
2003 09 26 - Iviewit letter to The Florida Bar, that civil case was over which
is why the failed to investigate originally, although Florida Bar rules prohibit
delaying investigation into bar complaints because of civil cases. 2003 09 02
Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department Departmental
Disciplinary Committee letter that was lost for months regarding holding off
investigation of Kenneth Rubenstein, Proskauer Rose, Raymond Joao and Meltzer
Lippe Goldstein Wolf & Schlissel. 2003 10 02 - Letter to Florida Bar - Missing
2003 10 02 - Letter to Florida Bar - Not Signed Missing Exhibits 2003 10 02
Iviewit letter to The Florida Bar to re-file the complaint against Christopher
Clark Wheeler as the civil litigation was completed. 2003 10 02 Iviewit letter
to The Florida Bar to re-file the complaint against Christopher Clark Wheeler as
the civil litigation was completed. 2003 10 08 Virginia Bar response to William
J. Dick and Foley & Lardner bar complaint requesting more information. 2003 10
08 Virginia Bar response to William J. Dick and Foley & Lardner bar complaint
requesting more information. 2003 10 13 - Florida Bar letter by Lorraine
Christine Hoffman attempting to delay Christopher Wheeler bar complaint
investigation still claiming it was before a civil court. Hoffman knew that
Judge Labarga had limited the Proskauer v. Iviewit case to strictly billing
issues and denied a counter complaint that tried to bring in the patent crimes
and other crimes committed. Hoffman ignores these facts and continues to protect
Wheeler, at the time it was unknown that the President of The Florida Bar, Kelly
Overstreet Johnson worked for Wheeler's brother James Wheeler at Broad & Cassel
a Florida law firm. Johnson conceals the conflict while accepting information on
the Wheeler complaint. 2003 10 13 The Florida Bar letter again delaying wheeler
complaint based on civil litigation. 2003 10 15 Judicial Qualifications
Commission of Florida complaint against Judge Jorge Labarga letter from Kennerly.
2003 10 30 Department of Justice complaint filed against Rubenstein and others
for antitrust violations including their MPEGLA patent pooling scheme and claims
that the DOJ approved the scheme. 2003 10 30 Department of Justice complaint
filed against Rubenstein and others for antitrust violations including their
MPEGLA patent pooling scheme and claims that the DOJ approved the scheme. 2003
10 30 Fax receipt for William J. Dick Virginia bar complaint response. 2003 11
09 AICPA Goldstein Lewin & Co. complaint against Erika & Gerald Lewin. 2003 11
10 - The Florida Bar letter response refusing to start investigation of
Christopher Clark Wheeler of Proskauer and his bar complaint. 2003 11 10 - The
Florida Bar letter response refusing to start investigation of Christopher Clark
Wheeler of Proskauer and his bar complaint. 2003 11 14 P. Stephen Lamont letter
to Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman asking where the intellectual property
docket is. 2003 11 14 P. Stephen Lamont letter to Blakely Sokoloff Taylor &
Zafman asking where the intellectual property docket is. 2003 11 17 - Final
Judgment against Iviewit in the Proskauer v. Iviewit case. Judgment was issued
by Judge Jorge Labarga, after he cancelled the first trial with no notice to
Iviewit or either of their law firms, Selz & Muvdi and Schiffrin & Barroway. At
the rescheduling hearing both Schiffrin & Barroway and Selz Muvdi withdrew as
counsel stating the other would be handling the case. Labarga let both go
instead, despite the fact that Schiffrin & Barroway had signed a binding
LOU/Legal Retainer agreement to represent Iviewit at the case. This forced
Iviewit to have no counsel and days later Labarga ruled a default on Iviewit for
failure to retain replacement counsel. Iviewit could not find counsel that fast
in a almost three year case and Schiffrin and Selz refused to turn over
necessary files needed to find new counsel or file an appeal. 2003 11 17 - Final
Judgment against Iviewit in the Proskauer v. Iviewit case. Judgment was issued
by Judge Jorge Labarga, after he cancelled the first trial with no notice to
Iviewit or either of their law firms, Selz & Muvdi and Schiffrin & Barroway. At
the rescheduling hearing both Schiffrin & Barroway and Selz Muvdi withdrew as
counsel stating the other would be handling the case. Labarga let both go
instead, despite the fact that Schiffrin & Barroway had signed a binding
LOU/Legal Retainer agreement to represent Iviewit at the case. This forced
Iviewit to have no counsel and days later Labarga ruled a default on Iviewit for
failure to retain replacement counsel. Iviewit could not find counsel that fast
in a almost three year case and Schiffrin and Selz refused to turn over
necessary files needed to find new counsel or file an appeal. 2003 11 19 -
Iviewit letter to Eric Turner of The Florida Bar requesting a review of the
Lorraine Christine Hoffman determination. 2003 11 19 - Iviewit letter to Eric
Turner of The Florida Bar requesting a review of the Lorraine Christine Hoffman
determination. 2003 11 20 - Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman Intellectual
Property portfolio showing Japanese Patents and Utley Patents. 2003 11 20 - The
Florida Bar re-examination notice stating they were reviewing the prior decision
regarding the Christopher Wheeler bar complaint. 2003 11 20 - The Florida Bar
re-examination notice stating they were reviewing the prior decision regarding
the Christopher Wheeler bar complaint. 2003 11 22 - European Patent Office
response to formal office action which exposes the fraud that Blakely Sokoloff
Taylor & Zafman was supposed to be exposing to them and correcting but never
did. This document turns up later to be sent by Chris Mercer of the Institute of
Professional Representatives before the European Patent Office who while
investigating the EPO filings but the document has been tampered with and is
missing the exhibits, etc. 2003 11 23 - P010 European Patent Office response to
office action filed by Martyn Molyneaux of WILDMAN, HARROLD, ALLEN & DIXON LLP
whereby Molyneaux confirms that he filed the fraud charges but instead it
appears he filed a fraudulent document without most of the exhibits. 2003 11 23
- P010 European Patent Office response to office action filed by Martyn
Molyneaux of WILDMAN, HARROLD, ALLEN & DIXON LLP whereby Molyneaux confirms that
he filed the fraud charges but instead it appears he filed a fraudulent document
without most of the exhibits. 2003 11 24 Patent Portfolio of Blakely Sokoloff
Taylor & Zafman. 2003 11 25 Response to Pennsylvania Bar regarding complaints
against Schiffrin & Barroway. 2003 12 11 Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman writes
a letter regarding the missing patent files sent by Foley & Lardner. 2003 12 11
Iviewit letter to Florida Judicial Qualification Commission, Brooke Kennerly
response Final EIB PSL signed. 2003 Letter from Iviewit to Blakely Sokoloff
Taylor & Zafman regarding the patent matters. 2003 10 30 Iviewit response to
Virginia Bar letter regarding the bar complaint filed against William J. Dick
and Foley & Lardner. 2004 01 06 Brian G. Utley declaration for William Dick's
Virginia Bar response. This statement is contradicted by Utley's statements in
his own deposition regarding the filing by Dick of stolen patent from Utley's
former employer Diamond Turf Equipment, Inc. It is later learned that
Christopher Wheeler had set up a company, Premiere Connections, for Utley to
house the patents Dick was stealing with Utley from Utley's employer Monte
Friedkin. This again shows a criminal enterprise with a prior history of patent
crimes. 2004 01 08 - William J. Dick statement to Virginia Bar showing his
involvement with Brian G. Utley at Diamond Turf Equipment, Inc. and claims that
he filed patents with the United States Patent & Trademark Office which
contradicts Utley deposition statements that patents were never filed. Although
these fraudulent statements are exposed to the Virginia Bar they fail to do
anything to question Dick regarding these crimes, including falsifying
information to the Virginia Bar. 2004 01 08 - Foley & Lardner patent portfolio
included as part of William J. Dick's Virginia Bar complaint. This IP docket was
later submitted to Harry I Moatz of the United States Patent & Trademark Office
whereby Moatz found many inconsistencies with the IP docket versus what was one
file. This leads Moatz to get patents suspended by the Commissioner of Patents.
Although the Virginia Bar was notified of Moatz's actions and the fraudulent IP
docket they failed to investigate the matters. 2004 01 08 William J. Dick's
statement to the Virginia Bar showing that Premiere Connections received patents
Dick wrote into Utley's name and sent to his home, inventions of Utley's
employer, Premiere Connections turns out to be the company that Christopher
Wheeler of Proskauer Rose set up for Brian G. Utley. Wheeler later lies and
perjures himself by saying he never did work for Utley to conceal this company
from the Florida Bar action. Wheeler lies to the Florida Bar that he never did
work for Utley and then contradicts himself in deposition, after Utley also
contradicts Wheeler's lies. This ties Utley, Wheeler and Dick together in former
theft of patents from Utley's prior employer of which all three fail to disclose
this matter to the Iviewit Shareholders or Board. 2004 01 09 - Response to
Thomas J. Cahill, Chief Counsel, New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First
Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee regarding the attorney misconduct
complaint against Proskauer Rose, Kenneth Rubenstein, Raymond Joao and Meltzer
Lippe Goldstein Wolf & Schlissel being delayed due to a lost letter he
supposedly had sent. This is right before Iviewit learns that the attorney for
Proskauer is a Proskauer partner, in the IP department no less, who just happens
to be a member of the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department
Departmental Disciplinary Committee. 2004 01 09 - Response to Thomas J. Cahill,
Chief Counsel, New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department
Departmental Disciplinary Committee regarding the attorney misconduct complaint
against Proskauer Rose, Kenneth Rubenstein, Raymond Joao and Meltzer Lippe
Goldstein Wolf & Schlissel being delayed due to a lost letter he supposedly had
sent. This is right before Iviewit learns that the attorney for Proskauer is a
Proskauer partner, in the IP department no less, who just happens to be a member
of the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department Departmental
Disciplinary Committee. 2004 01 09 Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman letter
response to Thomas Coester, charging Blakely with crimes and being a
conspirator. 2004 01 09 Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman letter response to
Thomas Coester, charging Blakely with crimes and being a conspirator. 2004 01 09
Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman letter response to Thomas Coester, charging
Blakely with crimes and being a conspirator. 2004 01 13 Department of Justice
Antitrust Division Response to Iviewit complaint. Iviewit does not respond to
this as investigations begin at the United States Patent & Trademark Office.
What is most interesting to note is that the DOJ claims that it never approved
the MPEGLA LLC licensing scheme that it only issued a business review letter.
This makes MPEGLA LLC claim that the DOJ gave them approval false and misleading
and allows them to sell to the public they have DOJ approval for this patent
pooling scheme. What is more interesting is that the DOJ had prior consistently
broke up patent pools for violations of antitrust laws. 2004 01 13 Department of
Justice Antitrust Division Response to Iviewit complaint. Iviewit does not
respond to this as investigations begin at the United States Patent & Trademark
Office. What is most interesting to note is that the DOJ claims that it never
approved the MPEGLA LLC licensing scheme that it only issued a business review
letter. This makes MPEGLA LLC claim that the DOJ gave them approval false and
misleading and allows them to sell to the public they have DOJ approval for this
patent pooling scheme. What is more interesting is that the DOJ had prior
consistently broke up patent pools for violations of antitrust laws. 2004 01 20
Eric Montel Turner from The Florida Bar response to not investigate Christopher
Clark Wheeler and Turner opines that Proskauer did no patent work for Iviewit
having not formally investigated the Wheeler complaint, this is a violation of
the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar which precludes Florida Bar from siding
with either parties claims without formal investigation. A bar complaint is
filed against Turner for this but the Florida Bar dismisses it without formally
docketing or disposing of it, claiming it was an employer/employee matter. Even
that should have been formally docketed and disposed of but it was not. 2004 01
20 Eric Montel Turner from The Florida Bar response to not investigate
Christopher Clark Wheeler and Turner opines that Proskauer did no patent work
for Iviewit having not formally investigated the Wheeler complaint, this is a
violation of the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar which precludes Florida Bar
from siding with either parties claims without formal investigation. A bar
complaint is filed against Turner for this but the Florida Bar dismisses it
without formally docketing or disposing of it, claiming it was an
employer/employee matter. Even that should have been formally docketed and
disposed of but it was not. 2004 01 21 - William J. Dick of Foley & Lardner's
Virginia Bar response whereby Dick claims he filed patents for Brian G. Utley
contradicting Utley's deposition statement stating patents were never filed for
inventions of his former employer. 2004 01 21 - William J. Dick and Foley &
Lardner response to his Virginia Bar complaint. Full of lies. 2004 01 25 Iviewit
response to Eric Montel Turner of The Florida Bar regarding the failure of the
Florida Bar to reopen the Wheeler Complaint and to retract and redact statements
regarding Proskauer not having done patent work for Iviewit which is patently
false. 2004 01 25 Iviewit response to Eric Montel Turner of The Florida Bar
regarding the failure of the Florida Bar to reopen the Wheeler Complaint and to
retract and redact statements regarding Proskauer not having done patent work
for Iviewit which is patently false. "2004 01 27 WILDMAN, HARROLD, ALLEN & DIXON
LLP letter stating that Martyn Molyneaux left the firm." "2004 01 27 WILDMAN,
HARROLD, ALLEN & DIXON LLP letter stating that Martyn Molyneaux left the firm."
2004 01 28 Iviewit response to Eric Montel Turner of The Florida Bar regarding
his decision not to reopen the Christopher Clark Wheeler case despite massive
evidence against Wheeler. 2004 02 02 Eric Montel Turner of the Florida Bar
response to Iviewit regarding his stating that he was the final arbiter of
Florida Bar complaints and stating that it would be passed to the next highest
level of review which he had stated did not exist, trying to get Iviewit to give
up and not press the claims with the Florida Bar. 2004 02 04 - Iviewit response
to Eric Montel Turner response to the Iviewit 2004 02 02 letter. 2004 02 04 -
Iviewit response to Eric Montel Turner response to the Iviewit 2004 02 02
letter. 2004 02 11 - 09 587 026 Filing with the United States Patent & Trademark
Office claiming that per the direction of Harry I. Moatz, Director of the Office
of Enrollment & Discipline, Iviewit & Crossbow Ventures were seeking the
Commissioner of Patents to suspend the Iviewit patents based on evidence of
Fraud on the United States Patent & Trademark Office by Iviewit former
Intellectual Property attorneys, Kenneth Rubenstein, Proskauer Rose LLP, Meltzer
Lippe Goldstein Wolf & Schlissel, Raymond Anthony Joao, Foley & Lardner, William
J. Dick, Douglas Boehm, Steven Becker, Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman, Thomas
Coester, Norman Zafman, Farzahd Ahmini, Christopher & Weisberg PA, Krishna
Narine, Andrew Barroway, Schiffrin & Barroway and others. This led to the
Commissioner of Patents suspending certain of the Iviewit patent applications
into an infinite black hole. The form also included inventor change forms which
have gone wholly unresolved while patents are in black hole at the United States
Patent & Trademark Office.' 2004 02 14 Eric M. Turner of the Florida Bar 3rd
response regarding the Christopher Clark Wheeler and Proskauer Rose LLP
complaint. Turner states that when he told us he was the final arbiter and there
was no higher level, which was learned to be false, that he meant the Florida
Bar was the highest level and that the Florida Supreme Court would not hear the
matter. This statement is false as the Florida Supreme Court did hear the matter
and then declined to hear it??? 2004 03 02 - Iviewit letter to Stephen Warner of
Crossbow Ventures regarding the patent problems and fraud that was going on at
Iviewit. 2004 03 03 - 09 522 721 Filing with the United States Patent &
Trademark Office claiming that per the direction of Harry I. Moatz, Director of
the Office of Enrollment & Discipline, Iviewit & Crossbow Ventures were seeking
the Commissioner of Patents to suspend the Iviewit patents based on evidence of
Fraud on the United States Patent & Trademark Office by Iviewit former
Intellectual Property attorneys, Kenneth Rubenstein, Proskauer Rose LLP, Meltzer
Lippe Goldstein Wolf & Schlissel, Raymond Anthony Joao, Foley & Lardner, William
J. Dick, Douglas Boehm, Steven Becker, Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman, Thomas
Coester, Norman Zafman, Farzahd Ahmini, Christopher & Weisberg PA, Krishna
Narine, Andrew Barroway, Schiffrin & Barroway and others. This led to the
Commissioner of Patents suspending certain of the Iviewit patent applications
into an infinite black hole. The form also included inventor change forms which
have gone wholly unresolved while patents are in black hole at the United States
Patent & Trademark Office. 2004 03 03 Crossbow Ventures CEO Stephen J. Warner
signs statement to patent office that fraud was committed by the attorneys
against Iviewit and Crossbow Ventures and where 2/3 of the Crossbow Venture
funds were Small Business Administration SBIC loans, this makes this fraud
against the SBA and the USPTO. Oy Vey. 2004 03 04 - 09 522 721 Filing with the
United States Patent & Trademark Office claiming that per the direction of Harry
I. Moatz, Director of the Office of Enrollment & Discipline, Iviewit & Crossbow
Ventures were seeking the Commissioner of Patents to suspend the Iviewit patents
based on evidence of Fraud on the United States Patent & Trademark Office by
Iviewit former Intellectual Property attorneys, Kenneth Rubenstein, Proskauer
Rose LLP, Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolf & Schlissel, Raymond Anthony Joao, Foley
& Lardner, William J. Dick, Douglas Boehm, Steven Becker, Blakely Sokoloff
Taylor & Zafman, Thomas Coester, Norman Zafman, Farzahd Ahmini, Christopher &
Weisberg PA, Krishna Narine, Andrew Barroway, Schiffrin & Barroway and others.
This led to the Commissioner of Patents suspending certain of the Iviewit patent
applications into an infinite black hole. The form also included inventor change
forms which have gone wholly unresolved while patents are in black hole at the
United States Patent & Trademark Office. 2004 03 04 - 09 587 026 Filing with the
United States Patent & Trademark Office claiming that per the direction of Harry
I. Moatz, Director of the Office of Enrollment & Discipline, Iviewit & Crossbow
Ventures were seeking the Commissioner of Patents to suspend the Iviewit patents
based on evidence of Fraud on the United States Patent & Trademark Office by
Iviewit former Intellectual Property attorneys, Kenneth Rubenstein, Proskauer
Rose LLP, Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolf & Schlissel, Raymond Anthony Joao, Foley
& Lardner, William J. Dick, Douglas Boehm, Steven Becker, Blakely Sokoloff
Taylor & Zafman, Thomas Coester, Norman Zafman, Farzahd Ahmini, Christopher &
Weisberg PA, Krishna Narine, Andrew Barroway, Schiffrin & Barroway and others.
This led to the Commissioner of Patents suspending certain of the Iviewit patent
applications into an infinite black hole. The form also included inventor change
forms which have gone wholly unresolved while patents are in black hole at the
United States Patent & Trademark Office. 2004 03 04 - 09 630 939 - 2004 03 04
United States Patent & Trademark Commissioner approval of request for suspension
while investigations are pending into Iviewit claims that their attorneys
committed both fraud on the USPTO and fraud on Iviewit. Patents remain in limbo.
2004 03 05 Eric Montel Turner of The Florida Bar letter stating he had turned
the review over to the chair, notice his failure to capitalize the undefined
term chair, as if his chair was reviewing the matters, this becomes hysterical
in next letters. 2004 03 12 Iviewit response to Virginia Bar decision regarding
William J. Dick and Foley & Lardner showing that the patents were suspended
based on charges that Dick was involved in fraud on the United States Patent &
Trademark Office and fraud on Iviewit and to reopen his case in light of this
new and damaging evidence. Also, the IP docket submitted by Dick in his response
to the Virginia Bar was found by the USPTO to be fraught with fraud. Yet,
Virginia Bar held fast on their decisions despite compelling evidence to
investigate. 2004 03 16 - AICPA letter regarding the complaint against Gerald
Lewin, Goldstein & Lewin Co. and Erika Lewin seeking more information. This
investigation is then derailed by a new investigator who claims the AICPA does
not have funds to investigate and that we should go to the Florida Department of
Business and Professional Regulation, where Lewin slips out of that complaint,
again appearing a total denial of due process. 2004 03 17 Iviewit letter to
Special Agent Stephen Lucchesi of the Federal Bureau of Investigation in West
Palm Beach Florida requesting investigation of the Iviewit matters. Filing with
the United States Patent & Trademark Office claiming that per the direction of
Harry I. Moatz, Director of the Office of Enrollment & Discipline, Iviewit &
Crossbow Ventures were seeking the Commissioner of Patents to suspend the
Iviewit patents based on evidence of Fraud on the United States Patent &
Trademark Office by Iviewit former Intellectual Property attorneys, Kenneth
Rubenstein, Proskauer Rose LLP, Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolf & Schlissel,
Raymond Anthony Joao, Foley & Lardner, William J. Dick, Douglas Boehm, Steven
Becker, Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman, Thomas Coester, Norman Zafman, Farzahd
Ahmini, Christopher & Weisberg PA, Krishna Narine, Andrew Barroway, Schiffrin &
Barroway and others. This led to the Commissioner of Patents suspending certain
of the Iviewit patent applications into an infinite black hole. The form also
included inventor change forms which have gone wholly unresolved while patents
are in black hole at the United States Patent & Trademark Office.' 2004 03 22
Portfolio Compilation Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolf & Schlissel, Foley & Lardner
& Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman which shows inconsistencies between the firms
on the patent owners, inventors and assignees. 2004 03 22 William J. Dick
Virginia Bar Iviewit rebuttal 2,881 pages of great evidence for the IP crimes.
2004 03 23 Letter to Shareholders showing Iviewit is being billed for Utley
patents, the billings appear to be fraudulent and to attempt to justify the
Utley patents once they were discovered, nice try at a cover up. 2004 03 23
United States Patent & Trademark Office correspondence showing that the Utley
patents are not the property of Iviewit, the inventors are not the Iviewit
inventors and the owners and assignees are not the Iviewit Companies. 2004 03 23
United States Patent & Trademark Office correspondence showing that the Utley
patents are not the property of Iviewit, the inventors are not the Iviewit
inventors and the owners and assignees are not the Iviewit Companies. 2004 03 23
United States Patent & Trademark Office correspondence showing that the Utley
patents are not the property of Iviewit, the inventors are not the Iviewit
inventors and the owners and assignees are not the Iviewit Companies. 2004 03 25
Patent Portfolio prepared by Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman and reviewed by
Weider of the United States Patent & Trademark Office whereby it was found there
appeared a mass of fraud and this led to Commissioner of Patents suspending the
IP. 2004 03 25 Patent Portfolio prepared by Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman and
reviewed by Weider of the United States Patent & Trademark Office whereby it was
found there appeared a mass of fraud and this led to Commissioner of Patents
suspending the IP. 2004 03 26 Moatz letter to take time responding for
complaint. 2004 03 29 United States Patent & Trademark Office Commissioner
suspends Iviewit patents based on allegations of fraud on the USPTO and Iviewit.
2004 03 29 United States Patent & Trademark Office Commissioner suspends Iviewit
patents based on allegations of fraud on the USPTO and Iviewit. 2004 03 29
Withdrawal of attorneys Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman and Foley & Lardner.
2004 03 30 Corporate formation chart based on evidence recovered from Iviewit
files and files from Proskauer Rose copied in Proskauer v. Iviewit case, showing
a litany of corporations and name changes. This excersize was preformed after
learning from the United States Patent & Trademark Office - Harry I. Moatz, that
patents had been assigned to companies they should not have been assigned too.
2004 04 03 - 09 587 730 - 2004 04 03 United States Patent & Trademark Office
approval of Request for Suspension of the patent based on allegations of fraud
on the United States Patent & Trademark Office by Iviewit patent attorneys. This
letter was also sent to the accused to notify them of the liability and for them
to report such to their liability carriers. 2004 04 19 - 09 587 026 - 57103-115
2004 04 19 United States Patent & Trademark Office approval of Request for
Suspension of the patent based on allegations of fraud on the United States
Patent & Trademark Office by Iviewit patent attorneys. 2004 04 21 Letter to
Iviewit Shareholders and Directors regarding the fraud uncovered at the United
States Patent & Trademark Office and the corporate fraud discovered. 2004 04 21
Letter to Iviewit Shareholders and Directors regarding the fraud uncovered at
the United States Patent & Trademark Office and the corporate fraud discovered.
2004 04 29 Chart prepared to explain as best as possible on the limited evidence
at the time how the patent and corporate scheme was presumed to have occurred.
2004 04 30 Director and Officers Meeting Agenda. 2004 04 30 Director and
Officers Meeting Agenda. 2004 04 30 Response to AICPA request for more
information regarding complaints against Gerald R. Lewin, Erika Lewin and
Goldstein Lewin & Co. CPA's 2004 04 30 Response to AICPA request for more
information regarding complaints against Gerald R. Lewin, Erika Lewin and
Goldstein Lewin & Co. CPA's 2004 04 30 Teleconference Minutes from Directors and
Officers meeting regarding the fraud discovered. 2004 04 21 Letter to Iviewit
Shareholders and Directors regarding the fraud uncovered at the United States
Patent & Trademark Office and the corporate fraud discovered. 2004 05 01 Iviewit
letters to former Officers and Directors regarding the information uncovered at
the United States Patent & Trademark Office and regarding the corporate fraud
and other crimes. This question set was for Gerald Lewin of Goldstein & Lewin
Co. 2004 05 02 Minutes of meeting with former Board and Officers. 2004 05 02
Teleconference Minutes of Board meeting. 2004 05 13 Iviewit letters to former
Officers and Directors regarding the information uncovered at the United States
Patent & Trademark Office and regarding the corporate fraud and other crimes.
This question set was for Christopher Clark Wheeler of Proskauer Rose LLP. 2004
05 19 Complaint filed against Steven C. Krane and Proskauer Rose LLP at the
Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department Departmental
Disciplinary Committee to strike the conflicted response of Krane who violated
his public office positions in representing his firm and partner Kenneth
Rubenstein in their bar complaints. 2004 05 19 Complaint filed against Steven C.
Krane and Proskauer Rose LLP at the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division
First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee with Thomas Cahill to
strike the conflicted response of Krane who violated his public office positions
in representing his firm and partner Kenneth Rubenstein in their bar complaints.
2004 05 19 Iviewit letter to the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division
First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee to strike the conflicted
response of Steven C. Krane of Proskauer in the Kenneth Rubenstein and Proskauer
Rose LLP complaint filed and a formal request for investigation of Krane for
such violations of his public offices. 2004 05 20 Iviewit letter to the Supreme
Court of New York Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary
Committee to strike the conflicted response of Steven C. Krane of Proskauer in
the Kenneth Rubenstein and Proskauer Rose LLP complaint filed and a formal
request for investigation of Krane for such violations of his public offices.
2004 05 21 Eric Montel Turner of the Florida Bar's response to the Iviewit
petition to the Florida Supreme Court, note the illiteracy rate in the response
that makes it impossible to determine what exactly he is saying. 2004 05 21 Eric
Montel Turner of the Florida Bar's response to the Iviewit petition to the
Florida Supreme Court, note the illiteracy rate in the response that makes it
impossible to determine what exactly he is saying. 2004 05 21 Steven C. Krane of
Proskauer Rose response to the complaint filed against him and requesting that
his responses be stricken from the Rubenstein complaint. Krane fails to disclose
his roles at both the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First
Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee and The New York State Bar which
both preclude him from handling complaints against his firm and partner,
especially where he has personal and professional interests. The infamous Krane
suicide note. 2004 05 21 Iviewit letters to former Officers and Directors
regarding the information uncovered at the United States Patent & Trademark
Office and regarding the corporate fraud and other crimes. This question set was
for Kenneth Rubenstein of Proskauer Rose LLP and MPEGLA LLC. 2004 05 24 Eric
Turner of The Florida Bar letter telling Iviewit to put everything in writing to
avoid misunderstandings. 2004 05 24 Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division
First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee letter to strike the
responses of Steven C. Krane of Proskaeur Rose for conflicts of interest and
violations of public offices. 2004 05 25 Supreme Court of New York Appellate
Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee letter to strike
the responses of Steven C. Krane of Proskaeur Rose for conflicts of interest and
violations of public officesSupreme Court Strike Response of Steven Krane for
Conflict of Interest & Violation of Public Offices. 2004 05 26 - Iviewit
response to Steven C. Krane letter dated May 21, 2004 asking the Supreme Court
of New York Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary
Committee's, Chief Counsel, Thomas Cahill to strike all Krane responses and
pointing out his roles at the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First
Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee and NYSBA and other ethics
departments that all made his representations violations of his public offices.
2004 05 26 Biography of Steven C. Krane showing conflicting roles at Supreme
Court of New York Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary
Committee, the NYSBA and other ethics departments that would have precluded him
from representing his Proskauer partner Rubenstein, his firm Proskauer and
himself. 2004 05 26 - Iviewit response to Steven C. Krane letter dated May 21,
2004 asking the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department
Departmental Disciplinary Committee's, Chief Counsel, Thomas Cahill to strike
all Krane responses and pointing out his roles at the Supreme Court of New York
Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee and
NYSBA and other ethics departments that all made his representations violations
of his public offices. 2004 05 26 Iviewit letter to Foley & Lardner 2004 05 27 -
Eric Turner Response to letter dated 2004 05 21 2004 05 27 - Iviewit Letter to
Eric Turner of The Florida Bar letter dated May 21, 2004. 2004 06 01 - Eric
Turner of The Florida Bar regarding the process for elevating the Christopher
Clark Wheeler Florida Bar complaint. This comes after Turner tried to claim he
was the final arbiter for The Florida Bar. 2004 06 01 - Eric Turner of The
Florida Bar regarding the process for elevating the Christopher Clark Wheeler
Florida Bar complaint. This comes after Turner tried to claim he was the final
arbiter for The Florida Bar. 2004 06 02 - Iviewit letter to Eric Turner of The
Florida Bar. 2004 06 06 The Florida Bar taped call regarding confirming that
Matthew Triggs of Proskauer had a role with a Florida Bar Grievance Committee
within the year which precluded him from representing any party for a period of
one year, especially his partner and his law firm, especially where he had
personal and professional interests in the outcome and finally where he was
representing Proskauer simultaneously in the Proskauer v. Iviewit lawsuit. 2004
06 14 Japanese Office Action. 2004 06 17 Supreme Court of New York Appellate
Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee's, Chief Counsel,
Thomas Cahill's Motion to move the complaints of Steven C. Krane, Proskauer and
Kenneth Rubenstein for what he claims to avoid the appearance of impropriety
when in fact he knew that Krane had violated his public office. Iviewit had
contacted Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe of the Supreme Court of New York Appellate
Division First Department who informed Iviewit that despite Cahill's initial
denial that Krane had any roles with the department, that she was having a
meeting with both Cahill and Krane on a Committee at the department. Holy cow
Batman, their busted. Cahill writes this biased letter after learning that a
complaint was filed against him and it is wholly misleading of the facts. 2004
06 23 - Paul J. Curran, Chairman of the Supreme Court of New York Appellate
Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee moving the
complaint filed against Thomas J. Cahill for investigation according to
department rules. A complaint was filed against Thomas J. Cahill for his
involvement with lying about Steven C. Krane's conflicts and violations of
public offices. 2004 06 23 Iviewit faxs the disciplinary complaint filed against
Thomas J. Cahill to Paul J. Curran for investigation. 2004 06 23 Cahill
Petition. 2004 06 24 Iviewit letter to Eric Turner of the Florida Bar demanding
information regarding the positions of Matthew Triggs, Christopher Clark Wheeler
and Spencer Sax of Sax Sachs & Klien to determine further violations of public
offices revealed by the Triggs violation of public offices and noticing him that
Iviewit would be petitioning the Florida Supreme Court. 2004 06 29 - Complaint
against Steven C. Krane of Proskauer Rose sent to Paul J. Curran, Chairman of
the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department Departmental
Disciplinary Committee. 2004 06 30 The Florida Bar complaint against Eric Montel
Turner for his violations of his Florida Bar public office position. 2004 06 30
The Florida Bar's President, Kelly Overstreet Johnson, accepting Iviewit
complaint letters but fails to disclose her conflicts. Johnson was conflicted
with the Wheeler complaint as she worked at the Florida law firm of Broad &
Cassel with Wheeler's brother, James Wheeler and failed to disclose such while
taking complaint information in. 2004 06 30 Christopher Clark Wheeler biography
showing his false claims of Florida Bar positions, which is a violation of
attorney conduct rules of Florida, this forms the base for yet another complaint
against Wheeler for false advertising. 2004 07 01 Debroah Yarbrough, a clerk for
the Florida Supreme Court fax cover telling her the Florida Bar intended on
destroying files and hiding the case so it could not be sent to the Florida
Supreme Court. 2004 07 01 Eric Turner Complaint Against Eric Turner The Florida
Bar 2004 07 01 Eric M. Turner formal Florida Bar complaint, sent to Turner. 2004
07 01 Florida Supreme Court Case SC04-1078 - Acknowledgement of New Case and
Stricken Due to Petitioner Not A Member of The Florida Bar Representing A
Corporation. 2004 07 01 Iviewit fax of a Petition for the Florida Supreme Court
regarding the Florida Bar crimes being committed by its members. 2004 07 01
Letter to Debbie Yarbrough of the Florida Supreme Court regarding the Florida
Bar's half truth on the file destruction of the Christopher Clark Wheeler bar
complaint. 2004 07 01 Debroah Yarbrough of the Florida Supreme Court's message
regarding Kenneth Marvin of The Florida Bar's misleading Yarbrough, stating The
Florida Bar would return the files to Iviewit. Marvin fails to state that The
Florida Bar would destroy their work product that was necessary to evaluate the
confirmed violation of public office by Matthew Triggs for prosecution. 2004 07
02 Kenneth Marvin of The Florida Bar letter regarding the Eric Montel Turner
Florida Bar complaint, stating that the Turner violations of his public office
were employer/employee matters and that he would not docket or process the
formal filed complaint. This is inapposite of Florida Constitution and The Rules
Regulating the Florida Bar. 2004 07 06 Iviewit Petition to the Florida Supreme
Court regarding the Christopher C. Wheeler bar complaint, the Matthew Triggs
complaint and the Eric M. Turner complaint. FINAL NOTARIZED 2004 07 08 Iviewit
Motion to the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department
regarding the Cahill complaint. 2004 07 08 Iviewit Motion to the New York
Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department regarding the conflicts and
violations of public offices of Kenneth Rubenstein, Proskauer Rose, Steven C.
Krane, Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolf & Schlissel and Raymond A. Joao and
requesting immediate investigation and to move the complaints. 2004 07 09 The
Florida Bar's counsel John Anthony Boggs letter confirming the violation of
public office by Matthew Triggs of Proskauer in the handling of his Proskauer
Partner Wheeler and his firm Proskauer. Boggs then tries to cite law that was
only proposed as a defense of Wheeler and states shoulda coulda woulda logic in
attempts to justify the violation. Funny that the Florida Bar is acting like
Wheeler's personal defense. 2004 07 09 The Florida Bar's counsel John Anthony
Boggs letter confirming the violation of public office by Matthew Triggs of
Proskauer in the handling of his Proskauer Partner Wheeler and his firm
Proskauer. Boggs then tries to cite law that was only proposed as a defense of
Wheeler and states shoulda coulda woulda logic in attempts to justify the
violation. Funny that the Florida Bar is acting like Wheeler's personal defense.
2004 07 12 Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department
Departmental Disciplinary Committee's, Chief Counsel, Thomas Cahill's Motion to
move the complaints of Steven C. Krane and Proskauer, note this comes after
Cahill has a filed complaint against him, making this further reason for another
complaint against him. 2004 07 12 Florida Supreme Court Iviewit docket update.
2004 07 13 Iviewit's second bar complaint against Christopher Clark Wheeler of
Proskauer Rose, this goes undocketed and never gets resolved, inapposite The
Rules Regulating The Florida Bar and against the Florida Constitution. 2004 07
15 - American Internation Group "AIG" Directors and Officers policy internal
affairs letter regarding fraud on AIG committed by Proskauer Rose. 2004 07 15 -
American Internation Group "AIG" Directors and Officers policy internal affairs
letter regarding fraud on AIG committed by Proskauer Rose. 2004 07 22 John A.
Boggs of The Florida Bar receipt of Matthew Triggs bar complaint which was never
formally docketed or given procedural due process, inapposite The Rules
Regulating The Florida Bar and the Florida Constitution. 2004 07 22 Kelly O.
Johnson, President, The Florida Bar, receipt of the Matthew Triggs of
Proskauer's bar complaint. Johnson recieves complaint information on Wheeler
failing to disclose she works for Wheeler's brother James Wheeler at Broad &
Cassel, a small law firm in Florida. 2004 07 22 Matthew Triggs bar complaint at
The Florida Bar. The complaint was never docketed or procedurally disposed of,
inapposite The Rules Regulating The Florida Bar and the Florida Constitution.
2004 07 22 Matthew Triggs bar complaint at The Florida Bar. The complaint was
never docketed or procedurally disposed of, inapposite The Rules Regulating The
Florida Bar and the Florida Constitution. BOOKMARKED 2004 07 23 Florida Supreme
Court ruling that Iviewit cannot be represented Pro Se, forcing the complaint to
be re-filed by Lamont and Bernstein on behalf of the Iviewit Shareholders.
Although Florida pulled this trick, the New York Supreme Court did not and
allowed Iviewit to be represented by Lamont and Bernstein acting Pro Se. 2004 07
23 - The Affirmed Amended Petition for: Injunctive Relief; Declaratory Relief;
Begin Immediate Investigation of Complaint Against Christopher C. Wheeler; and
Move Complaints to the Next Highest Level of Review, Void of Conflict of
Interest and Appearance Of Impropriety declined based on Pro Se representation
of a corporation. 2004 07 26 Iviewit letter to Harry I. Moatz of the United
States Patent & Trademark Office regarding failure of patent agents Moatz
assigned to return calls regarding upcoming patent suspension deadlines and
asking that he request another twelve months of suspension. 2004 07 28 Iviewit
response to letter of John A. Boggs of The Florida Bar regarding the complaints
of Christopher C. Wheeler of Proskauer, Matthew Triggs of Proskauer and Eric
Montel Turner of The Florida Bar and his attempts to obfuscate his duties and
other matters of interest. 2004 07 28 Cahill to move Krane. 2004 07 28 Crossbow
Ventures signs alongside Iviewit inventors with the United States Patent &
Trademark Office charges of Fraud on the Patent Office and requests to change
inventors to the Iviewit inventors. 2004 07 28 Iviewit Amended Petition to the
Florida Supreme Court Docket #SC04-1078 regarding the crimes committed at The
Florida Bar. 2004 07 28 Iviewit Amended Petition to the Florida Supreme Court
Docket #SC04-1078 regarding the crimes committed at The Florida Bar. 2004 07 28
Iviewit Amended Petition to the Florida Supreme Court Docket #SC04-1078
regarding the crimes committed at The Florida Bar. 2004 07 28 Iviewit response
to John Anthony Boggs of The Florida Bar's letter confirming Matthew Triggs of
Proskauer violation of The Rules Regulating The Florida Bar, a violation of his
Supreme Court public office position. To note Kelly Overstreet Johnson was
copied on this and accepts the document while failing to disclose that she has a
major conflict in that she works directly for Christopher Wheeler's brother,
James Wheeler at a small Florida law firm Broad & Cassel. 2004 07 28 Iviewit
request to the Commissioner of Patents to suspend ALL patents and trademarks of
Iviewit's for 12 more months. 2004 07 29 - Supreme Court of Florida Ruling that
the style of the Florida Supreme Court case has been changed from Iviewit
Holdings, Inc. v. The Florida Bar to Eliot Bernstein, et. al versus The Florida
Bar 2004 07 29 Florida Supreme Court Case #SCO4-1078 Ruling that The Florida Bar
must halt the planned destruction of the Iviewit bar complaints against
Christopher Clark Wheeler of Proskauer. Although they halted this, when they
decided to abandon the case, the only Order they gave was in favor of The
Florida Bar to destroy the evidence, inapposite Florida record retention laws.
2004 07 29 Florida Supreme Court Case #SCO4-1078 Ruling that The Florida Bar
must halt the planned destruction of the Iviewit bar complaints against
Christopher Clark Wheeler of Proskauer. Although they halted this, when they
decided to abandon the case, the only Order they gave was in favor of The
Florida Bar to destroy the evidence, inapposite Florida record retention laws.
2004 07 29 Debroah Yarborough, clerk of the Florida Supreme Court message
regarding the ruling that The Florida Bar halt destruction of the Iviewit bar
complaints at The Florida Bar message. 2004 08 03 The Florida Bar counsel Eric
M. Turner letter trying to explain why the Matthew Triggs complaint for
violations of his public office position with The Florida Bar is not being
docketed due to its being faxed. The complaint was then mailed but still The
Florida Bar never docketed the case. It is remarkable that with a complaint
lodged against him in the matters, Turner was allowed to continue acting in the
matters. 2004 08 09 Japanese Patent Office investigation letter. Very
interesting in that the JPO tries to claim that there is no such thing as fraud
in Japan??? 2004 08 11 Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First
Department Orders the complaints against Kenneth Rubenstein, Proskauer, Raymond
Joao, Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolf & Schlissel and Steven C. Krane to be moved
for immediate investigation due to the appearance of impropriety and conflicts.
The case was then transferred to the Supreme Court of New York Appellate
Division Second Department where further conflicts with Krane were discovered
that derailed the investigation and caused a flurry of further complaints
against the Second Department members. 2004 08 11 Supreme Court of New York
Appellate Division First Department Orders the complaints against Kenneth
Rubenstein, Proskauer, Raymond Joao, Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolf & Schlissel
and Steven C. Krane to be moved for immediate investigation due to the
appearance of impropriety and conflicts. The case was then transferred to the
Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division Second Department where further
conflicts with Krane were discovered that derailed the investigation and caused
a flurry of further complaints against the Second Department members. 2004 08 19
Iviewit letter to Andrew H. Goodman of the Virginia Bar regarding the William J.
Dick bar complaint and noticing the Virginia Bar of conflicts and violations of
public offices found in new York and Florida regarding those investigations.
Information from the Florida Bar and the Supreme Court of New York Appellate
Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee was used in Dick's
defense of the bar complaint. This should have caused at minimum review of the
Dick matters. 2004 08 23 Iviewit letter to the FBI Special Agent Stephen
Lucchesi regarding his taking the matters to the US Attorney. 2004 08 25 Iviewit
letter to Andrew H. Goodman of the Virginia Bar regarding the William J. Dick
bar complaint and noticing the Virginia Bar of conflicts and violations of
public offices found in new York and Florida regarding those investigations.
Information from the Florida Bar and the Supreme Court of New York Appellate
Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee was used in Dick's
defense of the bar complaint. This should have caused at minimum review of the
Dick matters. 2004 08 27 Patent Office correspondence. 2004 09 07 Supreme Court
of New York Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary
Committee's, Chief Counsel, Thomas Cahill's cover letter transferring the
complaints of Steven C. Krane, Proskauer, Kenneth Rubenstein, Raymond Joao &
Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolf & Schlissel due to the unanimous decision by five
justices of the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department.
Very interesting that Cahill handles this as he is part of an ongoing
investigation for his part in the crimes at the court and thus acts in conflict
and violation of his public office. What is damning is that Cahill tries to
impart to the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division Second Department
that they are do as they please with the cases, which is not what the justices
ordered, they ordered IMMEDIATE INVESTIGATION, yet Cahill tries to help himself
and his buddies out of the mess again. 2004 09 08 NEWS ARTICLE - Sony release a
zoom TV. 2004 09 09 Steven C. Krane of Proskauer Rose, after being implicated
for conflicts and violations of his Supreme Court and other public office
positions violations starts working on a new biography of himself cutting what
is implicating from his past as if it would disappear from his cover up. This is
as funny as the picture of Krane at the Proskauer website where he replaces the
picture where he weighs about 500 pounds with one from years earlier before he
engorged himself in greed. You can run but you cannot hide Mr. Unethical. "2004
09 11 Iviewit files with LAWYERS FUND FOR CLIENT PROTECTION OF THE STATE OF NEW
YORK." 2004 09 07 Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department
Departmental Disciplinary Committee's, Chief Counsel, Thomas Cahill's cover
letter transferring the complaints of Steven C. Krane, Proskauer, Kenneth
Rubenstein, Raymond Joao & Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolf & Schlissel due to the
unanimous decision by five justices of the Supreme Court of New York Appellate
Division First Department. Very interesting that Cahill handles this as he is
part of an ongoing investigation for his part in the crimes at the court and
thus acts in conflict and violation of his public office. What is damning is
that Cahill tries to impart to the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division
Second Department that they are do as they please with the cases, which is not
what the justices ordered, they ordered IMMEDIATE INVESTIGATION, yet Cahill
tries to help himself and his buddies out of the mess again. 2004 09 21 Iviewit
letter to Andrew Goodman of the Virginia Bar regarding William Dick of Foley &
Lardner bar complaint, noticing the VA bar of the violations of public offices
found in New York and Florida in the related attorney complaints of Christopher
Clark Wheeler, Kenneth Rubenstein, Raymond Joao, Steven C. Krane and Matthew
Triggs. 2004 09 22 United States Patent & Trademark Office second six month
Suspension Notice. Note that the USPTO claims they are being suspended pending
investigation into the inventor and other issues presented. The patents remain
in limbo. 2004 10 05 Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division Second
Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee's, Chief Counsel, Diana Maxfield
Kearse trying to get Steven C. Krane, Proskauer, Kenneth Rubenstein and Raymond
Joao out of the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department
Court ORDER for immediate investigation by claiming she reviewed and found no
evidence of misconduct. This decision despite that she was ordered to
investigate by five justice who reviewed the materials and found reason to Order
investigations. No of the accused had to put a defense up, no witnesses were
contacted, no evidence tested and then Kearse admits that she is conflicted with
Krane but refuses to answer questions regarding her conflict and tells Iviewit
to put any request for that information in writing. Kearse is charged with a
complaint for her undisclosed conflicts after she fails to respond to the
written request for disclosure of her conflicts with both Krane and Judge Judith
Kaye. 2004 10 07 Iviewit Petition to the Florida Supreme Court requesting
intervention in the Boca Raton Police Department investigation and the FBI
investigation as they tried to set up a fake meeting with members of the SEC and
this caused grave concerns that it was to intimidate inventor Bernstein to drop
his charges against the Boca PD regarding their failure to investigate and
possible internal corruptions. 2004 10 08 Taped Florida Bar message confirming
Matthew Triggs of Proskauer's dates of service with The Florida Bar. This
confirms that Triggs acted in violation of his public office when he represented
Christopher C. Wheeler in his Florida Bar complaint. 2004 10 08 Florida Supreme
Court SC104 1078 Iviewit Petition to the Florida Supreme Court requesting
intervention in the Boca Raton Police Department investigation and the FBI
investigation as they tried to set up a fake meeting with members of the SEC and
this caused grave concerns that it was to intimidate inventor Bernstein to drop
his charges against the Boca PD regarding their failure to investigate and
possible internal corruptions. 2004 10 08 Taped Florida Bar message confirming
Matthew Triggs of Proskauer's dates of service with The Florida Bar. This
confirms that Triggs acted in violation of his public office when he represented
Christopher C. Wheeler in his Florida Bar complaint. 2004 10 10 Letter from
David White of the European Patent Office regarding starting investigations with
the legal department. 2004 10 11 Florida Supreme Court Ruling in Case #SCO4-1078
that the Florida Bar is to respond to the Iviewit Petition. This despite Eric
Montel Turner's prior claims that the Florida Supreme Court would not be able to
review the matters as The Florida Bar was the final arbiter. 2004 10 13 -
Iviewit Florida Supreme Court case docket #SC104-1078 Update Docket cert 2004 10
13 AIG D&O letter, stating they are investigating the matters. 2004 10 15
Florida Supreme Court Denial of Motion for protective custody and to over sight
investigations at the FBI and Boca Raton PD for failure to invoke courts
jurisdiction. 2004 10 15 Florida Supreme Court Denial of Motion for Declaratory
Relief; Intervene in Third Party Investigations of the Boca Raton Police
Department, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the Securities and Exchange
Commission with the Courts oversight to ensure due process and an emergency
order for the Immediate Protective Custody of Eliot I. Bernstein, Candice M.
Bernstein, Joshua EZ Bernstein, Jacob NA Bernstein, Daniel EAO Bernstein, P.
Stephen Lamont & P. Stephen Lamont II - Failure to Invoke Court Jurisdiction
2004 10 15 United States Patent & Trademark Office correspondence regarding
suspensions. 2004 10 18 Iviewit letter to Martin Gold and Paul Curran to move
the complaint of Thomas J. Cahill from the Supreme Court of New York Appellate
Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee to a non
conflicted third party, based on the Court Order for investigation of Kenneth
Rubenstein, Proskauer Rose, Steven C. Krane and Raymond Joao due to conflicts
and the appearance of impropriety. 2004 10 18 Kelly Overstreet Johnson,
President of The Florida Bar read receipt on Service of the Florida Supreme
Court petition. Johnson fails to disclose at this time or previously that she
has conflict with Christopher C. Wheeler's brother, James Wheeler of Broad &
Cassel, as she works for him at the law firm. 2004 10 20 AIG POLICY 872-99-99
showing Brian G. Utley committed fraud on the application and that the policy is
issued on a non-existent company. 2004 10 20 AIG POLICY 872-99-99 showing Brian
G. Utley committed fraud on the application and that the policy is issued on a
non-existent company. 2004 10 22 Eric Turner of The Florida Bar response to the
Iviewit Petition filed with the Florida Supreme Court. There are no comments on
this document but try to pick out the numerous grammatical errors for fun. The
response addresses none of the issues in the filed Petition and thus Iviewit
moves for a default judgement. 2004 10 22 Eric Turner of The Florida Bar
response to the Iviewit Petition filed with the Florida Supreme Court. There are
comments on this document showing the illiteracy of the response. The response
addresses none of the issues in the filed Petition and thus Iviewit moves for a
default judgement. 2004 10 22 Florida Bar to Supreme Court eib comments 2004 10
25 Petition Response 09 522 721.zip 2004 10 26 Iviewit letter response to
Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division Second Department Departmental
Disciplinary Committee's, Chief Counsel, Diana Maxfield Kearse, rebutting her
decision in spite of the Court Order for investigation, to dismiss the
complaints against Kenneth Rubenstein, Proskauer Rose, Steven C. Krane, Meltzer
Lippe Goldstein Wolf & Schlissel and Raymond Joao on review, not investigation.
The letter also asks Kearse to disclose the conflicts she had with Krane and
Judge Judith Kaye in writing as she requested. 2004 10 26 Iviewit letter
response to Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division Second Department
Departmental Disciplinary Committee's, Chief Counsel, Diana Maxfield Kearse,
rebutting her decision in spite of the Court Order for investigation, to dismiss
the complaints against Kenneth Rubenstein, Proskauer Rose, Steven C. Krane,
Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolf & Schlissel and Raymond Joao on review, not
investigation. The letter also asks Kearse to disclose the conflicts she had
with Krane and Judge Judith Kaye in writing as she requested. 2004 10 26 St Paul
Insurance Company investigation letter written by law firm Garcia & Stallone
regarding Raymond A. Joao fraud issues. 2004 11 04 Florida Department of
Professional Regulation letter requesting more information regarding the
complaints filed against Gerald Lewin, Erika Lewin and Goldstein Lewin & Co.
CPA's. Iviewit was forced to take complaints here as the AICPA suddenly in the
middle of investigation terminated their investigation stating they had no money
and told Iviewit to take the complaints to the DPR who later dismissed the
complaints, wonder how much this cost. 2004 11 04 Iviewit filed with Florida
Supreme Court a Motion to Extend Response SC04-1078. 2004 11 09 - Supreme Court
of New York Appellate Division Second Department Departmental Disciplinary
Committee's, Chief Counsel, Diana Maxfield Kearse, stating that a committee
member would review if the complaints ordered for investigation by the Supreme
Court of New York Appellate Division First Department justices would be reopened
for investigation, note no investigation was ever done but later as they get
deeper in their bs, they try to state that the review was an investigation and
thus they complied with the First Department order. 2004 11 10 - Florida Supreme
Court - Grant Extension of Time 2004 11 11 Florida Supreme Court Case #SC04-1078
Iviewit response to The Florida Bar response to the Iviewit Petition filed. 2004
11 15 Florida Supreme Court Case #SC04-1078 Iviewit response to The Florida Bar
response to the Iviewit Petition filed. 2004 11 15 Florida Supreme Court Case
#SC04-1078 Iviewit response to The Florida Bar response to the Iviewit Petition
filed. 2004 11 15 Florida Supreme Court Case #SC04-1078 Iviewit response to The
Florida Bar response to the Iviewit Petition filed. CERT 2004 11 22 Iviewit
letter response to Garcia and Stallone in regard to the fraud exposed with their
client Raymond A. Joao whose is covered by St. Paul Insurance. Letter notifies
them that Joao was ordered for investigation by the First Department which he
failed to disclose to St. Paul. 2004 11 25 European Patent Office letter
response to letters exposing them to fraud on the USPTO and Iviewit. 2004 11 30
08-59 THE STATE OF NEW YORK COURT OF APPEALS PSL G. 2004 12 15 Delray Beach
Florida Drunk Driving Arrest Report for Felony DUI with injury against
Christopher Clark Wheeler of Proskauer Rose. You gotta read what his wife says,
go Deanna!!! 2004 12 15 Delray Beach Florida Drunk Driving Arrest Report for
Felony DUI with injury against Christopher Clark Wheeler of Proskauer Rose. You
gotta read what his wife says, go Deanna!!! 2004 12 20 Supreme Court of New York
Appellate Division Second Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee's,
Chairman, Lawrence DiGiovanna's review of Kearse decision and siding with her
decision to not investigate and dismiss based on review, despite the Supreme
Court of New York Appellate Division First Department court Order to
investigate, not review. For his part in obfuscating justice a complaint is
filed against both Kearse and DiGiovanna which both go undocketed and
procedurally are derailed by Kearse who even handles the complaint against
herself??? 2004 12 22 United States Patent & Trademark Office letter to James
Groody regarding the patent suspensions. 2004 12 24 Stephen Kaye of Proskauer
Rose biography, yes this is the husband of Judge Judith Kaye, whose former law
clerk was Steven Krane, partner with Stephen Kaye at Proskauer in the
Intellectual Property group that was formed immediately after Proskauer took
disclosures of the Iviewit inventions, then ran out and hired Rubenstein with
his MPEGLA pools to steal the Iviewit inventions. Here we finally see how the
denial of due process in New York was being effectuated and how the crimes were
going uninvestigated and were derailed. 2004 12 24 Steven C. Krane of Proskauer
Rose, after being implicated for conflicts and violations of his Supreme Court
and other public office positions violations starts working on a new biography
of himself cutting what is implicating from his past as if it would disappear
from his cover up. This is as funny as the picture of Krane at the Proskauer
website where he replaces the picture where he weighs about 500 pounds with one
from years earlier before he engorged himself in greed. You can run but you
cannot hide Mr. Unethical. 2005 01 10 Iviewit letter response to 2004 12 20
Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division Second Department Departmental
Disciplinary Committee's, Chairman, Lawrence DiGiovanna's review of Kearse
decision to not investigate inapposite of the Supreme Court of New York
Appellate Division First Department order to investigate and other issues
regarding conflicts with Steven C. Krane and Chief Judge Judith Kaye. 2005 01 12
- Florida Supreme Court Petition For All Writs Jurisdiction filed by Iviewit is
denied and allows the Florida Bar to destroy the Iviewit complaint against
Christopher Clark Wheeler to be destroyed. After receiving a non response to the
Petition filed by The Florida Bar, that wholly failed to respond to the
substantive issues of the Petition the Florida Supreme Court ordered them to
respond to. The case is thrown so that the Florida Supreme Court does not have
to account for its members of The Florida Bar or be liable for them, as it is
learned there is a major conflict of interest between the Florida Supreme Court
and the Florida Bar, in that the Florida Supreme Court insurance policy covers
the state actors who work for The Florida Bar, which is under the aegis of The
Florida Supreme Court as a direct extension of that court. My how the conflicts
continue to pile up, The Florida Supreme Court should have refused the case and
sent it to a federal court as they were conflicted. This decision means that
complaints against Matthew Triggs of Proskauer who violated his public offices
are not docketed and disposed of according to Florida law and acts to protect
Proskauer from immediate prosecution. This aiding and abetting is to be
challenged next at the United States Supreme Court, that also denies to hear the
case, which acts further to prevent the complaints from formal disposition and
the crimes to get buried. 2005 01 12 - Florida Supreme Court - Order,
Petitioners Motion for Judgment Non Prosequitur is Hereby Denied, There goes due
process and the right to complain against government officials found violating
Supreme Court rules. Hello Communist America. 2005 01 12 Florida Supreme Court
Petition for All Writs Jurisdiction Denied ~ Destroy Files 2005 01 13 09 587 734
United States Patent & Trademark Office approval of additional six month
suspension based on allegations of fraud on the USPTO and Iviewit. 2005 01 25 -
Draft Iviewit response to Florida Supreme Court Ruling 2005 01 26 SC04-1078
Iviewit filed with Supreme Court of Florida for a Motion for Rehearing
Clarification and Certification. 2005 02 03 Palm Beach Post NEWS ARTICLE
regarding Delray Beach Florida Drunk Driving Felony DUI with injury charges
against Christopher Clark Wheeler of Proskauer Rose. 2005 02 05 - BOCA RATON
NEWS ARTICLE Regarding Christopher Wheeler's DUI. What is amazing to note is
that Eric M. Turner of The Florida Bar (the guy who derails the Wheeler
complaints filed by Iviewit) attempts to defend Christopher Wheeler for his
drunk driving charges and he falsely states to the press that the DUI was a
Misdemeanor when in fact, it was charged as a felony due to the injuries
suffered by the victim. The DUI was a Felony charge as injury was incurred and
as noted in the Police Report. This shows unequivocally that Turner will go to
any length to protect Wheeler using The Florida Bar to achieve this end.
Wheeler's license was not suspended due to his DUI, perhaps Turner defended him.
Wonder if they had to give Turner a second briefcase for this? 2005 02 05
Florida Sun Sentinel NEWS ARTICLE regarding the arrest of Christopher Wheeler of
Proskauer for felony DUI with injury. 2005 02 14 09 630 939 United States Patent
& Trademark Office approval of additional six month suspension based on
allegations of fraud on the USPTO and Iviewit. 2005 02 15 The Florida Bar
responds to the Florida Supreme Court regarding the Motion for Clarification,
Rehearing and Certification filed by Iviewit. 2005 02 23 Supreme Court of New
York Appellate Division Second Department, Clerk, James E. Pelzer letter stating
he is taking the matter of the decisions to review by Diana Maxfield Kearse,
Chief Counsel of the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division Second
Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee and Lawrence DiGiovanna, Chairman
of the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division Second Department
Departmental Disciplinary Committee, instead of investigating as ordered by the
First Department justices to the Presiding Justice of the Supreme Court of New
York Appellate Division Second Department, A. Gail Prudenti, for a decision.
2005 02 23 Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division Second Department,
Clerk, James E. Pelzer letter stating he is taking the matter of the decisions
to review by Diana Maxfield Kearse, Chief Counsel of the Supreme Court of New
York Appellate Division Second Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee
and Lawrence DiGiovanna, Chairman of the Supreme Court of New York Appellate
Division Second Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee, instead of
investigating as ordered by the First Department justices to the Presiding
Justice of the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division Second Department,
A. Gail Prudenti, for a decision. 2005 02 25 Iviewit response to the European
Patent Office legal department, Lise Dybdahl, letter requesting suspension of
the European patent applications. 2005 03 01 Iviewit filed Motion to Florida
Supreme Court Case SC04-1078 regarding keeping The Florida Bar files on
Christopher C. Wheeler, Proskauer, Matthew Triggs, Eric M. Turner, John Anthony
Boggs, Lorraine Christine Hoffman, Kenneth Marvin and others for review by the
United States Supreme Court and other investigators. Requesting files be
maintained according to Florida Record Retention laws + for the 20 year life of
the patents, as the records are invaluable records and contain information in
the files of violations of public offices and other matters that have not been
investigated. 2005 03 05 Florida Supreme Court Docket Entry with the Christopher
Wheeler of Proskauer Driving Under the Influence Felony Charge against him,
welcome to Supreme Court history Chris, as the biggest ahole in court history.
2005 03 09 Insipid Little Cockroaches of Minimal Brain. Self explanatory draft.
2005 03 11 Iviewit letter to Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division Second
Department, Clerk, James E. Pelzer regarding conflicts of interest found with
State of New York Court of Appeals, Chief Judge of the State of New York, Judith
S. Kaye and Steven C. Krane and asking that any new investigators sign that they
have no conflicts with any of the Iviewit accused to prevent further conflicts
which force further complaints. 2005 03 14 Pictures of the Car Bombing of
Inventor Bernstein's Family Minivan that fire investigator Rick Lee of the
Boynton Beach Fire Department claimed was caused by accelarants and blew up
three cars next to it. The FBI appears to have lost both the investigation files
and the investigator regarding this and the Iviewit matters. The images use
Iviewit technology for zoom and panning on the images. Check out where the
minivan hood was blown out, was this where the car bomb was??? 2005 03 14
Pictures of the Car Bombing of Inventor Bernstein's Family Minivan that fire
investigator Rick Lee of the Boynton Beach Fire Department claimed was caused by
accelarants and blew up three cars next to it. The FBI appears to have lost both
the investigation files and the investigator regarding this and the Iviewit
matters. The images use Iviewit technology for zoom and panning on the images.
Check out where the minivan hood was blown out, was this where the car bomb
was??? 2005 03 16 Iviewit letter to Stephen Lucchesi of the Federal Bureau of
Investigation regarding the bombing of inventor Eliot I. Bernstein's family
minivan and request that he enjoin investigation per Rick Lee of Boynton Beach
Florida fire department. This letter and the rest of the two years of Iviewit
files regarding the patent crimes and other crimes against the United States are
lost and so is Lucchesi who disappears from the Department of Justice and even
they do not know where he is. The FBI Palm Beach office refers the matter to the
Department of Justice Inspector General, Glenn Fine, who requests that the FBI
Office of Professional Responsibility investigate. 2005 03 16 Iviewit letter to
Stephen Lucchesi of the Federal Bureau of Investigation regarding the bombing of
inventor Eliot I. Bernstein's family minivan and request that he enjoin
investigation per Rick Lee of Boynton Beach Florida fire department. This letter
and the rest of the two years of Iviewit files regarding the patent crimes and
other crimes against the United States are lost and so is Lucchesi who
disappears from the Department of Justice and even they do not know where he is.
The FBI Palm Beach office refers the matter to the Department of Justice
Inspector General, Glenn Fine, who requests that the FBI Office of Professional
Responsibility investigate. 2005 03 17 Hague Police to have FBI contact them.
2005 03 18 Diana Maxfield Kearse, Chief Counsel of the Supreme Court of New York
Appellate Division Second Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee sends a
letter stating that they had lost a letter and it was mysteriously returned by
the post office. The letter attempts to claim an investigation was done by a
Committee in hopes that the fact that she reviewed the matter and dismissed it
on review was now moot somehow. What fails to be noted is the fact that this was
an investigation that none of the accused had to respond to, no witnesses
provided were interviewed, no documents were examined. This document serves for
further charges against Kearse for even attempting to use the Supreme Court of
New York Appellate Division Second Department Departmental Disciplinary
Committee letterhead to continue the cover up for the accused. The document
appears to be evidence of mail fraud as well. 2005 03 27 Steven Krane NYSBA
Positions. 2005 04 05 Krane ties to Bush. 2005 04 09 New York Supreme Second
Dept Pelzer Letter Krane comments 2005 04 09 Supreme Court of New York Appellate
Division Second Department, Clerk, James E. Pelzer, letter whereby Pelzer, who
is not an actor in the disciplinary, now attempts to claim that A. Gail Prudenti
had decided to blow off the investigations, which he tries to now claim were
completed, although all prior information states no investigation was done in
lieu of being dismissed on review, inapposite the First Department court order
stating immediate investigation was to be done. He attempts to defend Krane,
showing his obvious bias, instead of relying on the supposed investigations
conclusions where we are sure Krane had a lawyer representing his interests.
This attempts to conclude based on a dismissal on review that Krane was not
conflicted using department letterhead to deny due process and form a defense
for Krane. Pelzer nor Prudenti are part of the disciplinary process and are
conflicted with Krane and Kaye and what is amazing is that they should be
responding to the First Department court that ordered the investigation, not
Eliot Bernstein and Stephen Lamont. This is very telling. 2005 04 20 Response to
2005 04 09 Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division Second Department,
Clerk, James E. Pelzer, letter. Very interesting reading into how due process
was denied and how court ordered investigations were derailed. 2005 04 25
Florida Supreme Court Denial of Motion for Rehearing Clarification and
Certification. 2005 04 25 Pataki & Spitzer Cover Letter for Document 2005 05 25
European Patent Office "EPO" letter denying suspension of European patents and
referring the matters of fraud on the EPO to the Institute of Professional
Representatives before the European Patent Office "EPI" which regulates licensed
legal representatives. Later the EPI during an investigation, sends over
documents including a document in response to an official office action that is
missing exhibits and the language of the letter is altered, evidencing fraud on
the EPO. Iviewit has requested immediate intervention by the FBI and Interpol to
inspect the documents for forgery and fraud upon the EPO, this has gone into
limbo, especially because the FBI investigator and Iviewit FBI files are now
missing from the FBI. The matters of the FBI have been elevated to the
Department of Justice Inspector General Glenn A. Fine and H. Marshall Jarrett of
the FBI Office of Professional Responsibility for investigation. 2005 06 18 -
Iviewit Florida Supreme Court Case Docket SC04-1078. 2005 06 18 Iviewit letter
to James Groody of the United States Patent & Trademark Office & Department of
Justice Inspector General Glenn Fine regarding the USPTO suspensions. 2005 06 20
Letter to USPTO, FBI and others regarding viral attachments to emails and
reporting of such activity to the Internet Crime Bureau. 2005 06 27 Department
of Business Professional Regulation Lewin. 2005 07 13 Supreme Court Petition for
Extension of Time. 2005 07 20 - 09 587730 United States Patent & Trademark
Office suspension, second six months out of three possible. 2005 08 14 Steven C.
Krane at Proskauer is counsel for the New York State Bar Association. 2005 08 26
Letter from the European Patent Office regarding patent filing 00955352 being
lost. 2005 10 03 United States Patent & Trademark Office dismisses Iviewit
Petition to revive abandoned patent 09 522 721, although Moatz has requested
that all abandoned patents be revived. Interesting that it is sent to Blakely
Sokoloff after Iviewit had filed to have all prior patent counsel removed from
the applications as they are and remain under investigation by Harry I. Moatz,
Director of the Office of Enrollment and Discipline for the United States Patent
& Trademark Office. 2005 10 05 Iviewit Patent 09 587 026 Notice of Abandonment
from the United States Patent & Trademark Office. 2005 11 18 Chris Mercer of the
Institute of Professional Representatives before the European Patent Office EPI
Mercer Investigation. This investigation would at first be closed and then
reopened leading to discovery of fraudulent documents in the EPO files. 2005 11
28 United States Supreme Court Denial of Writ of Certiorari to review the
Florida Supreme Court case. This wholly blocks Iviewit from filing complaints
against public officers found violating Florida Supreme Court office positions.
2005 12 21 Iviewit response to the European Patent Office regarding suspending
the patents pending investigations of fraud on the EPO. 2006 01 06 inewswire.
2006 01 07 Iviewit News Release regarding Representative Nita M. Lowey (D-NY
18th) taking the Iviewit matters to Representative John D. Dingell (D-MI 15th),
Chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, who then forwards the
matters for investigation to the House Judiciary Committee, under the direction
of The Honorable John Conyers Jr. (D-MI 14th). 2006 01 18 Iviewit NEWS ARTICLE
by Sachin Garg of Eworld. Garg was threatened by unknown parties to take down
the article. 2006 01 19 NEWS ARTICLE "Tech Dirt" reports on Iviewit. 2006 03 03
United States Patent & Trademark Office Commissioner letter response to Iviewit
letter to John J. Doll. 2006 04 06 Institute of Professional Representatives
before the European Patent Office letter to refile the Iviewit complaints and be
more specific. 2006 04 19 Iviewit letter to The Honorable United States Senator
Dianne Feinstein written at the direction of Harry I. Moatz who stated Iviewit
would need congressional help on certain issues, like getting information on IP
that was listed on the Iviewit IP dockets as Iviewit's but is not on file with
the United States Patent & Trademark Office the same and where the USPTO cannot
release information to Iviewit as the inventors are not listed on certain
applications and the owners and assignees are not Iviewit. 2006 04 19 Iviewit
letter to The Honorable United States Senator Dianne Feinstein written at the
direction of Harry I. Moatz who stated Iviewit would need congressional help on
certain issues, like getting information on IP that was listed on the Iviewit IP
dockets as Iviewit's but is not on file with the United States Patent &
Trademark Office the same and where the USPTO cannot release information to
Iviewit as the inventors are not listed on certain applications and the owners
and assignees are not Iviewit. 2006 06 16 Iviewit response to the Florida
Department of Business and Professional Relations regarding their finding of no
probably cause regarding Gerald Lewin, Erika Lewin and Goldstein Lewin & Co.
sent to the Inspector General of the DBPR. 2006 07 25 Charlie Crist conflict
with Foley & Lardner article, may provide answers as to how the Iviewit
complaints were derailed in Florida. 2006 08 02 Institute of Professional
Reperesentatives before the European Patent Office, Chris Mercer letter. 2006 08
14 Iviewit letter to Chris Mercer, President, Institute of Professional
Representatives before the European Patent Office demanding investigation. 2006
08 19 US SUPREME COURT CASE 05-6611 Iviewit case docket. 2006 09 19 Institute of
Professional Representative before the European Patent Office letter response to
Iviewit letter of August 2, 2006. 2006 09 29 Iviewit to Nita Lowey US Congress.
2006 11 03 Stephen R. Kaye of Proskauer Rose and husband to Chief Judge of New
York, Judith Kaye, death notice. Now have to sue estate for his involvement.
Strange that Kaye becomes a partner in the IP department of Proskauer??? 2006 11
28 Representative Nita M. Lowey (D-NY 18th) letter to Iviewit that she was
transferring the Iviewit case matters to incoming Chairman of the House Energy &
Commerce Committee Representative John D. Dingell (D-MI 15th). Dingell then
forwards the matters to The Honorable John Conyers Jr. (D-MI 14th) - Chairman of
the House Judiciary Committee where the matters are under investigation. 2006
Kaye Proskauer Owns New York Article. 2006 Proskauer link to Valerie Plame
issues. 2007 01 11 Iviewit Press Release regarding Representative John D.
Dingell (D-MI 15th) sending the Iviewit matters to The Honorable John Conyers
Jr. (D-MI 14th) - Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee where it sits in
review. 2007 01 18 Iviewit letter to the House Judiciary Committee regarding the
Iviewit matters forwarded by Chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee
Representative John D. Dingell (D-MI 15th). 2007 01 19 Iviewit Press Release
regarding Representative John D. Dingell (D-MI 15th) sending the Iviewit matters
to The Honorable John Conyers Jr. (D-MI 14th) - Chairman of the House Judiciary
Committee where it sits in review. Final. 2007 01 28 Lou Dobbs of CNN on Skull &
Bones. It is interesting to note that Skull and Bones member Luce started Time
which owns CNN. 2007 02 01 FINAL Iviewit request to The Honorable United States
Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) for congressional aid in the Iviewit matters.
2007 02 01 List of ongoing and derailed investigations included in the petition
for congressional aid for the Iviewit matters. 2007 02 05 Iviewit letter
response to the European Patent Office letter tendered by Wim van der Eijk. 2007
04 05 President of the Institute of Professional Representatives before the
European Patent Office, Chris Mercer letter response to Iviewit, this leads to
learning that documents at the European Patent Office are fraudulent and have
been changed in route to the EPO. 2007 04 09 Iviewit Response to EPO Letter
FINAL. 2007 04 10 Wim van der Eijk letter from the European Patent Office in
response to 2007 02 05 Iviewit letter. 2007 04 17 Iviewit Request for FBI IA and
OIG investigation of FBI case. 2007 04 20 Iviewit request for the Federal Bureau
of Investigations to launch an internal affairs probe into the missing case
files of Iviewit, missing car bombing files regarding the bombing of inventor
Bernstein's family minivan and the missing FBI investigator Stephen Lucchesi.
2007 06 11 EPO response from Wim van der Ejik regarding the documents sent by
Chris Mercer, President of the Institute of Professional Representatives before
the European Patent Office during his investigation which clearly show that
documents were tampered with that were sent to the EPO for the patents. 2007 06
14 Iviewit request for the Federal Bureau of Investigations to launch an
internal affairs probe into the missing case files of Iviewit, missing car
bombing files regarding the bombing of inventor Bernstein's family minivan and
the missing FBI investigator Stephen Lucchesi. FINAL 2007 06 18 Enron Broadband
Exec Sentenced. 2007 06 28 Iviewit letter sent to Alain Pompidou, President of
the European Patent Office c/o Aidan Kendrick and Wim van der Eijk, Principal
Director of the European Patent Office regarding the fraudulent documents found
in the investigation by the Institute of Professional Representatives before the
European Patent Office. 2007 07 16 United States Department of Justice, Federal
Bureau of Investigation Office of Professional Responsibility, H. Marshall
Jarrett, Counsel begins review of the Iviewit matters regarding missing FBI case
files for the Iviewit matters, the matters of the car bombing of inventor
Bernstein's family minivan and the missing FBI investigator, Stephen Lucchesi.
2001 07 17 Iviewit Patent IP docket prepared by Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman
showing patents were filed for Brian Utley by Foley & Lardner by Douglas Boehm
and Steven Becker under the direction of William J. Dick and other problems.
2007 Denial of Due Process Exhibit. 2007 07 23 Iviewit New York State Commission
of Investigation Complaint. 2007 07 30 NEWS ARTICLE - Jerusalem Post article
showing how Proskauer aided Nazi cause and prevented boycott of Germany,
allowing further mass destruction of human life. In Jewish lingo, Jews who aided
and abetted Nazi's were deemed Judenrat. 2007 07 30 Jerusalem Post Proskauer
Aided Nazi Cause. 2007 08 05 NEWS ARTICLE "Expose Corrupt Courts" article
regarding Thomas J. Cahill of the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division
First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee involved in whitewashing
complaints. 2007 08 08 Cahill problems in New York 1.xps 2007 08 09 and 19 State
of New York Commission of Investigation letter from Anthony Cartusciello, Deputy
Commissioner, denying investigation even though Thomas Cahill corruptions are
being exposed at the First Department. 2007 08 09 2007 08 09 and 19 State of New
York Commission of Investigation letter from Anthony Cartusciello, Deputy
Commissioner, denying investigation even though Thomas Cahill corruptions are
being exposed at the First Department. 2007 08 10 Enron Broadband Article Re
Execs seeking dismissal. 2007 08 18 Iviewit letter to Andrew Cuomo regarding the
uncovering of public office corruption of Thomas Cahill, Chief Counsel of the
New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department Departmental
Disciplinary Committee and to open immediate investigation of Cahill and the
investigations of Proskauer Rose, Kenneth Rubenstein, Steven C. Krane, Raymond
A. Joao, Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolf & Schlissel and others involved in the
denial of due process of the Iviewit complaints. 2007 08 18 Iviewit letter to
State of New York Commission of Investigation, Anthony Cartusciello, Deputy
Commissioner, in rebuttal to his denying investigation in light of the unfolding
ethics scandal at the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First
Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee and request to reconsider. 2007
08 27 The Nation - Gonzales Resigns. 2007 09 05 Iviewit letter to Eliot Spitzer
as Governor of New York to begin immediate investigation in light of the
unfolding ethics scandal at the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division
First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee and Thomas J. Cahill and
request to reopen all Iviewit cases against members of the department and those
involved in the theft of Iviewit Intellectual properties. 2007 09 24 New York
Attorney General Andrew Cuomo letter denying Iviewit investigation. 2007 10 08
Christine C. Anderson lawsuit Case No. 07 Civ. 9599 (SAS) Christine C. Anderson
v. the State of New York, et al. in the United States District Court Southern
District of New York under The Honorable Justice Shira A. Scheindlin. The filed
complaint by Anderson who was an attorney for the New York Supreme Court
Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee who
names Iviewit as part of her claims of the department "whitewashing" complaints,
destroying case file information, physical assault for not following orders and
other public office crimes. Anderson claims Thomas J. Cahill and others are
involved. Cahill is the former Chief Counsel who resigned as the scandal began
breaking who handled the Iviewit complaints and is currently under investigation
by Martin Gold. 2007 10 31 New York Law Journal Exposes allegations of
corruption at the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department
Departmental Disciplinary Committee regarding Thomas Cahill, former Chief
Counsel, who resigns amist the unfolding scandal and the whistleblower lawsuit
filed by former employee of the First Department Disciplinary Committee,
Christine C. Anderson. Case No. 07 Civ. 9599 (SAS) Christine C. Anderson v. the
State of New York, et al. in the United States District Court Southern District
of New York under The Honorable Justice Shira A. Scheindlin. 2007 11 01 New York
Times exposes allegations of corruption at the New York Supreme Court Appellate
Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee regarding Thomas
Cahill, former Chief Counsel, who resigns amist the unfolding scandal and the
whistleblower lawsuit filed by former employee of the First Department
Disciplinary Committee, Christine C. Anderson. Case No. 07 Civ. 9599 (SAS)
Christine C. Anderson v. the State of New York, et al. in the United States
District Court Southern District of New York under The Honorable Justice Shira
A. Scheindlin. 2007 11 22 Iviewit Press Release regarding the New York Law
Journal and New York Times exposing allegations of corruption at the New York
Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary
Committee regarding Thomas Cahill, former Chief Counsel, who resigns amist the
unfolding scandal and the whistleblower lawsuit filed by former employee of the
First Department Disciplinary Committee, Christine C. Anderson. Case No. 07 Civ.
9599 (SAS) Christine C. Anderson v. the State of New York, et al. in the United
States District Court Southern District of New York under The Honorable Justice
Shira A. Scheindlin. 2007 12 11 Iviewit preliminary filing of 1.5 billion dollar
lawsuit in the United States District Court Southern District of New York under
The Honorable Justice Shira A. Scheindlin. The Iviewit case is in efforts to
support former employee of the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First
Department Disciplinary Committee, Christine C. Anderson's heroic efforts to
expose corruption in the department. Case No. 07 Civ. 9599 (SAS) Christine C.
Anderson v. the State of New York, et al. 2007 12 12 Iviewit filing of 1.5
billion dollar lawsuit in the United States District Court Southern District of
New York under The Honorable Justice Shira A. Scheindlin. The Iviewit case,
Docket No. # 07 Civ. 11196 (SAS) Eliot I. Bernstein, et al. v. Appellate
Division First Department, Department Disciplinary Committee et al. is filed in
effort to support former employee of the New York Supreme Court Appellate
Division First Department Disciplinary Committee, Christine C. Anderson's heroic
efforts to expose corruption in the department. Case No. 07 Civ. 9599 (SAS)
Christine C. Anderson v. the State of New York, et al. The filed amended
complaint adds hundreds of defendants and claims damages over one trillion
dollars, as the RICO element of the case forces the Iviewit patent crimes into
the filing that began as support on disciplinary matters denying due process.
2007 12 21 Docket No. # 07 Civ. 11196 (SAS) Eliot I. Bernstein, et al. v.
Appellate Division First Department, Department Disciplinary Committee et al.
United States District Court Southern District of New York, Shira A. Scheindlin
MOTION FOR: APPOINTMENT OF PRO BONO COUNSEL; EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE AMENDED
COMPLAINT AFTER ORIGINAL COMPLAINT HAS BEEN FILED ON SOME OR ALL OF THE
DEFENDANTS; ORDER FOR THE UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE TO SERVE PAPERS ON
REMAINING OR ALL OF THE DEFENDANTS; ACCEPT LIMITED POWER OF ATTORNEY OF PLANTIFF
BERNSTEIN AND PLANTIFF LAMONT; ACCEPT REMOTE APPEARANCE OF PLAINTIFF BERNSTEIN
FOR COURT PROCEEDINGS; AND PHYSICAL PROTECTION OF PLAINTIFFS FOR COURT
APPEARANCES. 2008 01 09 Court Order United States District Court, Southern
District of New York NY case 07CV 11196 SAS. 2008 01 15 Iviewit Press from
Yonkers Tribune on UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
filing. 2008 01 23 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Memo to US Marshal re Extra Copies. 2008 01 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT,
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Notice to Serve Courtesy Copies on Attorney
General. 2008 02 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Letter re missing service papers. 2008 03 03 USPTO Non Recordation Sheet of
Assignment. 2008 03 05 Final Plaintiff Opposition to AG Cuomo letter email copy.
2008 03 05 Final Plaintiff Opposition to Proskauer letter as counsel. 2008 03 07
Scheindlin Order re conflicts. 2008 03 10 Scheindlin Order re conflicts. 2008 03
13 FINAL Plaintiff Response to Scheindlin March 07 2008 Order. 2008 03 14 FINAL
Letter to NY AG to reopen investigation on new evidence. 2008 03 20 Memo of Law
in Support of TFB Motion to Dismiss Greenberg Traurig. 2008 03 20 Notice of
Motion for Florida Bar et al filed Greenberg Traurig. 2008 03 21 Order
Scheindlin. 2008 03 28 Notice of Appearance Friedman for Foley. 2008 03 28
Scheindlin Order re Foley counsel. 2008 04 01 Motion in Opposition to Motion to
Dismiss for Florida Bar et al filed Greenberg Traurig. 2008 04 06 FINAL FILED
Motion for Allow Filing of an Amended Complaint1. 2008 04 07 FILED FINAL Motion
in Opposition to Florida Bar. 2008 04 08 US Department of Justice Refuse to
Investigate Letter. 2008 04 11 Iviewit Response to FBI OPR letter signed sent
and printed copy. 2008 04 15 FINAL SENT TO COURT and Letter to Virginia Bar
Counsel Attorney General Hall re phone conv.doc 2008 04 21 FINAL SIGNED Motion
for Pro Bono Counsel low. 2008 04 23 Connell Motion for VA AG Pro Hac Vice. 2008
05 02 Foley Anker Appearance and letter re conflicts. 2008 05 02 Foley Anker to
Bernstein to stop contacting Foley. 2008 05 09 FINAL AMENDED COMPLAINT AND RICO
SIGNED COPY HIGH.doc 2008 05 09 FINAL AMENDED COMPLAINT AND RICO SIGNED COPY
LOW.doc 2008 05 09 FINAL AMENDED COMPLAINT AND RICO SIGNED COPY MED.doc 2008 05
09 FINAL MOTION FOR PRO SE DESK TO COPY AMENDED COMPLAINT.doc 2008 05 09
Proskauer to Scheindlin to block amended. 2008 05 09 Scheindlin Order to stay
amended. 2008 05 13 Proskauer Request for Amended Complaint. 2008 05 13 Request
for Clarification on Order dated May 9th 2008. 2008 05 13 Scheindlin Order
Denying Pro Se Copying. 2008 05 15 FINAL Motion in Opposition to Order. 60 233
341 - 57103-123 - Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman Utley Stolen Patents. 60 233
341 - 57103-123 Utley Theft. 60 233 344 - 57103-122 - BLAKELY SOKOLOFF TAYLOR &
ZAFMAN Copy Utley Theft 2. 60 233 344 - Utley Zoom and Pan Camera Filing. 872 99
99 air d&o insurance policy face page Anthony Boggs Message Regarding Kelly
Overstreet Johnson Cannot Accept Files - After it was discovered that she had
conflicts of interest with Wheeler brother - Windows Media File Armstrong Hersh
Documents Part 2. ARTHUR ANDERSEN FILES Bankruptcy documentation of Intel/RYJO
Utley Reale Hersh they file on companies they have no contracts with and get
caught. At the time we did not know these were mirror companies of the
shareholder companies with stolen patents. We thought they filed on the wrong
companies and were idiots. It was not until the patent office told us that
patents were in some of these companies that we learned that Proskauer had
fraudulently set up corporations that mirrored companies and had second set of
stolen patents going into them. This action was filed without company knowledge
and the company found out from AOLTW/WB that this action existed. Barroway Bar
Complaint Final. Barroway Breach Issues.doc Blakely Letter to USPTO removing
Utley from patents never happened. Blakely patent portfolio versus Foley and
Meltzer. BSTZ Japanese Filings Portfolio. BSTZ Japanese Filing of Utley Patent
after he is gone. bush-kerry-yale. conspiracies.htm Crossbow Ventures and on
Behalf of the SBA files charges of Fraud On the United States Patent & Trademark
Office with Iviewit. Depositions (Eliot Bernstein, Simon Bernstein, Kenneth
Rubenstein, Christopher Wheeler, Gerald Lewin, William Kasser, Brian Utley)
SEARCHABLE with hyperlink comments Dick Involvement with Utley at Diamond Turf
Equipment, Inc. and Virginia Bar Statement. Dick Statement Contradict Utley on
Filing Patent. Eliot Timeline of email 98-99.tif Ellen DeGeneres Video
Netfomercial Regarding Iviewit EPO fraud filing. Erika Lewin notes on corporate
structure to Ernst Young Completely false and misleading. Exhibit B - Tiedemann
Prolow Loan Documents. Exhibit B2 Utley Employment Agreement and Non Compete.
Exhibit I Lewin COI and Wheeler. Flaster withdraw as counsel. Florida supreme
court case docket sc04-1078. Foley Lardner Patent Portfolio submitted to the
Virginia Bar. When this was sent to Harry Moatz at the United States Patent
Office it was found to contain false and misleading information regarding
certain patent applications. FREE PRESS INTERNATIONAL Bush and Kerry both admit
to being members of Skull and Bones.htm Gail Prudenti Judith kayo conflict.
grebe1. grebe2. grebe3. grebe4. Holy Grail Articles I-Newswire Press Release on
Data Compression Article. Investigations Master Sheet Showing Denial of Due
Process and Procedure for derailed investigations.htm Investor Presentation
v2.ppt Iviewit / Cyberfyds Early Site Iviewit Master Attorney Document. Iviewit
Press Release Sachin Garg Eworld. Iviewit Press Release. Iviewit Stock Certs.
JOAO and Utley PATENTS.doc Joao at Dreier Baritz Law Firm. Joao at Dugan and
Dugan PC. Joao destroying documents. Joao distance learning patent. JOAO FIRST
BILLING MISSING FEBRUARY FILING WHICH HE HAS RECEIPT FOR< WHERE DID IT GO?. Joao
Inventions 2.MDI Joao Inventions List. Jiao patents 2.mdi Jiao patents. Joao was
told of bad claims prior to filing by Utley. Joao's biggest client himself
article. Johnson receipt of Triggs complaint. Kasser Corporate Books. Kaye
Article Proskauer In Firm kayo Prudenti accepts awards for her. kayo Prudenti on
board together. kayo Prudenti problems in other case. Krane bio 2 Krane
President of NY Bar Rubenstein. Krane Proskauer Bio. Krane Suicide Letter
Tendered in Conflict and Violation of Public Office in Response to Complaint
against him and Proskauer Letter to Jackie Selebi President of Interpol. Letter
to the Honorable Senator Dianne Feinstein D California Signed. Lewin Deposition
Fingering Rubenstein Lewin Deposition on Memory page 666 LEWIN video list of bar
actions and others List of Patent Suspensions List of State Federal and other
crimes Lucchesi letter re Interpol. Mark Gaffney Supporting Documents.htm
Matthew Triggs of Proskauer represents Wheeler while in blackout period of his
Supreme Court of Florida Bar position in conflict of interest and violation of
public office. missing inventors Jiao and foley. missing inventors Jiao patents
told to wheeler and Foley 1.wav missing inventors Jiao patents told to wheeler
and Foley 2.wav Motion for Mistrial Version 4_Final. Motion for Rubenstein and
Wheeler to resume depositions. Narine Bar Complaint Final. NDA - Goldman Sachs -
Jeffrey Friedstein. NDA Infringers. node violators New York State Bar
Represented by Proskauer Rose making whole bar disciplinary system conflicted.
News Crossbow Iviewit Investment 1500000 News Crossbow Iviewit Investment
1500000 New York Bar Association STRIKE RUBENSTEIN RESPONSE - COMPLAINT AGAINST
KRANE. office of solicitor general. Officers Directors Professionals Summary
Version 2.doc Outline of Crimes Patent Pool Infringers patentforfraud.htm press
Ellen DeGeneres full story. Proskauer Bills - Summary General Ledger. Proskauer
Client Infringers Proskauer Intellectual Property Billings Rubenstein Proskauer
Patent Bills. Proskauer plume Wilson lawsuit. Proskauer Rose v. Iviewit -
Pleadings 1 2001 05 to 2002 08 PROSKAUER RUBENSTEIN PATENT POOLS Proskauer
Technology Department 2. Proskauer v Iviewit CA 01 04671 AB Proskauer v Iviewit
CA 01 04671 AB. Proskauer Wheeler Business Plan Bills Proskauer Wheeler Patent
Copyright and related bills Prudenti Proskauer conflicts. Real 3D and Huizenga
info. Real 3D Opinion and Licensing Info. Response to AICPA Final Executed.
Response_to_Garcia_Stallone_Version_1. RICO CRIME CHARTS Rubenstein as counsel
2. Rubenstein Deposition I know nothing. Rubenstein Joao Utley Filipek Meeting
NY Rubenstein Office. RYJO LETTER WARNING OF USING IVIEWIT TECH INTEL HERSH.
RYJO/INTEL claim Iviewit technologies as their own and seek intellectual
properties on iviewit technology while under node SBA Loan Due Diligence Utley
Sends info with Rubenstein as Board Member. Selz message on Rubenstein and
Proskauer wheeler. SHAREHOLDER STATEMENTS BOOKMARKED Shareholders Shareholders
skull 10.MDI Skull 7 Bush Plame. skull 8.MDI skull 9.MDI skull1. skull2. skull3
cobs news. skull4.MDI skull4. skull5. skull6.MDI Stephen Selz, Esq.. message on
Rubenstein and wheeler documents showing the opposite of their statements to
courts and bars STOCK CERT HUIZENGA CANCELLED. Stock Certs for Iviewit
Technologies, Inc. Summary of Damages Tech Dirt Iviewit News. The Fight for the
Grail TRADEMARK ASSIGNMENTS AND LISTS. USPTO cannot give information on Utley
patent1. USPTO CFR 37 CONSOLIDATED RULES USPTO correspondence two. USPTO USC
Title 35 Patent Laws Utley Background Lies Exposed During His Deposition forgot
to put on resume Proskauer Wheeler tendered that Foley's Dick, Wheeler and
himself were found stealing patents at his last job Utley Deposition Dick Never
Filed Patent at Diamond Turf contradicts Dick's statement to Virginia Bar that
he did. Utley Deposition PATENT PROBLEMS Diamond Turf 1. Utley Deposition PATENT
PROBLEMS Diamond Turf. Utley Deposition Wheeler Knew About Diamond Turf 2. Utley
Deposition Wheeler Knew About Diamond Turf. Utley Deposition Wheeler Never
Represented Me - Wheeler contradicts this in his deposition saying he
represented Utley. Utley Deposition camera application. UTLEY DEPOSITION DIAMOND
TURF PATENT PROBLEMS. Utley Deposition NO COLLEGE CLEAN. Utley Deposition
Patents All Assigned to Iviewit. Utley Deposition Rubenstein Not An Advisor.
Utley Dick Attorney at DIAMOND TURF EQUIPMENT, INC.. Utley Patent Dispute at
DIAMOND TURF EQUIPMENT, INC. Utley Resume - Perfect Copy. Utley Statement for
Dick Foley Virginia Bar Response. Utley stolen patent samples Utley to Joao
Major Missing Items in patent - clean copy. Virginia Bar bar. Virginia Bar fl
bar correspondences Williams turner. Weisberg and Selz orders from Schiffrin
Barroway. Wheeler Articles FAU Scandal & Fuzion Fraud. Wheeler Deposition
Iviewit Portal not Inventions. Wheeler Deposition I represented Utley. Wheeler
Deposition Regarding Conflicts Check. Wheeler deposition stating NO PATENT
OPINION. Wheeler Guilty of Felony DUI with Injury. Wheeler supplement to
deposition. Wheeler/Proskauer marketing letter with client list, show's that
Wheeler, Rubenstein and Proskauer knew far more about the technology than they
now claim Zakirul on feasibility study. Zakirul on Jiao having switch and
signing patents. Zakirul testimony on Jiao meeting wheeler4.wav Zakirul
testimony on Rubenstein Jiao meeting wheeler. Zakirul testimony on Rubenstein
Jiao meeting wheeler. Zakirul testimony on Rubenstein Jiao meeting wheeler2.wav
Zakirul testimony on Rubenstein Jiao meeting wheeler2.wav Zakirul testimony on
signing patents. Zakirul testimony on signing patents2.wav ZAKIRUL SHIRAJEE
SWORN STATEMENT. Zakirul Shirajee testimony on Rubenstein Joao patent disclosure
meetings at Wheeler's Proskauer office Zakirul Shirajee testimony Zakirul
Shirajee testimony 851 2000 06 14 Proskauer Rose Generated Business Plan Iviewit
with Rubenstein as Advisor Legal Counsel 1999 06 09 Proskauer Investigating
Lewin, CPA Document and Lewin Conflict Letter re Visual Data 1999 06 14
Proskauer Kept Confidentiality Agreements 2000 08 26 Iviewit Business Plan
Generated by Utley with Rubenstein as Advisor to Board Contradicting all
Deposition of Rubenstein Utley and Wheeler 2000 06 09 Document Service
International License Agreement. 2000 06 20 Goldman Sachs receiving Patents as
Investment Banker for Iviewit 1999 04 26 Goldstein Lewin Financial Projections
Iviewit 00938124.5Complete file. 00938126.0Complete file. 00942690.9Complete
file. 00955352.0Complete file. 00944619.6Complete file. 2007 07 16 US Department
of Justice Letter stating they are beginning review of the Iviewit matters
U.S. District Court United States District Court for the
Southern District of New York (Foley Square) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #:
1:07-cv-11196-SAS Bernstein et al v. Appellate Division First Department
Departmental Disciplinary Committee et al Assigned to: Judge Shira A. Scheindlin
Demand: $9,999,000 Related Case: 1:07-cv-09599-SAS Cause: 18:1961 Racketeering
(RICO) Act Date Filed: 12/12/2007 Jury Demand: Plaintiff Nature of Suit: 470
Racketeer/Corrupt Organization Jurisdiction: Federal Question Plaintiff Eliot I.
Bernstein Individually represented by Eliot I. Bernstein PRO SE Plaintiff Eliot
I. Bernstein represented by Eliot I. Bernstein (See above for address) PRO SE
Plaintiff P. Stephen Lamont on behalf of Shareholders of Iviewit Holdings, Inc.,
Iviewit Technologies, Inc., Uview.com, Inc., Iviewit.com, Inc., I.C., Inc.,
Iviewit.com LLC, Iviewit LLC, Iviewit Corporation, Iviewit, Inc., and Patent
Interest Holders represented by P. Stephen Lamont PRO SE V. Defendant Appellate
Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee Defendant Thomas
J. Cahill in his official capacity Defendant Thomas J. Cahill in his individual
capacity Defendant Joseph Wigley in his official capacity Defendant Joseph
Wigley in his individual capacity Defendant Catherine O'Hagen Wolfe in their
official capacity Defendant Catherine O'Hagen Wolfe in their individual capacity
Defendant Paul Curran in their official capacity Defendant Paul Curran in
individual capacity Defendant Martin R. Gold in his individual capacity
Defendant Martin R. Gold in their official capacity Defendant Hon. Angela M.
Mazzarelli in her official capacity Defendant Angela M. Mazzarelli in her
individual capacity Defendant Hon. Richard T. Andrias in his official capacity
Defendant Richard T. Andrias in his individual capacity Defendant Hon. David B.
Saxe in his official capacity Defendant David B. Saxe in his individual capacity
Defendant Hon. David Friedman in his official capacity Defendant David Friedman
in his individual capacity Defendant Hon. Luiz A. Gonzales in his official
capacity Defendant Luiz A. Gonzales in his individual capacity Defendant
Appellate Division Second Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee
Defendant Lawrence DiGiovanna in his official capacity Defendant Lawrence
DiGiovanna in his individual capacity Defendant Diana Maxfield Kearse in her
official capacity Defendant Diana Maxfield Kearse in her individual capacity
Defendant James E. Peltzer in his official capacity Defendant James E. Peltzer
in his individual capacity Defendant Hon. A. Gail Prudenti in her official
capacity Defendant A. Gail Prudenti in her individual capacity Defendant Steven
C. Krane in his official capacity Defendant Steven C. Krane in his individual
capacity Defendant Hon. Judith S. Kaye in her official capacity Defendant Judith
S. Kaye in her individual capacity Defendant Kenneth Rubenstein Defendant Estate
of Stephen Kaye Defendant Proskauer Rose LLP Defendant Meltzer Lippe Goldstein &
Breistone LLP Defendant Lewis S. Meltzer Defendant Raymond A. Joao Defendant
Foley Lardner LLP Defendant Michael C. Grebe Defendant William J. Dick Defendant
Douglas A. Boehm Defendant Steven C. Becker Defendant State of New York
Commission of Investigation Defendant Lawyers Fund for Client Protection of the
State of New York Defendant The Florida Bar Defendant Lorraine Christine Hoffman
in her official capacity Defendant Lorraine Christine Hoffman in her individual
capacity Defendant Eric Turner in his official capacity Defendant Eric Turner in
his individual capacity Defendant John Anthony Boggs in his official capacity
Defendant John Anthony Boggs in his individual capacity Defendant Kenneth Marvin
in his official capacity Defendant Kenneth Marvin in his individual capacity
Defendant Thomas Hall in his official capacity Defendant Thomas Hall in his
individual capacity Defendant Debroah Yarborough in her official capacity
Defendant Debroah Yarborough in her individual capacity Defendant Virginia State
Bar Defendant Andrew H. Goodman in his official capacity Defendant Andrew H.
Goodman in his individual capacity Defendant Noel Sengel in her official
capacity Defendant Noel Sengel in her individual capacity Defendant Mary W.
Martelino in her individual capacity Defendant John Does Date Filed # Docket
Text 12/12/2007 1 COMPLAINT against Catherine O'Hagen Wolfe (in their individual
capacity), Paul Curran (in their official capacity), Paul Curran (in individual
capacity), Martin R. Gold (in his individual capacity), Martin R. Gold (in their
official capacity), Angela M. Mazzarelli (in her official capacity), Angela M.
Mazzarelli (in her individual capacity), Richard T. Andrias (in his official
capacity), Richard T. Andrias (in his individual capacity), David B. Saxe, David
B. Saxe, David Friedman (in his official capacity), David Friedman (in his
individual capacity), Luiz A. Gonzales (in his official capacity), Luiz A.
Gonzales (in his individual capacity), Appellate Division Second Department
Departmental Disciplinary Committee, Lawrence DiGiovanna (in his official
capacity), Lawrence DiGiovanna (in his individual capacity), Diana Maxfield
Kearse (in her official capacity), Diana Maxfield Kearse (in her individual
capacity), James E. Peltzer (in his official capacity), James E. Peltzer (in his
individual capacity), A. Gail Prudenti (in her official capacity), A. Gail
Prudenti (in her individual capacity), Steven C. Krane (in his official
capacity), Steven C. Krane (in his individual capacity), Judith S. Kaye, Judith
S. Kaye, Kenneth Rubenstein, Estate of Stephen Kaye, Proskauer Rose LLP, Meltzer
Lippe Goldstein & Breistone LLP, Lewis S. Meltzer, Raymond A. Joao, Foley
Lardner LLP, Michael C. Grebe, William J. Dick, Douglas A. Boehm, Steven C.
Becker, State of New York Commission of Investigation, Appellate Division First
Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee, Lawyers Fund for Client
Protection of the State of New York, The Florida Bar, Lorraine Christine Hoffman
(in her official capacity), Lorraine Christine Hoffman (in her individual
capacity), Eric Turner (in his official capacity), Eric Turner (in his
individual capacity), John Anthony Boggs (in his official capacity), John
Anthony Boggs (in his individual capacity), Kenneth Marvin (in his official
capacity), Kenneth Marvin (in his individual capacity), Thomas J. Cahill (in his
official capacity), Thomas Hall (in his official capacity), Thomas Hall (in his
individual capacity), Debroah Yarborough (in her official capacity), Debroah
Yarborough (in her individual capacity), Virginia State Bar, Andrew H. Goodman
(in his official capacity), Andrew H. Goodman (in his individual capacity), Noel
Sengel (in her official capacity), Noel Sengel (in her individual capacity),
Mary W. Martelino, Thomas J. Cahill (in his individual capacity), John Does,
Joseph Wigley (in his official capacity), Joseph Wigley (in his individual
capacity), Catherine O'Hagen Wolfe (in their official capacity). (Filing Fee $
350.00, Receipt Number 635712)Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein
(Individually), Eliot I. Bernstein, P. Stephen Lamont.(mbe) (Entered:
12/14/2007) 12/12/2007 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Catherine O'Hagen Wolfe (in their
individual capacity), Paul Curran (in their official capacity), Paul Curran (in
individual capacity), Martin R. Gold (in his individual capacity), Martin R.
Gold (in their official capacity), Angela M. Mazzarelli (in her official
capacity), Angela M. Mazzarelli (in her individual capacity), Richard T. Andrias
(in his official capacity), Richard T. Andrias (in his individual capacity),
David B. Saxe, David B. Saxe, David Friedman (in his official capacity), David
Friedman (in his individual capacity), Luiz A. Gonzales (in his official
capacity), Luiz A. Gonzales (in his individual capacity), Appellate Division
Second Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee, Lawrence DiGiovanna (in
his official capacity), Lawrence DiGiovanna (in his individual capacity), Diana
Maxfield Kearse (in her official capacity), Diana Maxfield Kearse (in her
individual capacity), James E. Peltzer (in his official capacity), James E.
Peltzer (in his individual capacity), A. Gail Prudenti (in her official
capacity), A. Gail Prudenti (in her individual capacity), Steven C. Krane (in
his official capacity), Steven C. Krane (in his individual capacity), Judith S.
Kaye, Judith S. Kaye, Kenneth Rubenstein, Estate of Stephen Kaye, Proskauer Rose
LLP, Meltzer Lippe Goldstein & Breistone LLP, Lewis S. Meltzer, Raymond A. Joao,
Foley Lardner LLP, Michael C. Grebe, William J. Dick, Douglas A. Boehm, Steven
C. Becker, State of New York Commission of Investigation, Appellate Division
First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee, Lawyers Fund for Client
Protection of the State of New York, The Florida Bar, Lorraine Christine Hoffman
(in her official capacity), Lorraine Christine Hoffman (in her individual
capacity), Eric Turner (in his official capacity), Eric Turner (in his
individual capacity), John Anthony Boggs (in his official capacity), John
Anthony Boggs (in his individual capacity), Kenneth Marvin (in his official
capacity), Kenneth Marvin (in his individual capacity), Thomas J. Cahill (in his
official capacity), Thomas Hall (in his official capacity), Thomas Hall (in his
individual capacity), Debroah Yarborough (in her official capacity), Debroah
Yarborough (in her individual capacity), Virginia State Bar, Andrew H. Goodman
(in his official capacity), Andrew H. Goodman (in his individual capacity), Noel
Sengel (in her official capacity), Noel Sengel (in her individual capacity),
Mary W. Martelino, Thomas J. Cahill (in his individual capacity), John Does,
Joseph Wigley (in his official capacity), Joseph Wigley (in his individual
capacity), Catherine O'Hagen Wolfe (in their official capacity). (mbe) (Entered:
12/14/2007) 12/12/2007 CASE REFERRED TO Judge Shira A. Scheindlin as possibly
related to 1:07-cv-9599. (mbe) (Entered: 12/14/2007) 12/21/2007 CASE ACCEPTED AS
RELATED. Create association to 1:07-cv-09599-SAS. Notice of Assignment to
follow. (laq) (Entered: 01/10/2008) 12/21/2007 4 NOTICE OF CASE ASSIGNMENT to
Judge Shira A. Scheindlin. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (laq)
(Entered: 01/10/2008) 12/21/2007 Magistrate Judge Douglas F. Eaton is so
designated. (laq) (Entered: 01/10/2008) 12/26/2007 2 MOTION for appointment of
pro bono counsel; MOTION for Extension of Time to file amended complaint after
original complaint has been filed on some or all of the defendants; MOTION for
order for the United States Marshal Service to serve papers on remaining or all
of the defendants; MOTION to accept limited power of attorney of plaintiff
Bernstein and Plaintiff Lamont Accept Remote appearance of plaintiff Bernstein
for Court Proceedings; and Physical Protection of Plaintiffs for Court
Appearances. Attached is Affidavit in Support. Document filed by Eliot I.
Bernstein (Individually), Eliot I. Bernstein. (djc) (Entered: 01/08/2008)
12/26/2007 3 DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS.
Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually). (djc) (Entered: 01/09/2008)
1/10/2008 Mailed notice to the attorney(s) of record. (laq) (Entered:
01/10/2008) 1/10/2008 5 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 2 Motion to
Appoint Counsel ; granting in part and denying in part 2 Motion for Extension of
Time; granting in part and denying in part 2 Motion to Serve; granting in part
and denying in part 2 Motion. For the reasons stated above, plaintiffs' motions
are granted in part and denied in part. The United States Marshals are directed
to serve the Complaint on defendants. Plaintiffs will have until twenty days
after service is completed on all defendants to file an amended complaint. The
Clerk of the Court is directed to close these motions (document no. 2 on the
docket sheet). (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 1/9/2008)(jmi) (Entered:
01/11/2008) 1/23/2008 AMENDED SUMMONS ISSUED as to Catherine O'Hagen Wolfe (in
their individual capacity), Paul Curran (in their official capacity), Paul
Curran (in individual capacity), Martin R. Gold (in his individual capacity),
Martin R. Gold (in their official capacity), Angela M. Mazzarelli (in her
official capacity), Angela M. Mazzarelli (in her individual capacity), Richard
T. Andrias (in his official capacity), Richard T. Andrias (in his individual
capacity), David B. Saxe, David B. Saxe, David Friedman (in his official
capacity), David Friedman (in his individual capacity), Luiz A. Gonzales (in his
official capacity), Luiz A. Gonzales (in his individual capacity), Appellate
Division Second Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee, Lawrence
DiGiovanna (in his official capacity), Lawrence DiGiovanna (in his individual
capacity), Diana Maxfield Kearse (in her official capacity), Diana Maxfield
Kearse (in her individual capacity), James E. Peltzer (in his official
capacity), James E. Peltzer (in his individual capacity), A. Gail Prudenti (in
her official capacity), A. Gail Prudenti (in her individual capacity), Steven C.
Krane (in his official capacity), Steven C. Krane (in his individual capacity),
Judith S. Kaye, Judith S. Kaye, Kenneth Rubenstein, Estate of Stephen Kaye,
Proskauer Rose LLP, Meltzer Lippe Goldstein & Breistone LLP, Lewis S. Meltzer,
Raymond A. Joao, Foley Lardner LLP, Michael C. Grebe, William J. Dick, Douglas
A. Boehm, Steven C. Becker, State of New York Commission of Investigation,
Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee, Lawyers
Fund for Client Protection of the State of New York, The Florida Bar, Lorraine
Christine Hoffman (in her official capacity), Lorraine Christine Hoffman (in her
individual capacity), Eric Turner (in his official capacity), Eric Turner (in
his individual capacity), John Anthony Boggs (in his official capacity), John
Anthony Boggs (in his individual capacity), Kenneth Marvin (in his official
capacity), Kenneth Marvin (in his individual capacity), Thomas J. Cahill (in his
official capacity), Thomas Hall (in his official capacity), Thomas Hall (in his
individual capacity), Debroah Yarborough (in her official capacity), Debroah
Yarborough (in her individual capacity), Virginia State Bar, Andrew H. Goodman
(in his official capacity), Andrew H. Goodman (in his individual capacity), Noel
Sengel (in her official capacity), Noel Sengel (in her individual capacity),
Mary W. Martelino, Thomas J. Cahill (in his individual capacity), John Does,
Joseph Wigley (in his official capacity), Joseph Wigley (in his individual
capacity), Catherine O'Hagen Wolfe (in their official capacity). (tro) (Entered:
01/25/2008) 3/7/2008 6 MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED
Summons and Complaint, served. David B. Saxe served on 2/28/2008, answer due
3/19/2008; David B. Saxe served on 2/28/2008, answer due 3/19/2008. Service was
accepted by David B. Saxe. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually);
Eliot I. Bernstein. (dle) (Entered: 03/10/2008) 3/10/2008 7 ORDER: I have
considered plaintiffs' request and have determined that the Attorney General
does not face an improper conflict of interest in representing the State
Defendants. If, however, the Attorney General concludes that an investigation of
defendants is warranted, then independent counsel would be required. Plaintiffs
request that the Court find that defendant Raymond A. Joao's counsel, alleged to
be John W. Fried is conflicted because Fried will be required to testify and may
be added as a defendant. Plaintiffs' request is denied at this time. Plaintiff
also request that the Court reconsider its earlier denial of plaintiffs' request
for pro bono counsel. Plaintiffs have presented no such decisions or factual
matters. The Request is denied. Defendants time to return waivers of personal
service is hereby extended until March 21, 2008. Defendants shall move or answer
no later than May 30, 2008. (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 3/7/2008) (jpo)
(Entered: 03/10/2008) 3/11/2008 8 MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF
SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Martin R. Gold (in his
individual capacity) served on 2/29/2008, answer due 3/20/2008; Martin R. Gold
(in their official capacity) served on 2/29/2008, answer due 3/20/2008. Document
filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein. (jmi) (Entered:
03/14/2008) 3/14/2008 9 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE. John Anthony Boggs (in his
official capacity) served on 3/4/2008, answer due 3/24/2008. Service was
accepted by John Anthony Boggs. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein. (djc)
(Entered: 03/17/2008) 3/19/2008 10 MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF
SERVICE UNEXECUTED as to Debroah Yarborough (in her official capacity).
Attempted Service of Summons and Complaint. Service was attempted on 3/12/08.
Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually), Eliot I. Bernstein. (pl)
(Entered: 03/20/2008) 3/21/2008 11 ORDER: plaintiffs are again reminded that
pursuant to Standing Order M10-468, all communications with the Court, including
all motions and letters are to be directed to the Court's Pro Se Office, not to
chambers. Violation of the Standing Order may lead to a finding of contempt of
court. Plaintiffs have requested reconsideration of the Court's Order dated
March 7, 2008. The Court declines to revisit its earlier decision. Plaintiffs
have also requested legal advice on several topics. The Court does not give
legal advice to parties. Plaintiffs have requested legal advice on several
topics. The Court does not give legal advice to parties. Plaintiffs have
requested that the Court notify the appropriate authorities of defendants'
alleged criminal misconduct. At this early stage of the litigation, such
notification would be both inappropriate and premature. Finally, plaintiffs have
requested permission to make use of the Court's electronic case filing and case
management system. At this time, permission to do so is denied. Any further
consideration of the substantive issues raised by plaintiffs, including
plaintiffs' requests regarding conflicts of interest, must await the resolution
of anticipated motions to dismiss. (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on
3/21/08) (tro) (Entered: 03/21/2008) 3/21/2008 12 MOTION to Dismiss pursuant to
F. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(2) and (6). (Attached is the Declaration of Glenn T. Burhans,
Jr., in Support of The Florida Bar Defendants' Motion to Dismiss.) Document
filed by The Florida Bar, Lorraine Christine Hoffman (in her individual
capacity), Eric Turner (in his official capacity), John Anthony Boggs (in his
official capacity), Kenneth Marvin (in his official capacity). (rw) (Entered:
03/24/2008) 3/21/2008 13 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support of the Florida Bar
Defendants' Motion to dismiss the Complaint pursuant to F.R.C.P. 12(b)and (6).
Document filed by The Florida Bar, Lorraine Christine Hoffman (in her official
capacity), Eric Turner (in his official capacity), John Anthony Boggs (in his
official capacity), Kenneth Marvin (in his individual capacity). (jpo) (Entered:
03/24/2008) 3/24/2008 14 ORDER all defendants that seek to move to dismiss must
so move and submit memoranda of law no later than May 30, 2008. Plaintiffs'
response is due on June 30, 2008. Defendants' reply, if any, is due on July 14,
2008. The parties are reminded that the restrictions on page limits and exhibits
detailed in the Court's Individual Rules and Procedures are in effect, and
memoranda of law that do not comply with these Rules will be rejected. SO
ORDERED. (Responses due by 6/30/2008, Replies due by 7/14/2008.) (Signed by
Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 3/24/2008) (jmi) (Entered: 03/25/2008) 3/24/2008 15
MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint,
served. Proskauer Rose LLP served on 3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008. Service was
accepted by Greg Mashberg. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually);
Eliot I. Bernstein. (dle) (Entered: 03/25/2008) 3/24/2008 16 MARSHAL'S PROCESS
RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Kenneth
Rubenstein served on 3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008. Service was accepted by
Greg Mashberg. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I.
Bernstein. (dle) (Entered: 03/25/2008) 3/24/2008 17 MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT
AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Steven C. Krane
(in his official capacity) served on 3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008; Steven C.
Krane (in his individual capacity) served on 3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008.
Service was accepted by Gregg Mashberg. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein
(Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein. (dle) (Entered: 03/25/2008) 3/24/2008 18
MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint,
served. Estate of Stephen Kaye served on 3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008. Service
was accepted by Gregg Mashberg. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein
(Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein. (dle) (Entered: 03/25/2008) 3/24/2008 20
MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint,
served. Mary W. Martelino served on 3/14/2008, answer due 4/3/2008. Service was
accepted by Stephen Hall. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually);
Eliot I. Bernstein. (dle) (Entered: 03/25/2008) 3/24/2008 21 MARSHAL'S PROCESS
RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Virginia
State Bar served on 3/14/2008, answer due 4/3/2008. Service was accepted by
Stephen Hall. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I.
Bernstein. (dle) (Entered: 03/25/2008) 3/24/2008 22 MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT
AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Noel Sengel (in
her official capacity) served on 3/14/2008, answer due 4/3/2008; Noel Sengel (in
her individual capacity) served on 3/14/2008, answer due 4/3/2008. Service was
accepted by Stephen Hall. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually);
Eliot I. Bernstein. (dle) (Entered: 03/25/2008) 3/24/2008 23 MARSHAL'S PROCESS
RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Andrew H.
Goodman (in his official capacity) served on 3/14/2008, answer due 4/3/2008;
Andrew H. Goodman (in his individual capacity) served on 3/14/2008, answer due
4/3/2008. Service was accepted by Stephen Hall. Document filed by Eliot I.
Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein. (dle) (Entered: 03/25/2008)
3/25/2008 19 FILING ERROR - ELECTRONIC FILING IN NON-ECF CASE - NOTICE OF
APPEARANCE by John Walter Fried on behalf of Raymond A. Joao (Attachments: # 1
Affidavit of Service)(Fried, John) Modified on 3/26/2008 (db). (Entered:
03/25/2008) 3/25/2008 24 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Monica Anne Connell on behalf
of Catherine O'Hagen Wolfe (in their individual capacity), Paul Curran (in their
official capacity), Paul Curran (in individual capacity), Martin R. Gold (in his
individual capacity), Martin R. Gold (in their official capacity), Angela M.
Mazzarelli (in her official capacity), Angela M. Mazzarelli (in her individual
capacity), Richard T. Andrias (in his official capacity), Richard T. Andrias (in
his individual capacity), David B. Saxe, David B. Saxe, David Friedman (in his
official capacity), David Friedman (in his individual capacity), Luiz A.
Gonzales (in his official capacity), Luiz A. Gonzales (in his individual
capacity), Appellate Division Second Department Departmental Disciplinary
Committee, Lawrence DiGiovanna (in his official capacity), Lawrence DiGiovanna
(in his individual capacity), Diana Maxfield Kearse (in her official capacity),
Diana Maxfield Kearse (in her individual capacity), James E. Peltzer (in his
official capacity), James E. Peltzer (in his individual capacity), A. Gail
Prudenti (in her official capacity), A. Gail Prudenti (in her individual
capacity), Judith S. Kaye, Judith S. Kaye, State of New York Commission of
Investigation, Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary
Committee, Lawyers Fund for Client Protection of the State of New York, Thomas
J. Cahill (in his official capacity), Thomas J. Cahill (in his individual
capacity), Joseph Wigley (in his official capacity), Joseph Wigley (in his
individual capacity), Catherine O'Hagen Wolfe (in their official capacity) (dle)
(Entered: 03/26/2008) 3/26/2008 ***NOTE TO ATTORNEY TO RE-FILE DOCUMENT - NON-ECF
CASE ERROR. Note to Attorney John Walter Fried to MANUALLY RE-FILE Document
Notice of Appearance, Document No. 19. This case is not ECF. (db) (Entered:
03/26/2008) 3/26/2008 25 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by John Walter Fried on behalf of
Raymond A. Joao. (jco) (Entered: 03/27/2008) 3/27/2008 26 MARSHAL'S PROCESS
RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Michael C.
Grebe served on 3/16/2008, answer due 5/30/2008. Document filed by Eliot I.
Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein; P. Stephen Lamont. (pl) (Entered:
03/31/2008) 3/27/2008 27 MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE
EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Lorraine Christine Hoffman (in her
official capacity) served on 3/5/2008, answer due 3/25/2008. Document filed by
Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein; P. Stephen Lamont. (pl)
(Entered: 03/31/2008) 3/27/2008 28 MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF
SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Judith S. Kaye served on
3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein
(Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein; P. Stephen Lamont. (pl) (Entered:
03/31/2008) 3/27/2008 29 MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE
EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Lawyers Fund for Client Protection of
the State of New York served on 3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008. Document filed
by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein; P. Stephen Lamont.
(pl) (Entered: 03/31/2008) 3/27/2008 30 MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF
SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. State of New York Commission of
Investigation served on 3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008. Document filed by Eliot
I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein; P. Stephen Lamont. (pl)
(Entered: 03/31/2008) 3/27/2008 31 MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF
SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Paul Curran (in individual
capacity) served on 3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008. Document filed by Eliot I.
Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein; P. Stephen Lamont. (pl) (Entered:
03/31/2008) 3/27/2008 32 MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE
EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Angela M. Mazzarelli (in her official
capacity) served on 3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008. Document filed by Eliot I.
Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein; P. Stephen Lamont. (pl) (Entered:
03/31/2008) 3/27/2008 33 MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE
EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. James E. Peltzer (in his official
capacity) served on 3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008. Document filed by Eliot I.
Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein; P. Stephen Lamont. (pl) (Entered:
03/31/2008) 3/27/2008 34 MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE
EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Joseph Wigley (in his official capacity)
served on 3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein
(Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein; P. Stephen Lamont. (pl) (Entered:
03/31/2008) 3/27/2008 35 MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE
EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Catherine O'Hagen Wolfe (in their
official capacity) served on 3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008. Document filed by
Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein; P. Stephen Lamont. (pl)
(Entered: 03/31/2008) 3/27/2008 36 MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF
SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Richard T. Andrias (in his
official capacity) served on 3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008. Document filed by
Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein; P. Stephen Lamont. (pl)
(Entered: 03/31/2008) 3/27/2008 37 MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF
SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Thomas J. Cahill (in his
official capacity) served on 3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008. Document filed by
Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein; P. Stephen Lamont. (pl)
(Entered: 03/31/2008) 3/27/2008 38 MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF
SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Diana Maxfield Kearse (in her
official capacity) served on 3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008. Document filed by
Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein; P. Stephen Lamont. (pl)
(Entered: 03/31/2008) 3/27/2008 39 MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF
SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. A. Gail Prudenti (in her
official capacity) served on 3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008. Document filed by
Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein; P. Stephen Lamont. (pl)
(Entered: 03/31/2008) 3/27/2008 40 MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF
SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Lawrence DiGiovanna (in his
official capacity) served on 3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008. Document filed by
Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein; P. Stephen Lamont. (pl)
(Entered: 03/31/2008) 3/27/2008 41 MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF
SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served. Appellate Division Second
Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee served on 3/18/2008, answer due
4/7/2008. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I.
Bernstein; P. Stephen Lamont. (pl) (Entered: 03/31/2008) 3/27/2008 42 MARSHAL'S
PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served.
David Friedman (in his official capacity) served on 3/18/2008, answer due
4/7/2008. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I.
Bernstein; P. Stephen Lamont. (pl) (Entered: 03/31/2008) 3/27/2008 43 MARSHAL'S
PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served.
Luiz A. Gonzales (in his official capacity) served on 3/18/2008, answer due
4/7/2008. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I.
Bernstein; P. Stephen Lamont. (pl) (Entered: 03/31/2008) 3/27/2008 44 MARSHAL'S
PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served.
Kenneth Marvin (in his official capacity) served on 3/17/2008, answer due
4/7/2008. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I.
Bernstein; P. Stephen Lamont. (pl) (Entered: 03/31/2008) 3/27/2008 45 MARSHAL'S
PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons and Complaint, served.
Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee served
on 3/18/2008, answer due 4/7/2008. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein
(Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein; P. Stephen Lamont. (pl) (Entered:
03/31/2008) 3/31/2008 46 ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Judge Shira A. Scheindlin
from Kent K. Anker dated 3/28/2008 re: Requesting that defendants Foley &
Lardner LLP, Steven C. Becker, Douglas A. Boehm, William J. Dick, and Michael W.
Grebe be granted an extension of time to respond to plaintiffs' complaint.
ENDORSEMENT: Defendants request is granted. Plaintiffs response is due June 30,
2008, Defendants' reply is due July 14, 2008. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Shira
A. Scheindlin on 3/28/2008) (jpo) (Entered: 03/31/2008) 04/07/2008 47 MOTION to
Allow Filling of an Amend/Correct 1 Complaint. Document filed by Eliot I.
Bernstein (Individually), Eliot I. Bernstein. (jmi) (Entered: 04/08/2008)
04/07/2008 48 MOTION in Opposition to Defendants re: 12 MOTION to Dismiss Based
on Material and Substantial Evidence. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein
(Individually), Eliot I. Bernstein. (jmi) (Entered: 04/08/2008) 04/08/2008 49
ORDER: The Court has received a document styled "opposition to Defendants Motion
to dismiss." from plaintiffs. This document was apparently sent directly to
Chambers, not to the Courts Pro Se Office. Because plaintiffs have failed to
comply with the Court's standing order this document is rejected. If plaintiff
seeks to file a motion they must do so through the Court's Pro SE Office. The
time for defendants to move to dismiss is extended to May 30, 2008, plaintiffs
response is due by June 30, 2008 Defendants reply is due July 14, 2008. (Signed
by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 4/8/2008) (jpo) (Entered: 04/09/2008 )
04/11/2008 50 MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons
and Complaint, served. Raymond A. Joao served on 3/25/2008, answer due
5/30/2008. Service was accepted by John W. Fried. Document filed by Eliot I.
Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein. (dle) (Entered: 04/11/2008)
04/11/2008 51 MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons
and Complaint, served. William J. Dick served on 3/25/2008, answer due
5/30/2008. Service was accepted by William J. Dick. Document filed by Eliot I.
Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein. (dle) (Entered: 04/11/2008)
04/11/2008 52 MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons
and Complaint, served. Douglas A. Boehm served on 3/24/2008, answer due
5/30/2008. Service was accepted by Douglas Boehm. Document filed by Eliot I.
Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein. (dle) (Entered: 04/11/2008)
04/11/2008 53 MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons
and Complaint, served. Steven C. Becker served on 3/24/2008, answer due
5/30/2008. Service was accepted by Steven Becker. Document filed by Eliot I.
Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein. (dle) (Entered: 04/11/2008)
04/11/2008 54 MARSHAL'S PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED Summons
and Complaint, served. Foley Lardner LLP served on 3/20/2008, answer due
5/30/2008. Service was accepted by James R. Clark. Document filed by Eliot I.
Bernstein (Individually); Eliot I. Bernstein. (dle) (Entered: 04/11/2008)
04/15/2008 55 ORDER that the Court has received plaintiffs' request to file an
Amended Complaint. Plaintiffs' request is granted. The Amended Complaint must be
filed no later than 5/10/08. Notwithstanding the filing of the Amended
Complaint, defendants' deadline to move to dismiss or file an Answer remains
5/30/08. Plaintiffs' response remains due on 6/30/08. Defendants' reply, if any,
remains due on 7/14/08. The parties are again reminded that the restrictions on
page limits and exhibits detailed in the Court's Individual Rules and Procedures
are in effect, and memoranda of law that do not comply with these Rules will be
rejected. (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 4/14/08) (dle) (Entered:
04/15/2008) 04/24/2008 56 MOTION for Stephen Hall to Appear Pro Hac Vice.
Document filed by Virginia State Bar, Andrew H. Goodman (in his official
capacity), Andrew H. Goodman (in his individual capacity), Noel Sengel (in her
official capacity), Noel Sengel (in her individual capacity), Mary W. Martelino.
(dle) (Entered: 04/25/2008) 04/29/2008 n/a CASHIERS OFFICE REMARK on 56 Motion
to Appear Pro Hac Vice, in the amount of $25.00, paid on 04/24/2008, Receipt
Number 649058. (jd) (Entered: 04/29/2008) 05/02/2008 57 DECLARATION of Kent K.
Anker RESPONSE to Plaintiffs' Motion for Pro Bono Counsel. Document filed by
Foley Lardner LLP, Michael C. Grebe, William J. Dick, Douglas A. Boehm, Steven
C. Becker. (jmi) (Entered: 05/05/2008) 05/02/2008 58 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by Foley Lardner LLP,
Michael C. Grebe, William J. Dick, Douglas A. Boehm, Steven C. Becker. (jmi)
(Entered: 05/05/2008) 05/02/2008 59 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Lili Zandpour, Kent
Kari Anker on behalf of Foley Lardner LLP, Michael C. Grebe, William J. Dick,
Douglas A. Boehm, Steven C. Becker (jmi) (Entered: 05/05/2008) 05/09/2008 60
ORDER: Service of any amended complaint will be stayed until such time as the
scheduled motions to dismiss have been decided. Accordingly, the time for newly
named defendants to respond to the Complaint is hereby stayed until after the
Court has ruled on those motions. This Order is subject to reconsideration upon
receipt of opposition, if any, from plaintiffs. (Signed by Judge Shira A.
Scheindlin on 5/9/08) (tro) (Entered: 05/12/2008) 05/12/2008 61 NOTICE OF
APPEARANCE by Joanna Frances Smith on behalf of Steven C. Krane (in his
individual capacity), Kenneth Rubenstein, Proskauer Rose LLP (pl) (Entered:
05/13/2008) 05/12/2008 62 MOTION for a pro se office to copy and transmit
amended complaint to U.S. Marshal's Office. Document filed by Eliot I. Bernstein
(Individually), P. Stephen Lamont. (pl) (Entered: 05/13/2008) 05/13/2008 63
ORDER granting 56 Motion for Stephen M. Hall to Appear Pro Hac Vice. (Signed by
Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 5/13/08) (mme) (Entered: 05/13/2008) 05/14/2008 64
MEMO ENDORSEMENT on re: 62 MOTION for a pro se office to copy and transmit
amended complaint to U.S. Marshal's Office. filed by P. Stephen Lamont, Eliot I.
Bernstein ENDORSEMENT; In accordance with this court's order dated May 9, 2008,
service of any amended complaint is stayed until such the as the scheduled
motions to dismiss are decided. Plaintiff's motion is therefore denied with
leave to renew after that time. (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 5/13/08)
(mme) (Entered: 05/14/2008) 05/22/2008 65 MOTION IN OPPOSITION TO 60 STAY ORDER
dated 5/9/08 - REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION ORDER. Document filed by Eliot I.
Bernstein (Individually), Eliot I. Bernstein, P. Stephen Lamont. (db) (Entered:
05/22/2008) 05/28/2008 66 MOTION for an order of dismissal, under FRCP Rule 12
dismissing the Complaint in this action as to the Virginia Defendants in its
entirety. Document filed by Virginia State Bar, Andrew H. Goodman (in his
official capacity), Andrew H. Goodman (in his individual capacity), Noel Sengel
(in her official capacity), Noel Sengel(in her individual capacity), Mary W.
Martelino.(dle) (Entered: 05/29/2008) 05/28/2008 67 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support
re: 66 MOTION to Dismiss. Document filed by Virginia State Bar, Andrew H.
Goodman (in his official capacity), Andrew H. Goodman (in his individual
capacity), Noel Sengel (in her official capacity), Noel Sengel (in her
individual capacity), Mary W. Martelino. (dle) (Entered: 05/29/2008) 05/30/2008
68 MOTION for an order pursuant to F.R.C.P. 12(b)(2) and (6) to Dismiss the
Amended Complaint; w/ attch. Declaration in support. Document filed by Lorraine
Christine Hoffman (in her official capacity), Eric Turner (in his official
capacity), John Anthony Boggs (in his official capacity), Kenneth Marvin (in his
official capacity). (pl) (Entered: 05/30/2008) 05/30/2008 69 MEMORANDUM OF LAW
in Support re: 68 MOTION to Dismiss.. Document filed by Lorraine Christine
Hoffman (in her official capacity), John Anthony Boggs (in his official
capacity), Kenneth Marvin (in his official capacity, et al. (pl) (Entered:
05/30/2008) 05/30/2008 70 CROSS MOTION to Dismiss Complaint. Document filed by
Meltzer Lippe Goldstein & Breistone LLP, Lewis S. Meltzer. (Howard, Richard)
(Entered: 05/30/2008) 05/30/2008 71 AFFIDAVIT of Richard M. Howard, Esq. in
Support re: 70 CROSS MOTION to Dismiss Complaint.. Document filed by Meltzer
Lippe Goldstein & Breistone LLP, Lewis S. Meltzer. (Howard, Richard) (Entered:
05/30/2008) 05/30/2008 72 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of Notice of Cross Motion with
Affidavit in Support served on Eliot I. Bernstein, P. Stephen Lamont, Monica
Connell, Esq., Gregg M. Mashberg, Esq., Glenn T. Burhans, Jr., Esq., John W.
Fried, Esq. on May 30, 2008. Service was made by Mail. Document filed by Meltzer
Lippe Goldstein & Breistone LLP, Lewis S. Meltzer. (Howard, Richard) (Entered:
05/30/2008) DOCUMENTS FILED BUT NOT YET ON COURT DOCKET 1/25/2008 Court
Memorandum to Serve 2 Copies of Complaint as Courtesy to the Attorney General
[Andrew Cuomo] 2/19/2008 RE: MISSING COMPLAINTS TO US MARSHALL FOR SERVICE IN
CASE 07 CIV. 11196 (SAS) ELIOT I. BERNSTEIN, ET AL. V. APPELLATE DIVISION FIRST
DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENTAL DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE, ET AL. 3/5/2008 Not Docketed Re:
Plaintiffs Opposition to State Defendants Letter of February 29, 2008 in Eliot
I. Bernstein, et al. v. Appellate Division, First Department Departmental
Disciplinary Committee, et al., Docket No. 07 CV 11196 (SAS) 3/5/2008 Not
Docketed and Perhaps Skipped Re: Plaintiffs Opposition to Proskauer Rose March
4, 2008 to this Court in Eliot I. Bernstein, et al. v. Appellate Division, First
Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee, et al., Docket No. 07 CV 11196
(SAS) 3/10/2008 New First Department Attorney Ethics Complaints filed against
Proskauer Rose, LLP, Foley and Lardner, Gregg M. Mashberg of Proskauer, Joanna
F. Smith of Proskauer, Todd C. Norbitz of Foley and Lardner and Anne B. Sekel of
Foley and Lardner. 3/13/2008 Not Docketed Re: Plaintiffs Opposition to Court
Order dated March 7, 2008 in Eliot I. Bernstein, et al. v. Appellate Division,
First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee, et al., Docket No. 07 CV
11196 (SAS) 3/14/2008 Letter to New York Attorney General to reinvestigate prior
Iviewit complaints against public office corruption based on the new information
in Anderson 4/1/2008 Motion in Opposition to Florida Bar Motion to Dismiss Part
1 - Conflicts 4/7/2008 Motion in Opposition to Florida Bar Motion to Dismiss
Part 2 4/7/2008 Motion to allow for filing Amended Complaint 9/24/2007 Letter
from New York Attorney General denying investigation of public officials at
First Department
***Note to hackers, this
site is an exhibit to the United States Supreme Court, the US Second Circuit
Court, the US District Court Southern District of New York, the New York
Attorney General, the United States Patent & Trademark Office, the United
States Patent & Trademark Office - Office of Enrollment & Discipline, the
Inspector General of the US Department of Justice, the Federal Bureau of
Investigation, the Institute of Professional Representatives before the
European Patent Office (epi) and more and where tampering with this site or
any documents contained herein may have federal
felony ramifications, including RICO charges with a predicate act of
attempted murder - hack at your own risk - or get a hacky sack and get a real
life.***
This Site is Protected under the Electronic Communications
Privacy Act
18 U.S.C. SS 2510-2521 and all other
state, federal and international electronic communications laws!
VIEW
her Proskauer husband Stephen Rakowe Kaye and her former whipping boy clerk
stool, Proskauer partner Steven C. Krane. Will Batman survive or die, will
Robin split to Cleveland and will Gotham be left with Joker's running, or should
we say ruining Gotham, stay tuned for our next action packed episode or you'll
never know if Gotham goes to hell. 
VIEW
7 comments:
"Life being what it is, one dreams of revenge."
- Paul Gauguin
Thugs that flip from law enforcers to criminals cannot psychologically perfect the two!
I've known about the corruption in the NYS courts for many years as my husband worked as a judge's law secretary until he retired last year.
Maybe- just maybe -there is hope with this Federal Justice Scheindlin.